Raider's Breakdown: RB Updated!!
Everyone knows Oakland had a top-notch running game due to the zone-blocking system where my grandma could have a 1000 yard season. There was a solid stable of RB on roster. The Raiders managed to finish the 6th best rushing attack in the league and you can expect to see them finish in the top-5. The running backs have been upgraded, and more than you think. Let's breakdown the current roster:
1. Justin Fargas- Trust me, Fargas will be the starter, and if not him, it'll be Michael Bush. McFadden isn't starter quality (more on this later). Fargas busts through the hole with rockets on his feet. He's one of the fastest RB in the league. His problems are injury and receiving ability (which I don't think have been fairly tested). I expect Fargas to be injured once again, but not before getting at or around 1000 yards. Grade: B+
2. Michael Bush- Bush has been reported as a big physical back who's faster than you may think. Kiffin says he can also catch the ball well out of the backfield. I look for him to be bowling over LB on short-yardage situations. I also think you can see Bush split a little less than half the carries with Fargas. He's a strong counterpart to Fargas and looks like he could have a miniature Taylor/Jones-Drew tandem. I like Bush and think in the future, he'll be the Raider's official back. Grade: B
3. Darren McFadden- Now then, I'll explain why McFadden's not starting quality. McFadden is not a very strong back. He'll be repeatedly taken down on the first hit while Fargas has a few moves to avoid tackles and more strength. Now then for McFadden's plans for this year. I expect Bush and Fargas to bust up the defense while McFadden gets off some huge run on a sluggish defense. He can also be used in goal-line situations for big outside runs. He can also play WR for mismatches when the D least expects it. Expect McFadden and Bush to have the majority of Oakland's rushing touchdowns. Grade: B
I expect Jordan to be gone because of his attitude and ability. He's just not what he was in his 1000 yard 05 season. Louis Rankin might become another addition to the roster.
Now for the fullbacks. Technically, these are running backs, and a separate section on them is kinda lame and pointless. Oakland has two talented fullbacks, both very underrated in my eyes.
1. Justin Griffith- One of, if not the, best receiving fullbacks in the league. While he didn't contribute much to the running game in 07, he did make a few key receptions and blocks. With Russell manning the QB spot, you can expect Griffith to catch even more passes for even more yards. I wouldn't expect him to be used for much rushing (maybe short-yardage, I don't know) Justin is great-natured player with a lot of talent. Grade: A-
2. Oren O' Neal- I don't care who you are, O' Neal isn't commonly mentioned in the list of great fullbacks in this league, but I think he was one of last year's shining rookies. O' Neal is an outstanding blocker who always gives his all on every play. While his stats show zero rushing attempts, he was one of our biggest contributors to the running game. What I like is that he doesn't mind being an under the radar kind of guy. Don't look for Hall of Fame stats from him, but expect Hall of Fame blocks. More on O' Neal:
http://mvn.com/nfl-raiders/2008/05/07/fullback-oren-oneal-the-oakland-raiders-secret-weapon/#more-659
Grade: B
Now, what do I expect to happen in the ways of FB deals, Matt Hahn will probably be around longer than most of you think. He's reported as being a good running fullback with average receiving ability. I doubt he'll make final cut, but instead add competition for Griffith as he had little last year.
Overall Grade (RB and FB): A+
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
McFadden will be #1
Ka1Z3R, good analysis, but you are continually negative on the capabilities of Darren McFadden. Al is not going to pay him what he’s going to pay him to be “2nd string”. DMAC will play and play a lot. And whether he “starts” the game or not, he will end up with more carries and yards than Fargas.
I would like to know where you get your facts that McFadden is not “a very strong back” and “repeatedly taken down on the first hit”. The dude rush the ball 325 times in 2007. 325 times!!! Out of that many carries, the odds are pretty good that there will be a few “first hit tackles”. But since he rushed for over 1800 yards and a 5.63 average, I’ll bet there were a lot more broken tackles than the one hit variety. Many of these “one hit tackles were a result of McFadden running the ball from the QB position without the pro style set up of blocking. With DMAC in the ZBS with a fullback and a tight end, you will see how well his strength and speed will flourish.
by TheRaiderWay on
May 20, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If you're wondering
I saw his “lack of strength” on various sports analysts’ videos and ones on Youtube. Most of the runs were on RB. I’d also like to add that 325 carries isn’t realistic for a rookie in the NFL. Besides that, there’s already two other RB ,who in my mind, are better fit for starting. I don’t doubt that McFadden will get the majority of the yardage and touchdowns, in fact, I highly believe in it. But he will get these on long-yardage plays instead of 325 carries. Besides, you can’t base his abilities in the NFL based on college stats. The NFL is a harder, faster, stronger league full of extremely talented players who know and play the game extraordinarily well.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on
May 20, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well...
What are you basing Bush’s abilities on? Furthermore, Bush hasn’t played football in two years, let alone a single down in the “harder, faster, stronger” NFL. Now I fully believe that Bush will be a beast for the Raiders, I’m just questioning your consistent negativity on McFadden’s abilities based on some so-called analysts and a Youtube video. I never said that he would get 325 carries with the Raiders. The 325 carries just illustrates that he is anything but “not very strong back”.
by TheRaiderWay on
May 20, 2008 1:17 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
When I said not a very strong back
I meant in the sense of breaking tackles not injury, I’m very confident that McFadden will play in every game, but I think he’s just a bit overhyped. He’s a playmaker who makes big plays when needed, not an every down back.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on
May 20, 2008 1:19 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
uh, duh
Or why would the Raiders draft him for. They already had fargas that couldn’t finish his runs with a TD.
by raiderlalo81 on
May 20, 2008 8:40 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It doesn't matter how you got the TDs
what matters is that u got them
Wear the Silver,Wear the Black, Never Retreat, Always Attack!!!
by Jagjivan on
May 21, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know that
my point is that they drafted him to finish the job, get the job done, score the touch downs, make the plays, cause thats why they were 4-12 cause they couldnt score touchdowns. COMPRENDE!
by raiderlalo81 on
May 21, 2008 8:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sí comprendo
pero usted no tuvo que conseguir todo grave
lol
Wear the Silver,Wear the Black, Never Retreat, Always Attack!!!
by Jagjivan on
May 22, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
P.S.
Receivers will be up tomorrow, that includes WR and TE.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on
May 20, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That first line about Fargas cracked me up: Trust me, Fargas will be the starter, and if not him, it’ll be Michael Bush. – So we’re trusting that Fargas may or may not be the starter? Ok, I’ll trust you! : ) It just read funny to me….anyways…...
I was under the impression that DMC was a bigger stronger Reggie Bush, and you seem to think he’s not strong enough. Interesting, if I remember correctly, DMC in an interview with Raiders.com commented on his stregnth being an asset. Maybe I’m wrong/confused with something else, but I didn’t think that was the case.
I agree that Jordan will be gone. He better be gone.
I hope that I’m right and everyone is underestimating Bush. What a difference a year makes, he was THE MAN coming out of the draft until he got hurt. I expect good things from him and hopefully he shows the Raiders that they don’t know what they have under their noses.
by passionately objective on
May 20, 2008 3:55 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I Agree
with KA1ZER about Mcfadden not being the starter. But he will get enough carries to use all of his qualities. Bush, I hope, will become our primary back. But I haven’t seen one NFL game with him so I don’t know how to come at this.
Wack To Mack With The General and The Back. (J-Mac and D-Mac)
by Rayder K on
May 20, 2008 4:19 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you Rayder K!
Finally someone sees what I mean when I’m talking about DMC. I’m not saying he won’t get carries, in fact, I hope he gets plenty. But it’ll be in certain situations where the defense is worn out. Then POW! a huge 50-yard TD run. Look, DMC is probably faster than MOST defensive players and I expect many great things from him. It doesn’t matter who’s starting anyway. In Oakland, everyone gets PLENTY of carries and a fair share of the fame.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on
May 20, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
McFadden is mostly like a RB who will get like 15 yds/carry average the whole year. But Bush is the person who i wants as the primary RB. Fargas should be 2nd. The only thing i am worried about is Bush coming off a injury. Im worried but not as much as i was laster year.
Wear the Silver,Wear the Black, Never Retreat, Always Attack!!!
by Jagjivan on
May 20, 2008 6:48 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
YEHP!!!!
Wishes do come true RAIDERS NATION. We finally have all the RBacks needed, and only time will tell. I always Loved the ideah, wanted and hoped for The RAIDERS to have a RB who is Hispanic/Latino represent for the people and most importantly RAIDER NATION. Fargas is that man, but everyone Dun Know to be the ruffest and the tuffest in this game. It is a must that you roll deep with your African brothers too, and as for Bush and DMC those men too look to be the best in the game. Most important factor for a RB, the OLine, and if they put in work something like last season. IT’s A WRAP!!!!
CANT STOP WONT STOP! WIN lose OR LIE RAIDER TILL I DIE!!!!
by 8fog3town1 on
May 25, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
solid group
With Fargas, Bush, and now McFadden, it seems we have the best running back core in the entire league. I still say we should have released Jordan and traded Rhodes for a worthy offensive linemen. But it doesn’t matter now because Fargas is the finesse, Bush is the power, and McFadden does it all.
by thepunisher00187 on
May 26, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Jacksonville might have something to say about that
and Minnesota too, but the Raider backfield has to be talked about when you’re talking about the best in the league right now.
by RaiderPete on
May 26, 2008 8:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
young guns
Fred Taylor won’t be playing much longer and Jones-Drew simply cannot carry the load by himself. Adrian Peterson is injury prone because of his aggressive style and Chester Taylor is just average. Our backs are young and ready to show everyone what pounding the rock is all about. Teams will be so worried with Jamarcus’ cannon arm that d-backs will be playing deep which will open it up for our running backs to run for a first down almost every touch. Justin Griffith is an over-looked fullback but is excellent at blocking and will be a big difference maker for our run game. I also think McFadden will excel as an option wide out just like Reggie Bush did, but unlike Bush he has enough power to run through people instead of around them. Keep McFadden in the play calling scheme and wins will start coming our way.
by thepunisher00187 on
May 28, 2008 10:58 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
very good analysis
I totally agree punisher.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on
May 29, 2008 4:08 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs










