Oakland Raiders News: Darren McFadden Officially Signs ON!!!
The Oakland Raiders have announced the official signing of Darren McFadden.
The Press Conference will be held at 11AM today:
You can tune in Here to hear it.
This is a HUGE change from last season when our top pick didn't make it into camp until the season was already underway.
Gone is the speculation from the haters that D-Mac will be holding out as long as Russell.
This is YET another sign that the Raiders are a well functioning organization and it is flying in the faces of all the doubters and media vultures who have been circling this franchise for the past 5 seasons.
The D-Mac in Silver and Black Show is underway in Oakland, and you'd better get your seats now before they are all GONE!!!
Wow!!! Beastusmaximus broke the story first ...You win for best up all night report...Ahhh To be young again!!!
0 recs |
44 comments
Comments
This Is Wonderful
Our boy D-Mac is ready to shine with his new pay check. Great news raiders nation. People are changing their views about us. We just keep getting better. Raiders for life!
Wack To Mack With The General and The Back. (J-Mac and D-Mac)
by Rayder K on Jun 6, 2008 1:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't wait
To smash those Donkey’s in Oakland!!!
Nuff said
by Raider76 on Jun 6, 2008 4:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
John Clayton of ESPN
has even come out of his slumber. He pointed out what we have been saying all along that the Raiders schedule is such that the only winning team they face from last year in the 1st 12 games are the Chargers. He has them going 7-5 before the NE game. I actually have them going 8-4 at that time. Anything less than 10 wins this season is going to be very disappointing. In this league, dramatic turnarounds are not unusual. Even the worst teams lose very close games so there is a very fine line between winning and losing.
A long run here, an interception there makes all the difference in this league. Hopefully with the parts the Raiders now have the wins will start flowing this way for a change.
It appears from listening to Kiffin that Henderson has a long way to go before he steps into the starting lineup.
by Laoren on Jun 6, 2008 4:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Get ready to be disappointed
if you’re expecting 10 wins. This team is going to have a big turn around, but not that big.
by RaiderPete on Jun 8, 2008 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yaya
now all we got to do is go sign up asu so he can start goinn to camp.
by GSwarrior on Jun 6, 2008 11:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
eagles fan here
I’m not a raider hater by any means but arent you any concerned that if the raiders have another disappointing season (which isn’t out of the question by any means) that most of your cap is taken up by 6 players? If Russell ends up being a bust, i just don’t see the s ilver and black being able to turn it around anytime soon.
by Joe_D on Jun 7, 2008 8:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So true
The QB is the most important position in the NFL. I don’t think there are any Raider fans who don’t believe that where Russell goes so goes the Raiders. But it is no different than any other team. Two years ago the Eagles rode on Garcia to get into the playoffs. Look at all the bottom feeders in the NFL, the main problem with all those teams was the QB. One exception might be the Bengals who had the absolutely worst defense I have ever watched. Look at what happened to Cleveland when they changed QB’s, went from 4 wins to 10 in one season. The one thing the Raiders have in their favor this year is a favorable schedule and never underestimate the importance of that. For the last few years they have had terrible matchups and terrible QB play. Russell is a rookie QB and that doesn’t bode well, but on the other hand Rothlisberger was a rookie when Pitt won 13 or so games, time will tell.
by Laoren on Jun 7, 2008 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will still do alright since we're a running a team
I doubt Russell will be a bust since he is the highest rated QB out of college by Sports Illustrated in recent memory and THE highest rated QB out of college from a reliable source Beastusmaximus Illustrated
He red shirted last year, it didn’t matter he was an underclassmen anyways, this is our year, Russell will not be spectacular but he will be a solid starter. no more “who’s next” in our QB situation
After my umbilical cord was cut, silver and black spewed out!!
by Beastusmaximus on Jun 7, 2008 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lots of teams are structured that way
like the colts for one. It’s not a great situation, but it’s not something to be overly concerned about. Especially considering the age of who that money is going to.
by RaiderPete on Jun 8, 2008 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is the cap
walker, mcfadden , russell, hall, kelly, wilson and hopefully nhamdi
that is a lot of mouths to feed…..can we?
After my umbilical cord was cut, silver and black spewed out!!
by Beastusmaximus on Jun 8, 2008 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It will be a non-issue.
First, according to ESPN’s Chris Mortenson, the Raiders are hiring former Packer executive, Andrew Brandt, who was their Salary Cap Manager, to the same role with the Raiders. Brandt resigned from the Green Bay Packers as vice president of player finance in late January when the franchise hired Mark Murphy as its team president. Brandt is being brought in to first and foremost to get the Raiders’ cap in order so that they can sign Nnamdi to a long-term deal. Secondly, Brandt’s job will be to structure the Raiders’ cap for going forward for what now appears to be the short-term. This is because the owners have opted out of the CBA and as of now we are heading into an uncapped year beginning in 2010. So really, all of these big contacts are going to look like a bargin once the uncapped year starts.
I’ve said this before many time. Al wants to win now!! He has done everything possible to put the Raiders in a position to win now. Money, salary caps have NEVER been an issue for Al and they won’t be this time either.
by TheRaiderWay on Jun 9, 2008 1:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
doesn’t the fact that they’re hiring a salary cap expect make you think they might be worried about, you know…. the salary cap? Cash certainly isn’t an issue for the Raiders, but the cap is an issue for every team.
Also, win now mindsets are what got us in the place to begin with. We went into win now mode with ancient players like Tim Brown, Jerry Rice, Rich Gannon, Warren Sapp, etc., and we’ve been the worst team in football the last 5 years. High priced veterans are terrible options when compared to low cost draft picks. Unfortunately Al hasn’t drafted or signed well, and we’ve been left with terrible teams.
As far as the uncapped 2010 year, thats a long ways off. Owners like Al and Jerry Jones might be licking their chops, but there is no way the rest of the league lets that happen. It definitely not something you can start to build a team around.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
i hear you guys. I’m just saying there is a lot of expectations and optimism from the blog owner. with all the moves I would be excited too, but i dont know if I would have such high expectations. Even as an eagle fan I’m excited for the year but I know we could easily be a 9-7 team if mcnabb plays like shit and without a doubt the hardest division in the NFL.
by Joe_D on Jun 8, 2008 10:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
it jsut sounds like
a lot of raiders fans are expecting a 11-5, 12-4 season , which im not saying isnt possible, but that’s some LOFTY ass expectations.
by Joe_D on Jun 8, 2008 10:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm expecting 6-10
but I could see 8-8 as entirely possible.
by RaiderPete on Jun 8, 2008 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
11-5 is a bit LOFTY
I havent heard that number get thrown around 10 wins is the most ive heard(laoren) but we do have a lot of optimism for 09, the players have it, the owner has it. We know in the NFL nothing is guarranted but around .500 will meet expectations
After my umbilical cord was cut, silver and black spewed out!!
by Beastusmaximus on Jun 8, 2008 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm in...
...among those with LOFTY expectations that is! We all know that many of the games that we lost as of late were by slim margins. Others, resulted from mistake after mistake. Not to mention those games in which we were profoundly out played. Keep in mind that we have consistantly been inconsistant at the QB position. That we have had O-lines that have performed poorly, and that we have not been able to stop most opposing backs from grinding us down. We have been on the field way to long on “D”, and then off the field in a hurry on “O”. I am here to tell ya that the tide has turned. That 11-5 season is here. It’s going to be as hard to keep the three backs on the field (ie sharing the rock) as it will be to keep them off of the field (ie 4th & punt). All three of them are 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th down backs. All three are red zone backs…well maybe Fargus will be the least affective in the red zone. All three are goal line backs. Fargus has some catching up to do in the “good hands” department. All three are good for breaking 15-20yd runs. Only DMAC suites the slot. Only DMAC is a threat to go the distance at anytime, from anywhere on the field. How this unfolds is gonna be interesting but in Raider history it has been done before. In Russell we have consistancy that has been lacking since Gannon. He has had a chance to learn the play book, get stronger, slimmer, quicker, and is ready to play. This team is young , fast, and hungry. The offense won’t bogg down as in recent years. We now will be able to not only move the chains but score. Far less 50+ attempts for Seabass! The “D” is as fast as the offense. Dispite popular belief our DTs will be able to stop the run, you’ll see. I think that there are 4 positions that we need to count on for a 11-12 win season. (2) DTs and (2) OTs, that’s it. Everywhere else we are SOLID! I CAN NOT WAIT! I hope yall remember this. I do. LOFTY yes, attainable…yes.
Long Live Da Nation.
by Sharpe on Jun 8, 2008 6:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Why are the DT all of a sudden
going to do something they’ve never done?
Why is a first year QB suddenly going to brind consistency to the QB position.
What exactly is a 4th down back?
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winning is a mind set as much as anything else
In the days of yore the Raiders knew they were going to win, the other team knew it also.
For a brief time Gannon willed this team to victory but then he got hurt and all hell broke loose. Now the Raiders think they are going to lose and they do, it is Kiffin’s job to get the winning feeling back. For damn sure Russell is not used to losing, so hopefully he will be the guy who wills them back to victory. The most important factor in this season is Russell obviously, but the schedule is also a major factor. A few years ago the Raiders were simply over matched against almost all the teams they played, that is not the case this year.
To be honest I will be very disappointed in a .500 season, and sure Al will be too.
The Raiders have not been losing because of the defense, it has been an offense that thinks 14 pts. a game is a major success.
by Laoren on Jun 8, 2008 7:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the mind set BUT
Aside from Gibril we did nothing for our biggest problem, stopping the run
Especially playing in run heavy AFC west, even if were down only by a few in the 4th, teams can easily run the clock out, their are too many holes for a 11-12 win season, O line is forgettable when pass blocking, Fargas misses an average of 5 games a season, Javon is on his last legs, Russell is unproven, WR is a ??, the best player is the punter, OLB? i can keep going we were 4-12 for a reason
u guys are setting urself for a big dissapointment 9-7 will be our record in 09
After my umbilical cord was cut, silver and black spewed out!!
by Beastusmaximus on Jun 8, 2008 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
9-7?
Well, first of all, after 4-12, 9-7 would not be a disappointment. But, the “too many holes’ that you refer to are the problems of last season and there has been major improvement in every phase of the the team so there is good reason to expect a 10, 11 win season for the very reason that Laoren has stated before.
Regarding stopping the run. There is a lot more to it then just Gibril Wilson. Sands had personal problems last season that retarded his progress and his conditioning. He will be better this season and that alone will be a difference maker when it comes to stopping the run. Moreover, the whole team will ride based upon how well JaMarcus handles being a starter and running an offense built especially around him. If he is able to run the offense at least compentently, i.e. like Ben Rothlisberger’s first year with the Steelers, then the Raiders will have an offense that not only scores a lot points but stays on the field more and keeps the defense off. The defense will be fresher and less worn out and opposing teams will have to pass to catch up and that plays right into our definite strength.
by TheRaiderWay on Jun 9, 2008 2:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This team was terribad at stopping the run
and the only addition we’ve made to our run defense is a safety. Don’t get me wrong, safeties are important in stopping the run, but this team has some very fundamental rush defense issues. Like, the d-line and the linebackers.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at what Sanders Did for Indy:
I always point to Bob Sanders return to Indy in 2006 as an example of how a team can go from worst to first in run defense based on their scheme when they have a run stuffing safety.
Pride And Poise!!!
by saint on Jun 10, 2008 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bob Sanders is the best defensive player in football
Gibril Wilson is a good safety. Wilson is going to help a ton but he, and the linebackers, are going to need someone to keep the other teams linemen off of them. I don’t see anyone that can do that on the team.
by RaiderPete on Jun 10, 2008 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True...
...very true. I was pleased with Kiffin’s philosophies last year and am glad that he has remained. It will be his job to unite the wills of this team. I think that they are all in. I think that they will win because the will to win will be fortified by more than sufficeint talent. We now are not out matched. When the ball is snapped and they realize that they are no longer outmatched, but actually begin to dominate play after play after play, the “mind set” required to become a perenial winner will solidify this team and once again we will be a force to be reckoned with. My friend, that day is at hand! We are going to shock the NFL and it is going to be dramatic. In the past two seasons, the defense, even after valient efforts, has allowed teams to “make a play” when we needed another stop, dispite being put in really bad situations by our offense time and time again. But you are right, we have lost because of our offense…to few points, inconsistancies everywhere, mistakes, negative yardage, 3 and outs, punts, punts, punts and more punts! Those days have come to an abrupt end. Everyone is in…get ready to be shocked!
Long Live Da Nation!
by Sharpe on Jun 8, 2008 8:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
eagles fan here
I think if the Raiders can have the same defensive success they had two years ago 8-8 could be in the mix—unless Russell struggles. I wouldn’t call going from 4-12 to 8-8 a disappointment either.
by Joe_D on Jun 9, 2008 8:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I still believe in 9-7
We have a very easy schedule after barely losing most of the games from last season. We have an improved passing game (if we can pass block) and a better D-Line (our two biggest problems from last season) But there’s one thing that will determine our success or failure this season. The O-Line. It was good run blocking last season, but pass blocking had, and I think still has, issues pass blocking. It doesn’t matter how many speed threats or playmakers we have at WR if Russell can’t get the ball off. I also think the D-Line hasn’t done much to improve the run D other than move Kelly to DT. Sands has to step up this season or else we’re doomed (and so is Kiffin) Everything else is set for us to go around 11-5, but the O-Line and Sands have too many issues and I don’t have too much faith in either, that’s why I put us as 7-9 to 9-7.
"Lightning has Struck, Wearing Silver and Black"- Super Bowl XVIII
by KA1Z3R on Jun 9, 2008 8:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You cannot gauge a team from year to year
because the dynamics change so much. Your concern about pass blocking is valid off what we say last year, but this is another year. Last year it was clear that Kiffin was trying to run down the clock, a very predictable offense, hand off to Fargas or whatever back was running for two downs, then pass on 3rd. Defenses had no concern about the Raiders making them pay for an all out rush. They had no deep threat nor did they have a breakaway runner on a dump out pass or draw. It is pretty easy to defense if you cannot get burned. Couple that with two passers that could not throw deep and for an O line you are asking an awful lot to protect the QB. The first time McFadden breaks for a 30 yd. gain on a 3rd and 5 passing down either through the run or short pass, the defenses will quit the all out blitz.
Do you honestly think that the NE O line is better than the Raiders? No, they are not, it is just that Brady kills a team that blitzes NE. You have to make teams pay for the blitz, and without a QB you cannot.
As for stopping the run, that is easy, just get your offense to score a few TD’s. Teams cannot run out the clock or control the ball if they are 10-14 pts. behind. I certainly agree that Sands was a huge disappointment last year but Warren is a force so have less concern there. I have always felt the Raiders have a gaping hole at strong side LB, that has not been corrected. I just feel strongly that any kind of offensive output will conceal perceived weaknesses in the Raider team. Two years ago the Raider defense against the run was considered excellent, pass defense was the supposed problem, last year the entire defense was considered a problem. In both cases the real problem was an offense almost entirely non-existent. Sure we had nice running stats, but unless you score TD’s, that is all superficial.
by Laoren on Jun 9, 2008 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
New Englands o-line isn't better than ours?
You’ve got to be kidding me.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where does this easy schedule talk come from?
Buffalo, San Deigo twice, Saints, Jets, Ravens, Panthers, Patriots, Texans and Buccaneers.
Those are teams that are either elite, were borderline playoff teams, or had unexpected down years and should bounce back. These are teams that should beat us. Now, they won’t all beat us, but it’s possible that we drop a game at Denver or something too.
6-10 is realistic. 8-8 is a definite possibility. If we’re 4-12 again heads should roll.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To Raider Pete...
...a 4th down back is one in which you have the confidence to get the 1st down when it’s 4th and a yard or two because they deliver for you time and time again. I think Bush & DMAC are 4th down backs more so than Fargus, but that is the just of what I meant.
...Russell, in his 1st year of any significance, will bring consistancy because he won’t be on the QB carousel that has been so prevalent in the Raider backfield for the past few years. Consistancy because win or loose, the receivers will develope sense of his tendancies, as will the backs. The O-line will become accustomed to his cadences. Zack Miller said it best when he said he is working on being there for him, an outlet when he’s in trouble, someone to look for routinely. That all takes reps, timing, confidence, in essence…a degree of consistency. Because Russell won’t be jerked from under center, he’ll bring consistancy to the Raider QB position. In any case…that’s how.
Long Live Da Nation
by Sharpe on Jun 9, 2008 7:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Over time Russell will bring consistency
but as far as ‘08 is concerned he’s just another turn in the carousel. Him and the receivers haven’t developed that chemistry YET. It will come, but it’s not here yet, it’s not something that happens over the course of an offseason or one year, it takes time.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
PS ...
...you saw how willing Kiffin was to go for it on 4th down last year! Just wait and see how many successful 4th down conversions we have now that we have legitamate 4th down backs! You’ll see!
I really just can’t wait!
by Sharpe on Jun 9, 2008 7:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Regarding the schedule...
...We’ll win our division. Our western schedules are identicle except for 2 games: Raiders vs: Ravens, Texans
Chiefs vs: Titans, Bengals
Broncos vs: Jags, Browns
Chargers vs: Pittsburg, Indy
Every other game is verses common opponients. We are a drastically improved team proven or not, we are a drastically improved team. We don’t need to be 11-5. We need to win the division. If we need to be 11-5 to win the division, then so be it. If we can accomplish that, we will have grown emmensely and could go in to the post season poised to make a run.
by Sharpe on Jun 9, 2008 8:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Win our division?!?
huh, the chargers are a team that is made to beat us. We cant stop the run they have a good running game. We’re a run first team they have Jamal Williams….....unless Mcfadden runs all over them and sets the single season rushing record, twice against the bandwaggon bolts we’re not winning the division
After my umbilical cord was cut, silver and black spewed out!!
by Beastusmaximus on Jun 9, 2008 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
the chargers are one of the 3 best teams in the league right now, there is no way we de-throne them this year. In time? Yes. Not this year.
by RaiderPete on Jun 9, 2008 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sp?...
identical
good nite all
Long Live Da Nation
by Sharpe on Jun 9, 2008 8:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe so, maybe no...
OK, so the Bolts have owned us. I promise you, the Raiders are a different team. We all know that their defense poses problems for us, but they have been playing a team in Oakland that has not been right from the coaching staff to offensive schemes with respect to coordinator & O-line coaches, to poor rushing, to recievers that could not get open (even Brown & Rice), to the QB issues, to countless other issues that have as of late have begun to look a great deal better. Truely, we have been fielding wounded teams. Take this example of the TEs. Gates is the man, right? But in the 2 games in 2007, Zach Miller, in his rookie year, out performed him. He will again this year and it’s in part because we’ll cover better than they will. But look…
Game # 6 2007: Gates 3 rec, 58yds, 0 TDs. Miller 3rec, 17yds, 1 TD
Game#17 2007: Gates 6 rec, 62yds, 0 TDs. Miller 8rec, 84yds, 0TDs
Point is it wasn’t until the last game of the season that Russell and Miller really had any significant time together on the field. Nor did Russell take a significant amount of snaps with the 1st team all of last year in practice during the season. Where as the Bolts didn’t have those sorts of issues.
I understand the Nation’s frustrations, I have been a Raider fan since 1969, but I promise you, this is a team that is going to be hard to beat. We are not going to be pummeled by anyone. What we don’t outright win, will be close, and the loses of the past, the ridicule, and Kiffin as well, have this team ready to win. All the pieces are in place. All we need at this point is solid play from the 4 tackles. You’ll see.
Again, I can’t wait!
Lond Live Da Nation
by Sharpe on Jun 10, 2008 4:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Another Hall of Famer outplayed by Miller...
...go look, Miller in his rookie season, outplayed Gonzalez also.
Take care
Long Live Da Raiders
by Sharpe on Jun 10, 2008 5:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not true
In both games Gonzalez had less catched for more yards. Also, there is a lot more to the TE position than balls caught. Gonzalez’s receiving numbers have been hurt the last few years because the Chiefs o-line has been so bad, so he’s been kept in as a blocker.
3 catches for 58 yards, and a 28-14 drubbing.
3 catches for 17 yards and a TD, blown out 28-14.
6 catches for 62 yards, a 10.3 yards per catch average. Trounced the other team 30-17.
8 catches for 84 yards, a 10.5 yards per catch average. Demolished 30-17.
I wouldn’t say that Miller outperformed Gates by any stretch of the imagination, and we were blown out so what does it matter if you think our TE did better catching the ball? Also, lets not forget that the Chargers have a few more targets to spread the ball around to, wheras we only had Miller as a reliable recieving threat.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Miller is going to be very good. If he and Russel develop some good chemistry they could be the staple of our offense for a long time to come. But lets not start comparing them to a future hall of famer and the best TE in football today.
You keep saying this is a different team, but what makes you say that? All of the improvements to the squad has been in places were were already strong (RB’s and CB’s) while the big weaknesses were left unaddressed (DT and O-Line). Russel and McFadden and Miller are going to be the core of our offense, but right now they’re just rookies and a second year TE. This ship has definitely turned around, but we’ve got a lot of ground to make up before we can talk about taking the division back.
by RaiderPete on Jun 10, 2008 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not the point...
...yes, everyone including me knows Gates and Gonzalez are headed to Canton. I also am well aware of the fact that catches are not the sole critiria in judging a TE. And that SD had many more targets to spread the ball around to only makes my point. I eluded to that previously in the blog. Now we have recievers that can get open. Backs that can run the screen, swing more effectively, and throw passes. A QB that is not a sitting duck. A legitimate kick returner (vs. Carr…straight ahead, full steam, in to the pile and Higgins…uneffective by any measure). A far better red zone offense. The list goes on and on. Believe it or not, the starting D-line will probably be Burgess, Kelly, Warren, and Spires. They are going to be formidable group. And the back 6 (of 7) are amount the best in the league.
In any case, that we got beaten and badly was not the point. Last years final outcome in those games in the west, specifically SD, was not the point. The point is that since 2002 our divisional foes have played a far less prepared team than this team will be come September. We are a far more talented team with key players set to remain in there positions barring injury. We have a coaching staff that has remained in tact for a second consecutive season for the first time this decade (almost).
In my humble opinion, the West better come ready to play harder than they have in a very long time because, in this 2008 season, we are not going to be the doormat that we have been. We are poised to take the division, this year. You’ll see. And if I’m wrong, I’ll be more surprised than I will if I’m right. Not disappointed, surprised.
I think that we are going to be a formidable opponient. Be prepared for that. I guess we’ll see won’t we.
Peace,
Long Live Da Nation!
by Sharpe on Jun 11, 2008 5:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
...I’ll meet ya at a game or two R.Pete
I’ll buy you a beer.
Peace
by Sharpe on Jun 11, 2008 5:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wish you could
I only get to admire the Raiders from afar any more, haven’t lived in the Bay area for a while now.
by RaiderPete on Jun 11, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very exciting. If McFadden keeps it together he will be a great pro.
by justin3007 on Jun 22, 2008 2:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















