Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bill Parcells, Jerome Bettis Lead Hall of Fame Finalists

Pride and Poison: Al Davis' Inability to "Get it"

Get it?

That's what separates success from failure. It's the question that has haunted millions before we were born, and will ultimately decide whether the species reaches the stars or winds up as cockroach feed. It's what pigeonholed the high school jock as the prototypical Doomed Male: Impressive in his physique, but unable to adapt mentally.

Football, in that sense, has always served as a microcosm for mankind's ability to survive and come to terms with it's past - if only so it can bury it in move on.

Someone must've left Al Davis out of the meeting on Human Evolution 101.

Seven years removed from the smallest sliver of Glory, Al Davis sits in his suite at the Oakland-Alameda Coliseum, slumped over in his track suit and high on morphine and memories. But memories won't save this franchise. They won't protect Michael Bush when the O-Line breaks down. They won't add longevity to Darren McFadden's knees. They certainly won't help channel the tenacity of Ken Stabler or the grit of Daryle LaMonica into the team's franchise QB.  At best, they'll serve to remind the team's aging owner of what once was, and keep the denizens of the Raider Nation drunk on what could have been.

Trophies_medium

Like the high school jock, the Raiders are hell bent on recapturing their former glory through intimidation and ridiculous claims of birthright. Don't blame them - it's the only defense mechanism they have left. Here they sit -far from the biker bars and wild cocaine parties of yore- overweight, undervalued, and covered with needle marks and tattoos that say that not now, but once, we were Kings. Meanwhile, the Manning's and the Brady's and the Roethlisberger's of the League have moved on. Daily, they step over the carcass of the Raider image that sleeps on the sidewalk, blanketed by newspapers filled with headlines preaching the formers' ability to "get it."

The factoids surrounding the Oakland police blotter's all reek of bravado, but miss out on the bigger picture: Success builds image, not the other way around. Because of this, Tom Cable has become the Pariah of the Month in the Bay Area. But we love winners more than we love ethics -always have. Had Cable had been successful in producing a winner despite Davis' antiquated game plans, his past transgressions would've been forgotten and notched up as an addition to the Raider Mystique. The same mystique that swallowed this franchise up years ago.

So what, if anything, can be done to save this team? We live in interesting times, and just as Change was sold to the world a year ago in the form of a presidential candidate, so too can the Advertising Machines sell Change to Oakland. It's time for the Emperor to step aside -or at least realize that no amount of chest-thumping will make up for poor business decisions.

Nfl_g_adavis1_580_medium

If there's any team that could show Davis the meaning of "Getting it," it's the team that started the Raiders' decent into oblivion: the New England Patriots.

The Patriots didn't reach the mountaintop because of the Tuck Rule Game: They did it because they built a machine that is self-automated, and hired the right people to work that machine. They didn't care if they fit the "Patriot Image," because images are bought and sold and revised and entirely subjective to the Won/Loss column. 

The problem, though, is that no matter how many times this Emperor is told he has no clothes, he's content on strolling through the world bare-assed and frostbitten. The pride he still clings to is the only protection he needs to weather the elements. The only change he's content with are the coins the Brady's and the Manning's and the Roethlisberger's toss into his cup as they pass him by. But it's not enough to win. It'll never be enough to restore any modicum of dignity to this team until Davis realizes that Pride and Poise have stunted this team's ability to move forward.

So, as a Raider fan, I ask that Al consider his options. Learn from your mistakes, Al. Realize that winning, not trailblazing, is the surest way to see another Super Bowl before you expire. Realize that there's no pride in losing -no matter how many "Moral Victories" you chalk up. Realize that Change is the only real way of ever "Getting It."

Most of all, Al: Just win, baby...please.

Comment 36 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At First....

I thought you maybe Copy and Pasted this post. So I googled it, and it looks pretty legit bro..Good post

by Remix. on Nov 21, 2009 12:14 PM PST reply actions  

Well...

I DID copy/paste it from the other blogs I posted it on (FanIQ and Fannation), but I did actually write it. On the tail end of a caffeine binge, but it’s all mine. :P

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 21, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

The problem began with change

Your article presupposes that Davis has not changed and remains in the past, but Al did, in fact, change. Al once pursued winning football games with a purity that Lombardi would admire. Everything was sweet when ‘just win, baby Al’ was satisfied with the narrowest margins of victory, in the last moments, using whoever could perform. Unfortunately Al changed his focus from winning football games to winning something else. This ‘something else’ can be known by acts: a callous move to L.A., benching Marcus Allen, stinting talented players and coaches such as Gruden, extorting from a vulnerable Oakland. The decline of the Raiders came with Al’s moral decline.
fn. The giving of alms to the poor (quarterback) won’t redeem him either.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 21, 2009 6:42 PM PST reply actions  

The argument can be made that Al is need of a change, since it’s obvious that the culture that’s been inherent in the system for the last 25+ years hasn’t produced. I’m in complete agreement with you in that regard. The problem may have begun with change, but that doesn’t mean that change is bad in itself. In this case, it’s a lack of it that’s doing the team in, and Oakland’s troubles seem to stem from Al’s inability to grasp that, or his sheer stubbornness to come to terms with his own failures.

That doesn’t mean that the team should change it’s philosophy just for change’s sake: It has to be with the right mindset, and with a group of people equally committed to the longterm survival and success of the team. Without that, change will only exist on the superficial level — which is where it’s been since 2003.

Good argument. I look forward to continuing it. :-)

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 21, 2009 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

No question

A return to excellence would require radical change in mindset., starting in the mind of AD who is the soul of the Raiders. That’s why obvious adjustments such as starting Gradkowski tomorrow register favorably with the Nation – as an indication that the supreme leader – by accepting Cable’s decision – is capable of sound judgment. My wish for Al is, become your better self with that characteristic focus on just winning games.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 21, 2009 8:43 PM PST reply actions  

Btw,

Gradkowski expressed this exact attitude in his last interview with Greg Papa. His single concern is to win the next (immediate) game.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 22, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Which is why I’m actually looking forward to seeing what he can produce. I had a conversation with a friend of mine recently, wherein he compared Russell to Ryan Leaf. “No,” I said. “Leaf at least showed emotion, misguided though it was.” I like that in Gradkowski. He’s not the most talented of guys, but he has a determination to win, and I think that’s what’s needed in Oakland right now. We’ll see what happens later today.

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 22, 2009 11:02 AM PST up reply actions  

We're heading over to see for ourselves

If, as an earlier post suggested a season can be divided – then this is the second ‘09-’10 season and this it’s first game.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 22, 2009 12:23 PM PST reply actions  

Not a bad start

Good start to the second ‘09-’10 season. Here’s hoping the momentum continues to build.

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 22, 2009 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Please tell me you had a handlebar moustache to twirl as you typed that. I can’t picture it any other way.

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 23, 2009 6:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Look in the mirror Al

Good post Spirit.I always thought Al would find a G.M. who had his own ideas to keep the Raiders fresh so Al could ride into the sunset with his maverick persona intact.Instead Al chooses to live in a bunker with his head buried in a pillow dreaming of past glory.I always respected Al for his accomplishments in the football world and he probably knows more about football than most but a man most come to a point when he discovers that the game has past him by. Al the problem is you and only you,the things you have done in the last 7 years are not the actions of a sane man.The time has come for you to turn over control and stop bringing shame to The Nation.This team is close and with some good moves in the upcoming off season and I don’t mean trading anymore picks to New England(hey Al does Mr Kraft have naked pictures of you??)The Raiders could make the jump to a respectable team again, but no free agent worth the money will come here as long as Al is still in control.I read a post the other day that said that Al should leave before they vote him out of The Hall of Fame and I can’t say it any better than that.

by bayparkphil on Nov 22, 2009 9:01 PM PST reply actions  

Al and the Raiders are one

So, for now, Al is wonderful.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 22, 2009 9:23 PM PST reply actions  

It's comments like that

that make me sad. Just cuz fans are tired of Al Davis doesn’t make people bad fans. Just because Al Davis owns our favorite team does not make him God.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 4:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Well...

I dont believe in god so worshiping Al doesnt bother me. I dont do it though. I think he needs a shot of reallity and that little petition was a start. I tend to defend Al though when people pray for his death and violent, inproper shit. I also think it would be sad if his legacy is tarnished.

by Remix. on Nov 23, 2009 5:15 AM PST up reply actions  

They're putting up a billboard

and I’m all for that. But something about the site just worries me about dishing money out to them. Especially when the billboard the Bill’s fans put up didn’t cost so much..

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 5:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Messagetoal.com. I already donated my $20. :-)

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 23, 2009 6:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't know.

I still want to see some numbers on paper and proof they have talked to Clear Channel about putting this up.

I’d rather see them put full page ads in the paper. Or send something to the Raiders HQ.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 6:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Well praying for someone to die is wrong.

I had enemies too in my life, but I would never pray for them to die.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 5:29 AM PST up reply actions  

I find it sad

that people like you will blindly follow Davis right into the path of a rogue freight train.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't follow anyone, except maybe Benedict XVI

I appreciate Al Davis being able to change for the better – as he did when he sanctioned Cable’s decision to start Gradkowski. When Al does the right thing there should be some acknowledgment instead of rancor and sadness – especially after what he and the Raiders gave us yesterday.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Davis reportedly

had nothing to do w/ that decision. So now you’re just coming off as a blow hard without being able to back that comment up with facts.

recs
Al and the Raiders are one

So, for now, Al is wonderful

Sure sounds like worshiping to me….

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Shove this

“Managing general partner Al Davis talked to Cable and supported the decision to bench Russell.” [Paul Wexler, Raiderbeat.com Nov. 19, 2009]

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 6:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Q: What did Al Davis say about this move, did you go back and forth on it?

“No, no. He left this up to me; this is my decision. We talked about it and he supported it.”

It was ultimately Cable’s decision.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

So it must be true because it was told to the press?

Please. You can’t have it both ways. You claim Al has to go because he controls team decisions, then reverse yourself and claim that Al doesn’t make the ultimate decision! Which is is? Whatever is convenient to trash Al Davis it seems.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

You quoted something from the press too....

So that makes your comment true?

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah right

Cable never spoke with Al before the decision and made that part up. No, I mean the spin for the press that it is Cable’s call. It’s bed time for you so stop writing because I feel compelled to answer your shit.

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

And how do you know he didn't?

You can’t back anything up either.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Answer this:

Did Cable talk with Al between the KC Cincinnati games or not?

Son-of-Blanda

by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm sure they did

but neither of us know what any conversation that was held was about.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Nov 24, 2009 4:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow, that’s the first time I’ve ever had a flame war erupt on something I wrote.. I feel like I’ve passed some sort of rite of passage now. :)

We talked baseball in the summertime, and danced with the Spirit of '59.

by Spirit_of_59 on Nov 25, 2009 6:23 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

Network_small Rich Langford

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50