Silver And Black Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation College Twitter List

Russell or Garcia?



I am a firm believer in letting a QB have the neccesary time to develop and allowing a team to put all the pieces in place before a final assesment of that QB can be accuratley made. This offseason has seen some troubleing things in terms of Russll accuacy and decision making and has also seen Garcia perform well enough to gain support of at least one teammate publicly. Newly signed Kieth Davis said to a reporter he would like to see Garcia play based on his performnce at the OTA's.

So with a 23 year old QB who is hopefully the man of the future and face of the franchise continueing to develop this year Garcia is most likely going to start the season on the bench. This is understandable to most people watching the situation form the outside but recently i have been thinking about the QB battle that could take place in training camp.

This offseason has seen  a group of veteran players arrive that look like they may be ready to win now i ask everyone reading this what would u rather see happen Russell given the job even if he doesnt technically earn it or an honest competion between the two QB's and the best man taking control of the team?

Coach Cable has indicated that there is a lack of leadership on the team as whole and Garcia who has loads of experience and is a proven winner is the QB most capable of filling that role of field general. How can a team feel good about who they're playing with at the most important position on the team when u know that there is someone better sitting on the sideline.I am all for Russell playing and in my heart i want him to beat of Garcia but i want the tema to win too. In the NFL u never know what can happen year to year and if the Raiders have a chance at being last years Titans (think Kerry Collins replacing Vince Young) then i want to win now. The playoffs are not out of reach in a weak division witht the right QB we have the RB's and the WR's to compete offensively. Garcia would not have to carry the team just manage the game and limit mistakes and see what happens.

I know that Garia isnt the long term solution but Russell will be 24 this year and another year learning the offense and developing the work ethic and maturity it takes to win in the NFL might be a good thing for him. When he does win the job based on his perfromance he will have the full support of the team and the fans. Russell will hopefully be able to draw on this years experince for motivatiion to keep his role as starter when he earns it.

Poll
Who do u want to start at QB this year?
Jamarcus Russell
89 votes
Jeff Garcia
54 votes

143 votes | Poll has closed

2 recs  |  Comment 112 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

If we are serious about trying for the playoffs and Russel struggles and we still have a shot

you go with garcia but i voted russel cause i would hate to see him be like vince young

by dubzfan on Jun 30, 2009 6:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

There is no way

That Russell will not start the season Tom Cable said there is no competition the only way that Jeff will see the field is if Jamarcus gets injured but, of course he can see the field as much as he wants on the bench.

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jun 30, 2009 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Given the current situation, it has to be JaMarcus Russell. We must develop the future now because otherwise we’ll be facing a tougher climb to try to get back to the top. Having Jeff Garcia start won’t solve anything. We probably won’t make the playoffs either way from where I stand and even if Garcia can take us there, which isn’t likely at all, we’ll be bounced in the first round.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 30, 2009 8:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Garcia will probably retire after this year

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jun 30, 2009 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeahp

and benching JRUSS for him would only strain our relationship with Russel.

at the end of the day we would be left with nothing at all.

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 1, 2009 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

J-Russ

starting Garcia is an interesting idea, but long-term, it only pushes the Raiders back a year. If Russell gets hurt in the middle of the season (like he did last year), Garcia would still be a strong option to come into the game while he’s injured. It would be much better than sending Walter and Tui out there!!

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jun 30, 2009 10:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Russell

I’d like to see Russell start and finish every game this season.

Sure, if he fails to hit any kind of stride at all by around mid-season, then you can give Garcia a shot at it. However, if Garcia fails to make anything change dramatically, I say ride out Russell until he’s in the playoffs or the ground. He’s got talent, the Raiders just have to find it and make it flourish.

If Garcia starts game one this season, it will be because Russell would be injured. No other way around it.

(please allow for the almost likely possibility of Al going off his meds again and doing something completely retarded.)

by Tyshizzle on Jul 1, 2009 2:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Benching Russell

would be a shot to his confidence, which can be deadly to a quarterback. I’m really starting to be sorry that they ever brought in Garcia at this point. The Raiders are getting better, but they are not ready for the playoffs yet. Most of the offense in particular is very young players, and they do need the time to develop, not just Russell. The receivers, the running backs, Miller, etc. The Raiders must not get impatient. Bush and McFadden need to be the backbone of the offense this year. And we sure as hell don’t need a quarterback controversy like they have across the Bay.

Maybe it’s because people are used to the Raiders building with free agents instead of through the draft that some people are getting so impatient.

by rightnasty on Jul 1, 2009 9:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i was watching espn today

and that faggot Mark Schlerth (aka former bronco and admitted raider hater) went on to say that Garcia will start this season.

its stupidity like that which leads to the speculation and fuels to the rumor that Garcia will start.

Cable has never ONCE said/hinted that Garcia will have a shot to start. As a matter of fact he went on to say that its for sure that Russell will start every game this season.

The only reason we even have this discussion is because of dumb fucks like Schlereth to begin with.

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 1, 2009 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My intention was to create a debate

I know that Russell is the unquestioned starter and will be a so long as AL DAVIS is in charge he loves Russell and with good reason he has shown some promise i just wanted to know what the fans thought about a possible vet on the bench that could lead us to the playoffs in a weak division

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 1, 2009 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But at what cost?

We have one winning year and Garcia fades off into the sunset.

Now we have a major dilemma on hand. By benching our young QB and completely alienating him, do you honestly think he wants to play for this team next year?

We have to take our lumps with Russell and if hes not our solution we can begin to replace him with a new solution. When you don’t have a 60 million dollar investment on your bench and hes still only in his 3rd season (second as starter) then you speculate to who starts. At this time he is our franchise QB and is NOT to be replaced by a 40 yr old, one year filler.

I can not begin to explain how tired I am of explaining this. Garcia will not win us a Superbowl. If one winning year at the expense of the next 5 sounds good to you then I really don’t know what to tell you.

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 1, 2009 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly

One 2002 year followed by some 2003-2008 years is what will happen if Garcia starts this season.

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 1, 2009 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See what I wonder is

Why did the Bucs let Garcia go when they have a rookie quarterback that use his mentoring, and when their own QB situation is sort of up in the air.

by rightnasty on Jul 3, 2009 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Russell starts...

He needs more playing time. Give him something like 3 games. if he is playing Tavarius Jackson bad, bench him and give Garcia a shot. If Garcia fails, finish out the season with Russell. Only the coaching staff can evaluate how good Russell is playing the first 3 games.

For the future, we need to let Russell play. But this is only his second full season. and If he is not ready, then so be it. No need to throw the season away if Garcia can lead us to the playoffs.

by gl12ox05 on Jul 1, 2009 10:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted Garcia

In my opinion, if they were thinking “long term” they would of drafted a QB that could
a.) Tie his own shoes
b.) Read and understand a playbook
c.) Have the GIVE-A-SHIT to want to better himself and his team

Russell has a huge arm and can throw the ball a mile but if he is just guessing that there is going to be someone close to catch it, he might as well spike the ball 3 times and go back to the sideline and put his fur coat on.

by Black and Silver Express on Jul 1, 2009 9:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

u may not like him

but with the investment we have in him, the min we bench him we declare him a bust. once we declare him a bust its rebuilding time again. 5 more years wasted so if anything, HE HAS to become a good qb or the raiders are fucked again.

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 2, 2009 3:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is that

no one can make him a good QB except him.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 2, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

People probably said similiar things about Stabler back in the day

Drinking up a storm when he wasn’t on the field, a loose cannon, a troublemaker. And unlike Russell, he threw a ton of interceptions (30 in one season). But he took them to a Super Bowl victory.

by rightnasty on Jul 3, 2009 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly, coddling him wont get the desired results

he must realize that when someone is better than u they’re gonna start and when ur better through hard work and fim study and so on then u win the starting job . NOthing is supposed to be given to anyone in the NFL u earn it then u know u deserve it. Thats my pint he is gonna be 25 when next year comes does anyone think thats too old to get the starting job back if Garcia win s the job for the 2009 season?

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 2, 2009 10:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No.

It’s not too old. It’s just highly unlikely he’ll play in 09 if Garcia starts. JR will never be better than a mediocre QB.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 2, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

geez

did we not learn from josh mccown, kerry collins, etc. We need to get some sort of consistency at the QB position.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 2, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

do u realize that garcia has a better than 90 QB rating the last three years one in philly and the last two in tampa he could very well be what kerry collins was to tennesee last year. why is the super bowl out of the question did anyone see arizona in the super bowl last year

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 2, 2009 10:32 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

firstly

garcia is not warner.
we dont have a boldin fitz combo.
kerry collins d was great, our defense is not nearly as good as theirs.
superbowl is out of the question.
IMO and i think the smart move is what were doing russell is our guy and now weve started to give him people to throw to, and hopefully improved the o line

by pablopaul25 on Jul 2, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeahp

ive made that point like 1000 times over. im tired of hearing garcia as a starter

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 2, 2009 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But

Garcia is a WINNER!!!!! He might not have the size or arm that Russell has, but he works his ass off to win. Thats the kind of guy we need leading our team.

And as far as labeling Russell as a bust, then so be it. He has done anything to prove otherwise.

by Black and Silver Express on Jul 3, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what has garcia won?..nothing..who cares how many games he wins if he cant bring a ring…so you would rather win more games make the playoffs get blown out in the playoffs then suffer 6 more years like the last 6 while we look for another qb because the confidence in russell would be shot..thats just dumb

by pablopaul25 on Jul 3, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats exactly what I want…. I’m tired of the Raiders being the laughing stock of the NFL!!!

Your right Garcia hasn’t won a ring yet but he wins games and makes the players around him better. Whats the point of drafting anyone on the offensive side of the ball if you don’t have someone that can make them better? Whats the point of drafting DHB if it’s going to take another 6 years before we have a QB that understands whats going on?

If we had a QB that did his job and did it right maybe the o-line would want to block for him, maybe our good WRs would want to stay around, and maybe we wouldn’t need 3 RBs to carry all the load. Wouldn’t it suck to work your ass off EVERY DAY for nothing, because the boss drafted some bum and gave him alot of money so he thinks he has a free ride.

by Black and Silver Express on Jul 3, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea your right the reason the oline didnt block was because russell missed some passes..that doesnt even make sense…everyone needs to just do their jobs and everything will be fine…i think it is very underrated how well russell played despite all hes been through with arguably the least amount of talent in the league around him last year…if you havent noticed running and defense wins championships..if those aspects step up maybe we wouldnt have to depend on one player to try to win games…thats what winning franchises do…not depend on one person even at the qb position

by pablopaul25 on Jul 3, 2009 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pablo

bro ive made the same point your making 1000 times over so far and some of these guys dont get it.

russell finished last season strong, he showed signs of becoming what we envisioned when we selected him. so now because the media is pushing it, all of a sudden russell is a bust?

these guys obviously dont know jack shit about football if they think jeff garcia will take us to the superbowl. he was brought in to be a back up, deal with it.

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 4, 2009 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

u really thingk we dont get it

its called a conversartion u come up with facts to support one side and we’ll do the same …its not that i support one over the other and if u dont think i realize as an organization the raiders would be better off with russell becomeing a good QB ur wrong
i want to win with a good QB… AL DAVIS wants to win now he is 80 years old he has no time for a five year project

 i thought it would be cool to see what poeple thouht … if russell comes out strong in camp give him the job if he sux then bench his ass thats my point may the best man win

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 4, 2009 6:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i dont get why RUSSELL supports

can stand to think of an open competition why? scared hes not any good.. if garcia is not any good then he shoould dominate him and if he does give him the job if not then make him get better before hes a starter for NFL teram

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 4, 2009 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

garcia

is better now.

in the long run russell will be much better

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 5, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we have an open competition

Garcia would probably win. But in the long-term the Raiders really hurt themselves by doing this. No one supporting your cause has given any legitimate facts of upside that Garcia can provide over Russell.

oh, except that “he’s a winner”.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 5, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the upside is winning games

thats the point of the NFL to win Games things may or may not happen in the future im not sure if uve ever heard the saying "a bird in hand is worth two in the bush " it means that garcia is a proven commodoty he’s the bird in hand look at his above 90 QB his last three years hes got over ten years experience in the NFL there is clearly an upside no one can seriously doubt that we would win more games this year with him under center

 listen my point is this when Russell wins the job give it to him or else signing Garcia is throwing money in the toilet let the guy compete if he’s better than he plays if hes not than Russell plays how else is russell gonna get better

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 5, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is

we can’t cripple Russell now. We invested to much money in him. This isn’t a black and white situation. While I’d like Garcia to start and we would win more games w/ him, we will eventually have Russell on the field. We need to develop him now. We can’t bench him and send the message that he’s not good enough. He’ll work even less than is reported.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the point of tyhe nfl is not to win games its to win championships firstly..there is no upside to garcia..weve seen the best he has and the best he has isnt good enough to bring a championship to this team..i mean it doesnt matter because russell will be starting but to hear ppl actually want to see garcia play is to me stupidity..for lack of a better word

by pablopaul25 on Jul 6, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the point of tyhe nfl is not to win games its to win championships

Do you not need to win games to win championships? Compared to Russell there’s a huge upside just due to his experience alone.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we dont have a championship team yet..thats what i think your failing to realize..it takes a team to win a championship..so to put garcia in there to win a few more games (maybe)..would be dumb at the expense of our franchise qb..we are not going to win a championship this year or the next most likely no matter who the qb is but we can set ourselves up for future championships if we give russell the time he needs to develop and continue to place peices around him and the rest of the team

by pablopaul25 on Jul 6, 2009 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 totally agree w/you

u can’t call the other side stupid because they don’t agree with you. they have actually provided legitimate points. thx brianmulhall for giving this blog the best debate it’s had in a LONG time..

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 6, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you cant compare what someone does in training camp to what someone does in games..all i know is the last games i saw of russell he was a stud and the last games i saw of garcia he was a bum

by pablopaul25 on Jul 4, 2009 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

AL Davis

Drafted this guy and is in love with his rocket arm and will not bench him and if Cable even thinks about it then, hopefully we can find another coach that could have fired this team up the way Cable ddi, we won’t bench Russell and he will start the season

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 4, 2009 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he wont be benched because he hasnt done anything to deserve being benched whether al davis likeshim or not

by pablopaul25 on Jul 4, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Al Davis likes him perhaps because of those 2 wins to end the year. Or because Russell has a lot more longterm value than Garcia…??

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 5, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

or because

he invested 68 Million in him?

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so why not give him a chance to justify that?

u can’t deny the longterm value russell has over garcia.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 6, 2009 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I personally

don’t see it.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 7, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't you say the same for Russell

Posted by Robby1987

“hmm Terrdell Sands on the market?

why not the guys a bum and wont work hard enough."

by Black and Silver Express on Jul 4, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

theres a reason some people never reach their full potentiail its called work ethic

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 4, 2009 7:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why is the super bowl out of the question did anyone see arizona in the super bowl last year

Arizona’s offense was dynamic. Warner, Fitzgerald and Boldin aren’t kids like Russell, McFadden and Heyward-Bey. I mean, you’re talking about the Super Bowl here. We haven’t made the playoffs since the 2002 season. You need to aim lower and more realistically.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Thought Arizona’s defense was lousy during the season, it really came together in the playoffs. I’d have bet money that it couldn’t contain the Eagles offense well enough to win, but they hung in there. Also did a pretty good job against the Steelers until that last past to Holmes.

by rightnasty on Jul 3, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i really believe that anyhting is possible year to year in nfl

there are countless examples from the saints in 2006 to miami last year and what kerry collins did in tennesee as well as warner in arizona
we have a good team thats not unrealistic optimism either
 if we can get solid offensive line play were solid look at our record at the end of last year we went 3-3 and thats with a rookie QB
we have weak division all we need to do is get into the playoffs and then see what happens any one can get hot

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 3, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

none of those are comparable to our team..the saints got drew bress arguably a top 3 qb in the league…miami got their star runningback back from injury solidified their line got the most accurate qb in nfl history i believe statistically and bolstered their defense…what did kerry colins do for the titans?…vince young was horrible the year before and they still made the playoffs..

We dont have a good anything yet..i believe this year we will have a good running game and a solid passing attack…hopefully the run defense will drastically improve forcing teams to pass on us which i think is a strong area of our game..you dont go from 5 wins to superbowl

by pablopaul25 on Jul 3, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cardinals fans said the same thing around this time

I’m not saying the Raiders will, cuz they’re odds are stacked against them. but rite now we’re 0-0 just like everyone else.

even when the cardinals made the playoffs they were just kind of a meh team. Most ppl thought they would get beat at home in the 1st round. It just goes to show that NFL is incredibly unpredictable

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 5, 2009 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the difference is the cardinals had a direction already..they already were a dominanat passing team..we dont dominate at anything..or havent proved to do so yet..not to mention the cardinals had 2 probowl recievers and a superbowl winning, former mvp type qb..we have none of that

by pablopaul25 on Jul 6, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we definitely don't have the probowl WRs

but perhaps a top 5 running game can compensate for that. And lets be honest, for the raiders, a top 5 rushing attack is not out of the question.

and last yr, everyone considered kurt warner a has-been and at the most a serviceable backup that will challenge Matt Leinart. No one thought of him as an MVP type QB in 2008…face it, every nfl season is unpredictable, especially when training camp hasn’t even started yet.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 6, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

everyone thought warner was a has been?..he threw 27 tds the year before last starting only 11 games…stats are tricky your not using the right one..just because you run for alot of yards that just means you run alot more than you pass..we were tenth in attempts per game, tenth in avg, tenth in 20+ yrd runs, 26th in rushing first downs, and only 9 rushing tds..so we are right around avg overall
i expect to do well running the ball though this year..hopefully the rushing tds will go up dramatically..we need to be the team to have a great yrd per carry avg and control more clock..we definitely need to put ourselves in better situations to run for first downs

by pablopaul25 on Jul 7, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you could say the same about passing...

But I never referred to total yards (because I agree with you, total yards ARE misleading). I’m talking about rushing stats such as YPC, rushing first downs, etc. Basically stats that do show a running game’s dominance. The raiders have three very talented backs in Fargas, Mcfadden and Bush. They have a hall of fame FB in Lorenzo Neal. Quality guards in Rob Gallery and Carlisle. If the WR corps and Defense contribute theres a good chance the raiders have a top 5 running game.

you thought warner was takin the cardinals to the super bowl?? Bullshit. he wouldn’t have even gotten a chance to start if Matt Leinart didn’t completely faceplant it during preseason.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 7, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i didnt think that team would make it to the superbowl..but clearly a guy isnt washed up throwing for 27 tds the year before last in less than a full season..and i agree we can have a dominant rushing attack but it depends alot on the oline and the recievers…if dhb can be our roddy white type reciever for now and develop maybe into a chad ochocinco it will force defenses to play honest and we will see a more consistant running attacj

by pablopaul25 on Jul 8, 2009 5:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

meh, i don't think DHB will do much this yr

rookie receivers rarely contribute this early. But hopefully, continued development from Schilens and Higgins along with the consistent play of Zach Miller might help our passing game a lot better than it was last yr.

which i guess isn’t saying that much. : (

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 8, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

your right that rookie recievers usually dont do much and i dont expect much but a great rookie season for him would be about 40ish catches 700 yrds..i really think dhbs situation is pretty good..he will have alot of man to man coverage off of play action which he was drafted to beat…i see our best reciever being miller obviously as well

by pablopaul25 on Jul 8, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

goes without saying. Miller is a BEAST

40 catches, 700 yards sound great!!! don’t have any numbers in front of me, but I dont think anyone got close to that last yr.

I don’t think DHB has to touch the ball to be particularly dangerous. Why not stick him in the slot and just have him run some go routes? at the very least, his speed prescence gives the D another thing to think about while potentially leaving Miller open in the center of the field?? haha, idk, just throwin shit against the wall.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 8, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

miller was tops at 20+ yrd receptions for te and that number should go up..miller should break 1000 should see his tds go up though

by pablopaul25 on Jul 8, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

depends on whether or not the raiders start to throw deep a lil more

but I definitely consider Miller along the Tight ends in football.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 8, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brian, A better question might have been

“Russell, Quinn or Kolb?”

The Raiders needed a long term QB, they had the first pick in the draft, and those were the top three choices. Would they have done better with Quinn or Kolb? I don’t think so.

by rightnasty on Jul 3, 2009 9:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ur right

and russel was drafted witht the knowledge that he would take time to develop the only thing i dont like is to hand him the job if he doesnt earn it
 it bothers me i want him to work his ass off to win the team over and be a leader through his work ethic maturity and ultimately his play on the filed and if that doesnt happen then i wanna see what garcia can do

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 3, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its ridiculous

ppl give him too much heat…you cant name a qb who has been put in a worse situation in this era and has succeeded even as much as russell did in his first year starting..time will tell but i think he’ll be good

by pablopaul25 on Jul 3, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh

Been telling people just that for months now. Unfortunately, they’re not going to take our word for it. Russell will just have to show them.

by rightnasty on Jul 3, 2009 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Raiders need to take a page out of the Cincinnati Bengals QB situation...

A couple years ago the Bengals had an experienced journeyman quarterback who was obviously better at that time than the high draft pick they had on the team. I am of course talking about Jon Kitna and Carson Palmer. The Bengals had a choice…

Choice 1-Play the more solid quarterback and maybe fight for a wild card spot, but eventually lose because of the physical limitations the veteran has.

or…

Choice 2-Play the franchise and develop him more, maybe not being a playoff contender immediately, but having the team better off in the long run because of the experience the top draft pick would attain.

The Bengals chose option 2, and although they have not been consistently in the playoffs, they have a franchise quarterback who will be there for 10 more years, and the experience he gained in playing over a quarterback who at the time was more solid than he was has given the Bengals a solid face of their franchise.

Anyone out there who wants Jeff Garcia to start ALSO wants this franchise to bet setback again for another couple of years. Dont lie. The maximum this team could do with jeff garcia is 500. And dont even think about the raiders getting a wildcard with garcia because the AFC South and AFC North are too loaded. Jamarcus was just starting to get it down the stretch. The absolutely worst thing for his development is take him out of the game and put in a journeyman qb who will be gone in 1 or 2 years.

All you unintelligent raider fans out their crying for Jeff Garcia are thinking with your egos and not your brains. You all say “The raiders have been losing long enough we have to win now!!!” But developing your star QB now and being a consistent playoff team later is alot better than going 9 and 7 or 8 and 8 with a journeyman QB in his first year and further setting back our 70 million dollar investment.

Jamarcus Russell-Starter(also franchise)

Jeff Garcia-Back Up(Probably for only 1 year because he will retire most likely)

by posey440 on Jul 3, 2009 8:37 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

posey

your absolutely right. maybe these guys will finally get it with a SOLID point like the one you just made.

rec’d

Punjabi by Nature

by Robby1987 on Jul 4, 2009 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

great example. The Bengals would be light years ahead of where they are now if they got Palmer a better surrounding cast…

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 5, 2009 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really, people are calling Russell a bust??

Based on what? Seriously, I want to know. I want to know what your criteria for a bust is. And I want to know what exactly you expected out of Russell last season, taking into full account the lack of support he had from the offense. Because if you’re perception of his work ethic is all that you’re going on, I’d like to know that too.

by rightnasty on Jul 4, 2009 7:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He still raises question

about his work ethic. If he doesn’t perform this year, then he’s a bust.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 4, 2009 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is not a bust

Russell had fine year as a rookie and he is doing the right things this year in the players only mini camp before trainig camp I would like to see hard work be his M.O. I just want a ompetition in camp to motivate him to become better than Garcia this year with his play on the field putting all this debate to rest. Im a Russell supporter and love his talent. I just want him to fulfill his potential and translate that into great play on the field

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 5, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A fine year as a rookie?

His true rookie season he held out and never made it to camp on time. Then last year he was called out even by his coach about work ethic and looked genuinely lost out there on the field. The passes he could get off, most were so far over the receivers head the people in the Goodyear blimps could catch them.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't chewed or swallowed yet, but I may be eating my words

Here is a link I found posted on the fanshots page.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/sports/ci_12615729?source=rss&nclick_check=1

I’m all for being proven wrong so hopefully this is the first step in Russell doing that.

by Black and Silver Express on Jul 5, 2009 8:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yea but then he skipped the final OTA

a step back unless it was excused which hasnt come out

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 5, 2009 2:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A lot

of the vets skipped various OTAs. They don’t need an excuse. The OTAs are voluntary.

by rightnasty on Jul 5, 2009 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i understand that

it just fuels the perception of a lack of work ethic its how he is percieved by the fans that is what is fueling this debate

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."

by BRIANMULHALL on Jul 5, 2009 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look

I’m not trying to give you a hard time here, but on this board and in other forums, an awful lot of people are looking for reasons to hate the man. I’m not saying that’s you, but it’s kind of sounding like that. I’m not sure why any Raiders fan would want to do that, but some of them definitely are. I could see it coming from Chiefs or especially Broncos fans.

I was ridiculed on the Chiefs board for comparing him to Matt Ryan, but when I look at the stats, for example sacks given up, I see the difference being in team effort. The Raiders gave up 39, Atlanta 17. I say if you plugged Russell into Atlanta’s offense, you’d get about the same stats as Ryan has. And vice versa.

by rightnasty on Jul 5, 2009 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Raiders gave up 39, Atlanta 17. I say if you plugged Russell into Atlanta’s offense, you’d get about the same stats as Ryan has. And vice versa.

Sometimes the situation you get drafted into makes all the difference in the world.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 6, 2009 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow... really?

I have to disagree with you… Ryan reads defenses better and has a higher football IQ (at from what I have seen so far).

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jul 6, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Russell could read defenses better and have a "higher football IQ"

if he had an amazing run game, competent receivers, an O-line that gave him time and a defense and special teams that bailed him out. I think rightnasty made a hell of a point. Because theres no way Matt Ryan wouldve had THAT rookie season in Oakland last yr. noone would.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 6, 2009 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

There’s Russell
http://www.nfl.com/players/jamarcusrussell/gamelogs?id=RUS539462

and Ryan
http://www.nfl.com/players/mattryan/gamelogs?id=RYA238179

Both had some good games and some really lousy ones. Granted, Ryan had more good ones, but again, it’s that high powered offense vs. the Raiders’. There is no fair comparison unless Russell gets traded to the Eagles or something.

by rightnasty on Jul 7, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.. to a point.

The Raiders DO have a better than average running game and their OL will be much better this year. We will see how Russell does this year.

BELIEVE ME… I want to be wrong about him! Please… let me be wrong.

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jul 21, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Ryan's attitude

was better and drive was higher.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

he’s planning his own mini camp thing w/ the receivers too.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 6, 2009 4:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Garcia = (9-7 or better), Russell = (7-9 or worse)

I think we have a team that can win now, IF we play Garcia. The new WR will learn from him, JaMarcus can learn from him on the bench, and he will become the ‘LEADER’ on an offense in sore need of leadership. I agree JaMarcus may be the future, but let him watch from the sideline this year to learn and think about working harder to become the player we drafted!

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jul 6, 2009 6:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

what is that based on?

it sounds like you just pulled that straight outta your ass. Russell beat Garcia. with a worse football team

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 6, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was not aware that

Offense goes against Offense?

Garcia averaged more yards per passing and less yards per sack than Russell.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 7, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

?? i don't understand ur point

who has a better defense last yr, the bucs or the raiders? the bucs, and it’s not close. Russell performed better against a better defense than garcia did against a worse defense.

i don’t know if those stats you provided are true, or if they are by a significant enough margin to even matter. But assuming they are, they don’t really offer much insight as to who would be the better QB. Garcia may have had more yards per pass because his playbook featured more downfield throws than Russell. This is probably true because Russell threw an awful lot of short passes last yr. The second stat only really tells us that Russell had a much worse O-line than Garcia. no disagreements here.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 7, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I looked them up on the NFL website for the game.

And I’m commenting on your comment:

what is that based on?

it sounds like you just pulled that straight outta your ass. Russell beat Garcia. with a worse football team

You compared 2 offense players. But Garcia’s numbers where a hair better. You can’t put the game on Russell alone. And if Harris were still in instead of Henderson, we would have probably lost.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 8, 2009 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough. Henderson >>> Harris

But I would still much rather see what Russell can do this yr as opposed to Jeff Garcia. I think like most older players, Jeff Garcia will continue to decline while Russell will only get better.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 8, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he watched from the sideline his real rookie year

it’s now time to prove he’s worth that money. You know the saying, put up or shut up.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 7, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That makes no sense?

If you start a quarter back and then bench him, isnt that telling him your not our guy, or your not good enough to lead this team? garcia cant stretch the ball down the field, thus making hey bey-bey(DHB’s new nickname) basicly useless. Garcia cant throw, he has a 8 year old girls arm. If you look at JaMarcus Russell and joe flacco’(the highly praised/overrated)s stats there really not that different. joe flacco has good recivers, thus the higher completion percentage. but if you look at russell’s last six games, he really stepped it up and became the leader, if we can go 3-3 through those games w/o McFadden,a new bush and Hey Bey-Bey plus murphy i really think we can go 8-8 this season and Russell can get much better, and look better than his counterparts flacco and ryan(who are both older than him by the way) as long as Al can get a freakin DT in the next draft we can finally return to our spot atop the AFC West:)

by Hey Bey-Bey on Jul 6, 2009 8:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dude

Jeff is vastly and hella more better than Jamarcus we should all know tha,t he is almost legendary status in my book from being able to go from system to system and be consistent and good. Jeff Garcia is the Best QB on the team but, Jamarcus is the best QB for the Raiders and Jamarcus will start against the Dolts on MNF and I will be a Eyewitness to that believe me.

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 6, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

legendary status?

dan marino. john elway. jeff garcia?

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 7, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

going from system to system?..garcia has played in the west coast offense his whole career..he should be able to do well..niners, philly, tampa bay all west coast offense

by pablopaul25 on Jul 7, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently the Bucs don't think so

ttp://www.bucem.com/2009/6/28/928092/bucs-inform-jeff-garcia-no-team

by rightnasty on Jul 7, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

JaMarcus is the starter for now. Period!

It is his job to lose. If JaMarcus doesn’t show signs of improvement than we need to move on to Garcia. I really want JaMarcus to do well but the signs are pointing to another disappointing season for him. Yes JaMarcus played well the last copule games of the season but what has he done to make himself better. When Cable has to publicly challenge JaMarcus to step up and become a leader. How does JaMarcus respond? He sets up private practice’s to try to get himself and the recievers on the same page and then skips on the last day. This has left some people really questioning his work ethic. Alot can happen between now and the start of the season so I won’t give up on him yet but we are running out of excuses for him. I say if he can’t get it done within the first couple of games than it’s time to hand the reins over to Garcia.

by Raider76 on Jul 6, 2009 10:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Make him work for it!

I cringe when I hear the label of bust placed on Jamarcus. Put any QB into the Raiders offense last year and they would struggle. That being said Russell’s complacency and sense of entitlement make me question his future much more than the shaking his seemingly endless reservoir of confidence. If it takes Jamarcus losing his job to an old white dude with a water pistol for an arm to light the fire inside him- then I am all for it.

I have seen the complaint that benching Russell would cost him valuable game time and set his development back, but if he is not truly striving to better himself then what is he gaining. Whatever makes him hungry to make this team, his team, is what is best for the Raiders.

The offensive skill position players are young and they need an on field leader that demands accountability. effort and attention to detail and I hope this is Russell. He has said the right things this off season and then missed the last day of ota’s so it is hard to tell where his head is.

Here’s to hoping he keeps his word and puts in the extra practice with the wr’s, if not give me Garcia while hoping it drives Jamarcus to pull his head out.

Wherever I go, that's where I am.

by noontide on Jul 7, 2009 1:39 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm

We seem to be going over the same arguments over and over again. We should approach this from a new angle. Those of you dissatisfied with Russell, maybe you could give us some concrete ideas of what you expected out of Russell last year, and I mean stats, not just gut feelings, ie “He’s stupid. He’s lazy. He’s all about the bling.” I mean, what kind of actual numbers did you expect?

See, if you can do that, then we look at the big picture. Because if we’re really going to debate this, we seriously do need to factor in all the different parts of the passing game. Otherwise there’s no point. I mentioned the lack of pass protection earlier, and nobody had any response to that, but you’d better if you expect him to play better.

And hey, for my own part, I will say he did have a lot of fumbles. True the o-line gave up a lot of sacks, but he does need to hang on to the football better or throw it away sooner.

by rightnasty on Jul 7, 2009 2:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Other people unhappy with their quarterback

ttp://www.hogshaven.com/2009/6/24/923852/am-i-the-only-skins-fan-that-wants

by rightnasty on Jul 9, 2009 10:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Woooo

Another 100 comment page

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 11, 2009 6:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Amazing how a thread about Russell blows up like this. I wonder if somebody does a post on the O-Line or the defense’s failings in stopping the run would it draw this much interest.

by rightnasty on Jul 11, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

true. but let's be honest.

there’s no controversy in the Oline or the defense’s failing in stopping the run. If the raiders don’t sign Garcia, there is no discussion.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 11, 2009 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think right now

O-Line is solid, D-Line is shaky, and Jamarcus is in between the two.

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 11, 2009 8:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i think the Dline looks pretty good this year

but thats just me…

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 11, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It really

Depends on Tommy Kelly and Sands if he is there. I know we will get alot out of Greg Ellis and Burgess.

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Jul 11, 2009 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope you're right about the O-line

But cobbling something together from other teams’ castoffs doesn’t give me a lot of confidence. Especially when they absolutely must establish the running game this year.

by rightnasty on Jul 13, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

only Barnes is a castoff

the Raiders traded for Satele (does that count as a castoff), have Carlisle and Gallery as guards. and Henderson, whom they’ve developed from within as the LT. 1 out of 5 is not bad and the ZBS is designed to make castoffs and underachievers successful, right?

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 13, 2009 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Raiders.
Start posting about the Raiders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
I'm actually surprised to see this.
Dock_small
Black Sunday: Tom Cable's Infinite Wisdom and JaMarcus Russell's Best Quality

Recent FanPosts

Dock_small
Raiders vs. B-Y-E: An Epic Battle For The Ages
Light_up_the_halo_1600x1200_small
Chiefs vs. Raiders
Dock_small
Innocent Until Proven Guilty: Tom Cable is the Victim
Small
Using Creativeness To Find The Next Coach
Cassius_clay_small
Dwaine Board
Ice_cube_raiders-1_small
R.I.P. Ray Ray Russell
Small
Few Quick Stats on the Season's First Half
Small
Return of Duh Vuhtical Game
Small
Chargers Release Chris Chambers!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Big Cat Country
Jaguars-Chiefs Video Preview
Mocking The Draft
Saturday NFL Draft watch notes
Cincy Jungle
Final Practice/Injury Report: Baltimore Ravens (4-3) at Cincinnati Bengals (5-2)

SPONSORS


Editors

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Jamarcus_small LiveAdam

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Authors

V_face_small KA1Z3R