Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Silver and Black Pride's Sunday Community Poll: Raiders Postgame Preseason Game 2

It is a well established fact in the NFL that teams use the first two games of the preseason as a diagnostic tool for evaluating as many players as possible from their 80 man rosters to start preparing for who will remain on the final 53. Then, on week three of the preseason, NFL teams play most of their starters for 3 quarters and they actually install a game plan for the offense and defense.

The 4th game is where many of the veteran starters rest and get ready for the regular season opener and teams play to avoid injuries and to make any final evaluations of the remaining "bubble" players before the final cut down. I bring this up because the first two preseason games for the Raiders, like the rest of the NFL, are more for "individual" evaluations not "unit" evaluations. NFL teams for those two games tend to play very straight, vanilla type offenses and defenses so that they can evaluate individual players without the complexities of a complicated game plan. When week three of the preseason comes around, then there will be some actual vision of "unit" play with some of the complexities of the typical regular season game planning involved.

So for the Raiders, this upcoming week 3 preseason game against the New Orleans Saints will serve as a better barometer for the quality and readiness of the team unit play in preparation of the regular season opener. We have to remember, for the reasons stated above, that this is the preseason and to not get too alarmed about how the "team" that is carrying 80 players is looking with their unit play. There will be many around here that will harp on the "unit's" run defense. There is some validity for the concern, but it is way too early to make a judgment there yet. If the Saints run all over the Raiders defense next week during the first 3 quarters, then we can start being concerned. I expect that the Raiders will install a sound game plan for the Saints game and will defense the run adequately enough to show progress in that unit's department.

With that being said, let's look at some of the positive and negative "individual" play from last night's game:

The good:

  • JaMarcus Russell: Nothing brilliant, but playing error free and showing marked improvement in his fundamentals is quite encouraging. His footwork was much better then last season at this time and his decision making is coming together, the Paul Hackett factor seems to be working.
  • Oren O'Neal: Just the fact that he is on the field after that serious knee injury is great news for the Raiders offense. His showing as a lead blocker and blitz protector will make the release of Lorenzo Neal more palatable.
  • Brandon Meyers: The rookie 6th round pick out of Iowa was supposed to be just a "blocking" tight end. Well, Meyers can catch the ball too and that's a big bonus for the Raiders. Meyers not only made the roster with last night's performance, (4 receptions/75 yards and a TD) he may well have locked himself in as the #2 tight end behind Zach Miller.
  • Louis Murphy: It's not just the TD that he got (really due to blown coverage), but his poise out there, not being intimidated and not looking like a rookie. He will advance quickly and somewhat soften the blow of Chaz Schilen's absence.
  • Ricky Brown: Brown played with high intensity and energy that had him all over the field. He was in and around just about every play, displaying great hustle and showing that he can be and wants to be a starter. With Morrison's injury, Brown will likely be the open night starter at MLB.

The not-so-good:

  • Cornell Green: Another red zone penalty from the right tackle. How many more of these costly penalties are we going to have to endure from Green. Hurry up and get back Khalif or step up Pears, otherwise this will be a long season with Green.
  • Nick Miller: He was probably trying too hard, but that 4th quarter fumble had to hurt his chances to make the team.
  • Kirk Morrison: dislocated elbow is not that serious, but Captain Kirk is needed on the field and now he won't be for a few weeks.
  • Injuries: Nnamdi, Rashad Baker, Mario Henderson and Fargas all with some minor injuries in addition to Morrison. God, I hate the preseason for this reason and for a team with as little quality depth as the Raiders have, every injury is meaningful.

Two "meaningless" preseason games in the books and the 3rd game approaching where we should see some signs of improved unit play. What are your post game thoughts Raider Nation?

Poll
What are you most concerned about for the Raiders after the first two preseason games?
JaMarcus Russell
122 votes
Right tackle
40 votes
Injuries
103 votes
The run defense
762 votes
The Tom Cable - Hanson situation
77 votes
No worries, it's only preseason
45 votes
Other (please specify in comments)
6 votes

1155 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

that run d

is atrocious.

We gave up over 100 yards to a rookie running back, and we’re coming off last week where Felix Jones had his way with our D too. This needs to be fixed/upgraded to terror alert red status.

"..what you mean? I'm a legend like Kareem!"

by CommittedToExcellence on Aug 23, 2009 7:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Who on Earth Voted For Russell over the Run Defense?

Russell: 13 for 20 for 126 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT in roughly 3 quarters of play. That translates into a QB rating of about 99.2. We can only hope for that kind of performance from Russell come the regular season. He has shown faster decision-making in his limited playing time, and will only get more opportunities to make an impact as the running game comes together and adds in play-action.

Run Defense: 402 yards allowed on 76 rushing attempts, translates to 5.3 yards per carry allowed. The Raiders defense just made Glen Coffee the preseason rushing leader in the span of 2 quarters. The entire front 7 of the defense looked awful stopping the run, with the defensive line getting pushed around and the linebackers in the wrong gaps and missing tackles.

Run defense has to be the bigger concern.

Slade Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

ESPN’s draft coverage missed the moment when Al Davis and Tom Cable each took turns using Mel Kiper’s mock draft as toilet paper. - Chris Shellcroft

by LiveAdam on Aug 23, 2009 10:34 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree

Russell is playin great. That Run D is scarin me

Trains , planes, and automoblies,.... better have my donuts!!!!

by dubzero23 on Aug 23, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Russell rated 114

The run D a big fail. The only reason it wasn’t worse was SF wanting to look at their QB’s

by dram5780 on Aug 23, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Russell QB Rating

114 for yesterday’s performance, 99.2 for the preseason so far. If he could be around 90 all year I think we’d be very pleased.

Slade Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

ESPN’s draft coverage missed the moment when Al Davis and Tom Cable each took turns using Mel Kiper’s mock draft as toilet paper. - Chris Shellcroft

by LiveAdam on Aug 23, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who on Earth Voted For Russell over the Run Defense?

Trolls.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Aug 23, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Other than one break out up the middle

the real problems was and still is the LB’s. They are not filling the gaps and also not making the tackles when they have a chance. It is a major concern. I think the tackle play is fine, it is the DE’s and the LB’s, totally inadequate, and Howard is a major culprit.
Cable thinks they can fix it, I am not so sure. I thought Branch looked good coming up and tackling, no one else even showed up on the radar.

by Laoren on Aug 23, 2009 10:43 AM PDT reply actions  

I did not see the game.

How did DHB get shut out of the stat line? I see there is no mention of him looking like a complete lame ass so he must not of done anything horrible, but what the hell, they couldn’t find a way to get him the ball once?

Wherever I go, that's where I am.

by Rich Langford on Aug 23, 2009 11:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Only targeted once

DHB got double-covered while he was in, only got targeted once, and it ended up being Russell’s worst throw of the night, sailing wide right. Of Russell’s 7 completions, only 1 went to a WR – Murphy’s TD catch.

Slade Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

ESPN’s draft coverage missed the moment when Al Davis and Tom Cable each took turns using Mel Kiper’s mock draft as toilet paper. - Chris Shellcroft

by LiveAdam on Aug 23, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I' m not so sure if you are talking

about the first pass of the night on the sideline. I know Russell was criticized for that, but he threw to the sideline marker and DHB was a good 5 yds. further up the field so the question is did Russell make a bad throw or did DHB run the route deeper than he was supposed to. I know that the QB always gets blamed if the throw is not on the receiver but sometimes the receivers run the wrong routes and makes the QB look bad. I didn’t get a good look at the ball thrown later downfield that was broken up, not sure if the throw was on target and the DB just made a nice play.

by Laoren on Aug 23, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure about the first one

I didn’t see a replay, but DHB looked pretty close to the marker to me on the first one. I guess I missed the second time Russell targeted DHB.

Slade Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

ESPN’s draft coverage missed the moment when Al Davis and Tom Cable each took turns using Mel Kiper’s mock draft as toilet paper. - Chris Shellcroft

by LiveAdam on Aug 23, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing I love better than seeing miopic Whiner fans talking about how the end score indicates they are the better team.

It just goes to show you how stupid that side of the bay is.

For a world class city, you have a high percentage of Sports Tards out there.

Fix our run D and we are good with a whole lot else!

Green and Gold Lantern Corps

by oaklandSMASH on Aug 23, 2009 1:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Well, they should feel like they have the better team.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Aug 23, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Run Offense

disappointed also. WE didn’t run very efficiently

R.I.P - Michael Jackson

by Rayder K on Aug 23, 2009 4:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Cable has openly stated that the pre-season

will be devoted to working on the passing game. There has really been no attempt to run the ball, I promise you that when the season starts McFadden will not be asked to run inside the tackles and Fargas will not get the ball when the Raiders are on the opponents 3 yd. line. Cable has made it very clear that if the Raiders don’t improve their passing game dramatically then they cannot win. He has also made it clear that the Raiders will be able to run the ball, in both I agree. I don’t want one of the runners to get injured in the pre-season, for what reason? Don’t worry about the run offense, worry about the run defense.

by Laoren on Aug 23, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

i thought that was because

we basically know we already have a pretty legit running game. I think when Cable emphasized the pass, he was trying to get Russell to develop, not putting the running game on the backburner…

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Aug 25, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Run D was not that Bad!!

Did I not watch the same game you all watched. I saw a good D in the 1st qtr. Our run D was horrible when we started to play our 2nd and 3rd stringers. I left the game with a positive feeling for this years Raidahs. We looked good fellow Black/Hole’ers. Silver and Black forever

by RaiderDave on Aug 23, 2009 4:51 PM PDT reply actions  

We did a good job defending runs up the middle

But even when we had the starters in there I don’t remember good run D on anything outside the tackles. From memory, didn’t we stop them on passing downs? Otherwise I think they were still having success running on us.

@worldblee on Twitter.

by worldblee on Aug 23, 2009 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

WE were not able to cover runs as they hit the outside

R.I.P - Michael Jackson

by Rayder K on Aug 23, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wish I'd seen the game you saw.

What channel was that game on? The channel I watched showed us getting manhandled on the line. Coffee ran for over a 100 yards on 8 plays against our first team. And he’s not even their starter! At least the 2nd and 3rd teams kept him to under 30 on the same number of plays.

It’s not just the players fault. SF kept running the same play over and over and we could not or would not adjust. Isn’t that why Ryan got the boot? And it should have been worse except for the fact that SF coaches wanted to look at QB’s. Ugly. LT and LJ are gonna kill us.

by dram5780 on Aug 23, 2009 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, we did not get manhandled on the line

We got overmatched on the outside, and that is a DE and LB issue, the same issue we have had for a few years now. The LB’s are not filling the hole and when they do they are not tackling, another issue from the past few years. The DE’s have to contain, and the LB’s have to fill and bring guys down.
Unless this gets taken care of within a few weeks there are going to be some teams running at will.

by Laoren on Aug 23, 2009 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting Choice of Words for Cable re: Run Defense

Per David White’s latest article:

“I think you have to at some point set your jaw and decide you’re not going to get your rear end kicked like that.”

Cable must not have a lawyer or publicist yet, because they would certainly have advised him against using a word like “jaw” in just about any context right now. Gave me a chuckle though.

If Jay Richardson was right and this is truly Al Davis’ defense, then a quick message to Al Davis: “Your run defense sucks!”

Slade Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise.

ESPN’s draft coverage missed the moment when Al Davis and Tom Cable each took turns using Mel Kiper’s mock draft as toilet paper. - Chris Shellcroft

by LiveAdam on Aug 23, 2009 8:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Drama queen

at the risk of sounding like a dq, I’m concerned not with just he talent on our run D but our state of mind. When you look at superlative run Ds, ie, Ravens, etc, they have a gang tackling mentality where they swarm and fly to the ball. So far in preseason, it’s one on ones, missed tackle, not adjusting to O-line pulling, etc. I don’t see a unit flying to the ball regardless of formation. It’s the state of mind that I question.
Regarding JR, his go to guy was clearly Chaz.. Young QBs need comfort and we’re asking two rookies to fill that role. Unless we’re able to run the ball, will he be in a position to succeed?

by raiders4liffe on Aug 24, 2009 4:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Run Defense

Switch to the 3-4 already, and run the zone blitz. End of problems, period. Should be a blitz on every play. No more 4-2 defense. It does not work. Itopnlyputs players out of position. 3-4 3-4 3-4!!!

by Al-dair Ven Kahn on Aug 24, 2009 12:26 PM PDT reply actions  

The Raiders will be fine, this is what preseason is for

First forget the win or lose on this, if we were in a regular season game we tie with the extra point and go from there. Next we all know our run defense is a work in progress, we controlled the middle and lost the outside, well if it ain’t one thing its another. I think we will be fine, a fumble, some sloppy plays, but all in all I think we are far better than last season at this point.

There will be plenty of work in the areas we are weak in and I commend Coach for his attitude right now, it will get worked out our new D Coordinator has to get his system completely in place, remember we have a new DC, so it will take a little time to get it together.

Raider Dave hit it on the nose, our second and third units lost a lot of ground, but all in all for a preseason game it did what it was suppose to. Don’t panic yet, its too early, we have made strides over last year so far and Denver and KC have lost ground.

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 24, 2009 2:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Penalties

Still bad, but the penalties were cut in half from the Dallas game. Maybe the ballet lessons of the first four days of practice is paying off. I hope so. Green needs to focus.

by origraid on Aug 24, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions  

haha ya...

green needs to focus, and…you know, not suck.

Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!!

by naq92 on Aug 25, 2009 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

WHAT WRONG???

The defensive line is definitely a “major” problem…But it doesnt stop there…….This team cannot score in the RED-ZONE.. I think its play calling. Bad decisions have kept the RAIDERS out of the end-zone. I think the RAIDIERS have some talent out there, but the coaching is terrible…. I also think if you draft a guy in the first round, you might want to get him involved in the game. BEY doesnt get enough passes during a game. He is only going to get better if you pass him the ball.. And finally, they have excellent running backs, so why and the hell dont you run the ball!!!! I have been a RAIDER fan for 30yrs, and i am totally “disgusted” with the RAIDER MANAGEMENT!!!

by tsal44 on Aug 24, 2009 4:42 PM PDT reply actions  

come on raiders. i’m rooting for you this year. get back to prominence

by chaucer on Aug 24, 2009 9:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Defense is a work in progress, new D Coordinator, lack luster past season

We as a team are trying to get our defense where it needs to be, we are making progress, but it will take time and tweeking. With the new blitz packages, and other schemes it will be ok, our guys just need to get up to speed. It is good those weaknesses were exposed, that way we can work on them now and not when it counts.

This is what the preseason is for, to see weaknesses and work on correcting them to make them strengths. I am happy at the improvement so far, because it is improvement not the same old thing, we are progressing and during the preseason you want to see that. So good, they got run on, now we can work on correcting the why so it is not commonplace.

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 25, 2009 6:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Feel the Passion

Well, as a life long Raider Fan who goes back before the Al Davis and Madden Days. I say this is going to be another long losing season. We are not good in the trenches. We can’t block nor can we stop anyone from running the ball. It doesn’t matter who QB’s this team. We are going to lose and we are going to lose huge. We have many talented players in the skill positions. The jury is still out on JR, but I haven’t seen any glimpse of leadership and the ablility to make something happen. We have those qualities in Garcia though. We still are not disciplined enough to avoid penalties and somtimes maybe not good enough not to commit them, IE HOLDING. Unfortunatley, we have been in a state of diseray for many years now and I don’t see an end to it anytime soon. We can’t keep a coach long enough to get any continunity and sustained direction. I am old enough to have watched all 5 superbowls, The QB’s were LaMonica, Stabler, Plunket, Plunket and Gannon. I am also an Eagles fan since I live in Philly, But when the Raiders and Eagles played, I was the only one in the house rooting for the Raiders, I was dressed in Silver and Back and when Kenny King caught that sideline pass with an unbelivable catch and sprint down the sidlines for that TD, it was just great. When I think of the Raiders being good in the past, I thnk of that play and when Jack Squirek picked off Theisman for a TD just before halftime in that 38-9 masacre. That was the game Marcus Allen had that spectacular TD run. Yes, I’ve watch every Raider game that I could being from the East Coast. I would say the Raiders downturn started after Flores left. Eventhough we made it to the superbowl in 2003 I didn’t think were were that good, just better than everyone else in the AFC. Tampa Bay showed us we weren’t. I know I rambled on here a bit but I have to remember the good times to put up with the times we have and will face. I want Al Davis to be the owner, I just wish he’d hire good people and let them manage the team. Once he does this or retires, we will be able to compete with the rest of the teams. Just so you know, We went from being the most winningest franchise in sports history to having the worst record in the NFL over the last 5 years. That’s pretty bad, it’s not the players, it’s how the team is managed or not managed and it has actually been embarassing for Raider Fans, believe me I know, I’m one of them. In 5 years we’ve won a pethetic 19 games and lost 61, do you know how bad that is ? The Lions who didn’t even win a single game last year won 26. That’s 26 in 4 years and we had 19 in 5. The 2nd worst record in that time frame belongs to the 49’ers who won 25 games, 6 more than us, and we’ve been playing a last place schedule. I don’t know what some of you have been watching these last five years but I have seen us get slapped around by every team we’ve played. I have read posts here that suggest we’ll be fine, this is only pre season. I seen posts saying that our run defense is that bad. It’s worse than bad and it’s been worse than bad for 5 years and this is going to be the 6th whether you choose to believe it or not. I saw a post saying this is our year. Anyone who believes that has rocks for brains. I hope to see some improvement this year but if this coach is not the coach for the next 5 years you can forget about getting better any time soon. It don’t matter to me about winning the Superbowl, I want the team to be consistently competitive and try to improve every year. If we do that the wins and loses will take care of themselves and so will being in the Superbowl. I am not just a Rah Rah lets go Raiders Fan, I’m a real Fan and know that our team hasn’t been good and hasn’t gotten any better than last year.If we win 6 games we’ll be lucky. I know Raiders Football and it has always been about attitude and I haven’t seen any attitude for a long time. We’ve been playing like a bunch of wussies. I want that to change this year. I want us to fight, not lay down. At least we have a coach that willing to fight and that’s a start. How many of you know that Tom Flores was the First QB the Raiders ever had ? That’s right, in 1960 when the Raiders joined the AFL Flores was our QB, I may be the only one here that actually seen him play. Al Davis didn’t join the Raiders until 1963. My worst memory as a Raiders Fan is the Immaculate Reception, When I see the replay of it, it still sickens me. Most of the time I just change the channel because I just can’t stand to see it or hear that Voice that say" It’s caught out of the air" god I hate that voice and everything about that game. Sometimes I watch it and hope Franco get pushed out of bounds before crossing the goal line butthat never happens. So I live with it, that nightmare that just never seems to go away, there always seems to be a show that brings back that dreaded memory. But hey, I have many memories of the Raiders that have brought both Joy and Pain and wouldn’t trade them for anything. Remember when Davis moved the Raiders to LA ? That was all about Financial gain for Davis. That stadium held over 100,000 fans but the fans were so far away from the field you needed binoculars from the first row. When watching a game on TV, the place looked empty. Although we won a superbowl as the LA Riaders I didn’t like that move Davis made and it kind of made me not like him as much as I once did. I was happy when they moved back to Oakland, that meant all my Oakland Raider stuff was meaningful again lol, no, I just liked the Oakland Raiders, I mean I’ve been a fan since the Beginning. About this year, It’s going to be like last year, I’ll be surprised if we win 6 games. I just want to see improvement, not just in record but in playing the game. I want to see the old Raider attitude. It not all about the players it’s all about attitude. I want to see a swarming defensive that punnishes people like we used to, I want to see creativity in both our offensive and defensive coordinators which we haven’t had and is one of the reasons we’ve been so bad.. OK, I’m done LOL

by klngofspades on Aug 26, 2009 1:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Kingofspades I appreciate your post

I have been a Raider fan since I have known what football is, my dad took me to Raider games when they played at Laney College, I also saw the Raiders play in San Francisco at Kesar Stadium. I don’t remember Tom Flores as a player, too young, though I was at the games just too young to know the players, my understanding came with Daryl Lamonica, Clem Daniels, Hewitt Dixon, Charlie Smith is from my neighborhood and we are friends to this date. I started playing football for the Oakland Dynamites Pop Warner team then on to Berkeley High School where I wore Jack Tatums number and did all I could to hit like him, and to college to do the same thing. As you I have a lifelong love for the Raiders and I know the history, I watched every Super Bowl as well, and remember where I was when I saw us get that game stolen from us by Franco Harris. I was pissed when the Raiders went to LA and that was the Oakland Raiders that won that Super Bowl, not LA Raiders, that was the Oakland Roster, the LA Raider roster never went to the Super Bowl.

As a football player I look for certain things especially in training camp. I know the Raiders have been really bad, they are indeed better, and KC and Denver are considerably worse. The problem with J-Russ is he has to do it on his own, the Raiders did have someone that could put J-Russ under his wing and Garcia is a joke, he is 39 injury prone and watch what I tell you here, he will not be a game changer for the Raiders. I would cut him and keep both Gradski and Frye. Regardless of his past, he is coming in not so the Raiders win, not to help build for the future, not to help J-Russ, he is only there for himself. We need to get through the next couple of PS games and you will see the improvement in the first team. The injury to C-Chill will hurt because he had emerged as the clear number one receiver, so that was a set back, but our running game is ok, and we do need line work but so do many other teams in this division.

 So, I try to be realistic about it, the Raiders if they play to their potential this year will have decent season. But they will need to play their best every game, unlike the old days the Raiders could have a terrible game but they would still win..lol Thanks for the post many of our really young guys don’t know the Raider history.

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 27, 2009 4:35 AM PDT reply actions  

To Rodney in Sacremento

I also appreciate your post, I like to hear what a Real Raiders Fan has to say. A Fan that goes way back and knows their History. Not just a rah rah we are the best posters. We probably have jerseys older than they are. I know I do. My Marcus Allen Jersey is 30 years old and my Jim Otto Jersey is way older than that and still looks like new. No one player can make or break a team otherwise it’s not a team. We would have won those Superbowls no matter who was at QB or Who was the RB or WR. That’s because were were a good team with atttude. A winning attitude and that comes from the coach and what’s inside they players. I don’t think Garcia is a joke, he has the attitude, I’ve seen it in San Fran and seen it in Philly when McNabb got hurt. He brought them to the Championship game because he makes things happen. Playing to your potential has everything to do with preparation and being motivated along with your talent. Our players have not been prepared or motivated for a long time and that has everything to do with coaching and teaching. We had great teachers in Madden and Flores and even Shannahan but we fired him because AL didn’t like him. I wonder why he hired him in the first place. I wonder why he hired any of the last few coaches. It seems he just wants to hire puppets so he can manage the team on and off the field and if he can’t he fires people. Lane Kiffen is a good coach and he has attitude, I mean he hires him and then fires him because Lane wanted to do things his way. It’s certainly better than doing things Al’s way. It’s hard for players to be focused when you have all this crap going on and on and on and on. Teams need stability and we certainly don’t have that and haven’t had it for many years. The Steelers have Stability, so do the Patriots, Colts, Eagles,Titans and Giants to name a few. They have head coaches that have been there for years who have developed and sustained direction. Those teams have a plan. Teams don’t get good by accident and they certainly can’t stay good by accident. It takes the whole organization working together to achieve success, Including the owner. You certainly can’t get good by firing coaches every year and creating distractions. It takes way more than good players to succeed, every team has good players. It takes the whole organization that has a plan and works together to achieve their goal. Well, I don’t think Al Davis has a plan, He wants to win yes, but he doesn’t do what he has to do to get the job done. First you have to have a plan, then you have to get that plan into action. We are a team without a plan or direction which is why we are in the mess we’ve been in and this is why we can’t get any better. Al Davis is not committed to Excellence so how can the Raiders be excellent ? 19 wins in the last 5 years, that’s less than 4 wins a year. I don’t see any excellence in that. To think we are going to be any better this year under the circumstances in which this organization is in is a joke. Lets not confuse Reality with wishful thinking.

by klngofspades on Aug 27, 2009 11:45 AM PDT reply actions  

kingofspades I feel you

And I will say Garcias’ body of work speaks for itself, even at San Jose State he played with heart. Now, I understand what the Raiders have been, man do I, and Al and our coaching situation over the past few years well there can be no argument with you there. And yes, I have Raider gear that is 40 years old, lol and I knew the Raiders when they could have a terrible game but still win. Now, this is the first year in 5 that I finally see progress. Here is an example coming from a football player and not a fan. For starters Coach Cable did nothing but walk throughs the first week of practice, he worked on the mental aspect of players knowing where they are suppose to be. Quite frankly over the last 5 years the Raiders did not execute it was pitiful, meaning players were not where they were suppose to be, thus failure. If the Raiders just execute the plays properly that is 4 more wins. Last year games were lost because of stupid mental errors, and when you are paid like that, a mental error is the last thing you are suppose to have on a regular basis. And it was commonplace for the Raiders to give up leads and lose at the end of games. Now, you and I remember when we were the team that would beat you in the last minute of a game, and coming back on us, forget it. This Coach understands something Madden did, you have to know exactly where you are suppose to be every play to not get your ass kicked. Madden was a lineman and so is Cable, go figure. Look for a better team this year, I am not saying we are going to the Super Bowl or even the playoffs, I am saying we are going win more games than we lose this year based upon the mental aspect of the game being implemented in camp. Again if the players buy into it, 3 years and there is going to be hell to pay for opposing teams in Oakland again. I don’t fantasize about where we are as a team, however, this team is better than the last 5 for sure and this Coach understands first his players need to understand their assignments and know them clearly. Look for a better season this year kingofspades.

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 27, 2009 4:42 PM PDT reply actions  

The quarterback position is the least of our worries. One of the problems we have had is the quick fix mentality where we want to bring in a veteran at the end of their career, instead of developing young talent. Finally we have a roster built through the draft and some young free agents, although there is still that tendancy to go after players on waivers as the season is about to start. Getting quality players in camp should be more of a priority. Last year we claimed Ashley Lelie just as the regular season started and made him a starter. Do you think any decent teams were grabbing other teams cast-offs and making them starters at the last minute? We are probably going to do the same this year with a defensive end. Who ever is in charge of personel needs to attract higher quality players to training camp and get them the benefit of knowing the system well before the season starts.
My other beef is offensive line penalties especially in the red zone. Some teams go the entire season without a holding penalty or a false start in the red zone, we can’t go one half without that happening. It doesn’t matter who the coach is, is it just poor quality players, lack of discipline, lack of competition for their position, any ideas? Who many times have you watched the Raiders self destruct in the red zone and wish the coach would just unload on the player for a penalty, send them back to the dressing room or something?

by Oceanside Raider on Aug 28, 2009 12:19 AM PDT reply actions  

4 more wins Rodney ?

Here is our schedule. Show me 4 wins let alone 4 more than last year. I have 1 Win (KC at home) and 4 questionable, If we win 2 of those we’ll have 3 wins. This looks more like a first place schedule not a last place schedule. This is BRUTAL.

San Diego Chargers L
@ Kansas City Chiefs L
Denver Broncos ?
@ Houston Texans L
@ New York Giants L
Philadelphia Eagles L
New York Jets ?
@ San Diego Chargers L
Kansas City Chiefs W
Cincinnati Bengals ?
@ Dallas Cowboys L
@ Pittsburgh Steelers L
Washington Redskins L
@ Denver Broncos L
@ Cleveland Browns ?
Baltimore Ravens L

by klngofspades on Aug 28, 2009 1:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Good luck in getting quality free agents Oceanside

We can forget about attracting good free agents right now. I mean if you were a good free agent and wanted to play for a good team, Oakland would be the last place you’d want to go. Even the players we draft don’t want to play here and right now I can’t blame them. We are the laughing stock of the NFL. We will have to build through the draft and that’s not a bad thing. I agree we have had the quick fix mentallity with coaches, not necessarilly the players. It’s the coaching and teaching I have problems with because we’re not good at it. This is Al Davis’ fault. It sickened me when He brought Randy Moss here, what a terrible move that was. Dumping Kiffin was a bad move, Shannahan and Gruden were bad moves. I can go on and on but you guys know what I mean. Without some kind of stability you can’t compete. You can’t win with good players alone, every team has good players.

by klngofspades on Aug 28, 2009 1:40 AM PDT reply actions  

kingofspades, kingofspades everyone has to play

The games we should win Denver twice, KC twice both teams with new coaches and totally disfunctional offenses, with NO Quarerbacks, New York Jets, rookie QB new coach, Cleveland Browns, new coach Quarerback issues also, Washington Redskins, same issue, Quarterback problems and we out match them, by the way we can beat Dallas, they are ok, but they choke also. The Ravens have that D, but their running game has been missing and they still don’t score points, I wont just concede that game, same with Houston, they are improved but look at the match ups, again kingofspades this is all based upon Oakland playing to its potential. If we execute we can win games period, we have the speed and the talent to do so, but it still boils down to us executing our plays. That is the value of a week of mental football, also when you make a schedule today most teams are tough, but if we execute and not have the mental errors and start winning early, this could be a decent year. Nothing comes free, you and I are spoiled, now we have to earn it, our base is ok, they just need to make plays, also, I like the new offensive formations and how guys are getting open down the field now, so time will tell, I say we win 9 games this year, and the saga continues….

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 28, 2009 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

kingofspades it is better than it seems

I can relate to you because we come from the same place, however, not to be a overly optimistic but, we have a Coach that hits people in the jaw, now between you and I that is the mentality we lived with as Raider fans in the 60’s and 70’s. Players will go where they get paid, on free agency if a player is available and we pay em he’s on the way. But watch what happens, if our team can execute we will win, and man we can run the ball, our backs are no joke, best tandum in the league.

This is not the Raiders of old, Al Davis is not the old Al Davis he is older, but I think we got lucky with Cable, he was off the radar and he gets it. My cousin call me about the Raiders when he saw they only worked the mental part the first week, by the way, he has two Super Bowl rings with SF 49ers and he said regardless of what people may think, if Oakland ever executes its plays, their speed will kill teams. We are blazing fast as a team, so I was pleased to hear that of course, but needless to say. Time will tell all.

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 28, 2009 10:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Sorry Rodney

You are overly optomistic, splitting with Denver and KC would be more Realistic, That’s been the norm for the past 48 years except for recently when we’ve been getting swept by both of them. There is no way we will sweep them and no, we won’t beat Dallas or Houston on the road. We will not win a game against the NFC east. The skins are much better than you realize. That leaves Cleveland, Cincinnati and the Jets as possible wins and I say that because they will be up for those games becuse we are one of the tems they can beat. I don’t know Rodney, you are sounding more like a Rah Rah lets go Raiders Fan instead of a realistic one. As far as executing plays are concerned, if every team exectuted their plays everyone would be 8-8 but that don’t happen does it ? You need to be good in the trenches to execute your plays consistantly and you know we are not good in that area, thus we are not good in any area. Like I said before, lets not confuse Reality with wishful thinking.

by klngofspades on Aug 28, 2009 11:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Well kingofspades I call it how I see it

at this point we will get into the season and see, I will say this is the first in many seasons that I see the kind of progress that could mean wins. So I will leave it on that note. Had you read my post over the last several seasons, you and I would have sounded exactly the same, period. In no way were the Raiders going to win, and 5 games was a give me, they could have come closer to being a Detroit last season. This year offers something different and we will revisit this later during the season. Good or Bad, the Raiders will always be my team, though it is frustrating as hell, and I live in Indianapolis, IN lol, where they have the Colts and they are a good team go figure..lol. The Raiders will fair far better than last season..

by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 28, 2009 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Denver and KC

In case anyone is interested:

Denver has won 8 of the last 10 games
KC has won 11 of the last 14 games
Lifetime against Bronco’s Raiders hold lead 54-39-2
Lifetime against KC. KC hold lead 51-44-2

It doesn’t matter who good or how bad either team is, they always play each other tough and sweeping either way is not the norm. I love these games

by klngofspades on Aug 28, 2009 2:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50