Weekly Raider Issue #6
-Weekly Raider: #9 Shane Lechler, Punter-
via www.raiders.com
The player we want to see come on to the field the least, is actually one of Oakland's best players and the best at his position. For years Shane Lechler has been pinning teams deep in the territory to start long drives. And he's done so very consistently.
On a team full of inconsistency, Lechler and Nnamdi have been the only sources of consistency. Lechler continuously works on and perfects his craft, even though he doesn't show it in voluntary workouts. Capable of rocketing the ball way down the field and doing so with pin-point precision, Lechler has even been regarded has possibly one of the greatest punters of all-time. I'd even put him in that group. After all, he's been the best punter of the decade. If you don't believe me, look at career statistics:
2000: 65 punts for 2984 yards. averaged 45.9 yards per punt. 24 punts inside the 20. 38.0 net average
2001: 73 punts for 3375 yards. averaged 46.2 yards per punt. 23 punts inside the 20. 35.6 net average
2002: 53 punts for 2251 yards. averaged 42.5 yards per punt. 18 punts inside the 20. 32.7 net average
2003: 96 punts for 4503 yards. averaged 46.9 yards per punt. 27 punts inside the 20. 37.2 net average
2004: 73 punts for 3409 yards. averaged 46.7 yards per punt. 22 punts inside the 20. 37.2 net average
2005: 82 punts for 3744 yards. averaged 45.7 yards per punt. 26 punts inside the 20. 37.9 net average
2006: 77 punts for 3660 yards. averaged 47.5 yards per punt. 19 punts inside the 20. 36.4 net average
2007: 73 punts for 3585 yards. averaged 49.1 yards per punt. 25 punts inside the 20. 41.1 net average
2008: 90 punts for 4391 yards. averaged 48.8 yards per punt. 33 punts inside the 20. 41.2 net average
As you can see, every year of his career except 2002, he's averaged near 50 yards per punt. Also worth noting that every year of his career he's had at least 1 punt go over 64 yards (career longest is 73 yards in 2003).
Some notes on Lechler's career: had at least one punt of 50 or more yards in 33 consecutive games from Week 13 of 2003 to Week 14 of 2005, holds NFL record for best average per punt with 46.5 (former record holder Sammy Baugh averaged 45.1), and he has the second most punt yards in Raider history with 31,902 yards (Ray Guy has 44,493)
My expectations for Lechler, consistency. Look for a 48.5 yards or higher per punt year. I look for him to get about 26 punts inside the 20. The special teams are getting better and will keep those returners from getting very far.
-Random Thoughts: The Defensive Tackles-
If you check the comments, I believe on the Weekly Raiders Issue #5 post, you'll see I came down hard on the Raiders defensive tackles. I called them the worst group in the league, which they are, but I'd like to go more in-depth.
Realistically, Warren and Kelly are the only quality players at the spot. Not good since DT is a very demanding and tiring job, especially when you're getting ran at all game. There's nobody that can go in there and fill in for either of those two while they're taking a breather and be half-way decent.
Sands is a massive DT and has the build of what should be a good NT in a 4-3. Instead he just takes up space as he's so easily outmatched by the opposing offesnive line. Last year we saw a slight improvement but he clearly doesn't care enough to try. I think this year is definitely his last unless he breaks out and becomes a force in the run game. Which is very unlikely.
Joseph is an interesting case in that he came in last year, was released before the start of the season, brought back in mid-season, released after the season, then brought back in again. Joseph is okay at best. I'm hesitant to say he's bad, but he could be much better. Like Sands, he's not really motivated. Joesph basically is a smaller Sands at a much cheaper price. As a rotation guy, I like him. But if someone amongst our aging DT's gets injured, I don't want him as a backup.
Honestly, I don't know really anything about Boschetti. I know he was undrafted and hung around with Washington for a couple years, but that's about it. Being the same size as Joesph, I'd hope he can play in the same manner. With 6 DT's on the current roster, one of Joesph and Boschetti will be released. Since Joesph has seen more action and done better in that action, I think he'll be staying.
Then there's the Havard DT Desmond Bryant. I expect him to make practice squad and be groomed to either a pass rushing specialist at DT, or a big DE.
Let's take a look back at the starters of Warren and Kelly. Warren has been the best DT on roster since joining Oakland in 07. He's recorded 4 sacks each year and has been decent in the running game. Despite that 330 lb. frame, Warren is more of a pass rushing UT at this point in his career. If he can work on his abilities in the running game and get them more fine-tuned, he could be a good DT in the NFL. But even if he doesn't, he's still the best DT the Raiders have for now.
Kelly is sort of in the same boat. A good pass rushing DT (4.5 sacks last year) who was the thought to be a run-stopping DT. Though he did have some kind of surgery on his knees before last year. This year should be when we get to see what Kelly's really got. I'd expect him to be much more formidable in the running game while still keeping that pass rush. If anything, I'm hoping he'll be a base DT who can play the run and pass to an equal degree so that Oakland won't have two UT's up there at the line.
Who knows, maybe with some development and discipline, these aging vets might be able to step it up and prove me wrong. Or maybe the occasional blitz (which should be what Marshall provides scheme-wise) will let them get that extra push they need in the run game.
-Featured Fan TheRaiderWay-
Random image:
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
poll was screwed up but fixed now
hoping for Miller but I predict Russell in a landslide.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 14, 2009 7:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope Zach Miller wins the poll. He’s the best offensive player on the team.
The defensive tackles are probably the worst in the league and probably the position we’re looking to target in the 2010 draft with our first-round pick, which is hopefully not inside the top 10 this year.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 14, 2009 12:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
look for DT and LB to be our top two needs
as that’s pretty much what they are now.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 14, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
how come no rookies
Stop.......... Hammertime!!!!!
by MR. Bigshot 123 on Jul 14, 2009 2:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We’ve talked enough about ’em for now.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 14, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus
I don’t have as many resources to work with to evaluate them since nearly every college site has taken them off and all the draft sites are starting to get cleared off. Also, they’re rookies and extremely hard to predict and harder to judge their pro abilities based on their collegiate abilities.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
draft
linebacker would only be a need if we lost thomas howard or kirk to FA next year. if not then its DT and prolly saftey.
by frank7da2tank on Jul 15, 2009 12:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
what about strongside LB?
Brown isn’t exactly good, Alston is showing promise but it’s only OTA’s, and Williams is a good pass rusher but isn’t big enough or strong enough to take down RB on the strong side.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
its definitely a need
but i think the Raiders have bigger needs elsewhere.
Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!
by naq92 on Jul 15, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
true dat
I think the raiders should also consider looking for a G. Carlisle isn’t getting any younger and the time for our future RG is next year or the year after.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya or safety
or RT. we basically have stop gaps there. Carlisle can probly hold that RG spot for hopefully 2 more years. good thing Guards is something that can be filled in the midrounds of the draft…
Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!
by naq92 on Jul 15, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
RT may not be a need
If Barnes impresses at the spot, and if not, if Pears might show some starter quality ability like he did in Denver.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 15, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
guard
can also be found in FA too so im not to worried about that spot. RT i think we"re good on that spot personaly. like ka1z3r said all those guys have the potential to blow up. i really think either DT or saftey. if mario doesnt pan out than maybe a left tackle?? we’ll know by a few weeks in the season
by frank7da2tank on Jul 17, 2009 1:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
my only problem with safety going into next year
that would be three safeties in three years. Mitchell and Branch have a lot of potential.
Randy Blythe, Singer of Lamb of God- "Words can be broken, so can bones....." Omerta by Lamb of God
by KA1Z3R on Jul 17, 2009 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Show time for the Raiders
Everyone is right about the need for improved play at every position, DT especially in run D, Safety play especially in run D, Defense especially in run D, do you see where I am going, I have to believe that run D is going to be a real focus because we defense the pass fairly well. Now the question is do we have the talent to be an overall dominant Defense, I believe we do, however, the key will be do our guys believe it, can they put that persistent effort in to really be the best. Our coaching must provide schemes and actually coach players to be effective. Being a winner has as much to do with attitude as it does with ability.
Offensively is no different, you guys in this blog are very knowledgeable and every subject is met with intelligence and shows you guys know the Raiders, now we need to get the players to read it lol…..I love the Raiders, I was born a Raider, being born and raised in Oakland. Now they have to man up, if you are the same height, speed, have the same strength and other measureables as the guy in front of you why do you get whipped if you have solid fundamentals, you get whipped because of attitude, its mental, and the Raiders as a team must get over that and start kicking butt and taking names.
If you want to win then win, This is a mans game, man to man, the best man wins, Raiders have always played with this mentality and we need to get back to it, we have the players, now we need the attitude, focus, and execution.
by Rodney Sacramento on Jul 18, 2009 5:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























