A Quick Post Game Wrap and Rant:
Interestingly enough, the mood leaving the Coliseum was pretty much staid. Not too many people were upset because they saw a VERY entertaining game. Which, being honest, was a moral victory for the Raider Nation.
In the final standings, yes, we are 0-1. BUT I guarantee that the Chargers want nothing more to do with us, and that goes for the rest of the AFC.
Can I "Say any More about "Sey-Mour" than blast the fact that he was the most dominate player on the field? From the stands you can easily see that he is the biggest player on our defense. He is HUGE!!! And he came up HUGE tonight! He WAS the man on top of the quarterback tonight. Twice!
And Tyvon was all over the field making plays tonight. Whether it was laying out LT or playing hard on ST, Tyvon showed that he belongs in the starting line-up.
Mc-Bush was fantastic tonight, in fact, I wondered why we even passed the ball once in the first half, except for the seem passes to Miller.
And what about Chris Johnson?!?! yet, another Al Davis find who has really come into his own. He was laying the wood and covering them good!
Did the refs pull out a screw job on the Raiders, per usual? Of course they did. In fact, being screwed by the guys in "Orange?", is in the Anti-Raider play book:
Rule 37-6.5: From here on out we shall do whatever it takes to make Al Davis look bad and make out corporate conglomerate look great. Which includes translating the rule book to the best of OUR ability, even if it means making "stuff" up.
Can someone out there PLEASE explain to me how a receiver can catch a ball, land with both feet in the end zone, possess it after contact and then NEVER lose possession after hitting the ground and be called for not catching it?
That is the crux...That is the pain that I feel...Well, that and having to watch Phyllis Rivers' antics on the sideline. I really think that I hate him and I think that many Charger fans know that he is...I can't go there. I am still too sore. About as sore as the Chiefs will be next week!!!
So, here, write about your post game thoughts...
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank You J-Mac
Cheffers: We had a situation where the receiver caught the pass in the air and as he is coming down to the ground, he is actually going to the ground. That’s a defined term in our rule book, a player, a receiver who is going to the ground. The rule book says, if a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass, with or without contact by opponent – so that can be on his own; In this case, he got hit by an opponent – he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete. That wasn’t the case. What we ruled, what we saw in replay, was that he was going to the ground, as he came down the ball came loose, he lost control of the ball, the ball skidded along the ground, he eventually completely lost control of the ball. So, by rule, by what we saw in review, it’s an incomplete pass.
Q: So, this has nothing to do with him having both feet down – it has nothing to do with that, it has nothing to do with making a football move? It’s just what you said there?
Cheffers: Yeah, he was up, I think if I remember, (on) one foot, he was getting contacted prior to his second foot coming down. By definition in our rule book, he’s going to the ground and has to maintain possession of the ball throughout the entire act of the catch. And in this case, he lost possession and the ball hit the ground. Therefore, it’s incomplete.
THIS IS COMPLETE BS!!! He cuaght the ball and it NEVER came loose until he hit the ground. It didn’t even move as the DB made contact. ABSOLUTE GARBAGE!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 15, 2009 1:24 AM PDT reply actions
That was the point.
Err.. yeah. The point is, it has to NEVER come loose…AT ALL.
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Sep 15, 2009 5:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Here’s the conversation that went on with Raiders beat reporter Steve Corkran and the man that considers himself an NFL referee, Carl Cheffers:(source RaiderBeat.com)
Cheffers: OK, so what’s the question?
Corkran: "We just want the ruling on why you decided to look at the play at the end of half on when you called touchdown for Louis Murphy, then you said that you wanted to review it, and then it got overturned. What was the ruling on that?"
Cheffers: "OK, great, let me just grab the (rule) book here, and I’m going to read you what the book says. We had a situation where the receiver caught the pass in the air and as he is coming down to the ground, he is actually going to the ground. That’s a defined term in our rule book, a player, a receiver who is going to the ground. The rule book says, if a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass, with or without contact by opponent – so that can be on his own; In this case, he got hit by an opponent – he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete. That wasn’t the case.
What we ruled, what we saw in replay, was that he was going to the ground, as he came down the ball came loose, he lost control of the ball, the ball skidded along the ground, he eventually completely lost control of the ball. So, by rule, by what we saw in review, it’s an incomplete pass."
Corkran: "So, this has nothing to do with him having to – he got both feet down – it has nothing to do with that, it has nothing to do with making a football move? It’s just what you said there?
Cheffers: ":Yeah, he was up, I think if I remember, (on) one foot, he was getting contacted prior to his second foot coming down. By definition in our rule book, he’s going to the ground and has to maintain possession of the ball throughout the entire act of the catch. And in this case, he lost possession and the ball hit the ground. Therefore, it’s incomplete."
Corkran: "It was pretty clear-cut?"
Cheffers: "Pretty clear-cut."
Corkran: "Carl, thank you for your time."
Cheffers: "My pleasure."
What a load of crap! This was not even a controversial call, it was just plain and simple a terrible call that never should have been made, shouldn’t even have been reviewed. And even with a review, there is no way that in any angle of the review, that wasn’t a reception and a touchdown.
In other cases, the ball carrier is dives towards the end zone with the leading tip of the ball a nose-hair crossing the paint of the goal line and the ball being knocked out after and THAT is a touchdown but Murphy’s wasn’t. Just incredible. It seems that every time the refs need to screw the Raiders, they are able to dig deep, deep down into the rule book and somewhere in the fine print they will find a way to interpret a way to blow a call for the Raiders. You had to know that when it happened that it was going to be the difference in the game. At a minimum, we should have been in overtime.
The NFL is still making the Raiders pay for the Holly Roller!
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
At the very Worst:
It is a fu,ble recovered by the receiver and a TOUCHDOWN!!!
The ground cannot force a fumble and two feet, control and contact in the end zone without losing control until you hit the ground, without EVER losing complete control, The ball merely slid witin his grasp AFTER this all happened…Terrible Call!!!
But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 15, 2009 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions
No
The ball hits the ground as Murphy goes down, before he lets it go at the end. And while the ground can’t force a fumble (assuming contact with a defender) it absolutely can cause an incompletion. If you catch a ball while diving and then when you hit the ground the force of the collision pops the ball loose it is an incomplete pass.
It’s also impossible to fumble in the other team’s end zone. As soon as you establish possession in the end zone it’s a touchdown.
by Brendan Scolari on Sep 15, 2009 3:02 AM PDT up reply actions
What game did you watch?
You go up, make a catch, get hit, hold onto the ball until your butt hits the turf. Your down, that’s a reception. Just like Steve Young said in the commentary. Unfortunately, as Steve Young also said, and showed last night, the Ref in the review box didn’t have access (Apparently) to the same view we had as spectators. The Ref saw only the view from behind, which showed a glimpse of the ball come out while Murphy was on the ground. From the view the Ref saw (Which isn’t the view the rest of the nation saw… it’s 2009, how he didn’t have access to it, I’ll never know), I can understand how he made that decision. The question is: Who decided to review the play? But, as dissapointing a loss as it is, we move on, play with the same intensity and dominate the AFC West. Go Raiders.
As neither a Raider or Charger fan
I am perplexed as to how you guys think that Murphy’s called back-touchdown was an unfair call. The receiver has to hang onto the ball all the way through the catch. The ball hit the ground as Murphy came down. The fact that his feet had already hit the ground is irrelevant, he still must maintain possession all the way through, which he didn’t do. It seems pretty clear to me.
by Brendan Scolari on Sep 15, 2009 2:58 AM PDT reply actions
soo...
explain santonio holmes td catch in the super bowl he had 2 feet in and it was a touch down…wtf
by blacksamurai33 on Sep 17, 2009 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Slow Clap
I just wanted to say “Good game” from Bolts From The Blue.
I’d be lying if that game didn’t scare the hell out of me. The consensus in our game thread was 1) That was definitely a TD catch and 2) Tom Cable is a heck of a coach. How the heck can you take a team that was so lifeless and turn them into a battering ram in one offseason?
Just like the Broncos took the victory in the “Hochuli game” last season, Chargers fans will take what we can get out of this one. However, karma has a way of fixing these situations later in the season.
I will say that I’m happy that I called the Raiders for 2nd place in the AFC West all along. That’s a good gameplan you have there, you just need a more accurate QB. I’ll also thank you for leaving some of our players with the ability to walk.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 15, 2009 4:02 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Chiefs won't be sore....
We almost beat the Ravens….just like you almost beat the chargers. Ravens have a way better defense/team than chargers and OUR backup QB had 3rd highest qb rating. Although we did give a lot of yards up on defense. Your running game scares me. Lets hope for raiders sake that Russel doesn’t throw too much. Your defense looked awful tired in the 4th quarter. Oh, and raiders have a short week. Good luck!
Reason we lost
Did anyone here notice the defense we were running the last two Charger drives?
Prevent defense………..
It is now clear that if we have any sort of lead, no matter how much time is left in the fourth, Al Davis will keep using prevent D. This WAS NOT Marshall who was calling a truly magnificent defensive game. It’s clear now that Davis does in fact call some plays because Ryan and Marshall have been forced to put a prevent D on the field and it’s killed us countless times.
"You'll take my life but I'll take yours too. You'll fire you musket but I'll run you through. So when your waiting for the next attack. You'd better stand there's no turning back"- "The Trooper" by Iron Maiden
PRAY that this doesn't happen anymore.
If it does, we’re in for a LONG season.
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Sep 15, 2009 5:54 AM PDT up reply actions
yea ur right
rushing three guys … what is that i couldnt beleive it dropping the lB’s ten yards deep on 3 and 12 and again on 2nd and 10 i think it was unreal man do what got u there rush the QB and agian no blitzes to speak of just a four man rush if we didnt have seymour where would have been
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."
by TheAutumnWind on Sep 15, 2009 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions
What I noticed
is that the Chargers, who had been running 2WR formations all game, started running 3+WR formations (usually 4, with Gates as the 4th) and spreading the Raiders out.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 15, 2009 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I think that things are finally turning around in Oakland.
I’m happy with a moral victory.
Hey their Raider's fans
I am a Steelers fan (not here to squabble) and a BIG Maryland Terps fan and alumnus. I only caught the 1st quarter last night because it was on late for me. I just wanted to come over and ask about D. Heyward-Bey, “Hey Bey Bey”.
I saw in the box score he had no recs at all. Did he even suit up or see the field? What are your guys expectations for him?
" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.
he had two drops and wasnt as effective as u would have hoped for a 1st rounder
but he did start and had plenty of playing time but was outshined by louis murphy our other wr drafted this year… my expectations are that he settles down and makes the routine catches and then he can become the deep threat he was intended to be much like u saw louis murphy do when he caught that td in the 4th quarter
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."
by TheAutumnWind on Sep 15, 2009 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions
He was shut down by Quentin Jammer, which is to be expected of a rookie going up against a shutdown corner.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John Gennaro on Sep 15, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Targeted at least 4 times
Dropped two catchable balls, and Russell threw two poor passes in his direction. It looks to me like Cable, Tollner, and the Raiders are still trying to figure out exactly how to use DHB.
yeah cover four
is actually what we were playin and really it isnt a bad defense in that situation but there was a couple of times that when they did that famous dump off pass to sproles and our linebackers would try to come up and SLIP on the field…. its all about givin up 4 to 6 yards at a time, not the 15 they were makin every time. what we should of done was play a man with whoever was in the backfield with rivers
It was the same thing that Tom Brady did to the Bills for most of the game. Little dinks and dunks of the 5-yard variety and letting his guys make plays. Our LBs gave them too much space.
On another note, I thought that Marshall was supposed to bring some blitz packages with him this season. Am I mistaken?
Disappointing loss, but headed in the right direction
Tonight’s game was really a rollercoaster of emotions for me. Prior to the game I was extremely nervous about the Chargers winning streak, and I was having flashbacks of last year’s MNF debacle.
Those nerves subsided as the Raiders ran rampant over the Chargers defense in the first half and the Raiders defense was applying natural pressure and forcing Rivers to make perfect throws while forcing LT and Sproles to run sideline to sideline rather than endzone to endzone.
The Murphy catch was a tough one to call. My pseudo-biased opinion says that while the point of the ball certainly hit the ground and caused the ball to move, it didn’t appear that Murphy actually dropped the ball until the play was over and he was standing up. The angle the official review relied on doesn’t show the ball in his hand very well, so from an “indisputable visual evidence” standpoint, a very tough call. I can see why the refs called it the way they did, I’m just not sure I agree with it.
Still, at the end of the day many of the things that haunted the Raiders in ‘08 came back to get us again last night. 1/3 in red zone efficiency, three 3-out drives in the 3rd quarter, switching to cover 4 defense without spying Darren Sproles (I’m looking at you John Marshall and Thomas Howard). The Raiders must feel gutshot after making a really ballsy play on 4th and long to take the lead to giving it up just 2 minutes later.
In the end, I think if the Raiders can be competitive against the Chargers without JaMarcus Russell having a very good night it is a positive sign. Hopefully as Schilens and Walker get into the game more the passing game will develop further and the Raiders can win more close games like this one. I like our chances against KC next week.
Russel's Accuracy
is a concern…12/30 …some of that is dropped balls by DHB he had two and Mcfadden dropped one too but that is still 15/30 if those were caught… Also DHB dropping those passes are not what i wanted to see… with that said this team looked so solid in all aspects of the game except kick coverage but sproles is a gem on ST… Seymour and Ellis are both great DE’s we have the personel to play cover one almost exclusively… Miller is awesome so is Murphy, Bush and Mcfadden are awesome… The O-line was incredible only one sack all night and the rush game could pick up short yardage at will this is a good team and will win at least 7 or 8 games this year i think
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."
by TheAutumnWind on Sep 15, 2009 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions
bOGUS
call in the 2nd and you are all talking abt it. didnt get to see all the games only the first half but oh god that run offense was taering it up, and Seymour and Ellis got the job done, both had a sack in the game which means theyre getting pressure. cant wait to see them next week verse a far more inferior team than the Chargers.
MEAT IS MURDER!! mmm tasty bloody murder.
Not so sure
First the positives…
The raiders shutting down SD for 3 qtrs with a dominating D; the play of Seymour, (!!!) he looked great and his presence will free up the rest of the DL because of the double-teaming; Murphy looks like he has the makings of a good NFL caliber receiver; the OL powering the run game and giving JR some nice protection.
Negatives:
The way they lost was too infuriating – it looked like a typical Davis prevent D or sloppy zone, what ever you want to call it. After dominating SD for 3 qtrs why would they switch to a cover-4, prevent, slop-D, whatever? I can understand blowing coverage for one huge Sproles gainer from a short dump-off – and the LB slipping didn’t really matter that much as he was way out of position and unlikely to have stopped the play anyway. But continual such plays, over and over?? It’s like the commentator said – until they can prove they can stop it you keep doing it, and the raiders proved they really suck at cover-4.
They’ve lost this way more than a few times over the years. On game against KC comes to mind when at the end of the game KC needed a TD to win and the raiders have them around their 40, only to have Johnson take a short dump in the center with absolutely no one around and run it all the way down to the goal line. Is this a Davis favorite when trying to ‘hold-on’ to a lead? Why didn’t they smarten up after the first big gainer to Sproles but allow it way too many more times? It’s either stupid play by the D or a stupid scheme by the staff and it cost them the game.
JR really stinks! I’m amazed he managed to hit a wide open Murphy for the go-ahead. What we have here is another Leftwich with a cannon arm and low accuracy. At least the commentators called it correctly in bashing his lack skill in that area and not assigning it to “learning curve” or something like that. I counted 3 drops (not incl Mcfadden as that one was too high and outside) and this would have given him 15 for 30 or 50%. There were simply too many misses on open receivers not to mention some pretty bad decisions.
DHB – ?? I think I saw 2 drops by him. Is this going to be another wasted 1st rounder? I hope it was just opening night jitters.
Overall, great effort, great play by Seymour but terrible D decisions from the coaches allowing SD to easily march down the field for 2 critical scores.
I Was At The Game
And my god, was it a entertaining game. You have to see Seymour live to believe what you are seeing. That TD pass was a catch and we were robbed. But, If you haven’t seen a Home Opener, you don’t know what you are mssing. I love the Raider nation.
If Winning Isn't Everthing, Why Do They Keep Score? - Vince Lombardi
Great game last night, Raider Nation
You guys really should’ve won that game, but your team is headed in the right direction. Hopefully you can steal that one back at the Bolts’ house later on in the season.
The defense looked really good the first 3 1/2 quarters, but the linebackers gave up way too much yardage to the Bolts on 3rd and 12, that really decided the game.
The offense looks to be the biggest concern. The D gave Russell plenty of opportunities to put the Chargers away, but didn’t cash in on them. He has that great arm, but he’s so inaccurate…not a good sign for someone who’s in his 3rd NFL season.
Based on the Raiders overall play last night, I think the team will get more respect this season.
Do I believe in aliens?" Stephon Marbury asked. "I don't know, because I've never seen one. But I believe in Jesus because I saw him in the shower the other day."
JR
it’s frustrating to watch but as we mentioned earlier, he left school early, missed his first training camp, etc. He is raw. To add to that, he has new rookie WRs who are discovering crafty DBs and the NFL. He was 3-18 to WRs; timing and accuracy was way off. It’s expected. No different from watching Favre and Cutler deal with new WRs and system. He will improve, guaranteed. What we will hurt us is quickly falling behind without establishing the run. We got ourselves a competitive team; 8-8 is still achievable as long as JR develops.
JR
We should fire the DC and we should run the triple option because JR couldnt hit the ocean if he was standing in it. I stayed up till 2am to see an 86 yard losing TD drive. Damn, I was mad!
The Call
It appears the zebra got it right, but he did a terrible job of explaining it to the crowd (and the TV audience). From Peter King’s column this morning (someone who actually looked up the rule in the book):
Here’s what the NFL Rule Book has on this call on page 51: “If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact with an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete.”
I maintain that the Raiders did not lose because of a call in the 2nd quarter, but because they allowed the Chargers to walk down the field with little opposition at the end of the 4th quarter.
"If Vin Mazzaro comes anywhere near me with shaving cream he’s gonna be coming away with a bloody stump" – Dallas Braden
It might be in the NFL Rule Book, but effectively, how many times has that specific rule been enforced in that manner? Seems like whenever the Raiders play, the refs go out of their way to look at every wrinkle/interpretation of the rules to screw us over.
I’m with you about your last comment though. We didn’t lose because of that call; if anything, it may have given us a shot at OT. Overall, I am SO proud of this team. They didn’t give up, and our defense really worked hard to keep us in the game.
depends what “goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass” means… Elsewhere, the rule book defines “possession” of a pass as getting both feet down. It seems the “goes to ground” might have been meant to apply to apply to diving catches and the like.
Also, the above wording “in the act of catching a pass” is different from “A player who goes to the ground in the process of attempting to secure possession of a loose ball (with or without contact by a defender)” quoted (?) here. I think with the “attempting to secure possession” language it was clearly a catch, because he had secured possession according to the rulebook definition of “possession” (complete control with both feet down in bounds.) “in the act of catching a pass” is less clear….
With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery
by mikeA on Sep 15, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Chaz
Can anybody remind me when Schilens is expected back on the field? From what I’ve seen so far, Murphy stays as a starter opposite from Schilens. DHB showed why many believed that the Raiders reached for him in the draft. He has high potential but we cannot expect him to be one of our two starting WRs at this point. However, he can give JaMarcus a big threat on long yardage situations, can stretch the field to allow Miller and others to find holes in the zone.
Schilens
Chaz has been reported as saying that he will be ready for the KC game, while other reports have stated that the Raiders will play it on the safe side with Chaz and have him ready for the next week against Denver.
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
by TheRaiderWay on Sep 15, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
KC Fan Here
Just wanted to say that the game last night was awesome. I was one of many who thought the Chargers were going to dominate.
I was very impressed with your defense. As always your run game looked good and even your qb had some good things going for him. I was really hoping for the upset and it was so close.
I can’t believe you got robbed on that TD. Were the refs trying to give one to SD for the Ed Hocculi call last year or something? That was flat out wrong, I thought they were going to be better this season about having indisputable evidence to overturn a ruling on the field. Very disappointing in the officiating.
Overall though I think as a team, the Raiders looked so much better than most people expected. I am looking forward to week two, I hope that with the game being in KC we get the real home field advantage. I know it will be a great game. Good luck on your season!
can't wait to see schilens
i also hope jr start to get some chemistry with his receivers. it seemed that not only were the receivers route running was a bit off, but it seemed jr’s accuracy and chemistry with his receivers need to be worked on.
Good Start
I liked the effort from team last night.The defense looked great for 50 mins. of that game and i couldn’t be more pleased with the effort from the defense job well done.My hat comes off to Big Al and coach Cable for the Seymor trade and my apologies to the both of them for my thoughts about this football team all summer.Talk about an instant impact WOW.But now to Russell when I see all the California Qb’s and we have this guy.Just think if we had any of the Pac 10 Qb’s that did very well in the opening weekend, bottom line is we need a qb that has shows leadership and can make great plays with his head ,legs and arm not just a great arm.Russell you have to make that step this year.Good luck this year boys I really enjoyed the game last night.
Raiders offense thoughts and season feasibility
You need to take into consideration that Jamarcus executed a gamechanging drive with less than 3 minutes left. On top of that, it was 4th and long that they scored to take the lead. I dont know about you, the past Jamarcus never could make that kind of play in that situation and that can onle be good for the Raiders. If the D could of stopped the Chargers on the last drive, we would be sitting here praising Jamarucus saying how amazing that play was instead of picking apart his performance and complaing about the overturned Murphy TD. That play was the exact reason that the raiders drafted Jamarcus in the first place. Sometimes it just happens that whoever has the ball last wins, time has to run out sometime. The bottom line is he gave the Raiders a chance to win at the end of the game and according to Steve Young that is what seperates good qb’s. Of course, there was some rough patches in the middle of the game but Jamarcus isn’t capable of flawless play for 60 mins. He is not Drew Brees and probably never will be. I would of like to see the Raiders implement the run further. They started off with robust running between the tackles and it started to trail off. The Raiders offense ran the ball the first qtr and the chargers team was barely on the field. The Chargers will have a hard time scoring if they are on the bench along with any other team. Maybe even more short passes to Mcfadden like screens or swing passes and checkdowns because he can explode for the big play anytime. On the first jamarcus pick, what an awful route by the WR, you have to come back to the ball. Most of the game the WR didn’t look too good and mixed with a few badly thrown balls it was a little painful to watch. That is why I would like to see Jamarcus to start the game with some short throws to the WR then go deeper. Jamarcus plays a lot better with confidence and you can tell that it incrementally goes up everytime he’s on the football field. After seeing the TD drive, he should have some success against KC and the Raiders will not have to play nearly as well to win that game especially if Cassell is injured.
Football is situational which correlates into the game being determined by a handful of plays. Right after the Raiders scored the go ahead TD, you have to think wow theres a lot of time on the clock and they might not get the ball back if SD scores. I would like to see Jamarcus be able to construct one of those 12 play 80 yard drives that ends a the game with 1 second left with the Raiders going ahead at some point, that is the mark of a good qb. This is the season where Jamarcus’s future will be determined because Al Davis isn’t getting any younger and his patient will snap. Inside of Russel’s head he must know he has to perform this year or his guarantee of being a everyday starting QB will be tested in the offseason.
All that being said, the Raiders still have the potential for a good season especially if they can take advantage of the mediocre compeitation which includes the lowly chiefs twice, broncos twice, bengals, houston, washington, cleveland which are all possible victories in the making. If they go 2-5 against the dallas, eagles, jets, pitt, giants, chargers, ravens part of the schedule then they can finish with a winning record. The key is beating all the non-elite teams consistently because if they drop a few games to the weaker part of the schedule expect another losing year.
I don't know about the rest of you
But I was pissed off at the end of the game! We should have won that game by 20 points! Whoever called the defense on the last drive should be taken out back and shot, (I will buy that bullets). The only thing the prevent defense prevents against is winning! The play calling in the whole second half was suspect. Why they went away from the run when it was working so well, (not to mention demoralizing to the bolts). All in all a very good job by most of the players screwed up by some bad coaching.
PREPAREDNESS_Because those goddamn zombies aren’t going to kill themselves
Upon further review
That play to Louis Murphy (which was ruled an incomplete pass) was very similar to a 3rd down play in the 2nd quarter where Rivers threw a pass to Antonio Gates in the middle of the field. On that particular play, the exact same thing happened where the ball popped out of Gates’ hands after he hit the ground. If you look at that play closer, you can see that the ground didn’t cause the ball to come out, but rather a raider took it from him. The difference on that play was the refs ruled it a catch and that he was down by contact. Looking at that further, it clearly should have been an incompletion, which meant the Chargers would have had to kick a field goal.
If I’m correct, in ruling the Murphy play an incompletion, the point that the refs made was simply that Murphy did not maintain full possession of the ball throughout the whole play. Well, couldn’t the same be said about the Gates play?
I’m with you, Saint. I have absolutely no idea why “a receiver can catch a ball, land with both feet in the end zone, possess it after contact and then NEVER lose possession after hitting the ground and be called for not catching it”. It makes no sense.
As I’m writing this, the Razor and Mr. T are talking to callers specifically about this play, and both think that the refs ruled the play correctly. The disappointing thing about this is, neither the Razor and Mr. T, nor any of the callers, are talking about the Gates play. And even more disappointing is that no one here on this blog is talking about it. Where are you guys?
Note to readers: Go to NFL.com and type in Raiders on the search engine, find the video highlights of this game and check it out for yourself.
by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Sep 18, 2009 5:33 PM PDT reply actions

by 






























