Oakland Raiders News: Dominic Rhodes Cut
Two days after drafting running back Darren McFadden, the Oakland Raiders have informed running back Dominic Rhodes that he's being released.
The move, first reported by ESPN's John Clayton, was a necessity for the Raiders, as the team was in danger of going over the NFL's salary cap. Rhodes had a $1.75 million salary for 2008, which is now off the Raiders' books.
Thus ends an ugly year for Rhodes as a Raider. He served a four-game suspension for violating the NFL's substance-abuse policy, and finished his time in Oakland with 302 yards on 75 carries. He'll likely catch on with some other team for a salary around the league minimum, but the days of anyone offering him a $1.75 million salary are long gone.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
I was expecting this cut
But why didn’t the Raiders package Rhodes with Washington for a draft pick?
When I thought about how much JaMarcus needed a receiver to grow with and how DeSean Jackson fell deep into the second round, I feel like we really missed an opportunity to steal a first round talent like DeSean.
Green Hulk Fists
by oaklandSMASH on Apr 28, 2008 3:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading has not been a strength of the new regime:
Pride And Poise!!!
by saint on Apr 28, 2008 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
Past my elation for DMC, I had a sinking feeling watching all the picks teams like the Chiefs had.
Fabian was going to be traded and Rhodes let go. Is someone in the Raider brass not seeing the opportunity we could have had with this?
Green Hulk Fists
by oaklandSMASH on Apr 28, 2008 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would other teams
want our trash?
by Nate Dogg on Apr 28, 2008 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Two years ago, Rhodes was an instrumental part of a Super Bowl winning team and Washington could be seen as a work-in-progress, just as we saw a w-i-p in Javon Walker.
The Raiders could’ve fooled some team who was mystified by our teams early-season rushing average.
Hell, if the Bungles were stupid enough to not accept two high draft picks for Chad Johnson, anything can happen.
Green Hulk Fists
by oaklandSMASH on Apr 29, 2008 1:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is only one front office in the NFL
that can be mystified into trading for a player…..
by Nate Dogg on Apr 29, 2008 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
look for Jordan
to be the next to go. I wish he would have been the one to go. In my opinion, Rhodes was better, and costs less than Jordan. Oh well, with him gone there’s more money to throw all around! Mainly for the Darren contract.
The Autumn Wind Is A Raider, and his name is KA1Z3R. >:)>
by KA1Z3R on Apr 28, 2008 3:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We should have shown Lamont the door a long time ago
Trap door is more like it.
Green Hulk Fists
by oaklandSMASH on Apr 28, 2008 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
One of them had to go. But Rhodes is better than Jordan in my opinion.
Born And Raised One, Always Gonna Be One, A True Raider Fan.
by Rayder K on Apr 28, 2008 7:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I expect
to see Jordan gone to. Fargas/McFadden will by primary rushers I think.
Yes, Saint, now I’m excited about McFadden. Because now it all makes sense.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Apr 28, 2008 9:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hell
Should of let Jordan gone kept on to Rhodes. He finished the season fantastically and had a monster preseason missing those 4 games and Fargas coming out really put him down in depth. He was cheaper the lamont, less injury prone, did I mention cheaper, o and he was more talented. We will wait to see what happens with Lamont I expected him to be released fairly quickly with us still close on cap.
by lockdown on Apr 29, 2008 12:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
In Order To Save Cap Space:
There is some reason why we have to wait until June 1st on LaMont.
Pride And Poise!!!
by saint on Apr 29, 2008 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Physical and Cap
Players also have to be able to pass a physical before being cut, a la Shaun Alexander. Teams are usually given a certain number of cuts prior to June 1 that are designated as June 1 cuts for cap purposes, but Lamont would have to pass a physical first. Mini camps start in a week or so; I would say that Kiffin, Knapp, and Rathman want to see what they’re really working with before making another move.
by LiveAdam on Apr 29, 2008 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if LaMont is Out There:
Lifting buckets of sand over his head in order to keep his back tweaked.
I know a guy who was cut from the Niners with an “injury” and he still gets paid to this day. He never even took a game day snap.
Pride And Poise!!!
by saint on Apr 29, 2008 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't hang on to either...
....and keep Bush.
I expect Bush to get his tryout this year. And if he electrifies, look for a Fargas trade come next draft day.
by Raybin on Apr 29, 2008 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fargas
will stay. He is a great worker and very good character. And look at his contract. he is somewhat cheap
Born And Raised One, Always Gonna Be One, A True Raider Fan.
by Rayder K on Apr 29, 2008 4:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Rayder K
Fargas has got great quality at a cheap price. He’s practically a McFadden clone except we know that Fargas can excel while McFadden hasn’t taken an official handoff yet.
The Autumn Wind Is A Raider, and his name is KA1Z3R. >:)>
by KA1Z3R on Apr 29, 2008 4:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Just Wondering
What will we get by trading Jordon?
I don’t want him, but its not like we are getting anything good
Wear the Silver, Wear the Black, Never Retreat, Always Attack!!
by Jagjivan on May 1, 2008 5:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably like
a 7th round pick and the 2020 draft or sumthing hecka stupied.
Wack To Mack With The General and The Back. (J-Mac and D-Mac)
by Rayder K on May 1, 2008 7:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We might get something better
if we package Jordan and Stu/Bing together in a trade for maybe a fifth or sixth.
>:) Welcome to the Black Gate! Oakland D forever! (:<
by KA1Z3R on May 2, 2008 9:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















