New Game Thread: Possitive ONLY!!!!
by saint
on Oct 12, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
OOOOOOAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAANNNDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!
RRRRRRRAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDEERRRRRRRRRRRS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 recs |
40
comments
Email
PrintComments
Didn't the Raiders have a player name Michael Bush?
by theblackpearl on Oct 12, 2008 11:59 AM PDT 0 recs
I forgot
about him. Where has he been?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on
Oct 12, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
True that:
RRAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIDDDDEEEERRRRRRRS!!!!!!!!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
They Do!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mc "Badass" Too!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
New thread?! How about a new phuckin coach?! Fire Cable!!! He's not the guy Al
hired!!! He’s a liar!!! bring back Art and T Walsh!!!
by Bacon on Oct 12, 2008 12:01 PM PDT 0 recs
There's Our Offense:
McBaddass
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:02 PM PDT 0 recs
May Trade Bush?
Report: Raiders may deal either Fargas or Bush
Article Launched: 10/12/2008 10:45:53 AM PDT
The Oakland Raiders are ready to trade either Justin Fargas or Michael Bush, according to a report on CBS Sports this morning.
CBS analyst Charley Casserly reported that the Raiders, who have three solid running backs in Fargas, Bush and rookie Darren McFadden, would be willing to deal either Fargas or Bush. Casserly said that Bush, in his second year from Louisville, would be the most likely to be dealt.
The NFL’s trading deadline is on Tuesday.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Oct 12, 2008 12:02 PM PDT 0 recs
OOOAAAKKLLAAANNDD!!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:03 PM PDT 0 recs
First Down!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:03 PM PDT 0 recs
Nice to see the clock stop
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:04 PM PDT 0 recs
even though it was an incomplete pass. :)
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:04 PM PDT 0 recs
Bush is finally in:
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:05 PM PDT 0 recs
Our Bush, That is
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:05 PM PDT 0 recs
I
understood :)
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on
Oct 12, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
up
0 recs
wow
look @ indy go vs balt
COME ON BUSH!
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Oct 12, 2008 12:06 PM PDT 0 recs
Bush dropped the ball
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:06 PM PDT 0 recs
I thought that was
DMC’s problem?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on
Oct 12, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Nah, it's Curry's
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
oh it was
a reception. I interpreted it as a fumble
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on
Oct 12, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
faket
the punt!!!!!!!!
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Oct 12, 2008 12:07 PM PDT 0 recs
That may have worked:
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Time to go back to the other thread
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Oct 12, 2008 12:10 PM PDT 0 recs
Michael Huff
is a bust?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Oct 12, 2008 12:10 PM PDT 0 recs
Looks that way
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on
Oct 12, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Dont plan on winning till AL Davis is dead.
Soooo… we prob have a long time till we even sniff .500
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on
Oct 12, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
This, my friends...
Is what happens when you use coaches like tampons.
by Amoc on Oct 12, 2008 1:23 PM PDT 0 recs
Since this is a postive thread
The Raiders did win me some $$
1st Q under
1st half under
2nd half over parlayed w NO -3
NO -7 parlayed w under
Miller more than 36.5 yards
Only bummer was the 20 bucks for Huggy bear only getting 2 yards on his first carry
Game sucked but at least my club seats are paid for next week, so I can puke in person watching !!!
by Bud Light on Oct 12, 2008 2:34 PM PDT 0 recs
There was not a bright spot through the entire game.
Russell threw TD passes high, guys dropped several passes, play calling was terrible, and that is before I talk about the defense. It is one thing to say a defense is tired because the offense did nothing, but the defense has to get off the field also, and in the 2nd quarter they did not. So much for the nice talk about the transition, this team flat laid down today. It is a mystery to me that Brees completed 30 some odd passes and only one pass was downfield over 10 yds. but the Raiders apparently don’t have a pass play called to a back coming out of the backfield, a short quick pass and let McFadden run. I guess you can forget this season also, so much hope to begin and then this fiasco. I guess the Raiders didn’t want to lose any 4th quarter lead, at least these losses are easy to take, over early, pack and go home.
by Laoren on Oct 12, 2008 3:18 PM PDT 0 recs
fish stinks from the head
Way to go Al,we’ve gone from commitment to excellence, to commitment to excrement!
by alzado77 on Oct 12, 2008 8:05 PM PDT 0 recs
I'll start watching again.
If we win another game this year. The Raiders didn’t even show up against the Saints and I am not going to go to the bar and spend my money to watch them get trampled any more. Obviously, Lane Kiffin was not the problem at all. If anything he was making the team better with new ideas and a new concept except for Ryan telling the defense to lay down when we got a lead. Now with the Cable in there I don’t see us beating anyone if we continue to play like we did against the Saints. And I agree on the “whole team is a bust” statement at this point until proven otherwise. I heard the NFL Network just now say the Tom Cable era looks like an Art Shell 2 era which I have to agree with.
On the Fargas/Bush trade issue…..we should keep them both for depth. But if I had to choose one it would be Fargas because he is a proven player, and we would get more for him than what we would from Bush. We basically traded Randy Moss to get Michael Bush so if Bush is released it just further shows Davis’ lack of committment to winning. McFadden is better than Fargas as for being a finesse home run hitter. Bush is our power guy and reminds me of a faster Zack Crockett so I hope he stays for the 1-2 punch of McFadden and Bush. Bring up Louis Rankin if one is traded because he appears to be a good prospect with his performance in preseason.
Plus, Fargas is injury prone. I love watching him play but his reckless running style leads to constant injuries. So, I hope that if anyone gets traded, it’s Fargas for a good/accomplished safety to start over Huff. Or, for a linebacker because Ricky Brown sucks. Just not any draft picks because the Raiders ! at drafting.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til' I die.
by thepunisher00187 on Oct 13, 2008 1:54 PM PDT 0 recs
It is hard to believe they would trade Fargas
He is the one who carries the ball most, and frankly Bush has been a disappointment.\
He doesn’t seem to run with any authority but I still wouldn’t give up on him. Hopefully neither will be traded, you never have enough backs, they get injured so often. I have been saying for two years we don’t have a decent strong side backer, nothing has changed. Maybe we draft the USC linebacker this year, we need help fast.
by Laoren on Oct 13, 2008 4:20 PM PDT 0 recs
Napolean Harris
just became available again. He might be out to prove himself now and show that he is worth the first round pick we used to get him. Or, we could get Hartwell and actually GIVE HIM A CHANCE and see how he does on the field during an actual game because we need an SLB like now.
I’d prefer to go with Laoren on this and just lose the rest of our games to either get James Laurinaitis or Rey Maualuga.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til' I die.
by thepunisher00187 on Oct 14, 2008 7:22 PM PDT 0 recs
New FanPost
