Raiders Future QB Options
Well it seems more and more that Gradkowski might be starting next week. Russell got benched again and Gradkowski came in and led us on what would have been a game-winning 2:00 minute drill if only DHB didn't create an interception on a pass he should have caught in the red zone.
If Gradkowski is starting, you know Cable wouldn't be doing it unless..........Davis might be wanting him to? If Al didn't want Grad starting, you bet that he'd make sure it didn't happen. Could Al finally be seeing that Russell isn't the future of this team? It's clear from the post-game interview with Gradkowski that he already is a better leader and is definitely a better QB.
So what of QB options after this season? Next year is uncapped after all so Russell can be cut without cap ramifications leaving Davis plenty of dollars to throw at a newer shinier QB. I've done a post on this before yes, but let's take a look at some other QB choices.
Colt McCoy
The Texas Torpedo, the guy I've always wanted. But now my want for him is steadily declining as this college season has gone on. Though Al may be wanting him more and more.
Fleet-footed, tough runner, rocket-launcher arm, everything Al loves. Accurate, great leadership, tremendously hard worker, everything Russell doesn't have. So why am I not wanting him quite as much?
Well from extensively watching Texas, he has a tough time getting going. Slow starts to games and usually games versus the likes of Baylor, Central Florida, and the like. Not exactly great competition to help you prepare for the NFL game. But if anyone can properly prepare, it's Colt. Unlike Russell, he actually works towards success.
He also makes some bad reads, but he'd be willing to actually work and cooperate with the great QB coaching staff Oakland has. McCoy reminds me a lot of a Joe Flacco except more mobile and a faster developer.
Jason Campbell/Bruce Gradkowski
I'm very interested to see how Gradkowski fares as a starter. From what we've seen in limited action, he appears to have really gotten some accuracy issues worked out during the offseason and is clearly capable of leading us downfield. If he can do this as a starter, then I have a plan to propose.
Keep Gradkowski through the offseason
Bring in Jason Campbell as a free agent
Have the two compete for the starting spot
Campbell has good mobility, good arm strength, and once again has a good work ethic. Accuracy and good reads are definitely spotty, but much better than Russell.
And competition only makes you better, this is especially true with QB's. Whoever gets the starting spot would have definitely earned it instead of the fake competition in camp this year between Russell and Garcia/Gradkowski.
Plus this plan allows us to use all our draft picks towards improving the team to help the QB more.
Ryan Mallett
via friendsoftheprogram.files.wordpress.com
Several people have mentioned Ryan Mallett, though I'm against this option.
Russell-esque arm strength, good speed, but he's also very inaccurate and makes some bad decisions. I don't really know much about him, but from what I've watched of him it doesn't look good. For a team looking for a down-the-road replacement QB option, then here's your perfect long-term project. But the Raiders need immediate success and a game manager. Mallett doesn't fit that mold.
Though I could see Davis drafting him.
Sam Bradford
Another move I'm against, but one I could live with.
Minus a bad injury to start this season and Bradford has done everything very well. Amazing completion percentages, nice deep ball, decent mobility especially in the pocket, and once again a hard worker. All this with average receiver talent, a great TE, and good running back checkdown options.
Sounds like he's been playing for the Raiders all along.
He's very young and is already playing at the level of Colt McCoy; translation: immediate success with a high developmental ceiling. Lack of experience could be an issue, but he's got the skill set for success and the mentality to keep getting better. Davis should be drooling over this guy.
Tim Tebow
via thewholegardenwillbow.files.wordpress.com
God save us if we draft Tim Tebow. Aka, Vince Young 2.0 (and not the Vince Young we're seeing now)
The only reason this could be good is that he can run and thus avoid pressure. But he runs way too much. It's his first instinct and intention on every play. Now who else was like that?
Vince Young
Personally I don't what a guy who's only really good at running on our team. He makes some bad reads and really bad throws and is very lucky that he has talent at Florida to make up for it.
Other draft possibilities that I'm just too much against to go into detail about:
- Ricky Stanzi- interception prone
- Jake Locker- very inconsistent on a weekly basis, not overly impressive
- Jimmy Clausen- I'm an ND fan but he's only good because of the insane amount of weapons he has
- Jevan Sneed- see Jake Locker, though I like his mobility and leadership
A draft stocked with QB's and a good free agent prospect in Jason Campbell, and even possibly the game manager we need in Gradkowski already on the team. Which would be your choice?
0 recs |
45 comments
|
Comments
I think Russell will compete for the job next season with a veteran and who knows Gradkowski might catch fire (please god!)
I dont think Al will want to give up on JaMarcus completely and want to see how he reacts to true competition which in retrospect is what we should have done this year as I think handing JaMarcus the job sent the completely wrong message.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 16, 2009 5:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Having said that
If we were to draft a rookie I would have to go with McCoy as the guy I would feel most comfortable with but we would HAVE to sit him for a year and not expect miracles overnight.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 16, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love for us to
Draft a great O-Line man don’t know who because I don’t watch college football but nonetheless I think we should draft a great O-Line man, get a Veteran QB, and sit Russell until he is READY to start.
Wake me up if we win
by nishal26 on Nov 16, 2009 6:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Draft
We need run stoppers, and we are positioned to get one of the top three DT’s turning out.
That should be our first pick. Who? Obviously: Ndamukong Suh, Terrence Cody, Gerald McCoy.
Next, we need some line depth on the offensive line, and if by some miracle, Ciron Black is available by the second round, get him.
Otherwise, I’d go for another run stopper DT for our second round pick as well:D’Anthony Smith, or Tyson Alaualu.
For third round I’d look for the best run stopping linebacker available, or if we pick Cody in the first, we may need to go for DT Cam Thomas to complement and rotate for the bulge, unless we read the draft differently and can pick him up later.
For fourth and fifth I’d be going for the tall WR’s, minimum 6’3", but more Riley Cooper, Danario Alexander and David Nelson.
For sixth round we need to draft a sumo wrestler/dietician to impress upon J. Russell and T. Cody the virtues of proper diet. And if they deviate, they’ll have hell to pay.
Forget about getting another QB, the three we got are fine. (I know, I know, but if the average time to turn out in the NFL is 4-5 years, we should stick with him. And when he does finally realize that he’s got to live film like Jimmy Hendrix lived guitar practice, well…)
Our Rookie wideouts need the same kind of time and patience, and it is good that they’ll be growing with the quarterback at about the same pace.
I’d keep Cable too. He tends to go for it on fourth, makes interesting play calls, and has a nose for momentum changing opportunities.
This may be heretical, but if we get Ndamukong Suh, then a losing season is a winner.
Let’s keep seasoning up Russell, though I’m not against throwing in Gradowski once in awhile. Season up Heyward Bey, Murphy, and that TE Meyers.
Let’s introduce some hybrid half-back/fullback plays for Gary Russell, skimpier outfits for the cheerleaders and larger nacho bowls for the fans.
by xville on Nov 17, 2009 1:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Completly agree
We don’t need to spend a bunch of money on an un-proven player. Especially if it’s Al Davis picking the QB in the draft. Lord help us.
by ButtMunch on Nov 18, 2009 1:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I want...
To draft the Top O-Line man. Brandon Spikes. And sign Jason Cambell. Jason had a great TE in Washinton. And he will love to have Zach Miller. But, we need a vetran WR. I hope Javon steps up.
by Remix. on Nov 16, 2009 6:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Walker
He’s not stepping up. He wants to step out and for good. If you want a veteran wide receiver, there will be some on the market. There always is.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Drafting
You’re not getting both the top offensive lineman and Brandon Spikes. I’d take the lineman over the linebacker.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 7:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just saw on Raiders.com that Gradkowski is questionable this week with a hamstring
didnt make any announcements but definitely sounded like he wants to make a change this week.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 16, 2009 6:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
oh no
Davis will say he’s injured so that Russell can start, of course I get it now.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 16, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I thought that
but we will see I guess, he did also speak highly of Charlie Frye so if Gradkowski is injured it will really test his conviction on benching Russell. Also does the fact that Frye is being discussed mean that JaMarcus falls to 3 on the depth chart?
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 17, 2009 3:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jake Locker
Jake Locker- very inconsistent on a weekly basis, not overly impressive
That’s because he plays for the University of Washington. Last year, Locker gets hurt and team goes winless. This year, he’s back and the team has at least won a few games despite the Pac-10 being very impressive with possibly five six-win teams. He’s a very good quarterback.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 6:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i agree
I like Locker a lot, he has fire and that “it” factor, plus he has wheels
by nateroddick20 on Nov 16, 2009 9:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jimmy Clausen
He’d be my pick. He completes over 67 percent of his passes while averaging 305 yards per game. You, KA1Z3R, say that he’s only good because of the weapons he has; however, Colt McCoy has an array of weapons and he’s the guy you’ve wanted all along as you have admitted.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 6:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
McCoy has Shipley
and that’s about his only consistent weapon. Everyone else is kinda iffy.
Meanwhile Clausen has a great TE, two of the best receivers in the country, and depth at receiver equivalent to starters on a lot of average college teams.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 16, 2009 7:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Texas
They play in a spread offense. They have weapons everywhere. You have to have guys that are skilled to run that style.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they also run pro style
they run a mix much like Florida
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 16, 2009 7:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not another rookie quarterback please
this franchise has proven it’s not good at drafting and grooming a quarterback and with the toxic atmosphere that is currently in Oakland a rookie QB would more than likely flame out like Russell.
I’m for bringing in a veteran (who? we’ll see it’s too early to know who’ll be available at this point) and for improving the talent around the quarterback position.
The Raiders need to find the next Gannon, Plunkett or even Jeff Hostetler who can grab the reins of the club and play quarterback at a professional level.
by sirbed on Nov 16, 2009 6:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Vick
I’m willing to take a chance on him to be honest with you.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 7:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My biggest concern with Vick
is that the reason he hasn’t done much in Philadelphia is that he’s done physically. He was a player who relied on his legs to make plays and if he’s lost a step he won’t be effective.
Remember his career completion percentage is only 53.7 and that’s playing mostly in a west coast type offense where most QB’s are over 60%. (Russell is at 51.6%)
We’ll see whose available soon enough and I’m not saying I wouldn’t take a chance on Vick but I’m guessing there might be some better targets out there in the off-season.
by sirbed on Nov 16, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It could also be that he is getting back into being a pro football player again
I think you can expect a massive improvement in his second season back
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 17, 2009 3:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Based on what evidence?
He’ll be a year older next year but outside of that I don’t see why he’d improve especially since he has played so little this year.
He’s in a offense that he knows well in Philadelphia and he’s not playing so why would he be better next year playing for a team in Oakland that would run an offense he’s never played?
It’s fine to say you think he’ll be good and hey I’m not saying you’re wrong but I’m asking why do you think he’ll be better?
by sirbed on Nov 17, 2009 3:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tim Tebow
At this point, I wouldn’t even mind him. I know some people question whether or not he can be an NFL quarterback. Still, he’s a winner. If Florida wins the national title again with him under center, it’s something I’d consider if the situation arises. At that point, he will have cemented his legacy as one of the greatest leaders of all time. He’d bring in a winning mentality. They said Vince Young couldn’t do it, but he’s developing nicely as someone who wins games. He just flat out wins football games. I think Tebow can be that guy. There are still at least four other quarterbacks, I’d take before him. I’m just saying that if the situation arises, consider your options.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 7:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I’d rather have Tebow than Mallet, locker, or Snead.
but for me it’s really between bringing in Campbell (option of choice), drafting McCoy, or drafting Bradford. But if Tebow’s there in the second and we haven’t drafted or signed a QB then why not?
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 16, 2009 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anybody but JaMarcus
I’d be so happy to watch a season of a guy like Gradkowski. With our improving run game and o-line and with the receivers a year older (and hopefully Schillens for an entire season) I’d be satisfied.
After JaMarcus, it takes so little. I mean, can you imagine having a quarterback who can actually lead you on drives down the field? We haven’t had that for almost two years.
by RLangford on Nov 16, 2009 8:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
At least we know we didn't make a mistake not taking Quinn
How bad are the two QBs at the top of that draft.
I mean Russell and Quinn are just historically bad. Unbelievably awful.
by RLangford on Nov 16, 2009 8:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
NFL Draft 2007
The quarterback class included JaMarcus Russell, Brady Quinn, John Beck, Drew Stanton, Kevin Kolb and Trent Edwards taken in the first three rounds. Kolb and Edwards appear to be the only ones with futures in this league of the six and we don’t really know about Kolb yet since he’s backing up McNabb. He has played well when called upon, though.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 16, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a great group of quarterbacks so far
It’s too early to tell obviously but none of those guys look like much right now.
Kolb played well this season and Edwards has had the most overall success but the jury is still out on them.
I think it’s unfair to say Quinn is an all time bust as he’s only started 7 games which isn’t much of an opportunity. Still right now that class is looking pretty bad.
by sirbed on Nov 17, 2009 3:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who Dey, Raider Fans
If you want a shot at winning against us, you guys need to start Gradkowski. Mobile quarterbacks have messed us up this year(See Roethlisberger, Ben, who despite us beating Pitt, was their lead rusher). If J-Marc starts, it could get ugly really fast for you guys. Not trying to troll or anything like that. Just stating facts. Best of luck to you on Sunday. I’m worried about Asomugha(sp?) matching up on Ochocinco. He may take 85 out of the game completely because he’s a damn good corner.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 1:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Asomugha
He’s the best corner in the league, but he stays on his side of the field. If Ochocinco is moved around, he’ll get his.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 17, 2009 6:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True
I forgot that he or any other receiver could line up against Routt. Routt is horrible, he gets burned on every play it seems.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Ced doesn't play
It will be a committee of Scott, Leonard, and shudder LJ.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didnt know
- * was the code for bold.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 9:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Routt
He isn’t the second corner, though. Johnson is and he is very prone to getting beat.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 17, 2009 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love it if we released Russell(ain’t happening, I know). Drafting Tebow might be okay especially since we have Louis Murphy, so if he’s in the second round then get him. I’d really draft a defensive lineman for the first pick. Then maybe a QB if Tebow is still around. Signing Jason Campbell would be awesome to compete with Bruce, Tebow, and Russell for the job. I hope Bruce does well and that we could see a glimmer of hope and it appears he’s a real leader whereas Russell could care less about leading anyone. He’d rather blame the whole team for the loss while he sits back and receives a huge paycheck for his crappy numbers. One of these days Davis will have to wake up and see that Russell is not the elite player he thought he drafted and will take action.
I’d like to see possibly:
Jason Campbell in a Raider uniform for a veteran QB to compete with Bruce.
Draft a DL with first pick.
Draft Tebow if he’s still around in the second.(I don’t think he’d mind being the 3rd stringer to start off with. Joe Montana worked his way up, so why can’t he.)
McCoy, Bradford, and maybe Mallet may command big money to sign so I think it’s out of the question with Russell’s contract. I think we need a leader at QB that’ll motivate the whole team and rally to win us games. We wouldn’t be that bad a team if the QB spot got more production opening up the run game that has been good. If the offense is on the field more, then our defense will actually be able to rest more instead of being on fumes by the 3rd-4th quarter. 3 and outs have got to stop. Lechler should not be constantly on the field kicking punt after punt. Lechler’s awesome(thank God), but it’d be awesome if we didn’t see so much of him.
by Walker Wallace on Nov 17, 2009 7:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
QB
JC would be good, but the o-line is questionable. However, it is an improvement over Washington (barely).
Memo to the Crypt Keeper: NO QB IN ROUNDS 1-3!! TOO MANY NEEDS TO TAKE QB!! OL, DL, LB, CB. I would fix DL, then OL, then CB, then LB, then whatever else is needed. CB because someone needs to light Chris Johnson’s fire.
Touchdown, Ronnie Brown Edition!
by 23_Wind on Nov 17, 2009 3:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we should use our 1st round pick on a QB
We need a veteran, not an unproven player. I think Jamarcuss could be great but not till he has passion for the game. Cuz right now he’s too busy buying ice and counting his money. He will never be good till he loves the game and right now he doesn’t have it.
I think right now we should start Gradowski. He’s a leader, waaay more accurate, and doesn’t have slot of arm strength but can make it happen ( WR Miller, 49 yes pass from Gradowski in the preseason game against the Cowboys). I don’t like Cambell much. From what I’ve seen he’s a big ass chicken. He’s scared to get hit and not a great QB. we have a pretty bad offensive line, we need a QB who isn’t afraid.
I think we should draft an offensive lineman first but if we do draft a QB I’d pick Bradford. I like him, decent players and still makes the pass, great accuracy and good arm strength and can move. My man. What I don’t like about Bradford is he is injury prone. Back to back injuries on his shoulder.? And he’s a QB.? scary thought. McCoy doesn’t seem that bad. Texas plays well and he has an arm and acurate and can run. Sounds great. But we really need a linemen.
I would kill Al Davis myself if they draft Tebow. Oh god. He’s overrated. The only way I wouldn’t be mad if we took him in the second round maybe. But if were drafting a QB I’d love Bradford or McCoy. Plz plz plz.! Not Tebow….. Omg…
by ButtMunch on Nov 18, 2009 2:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i agree
But we dont need any of those rookie QB’s. they are all overrated. Ofcourse I may be wrong but i think only Bradford would become a good everyday QB in the NFL but I think he has a short career ahead of him since it takes relatively little contact to hurt his shoulder since he first hurt it. I saw both injuries and i gotta say i’ve been drove into the ground harder and by bigger guys without pads and i’m a little smaller than he is.
by 211 on Nov 19, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mallett is great- but not under pressure;
He is NOT a good fit for the Raiders as they stand; weak blocking and poor run game. He would panic under pressure but is actually excellent a picking apart defensive sets and running a drive.
It’s really not important that we get an outstanding QB,… look what Denver has done with Orton. Everyone here whined and complained that they were getting a mediocer QB and then shut up about week 4. It’s not about the draft, it’s about developing the team and getting rid of what DOESN’T work… i.e. JaMarcuss
by Joesickness on Nov 18, 2009 1:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
GRADOWSKI STARTS.!
idk how many people know this already but Cable is benching Jamarcuss.! and Gradowski is going to start.! WOO HOO.!
by ButtMunch on Nov 18, 2009 4:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We’ll get to see what Bruce will really do and if this lights a fire in Russell to become a more serious QB. If not, I feel next year will be Russ’s last year in a silver and black uniform.
by Walker Wallace on Nov 19, 2009 5:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
J-Russ blah!
No QB in the 1st round. We need o-line help right now. Draft or trade, just fix the o-line fast!
We just benched Russell. Good! Now we have a mediocre QB that can actually learn something from our QB coach. if we fix the o-line Grad wont have to be so mobile and can work on his accuracy in the pocket in a real game setting and who knows maybe turn into a decent QB? Then we can release Russell or trade him for atleast 7th round pick if a team is dumb enuff too lol, bcuz Russell cant comprehend what a coach wants well enuff to be decent.
I mean we had to dumb down our offense for the man to learn! HE’S THE QB! WHAT!? That says alot about the guys capabilty to lead right there! Sorry I just don’t have any faith in Russell. when we drafted him I was like “NNNOOOO!” It was obvious when he was at LSU that he didnt have the mental capacity to be a leader! and on top of that he was already a huge QB then nearly qualified as an o-lineman after holding out to get a hefty contract for being a college star. That told you right there that he just wanted lots of money so he could buy bling and brag to friends and family about being a NFL starter (which he did and continues to do to this day). Sorry for going on and on but this guy sickens me more than Al being in love with him! I mean Al goes out on a very thin and shaky limb and proclaims you to be a future Hall of Famer, and you do nothing at all to show this man that, even though he made a bad assessment of your talent, you’ll atleast try to be a decent QB that can make a living as a journeyman!
by 211 on Nov 19, 2009 11:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















