Teetering the Totter: Seahawks-Raiders Preview
This is a big game for many, many reasons. Let me just say the most obvious and biggest reason: I have large amounts of money and pride on the line for this one.
I am more nervous than I once was, but not as nervous as I used to be.
My bets were made in the offseason and after the draft. I was cautiously confident at that point. Then as the Raiders closed the preseason against the Seahawks and the Seahawks seemingly cut half of their roster I was brimming with confidence. After Week Six, I was making plans to leave my northwest home and go into hiding.
Last week returned me to the cautiously confident category. So, after all of that, I am seemingly right back where I started. The betting public seems about in-tune with my confidence as the Raiders are a 1.5 favorite.
I realize that reasons outside of me have to count for something and this matchup has some other areas of importance. The biggest of those? This game signifies the point at which the Raiders have played all the teams from cities starting with "S". A loss here and they are only 2-2 in these games. How many of us sat here and said, "The Raiders need to be over 500 against the S teams if they are going to do anything this year." If they win this one, they guarantee that.
Now onto some reasons of lesser consequence.
This is the Raiders chance to make this season meaningful. This is their chance to create some momentum and this is their chance to finally teeter the totter and get to 500.
It has to happen one of these times right? Well, if it is to happen this week the Raiders are going to have to win the matchups and there are some really interesting ones in this contest. We have strength against weakness, strength against strength and weakness against weakness.
Bird Crap On The Pirate Hat
Seahawks Pass Rush vs Raiders Pass Protection
Surprise, Surprise look what matchup is on the list again. The Seahawks get to the passer in a lot of ways. DE Chris Clemmons leads the way with 5.5 sacks and in second is SS Lawyer Milloy with 3.
Needless to say, they like to blitz and they can do so often, because their run D forces teams into 3rd and longs. On the year the Hawks have 19 sacks and are ranked 11th with a 6.5 percent sack rate. 10.5 of these sacks are from defensive lineman. The Raiders are going to see pressure from different spots and angles.
Red Zone Defense
The Seahawks D has been stout in the redzone this year. Teams are getting TDs just under 35 percent of the time when they get into the redzone. This is the third best percentage in the NFL. The Raiders, while vastly improved since the early stages of the season, can still struggle in the redzone (see SF game). The Raiders are currently 20th in redzone percentage at 48.
Fried Seachicken In The Pirate Belly
Raiders Pass Defense Vs Seahawk Pass Offense
Matt Hasselback is not the QB he once was. He comes into the game with 6 TDs and 6 INTs. His arm seems to lose strength with each throw.
Still, if given time he can do some damage. Fortunately for the Raiders, they should be in a position to limit his time. The Seahawks are 17th with a 6.4 percent sack allowed rate. The Raiders defense is 8th with a 7.6 percent sack rate.
To deal with less than stellar pass protection and a QB with no arm strength the Seahawks utilize a shorter passing attack. Hasselback averages 6.1 yards per pass attempt and they are ranked 29th with 9.7 yards per completion.
The majority of these passes are going to Mike Williams. The last two weeks Williams has 21 receptions--the next is Deon Butler with seven.
This is another great opportunity to have Nnam shadow a WR. Williams isn't going to blow by anyone, but he is using his body well and holding onto the ball. Nnam can match his physical play and throw off the timing.
Raiders Screen Pass Vs Seahawks Defense
I don't have any numbers on this, but Seahawk observers have told me they are struggling against the screen pass. They attribute this to the blitzing and the lack of awareness of the D-lineman. A few well-timed and executed screen passes could change the game.
Lester Hayes And Steve Largent Holding Hands
Seahawks Run D Vs Raiders Run O
This is certainly the most intriguing matchup. The Seahawks run D is currently ranked 6th in run DVOA. Their run D showed its first glimpses of weakness last week against Arizona. Most people attribute this to the loss of blocker eating DT Brandon Mebane. Mebane is expected to practice this week and you can only assume from their that if things go well, he will be playing on Sunday.
On the year, the Hawks are ranked second by allowing only 3.3 yards per carry. The Raiders are averaging 4.7 yards carry, which is good for 6th best in the NFL.
Seahawks Run O Vs Raiders Run D
On one side of the rushing ball we have strength against strength and on the other side we have vomit inducer vs vomit inducer. The Raiders are giving up 5 yards per carry. That would be good for second worst in the NFL. The Seahawks are getting 3.7 yards per carry. This would be good for fifth worst in the NFL.
The Seahawks run game has improved somewhat since they got Marshawn Lynch, but not much. Lynch and Justin (I wish Mike Mitchell got cut) Forsett, are splitting time in the backfield. The speedier Forsett seems to be more of the style of back that the Raiders have left for Michael Huff to miss tackle on his way to the endzone.
Zach Miller Vs John Carlson
The Seahawks are ranked 10th in DVOA against TEs. A solid number, but TEs Antonio Gates and Vernon Davis both had above average days against the Seahawks. With Louis Murphy possibly not playing, Zach Miller is going to need to be active in the passing game.
John Carlson is second in receptions on the Seahawks and the Raiders have had their struggles with TEs. They have a 28th DVOA rating against TEs. If Nnam does shadow Williams, I expect Hasselback will be looking to his TE even more. A special assignment for Mike Mitchell perhaps?
How The Raiders Can Make Me Wealthy And My Friends Embarrassed
I'd feel a lot better if Gradkowski is well enough to play. I really don't think that is going to happen though. I have no confidence in Jason Campbell to perform while being hurried and I don't have much confidence in the Raiders O-line in picking up blitzes.
This means the Raiders will have to find ways to neutralize the pass rush. In a conversation I am having with John Morgan of Field Gulls, I had mentioned that one of the ways for the Raiders to do this would be to establish the run game.
He immediately shot me down and said this would play right into the Seahawks hands as teams that have tried this have wound up in 3rd and longs and then the D can really let loose with the blitzes. He then offered up a better strategy. Here is what he said:
Teams that want to avoid Seattle’s situational pass rush should avoid the customary progression of run to set up the pass and instead pass early as the Broncos did and as the Chargers did in the second half of week three. Kyle Orton and Philip Rivers combined for 21 completions on 31 pass attempts for 271 yards and a touchdown on first down pass attempts. Factor in Brandon Mebane’s sack, and Seattle allowed a discouraging 8.6 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt on first downs. To put that into perspective, in his record breaking 2007, Tom Brady averaged 8.9 ANY/A.
The more I think about the more it makes sense. I don't want the Raiders to abandon the run--I just want them to keep the defense honest. A couple of play actions on 1st down early in this game could go a long way. Another Zach Miller waltz into the endzone would suit me just fine.
The Seahawks like to play SS Lawyer Milloy in the box. This leaves rookie FS Earl Thomas in a Michael Huff type of situation. And while Thomas has made his plays he has also given them up by being out of position. This is something the Raiders will need to exploit.
On Defense
The Raiders cannot give up any big plays. The Seahawks offense has been struggling in the Redzone, they are ranked 24th in TD percentage, and the Raiders need to make them go through it to score.
If and when they do get there, for the love of Al, tighten up that zone! No more freebies!
The D-line needs to dominate a patchwork Seahawk offensive line. Seymour will likely be doubled all game and Tommy Kelly needs to take advantage of this. The Hawks will likely be without LT Okung and Shaughnessy, Scott, and Houston need to keep Matt uncomfortable in the pocket. And they should all be able to keep blocker off of the LBs.
This is a great opportunity for Rolando McClain to make his impact felt. The DBs need to disrupt the WRs timing with good bump and run coverage. Again, the big thing here is going to be to make the Hawks earn their points. No more defensive brain farts!
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Simple
It’s as simple as this. On offense, the Raiders need to play smart, turnover free, ground and pound football with the occasional play action pass to zach. On defense, the Raiders need to play like they all took shots of 5 hour energy. What I mean by that is they need to rush hasselbeck and make some big plays like they have the past three weeks.
by Raidercrazy1332 on Oct 27, 2010 4:16 AM PDT reply actions
I voted "Of course"....
….not because I believe it’s a foregone conclussion, but I believe they’ll have to to win the game.
Here's Hoping.....
Hoping, we can string back to back wins together and don’t revert back to strategies we know don’t work. Do we need to play our game? Yes. But we to be smart about it and not stick to things that don’t or aren’t working just because.
by BleedssilverandBlack on Oct 27, 2010 7:08 AM PDT reply actions
I think Run DMC will get two bills...but much of it will come from screens
I say let the sea hags blitz, will open up the screen and draw….Zack Miller will come up big this game as well….GO RAIDERS
member of the Raider Nation since 1968......(Heidi Game!)
Remember two weeks ago when we faced a team that was weak against the screen and had a good TE?
This is looking frighteningly familiar. The Cocks average 3.7 yards per carry but that doesn’t mean jack since SF was averaging 3.5 yards per rush and Gore managed to average 6 against us and had 150 yards. Also the Cocks have a better run D than SF and since D-Mac is back that should make that a wash. I really hope Grads is back too since JaJason hasn’t proven he can win a game with his arm yet and I think he may just have to this week without Murphy.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
It is a fair comparison
especially the defensive part. The one thing that makes me feel better is the 9ers were just bad at covering backs rather than just a screen pass. The Hawks players and system leave them to be vulnerable to the screen.
Also, as you said DMC should make a huge difference. I am counting on the biggest difference coming from the play calling. I think Hue learned a valuable lesson in the SF game.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Bill Romanowski said the same thing after Sunday's shocker.
He thinks the SF game was a wake up call and the team responded. This is the chance to prove this team has turned the corner finally.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
One slight difference between that one and this one
RunDMC will play in this one.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 31, 2010 4:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Cable won't abondon the run
Regardless of what we average vs the Seahawks. I hope to God that we don’t have the see Campbell try to win a game with his arm. I like this “put um away early” style of play we started last week. We should do that again. Like Happy Gilmore said “I should just try to put the ball in the hole on the 1st shot every time”.
Good Idea
But it’s going to depend more on how we start. I think Hue will have the first drive mapped out pretty well. He seems to be good at gameplanning, but the in game adjustments seem to come a little slower. Bottom line, we get 7 on our opening drive and I think we’re looking pretty good.
Marshall showed me a new look by blitzing Orton early (Routt was blitzing on CJ’s pick six.) and I’d like to see more of that. I’m pretty close to demanding we keep Mike Mitchell as the full time Will Backer, too. I think that will correct some of the underneath coverage woes, and he blitzes like he was shot out of a cannon. When Scott is a DE, it needs to be on the same side as Wimbley so we cans show zone blitz looks…the more we confuse the opposing OL, the better…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Oct 27, 2010 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions
It will be a tough game ......
But we win this one hands down by at least a touchdown , the only x factor I see is Campbell, Is he going to be the Campbell we saw last week – pushing the ball downfield and making good decisions or will he be 10.7 rating Campbell. That is my only worry but maybe this guy is starting to pick up the offense, lets hope so . Since the return of Gallery the blocking has improved , Veldheer looked good sans a couple of penalties and we got one at our house, so the 30,000 regulars who show up ever week will help too!
GO RAIDERS!!!
Bongsmoke
The 1st serius on offense and defense is going to set the tone for the whole game!!
Our first serious on offense is going to set our tone for the whole game, and the same goes on defense which is has happened every game the way we start our first serious is goin to dicate how the game is going to go for us.
Anyone can be a fan of a winning team, supporting your team when its down is what makes you a true honest fan.
Wait a minute... don't forget they played the Broncos. Their run D stat is fluffed up.
They went up against the Chargers too… and you know how Cry Me A Rivers likes to throw…
The RaiderLaker
That is a good point however Justin Forsett is an explosive back.
Also this is the week we verify our special teams coverage has improved. Leon Washington is one of the best kickoff men in the NFL. We must treat all the Seacocks with hatred and respect.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
Janikowski has almost completely eliminated the oppositions return game
It’s a good point though and if there is any wind limiting kickoff distance this could be a problem.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Good point about Sebas.
Keep in mind those 8 touchbacks came in the high altitude of Colorado. That is a huge difference in elevation.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
Then he needs to figure a way to keep it away from Deon Washington and Justin Forset. Our STs have improved
but why take risks if Jano can eliminate them?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 27, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Swiff kicks if the wind is a factor maybe?
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
can someone please find a way to show this thing to DMC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtI4Q2nB3D8&feature=grec_index
Don't Trade Monta
Bush is on Fire!
Huff likes it raw
by JohnnyDangerously on Oct 27, 2010 10:46 AM PDT reply actions
So yeah guys
Where is Rated R?
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
change his screen name?
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
by patriotguy2 on Oct 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Noon, the staff shouldn't be that stupid, they should see they rank 28th in Pass D.
Plus even if we establish the run, we will succeed. I remember the Texans were ranked higher in Run D and are way more talented that the Seahawks, imo. Dmac broke off a nice run early before he got that hammy and had to leave.
Plus, Especially if we keep causing turnovers, which to me is a bit infuriating that they are doing that now as if they never knew how to cause one unless taught to them; because I remember last year and the games before the Charger game I always saw opposing players exposing the ball and our defenders just tackled them and never attempted to punch it out aggressively.
Hint: Always swing at the ball when you tackle, but only if you are confident you will follow trough with the tackle with one arm and your body weight.
The RaiderLaker
thanks to Dubzfan i watched the game over again..just in 15 mins
I saw confidence from both sides of the ball. I loved it! The O line blocked a little better. The run blocking was outstanding. What i was most surprised about was the play calling on both sides. The D line made pre snap adjustments by shifting to strong side or the side they thought they were running too. It seems like the players are taking this more seriously. Great blitzing and run stopping. Even CJ got a pick 6. If this team plays like they did last week i cant see the Seahawks winning this game. I hope they all got the picture and are bringing it EVERY game!
My early prediction:
27-17 Raiders.
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters."- Bill Belichick
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Keys to victory
I’m just a guy on a blog, but it seems to me here’s the winning formula:
1) Stay out of 3rd and long or the Seahawks pass rush will come full tilt.
2) Pick on Kelly Jennings or Walter Thurmond. I’ll add something here and say force Lawyer Milloy into coverage; he’s a good run supporter but his coverage skills have faded. He’s almost full time in the hybrid linebacker position that MM34 sometimes plays. If he has to cover Miller, Zach will win every time.
3) Get in Hasselbeck’s face and force mistakes. He’s been prone to that the last few years.
4) Obviously, stop the run. A given for the 31st ranked rush defense.
Carroll has the Seahawks headed in the right direction, but their schedule has been soft so far. I think people are overrating them. I think if those 4 things are done, the Raiders can expose them.
We’ll be servin’ up a delicious 40 burger this week: 41-20, Raiders. Mmmmm, tasty Kool-Aid.
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
Good to see you Raybin. As always you raise good points.
Jennings may or may not play and Hawks fans are gushing about Thurmond’s performance last week, but still the Raiders need to test him and whatever nickel back they play if he can’t go.
Of course, it looks like the Raiders are going to have to do this without Louis Murphy, which limits an already limited WR corp.
This is a great opportunity for Jacoby or Nick Miller to have a break out game.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Thank you, sir
Given my opinion of DHB, I’d like to see the Tiny Twosome of Terror start. But we all know that ain’t happening.
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
You never know--maybe DHB will be too tired to play
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Hahahah, he does have a history of "fatigue"
Which is code for “stone hands and inability to separate” I believe
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
hands-of-clay-hit-the-hay
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 27, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
This would be a great week for DHB to have a breakout game
With the Seahawks undoubtedly going to stack the box to contain McFadden, it’d sure be nice if the # 7 overall pick started living up to his billing.
I’d also like a winning lottery ticket, a unicorn, and to have a torrid affair with Elin Nordegren on the rebound, but those aren’t happening either.
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
Wonder if it means anything that the Seahawks added a FB to the active roster this week
Move makes sense. Honestly, if their gameplan doesn’t consist of “run it down the Raiders’ throats”, then they’re insane.
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
I am sure they'll try to get into full beast mode with Lynch,
but they signed the FB ’cause their FB is hurt.
The more I think about it, the more the key appears to me will be the Raiders D-line. The Hawks o-line is not good. I am sure Seymour will be doubled. Kelly needs to make them pay and Shaughnessy, Scott, Houston need to put the hurt on Hassleback.
This would also be a great game for Rolando McClain to make a few huge plays.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Ah, I did not know Robinson was hurt
And yes, RoMac activating beastmode would be awesome on Sunday
Kamerion Wimbley is the truth
If the defense can force 3 and long and put pressure n Hassle-In-Back
I expect Nmandi to get some pick 6’s
Anyone can be a fan of a winning team, supporting your team when its down is what makes you a true honest fan.
Hasselbeck's made a real effort to avoid turnovers after the Denver game
While the offense certainly isn’t dynamic, its probably not going to be giving up many picks.
by Greetings from the Lord Humongous! on Oct 27, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I think Seattle will avoid throwing toward Nnamdi
Just as most teams do. Denver talked a lot about how they were going to challenge him, but they never did.
@WorldBLee
I think it comes down to the run game.
If we can stop Mcfadden I’m not scared of your QB’s, but if we can’t force you to put 8 in the box, i’m not confident in Hasselbeck.
Seahawks 24- 17
What? You aren't scared of the amazing Campbell to Ford connection?
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I Predict Raiders win
17-0
Anyone can be a fan of a winning team, supporting your team when its down is what makes you a true honest fan.
Son of Ja completed same amount of passes as Orton did
If his job is handing the ball off and quick screen passes we could replace him with TC and have similar results. IMO he’s still a glorified backup. Won’t win one, but might lose you one.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 31, 2010 4:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Is Seattle's Run D a paper tiger?
Without looking at the overall context, the Seahawks’ run defense looks excellent, posting the statistics noontide provided above. Yet, this unit has faced the 2nd fewest rushing attempts (140) in the league. At the same time, the Seahawks’ pass defense ranks 29th overall, facing the 2nd most attempts per game (41) and giving up an average 6.9 yards per attempt (18th in the league).
The past few years the Oakland Raiders have finished in the top 10 in pass defense in the league, which was hardly a consolation because we were always in the bottom 5 in run defense. Of course the Raiders were going to have good pass defense numbers – teams never really needed to pass against us to win. Even this year the Raiders’ pass defense was in the top 3 at one point, only to be crushed by Philip Rivers. It’s not to say they aren’t a talented bunch, the victory versus the Broncos proved otherwise, but the stats always seem to be misleading about them.
Is it possible now that the opposite is true of the Seahawks? Are teams simply abandoning the run against Seattle because they know they will have more success through the air? Could it be that Seattle’s run defense isn’t as good as the stats suggest, only now to be even further weakened by the loss of DT Brandon Mebane?
I don’t have answers to these questions, they are simply points of discussion as we move towards a pivotal game on Sunday.
It seems to me that the Raiders have two methods of winning this game: 1) Come out and dominate the line of scrimmage like they did last week and force the ball down Seattle’s throat; or 2) Come out throwing and take advantage of a mediocre Seattle pass defense.
I’m still nervous as hell about this game, mostly because I have no idea which Raiders team will take the field on Sunday.
It's a great point,
As Field Gulls Morgan pointed out, it is probably better just to pass against them. The Cardinals couldn’t and so they tried to run and had success.
Still, I wouldn’t consider the run D a paper tiger, because every kind of stat you look at, they are solid yards per carry and DVOA etc…. On the other hand, I also don’t believe they have faced a rushing attack anywhere near the quality of the Raiders.
Also, Mebane is supposed to practice tomorrow. My guess is he plays. This will be a good test for both teams.
I’ve said it before and I am saying it again, I want our D-line to dominate this game and keep their offense out of any rhythm. Then watch the Raiders wear out their big run stuffing d lineman in the second half.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions
I also don’t believe they have faced a rushing attack anywhere near the quality of the Raiders.
You’re right about that:
San Francisco (27th) – 49 yards on 19 attempts (2.6)
Denver (32nd) – 65 yards on 38 attempts (1.7)
San Diego (17th) – 89 yards on 21 attempts (4.2)
St. Louis (13th) – 88 yards on 28 attempts (3.1) – Jackson hurt in 3rd quarter
Chicago (29th) – 61 yards on 14 attempts (4.4)
Arizona (28th) – 113 yards on 20 attempts (5.7)
If the Raiders come out and execute on the offensive line the same way they did last Sunday against the Broncos I think they will prove that the Seahawks’ run defense has been overrated. Successfully running the ball will also eliminate the Seahawks’ pass rush.
That is some good wrok LiveAdam.
I think the 1st 2 games were very telling of how good their defense is. If Mebane can’t go much like Hendo for us I think we may actually have some success however we need to mix it up. We can’t expect to just line up and beat them in I formation or straight ahead all game long. We need to spread them out, call some stretch plays, tosses to the outside and some counters in order to see where we are most effective and stick with it until they prove they can stop it.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
I don't Understand
Those are stats against the Seahawks, so it shows that the Seahawks are good against the run. If you’re talking about the overall rank of the teams rushing attack that we have faced, well we have contributed to 1/6 of those ranks and brought their average down since they couldn’t run on us. If anything, this post validates that the Hawks can lower the rank of opposing teams (Gore,S.Jackson,Moreno,Forte,Wells,Hightower,Soon to be DMAC&Bush, etc..) rushing attack by being dominant against them. Those running backs listed are great RB’s that could could at the most get 5.0 yac between two of them.
by PhoneHomeET29 on Oct 28, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Ummm... no... we know Denver has no, no!! run game man. That fluffed you guys' stats too then-
-if you want to use that logic which you are using for your argument. Either way you guys won’t force a teams’ stats to fall all the way down like that. Lets say you shut us down to less than 100 yards rush yards… we will still rank in the top 10 rushing, maybe even top 5.
The RaiderLaker
Your Hawkcentric logic is cute, but check this out
Here is the common opponents numbers rushing totals against the Raiders.
Rams 75
Cards119
Chargers 91
49ers 158
Broncos 75
Only the 49ers numbers were much different and the Raiders rushing D blows! It is the first thing almost every team tries to do against them, unlike the Hawks
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 28, 2010 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions
did you say you made a bet on a regular season game in the offseason?
vegas was built on suckers like you.
Hell, I already have bets for the Hawks Raiders game 4 years from now
Besides, I gained a free 1 1/2 points on this one. Oh Yeah, whose the sucker now?
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand your confusion though
You need to have friends to understand how these kinds of bets work.
It's not what you know, but what you're thinking half the time.
by Rich Langford on Oct 27, 2010 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions
living in washington i understand u noon....
going into the season i thought goin 1-15 would be alright as long as we beat the hell out of the sea-hags.
Don't think the Seagulls didn't look carefully at the film from last weeks romp over Denver...
We will have to come out and hit the Seagulls straight upside the head if we want to win. I hope our guys are ready to fight to keep their momentum, because they have proven if they play well they can win big, and I am sure they would like that feeling every week. Now is the time to build momentum and the Seagulls are a perfect target to start with…Noontide and TAW you guys are right, but at the end of the day, we have to just come out and play physical Raider football…If we do that and just beat the man in front of us we will win…My primary concern is QB, it is still a week point even with Grad, though he gives us the best chance to win I think…As I stated before the season started, it’s not his game, he’s just injury prone.. QB should be a priority for the Raiders as well as O line this off season…Go Raiders!!!! See ya at the game….
by Rodney Sacramento on Oct 28, 2010 6:43 PM PDT reply actions
And that starts with the coaches. If John Marshall (formerly know as White Rabbit) and Uncle Hue
have their thinking caps on and loins girded, the team will perform as well or better than last week. We always have had the talent but lacked the magisterial orchestrator to galvanize it, lead and inspire it. If we do somehow have some semblance of last week Sunday, it will definitely indicate that we always had it and were stumbling only over ourselves.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 28, 2010 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
White rabbit?
I thought it was Marshamallow. SOB, you’re going to have start sending out memos when people’s nicknames change.
My biggest fear this game
Is not the Seahawks run defense or blitz, or any other facet of their game. It’s a letdown by the players and coaching staff. The Raiders get up for conference games more so than non-conference games, and given that we haven’t put together back-to-back wins in quite some time, there’s reason for concern. I hope we break our non-consecutive wining games streak, but I’m reserving optimism until I see a repeat of last week’s level of effort and preparation.
@WorldBLee
This game is gonna come down to
whoever plays mistake free, field positioning, less penalties, and who capatilizes on a defense mistake. Either blown coverage, missing a gap and P.I
Anyone can be a fan of a winning team, supporting your team when its down is what makes you a true honest fan.
Maybe not. It may not be a battle of who wins fewest mistakes. It could simply come down to
which team has the better coaching. I believe we have better player talent, and last week I was surprised that our coaches have some talent too. Now lets see some consistency from them.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 28, 2010 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Indeed
Much like the Arizona game, except we’d better make fewer mistakes, and Jano better be ready to win the game.

by 




































