Run D Summed Up In One Play: Arian Foster's 74 Yard TD Run
I have watched this run about 25 times today: LINK HERE
The defense lined up in a two deep zone with Kameron Wimbley playing outside of Houston on the Left Side.
Houston was lined up in a Power I formation. That, in my opinion is where this all started.
From there, the line sealed off our entire front four to the left and Wimbley to the right.
Branch and Huff were left alone to battle the FB and a lineman blew Quentin Groves up 10 yards downfield. The FB took Branch out and Huff completely blew his angle and was left trying to grab Foster around the chest. That in itself, by Huff, was terrible.
First mistake: Not calling time when they were in an obvious nickle/pass rush set and the offense was in a power I
Second Mistake: Not crowding the line
Third mistake: Groves getting rag dolled
Fourth Mistake: Huff taking a bad angle
Any one of these four could or would have prevented the TD.
94 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
3.5 Mistake, Branch swirved to take the blocker on instead of dropping low and plugging the gap
This play is disgusting. I don’t usually drink before noon but I need one now.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
What makes you think you'd be drinking before me?
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 5, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions
You are the funniest person I've ever seen in any SB Nation blog I've been on....
By far. You stay with the classic one liners. :tu (thumbs up)
by Raider Zealot on Oct 6, 2010 5:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Huff vision was terrible
he was so far back you would of thought he would of meet head up with Foster not end up chasing him from behind. Like Saint said he gave up the angle
have to disagree it is all summed up in one play BUT
not being on the field of course I could be off on this but usually there is a D captain who reads the formations and calls defensive adjustments. I think that guy is McClain for us so if rookie captain does not call an adjustment then that’s on the players, The coaches can’t step in every down and call time out. They should prepare our guys for these situations and I can’t imagine they wouldn’t.
bottom line is they gashed that side of the field numerous times with or without Foster’s run.
Cable dismissed reports that Andre Johnson wasn't playing and said they were preparing for
him and Houston’s fine QB. Apparently, the fear of being passed on was so strong that even the I-formation couldn’t budge this hardheaded bunch from their disciplined commitment to stop Houston’s vaunted pass attack. I doubt a double-wishbone would have caused the Marshmallow/Cable-prepared McClain to adjust the D; such was the rigidness of this disastrous and shameful game plan.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 5, 2010 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions
they have a d coordinator and lb coach
marshall is responsible for preparing the D not cable. Mike Haluchak (LB) coach has been sitting in his office (almost) since the day lane kiffin was fired supposedly working on this very problem. New personnel on the field, same result.
What the hell is Cable doing then? I see him doing nothing during the games and he shows
up covered in sweat at press conferences to give his ever growing hamstring report before spewing superficial and vague sound bites. But Marshmallow is tops on my shit-list after Sunday. Haluchak looks like a prison guard who spends too much time looking at pinups.
The whole crew is deplorable, honestly, it’s depressing having the Raiders in the hands of these cockroaches.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 5, 2010 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions
haluchak does look like a prison guard
and he came from the browns. Nothing personal against John Marshall but really, what sort of success has he recently had? He came from a bad seahawks staff under jim mora jr. They tanked the franchise pretty badly.
i don’t know what to make of al’s decisions with coaches other than they are the types of people who will not be insubordinate. Most coaches come aboard ready to do their own thing. All i see with the raiders are yes men, including hue jackson. Like good yes men they take the axe when it’s their turn.
The sooner the better
All i see with the raiders are yes men…Like good yes men they take the axe when it’s their turn.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 5, 2010 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Marshall was D coordinator for super bowl Hawks
Not that I was ever sold on him, but he has had recent success.
Also, I’d say breaking Al’s snitches face was a little insubordinate.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 5, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude, Marshall game plans a defense, in relation to Cable's vision. He's the head coach
Marshall is the coordinator, he runs the defense, it is not his schematics.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 6, 2010 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions
And Cable gets his vision from Al because Al believes only in his own vision
Change the coaches and get the same result.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
Good news is that Al's vision may be but on hold for this Charger game since the seats-
are getting hot. (Maybe though, maybe we will see some different schemes for this game, but then we will go back to Al’s schemes)
The RaiderLaker
Let's hope
The players and coaches bring their respective “A” games and we beat the Dolts! Ugly or pretty, let’s just get some wins!
Funny though, as much as our boys have lost to the Dolts, I still hate the Chefs and the Donkeys more.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
Well, that's probably because the dolts haven't won a SB ever
Chefs and Donkeys have, so you view them as more of an actual threat.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 7, 2010 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't think he's allowed to make adjustment's....
Simply because they don’t make adjustments. Oh you get a defender to go in motion with a receiver, but other than that the original set stays the same !!! I said earlier on another post, once they line up …….That’s It !!!! And more times than not, they’ve lined up out of position, considering the play that’s been run, and it’s after the fact it’s noticed!!! But this is what’s bugging the shit out of me. They can run that play over and fucken over again, and still NO ADJUSTMENTS are being made. That’s COACHING !!!!!
A lot of the fans on this blog are blinded by their love for the team they fail to recognize this.
Same reason Seymour was a one-man wrecking crew on a couple of plays. However if you see a good defense like Baltimore or the Jets play they have multiple players swarming around the ball at once holding players to one yard losses or two yard gains max.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 6, 2010 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions
+1
How ’’bout a turnover, or some pressure, or even a hurry maybe?
How is it that all of last year we were among the top ten in sacks, but one of the teams whose entire squad’s interceptions were eclipsed by a single player on another team? Lack of talent sans Nnamdi in the defensive backfield. We need all the ball hawks back there we can get, and it seems we’re sorely lacking after the Asom1.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Asomugha is all over the field, he makes adjustments! Ro Mcclain, makes adjustments,
mercurial adjustments, still, don’t paint the whole d with a broad bush. The Defense is a blitz first, tackle later concept, which would be an okay strategy, if you have safety help that can mitigate those 20+ yard killer plays. We don’t have that luxury.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 6, 2010 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Another thing, lose the pink trappings Cable - Raiders don't wear pink asshole
If you want to wear it under your trousers that’s between you and your priest but don’t fuck with this team more than you already have.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
The pink was for Breast Cancer Awareness.
It looks stupid but I certainly won’t fault the coaches or players for sporting a little pink one game a year.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
Bey could wear it each game, the way he uses his chest as a ball stop
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I am kind of surprised
at you a bit. It doesn’t look great I agree but every player/coach/team personnel member was wearing it as part of a league wide BC awareness.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions
The losses are making everyone just a little angrier.
Doesn’t seem like a commment he would normally make.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
Puh! Form over substance. If you care, give money to research. Empty sybolism.
You think wearing pink is going to cut down the frequency of breast cancer? God help us all
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions
No, but for the females that watch football... they are now "aware," not all of course, but for the
ones who brush it aside and think its insignificant and what not. Basicaly, the message can also be “get yourself checked.” kinda like those HIV, AIDS commercials. It may work, it may not.
I’m surprised you missed the point of the whole movement. Awareness is the key word.
The RaiderLaker
I haven't met a woman yet who is unaware.
Speaking of gender-related cancers, prostate cancer can be a killer too – a few months ago I read the blog of a college sophomore who was diagnosed with some advanced stage of it. From what I’ve read, most men develop it as they age. It’s a slow-growing cancer, except when you are young. What would be the color for prostate cancer awareness?
by Spirals galore on Oct 7, 2010 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Hey don't shoot the messenger
It is worn to create and keep awareness to the fore front I believe. Without awareness you have no one to be aware and reminded of required funding.
As far as “giving money” if that refers to me you have no idea what or how much I give to charities (that would plural for accomplished not for suggestion)
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 7, 2010 5:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm already aware of breasts. But if you're okay with the Raiders, or yourself, in pink trimmings
I’ll understand.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions
For a good cause and one game
yes I am. Some people need reminders of situations and disease issues and this by no means is a sacrilege to do it for once again a good cause. Its not about breasts it’s about a disease.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 7, 2010 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Just seems a bit useless; didn't see any increase of palpating at this game
A tailgate examination booth is better than this symbolic act (and a lot of guys would man it for free).
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Every team in the league wore pink which I think was a good move.
It’s not the pink that makes them look less manly. I think the 249 yards rushing surrendered and the 4 TDs did that alone.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 7, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
and wearing pink had nothing to do with it?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Speaking of this, the Bears O-line and QB Cutler all didn't wear pink.... and guess what...
Cutler got sacked 9 times in that one game and left the game concussed. Enough said. Don’t bring bad ideas, and karma. I want Grads to live.
The RaiderLaker
safety is our weakest postion
its time to get rid of branch and huff and start someone else. mitchell and ugene, see if that works or maybe pick up lewis the safety from the 49ers. can we do any worse at that position?
by sports with steve on Oct 5, 2010 9:47 PM PDT reply actions
Cabke said Monday, "We are playing the right guys." He is content, all is well, we're in the pink
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 5, 2010 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions
can we do any worse at that position?
Yes we can…..
I’m fine with Tyvonn as the starter but take him out in passing situations. He’s a solid defender against the run.I wanna see Brown go in for HUff
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." ಠ_ಠ
You're fine with the SS, but you want him out on passing downs?
Chewbacca was not an ewok.

Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 5, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions
My head didnt explode
Your pic fails
Anyway, is it a bad thing to have some strategy? Tyvonn is solid against the run and But isnt great against the pass so you put in a better coverage safety. Why is this hard to understand? Certain players go in on certain situations, its not anything new or groundbreaking. If you want we start Brown and put in Branch on running situations, its the same thing
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." ಠ_ಠ
I don't understand how you could be fine with a SS you don't like in passing situations
It’s not like we’re talking about a DT. I understand your strategy, it’d be similar to what they did with Huff and Eugene the first half of last year, but the fact that they’d even have to consider this makes me not fine with the SS position.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 6, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
lol, you did it again!!!
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 6, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Consider
Branch 23 solo tackles, 5 assists, 1 sack
Huff 20 tackles, 3 assists
McClain 15 tackles, 9 assists
These are the team leaders.
Regarding the pass:
Routt 4 Passes Defensed, 1 Int
Nnamdi 2 PD, 0 Int
Groves 1 fluke Int
Underwhelmed is a good word for the whole defense.
I am not underwhelmed with the pass D
except for the zone redzone package. 4 passes defensed with a pick is solid and Nnam has more passes defensed than catches allowed. This is epic.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 5, 2010 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Sigh
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Ok hold on one sec
You have made 2 posts about defense. They seem to be contradictory. The first one you solely blame Ro with your headline. Now it is Huff, Groves and Wimbley basically. So may I ask you to come to a consensus and make a choice as to the blame does belong to, either as a person or group.
IMO the coaching blows and they are no where near teaching Ro the way he should be and confining him to the 1970’s D calling plays with almost no shift or audibles. We are for sure fielding the wrong group of guys for the most part and utilizing them poorly (an understatement).
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 7:06 AM PDT reply actions
Edit to my post
I meant to say you blame Huff, Wimbley and Groves basically on this play as an overall analysis. How does Ro factor in now? Where is the coaching in terms of well coaching and recognition of a needed time out or at least trying to get a shift from the sidelines to the D?
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 7:13 AM PDT up reply actions
Ro was out of the play:
They were playing nickle.
Ro had the worst game, but, as far as the team goes, this one play shows all of the elements that make them stink.
It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Oct 6, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes. Mostly on the coaches here
if you can even call them coaches.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Your post is stating it was on the safties but the main two are Groves getting blasted of the line and the defense not making adjustments once they saw the formation.
McClain did not play well as mentioned in your other post but he is only drafted to play MLB for a defense that has no clue what their prime function is. He should be the ILB with another experienced ILB beside him and a 330+ LB NT in front of him. Instead he is playing MLB with a bunch of other guys playing out of position. That is our run defense in a nut shell and we didn’t even need to play a game to figure that out.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
I agree in part
Not sure about the 3-4 concept. Not sure we have the bodies at LB. We could however do some hybrid D with some personnel switches in in situations or to God Forbid have a different look. Ro is not to blame IMO. The coaches and his royal highness are at the root of the cause.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Right now we don't but McClain's development is retarded with this scheme.
He has not clue what to call because the coaches are like, oh shit Al is on the phone. He noticed we were running a zone-blitzing and a 46 formation. He doesn’t like it. Also the players are the fault of the owner again. We could have had Cam Thomas in the 4th or 5th round but he wanted to draft Jacoby Ford or the robot instead. Also all the other years before this year when he drafted style over substance we couldh ave had more bodies out there to help McClain get acclimated to the system. Maybe if this had happened we wouldn’t have even gotten a chance to draft McClain because the players would have kept us from drafting in the top eight for once.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 6, 2010 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions
defensive coolaid
because of the stinking offense, the defense was not exposes last year as the fraud that it is. We kept blaming the offense, so much so, that even Cable made a 24 point declaration.
Now What? The defense has been exposed.
Stewart Schwi****grt all over again.
Marshall sucks. The scheme sucks.
The safeties are garbage.
Actually, Ro seems to be the only one with awareness along with #21.
Yes! Except if Henderson and Seymour weren't hurt, it wouldn't be so bad
Safeties, Puff and Bow, are hurting us and we’re short a stud at OLB (better Howard than Groves).
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 8, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Adjustments?!
What’s that?! Adjustments, you want adjustments? In the game? half-time? on capable personnel? offensive line? utilizing McFadden as a slot runner? defensive schemes? make interceptions? cause turnovers? blitz the quarterback? move Nnam around? coach at least like the fans would? pick up some quality trades? Damn!!! It hurts!!!!!!!
Will the addition by subtraction of Randy prove a super bowl ticket for New England?
or be the deliverance for Brett?
Not likely on either count, but I’ll be watching closely…
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
I really like Randy Moss getting play action off AP's insane running game.
They’re def better with Moss out there,
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 6, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Too late
He should have stayed with the Patriots. The Vikings’ window was last year. This year, Brett just doesn’t have it, and there probably won’t be a next year for him. It couldn’t last forever, and Randy’s getting there just in time for Tavaris Jackson to become the “the man”.
There is not one DB in the NFC that can cover Moss 1 on 1, maybe it is too late, Moss is
still a beast and they came close to winning the Super Bowl when he was there, they didn’t even have a running game. Now, with Adrian Peterson that offense is more potent.
I’m not saying it’s a game changer, it’s easier to throw a post to Moss than to any other receiver they had.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 6, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah they were pretty desperate
to pick up a warm body to catch balls. Childress must be shitting a golden brick and making sacrifices to the gods to get a win this week against the Jets. He must have got down on hands and knees to get Moss too. Very very very desperate at this moment.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I doubt either
will get a ring just another brides maid ceremony for both.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Oct 6, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions
The Vikings must be planning a new cruise
’cause they just traded for a new whore.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 6, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Since they technically are bringing back the same whore
I wonder if they get a free sandwich this time.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 7, 2010 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions
Groves Played terribly, and seemed lost on his assignment.
When he whiffed,He was in perfect position but hesitated and looked weak to react.
I would give Groves another week, if he doesn’t play well…ship him out.
"May the wind be at our back, here comes the Silver and Black "
That's right. But Cable is going to have to adjust his point quota; 24 isn't going to be enough with the running teams we face
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions
The only way I see this as a close game is if both DHB and Murph are ready and not injured.
The only way we win is if Bush pound away with success and DHB and Murph bothe get 100 yards recieving.
The RaiderLaker
If Bey is our lifeline, we're screwed. Grad will keep it close like always by getting to whomever
is open. Bey has crotch issues
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Bey has crotch issues?
Seem like they’re the only balls he hasn’t dropped.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 7, 2010 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions
you guys are capable of making a run with the horses you got. Big athletic offensive line, a good defensive line and a solid Linebacking corps, A shutdown corner, and athletic safties
Your wr’s well they just run vertical routes and let Zack Miller run post over the middle.
Thanks, but...
Big athletic offensive line
you’d never catch any of us saying this about this group we’re fielding…
If we lose this game to you guys again, I’m fucking done with this team (for awhile at least!).
I’ll walk away from the game and devote my energy to something more productive; perhaps it could be a good thing? I’m sure you guys understand a little. Must be how you feel when you get to the important playoff games…
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Run def and pass def against Texas from a Raider fan in Houston who listened to player shows here
Some Texans players have come out and said that the success with the run was based on an allignment issue with LaMarr Houston and Q. Groves playing the run like a DE and not a LB and scraping off his block. M. Huff’s poor angle made a 20 yard run into a 74 yard run. On the Texans TD pass to TE Dreesen was based on film study of Raiders tendancy to go to zone in the red zone and LB’s not being able to react.
by Ronnie D Johnson on Oct 6, 2010 7:28 PM PDT reply actions
Yep, you guys ran circles around our coaches whose motto is "bend over but don't break"
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Michael Huff can't tackle consistantly
I’m watching the game again on NFL replay, he gets burnt on both big touchdown runs, he ain’t no Ronnie Lott. Also both outside linebackers didn’t do anything at all.
by Oceanside Raider on Oct 6, 2010 10:48 PM PDT reply actions
A bad day for Groves, Branch, Huff, Bey and Murphy
But Mario had a good game!. It’s been writen, Mario protects Bruce as doth the mother bear her cub.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2010 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
i totally agree and i am tired of our safeties getting beat on runs and grabass tackling.
i am not convinced of branch and huff as the starters at safety
by sports with steve on Oct 7, 2010 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Mario may have had a good game but our offensive line as a whole deserved a D-.
We gave up four sacks in the first half alone. I would have preferred a blatant hold over some of which came at the most crucial points in the game.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 7, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions
exactly
I’m glad someone here actually reviews plays in detail. We need to put Howard at safety or something because this ain’t working.
I would prefer a more powerful Strong Safety and Free Safety. I would try mixing in my new idea, Howard, with old ideas, Brown and Mitchell.
As I’ve mentioned before, with 5 (lineman) + 1 (fullback) + 1 (tightend) = 7 Blockers VS 4 (lineman) 3 (linebackers) = 7 Defenders.
What’s left to make the tackle? Safeties. Heeeeelloooooooooooooooo? Marshall?
Branch's favority play is....
him following the opposing running back into the endzone.
No shit. More silver medals thatn anyone
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 8, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
new orleans saints Jerseys
http://www.sportsjerseysshop.com
Our website is persisting on best customer service. Please come and enjoy it!
We only provide AAA quality of products. You can make purchases without scrupulosity. All of products can be ordered from our website directly, also, you can contact our professional customer service to get more new orleans saints Jerseys about payment terms, the intention of cooperation etc. The most preferential price: Our competitive price make our customers confident to develop their own business, at the same time, reaping big benefit from this transaction. Our favor tends to the customers who are from United States, Britain, France, Spain, Germany and Australia etc.

by 




























