Raybin's 2009 NFL Mock Draft, Part 1
Not too much need of an intro here.....the title says it all. This is a blend of both what I think teams will do and what I think they *should* do, so the eventual accuracy probably won't be the best. Still, I had a lot of fun doing it and I hope y'all enjoy it.
1. DETROIT LIONS--Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia
This is about as close to a guarantee as you can get. The Lions are pretty much pressing reset on the whole franchise, and the first step is a QB. Some people have Jason Smith going here, but the reality is that the franchise needs a face...it's really just how rebuilding is done.
2. ST. LOUIS RAMS--Jason Smith, OT, Baylor
With Orlando Pace gone, this is a no-brainer. Smith is the best OT prospect in the draft and Bulger or whoever will be their QB in the near future needs to be kept upright.
3. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS--Aaron Curry, LB, Wake Forest
The Chiefs have a lot of holes across the board, so a number of options would make sense here. That being said, their defense is terrible and to land maybe the most polished, NFL-ready player in the draft at #3 is a steal. They'll take him.
4. SEATTLE SEAHAKWS--Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech
I don't know if I've seen a single pick that has people arguing more than this one. I think it'll be Crabtree because of what happened to Seattle's receivers last year. They were practically signing any plumber or cab driver who maybe had once seen a football game. Jim Mora, Jr. won't want to risk repeating that fiasco in his first year, and Crabtree can be an amazing weapon for years to come.
5. CLEVELAND BROWNS--Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas
The Cleveland pass rush was pathetic, verging on non-existent last year. Enter Orakpo, a dynamic player who just happens to be the #1 rated DE in this draft.
6. CINCINNATI BENGALS--Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia
I've seen a number of possibilities placed here in various mock drafts, but I think Monroe makes the most sense. They simply will never succeed if Carson Palmer is flat on his back looking up at the sky all year. With Smith off the board, Monroe is the best option.
7. OAKLAND RAIDERS--B.J. Raji, NT, Boston College
I've seen two main choices here in a lot of mock drafts: Darius Heyward-Bey and Jeremy Maclin. I really hope Al resists the temptations for both. Bey is SERIOUS reach here at #7. I have him as an early/mid-second rounder. While not as much of a reach, Maclin too would be unwise. I don't have him as a top-10 myself and in any case there are more pressing needs.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm sick and tired of seeing the middle of our defensive line plugged by losers, has-beens and never-weres. William Joseph? Gerard Warren? Fred Wakefield? Come on. Raji is an absolute beast. A better D-Line would free up Morrison and Howard to work their magic. Raji is an instant upgrade. I've been over and over this in my mind and I don't think any other person on the board at this point could help the team as much as B.J. Raji. I just hope Al agrees.
8. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS--Mark Sanchez, QB, USC
Obviously, I can't mock trade scenarios. I can only go with the assumption that every team will keep their pick. We know that won't happen, obviously, and from what I'm seeing this is the most likely place for trade #1 to happen.
But I still have to select a pick that makes sense for the Jags and I think Sanchez is the way to go for them. He'll need a year on the bench to develop, so they can give David Garrard another chance to regain his form.
9. GREEN BAY PACKERS--Tyson Jackson, DE, LSU
Green Bay is switching to a 3-4 this year. Jackson is the #1 3-4 defensive end in the draft. You do the math.
10. SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS--Aaron Maybin, DE, Penn State
Maybin is young and his potential and upside are absolutely amazing. He's young, he's raw and he could be a superstar if given the right coaching. Mike Singletary, anyone?
11. BUFFALO BILLS--Robert Ayres, DE, Tennesee
The Bills pass rush was anemic last year. Ayres is the best pure 4-3 DE in the draft. He's a solid kid and can help the Bills right away.
12. DENVER BRONCOS--Everette Brown, DE, Florida State
With Jackson off the board, Brown is the best choice for a new 3-4 defense like Denver is switching to. He can also play some linebacker if called upon.
13. WASHINGTON REDSKINS--Michael Oher, OT, Mississippi
The Redskins need an upgrade at tackle and they need someone to block for Clinton Portis. With Andre Smith hurting his prospects with his work ethic and character issues, Oher makes the most sense. He's a beastly run blocker with a mean streak. He's just what the 'Skins need.
14. NEW ORLEANS SAINTS--Malcolm Jenkins, CB/S, Ohio State
The annual attempt by the Saints to upgrade their secondary. Jenkins' stock has dropped a bit, but his versatility (corner or safety) and undeniable talent make him the logical choice.
15. HOUSTON TEXANS--Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech
This one is rather speculative on my part. Johnson is such a freak of nature, that I think the Texans will maybe reach a bit to take him here and try to create one of the most fearsome pass-rushing combos in the league. Mario Williams and Johnson coming off the edges will make quarterbacks stay awake at night with terror.
16. SAN DIEGO CHARGERS--Andre Smith, OT, Alabama
Smith's talent is too great for him to fall any farther, especially when you consider that the Chargers need someone to block for LT in the worst way.
Well, the first half of the first round is done. Coming later today or tomorrow: 17-32! I've been sketching out a second round mock draft too, but I'm not sure about posting it yet. We shall see. In any case, enjoy!
1 recs |
44 comments
|
Comments
Good Stuff: Keep it coming!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 17, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Very Safe
Doesn’t seem to take any chances anywhere. Kinda looks like a Mel Kiper draft really.
I like Raji to Oakland. I’m all about Defense first. Gotta disagree on the first pick. No one seems sold on Stafford besides Kiper, who actually predicted Staff to be a #1 selection before he’d played a single game in college, or taken the practice field.
Andre Smith to the Chargers mixes things up. I mostly see ReyMa going in mocks. I’m hoping he makes it to pick 20.
by MattyZ on Apr 17, 2009 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Andre Smith
There are also many mocks now, after Cable’s press conference, that have the Raiders taking Andre Smith if Crabtree is not there at #7.
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
by TheRaiderWay on Apr 17, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meant to say earlier...
…you think if I got a ridiculous hairpiece, ESPN would hire me to do draft coverage? :-)
Oh and ReyMa does make it to #20, as you’ll see in part 2. But is he selected then? Read and find out! :-)
by Raybin on Apr 17, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't hurt
Don’t forget to buy at least 2 gallons of hair gel, and another 2 gallons for next week. Or you could just keep falling back to one argument over and over…Stafford’s a no brainer! hack
by MattyZ on Apr 17, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wasn't saying you're
a hack that was supposed to show up between a couple of *’s…kinda like I was throwing up. I’ve spent way too much time arguing Shiny on the Detroit board I won’t bore Oakland with it. Mostly cuz there’s no interest in him here. If there was I’d have a lot of shit to throw this way/
by MattyZ on Apr 17, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trying to remember where
Drawing a blank, but it was an outline on why Crabtree is over-rated. For the sake of my 2nd favorite team I hope you all avoid him. Andre is going to wind up a beast somewhere. He might have flaked out a little bit but he’s still a monster tackle and if Oakland lands him I think they’re going to be very happy.
by MattyZ on Apr 17, 2009 9:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't mind Smith...
…because I think with the right mentor, any “flaking out” issues can be corrected. Tom Cable strikes me as just that kind of man. I’ve seen some people have Smith practically falling out of the first round, which strikes me as nuts. He’s too talented, no matter what else is going on.
by Raybin on Apr 17, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no way...
Seattle doesnt take crabtree. They signed TJ. I would bet they go qb.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 17, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
TJ will be 32 this year
He’s not a long-term fix. Crabtree is.
by Raybin on Apr 17, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, but
they have other needs, such as getting a replacement for hasselback (sp). he has been hurt. they could go OL, the reason hasselback keeps getting hurt. Or they could also go rb. WR is not an immediate need.
Cleveland gets crabtree (boooooo!!!!!)
by gl12ox05 on Apr 17, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreement
TJ left cincy and went to seattle because he wants to be a #1 guy somewhere, crabtree will want to be a #1 guy somewhere, bad chemistry there. seattle also had a private workout with sanchez, they didn’t do that with crabtree. as much as I would like to see us crabtree, i do believe cleveland will take him since they are doing all they can to deal edwards. to those who think we need raji with the 7th overall pic, i disagree, the year we went to the SB we didn’t have a major defense we dominated with offense, a great reciever is really all we are lacking. and raybin no offense, but don’t think you should give up your day job to become an analyst..
by ThirteenFox on Apr 19, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why we lost the Super bowl
To the Bucs. They had a great Defense and an average offense. We had a great Offense and an average defense. Also the fact that Gruden knew almost all of our players which may have contributed to our loss. I Mean when we get picked off 5 times, and rushed for 19 yards which makes us super one dimensional l. That’s why I believe that Defenses win Championships. But, one thing I noticed that was kinda ironic was that we lost to the Bucs in the super bowl and went on a 6 year losing streak then, on December 28, 2009 we beat the Bucs led by former super bowl winning coach Jon Gruden kick them out of the playoffs and throw Gruden in the trash. I don’t know kinda ironic to you?
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 19, 2009 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Detroit is taking stafford
St. Louis is taking Jason Smith
Kansas City is taking Aaron Curry
Seattle is a toss up between mark sanchez and eugene monroe
Browns are taking michael crabtree
the bengals are taking andre smith or eugene monroe if he is still there
The raiders are taking Brian Orakpo or jeremy maclin. we aint picking bj raji and thank god because he is an awful value pick and does not address a need as much as everyone thinks.
by posey440 on Apr 17, 2009 11:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Andre Smith
If the top of the draft goes as you say above, I believe the Raiders will select Andre Smith over Orakpo or Maclin.
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
by TheRaiderWay on Apr 17, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oher
As much as I want Orakpo as the pick I don’t think he is even being considered by the Raiders. I think they will go either O-line or WR but given A. Smiths work ethic it will be Oher. I don’t think Cable wants to get on people anymore over work ethic and effort; it seems he has his hands full with JR. If it comes to WR it would be Maclin or DHB; I hope it’s not Maclin.
Just HIT somebody.
by SBcitizen on Apr 17, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree
before all the incedents happened with the draft and him being out of shape and him not playing in his bowl game, andre smith was reguarded as the top offensive lineman. so he would be a steal if he was to fall to number seven.
by gametime_gsw on Apr 17, 2009 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not taking smith
smith is a great run blocker due to his size, but his laziness makes him less of a candidate for an nfl left tackle against speed rushers. with all the free agent tackle signings we did, i don’t see us spending MORE money especially top 10 rookie money, on ANOTHER tackle, especially after the robert gallery fiasco.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 19, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Both me and Al Davis are satisfied with our Offensive line. So, I hope that we go Defense with our first because you can’t win a game while giving up 200+ yards on the ground, So, that has to change If we want to reach our full potential.
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 19, 2009 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's there, Crabtree would be tempting...
…for the Browns, but, man, their pass rush is just SO BAD.
by Raybin on Apr 17, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
mock deraft #2
1.lions-curry
2.rams-j.smith
3.kc- monroe
4.seahawks-stafford
5.browns-crabtree
6.bengals-raji
7. raiders-heyward-bey- fits perfect!
8.jaqs-sanchez
9.green bay-jackson
10-49ers-oher
11-bills- smith
12.broncos-brown
13.skins-jenkins
14 .saints-maybin
15-texans -johnson
16 superchokers-rb or db
this is my opinion and this will change day to day on needs. bills will trade ot peters to the eagles , so the bills will draft a o tackle. i also think the browns /lions/bengals/raiders will be talking to the broncos alot. the broncos want sanchez
by sports with steve on Apr 17, 2009 12:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice!
I have been thinking same as you that the Seahawk might go QB especally if Stafford is there.
Yes I belive the Raiders are going to draft DHB. I dont know if its at #7 or we trade down a few spots but I think this young kid will grow into a force.
I also see the Patriots moving up into the top 10
"May the wind be at our back, here comes the Silver and Black "
by RUKidding on Apr 18, 2009 2:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
trade down
no one thinks dhb is a top 10 pick, maclin yes but not dhb, now i think if we trade down then yes we take dhb especially if the seahawks don’t take sanchez, then denver will want to move up and take him, so we take a couple of denver’s picks and improve other positions we need as well in the 2nd and 3rd rd.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 19, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
DHB at 7
makes no sense
Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!
by naq92 on Apr 19, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Maybe Heyward isn’t what we need but, WR is huge for us. There is really a lot of doubters on Heyward but, to be honest my day won’t be ruined if we take him. He is fast that can’t be a negative and I mentioned that he had a lot of doubters which may play into his confidence for the positive cuz he could be thinking"Ok, they thought that I was going to be a bust so I’ma prove them wrong" I am a little worried we might pass up something huge even though it may too seem so to others.
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 19, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea i think andre smith will be the pick if crabtrees not there..and you guys are both wrong it wont even be considered to take oher or heyward bay at 7
by pablopaul25 on Apr 17, 2009 3:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i thought monroe going 6th was a lil out of the ordinary...
but ya, i guess that would make sense if seattle goes WR
Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!
by naq92 on Apr 17, 2009 5:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you really think...
The Raiders will pick Raji when they have like 5 or 6 or maybe even 7 DT’s on their roster? I think I would rather have them trade down or even pick up Maclin or DHB than getting Raji
by L.A. Raiders on Apr 17, 2009 7:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We do have five or six people on the roster for DT
But, why did we finish 31st on run defense I’ll give you the answer none of them can penetrate the line of get to the QB fast enough. I would be perfectly fine if we drafted Raji he is a true solid clogger of the lines. I can guarantee we won’t fuck up like the chiefs did with Glen Dorsey.
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 17, 2009 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no Rec
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 18, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no
because numerous people already stated this.
Police Fucking Hate Me, Trying To Relocate Me To LA, But Like The Raiders, I' ma Bring It Back To The Bay! - Nump
by Rayder K on Apr 18, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, what is the point of +1
I’m not trying to cry over not getting a Rec but if you are going to +1 someone might as well rec ’ em it’s not gonna hurt anyone and If I recall right you were saying this also on some other post.
"We want to Win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it,even my organization deserves it. You have to Win and Win with a vision of the Super Bowl. That's our passion here"- Mr. Davis
by nishal26 on Apr 19, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
contradiction
you understand you said we had bad run defense because our dt’s couldn’t penetrate and get to the qb..and then you talk about raji being a clogger. cloggers don’t get to qb’s either, they clog holes so the rb’s can’t get through. so which do you want him to be a dt who gets to the qb, which is usually a quicker dt, or a clogger who is usually not as quick but just BIG.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 19, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is...
…all half-dozen of them are either non-factors (Fred Wakefield, Greyson Gunheim) or chronic underachievers (William Joseph, Terdell Sands). I was a little unfair to Gerard Warren because he’s played well with us, though obviously never living up to his crazy high draft number. Still, Raji is an instant upgrade over all of them.
If nothing else, he’s a big improvement over Tommy Kelly at the three technique.
A combo of Raji at three technique and either Kelly or Warren beside him with maybe Joseph as reserve and Richardson, Burgess and Trevor Scott on the ends could be a bigtime force.
by Raybin on Apr 18, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
5 DT's & 5 DE's on the roster
And can’t stop the run with what we have.
With that logic why draft a WR. According to the roster on Raiders.com we have 8 WR (Carter and Lelie I don’t think are signed but they’re on the roster)
by S-n-B4life on Apr 18, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
roster size
yes those two are on the roster on the website because i don’t believe they’ve updated any unsigned free agents. and considering the most DT’s you’ll have on the field at one time is 2, then you really don’t need more than 4 (1 back up per side) but you can at times have 5 WR’s on the field at one time, so 8 isn’t really that big of a stretch. I mean that’s just the way football is played. and adding another dt isn’t gonna instantly change the run d because what everyone is forgetting is we are changing defense over all as we have NEW d coord. new scheme, new system. different players play differently based on systems.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 19, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
8 IS that big of a stretch
dude, it’s the offseason. most teams come in with huge rosters in some positions. during training camp, the underachievers get cut to bring the number back to normal…
Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!
by naq92 on Apr 19, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense won't change much
If you listen to Cable’s press conference he said that the D scheme will look very similar to what we have been running.
Just HIT somebody.
by SBcitizen on Apr 20, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he says that
but you can’t change coordinators and NOT have a change in d, it’s not like cable is a defense guy who would be running the d himself. i would be willing to garuntee that other d coords don’t do things the same way as EITHER of buddy’s kids.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 20, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
theres no way were gunna get raji…and im glad..i think hes overrated..your not paying a guy to make plays penetrating the line..you paid kelly for that..you just need a dude to “be a load”..and you can get that later in the draft
by pablopaul25 on Apr 18, 2009 8:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If nothing else, Kelly showed...
…last season that he can’t consistently penetrate the line.
by Raybin on Apr 18, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no he showed he can..but he needs a guy like raji had in college brace to plug gaps and take double teams away from him
by pablopaul25 on Apr 18, 2009 9:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















