Is Bruce Gradkowski for real?
What a performance from a QB that has not started since 2006. I believe Gradkowski will and
should be our QB for the SILVER and BLACK. He passed for 183yrds, 2tds, and 1int. I dont know about
you guys, but thats pretty good stats from a back up. Do you think its time for Russell to go and start
the Gradkowski era, I for one am all for it.......So NATION are you ready to believe again????
0 recs |
66 comments
Comments
No to Russell going
Maybe this will spark a fire under his ass. Let him compete for the position next year and if he doesn’t make it, let him go then.
Gradkowski being a starter? Well why not though. Gannon was a journey man til Gruden brought him to Oakland. I think we did well against the 10th ranked D in the league. Let’s see how this goes giving him a short week.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 22, 2009 5:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He made some questionable decisions today, that could've gone the other way for six
but give him some time to see. We only wanted him to be good enough to get that eight guy out of the box, and to take advantage of a deep ball when the eighth guy stays there too often.
For real? Not sure what that even means, because there’s no verdict out on him that he’s very good or anything, but capable of winning some games. I think so.
Hats off to the D, and Brandon Myers on that key strip and recovery. He and Murphy are the best thing to happen to us this year. Big ups to Tyvon, and Routt for making up for his bad to make a big stop in the backfield today.
Look forward to more turnovers from the D if Bruce can be just good enough to convert and allow us to at least get close in time of possession.
by brhynno on Nov 22, 2009 5:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
He looked rusty at times. Tried to force the ball a couple of times he shouldn’t, but also made some truly great throws. Wouldn’t even have had that interception if he hadn’t been blindsided.
by rightnasty on Nov 22, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bruce is totally for real
Gradkowski is the man, mobile, accurate, disciplined and, most importantly, a warrior. I just returned from the best game all year and I’ll tell you the two biggest weaknesses on this team, Bey and Morrison. Our defense overall is fine, but just like the key player on the O we’ve got a real dud at MLB. Had the glasses on him after he missed a couple of tackles which and what I saw was piss poor – consistently out of the action, missed tackles, shoelace attempts and blown coverages over the middle in, at least, three separate 3rd and long situations that Cincinnati converted on. At least Bey made that sideline catch for the first down. Morrison used to play well on the outside … I’ll see him again on Thursday and against Washington and if he looks anything like today you’ll hear more from me.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 22, 2009 5:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Our Defense did well
and Grad wasn’t sacked at all. Interesting.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 22, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
O-Line
Was amazing in my opinion they all did a dam good job pass blocking. They even picked up the right people when they blitzed
Wake me up if we win
by nishal26 on Nov 22, 2009 10:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Right.
So why this game and not the others. We had a healthy o-line last week….
I’m not saying it’s a conspiracy or anything just saying it’s interesting w/ a different QB and all…
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 4:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not that the line gave Bruce more time
but that Gradkowski quickly sees and reacts. Plus he often gains time on his own by moving in or out of the pocket.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 7:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gradkowski
While I don’t know if he’s for real just yet, let’s just see what happens in these remaining games. After that, we can evaluate the position and see what’s best moving forward.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 22, 2009 5:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Dallas game will prove alot
If we can win IN Dallas, on a short week, I might start getting excited for the upcoming season..But for now, lets just be glad Bruce is here
by Remix. on Nov 22, 2009 5:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
and Dallas is playing pretty bad right now too. I think we have a chance to beat them. My biggest concern going in to that game is the short turn around. Do our guys have enough thime to get healthy for the game? (Seymour?)
Although Romo got injured in the Dallas game and he’ll have a short week too…
by KiwiRaiderFan on Nov 22, 2009 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lower back - looks like he's out
but Richardson and Ellis were outstanding on the ends.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 22, 2009 6:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ellis will be beastly
More beastly than usual that is cuz of the emotional-ness of that game. Just a thought if you were a NFL Player for the Cheifs, Chargers, Broncos, or any other team and you had to play the Raiders would you give it your all and you are a Die Hard Raider fan a few years back?
Wake me up if we win
by nishal26 on Nov 22, 2009 11:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unthinkable
to be a Bronco. Tough question b/c I can’t even get past the set-up – playing on any of those teams.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 7:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gradkowski did some little things that Russell doesn't do, but I wasn't overjoyed
I was overjoyed with the win, but Gradkowski’s performance was only a part of it.
17/34 (50%) is fair, but Gradkowski only had 4 completions to wide receivers, and 3 of those were on the last drive of the game, so the Raiders offense still relies heavily on Miller and the backs for receptions.
Russell had 29 pass attempts against KC before being pulled with only 8 receptions to show for it, but his receivers and backs probably had 10 drops on the day.
The biggest thing I saw Gradkowski do was on the Murphy TD: Gradkowski looked right, pumped, then looked left and fired to Murphy. I’m still a fan of Russell, but he needs to work on doing these types of things to help get his receivers open.
After a win, and with a short week ahead of them, Gradkowski is guaranteed another start next week.
Prevent John Marshall from running the prevent defense!
by LiveAdam on Nov 22, 2009 5:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thought that throw to Chaz
Over the tops of the two defenders was impressive.
All in all, he put up better stats against Cincinnati then Roethlisberger did the week before. That’s really saying something, for a guy who many (including myself) thought he was washed up. I was seriously wrong. Maybe he’s just getting started.
by rightnasty on Nov 22, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hes 26
He was never really given the chance till now, besides in 2006. Otherwise hes been a career backup.
by Remix. on Nov 23, 2009 3:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he was very impressive imo in the press conference after the game
sounds like he really understands the game and the game plan, he actually spoke of progressing through reads amazing!
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 23, 2009 3:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
from what i saw Chaz was great
because that was a great catch and the run down on the fumble recovery was crucial also, he looks like a beast.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Nov 23, 2009 3:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unless he does horribly bad.
Like worse than Russell bad, he’s probably going to start the rest of the season. Cable already said it’s not week to week.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 4:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to remember
Roethlisberger and Flacco didn’t do any better against the Bengals defense the two games before the Raiders played them.
by rightnasty on Nov 25, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is the difference
It makes when you have a capable QB, I know Gradkowski isn’t the answer but he does give the team the best chance to win. If JR would have been benched by the 3rd or 4th game of the season the Raiders would probably have at the very least 1 more win possibly 2. It should be apparent that being down by a touchdown with JR as the QB all was lost and look how much better the D played when given a bit of time and it didn’t hurt that they knew they had a chance rather than risking injury in futile attempts knowing that the team didn’t have a chance because the QB was horrible, Bruce may not be great but he makes the entire team play better and I think the Raiders are wrong to continue to believe that Russell is going to be the future, I’d give him 2 games next season and if it isn’t 100% better then get rid of him before next season is lost instead of waiting 10 games before they finally give up. I’m sorry for being so negative on Russell but I didn’t have any faith in him whatsoever and the Raiders sit him and put a guy in who hasn’t started a game since ’06 and the result is an unlikely win but it shows just how inept Russell really is and the team needs to move forward and not just the rest of this season but next season and beyond too!
by smalljaw on Nov 23, 2009 5:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Raiders
are just catching up to what the majority of the Nation already knew. You’ll still see a few people on here sticking up for Russell, but most of us have taken off the blinders.
Russell isn’t the answer, and I’m not sure he ever will be. Even his stead fast fans are being quiet lately. The “he’s still a rookie” excuse ran out long ago. The “horrible o-line” excuse got destroyed today. That’s the same o-line Gradkowski played behind with 0, that’s zero, none, nada, zip sacks.
When the QB coach said he was regressing, and Tom Cable said he’s not where he should be, and even Al Davis admits he has to do better, well then something is wrong.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 23, 2009 6:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you see....?
Russell was sitting on the sidelines, on the bench with his headphones on. His Team had just tied the game and he was sitting there acting like he was watching his girlfirends little league football game. No interest in talking to Gradkowski or the QB coach, no spark of interest,… nothing. He is a complete Tool and obviously happy to cash the Raider Nation checks with no team loyalty what so ever. If I was a Multi-millionaire and I had to continue play this clown. I would NOT let him sit there and disrepect his team mates, the coaches, the fans and not to mention me (in this statement, Al Davis), all while being paid to be little bitch.
by Joesickness on Nov 23, 2009 7:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
The experiment is over, Jamarcus is a BUST!
The guy is not NFL material and rubbing the 5K earrings and fur coats in Als face is totallty disrespectful. He has’ni even thrown for 5000 yards yet.
Lets move on with Bruce Gradowski as our starter and give our fans a reason to believe.
GO RAIDERS!
"May the wind be at our back, here comes the Silver and Black "
by RUKidding on Nov 23, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here, Here!
Well said.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I Like our WR Group
They are amazing not so much of DHB but Louis Murphy and Chadz are great and they are super young too can’t wait till they get to there 4th or 5th year we will had a great WR Tandem I don’t know about DHB but, he needs to relax and just catch the ball.
Wake me up if we win
by nishal26 on Nov 23, 2009 12:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Gradkowski
my assessment of him:
He’s very accurate, especially on those short throws to Miller. And with guys like miller and possibly in the future if he has one here, the speedy receivers in DHB and Murphy can turn his short throws into big plays (we saw Miller do that late in the game)
But he knows what’s going on around him and sees the field very well. Evading pressure, looking the defense off, making his reads quickly, this is stuff that elite QB’s do. Grad is far from elite, but he does all those things fairly consistently.
Grad is far superior to Russell and that game was the best I’ve seen of a Raiders QB since Culpepper or Collins. I really think he should compete for the starting spot next year. He’s clearly an NFL QB.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 23, 2009 1:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Gradkowsi and accuracy
Bruce Gradkowski career completion pct. 52.9%
JaMarcus Russell career completion pct. 51.6%
Both of those rates are well bellow league average and as you can see Gradkowski isn’t much better despite the fact that he’s mostly played in a west coast offense that featured short passes.
I’m quite happy with the way Gradkowski played yesterday but to say He’s very accurate" is not backed up by the facts.
I think I’d like to see him play a few games before making any claims that he’s the answer at quarterback.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 3:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Over 70%
throughout his junior & senior year at Toledo. Btw, (if you’re referring to what I wrote) I did mention “once he settles” and we can’t expect him to settle-in all at once. Watch Thursday!
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 3:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can't be serious
who cares what the guy did at the University of Toledo.
Russell completed nearly 68% of his passes his last year at LSU and no one cares because what a guy did in college doesn’t matter in the NFL.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"very" would be excessive
but you added that adverb
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was talking about KA1Z3R's post
and his post said “He’s very accurate”.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol i was going to take that out but forgot
but for the receiving corps he’s working with, I was impressed with his throws compared to what Russell drags on the field week in and week out.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
by KA1Z3R on Nov 23, 2009 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree the receiver corps doesn't help his cause
and again I don’t want to sound like I’m down on Gradkowski because I’m not. I want him to do well but I guess I’m going to take a more wait and see approach before I get too excited about him.
I’m hoping he’s improved since he played for Tampa Bay and really at this point if he can just play decently he’ll be a huge upgrade over Russell.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN praised the Raiders
Well I suppose mostly they made fun of the Bungles, but they said on several occasions that Gradkowski gives this team “Hope”, meaning that the Raiders believe they have a chance to win with Bruce at the helm. That is very important to a team with culture issues but a lot of talent.
Bruce is the Man for this season, but we ought to look at drafting a QB like McCoy or LeFevour in April. Taylor Mays is a popular mock pick but it looks like Tyvon is manning the safety position just fine.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Nov 23, 2009 3:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Draft Needs
If Gradkowski continues to play solidly, we need to look at the both the offensive line and the defensive line first. I know people want to move Morrison to the outside and then draft a middle linebacker, but that realistically isn’t going to happen. It hasn’t happened yet, so I don’t think it will.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 23, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not?
We haven’t gone to playoffs lately either. Somethings need to change. My method is replacing the weak links. Forget superstars and get solid players in every positions so there’s nothing to exploit. Good coaches/teams attack weakness so we eliminate it.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Morrison
I just don’t see him moving positions whether or not it’s the right thing to do. People were calling for that to happen last year at this time as well, but I just don’t think it’s something that the team wants to do.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 23, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't consider Morrison to be a problem
especially compared to other needs on the team. This team needs help on both the lines and the receivers are maybe the worst in the league.
Let’s not forget that the quarterback situation is still very much in flux and really we won’t know for sure what the Raiders need to do in the draft until after the season is over.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 6:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, now there's no doubt that Morrison is a problem
Since you have no football instincts and are a machine person.
Quarterbacking is satisfactory, the main problem is the O line needing shoring and a week MLB/defensive captain and D-tackle. You are useful after all.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 29, 2009 12:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
QB is not satisfactory.
We just get that illusion because the bar is so low due to Russell being a bust. Gradkowski has better attributes than Russell and can make decisions and manage the game much better, but he’s still not a good QB. Acceptable, yes. I think some people on here get the impression we all thought he’d be the definite answer to the problem, while others just knew he was an improvement and a step in the right direction. The O-line is driving me crazy due to it’s bi-polarness. Some games we can give the QB all the time he needs, and then some games they just say fuck it. Our Defense can at time be spectacular, but the play calling is so erratic it makes a schizophrenic look sane.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 29, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You saw the heat Dallas brought
Much more than Cincinnati brought. Gradkowski was throwing in a phone booth pocket or had players hanging on him. I’m dazed and confused about Cable’s (and whoever elses) failure to do the same to Romo with blitzes (since we can’t mount a normal pass rush with linemen and LBs) . I was warming to Tom and then this huge lapse. Cable on the sidelines before kickoff looking like Dan Quail in the VP debate only chewing gum.
I know some people have called the Dallas game boring but I was enthralled through most of it. Very instructional because our weaknesses really presented themselves. I say leave the decent players, e.g. Gradkowski in place and replace the liabilities with tested veterans b/c the odds of getting someone into out lineup straight out of college is so high.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 29, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I still think
as of right now Gradkowski is not the definite answer. Can he get better in the off season w/ better weapons and protection? Sure. And I don’t really think our O-line is that far off.
But I may not be being fair. Some of those receivers were off by inches and had they picked up speed, could have gotten to the ball. And McFadden did drop a ball that was delivered right into his hands. So one more year with Gradkowski at helm and a better o-line could prove me wrong.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 29, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
To be a championship team you usually need some superstar players
especially at the skill positions. People always bring up the Patriots as an example of the team concept but Tom Brady is a superstar and he’s also the biggest reason they’ve won 3 Super Bowls.
Pittsburgh has Roethlisberger and the Colts and the Giants both have a Manning. Even going back to the Raiders last Super Bowl winning team they had Marcus Allen,Howie Long and Mike Haynes (all 3 are in the Hall of Fame).
Talent that is well coached is what wins in professional sports.
by sirbed on Nov 23, 2009 6:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I researched "no name" defenses and offenses and
am not able to refute you on this. We need at least one Super player on either side of the ball. Probably raises a team’s standard – other players push further.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 24, 2009 7:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this game just showed that jamarcus really is the main problem with this team
the way gradkowski played today made me realize that with jamarcus benched, we can start winning games. i agree with the fact that we should draft a middle linebacker like brian kushing and move morrison. look what its done for the texans defense. the main focus should be on our o-line now. with that, good progession of gradkowski, and a talented receiver, we can have a high powered offense.
by raiderfan4life on Nov 23, 2009 7:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good, you agreed with something
I believe is right. I apologize for insulting you a moment ago on another post.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 23, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol no problem
now only if Al could see this, then we would start winning
by raiderfan4life on Nov 23, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
MLB could be a draft option
Brandon Spikes anyone?
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Nov 24, 2009 12:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's "on the table"
Why not open this up with a new post?
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 24, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2009 NFL Draft
You can forget about taking a middle linebacker in the first round, or even in the draft at all for that matter until about the sixth round. Kirk Morrison isn’t going to move positions. We need to look at an offensive lineman (or two), a defensive lineman, a cornerback, an outside linebacker and possibly a quarterback.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 24, 2009 3:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd put those you listed in reverse order of importance
We need a QB of the future most of all. If Bruce has shown us anything, it’s that the Raiders can win with a competent QB.
I like our linebackers, but another OLB to pair with Howard would be a good idea. I am high on Sergio Kindle at a DE/OLB spot. Greg Ellis won’t live forever.
Corner is an option I guess, but I like CJ and Nnamdi and I’m not sure if we want to do that except to replace Stanford Routt, which was a good idea 2 years ago and is a great idea today.
There are lots of good DL available, starting with Ndamakong Suh and Gerald McCoy, not to mention Terence Cody. Any of these guys would be sensible.
Mario is fine at LT, but we could look at C or RT. Russell Okung or Bryan Bulaga are options.
I would prefer a first round QB (worked for the Falcons) but any of these options are viable.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Nov 24, 2009 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Order of Importance
I didn’t list those positions needed in any specific order and I don’t know what position I’d target first and then next and on and on. I probably won’t decide until after the season.
Also, yeah, I meant to put 2010 instead 2009 on that last comment subject line.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Nov 24, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know what I'd do
But who knows what Al will do.
I’d draft Jake Locker, Jimmy Clausen, Colt McCoy or Tim Tebow, in that order, whichever is available in round 1. Then I’d look DT round 2, perhaps Brian Price from UCLA.
I know this draft is stocked with QBs, and Ryan Mallett, Case Keenum and Dan LeFevour will probably be available later, but we need someone competent and we need them now.
I know one thing, the mock drafts will be interesting around here in the offseason. I hope we’re drafting a little higher than we did last time.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Nov 24, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Go watch the game again and watch Morrison's (#52) play
Then let’s find another Gus Otto, Ben Davidson, Gerald Irons, Phil Villapiano, Monte Johnson, Matt Millen, and so forth- They’re out there!
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 24, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How do we rate these College Quarterbacks?
Wow! I didn’t know all these quarterbacks were going to be sure NFL starters.
by Sbay on Nov 24, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure this day is punishment for yesterday
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 24, 2009 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cable's First Draft
He goes O-line within the first three rounds, then he is going to look defensive line, linebacker. I’m glad this is going to be documented so I can see the end result compared to my prediction. Hah!
by Sbay on Nov 24, 2009 5:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why would this be
his first draft?
He was the HC all this season….
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 24, 2009 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if he had significant input in that draft, since we didn't draft o-line.
I meant it as a question. I think Cable will have much more input with next year’s draft. I’m also getting the feeling that he is going to be around at least one more year.
by Sbay on Nov 24, 2009 10:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Cable's fate is now bound to Gradkowski's fate
Let the chips fall.
Son-of-Blanda
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 25, 2009 5:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe.
It does seem that Davis may be letting him do things his way with the Defense plays and what not.
I’m wondering if Davis is starting to realize that no one will come there any more.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 25, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gradkowski's Future
These next games will tell us whether Gradkowski is a keeper like one Tony Romo, or whether he’s another Gus Ferrotte.
Cowboys
Redskins
Pittsburg
We will know soon.
by Sbay on Nov 24, 2009 5:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Pit's in trouble
could be alot if Big Ben’s concussion is bad.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Nov 24, 2009 5:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














