Oakland Raider Draft News: 2009 NFL Draft Grades: Oakland Raiders
I am beginning to laugh at these "so called" experts that rank our draft as an F.
IN fact, our own, Mocking the Draft has the Raiders at a .33 out of 4.0 on their Draft Grades:
They took the combination of Three Polls and gave each team a GPA.
USA Today ranked the Raiders as the ONLY "F" in the Draft:
• Oakland Raiders: WR Darrius Heyward-Bey seventh? He disappeared for games at a time, is not a well-rounded receiver but boasts the key Raider attribute — straight-line speed. Just a huge reach and not enough value here. Same for S Michael Mitchell, taken in the second round but mostly considered a much later pick, though the Chicago Bears said they liked him two picks after Oakland's. WR Louis Murphy blossomed as a senior, OK pick in fourth. LB Slade Norris nothing special.
Anyone who watches tape of Mitchell, unlike Mayock before he opened his trap, has got to see what the Cowboys, Bears and Raiders saw. The kid is a BEAST. He has incredible timing and can force fumbles, incompletions and trips to the Hospital. He is exactly what this team needs in the secondary. IN fact, what team doesn't need a fast thumper with great instincts patroling the defensive backfield?
Louis Murphy, even from the haters was seen as a great value pick, yet he is called OK.
|
Then There is The ESPN Fan Nation Who Gave The Raiders an "F":
How can the Nation hate so much, when the HATERS even gave us a D?
Fan House Also Gave The Raiders an "F":
It seems that they think that drafting "Raider Types" is a bad thing. How is speed, heart and a great motor a bad thing in a weak draft?
How is drafting DHB worthy of an F? He is a great system fit and is currently J-Russ's most dynamic weapon?
How is drafting players who can get to the QB from the LB position and a safety that reminds me of Jack Tatum a bad thing?
How is taking a 2nd Round talent at WR in the 4th a bad thing?
How is getting a blocking TE, for once, that will allow Zack Miller to run more routes a bad thing?
These are the players that we drafted and the holes they will fill, yet DHB should have been passed over for a Kid with an ego the size of Jupiter and a foot that is still mending and the Raiders should have selected Terdell Sands II (Ron Brace) instead of addressing their need for a hard hitting safety?
Give me a BREAK!?!?
Ask anyone who was at the Warehouse on Saturday, I was in a daze for hours after DHB was the pick. Then, once I either put on my rose colored glasses and drank the Kool-Aid or watched tape of our two picks and looked at their selections in perspective I started to become a believer in our Top II picks.
I would grade our draft as a B, because we didn't get a FB or DT, but we did address the rest of our needs and you know that J-Russ now has ample weapons and our defense will be better next year. That is a success, not a failure, as an "F" would indicate.
Go ahead and say that I'm drinking the Kool-AId, heck, maybe I am, but I think that this draft class will definitely prove the haters wrong and with a couple of key Veteran Pick-ups I expect this draft to help immensely in our pursuit of the AFC West Crown.
0 recs |
93 comments
|
Comments
Thought this was interesting
Most Likely To Make The Raiders Look Good: When the Raiders took Mitchell in the middle of Round 2, the TV guys didn’t even have a highlight ready to go. It might be because Kiper had him rated as a sixth-rounder, at best, but more likely an undrafted free agent. “I’ll say this: Oakland took Michael Mitchell, OK?” Kiper said. “I asked teams after the draft. The misnomer is it’s all Mel Kiper’s opinion, it’s all Todd McShay. You have to ask other teams. We’re not the end-all, be-all. Some said they had him as a free agent. One team told me they had Michael Mitchell in the third round. They had him as a Pro Bowler. They think it’s a great pick by the Oakland Raiders. So Oakland wasn’t the only team out on the island that saw something in that kid.”
Seems like a little back tracking after calling him such a huge reach on the air
by nateroddick20 on Apr 28, 2009 2:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I also heard Kuiper and McShay backtracking big time
on the espn First draft – draft review podcast basically said the same thing that they have since found out that a lot of teams consider Mitchell a potential pro-bowler and Kuiper even said he loves the Raiders and Loves Al Davis (hahahahahaha).
Every year some one gets picked a lot higher than the ‘experts’ though the difference this year is the venom in which the media went after the raiders which is very disappointing and since then everyone just jumps on the bandwagon and now they have done the research they should have done in the first place they are eating their words
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on Apr 28, 2009 3:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the rumor was chicago
wanted Mitchell yet it was later found out that they had him targeted in the fifth-sixth. He was definately an unknown as no one had a background on him to comment or footage to show (NFLNet, ESPN). Most analysts had only heard of him in the last few weeks going into the draft and didn’t figure much
looking forward to the next 30 years of this team
by 30yearR8RFan on Apr 30, 2009 4:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
um Saint, our draft was terrible...
mostly because of our first pick. Remember these are the grades based on what value we could have gotten when it was our pick. The grades would change 5 years from now based on NFL performance.
So based on value, our #7 pick was terrible. It sounds like we wanted DHB no matter what. It sounds like we tried several avenues to trade down but none worked out. So since we are so stubborn, we picked a guy we could have gotten later on. Now we have to pay him #7 type money and he scored only 5 tds last year.
I wont even touch about how unproductive he was in college.
I am not sure about mitchell. When I heard that we reached again, I literally put holes in the wall. After seeing his highlights, I have lightened up a little. I like the on the field attitude this guy brings. “you come into my house, you get hit hard!” That sounds like old raider football. I just hope this guy is as good in the NFL as his film and wont get hurt or too many flags.
Murphy in the fourth round was fine, but seriously, how much impact is this guy going to be. His college stats in a spread offense is nothing to jump around about. He might just be the best technical receiver we have.
the rest of the picks, Ill be honest, i dont know much about. We did fill needs but I dont know how many will make our team. It seems quite a few players from this draft were reaches.
This draft seemed to be an Al Davis ego draft. He picked the players he wanted and didnt care how we got them. Just get them, Baby! Get ready for early draft picks for the next few years.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 28, 2009 3:33 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Clearly you have not heard all the apologies and backtracking going on since the draft
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on Apr 28, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dont really care about apologies...
Our #7 pick was not a good one. No apology needed.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 28, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suggest
you watch the game highlights and his workout in the camp, you will change your mind. This idea he has bad hands is bogus, he is taller, faster and better than Crabtree, case closed. But rather than keeping a closed mind, why don’t you wait until the season starts, and after 16 games there will be a history of effort to make up your mind. It is of course silly to sit around and argue about something that will be proven one way or the other in the next 9 months. Plenty of time to gloat or apologize then.
by Laoren on Apr 28, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The idea that he is better than crabtree is bogus...case closed...
Its not about crabtree (even though he IS who I wanted). DHB is only a piece of why I am upset. the draft is about getting the right value at your spot. If you dont think there is value at 7, you move down. If you do, you pick the bpa. Bottom line is that we are wasting #7 money on a guy we could have gotten later on. You dont see NE or Pitt making lame picks like this. If they are set on a guy, they determine where the best spot is to draft him, then they trade to that spot (most of the time down). If they dont see value at their spot, then again they move down and gain an extra draft pick.
I did see highlights on DHB. It was nothing special. I liked crabtree because of the number of times he got hit, still made the catch and still scored. I also liked crabtree because of his nose for the endzone. The only thing DHB has on Crabtree is his physical abilities.
DHB, in time may turn into a good player, we dont know. but again, lets say he does, we could be paying him at a cheaper price, then give him a raise. We could have used that extra money elsewhere…
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Point on value:
I heard that Jacksonville was also high on DHB and The Raiders were not the only team to have him as the #1 receiver.
He has will working out with Roy Green in AZ and I say that now is the time to bring in a Jerry Rice or Tim Brown and offer him a coaching job to work with our young core or receivers.
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 29, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
#7 pick
and all of these are opinions… You draft best possible and fill needs if trading down is not an option. Raiders had needs at DT, DE, OL, WR, and S when Al went on the clock. Any could argue what was most pressing. Raji went 9th, Crabtree 10th, Orakpo 15th with a couple of O-linemen sprinkled in down through 20. Safety did not have anyone graded that high.
what drops the Raiders grade in my eyes is the stretch to pull a low first/second rounder up to #7 with the other talent still on the board, going after another WR with questionable hands later, and pretty much ignoring any needs on the offensive line or defensive line until most all the core talent was gone
looking forward to the next 30 years of this team
by 30yearR8RFan on Apr 30, 2009 4:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you!!!
Spending 21 mill guarant on raji, crabtree, or orakpo would have been okay because those guys were expected and rated to go anywhere from 4 – 12. The only value would have been getting crabtree at 10, and rak at 15. if those guys are busts, you are paying them less than the money people thought they would be earning.
Instead the raiders did the opposite. Instead they are going to pay a guy 21 mil guar who was expected to sign for 10 mil guar (lower 1st rnd??). Even if he lives up to potential, thats 10 million we could have used elsewhere.
by gl12ox05 on May 1, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a RIDUCULOUS argument
saint, (as usual)
Too bad no one is listening to guys like gl12ox05 and 30YearR8RFan (and R3ZZ on the other thread (now this is getting ridiculous)
Saint, if Jax is interested in DHB then you LET THEM OVERPAY for the guy. You may have to consider that possibility that you got played especially when THEY took a guy you could have used….thats right, Eugene Monroe
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 4, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SERIOUSLY GUYS
Stop replying to this fucken douchebag!!!
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on May 6, 2009 5:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Logic, Hurts Don't it?
LOL!
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 6, 2009 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not only was our seventh pick not so good, neither were our picks after that.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 28, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A SUPERSTAR or Mr.Negative
Is there anything you like about the RAIDERS, maybe then I can fill a little more at ease. Thanks
WIN lose OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
“on paper” it was a bad pick, it was a terible pick. make no doubt about it, every raider fan wanted Michael Crabtree. Why?… idk, maybe brain waashed by the “experts”. maybe just the big name.
when they announced the 7th pick, i was hoping they wouldnt say Maclin but instead they said Darrius Heyward-Bey, the first thing i though was… WTF.
everybody says “they should have traded down”, and “they should have drafted monroe then packaged their second round to trade up into the first round, and get DHB”.
the bottom line is, that they like this kid, they like his deep threat ability with Russel and they didnt care that they were drafting him with the seventh overall pick.
I'm gametime_gsw, and i aprove this message.
by gametime_gsw on Apr 28, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats the problem...
Al Davis wanted this guy no matter what. We could have gotten him later and either gotten an extra draft pick, or saved money when signing him and used that extra money elsewhere.
Sounds like another scenario where Al Davis gets so glued to a player, he doesnt care about the repercussion. ie what we gave up for a hall, dhb, moss, janikowski, walker, etc….
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a problem with this comment
i’m not sure how much football you really watch based on your examples. Hall while a bust in oakland was a ball hawk in atlanta, and went on to ball hawk again in washington, he’s a GREAT zone coverage corner, just not good at man to man, who knew. moss, was great in minnesota and turned out to be pretty damn productive in NE, so tell me where al was wrong with moss?, walker, was THE guy in greenbay with a good qb to throw to him. janikowsi yeah when we took him with a first round pick i was thinking, wtf? but he is after all the all time leading scorer in raiders history, so where was the mistake there?…now with dhb that is a story still to be told, but so far i’m lost on where you think the fascination with these players were wrong when he had it.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
how much football do you really watch???
Hall – “a GREAT zone coverage corner just not good at man to man”. Well as you know, we do play man. so why do we give away so many draft picks and give him a crazy bonus???
Moss – Great in Minn and in NE. Minn and NE had good qbs that were throwing him the ball (also good OL to protect those qbs). We had neither. we had k collins and a walters throwing ducks to moss, or getting hit by dl. again why waste those picks if we cant get him the ball.
Walker may have been good in GB, then two knee surgeries later, he was on the bubble of getting cut (and probably would have had he not taken a pay cut.) But instead, since we still didnt have that qb who can consistantly get walker the ball, we decided to sign him to a ridiculous contract.
Oh yeah supposed football expert…. janikowski was a horrible 1st round pick. so you say “he is after all the all time leading scorer in raiders history.” Big Deal. for a #1, he should be the all time leading scorer in NFL history. We could have gotten him in at least the 3rd round.
Come back to football class anytime Thirteen fox.
by gl12ox05 on May 4, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
#7 pick was perfect
how many times have you heard that the best wr are taken in the second round we took him early before anyone else got him and if we had taken craptree , first rounders have been known to be busts did you see the chronicle live the reporters said he was more like a crapshoot remember (jj stokes )and many others before him except fitzgerald have come to be good but have not proven durability , cable said he`s looking for leadership and hard workers , that`s why louis murphey and mike mitchell are here as well we are a run first team our RB`S ,J FARGAS ,D MCFADDEN , M BUSH are ready our QB`S J RUSSEL , J GARCIA , are working harder , our TE ZACH MILLER is ready , and now our receivers J L HIGGINS ,C SCHILLENS , D HEYWARD-BEY , L MURPHEY , looks like we have given J-RUSSEL more help whether it`s short passes over there heads or MCFADDEN running it out of the back field on a screen thanks to a lot better o-line E PEARS , K BARNES , R GALLERY , C GREEN , M HENDERSON , S SAETALE , and d looks better N ASUMUAGHA , C JOHNSON , safeties M MITCHELL , H EUGENE , M HUFF , T BRANCH , linebackers K MORRISON , T HOWARD , J ALSTON , R BROWN , d line is what we need to address with some vet free agents can you complain with this we are finally coming together
by RAIDERS1976 on Apr 29, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My feeling has always been that it is better to take the player you feel is the BPA (DHB in this case, whether you agree or disagree) if there isn’t a clear way to trade down and still be able to pick him. We’ll never know how long he would have lasted in the draft, or if there were any teams looking to move up to 7.
That being said, I’m not sure that he is going to be the best receiver they could have taken at that pick. I’m not a pro scout, and the “experts” have never really impressed me with their draft boards.
by chri5 on Apr 28, 2009 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats the point...
take the best available person. DHB was not the best available at #7. If he is someone we had to have, then pick someone of value at #7. Then trade back into the late first round (probably before ny giants) to pick him. Thats if we couldnt trade back into the later first round. I dont think any player is someone we HAVE to have.
We need to follow the model of NE. If they have to have a player, they trade back to where they think that player should be picked, thus gaining an extra draft pick later on. Then, with the extra draft pick, they can move up if they deem the next player they want will go before their pick. Either way, NE is always making a value pick. Not this crap, having to have this player and pick them way before anyone else even thinks about it.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Value doesn't win games.
I’m sick of hearing that the Raiders got bad “value” for the fastest WR in the combine.
First of all, I am as sure as it gets that the Raiders had a phone line open for anyone willing to trade up to their spot so they could drop down to get better “value” for Hayward-Bey. That phone obviously either didn’t ring, or they didn’t get a good enough offer to accept.
The next thing that happened is what everyone can’t stop talking about- THEY PICKED THE GUY THAT THEY WANTED THE MOST, WHO THEY THOUGHT WAS THE BEST POSSIBLE PERSON FOR THEM TO TAKE AT THAT SPOT. Case closed.
Who gives a rats ass what some “professional analyst” has to say about it? They aren’t in the draft room making the pick. They’re just sitting there on their high horse talking about how they would do it different if their opinion mattered enough for a professional football team to pay them to do a Real job.
Great value results from getting real results from an investment. At this point in time, neither Crabtree or Hayward- Bey have anything to show for their “value”. Let them play. If passes start bouncing off Hayward- Bey’s facemask, sure, call him a bust. But until then, shut the fuck up about the “value” of rookie players.
by Tyshizzle on Apr 29, 2009 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
its really hard to believe....
that the trade opportunity wasnt there. Especially when cleveland did it all draft long and NE does it all the time.
Anyway, DHB’s skill results is only half the argument. The other part of way this was a lame pick is the investment part. DHB was not even the 4th ranked WR. yet we drafted him 7th overall. This means we will be paying him #7 type money. Part of the argument is that we could have gotten this guy later in the first round. In doing so, we would be paying him less money and probably gotten another draft pick.
lets say DHB does become a stud (only time will tell). Since we will already be paying him #7 type money (20 million guar??), think about how much more he will comand when its time to renegotiate? As apposed getting him later on in the first round (say $10 mill guar). Then when its time to renegotiate, he gets a bigger contract. But between the two scenario’s, we could have saved ourselves about $10mil that could have been used on a FA.
The same thing if he’s a bust. We lose 20 mill guar vs 10 mill guar.
Thats not value???
by gl12ox05 on May 1, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
only 5 tds
I’m curious how many TD’s do you think he should have gotten in one year in a pro style offense that did not have a great qb? a 5 TD year for an nfl reciever is a decent year, a 10 td year is a GREAT year, so tell me how 5 tds in a pro style college offense is a bad thing? Everyone was in love with crabtree to include me because of his #‘s but really if you think of the fact he was in a spread offense as the only real option it’s biased. DHB isn’t as bad of a pick as most people think, if ANYTHING he’ll help the run game by pulling the safeties out of the box so he can be covered deep.
Mitchell is a hitter, plain and simple and with speed to boot. john lynch was a slow safety but he HIT, roy williams is decent speed but he HITS, well this kid has speed AND HITS..don’t see a problem there.
murphy ehh, a #2 guy in a spread offense we’ll see maybe a decent slot guy.
the rest of the picks, people complain about al’s love of speed, but in case people forgot, tony dungy that guy who created awesome defenses in tampa and indy, loved speed as well, his d’s were so good because they flew around the field and move to the ball. that’s what these guys do.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so basically
your point is:
Because the so-called experts are SO UNANIMOUS in their opinion of your draft, they MUST all be stoopid.
great logic, thanks.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Apr 28, 2009 3:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Look, a Crabass disciple from TT again...
Just win, baby!
by trentemoeller on Apr 28, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Mr Red Herring
Crabtree is NOT the point. He never has been. But listen to your own people and admit. Like gl120x05 that your #7 pick was a brain fart.
if you dont wanna take Crabtree for whatever reason then DONT! But dont delude yourselves by thinking DHB was a great pick. You could have taken an Offensive Lineman or a Defensive Tackle. Bottom line YOU DIDNT GET VALUE for your pick.
Whether you WANTED DHB is ALSO not the point. He was a reach and you know it.
If you insist on drinkin the kool aid then go ahead, just leave the regular denizens of this blog and the visitors (like myself and techtom) alone.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Apr 28, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uhhh...
If we wanted him that is the point. If we couldn’t trade down and not get him in the second then picking him was a good pick.
It may be a bad pick strategy-wise, but only in reference to the draft. The strategy of the draft is to continually take the BPA and game the other teams by predicting their picks and and getting the next BPA later.
The Raiders just looked at who they wanted and who was the best fit. They took those players and people are pissed cause it disregards conventional draft strategy.
Janikowski was considered a reach, but he is of the best Kickers in the league right now.
Just HIT somebody.
by SBcitizen on Apr 28, 2009 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
cant you read?
thats what im saying. Im saying it was a bad pick strategy wise! Thats what MOST people here are saying!!! You just single out guys that arent normally from this blog.
all of you guys are acting like im mindlessly defending Crabtree. Im not. Im a big fan of his. But he’s not the point!!! at the #7 pick you DIDNT get the BPA (best player available) at THAT selection number. You could have had Brian Orakpo, BJ Raji, Eugene Monroe, Aaron Maybin and yes, the argument could be made for Michael Crabtree.
Its you guys who are mindlessly defending DHB with “mel kiper is an idiot”, “what do the talking heads know?” and “al davis know more about the teams needs” blah blah blah….geez guys, get over it
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Apr 29, 2009 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BPA
It’s only bad ‘strategy’ wise if going after BPA is your strategy. Obviously Cable and Al are stepping away from that. (I think that was SBcitizens point) Mindlessly picking the BPA based on college stats and ‘experts’ is in itself a bad strategy as far as I’m concerned. We drafted ‘classic Raiders’ who will work hard to improve the TEAM and can win in the NFL, not guys who played well in college.
by dram5780 on Apr 29, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
really? Classic Raiders?
How is THAT strategy workin for ya?
all the Raider faithful do is scream ’haters" at everyone and mindlessly talk up DHB and already assigniing nicknames to your OTHER reach of a pick Mike Mitchel. And what has that gotten you?
I’ll tell ya…you can count your wins on ONE hand for each of the last seven years
2003 — 4 wins
2004 — 5 wins
2005 — 4 wins
2006 — 2 wins
2007 — 4 wins
2008 — 5 wins
best of luck to ya!!!
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on Apr 29, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
strategy
considering this is the first year in a while that we have used that strategy we’ll tell you at the end of the season. btw how many national championships does tech have?
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excactly right.
TP doesn’t get it. The strategy has obviouly switched this year to a back to basics approach. (ie Cable ‘Pound the ball and throw it over their heads’)
I think we’ve made some good moves in that direction. Let see if it works.
Occam’s Razor: ‘The Simplest Solution Is Usually The Best’
by dram5780 on May 1, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So nice to see that you need 13fox to fight ur battles for you
especially after you got pwned…
back to basics approach. (ie Cable ‘Pound the ball and throw it over their heads’)
pound the rock? hmmm….how you gonna do that when Al Davis didnt draft Eugene Monroe to block for that stud RB of yours (McFadden). What a freaking waste
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 1, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mario Henderson Is a Fantastic run Blocking LT:
In fact he is probably better than Monroe, especially since he is now entering his third year. OT’s usually need some seasoning, unless they are named Joe Thomas or Ryan Clady.
Just so you know, our Offensive Line, unlike the Nutters O-Line, is much improved this year.
Henderson
Gallery
Satele
Carlisle
Barnes
With McQuistan, Pears, Morris and Wilson backing them up is more than just solid. It is, dare I say, becoming an above average group, and our backs are an elite class, McFadden, Fargas and Bush may be the best tandem in the NFL. MAY BE…
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on May 1, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its amazing
But do you guys know ANY OTHER ARGUMENT besides
“so-and-so will be better than so-and-so” before one or both of those guys have even had a chance to play a single down?
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 4, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
as for you
way to win an argument….bring up something irrelevant.
please explain to me what the # of national championships Texas Tech has won has to do with the fact that Al Davis’ draft philosophies are RUINING your team.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 1, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude havent you got better things to do than go on a team you
don’t support’s board and talk absolute shit.
You are clearly more biased towards Crabass than we are towards DHB and you are yet to make 1 well thought out point you just typing generic anti-Al Davis, Anti-raiders crap trying to start a bullshit argument.
Surely you have better things to do with your time Testicle pirate
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on May 2, 2009 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Testicle Pirate??? Hilarious!!! You know, profanity is the crutch of an illiterate m f’er.
Look i will say for the millionth time. I just stumbled on here when i saw people talkin smack about crabtree at which point I stood up for my guy. And all of that is fine. People are entitled to their opinion.
Its when you guys bend over backwards tryin to reverse engineer an explanation WHY DHB is better than Crabtree that I felt I had to say something and I did.
My point is that its getting quite and obvious u guys are just trying to make yourselves feel better by definitively stating YOUR guy will be better by bashing the guy you didnt draft (i.e. Eugene Monroe or Crabtree….see saints post above). It is just sad
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 4, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, your argument makes no sense.
The Raiders got an OT and filled their OLine needs through free agency. Why the heck would they draft Eugene Monroe when that need has already been filled?
Why the heck would the Raiders draft Crabtree, just because he is “rated higher” than DHB? He doesn’t fit in the Raiders system, he didn’t want to be a Raider, and he doesn’t provide the need that the Raiders want.
The mistake that you’re making isn’t in saying the Raiders need to pick the best player available, it’s assuming that the best player available isn’t the one the Raiders picked. All you’re going off of is what the so-called “experts” have said, that Monroe would have been a better pick, or Crabtree would be a better reciever. But before you jump on that bandwagon, do a little research.
As for saying that we shouldn’t say “so-and-so” is better than “so-and-so”, you’re doing the same thing, as well as all the so-called experts, who are saying Crabtree or Maclin will be better than DHB, or so-and-so safety will be better than Mitchell.
Bottom line is, the Raiders drafted who they thought fit their system the best. Maybe that means drafting DHB a bit high, but again, by whose standard? Yours? Mel Kiper’s, who didn’t even have footage of Mike Mitchell, despite being on several team’s draft boards?
by hulkweazel on May 5, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another Red Herring
Ive NEVER SAID any player will be better than any other player. Never did. Please tell me where I have and I will gladly retract it. You wont because you cant. period.
And YOUR bash the talking heads by calling them so-called experts is bogus too. You can’t discount Kiper, McShay and mayock then selectively point to Mayock by saying Mayock knew who the Raiders were going pick.
I will say again. Value Value Value. You didnt get it. The best example is the Eli Manning/Philip Rivers year. If you want Rivers but are faced with Eli Manning on the board then you take Eli Manning and you work out a deal, for pete’s sake!!!!
Now yes, you might say Manning didnt want to play in San Diego. that would be true. But the example also applies in the sense that only QBs have this kind of pull to force a deal. After all its called a DRAFT for a reason. You go where you get called and WRs dont have the pull to force a deal. You cannot say maclin or crabtree wouldnt have fit your system.
and as for the so-called experts…youre right. They dont know everything. This draft is a high risk business. So then your strategy is, since they dont know everything we’re gonna do whatever the hell we want. Brilliant! Look at what happened with Dallas the year Randy Moss came out. Dallas wanted Moss, did their homework, listened to the experts, and in the end didnt take the chance on a potentially troublemaking kid. The Vikes did. As badly as it worked out for Dallas. That was the process you follow. You try and take as much risk out of the draft as possible. By NOT LISTENING to the ‘experts’ your introducing MORE risk than necessary.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 5, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem with the “experts” is not that they were wrong, but that they failed to do the research they should have done. For some reason, they never saw that Mike Mitchell shot up in team’s draft boards. They never saw that several teams were looking to take DHB higher than they thought. They never saw a couple questionmarks on Crabtree that made teams hesitant to take him. THAT’s the problem I have with the experts – it’s not that they were wrong.
Let’s assume the Raiders take Crabtree. He gave the impression that he didn’t want to be in Oakland. What could very well happen is he holds out, doesn’t sign for a while, misses training camp and is weeks behind in training and learning his routes. He starts the season far behind everyone else, trying to catch up and perform how he should have. Sounds far fetched? It happened with Jamarcus.
As for comparing Moss with DHB, you got your comparisons wrong. Moss is closer to Crabtree. There are numerous question marks on him, and the least of which are that some think he is a “diva” and that he didn’t interview well. And it’s not even because he’s a bit slower – it’s that he played in a spread system that makes it much easier to get open and catch passes.
Now, I’m not saying DHB will for sure be better than Crabtree. Al Davis is banking on the fact that his lack of production is purely from playing in a run-first system with bad QBs, and having Jamarcus, DMF, Louis Murphy, and others will jumpstart him as a threat. It is a gamble. But not any more than taking any other WR. But again, DHB fits the NEED more than the other WRs, not because of his speed, but because he has the potential to stretch the field and draw double teams.
It’s easy to second-guess the Raiders and say they should have traded down. But that’s assuming they have takers. The Jets already moved up to take Sanchez, so it’s unlikely anyone else would. Maybe they could have drafted Crabtree, then worked out a deal with SF or someone else interested in him. Or maybe SF would have simply taken someone else now that Crabtree is off the board if they didn’t want him that badly. We really don’t know, and it’s pointless second-guessing at this point. I mean, I would have loved it if the Raiders could trade down, still get DHB, and add a few later picks to fill their roster. Maybe they tried it and it didn’t work. Maybe they had talked with SF and they weren’t interested in giving up a few picks for Crabtree. A lot of stuff happens that we don’t see, and we just have to take what we got. And sometimes, that means taking someone slightly higher than where people thought that person would go.
by hulkweazel on May 5, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Youre really twisting yourself up in knots in order to make these points, weazel. Youre making a lot of assumptions and a lot of leaps in order to do so.
I can see where you draw the comparison between Crabs and Moss questions-wise. And thats valid. If we want to make that comparison the metaphor still holds up. Like I said. Its about minimizing risk. The questions around Crabs (diva, foot injury) are no where near the level of those around Moss when he came out. The kid was a pot smoker. And where did he go? He dropped from where he was projected in the late teens (where Dallas didnt take him) to early 20’s where the Vikes did.
The example I was making with DHB is that where Dallas did its best to make an informed decision and still got it wrong. Al Davis did his homework and where he must have seen the SAME thing everyone else saw (fits my system notwithstanding), he STILL pulled the trigger. Thereby he introduced MORE risk to the draft pick and increased the probability he’d end up being wrong.
You dont make a wild decision on guy and then LATER look for justification to have taken him. Saying, “see? two other teams had mitchell ranked pretty high” is simply too risky when you have THIRTY other team who didn’t.
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 6, 2009 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
PS
to wrap up my point on assumptions. youre making a LOT of them.
1. Youre assumuing Mitchell’s rising on teams draft board was the correct assumption and not an anomaly
2. Youre assumuing DHB’s rising on teams draft board was the correct assumption and not an anomaly
3. Youre assuming Crabtree isnt a good citizen in Raiderland because thats the team who drafted him
4. Youre assuming that passing on Crabtree (or Monroe, Maybin, Orakpo, etc) is the correct strategy. Other teams that “passed him up” did so because they didnt like him and not because they had more pressing needs. Something the Raiders didnt do.
5. Youre assuming the Raiders assesment that “he’s not productive because of his system” and not because he’s not as good as other wr’s on the board. To quote dram5780 in his above post, “Occam’s Razor: ‘The Simplest Solution Is Usually The Best’”
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 6, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
janikowski pick was terrible too..
we could have gotten him 3 rounds later. in that first round, we could have added a position player that could still be helping us.
for a first round pick, janikowski should have been the best kicker ever, instead he is just ok. Look at his accuracy compared to the league. average.
Dont get me wrong, janikowski has been good for the raiders, but we could have gotten more for that pick and still gotten janikowski.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree he was a bad pick, but
Sebastion is NOT an “ok” kicker, he’s great!
by r8er.4.life on May 3, 2009 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why was he a reach?
The only way he was a reach is if you believe Kiper’s board. You have no idea what other teams thought about the respective WR’s. It is rumored, have no idea if true or not, that the Giants were trying to trade down for DHB. The fact that some blowhards on ESPN were screaming that two WR’s in a spread offense were the best does not make them the best. This rumor that DHB has bad hands is just not true, and has no basis of fact, but like NBA players who come in the league the blowhards always must tell us something negative about their shooting, even if it is not true.
You can argue if you wish that they should have drafted Raji or Monroe, that is fine and a legitimate argument from your perspective but to say that drafting DHB was a reach makes no sense. The entire slot process is made up by guys who don’t have teams with needs to fill.
by Laoren on Apr 28, 2009 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what the hell are you talking about
you guys drafted Crabtree because he was the "best "player available when you guys could have drafted Orakpo.
who the hell is gonna throw crabtree the ball?… during the draft after the eagles drafted maclin, they said Donovan McNabb had a new toy. the whole time i was watching the draft, not once did anybody mention Shaun Hill… how hilarious would it had been to hear someone say"Shaun hill has a new toy to play with"
I'm gametime_gsw, and i aprove this message.
by gametime_gsw on Apr 28, 2009 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tortilla IS GONNA CRY IN THE CAR. lol lol lol lol
WIN LOSE OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I assume your talking about the same “experts” that said asomugha was a reach?
by RaidersNation on Apr 29, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do I have your Todd Christensen Plaque?
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 29, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saint it is more than Kool Aid your drinkin
LOL Buddy
Hey you going to Freddie’s bachelor party this weekend? We can discuss it over BL’s while lookin at ….
I am buried at work, ORCL’s year end but wife is letting me run free Sat.
by Bud Light on Apr 28, 2009 7:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
While looking at the Pacquiao Fight?
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 29, 2009 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If DHB
Played @ Texas Tech he would be a top 5 pick
If M. Crabtree played @ Maryland he would’nt be a 1st round pick.
The system matters…The QB matters
DHB didnt have either.
by dodgers2009 on Apr 28, 2009 8:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not saying that
DHB will be an all pro
but think about it
by dodgers2009 on Apr 28, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
woulda shoulda coulda....
then DHB should have gone to a system where he would have put up those types on stats. Then we wouldnt even be having this conversation.
Stud players still put up stats no matter what the situation is. C johnson? J rice?
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you don't watch much football do you?
jerry rice wasn’t a college stud, and when he got to the pros he only had 3 hall of fame qb’s throwing to him. chad johnson, if stud players put up stats no matter what, then why didn’t he put up super stats with a crappy qb last year? system and qb is VERY important for a reciever’s #’s
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry your saying...
jerry rice is only the best wr ever because of his qbs? Garcia and Gannon are not hall of famers. Anyway, your comment that jerry rice is ony the best wr ever because of his qb is debatable.
As for the chad johnson argument, thats simple…. he is not a stud (anymore). when was his last good year? 2 years ago?
yes qb is important, but not 100% important. Calvin Johnson and Antonio Bryant dont have Hof qbs throwing to them.
by gl12ox05 on May 1, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raiders Drafted Well for their Needs Verses Choice of Draftees
DHB will draw double-coverage freeing up other opportunities as he screams down the field and he played his college career double-teamed. Mitchell will once again put the fear in receivers over the middle, runningbacks in the flat and quarterbacks on the run.
The top two receivers had unknowns and DHB is a known quantity, perfectly suited for Raider style coaching/receiving Russell’s bombs.
Michael Mitchell will become the new Ronnie Lott which immediately upgrades our defense front, allowing them to concentrate on sacks every play.
The other draftees have their opportunity to win a job which inspires the players in competition.
In view of the draft choices verses needs, I grade this draft an ’ A ’ since we did not have to give away the farm in next years draft to meet our current targets.
Richard the Raider
by Raider in Dallas on Apr 28, 2009 8:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
THAT WORD IS COMING FROM TEXAS PEOPLE
-Welcome-
WIN lose OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a Bolts fan, I'd give the Raiders an A++!!! Keep up the good work Al!! The only
downside is that Al’s ruining what was once a great rivalry (not that I don’t mind kicking your A$$ all over the place). A few more of these drafts and I’m going to start feeling bad for you guys (but not yet).
by Bacon on Apr 28, 2009 8:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad the RAIDERS NATION gets to take the bolts out first
It’s going to be perfect. Get ready we come’n
WIN lose OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a spark fan huh?
yeah you guys had what 8 wins last year? super team, you just paid an undersized speedster more money than half the starting rb’s in the league. norv turner a real winner there wants to give the ball to LT more? i say yes please do, then he’ll break down sooner in the season and all you’ll have is that really fast little guy who will get hurt about mid season due to the pounding he’ll have to take.
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
B grade, keep up the great work -SAINT-
WIN lose OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Asomugha is key
something that no one is mentioning is the fact that DHB is going to get the chance to compete every single day against the best corner in the league.
the way Asomugha explains that competing against Randy Moss day in and day out made him the player that he is. DHB is going to have that to experience to make him the top WR in the league….Cable knows what hes doing in building this team
by los_raiders on Apr 28, 2009 11:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That is a FANTASTIC Point:
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 29, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on Apr 30, 2009 3:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
AN YOU KNOW THIS, MAN !!!!
WIN lose OR TIE RAIDERS TILL I DIE !!!!
by 8fog3town1 on Apr 28, 2009 11:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Draft choices can be judged by talent, attitude, and how well they fit a team
The two biggest Raider needs were (1) stopping the run and (2) stopping other teams from tailoring their defense to stopping the Raider’s offensive strength: their run.
Part of the former problem was that we didn’t have safties who could tackle. Michael Mitchell is both fast and can tackle.
To stop our run, teams would put most of their defenders near the line of scrimmage. This can be stopped by having a speedy receiver who can get off the line of scrimmage and quickly get down field, drawing defenders down field. DHB with his size and speed is perfect for this duty.
I think Mitchell and DHB fit the Raiders’ needs well. A slower receiver like Crabtree would not have helped our running attack as much as DHB.
by Michael_Mc on Apr 29, 2009 1:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Your biy DHB is going to blow past people and then either be overthrown by your crappy QB or
drop the ball becasue he has hands of stone (not what you’re looking for in a wideout). “But at least he got by the secondary”, that will be your new mantra
by Bacon on Apr 29, 2009 4:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially Your Secondary:
Your receivers will see a ton of #34 in their faces and your DB’s will be seeing a lot of Heyward-Bey from the backside. Get used to it!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by saint on Apr 29, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And..
Who was the number one receiver for the Dolt’s last year? I’m not sure- I don’t think they’re WR corps came to play last year..
I like to believe my best HITS border on Felonious ASSAULT
-Jack Tatum
by DarksideJU08 on Apr 29, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and your team is who?
unless you are a fan of a team with a probowl qb i’m not sure you know what a good qb is. Not saying that russel is a god in the pocket but he’s getting better, after all this will only be his 3rd year. and hands of stone, i’m seeing alot of stats of his td’s and such, but does anyone have the # of times he was thrown to, the # of passes that were made that season, to compare to his receptions?
by ThirteenFox on Apr 30, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The infamous Draft
I agree with the Saint on this one. All these highly paid player guru’s by the end of the season should be eatting mudd or down on their knee’s paying homage to the mighty Raiders and our draft picks. But, I bet no matter how succesful our picks our “These Raider Hater’s” will still condem our picks. So let them hate Rock on Raiders.
by ChocolateBuddha on Apr 29, 2009 10:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great debate
Guys I’m new to the forum so take it easy on me.
After digesting everything about the Raider draft, notably on Day 1 there is nothing that surprises me. About two months ago when everyone was saying Maclin over Crabtree because he’s faster I immediately replied “well, if they want speed they’ll just take DHB”. Obviously it worked out that way.
Crabtree brought I think 427 people on stage when he was drafted. Anyone turned off? He brought an entourage to Cleveland, who was reportedly not impressed. I have always stuck up for this guy as an impact collegiate receiver (ie saying in 2007 he should have been a Heisman candidate despite being a frosh then) but this is the NFL.
Perhaps everyone is mesmerized by Crabtree catching the game winner against UT, as some were by Nicks’ bowl game performance. Regarding Nicks, it seems to have overshadowed him showing up to his pro day overweight – a huge red flag. A LOT goes into this stuff guys. We’re not in the interview rooms, on the field at pro days, chatting with general managers… this is not information we have.
All of that being said I wanted Monroe at #7. He is a high character guy and settles down the LT spot which has been a revolving door. I am optimistic Michalczik (sp?) can coach up the handful of guys added to this OL this offseason, but as we all heard Cable called the top 4 guys “Cadillacs”. I feel like the OL is now simply solid whereas dominance is needed.
Quick hit on Mitchell because this post is too long already. I want to believe he can be more than just another reach, but it’s hard to figure out why he wasn’t on the all-MAC whatever team. Peter King (who I despise) pointed out he wasn’t even 3rd team? Is that right? Maybe his potential will be realized and we can get another ET, Woodson, whatever you want to say … any impact at safety is what I’m getting at, not strict comparisons. It has been too long. 1 1/2 years of Rod and tell me another great safety since getting back to Oakland?
by gregorycox on Apr 29, 2009 2:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree entourage not a big deal...
I always thought that a WR needed to have an ego. They need to think that everytime they touch the ball they will score. They just cant be a disease and get into everyone’s face about it. Even Jerry Rice made comments about not getting the ball in his 49er days.
But, I agree with you, if we didnt go crabtree, Monroe or oher would have been fine at #7. Then if Al absolutely had to have DHB, then trade back into the first round to get him.
Mitchell is a reach talent wise. but I am not going to be so upset with this pick because I like the attitude he brings to the field. People will be afraid to go over the middle with him hanging around. I just hope his talent can make it in the nfl.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 29, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
how were they gonna draft monroe at at number 7
then move back into the first round to get DHB, when they wanted to move up from the 7 spot because they tought somebody else between picks 1-6 would get him?… i really though people were making this up to be funny but the raiders really did want to move up to get DHB, tom cable said it himself, that the night before he started panicing because he thought somebody would draft him.
I'm gametime_gsw, and I approve this message.
by gametime_gsw on Apr 29, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but no one 1-6 did draft him....
so they had options. If they would have traded up to get him would have been nightmarish! we would have lost picks to pick him….ugh!!
by gl12ox05 on Apr 30, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rice vs. Crabtree
There is a huge difference between the GOAT and a guy who is more likely to be compared to a goat than the best ever to walk on an NFL field. I mean seriously, don’t even breathe Rice’s name. This Crabtree kid hasn’t put on an NFL uniform unless you count the ones on the stage or press conferences.
I get the “gotta have attitude” aspect as a defense, but I don’t agree with it being a necessity. Remind me the last time Harrison spoke up about anything? The answer is never. If you’re looking for an NFL comparison I would say Harrison is closer because Crabtree isn’t going to run by anyone, or split the defense after the catch.
Crabtree’s niche should be catching anything thrown in his direction, high, low or outside – and shutting up about it. He’s never going to dominate NFL defenses the way he did college defenders who are lining up with the rest of us stiffs looking for work. So this whole “Look at me! I can’t be stopped!” attitude is not going to fly at the NFL level.
Week #1 over the middle when he gets leveled by Karlos Dansby I wonder if his entourage from the Cleveland visit or draft stage will be there to tell him how great he is. Probably not. Then again, when DHB quietly makes his 30-40 catches for 500-550 yards and 7 TD no one will be saying this time next year the Raiders made the right move, but for THEIR system (and locker room) they did. I like how DHB handles interviews 10x better than Crabtree.
by gregorycox on Apr 29, 2009 5:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
im not comparing the two...
All I’m saying is that all of the good WR’s have an ego. They all think like they are the “shit” and everytime they touch the ball, they can go the distance. So the fact that crabtree brought an entourage, doesnt bug me. So, yes the “look at me! I can’t be stopped!” attitude does fly in the NFL. Another example would be Antonio Bryant. Everyone thought he was a problem child because in cleveland and SF he kept saying give me the damn ball. finally he got those balls in TB and he became a pro bowler. So again, just about every receiver should have that attitude. Just dont take it to the media or in your coaches/qb’s face.
If he would have started bashing teams through the media…. that would be a major red flag.
by gl12ox05 on Apr 30, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our draft wasn't that good
but it wasn’t that bad either. They gave us bad grades because we’re the Raiders, and their ESPN. Big rivalry there. Probably our biggest one, lol.
by r8er.4.life on Apr 29, 2009 6:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
lurked for a while, first post.
i agree with the small minority in here that we should have gotten more value for our 7th pick. either trade down or draft BPA. then trade up into the late 1st to try and get DHB. i don’t follow the draft close enough to really have an opinion of who might become a better receiver, but like some of you guys have said, its going to matter what kind of system these players get drafted into. you can have the best player but if you don’t use him the right way then he becomes a waste. i loved how crabtree played in college but now the NFL is different game and level. we’ll see how he adapts and how the 49ers use him. i hope DHB ends up being a good productive if not great WR. i know since the losing to the Bucs at the superbowl we have all been suffering as fans.
i really don’t think its the drafts that really hurt us. we have some very good young talent on this team from the last 5 drafts. i think its about putting it together, but i have no confidence with the ownership, front office, and coaching staff. i think thats been our biggest problem. i hope Cable turns it around but i really don’t have too much confidence in him.
this offense is only going to work if we have a good OL, do we? if we do then it comes down to the QB. i really don’t think JR is going to be a very good NFL QB. i hope i’m wrong.
by HALO_86 on Apr 30, 2009 12:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Draft Picks
Al Davis is still smarter than most of us! I get the feeling that everyone will soon realize just how sharp this guy is. It looks like Al and his crew really did their homework this time. I might be a little crazy, but it’s more fun this way. I get the distinct feeling that the Raiders are going to come out real strong this year and make all those a-holes at ESPN look like the dummies they really are.
GRADE: A++
by RWE on Apr 30, 2009 10:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I Think So Also
J-Mac got arm, D-Mac is unique, DHB got the hands, and he can move his feet.
Niners got Hill, he is really cheap, now they got Crabtree, hey don't fall asleep.
by Rayder K on May 1, 2009 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow… gl12ox05 is all over the map! If you think draft analysts know what NFL scouts know, then you’re either really young or just a bit naive. If you give the Raiders a grade based on the “expert” analysts’ mock draft, I agree they get an “F.” But take a look at some other mock drafts… some had the Raiders picking DHB at #7. How can that be?
Well, they considered his YPC and the offensive scheme he was playing in. Kiper Jr’s system is simply best player available. He had Crabtree over DHB because of stats. There are obviously MANY other variable that should be considered.
By the way, how hard is it to base your mock draft on stats? Give me a couple of hours with an Excel spreadsheet… and… BAM!! I’d have a BPA list like Mr. Kiper. There’s more to it than than, gl12ox05. If you think Davis/Cable picked based on the 40 and vertical leap, than I feel sorry for your short-sightedness.
by johnyork1 on May 1, 2009 5:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont care about kiper...
I dont even know what his board looked like. Some of the other draft boards had us picking dhb for the very reason we did get him. They know that A Davis has a hard on for 40 times.
Thanks for telling me I am short sightedness was when I am talking about the economics of this pick at #7. So you DONT think Davis (not cable) based on DHB’s 40 time? Please enlighten me, what would that reason be? I did see Cable’s interview after the draft. It sure seems that want DHB to run down the field. You dont think he was picked based on his 40 time? Did you see the 2nd rnd pick? Mitchell is no slow poke either.
Yes, stats are a piece of my research. but I also looked at film. Youtube has highlights on just about every college player out there. Based on what I saw, I thought Crabtree was by far and away the best player the Raiders would have had a shot at. If not Crabtree, I would have been fine with Raji or any of the OL.
There is one thing about the experts. They get their info from nfl insiders, sources, etc… So you can get an idea where players should fall. Yes, some people had the raiders pick dhb at #7 (and a dead clock is right 2 times a day), but the vast majority of experts thought DHB was a late first round pick.
by gl12ox05 on May 4, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow!!!
you almost sound intelligent there John… Like you may actually know what youre talkin about. But alas youre still wrong. Like a broken clock is for 23:58 minutes out of everyday.
you argue like a republican…you spout supposed facts and figures that either dont hold up to further scrutiny or you hope are not further scrutinized.
Now please…could you tell us WHAT it is that made Davis/Cable pick DHB over Crabtree. Now before you open your yap. you CANNOT use the following arguments as they have been disproved already:
1) please dont tell us that Crabtree is a diva
2) please dont tell us about their difference in QBs as neither was drafted
3.) and you CANNOT discount the so-called draft experts taht SOME had DHB ahead of crabtree. As you cannot discount the analysts as buffoons and then point to the one that had YOUR guy ahead of crabtree.
BTW…the ONLY analyst that had dhb ahead of crabtree was mayock. and he did that cuz he knows what retard Al Davis is
Wreck 'em, Tech!
by Tortilla Pirate on May 4, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is why blogging is dangerous
This is why people like you and others should not be blogging; your knowledge is beyond pathetic.
Weren’t you the same guy that loved Huff, Gallery, Gibson, Buchanon, Walker, Harris, Hall, Walker, and so many other picks and signings?
You are beyond biased; I watched Bey play in 4 games and he didn’t catch a pass in 2 of them.
Crabtree was the best WR in college; Bey was not even the best in his conference with only 13 TD’s in 3 years.
The bears draft worse than the Raiders (well almost) so who cares if they wanted him.
You are a part of the Raider cult not the Raider nation; you deal with what might be instead of what is; keep dreaming; your comments are laughable at best.
by jpm4444 on May 2, 2009 7:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
who was DHB's quarterback?
dont you think that that makes quite a big difference. DHB was also getting doubled every game in a run first offence who basically ran 2 wideouts exclusively whereas Crabtree was in the spread where it is a lot harder to double him and alot more space to run in because the defence is ‘spread’ out. Crabtree also caught a lot of short in’s and hitches which acounts for a large % of his catches and yards which DHB didnt as he was always running deep pro style routes.
I’m not saying DHB is better or vice versa we will have to see on the field but you definitely cannot compare stats when the conditions/systems they played under where polar opposites.
For the same reason that Harrell didnt even get drafted is why the DHB/Crabtree comparison is almost impossible to make a clear opinion on, stats of QB’s and Recievers in spread offences are over inflated.
You are also saying that the knowledge is is beyond pathetic well how about you come up with some points that have not been regurgitated on TV an infinite number of times since the draft you sound like a parrot.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
by Ozraider on May 3, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Business of Football
I cannot believe how many people are having these crazy conversations. What makes them crazy is neither of these guys have straped it on and proven their worth on an NFL field. I don’t care how great you were in college it does not translate to greatness in the NFL, PERIOD. Everyone has their opinion but the bottom line is this, we can agree or disagree with the choices. We DO NOT own the team or coach it. We DID NOT scout or interview any of the players. We do not pay their saleries. Al Davis has won three superbowls and built the Raiders into one of the most successful sports organizations in the sporting world. Tell me, if you had accomplished that with a business, you are going to keep on doing it your way. If you owned a business you may follow some of the industry standards but you are also going to do things your way because it is YOUR business. I am the BIGGEST Raider fan on the planet. I grew up as a ball boy for them and have been a loyal fan. I am also someone that realizes that this is a business and everyone has their own model. You do not have to agree or disagree with it. You only need to realize one thing, IT IS NOT YOUR TEAM, IT IS MR. DAVIS’S TEAM AND HIS BUSINESS MODEL AND IN THE END IT HIS DECISION THAT COUNTS!!!!
by oaktownfan3333 on May 6, 2009 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














