Silver And Black Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Weekly Raider Issue #6

 


It's mid-July and the weather is great, well at least it is where I'm at. As training camp draws nearer, the wait seems longer. Here to ease the wait, we bring you the sixth issue of the Weekly Raider. As always, I strive to bring you the finest in Raiders reading and hope you enjoy.

Star-divide

 

-Weekly Raider: #9 Shane Lechler, Punter-

3rdqtr005_medium

 

via www.raiders.com

 

The player we want to see come on to the field the least, is actually one of Oakland's best players and the best at his position. For years Shane Lechler has been pinning teams deep in the territory to start long drives. And he's done so very consistently.

 

On a team full of inconsistency, Lechler and Nnamdi have been the only sources of consistency. Lechler continuously works on and perfects his craft, even though he doesn't show it in voluntary workouts. Capable of rocketing the ball way down the field and doing so with pin-point precision, Lechler has even been regarded has possibly one of the greatest punters of all-time. I'd even put him in that group. After all, he's been the best punter of the decade. If you don't believe me, look at career statistics:

 

2000: 65 punts for 2984 yards. averaged 45.9 yards per punt. 24 punts inside the 20. 38.0 net average

2001: 73 punts for 3375 yards. averaged 46.2 yards per punt. 23 punts inside the 20. 35.6 net average

2002: 53 punts for 2251 yards. averaged 42.5 yards per punt. 18 punts inside the 20. 32.7 net average

2003: 96 punts for 4503 yards. averaged 46.9 yards per punt. 27 punts inside the 20. 37.2 net average

2004: 73 punts for 3409 yards. averaged 46.7 yards per punt. 22 punts inside the 20. 37.2 net average

2005: 82 punts for 3744 yards. averaged 45.7 yards per punt. 26 punts inside the 20. 37.9 net average

2006: 77 punts for 3660 yards. averaged 47.5 yards per punt. 19 punts inside the 20. 36.4 net average

2007: 73 punts for 3585 yards. averaged 49.1 yards per punt. 25 punts inside the 20. 41.1 net average

2008: 90 punts for 4391 yards. averaged 48.8 yards per punt. 33 punts inside the 20. 41.2 net average

 

As you can see, every year of his career except 2002, he's averaged near 50 yards per punt. Also worth noting that every year of his career he's had at least 1 punt go over 64 yards (career longest is 73 yards in 2003).

 

Some notes on Lechler's career: had at least one punt of 50 or more yards in 33 consecutive games from Week 13 of 2003 to Week 14 of 2005, holds NFL record for best average per punt with 46.5 (former record holder Sammy Baugh averaged 45.1), and he has the second most punt yards in Raider history with 31,902 yards (Ray Guy has 44,493)

 

My expectations for Lechler, consistency. Look for a 48.5 yards or higher per punt year. I look for him to get about 26 punts inside the 20. The special teams are getting better and will keep those returners from getting very far.

 

-Random Thoughts: The Defensive Tackles-

 

If you check the comments, I believe on the Weekly Raiders Issue #5 post, you'll see I came down hard on the Raiders defensive tackles. I called them the worst group in the league, which they are, but I'd like to go more in-depth.

 

Realistically, Warren and Kelly are the only quality players at the spot. Not good since DT is a very demanding and tiring job, especially when you're getting ran at all game. There's nobody that can go in there and fill in for either of those two while they're taking a breather and be half-way decent.

 

Sands is a massive DT and has the build of what should be a good NT in a 4-3. Instead he just takes up space as he's so easily outmatched by the opposing offesnive line. Last year we saw a slight improvement but he clearly doesn't care enough to try. I think this year is definitely his last unless he breaks out and becomes a force in the run game. Which is very unlikely.

Joseph is an interesting case in that he came in last year, was released before the start of the season, brought back in mid-season, released after the season, then brought back in again. Joseph is okay at best. I'm hesitant to say he's bad, but he could be much better. Like Sands, he's not really motivated. Joesph basically is a smaller Sands at a much cheaper price. As a rotation guy, I like him. But if someone amongst our aging DT's gets injured, I don't want him as a backup.

Honestly, I don't know really anything about Boschetti. I know he was undrafted and hung around with Washington for a couple years, but that's about it. Being the same size as Joesph, I'd hope he can play in the same manner. With 6 DT's on the current roster, one of Joesph and Boschetti will be released. Since Joesph has seen more action and done better in that action, I think he'll be staying.

Then there's the Havard DT Desmond Bryant. I expect him to make practice squad and be groomed to either a pass rushing specialist at DT, or a big DE.

Let's take a  look back at the starters of Warren and Kelly. Warren has been the best DT on roster since joining Oakland in 07. He's recorded 4 sacks each year and has been decent in the running game. Despite that 330 lb. frame, Warren is more of a pass rushing UT at this point in his career. If he can work on his abilities in the running game and get them more fine-tuned, he could be a good DT in the NFL. But even if he doesn't, he's still the best DT the Raiders have for now.

Kelly is sort of in the same boat. A good pass rushing DT (4.5 sacks last year) who was the thought to be a run-stopping DT. Though he did have some kind of surgery on his knees before last year. This year should be when we get to see what Kelly's really got. I'd expect him to be much more formidable in the running game while still keeping that pass rush. If anything, I'm hoping he'll be a base DT who can play the run and pass to an equal degree so that Oakland won't have two UT's up there at the line.

 

Who knows, maybe with some development and discipline, these aging vets might be able to step it up and prove me wrong. Or maybe the occasional blitz (which should be what Marshall provides scheme-wise) will let them get that extra push they need in the run game.

 

-Featured Fan TheRaiderWay-

 

Random image:

2838503517_0a192c8886_medium

via i32.photobucket.com


Poll
Next Weekly Raider (offense only no rookies)
Russell
206 votes
Fargas
91 votes
Neal
73 votes
Miller
189 votes
Higgins
151 votes
Gallery
84 votes
other (please specify)
16 votes

810 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

poll was screwed up but fixed now

hoping for Miller but I predict Russell in a landslide.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 14, 2009 7:49 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope Zach Miller wins the poll. He’s the best offensive player on the team.

The defensive tackles are probably the worst in the league and probably the position we’re looking to target in the 2010 draft with our first-round pick, which is hopefully not inside the top 10 this year.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 14, 2009 12:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

look for DT and LB to be our top two needs

as that’s pretty much what they are now.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 14, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how come no rookies

Stop.......... Hammertime!!!!!

by MR. Bigshot 123 on Jul 14, 2009 2:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We’ve talked enough about ’em for now.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 14, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

plus

I don’t have as many resources to work with to evaluate them since nearly every college site has taken them off and all the draft sites are starting to get cleared off. Also, they’re rookies and extremely hard to predict and harder to judge their pro abilities based on their collegiate abilities.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

draft

linebacker would only be a need if we lost thomas howard or kirk to FA next year. if not then its DT and prolly saftey.

by frank7da2tank on Jul 15, 2009 12:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

what about strongside LB?

Brown isn’t exactly good, Alston is showing promise but it’s only OTA’s, and Williams is a good pass rusher but isn’t big enough or strong enough to take down RB on the strong side.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its definitely a need

but i think the Raiders have bigger needs elsewhere.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 15, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

true dat

I think the raiders should also consider looking for a G. Carlisle isn’t getting any younger and the time for our future RG is next year or the year after.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya or safety

or RT. we basically have stop gaps there. Carlisle can probly hold that RG spot for hopefully 2 more years. good thing Guards is something that can be filled in the midrounds of the draft…

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 15, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

RT may not be a need

If Barnes impresses at the spot, and if not, if Pears might show some starter quality ability like he did in Denver.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hopefully

but they both strike me as stop-gap players that can competently hold the spot down until a longterm solution comes.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Jul 15, 2009 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

guard

can also be found in FA too so im not to worried about that spot. RT i think we"re good on that spot personaly. like ka1z3r said all those guys have the potential to blow up. i really think either DT or saftey. if mario doesnt pan out than maybe a left tackle?? we’ll know by a few weeks in the season

by frank7da2tank on Jul 17, 2009 1:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

my only problem with safety going into next year

that would be three safeties in three years. Mitchell and Branch have a lot of potential.

Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God

by KA1Z3R on Jul 17, 2009 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Show time for the Raiders

     Everyone is right about the need for improved play at every position, DT especially in run D, Safety play especially in run D, Defense especially in run D, do you see where I am going, I have to believe that run D is going to be a real focus because we defense the pass fairly well. Now the question is do we have the talent to be an overall dominant Defense, I believe we do, however, the key will be do our guys believe it, can they put that persistent effort in to really be the best. Our coaching must provide schemes and actually coach players to be effective. Being a winner has as much to do with attitude as it does with ability.

    Offensively is no different, you guys in this blog are very knowledgeable and every subject is met with intelligence and shows you guys know the Raiders, now we need to get the players to read it lol…..I love the Raiders, I was born a Raider, being born and raised in Oakland. Now they have to man up, if you are the same height, speed, have the same strength and other measureables as the guy in front of you why do you get whipped if you have solid fundamentals, you get whipped because of attitude, its mental, and the Raiders as a team must get over that and start kicking butt and taking names.

     If you want to win then win, This is a mans game, man to man, the best man wins, Raiders have always played with this mentality and we need to get back to it, we have the players, now we need the attitude, focus, and execution.

by Rodney Sacramento on Jul 18, 2009 5:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.
Start posting about the Raiders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Edge_small
Official 2010 NFL Offseason Thread
Raiders_small
Oakland Must Resign Thomas And Kirk
Images_small
JaMarcus is not noticeably slimmer
Small
Start @ the Top
Small
Restructure Russell's Contract NOW!! Go after T.O.
Me_as_a_simpson_small
Represent Your Team in MHR's Live Mock!
Small
Shawn Andrew's released by the Eagles.. get our your checkbook Al quick!
Small
DT Suh at 8?!!
Ronniebrownjuke_small
Franchise Players
228657055_002c620ad1_small
Kiffin is running for Sexiest woman alive

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo +1 updates

Rams, Redskins Showing Interest In QB Sam Bradford

Photo +1 updates

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

More from SBNation.com >


Captain

Raymond_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

Chiefs

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Jamarcus_small LiveAdam

Crew

Sunkist_small KA1Z3R

Edge_small Rated-R Superstar

Dock_small noontide

Shareddesignimage_small B.A.Armstrong

Habemus_papum_small Sons-of-Blanda