"Who" Is "Hue" Jackson? Is Hue Jackson The Answer To What Ails The Oakland Raiders?
Time and again last season, you, me, myself and the rest of the Raider Nation were subject to a gaggle of large egos that left this team in disarray.
Tom Cable was actually calling the plays, coaching the offensive, rather "UH-Fensive", line, was in charge of player personnel moves AND leading the troops as well as ansering to the media. Not ONCE did he say that it was too much to "Bear". He does look like a bear.
Al Davis clutched his spidery talons around HIS prize from the 2007 draft and his own ego let JaMarcus Russell start for the first 9 Games.
Now it seems that clearer heads are functioning.
I do believe that if you allow Tom Cable to be the "Figure-Head" of the team, a position which he has shown remarkable ability in, while the assistant coaches run the game plan that this TEAM can win next year.
IF it is true that Tom Cable has given up play calling duties and will concentrate on the O-Line and Team Building then he may be the best man for the job.
That brings me to my first question...
Who is best for the offensive coordinator job, or rather, is HUE Jackson best for this position?
He has worked with Cable before (Jackson was an Offensive Coordinator when Cable was the O-Line coach at Cal). He is coming form an offense that is built around the run and NOT making mistakes with the football. He has also coached at USC (Offensive Coordinator from 1997-2000), which Al Davis loves.
I want to get this question out there and I will update this story throughout the weekend, but, S&BP, is Hue the best for this job?
0 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
Personally would like Gilbride from NY
but as long as Cable doesnt it is an upgrade.
USC sucked from 97-2000 btw. They didnt return to glory until after Carroll came in which was 2001 I think.
by Bud Light on Jan 23, 2010 9:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I thought about that as I was typing it:
I kept it because Al LOVES his Trojans!!!
It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Jan 23, 2010 9:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Offensive Coordinator
Right now, we can’t go wrong with Hue Jackson. How many more people in their right mind would want to take this job? I don’t think there are too many people out there. Jackson has my vote. I think he is up to the task and has earned it.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 23, 2010 9:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He has NOTHING to lose:
If the team fails at the start of the season, then, he may be Head Coach by late October. If he succeeds here, he may replace Cable anyway.
It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Jan 23, 2010 9:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Hue
I think if we can get some decent play calling, replace a few problems on the offensive and defensive lines, we should be a 8 win team at least. I’m open to an 8 win season, i just want to see this thing going in the right direction!
Tommy Kelly's ass won us that game against Denver!
by Robby1987 on Jan 23, 2010 9:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
.500
Oh, it sounds so sweet. I hope the Oakland A’s can be a .500 team in 2010 as well.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 23, 2010 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's my goal/hope for 2010 as well
For both teams, but especially the A’s. They’re a lot closer to .500 in terms of expectations right now than the Raiders are.
@worldblee on Twitter.
by worldblee on Jan 26, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am actually becoming quite excited for next season
I think cable is the best option at this stage and with a more experienced play caller it should work well. Getting the d-line coach fromnew York is a great move and we are really building on the good offseason we had last year. Obviously free agency and the draft will be interesting but again last year I think we did pretty we in FA resigning nam and lechler and getting some proven vets like Ellis, I’ve heard some interviews with Seymour and he seems excited about what’s going on in Oakland. Bring on next season already!!!
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
by Ozraider on Jan 23, 2010 10:18 PM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
If we don't hire an OC
I am quite sure that we will have a repeat of last season. And this time it will on Al because he should have fired Cable and hired a new coach and OC and then should sit back and let the coaches do their job.
Cable will ruin this team.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 24, 2010 4:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sticking up for Cable, but
if Cable has divorced himself entirely from playing duties and Hue Jackson is hired as OC to run the entire offense, then how will Cable ruin this team?
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
by TheRaiderWay on Jan 24, 2010 4:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well if you see
the subject of the comment you replied to was:
“If we don’t hire an OC "
If we hire an OC it may be a little less bad. But how long will it take Cable to get the balls again to bench Russell? And Cable would still be able to over ride an OC’s decisions as head coach.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 24, 2010 4:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, bring in another puppet, And You will never see the end of Russell.
If we would have gotten another coach same shit again with Russell playing almost all of the season with a new confusing playbook(for him). Atleast this puppet can come alive sometimes…
The RaiderLaker
by Raider9 on Jan 24, 2010 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cable & Russell
OK, I’m good with keeping Tom Cable. Let’s face it. The players like him and we don’t have a chance of getting someone like Chucky, or Cowher. It is what it is. No coach with any kind of record wants to be Al’s whipping boy.
BUT! What about Russell? Are we going to keep him? The stands are half empty already. I’ve read a lot that they’re are a lot of fans won’t renew their season tickets if we keep Russell. What is Russell doing this off season? riding around in his rolls, in his fur coat, wearing that insanely large diamond stud in his ear? is he decided to start out doing what he needs to do to get in shape to help his team? Is he going to study his play book and come to camp knowing more than what’s on one page? It would be nice to know the answers to these questions. i’ve been a hardcore Raider fan since ’66. I want to know if I have anything to look foward to.
by biggronn on Jan 24, 2010 7:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
if we get an OC
you can be more optimistic. Otherwise, expect more of the same.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 24, 2010 7:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Best for the job?
NO, but can we really get the best available coaches? Not a chance. The team seems to like Cable, so keeping him as the HC while bringing in an OC to handle the play calling is a great move in my opinion. No OC will jump ship to come to Oakland to take on the same position, the only way is to promote someone to make it worth coming here. I would love Gilbride, but he won’t leave NY for anything less than a HC job.
"We can't stop here... This is bat country."
by Kwester421 on Jan 24, 2010 7:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think
Al’s logic is Hue jackson coached both Carson Palmer (USC) and helped develop Flacco in Baltimore so if he comes in as OC he will also help with JR (if its at all possible) 2 birds with one stone kind thing.
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
by S-n-B4life on Jan 24, 2010 9:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i totally agree
if cable is the coach, then al will get hue jackson to be the o coordinator and help develop j russell. also hehas coached with cable and did good things with qbs
by sports with steve on Jan 24, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What this means is
Davis is willing to throw another season away for a pick that won’t ever develop.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 24, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly this is Al's intention - develop Russell while developing the running game
and relieve the mad pumpkin of play calling. (By mid-season we will know whether to call him Hue or Phew or Poo.) Hue will also be a player in draft selections and he and Marshall will be having some interesting conversations about critical needs(HaHahh) with Marshall insisting on DL needs while Jackson is shaking his head and calling for OL … Al, at that point, will end the debate b/c Jamarcass is in the balance and the scales tip (slam down) on the OL side.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 26, 2010 7:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hue is excellent with WRs too - he developed Cincinnati's receivers into leading corps
in 2005-2006.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 26, 2010 7:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm hoping he can improve our WR production
In the passing game, our WRs are weak on catching technique and route running. Our playcalling wasn’t good, either. If we get improvement in all three areas, there’s hope for much better production even if we keep the same WRs.
Our #1 pick from last year might even get more than 10 catches…
@worldblee on Twitter.
by worldblee on Jan 26, 2010 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DHB has been mentioned till now worldbee and I believe that was another
big factor in Hue’s being hired. Play calling, the WRs especially DHB, and Russell. That’s why Hue’s here. Our deficiencies are being addressed though I’ve only about 3% faith that Russell will ever be an NFL qb.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 26, 2010 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a lot of pressure
on guy that never had a whole year of OC and a relative spotty record on different positions.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 27, 2010 6:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you really think coaches
especially assistant ones, have any say in the draft?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 27, 2010 6:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That depends entirely on the individual coaches' credibility with Al
If Al respects him as a ‘football man’ then he will listen otherwise he won’t. Why should Al take the advice of anyone who doesn’t have his confidence?
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 27, 2010 7:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would Al hire such a person?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 27, 2010 5:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When Al hires them he either believes they're better than he later discovers or
has a particular need in mind. But just because someone can call plays (OCs) or run defenses (DCs) doesn’t make them a better judge of talent than Al.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 27, 2010 7:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well wouldn't you think Davis would
ask around about the guy before hiring? I mean when you apply for a job don’t you usually give references?
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Jan 28, 2010 9:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely. I would hire Price-Waterhouse to investigate his past
interview teachers, neighbors, coaches and friends – and especially interview him closely, maybe even have him take a psychological examination. These 1st rounders cost so much that the cost of an appraisal is proportionately meager. In this regard, Al is either: behind in modern-day best practices or has (after Russell and Bey maybe “had”) invincible faith in his own judgment.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 28, 2010 2:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are putting too much on an OC
Hackett is considered one of the best QB coaches in football and he couldn’t bring Russell around so why would anyone think that Hue would be better? God knows we need a new OC because Cable is lost in that role, but what does that have to do with making Russell better. I would love to see a new offensive strategy with a heavy dose of Bush inside the tackles and McFadden on the outside. More importantly stay with it, of course that means some new offensive linemen on the right side. Also teach the backs to slow down and hit the holes rather than run very fast into the first defensive lineman or backer they see.
By all means bring in a new offensive coordinator, don’t care much who it is. Let Cable be the spokesman and let the other coaches coach.
by Laoren on Jan 24, 2010 1:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
every time i hear hue jackson
i keep thinking of wolverine
by ToeSocks on Jan 24, 2010 2:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I love this guy's personality and believe the player's sucesses during his tenures
with Cinci and Baltimore and all had everything to do with his being there, but it is not judgment of the entire “units” he coached with all those teams. Go back and look at those overall performances. At times mediocre, and others spectacular.
Also, why the changing of positions he coached? Was it for inability to produce at the positions before, or because they recognized his talents to coach other players in their positions?
I want a risk taker, and someone who could give a shit what Al thinks will work, and can’t wait to prove the way he’s arguing will, and ultimately does. If he’s that guy (don’t think he is) then I’ll take him. I’m with the rest of the guys. While we had no guy to call plays and coordinate the offenses and implement a system, we did have Paul Hackett, arguably the best qb coach, and Tollner, well respected with results to prove as a passing game coordinator, so I’m inclined to ask the same questions we’ve been, over and over again: how’s he gonna be any different?
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
by brhynno on Jan 24, 2010 6:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
As I read my previous post...
maybe it was that unlikely combination, of a head coach not capable of wearing all the hats, having a qb coach and a passing game coordinator trying to make the offense work with Jamarcus, and an inexperienced running backs coach, and lousy blocking personnel (Gallery, Henderson, and Satele had their moments) is the reason it’s been impossible to get going. Maybe also the reason for calling primarily passing calls, coupled with the stacking of the box we blamed on Jamarcus inability to qb?
that 4th quarter Gradkowski had against Pitt. could attest to the energy poured into the passing game, and the lack of assertion of a running backs coach and evident by the playcalling; could that indicate an Emmitt Smith(I’d have said Marcus Allen, but well, that won’t happen unfortunately in Al’s lifetime) type guy to come in and coach the running backs could propel this team from the scrapheap?
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
by brhynno on Jan 24, 2010 6:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
............ u think al will sign a guy that says
screw you ill do what I WANT
by ToeSocks on Jan 24, 2010 10:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
not in so many words. one that can manipulate the art of persuasion at least as well as Gruden can
and even Callahan could, inheriting a super bowl caliber team, anyways. He actually acted more as an offensive coordinator that year, imo anyways, and Gannon was enough a leader to be a catalyst and kind of player/coach. I know many will disagree with me on that, but it would also explain about how responsible Gannon and Callahan were for that horrible excuse for an offensive effort; nothing taken away from a spectacular, Monte Kiffin coached defense full of pro bowlers.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
by brhynno on Jan 25, 2010 10:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what if bringin in hue
isnt all about jamarcus for once?? this guy has developed people like chad ochocinco and T.J. “whosyourmama” lol so maybe al is lookin at darrius and all the young guys on our recieving core too. im sure he knows that paul hackett is one of the best or else why bring him in at all? let him continue to work and let this hue guy put his 2 cents in also and it might not be a bad combination.
by frank7da2tank on Jan 25, 2010 12:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hue Jackson is a man of many talents.
coached RBs WRs and QBs aswell as OC in college and the pros. Jackson not only worked with Cable and Waufle in 96 but then went to work under Hackett at SC. Atleast Al is bringing in familiar faces together and for once i believe its for the team and not just TUBBY. But Jackson’s OCing is a passed based offense and his 2 previous OC jobs the running game was in the bottom of the league, but he coach RBs so who knows. One ting is he hasnt had a winning record as a NFL OC under 2 former college coaches who didnt last more than a season in the NFL, so hopefully, with the cable dude, 3 times a charm. im anxtious to see if we hire him and if we do for next season. Im all about Waufles return!!! HARD ASS!
by rodeosnake12 on Jan 25, 2010 10:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
what if hue
He is a man of many talents that developed those recievers in cincy and worked with some vg QBs. I would welcome a real Offensive cord. calling the plays. If jbustus doesn’t work hard in camps, cut him. Bruce has earned a decent contract and to start for awhile. Hue could be a great influence on our offense all through camps. we should draft some help on both lines as well. give the coaches some upgraded lines to coach.
we don’t have enough hard ass coaches. I am for waufles return as well.
Silver & Black 4Life
by THE AUTUMNWIND on Jan 25, 2010 5:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is Baltimore's back-up Troy Smith coming to Oakland?
Poised, young QB with a strong arm and mobility
Enters 2009 having seen action in 10 games (including 2 starts) and has completed 43 of 80 passes for 534 yards (long of 79t), 3 TDs and no INTs for an 87.2 QB rating
Smith also has rushed 21 times for 78 yards and 1 TD, and has 1 pass reception for 36 yards. Saw action in 6 games (was inactive the first 5 games of the season due to an illness) in 2008, completing 3 of 4 pass attempts for 82 yards, 1 TD and no INTs for a 156.3 QB rating
Smith also rushed 9 times for 24 yards and caught 1 pass (from Joe Flacco) for 36 yards
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jan 26, 2010 7:22 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This would be sweet! The beginning of the end of the Jabuster era!
Bring it fucking on!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
by brhynno on Jan 26, 2010 10:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if cable stays
this could be a new begining for the silver and black. 2 very good hires on the staff and if al decides to keep him, it will speak words for al to the locker room and the fans, if you like cable or not. the next sign that al is gonna surprise us will be FA’s and he draft. if the correct positions are filled with pretty much the same coaching staff and the consistancy of keeping them, these players are going to be excited and pumped instead of having to meet a whole new coaching staff and pretty much start over. atleast up to now our off season has been a success, waufles a hard ass proven WINNING coach, and jackson is coming from a winning team!
by rodeosnake12 on Jan 26, 2010 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
what if the jackson hiring gets the "other" harbaugh
excited and he decides he wants to coach this team. might not be to far fetched.
by rodeosnake12 on Jan 26, 2010 10:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















