The Tipping Point: Charger Week
LB Sam Williams on the San Diego Chargers and the Raiders 13 consecutive losses to them:
We don’t like it. We don’t like the Chargers at all. We don’t like anything about them. We don’t like them, so we’re going to end this streak. That’s our goal . . . it’s something about the Chargers, San Diego and the Raiders that don’t mix.
Lightning and pirates were never meant to happily coexist. Raiders, no matter how merciless, tough or cagey are often left at the mercy of mother nature. Even the powerful can be reduced to nothing but helpless victims dangling in the whims of a greater power.
They do not, however, have to succumb to their surroundings. Instead they can outwit and outlast their opponent. Given the fact that the Raiders are 1-3 and facing a team that has beaten them 13 times in a row, is vastly statistically superior and wildly more healthy the Raiders appear to be on the edge of a major storm.
They can either crash and drown under the pressure of the waves or they can learn to thrive as Riders on the Storm.
One thing is painfully certain, this season lies on the precipice of obscurity.
The Chargers are a tough matchup for any team right now. They are the first team in 23 years to be ranked 1st in yards on offense and defense as late as Week Four.
With the Raiders losing the battle to hamstrings and a few other injuries, it doesn't make the matchups any rosier. It is almost certain that the Raiders are going to be without the services of John Henderson, Darren McFadden, Robert Gallery, Quentin Groves, Chaz Schilens, Travis Goethel, Thomas Howard, Walter McFadden and Michael Bennett.
Still, the Raiders will not be defenseless and while they don't have many victories to show for it, they are displaying a knack for battling adversity. All off-season we heard and talked about the culture change in this organization and about the high character, hard working nature of this team. What a better time to show it than now.
As always, this game is going to come down to the matchups on the field of play. Here is what those are going to look like:
Angry Zeus Crippling Somalia's Economy
The Chargers Pass Rush vs The Raiders Offensive Line
Ugh...I am so tired of this weakness being as obvious as Philip Rivers' Camel Toe. The Chargers pass rush only managed to get nine sacks last week. Despite the feeble number, they present a formidable foe for the Raiders pass unprotected unit.
This impressive total actually doubled their total going from six to 15. Leading the way was DE Shaun Phillips with four last week and six on the season. The only other Charger with more than one sack is ILB Kevin Burnett. He has two, both of which came last week.
Shawne Merriman's status for the game is up in the air, but before we get to excited about his absence, it should be noted he didn't play last week either.
The Chargers are second in the league with a 10.6 percent adjusted sack rate (this stat is simply percent of pass plays the team gets a sack).
Oakland currently ranks 25th is adjusted sacks allowed rate. I'd like you to meet my friend, Doom.
Chargers Offensive Line vs Raiders Defensive Line
All of a sudden, the Raiders are stupidly thin at D-Line. John Henderson's absence combined with the need to move Trevor Scott back to WLB, means the Raiders have only 5 base down lineman that have played this year.
San Diego is currently 15th in adjusted sacks allowed rate at six percent, but it is there fifth place ranking for run blocking by Football Outsiders, that really has me worried. 50 percent of the Chargers carries go right up the middle, where the Raiders now only have 3 healthy DTs on the roster.
The Chargers three main RBs are averaging just over five yards a carry. Amazingly enough at 5.3 yards per carry the Raiders are allowing even more yards per carry than the Chargers are getting.
Please meet my friend's brother, Gloom.
Lightning Never Strikes 14 times
Raiders Backs and TEs Receiving vs Chargers Pass D
The Chargers are giving up 10.7 yards per completion to RBs and TEs. 41 percent of the completions and 43 percent of the yards they have allowed through the air have been to RBs and TEs. While the Raiders will likely be without the services of McFadden, Michael Bush is a competent receiver.
The Chargers will also have to adjust to the absence of their chemically enhanced starting SS Steve Gregory and seemingly an entire team worth of injured LBs. As the Raiders showed last week, they can really move the chains throwing almost exclusively to their backs and Zach There's-more-than-one-tight-end-in-this-game Miller.
On the season the Raiders are averaging 10.4 yards per completion to RBs and TEs. 61 percent of their completions and 54 percent of their yards have come via these guys.
Umm....
I try to do two of these for each team, but it's hard to say there is another matchup weighted towards the Raiders. I wanted to put the Raiders Running Attack vs Chargers Run D here, but the Chargers are only allowing 3.8 yards per carry on the season.
The Raiders proved last week that they can move the ball on the ground vs a top flight run D. They averaged 4.7 yards per carry while gaining 118 yards against the Texans.
The Eye Of The Storm
Raiders Secondary vs Chargers Passing Attack
Without Vincent Jackson the Chargers lack anything resembling a #1 wide receiver. They compensate for this by spreading the ball around. Philip Rivers is as good as anyone at going through his progressions. The Wide Receivers are also aided in getting open due to the fact that half of the oppositions defense is watching Antonio Gates.
The Chargers passing game starts and ends with Gates. The Raiders are uniquely equipped to deal with Gates. They can and have had Nnamdi covering him. Also, Tyvon Branch has shown the ability to slow Gates down. Branch, while being a step slow in zone coverages has always been decent in man and he is one of the few guys with size and speed to actually hang with Gates.
Philip Rivers is about the only QB that has not been shy to throw Nnam's way and he has had some success doing so. The difference is that this year, he will not have Vincent Jackson to throw to. Nnam has been as good as ever, which will allow the Raiders to either double Gates or leave safety deep to help if Nnam is on Gates.
Last week's Cardinal game was the first week the Chargers haven't had a WR with a catch of at least 49 yards and each week it was someone different. Expect the Chargers to test Nickel corner, Chris Johnson at some point.
What Needs To Be Done To Snap The Streak
The Raiders are going to have to improve on run D. They should be able to hang with the Chargers on pass D and maybe even force them into some turnovers if they can get the Chargers into some third and longs. Chris Johnson will have to be someone other than the guy that was playing Week Four of the pre-season.
They will have to win the turnover battle.
Micheal Bush is going to have to step in right where Darren McFadden left off. He will have to successfully run at Shaun Pillips to slow him down in the pass rush. Also the Raiders will have to exploit their screen game with him and Marcel Reece.
It will help if the Raiders can get a decent return or two against the Chargers struggling kickoff coverage. Jacoby Ford had the first kickoff return to put the Raiders in opposition territory in what seemed like a decade. Maybe he can be half as good as Leon Washington was against the Chargers and take one to the house.
142 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sooooo now just to sound like the Raiders are gonna win
it has to be written in story format that seems very fictional? Pirates vs the lightening? I’m a Chiefs fan and i’m not trying to be rude or anything I was just curious, before the year started all i could read from Raiders fans is how Oakland was gonna be on top and Campbell was the man (of which i said was a terrible assumption). Now at 1-3 i guess that takes a little away from all of that banter. So my question is what happend?
The O Line happened.
As much as I love Grad, I believe Campbell is still better QB. But the line is horrible and Campbell just doesn’t have enough time to do what he does behind it. Grad does a better job making things happen on the move. At the moment, Grad is the better option for the team.
by TexasRaider20 on Oct 7, 2010 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
up first thing in the morning to (lamely) troll a raider blog
your life must be sad, doucher
by lchristmas on Oct 7, 2010 8:00 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Actually
I’m at work looking through NFL news I guess i don’t see the problem coming over here to ask that question? But i wouldn’t really expect much less of a response from a fan such as yourself.
if you honestly "don't see the problem"
of coming over here to rub our previous optimism in our faces, reference our poor record and ask what happened to all of our “banter,” then you are stupid as well as being a trolling dick.
but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you knew exactly what you were doing, so I guess you’re just a dick but not a stupid one. so bravo on that. go away.
by lchristmas on Oct 7, 2010 9:08 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Just because
You reacted in a defensive manor doesn’t make me a dick i simply asked what happend to what seemed to be so optimistic and why it hasn’t turned out that way.
lol, I sense panic. They know that this is their only opportunity to rub it in our faces especially-
since they are 3-0, but many are coming over to gloat because they know it is coming to an end. Colts and Texans will destroy them them.
Print that for Chiefs news.
The RaiderLaker
Only
someone drinking special kool-aid would believe we’d beat the Colts and Texans away thats just not very realistic… so really you have made no point? Even if we lose both games we will still be ahead of the Raiders? Print that in Raiders news…
Not really, lets say we beat the Chargers and the very dysfunctional 49ers....
we’ll be 3-3, you’ll be 3-2. same wins, technically not ahead. You are ahead now… but will it last? I’ll print this instead, for Raider news.
The RaiderLaker
Long season.
1-4 probably is out of the playoffs, but you have a good chance of taking that to, well, better than 11-5. It’s good that the Raiders host the Dolphins and Seahawks; I think they can win those games. Two division wins, and they’re where they were last year. Anything else, like a cross-town victory against the hapless ‘49ers or a win in Jacksonville, and you get back into the running (and degrade the Patriots’ pick).
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm very cool over here and always show respect to this blog
…but I will put money on we don’t go 0-2 over the next two weeks. Colts or Texans will fall mark my words.
Funny enough
I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re right. I wouldn’t pick the Chiefs in either game, but they’re a good upset team against good teams, and in a year like this with a generally soft schedule, that can yield a playoff berth. If you have two games, you only need 30% odds in both to have a better-than-even chance to win at least one.
I still don’t think they’ll win their division, but if they do win one of these games, a WC is a possibility.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes I agree
I know we will need all the wins we can get right now I would be comfortable that we would win the division or get a WC if we can go 4-1. That is saying we don’t have a Denver like implosion.
I am sorry to confuse you by putting the facts in more of a story format
but I think if you re-read the post a couple hundred times, you’ll see that that the answers to your questions lie in the above text. Had I known that we were going to have visitors such as you, Tmac1166, I would’ve used straight bullet points, less adjectives and referenced only espn.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Haha ok
Obviously we’ve started off on a wrong foot as my post was taken the wrong way… I’ll take blame for that but what i’m really interested in is what is the problem with the RAIDERS, not with what u think about my post. So let me clerify on a maybe less offensive post. Before the season started the talks were that the Raiders and Chiefs had gotten better while the Broncos had gave away their stars and the Chargers were getting old while losing stars of their own. Now i’m curious as to why it hasn’t worked out for the Raiders as of yet? picks not panning out, coordinators being unsatisfactory, etc. the only straight answer i’ve gotten so far is from TexasRaider20 about the O-line.. is that the midst of the problem? because believe me i know a poor oline can set the tone for failure.
Well, as you saw the Raiders are 25th in adjusted sacks allowed rate
that should tell you everything you need to know about problems with the o-line. It was also pointed out that the Raiders are allowing 5.3 YPC. There is a lot of blame to go around and it is going to the coaches and the players. Also, as was mentioned, injuries haven’t helped either.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
So
Something u forsee as easy to fix or a long term thing that may take another year maybe two?
Oh, haven't you heard? They already fixed these problems. Thing of the past my almost trollish friend.
I think the Raiders can win in spite of these deficiencies. Despite what the record suggests, this is an improved team.
I expect the 5.3 number will decrease by year’s end. The run d is a work in progress and it is a young D. They have shown glimpses, but as in years past they have shown breakdowns that lead to huge plays. I don’t expect a top 10 run d or anything just not this bad.
The offensive line is likely what it is. The tackles suck. I expect LT rook Veldheer to get better as the season goes and hopefully LG Gallery can come back and stay healthy.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2010 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Lol
If i weren’t a Chiefs fan and this wasn’t a Raiders post i would ask why the whole name calling but hey all in good fun and some of these things i do not know for the fact that i don’t typically research much on the raiders i didn’t know they were doing that poorly on run D as i remember the raiders D was always the stronger point of the team and apparently its taken a step backwards? and i don’t disagree that you’ve gotten better take it from a chiefs fan (but not a lions fan) being at the top of the draft year after year eventually you’re bound to get better
Oh Tmac1166, the thing is, the info about the run d
was in the original post that you responded too. Your failing to see that and instead take the tone that you did is what holds the troll like qualities. Hence any name calling you may have received.
No one expects you to be a Raiders aficionado but I’d at least expect you read the whole article before negatively responding to it. And if you don’t, that’s fine too, but don’t be surprised or act superior when someone calls you a troll.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately i quit reading
it because of the “story like” way it was projected. You’re right i should have read it all but that is the reason i did not. So i thank you for your answers even though it was stated above.
+ 1
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
great move to release jay alford this week
also, I hope john herrera or sanjay lal or whoever is calling the d-signals this week is reading this blog again…. need to put nnam on gates and let routt, huff, cj deal with the malcom buster naanees.
pressure on rivers with nnam on gates will lead to an ineffective game from the noodlearmed crybaby. I will not be able to stand another afternoon of his paper-airplane like tosses destroying us around the coliseum.
surprisingly, despite the awful o-line play, our defense has suddenly become the problem. we can score 20 — 24 points on anybody with grad. put it all together ONE TIME and we can win this week.
COME ON GIVE ME A REASON TO BELIEVE
by lchristmas on Oct 7, 2010 7:57 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I have hope.
Last year, the Raiders seemed to show up and battle it out against the better teams in the league. They almost beat SD week 1 last year…and probably should have.
I got to watch the Houston on NFL Replay last night. I cam away more encouraged than discouraged. Maybe it’s because I already new the outcome, so there was no letdown in that regard. I was mostly happy with what I saw from the offense, minus the pass protection. It’s the obivous mistakes that are killing us. The 3 turnovers were more than the difference in the game.
I’m not going to call this a “good” team yet. Good teams don’t turn the ball over 3 times against Houston. And good teams don’t tackle as poorly as they did on Sunday. But this team definitely has the potential to be good. They just need to get their head straight and play up to potential in all aspects of the game.
They only had 2 penalties for 23 yards last week. Quite frankly, that’s unheard of for a Raider team. But it’s awesome. If they can make the same strides in the other aspects of the game, they can be a competitor. They don’t have to be an elite team to when, but they can’t kill themselves.
As bad as the start has been. A win this week could possible land us tied for second place in the West depending the DEN/BAL game, which I expect DEN to lose. Considering all that’s happened, we will actually in pretty good shape if we pull this off.
Jamarcus actually played well that day.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Inconsistent would be a kind way to describe his performance
…not “well”. Although he made a nice TD pass, he missed a number of wide open WRs. The Raiders could have easily had 14 more points if JR had anything resembling accuracy.
We better win this one
We were one BS non-TD away from beating them last year with that (string of expletives) at QB. If we lose I will demand a total elimination of the whole coaching staff. Man I feel so much better now. Maybe we can take out their remaining players with some hard nosed playing like last year (first game, in case you were wondering). In any case I just want a win no matter how bad it looks.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
What is the we talk about ending the streak coming from Sam Williams?
Is he going to be passing around water during the game? I just have to say good luck team…
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 7, 2010 9:51 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
He has a point. This isn't Bill v. Patriots, where the Pats have won 19 out of 20 games, in the series,
because of a disparity in talent. The Chargers may have a slightly better team, the Raiders have caught up to them in talent, now if they execute PROPERLY, they will be beat San Diego. It’s against the a Division Rival, at home. We need this game. The Raiders will not lose. I would bet my 2 balls, that’s how confident I am in their fire.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions
No disparity of talent...?
You can’t really mean that, can you? I love the Raiders, but that doesn’t mean that I’m blind.
The Chargers are better across the board on the OL, for instance. You really can’t compare the WR’s; theirs have actually caught the ball and amassed yards, where ours may have some talent but have nothing to show for it yet. As much of a whiner that he is, how many GM’s or HC’s in the league would really swap Rivers for Gradkowski? Yeah, I like our defensive line, but the production has been spotty. Their LB’s are more productive, and so far, with the exception of Asomugha, their DB’s and S’s have been better.
That isn’t to say that they have underachieved mightily: they are currently ranked first with both their offense and defense, and are only 2-2.
This is still a winnable game, but let’s not kid ourselves that the rosters are essentially even.
Failure builds character; success reveals it
Dude, I'm the one who's most critical of our Wr's if you read my posts, the Raiders have talent
on the defensive side of the ball to match the Chargers, offensively the Chargers have the advantage at OL, QB, TE and WR.
The talent is there for the Raiders. The only difference is consistency. Every team has talent, the playoff teams are talented.
Don’t get things twitsted, the most dangerous animal is a wounded animal, I’m going to keep saying this until game day, I think the Raiders intensity in this game will be higher than San Diego’s, they need this game bad.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
The Raiders have talent on defense
More than they have had for some time, but it is not at the same level as San Diego’s, and if you truly believe that it is, then you are not seeing straight, but through the eyes of a homer.
The Raiders do play with more intensity against SD, but that won’t be enough by itself; they need to improve the playcalling, tighten up the run defense, do less to hurt themselves with penalties and turnovers, and not only get something out of the special teams but capitalize on it as well.
That they “need” the game doesn’t matter; what matters is how they play the game.
Failure builds character; success reveals it
Dude, please, the Raiders talent is just as streamlined as the Chargers, c'mon, bro,
Every team from Arizona to Washington, has the talent, the space between a great team and a bad team is very thin, very thin. Let me give you an example. Do you think the difference between the Raiders and Chargers is talent, you’d be dead wrong, if it was about talent they would have manhandled Kansas City and Seattle. Instead they lost. I’ve said before, internal factors have as much, actually more influence in the Raiders case, than talent.
There’s been more dysfunction in our ‘84 Super Bowl team than the situation now. I’m not sweating these ‘talent’ conversations. Alabama has ready NFL talent on it’s teams, does that mean it would be beat the Chargers or Raiders, I don’t know. The discriminations between great teams and terrible teams is slight. Ask the Dolphins, who won 1 game, next year made the playoffs. I could go on, I’m bored in this line of thinking. Peace, my friend.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Uh... Go down the Chargers' starting roster and find me two replacement-level players.
That GM is the best judge of horseflesh you’ll ever see. His first-rounders aren’t all studs, but everybody on that team is average at a minimum. Ask any Chargers player who they think AJ should replace immediately, and you’ll get a couple complaints about how overpaid Sproles is, or about the injuries at linebacker, and how good it is to have such excellent depth. Most fans will shrug and tell you the whole damn team is just sizzlingly awesome, or that maybe a little more discipline on Special Teams would be nice.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
The Chargers DID manhandle KC and Seattle
Special teams blew 3 kick returns and KC had one long run. Other than that, it was total domination on both sides of the ball. The Chargers are number one in the league in offense and defense. I’m no genius, but I would consider that domination.
They manhandled KC so bad they lost.. lol
You are joking right? You had first and goal to win and our D put you down and ST helped get good field advantage and score 7. Then Charles broke a big run our your run D and that’s all she wrote. Don’t discredit our win because your bitter you came to our house and left w/ a L simple as that.
OK
I’ll take Phillip Rivers or a dog turd for $300 Alex
There isn’t any player on their roster they wouldn’t trade for Rivers.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
A win is a win.
But your offense is horrible. Your defense also plays well against elite offenses when there’s a monsoon. There are three phases in football and the Chargers Special Teams weren’t ready for the season in September, again. ST can and will be fixed. If last week is any indication, it looks like it already has been fixed.
The point is, the Chargers look better than they have on both sides of the ball than they have in some time. This is bad news for a young Chiefs team who have a lousy quarterback and a one dimensional offense trying to make a playoff run in the same division as the Chargers. I’m just saying that might just want to temper your enthusiasm before you suffer the same fate as Bronco fans that last two years.
2-2 domination? Ugh...no...that's not domination...4-0 with 3 blowout victories...
is domination.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions
The Chargers had a rush of fumblitis and wrong-lane syndrome.
They’re easily the best O+D in the NFL, but the game is played on O+D+ST. If the ST TDs hadn’t happened, the Chargers would be 4-0 with 2 blowout victories. Of course, they did… and the real question is if the Chargers have fixed their two problems.
1) Offensive Turnovers. Last year, they lost 7 fumbles (out of 14) and threw 10 ints (9 from the PR Machine, 1 from Volek). This year, Rivers has 4 ints already, and the team has lost 6 fumbles (out of 8). We knew the number of fumbles would go up, because LT is good at ball control, but this says “outlier” to me. Only Sproles had a rep as a fumbler going into the year.
2) Special Teams. The Bolts have faced four of the top return teams in the NFL, and have been gashed three times, for two losses (and a blowout win… ST isn’t everything). They have taken reasonable steps to correct this. If their ST return to average, just average, they’ll be a juggernaut.
Otherwise, they’re better than ever. The run game and pass defense (rush and coverage) are radically better than the ‘08 or ’09 teams, and the passing offense is radically better than the ’06 or ’07 teams. I’m not using that “Radically” term lightly. If the turnovers and ST whiffs stop, the Chargers are far and away the best team in the AFC, and maybe the whole league.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, and the run-D is better than '07 or '09
And probably better than ’08.
Not ’06-like, though. But the coverage is a lot better….
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Not really, no doubt your O is elite. But the D is long ways from being elite
Ravens, Pitt, and Jets are Elite D’s.
The RaiderLaker
Watch.
Just keep on watching. The pass rush is decent with Applewhite and Phillips (English is a backup and run-stuffer), but with Merriman coming back to full health, there will be a lot going on. The ILB squad is thin, but good.
I’m slightly concerned about missing Steve Gregory’s savvy against New England, but Paul Oliver (hey, two guys with two first names) is stronger and faster, even if he lacks the instincts. And I’m not at all sure that he does lack the instincts anymore. Otherwise, the secondary is better than it’s been in a very long time. FS Eric Weddle isn’t the most athletic, but he seldom makes mistakes and likes to lay big hits. Jammer is cool and steady, and already Cason has demonstrated that he’s better than Cromartie.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Look at the stats
Ravens, Pitt, and the Jest have given up more yards than the Chargers so far this year.
But then again... they are in really strong divisions...
You played KC, Seahawks, the Cards…. Jax was somewhat legit though, they are good. but that’s the only “strong” team, maybe even “playoff” team you have played.
The RaiderLaker
And we rolled them up and smoked them.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 8, 2010 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I think the Chargers' defense has done exactly what it's supposed to.
Special teams, fumbles, and red-zone offense have been problems. But the bad QBs the Chargers have faced have all failed, and mostly failed miserably. The defense is giving up one TD per game, and not one of those scores came on a long drive. In fact, the Cards settled for a garbage-time FG, because by that point they were proud of finally having gotten into scoring position.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 8, 2010 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Shameful ... how the Cards have fallen
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 8, 2010 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Domination doesn't require big score differential. The Raiders of yesteryears
dominated physically when “just win, baby” meant something. We were considered dominant b/c they were carrying opponents off the field every quarter and we won 3 out of 4.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions
And this is the domination I want back.
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions
The difference isn't "very, very thin"
The diference between the Saints, or the Colts, or Patriots, compared to a team like Oakland, or Jacksonville, or Detroit, is paper-thin? Dude, you can believe that if you wnat, but it really ain’t true. Sure, every team has talent, but some have a shitload more than others, and it shows in more ways than one.
First, generally speaking, the best teams have the best evaluators of talent, and it is spread more evenly across the entire roster, as opposed to crappy teams, whose talent is much thinner in vital spots, because they can’t find better players.
Second, the coaches take that better overall talent and make it fit into a scheme that takes advantage of the talent, that allows the player to maximize their particular skill sets, where poor teams try to jam players into a system that doesn’t fit them, wasting their skill sets.
Third, the play on the field is reflective of the first two, and also of the player. Teams that consistently hurt themselves with penalties and mental mistakes are, more often than not, undisciplined, which is all too often an indicator of unrealized talent. The players are not disciplined, and generally speaking, discipline is required to elevate one’s game above ‘just physically talented’ to the level needed to really succeed.
No, the Chargers have more talent across the board than either of the two teams that they have lost to, but there are two things to realize: one, that any team can win on a given day, and second, that the end of the season will say a lot more about those three teams than any single game. Anyone that’s played sports knows that a more talented team can lose, but it isn’t the way to bet, nor would that generally speak to the entire season.
Let me use Raider history as an example: The Raiders lost to the then St Louis Cardinals in 1983, 34-24, at home. Would this mean that the 8-7-1 Cardinals were a better team than the Raiders, who went 12-4, and won the Super Bowl?
Failure builds character; success reveals it
I respect your optomism RIP but I hope you aren't going to be using your balls for anything anytime soon.
That is a bad bet, not that I know anyone that would want your balls in a bet to begin with.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
I don't think so, it's a division game at home, must win to save season, the most dangerous
animal is a wounded animal, the Raiders are very wounded, I would bet that San Diego’s in for a fight, bro, you can believe that. For all the shit that’s said about them, they’re pros and have pride. I think the Raiders win this game.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
The Chargers are a bad run defense team, technically we're worse, I know the team can
band-aid it’s problems for a week and get a win, I would bet my house on this game, if that’s something you need TAW.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions
I wish I was as confident as you were.
I’ve seen this team take a punch in the mouth and not even try to hit back for far too long. Until they punch back I am not convinced.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
TAW, don't blame ya one bit for that, just keep in mind, the most dangerous animal
is the most wounded animal. If I were the Chargers, I’d get ready for the Raiders best shot.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm sure they are.
The Bolts get up for Raider Week like they get up for December games. They know they will get the two best shots the Raiders have every year, just like they get everybody’s best shot every December, and they can’t afford to drop the streak.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Again
as a chiefs fan i will be rooting for you guys to destroy the Chargers and i cannot believe i’m saying this at all
That's your best chance
The Chargers have the number one offense and defense in football. They picked up a few guys and are having some veterans help on on ST. The season is far from over. Your defense is improved but your offense is too one dimensional. Aside from one long run, you couldn’t do anything vs. the Chargers on Monday night. Enjoy your lead on the division while you still have it. And go Colts.
Alot of games are decided by 1 or 2 plays
We made the plays that night and the next week and the 49ers got killed god bless their souls. You will have your chance to get beat us in your house. Please quit acting like it was lucky we beat you it’s annoying you got beat-stomped no-beat yes. Also who cares who scored what we obviously did enough to be 3-0. According to you we must be great because we beat SD the team that Jesus built right?
I don't think it was an unearned win.
But I’m with SDreal in that you better pad your lead now.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
We are...
I don’t care though because were building and were 3-0, your built.If we pulled a Denver although it would be saddening I would be ok with that we have ALOT of young and upcoming stars and we will only get better. I think the Chargers had their chance and didn’t take it. The Chiefs will only get better that’s something the Chargers can’t say.
Watch. You'll be surprised.
There is no judge of horseflesh like AJ Smith. He’ll have two 2nds and two 3rds, plus the rights to VJax. This team will win 11±3 games every year until either Rivers retires, or a year after Smith retires/dies.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions
AJ Smith is a joke
and yes when Rivers get old or retires or gets hurt the Chargers automatically lose 6+ more games a year. Just don’t think you will be as good as years before even with Rivers.
What evidence do you have for that?
How many teams can whiff a first-round pick and then find a starter-quality UDFA in the same year? AJ has done it twice… on two of his only three first-round whiffs out of nine picks. And those two “whiffs” are still backups at their original drafted position.
How many UDFA pro-bowlers on your team? Antonio Gates, Kris Dielman, Malcom Floyd, Brandyn Dombrowski, Shaun Phillips, Steve Gregory… none of those guys was drafted. How many teams with a franchise LT would be okay dropping him for a third-year UDFA who’d started two different positions on the right side for about ten games? And they were totally right; in 3 of 4 games, Brandyn Dombrowski has been dominant; so dominant in the first two, in fact, that Marcus McNeill came back with his tail between his legs and took an 87% paycut.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions
You're right.
When Brees left San Diego, AJ Smith is so horrible, he just ran into a corner and hid. That’s the stupidest thing I’ve heard. Yeah, and when P. Manning leaves the Colts they’re going to suck too… unless they find someone to replace him. Who doesn’t know this?
All you’re saying is that the Chargers have an elite QB. The entire NFL already knows this. And everyone knows KC’s QB sucks which is why we know they will fold as the season moves on.
Al Davis
needs to quit straightjacketing his coaches.
And the coaches need to adjust and disrupt faster.
I can't seem to figure this out.
Let’s assume I’m Cable, or any coach on the staff for that matter. If I’m sticking to Al guidelines, and losing, I’m going to get fired.
If I’m capable of doing what I was hired to do and winning, I’m going to get fired for not following directions.
I think I would rather just win and get fired.
What’s Al going to do? Pull out the overhead projector at a press conference as say “We fired Coach Cable for insubordination. He was winning and took us to the playoffs when he had clear written and verbal instructions not to do so.”
His job is on the line either way. Win the damn ballgame.
by TexasRaider20 on Oct 7, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't understand it either TexasRaider20.
He is being a yes man through and through however he needs to recognize all the yes men before him ended up getting fired anyway when they couldn’t get the job done. He has completely regressed as a coach since last season when he decided to do things his way. I’m talking abour Marshall as well. This team will never get out of the doldrums, much less have a winning record using the status quo.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
the most dangerous animal is a wounded animal. They're in bad shape, I'll take the Raiders
over the Chargers in a five yard cloud of dust game.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I've said for several years that I don't think the raiders will return to anything close to greatness until Al is gone.
I got nervous this year when they finally gave up on fat ass (good for Raiders, bad for the rest of us). I thought they were making decisions that made sense to improve the team. As opposed to dragging things out because The Sweatsuit couldn’t admit that, perhaps, he missed on a draft pick. As a Chiefs fan I’m all for Al living as long as possible. With most division games, Chiefs/Raiders especially, the records don’t mean shit. It’s going to be a tough game, hard hits, perhaps some off color comments, maybe a cheap shot, but it will be a fun game to watch. I thought the Raiders had made some progress this year, but you can’t prepare for injuries. I will NOT be rooting for the Raiders to win this week(it’s against the law here in the Midwest), I will however, be rooting for the Chargers to lose
LOOKIN FORWARD TO IT!
I always digg the Bolts-Raiders games. What a classic AFC rivalry. I know Oakland will come out scrapping, looking for blood, trying their damnedest to scrape a win from San Diego. And San Diego will do what they do, get massive yards, lots of pts. on the board, and possibly blow it at the last few seconds. As a Bolts fan, I enjoy watching the Raiders because the rivalry always makes for a good game. Anything can happen. I respect the Raiders squad, and hope to see a wicked game this weekend. Charger fans know more than anyone, never underestimate those dang Raiders!
Love it, man, much respect, thanks for the encouraging words, you the know this power the rivalry has.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
The Raiders beat the hell out of the Chargers
last year on MNF, even though we won the game. You can always throw the records out when these two teams play. It’s always been that way.
In 2002, we still sucked but we beat you in overtime with a TD run by LT. I was getting married that day and for literally a half hour no one could find my dad for pictures. He was in his car the whole time, listening to the game on the radio.
It's Chargers/Raiders Week...
previous records and current standings don’t matter. Both teams get up for each other. Always have, always will.
This game is going to surprise people. The Raiders are better than their record, and so are the Chargers.
Chiefs are going down this season
Chiefs got off to a lucky start against SD, playing in a freakin’ monsoon. San Diegans dont have weather down here! Never rains! Its like our kryptonite! I’d be willing to wager a steak dinner that San Diego’s record will be BETTER than KC’s tho at the end of the season.
So you'll be flying in to Wichita next Feb
Take a rental car up Ridge Road to 21st St then it’s not far to my house. MMMM I can taste that juicy steak already…
[The Kansas City Chiefs] are now a team that knows how to win. The power that was unleashed in that last stand (Chargers wk 1) is a rare thing. Teams spend tons of money in search of it, but it can only be found in the collective conciousness created by team builders.
--Aiken_Drum
Twitter: @GiftNate
by giftedchiefsfan on Oct 7, 2010 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions
This is a Raiders blog. You two can compare nails on your own blogs.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 7, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm sorry. He just set himself up.
Truthfully, the Chargers are very beatable. It takes team speed, winning the field position battles, tough defense and a great rushing offense. Raiders are capable of doing it.
Rivers had an insane amount of passing against the Chiefs. I don’t think the monsoon affected his game at all. If the Raiders can win the other statistical battles, Rivers can do what he wants and the game is still within reach for the black and silver.
[The Kansas City Chiefs] are now a team that knows how to win. The power that was unleashed in that last stand (Chargers wk 1) is a rare thing. Teams spend tons of money in search of it, but it can only be found in the collective conciousness created by team builders.
--Aiken_Drum
Twitter: @GiftNate
by giftedchiefsfan on Oct 7, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
oh and double team Gates
[The Kansas City Chiefs] are now a team that knows how to win. The power that was unleashed in that last stand (Chargers wk 1) is a rare thing. Teams spend tons of money in search of it, but it can only be found in the collective conciousness created by team builders.
--Aiken_Drum
Twitter: @GiftNate
by giftedchiefsfan on Oct 7, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions
that is a must.
I like to believe that my best hits border on felonious assault.
-Jack Tatum
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER D GOAT on Oct 7, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions
The Chargers are beatable if they give up kick returns.
They have both the best offense and defense in the NFL right now. The Chargers picked up a few guys specifically for ST and a few vets played last week and that looks like it helped. ST doesn’t look to be a problem moving forward.
The Chiefs on the other hand, aside from one long run, gave one of the most pathetic offensive performances I’ve ever seen from a professional team on MNF. Well, then again… so did the Jags… and the Seahawks… and Arizona, so there appears to be a pattern there.
Blah Blah Blah
That terrible offensive show did enough to win. Hell yeah the ST helped and The D was great, but hey man it’s a football TEAM. That’s why 52 and Rivers will never do shit and you guys won’t win a Superbowl. You can make all the excuses in the world and that game will never switch to a W on your schedule. You got pounded you guys had 1st and goal to win with that awesome offense you have . The rain didn’t seem to bother Mccluster as he blew right by you to the end zone? I will state again Fuck the Chargers! Cry like Rivers did that night on national television, go ahead how did it work for him?
You didn't say anything that contradicted what he said.
FWIW, I think the Chiefs have a really cool D and ST. As long as the run game holds up, they’ll win most of their home games, and beat bad teams on the road. This year, that can get to 10-6.
But the truth is, the Chiefs got a long TD break, a TD off a fumble returned to the red zone, and a punt return for a TD. It’s not a hostile statement or anything to say that the offense failed, but the D and ST did enough to salvage a win anyway. Without either the strip, the runback, or the stop at the goal line, KC would have needed some added miracle to go along with the rainstorm. All of that except the rainstorm was engineered by the KC team, just not by the offense. So yeah, give credit where it’s due, and not where it’s not.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I know
You said:But the truth is, the Chiefs got a long TD break, a TD off a fumble returned to the red zone, and a punt return for a TD. but the D and ST did enough to salvage a win anyway. Without either the strip, the runback, or the stop at the goal line, KC would have needed some added miracle to go along with the rainstorm
That sounds like we beat you ya know?If it wasn’t for ABCDEFG we could have won. Sounds like an excuse defense won us the game along with special teams happens all the time. Ask the Bears they made the Superbowl with it.
Of course you beat us.
And if you had a little class, you’d act like you’d done it before.
Especially here.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Just tired of excuse this and excuse that
Taking shots personally and then speaking about class bravo. Also of course we beat you before and we will again. I don’t like the Chargers and think they are not as good as the picture they paint. You came into Arrowhead didn’t play better then we did and then make excuses and it’s crap.
I'm not making excuses.
You’re reading that into what I said, because you’re a hater: It’s not actually there.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions
should have stopped here..
The Chargers are beatable
Every team is beatable
There are no excuses, the Chargers lost the game. My point is that you can’t count on a rainstorm, 300+ yards of kick returns, and a 70 yard TD run every week to win.
by SDreal on Oct 8, 2010 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
hey SD sucks
KC won get over it and I hope SD gets blown out by the Raiders. Tired of complaining the rain I’m melting blah blah blah shut up you lost and even if somehow you do finish better then the Chiefs you will choke in the playoffs so get over yourself.
we have done it too plenty ask the Colts
You are nothing your Franchise is garbage and you been good lately and choke in the playoffs. Times are changing and it’s going to be the Chiefs you fear in the division. We already beat you once this year bet we do it again. I fucking hate the Chargers and they are on the decline anyway you have a 50% chance of winning the division still but will choke in the playoffs and after that your run is done and the Chargers are back to scum. You act like the Chiefs sucked so long. Three maybe four years before that we were going 9-7/10-6/13-3 but nothing to show for it. You guys know how that feels right dolt’s fan?
I'm cheering you on guys....
I hate the Bolts and think you can do this. Here’s the deal in all honesty your backed against the wall and have nowhere to go. Do you A kick the Shit out of Rivers and storm back into the AFC West race or put the gun in your mouth and blow your 2010 season brains all over the wall? The choice is yours lol just don’t let Jano kick anything game winning as he is being paid by the underwear gnomes.
This is it for us; all or none.
There are no two ways about it. Put up or shut up.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Games blacked out again...
WTF… I’ll be there anyway, but it just sucks when your team can’t fill a stadium cause we stink right now
aka GOLDENBOYWARRIOR
by gogomaplata on Oct 7, 2010 3:54 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
You guys are better then record states..
Too many self inflicted gun shot wounds let’s just hope this week it’s not to the head.
LOL!!!
Kansas City you make me laugh soo fucking hard, WHAT FUCKING PART OF THE CHARGERS DECLINED, special teams did, which ur shitty stupid fucking team that i wouldnt touch with ten foot pole took advantage of. chargers are either fixing or have the problem solved now. lets see who gets the last laugh though in december when ur team gets raped and the chargers go to the playoffs, where I admit we will probably selfdestruct like we usually do, but hey, we denied the playoffs to u morons. peace
Until December your 0-1 against us buddy
After that you’ll be 0-2 and don’t bring up previous years because it’s the past it does nothing but soften your tears when you go 0-2 in the division and 0-2 vs the Chiefs. Not 100% sure but LT has done fine for me in my fantasy league and how’s Matthews or he was injured already by who you say oh the Chiefs when? OH when he fumbled that’s right now I remember go to hell and take Phillip Rivers with you then you will be 1-15 because it’s Rivers and 52 other guys.
STOP MAKING LAUGH
Man kansas city is really cute, acting like his team is da shit. I think you are embarrassing the raiders by supporting them than anything else. Fine by me.
Shut the f up
We beat you and you make excuses just saying I think the Raiders expose you as well. F U and the Chargers and go to hell. You said I was cute? Ok that’s why you act like you do
Phillip Rivers Camel Toe?
“Ugh…I am so tired of this weakness being as obvious as Philip Rivers’ Camel Toe.”
The dude played in a game against the Pats only 5 days after having his knee scoped. He talks a lot of smack, he’s a yacker, but question his manhood? Seriously dude, grow a pair yourself first before you call out this dude.
And I agree with the poster above who said if in the first game you guys would have had any other QB that Jamarcus you would have won. That was a brutal game.
by JYBaritone on Oct 7, 2010 5:51 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Really, man. Hate him if you want, but that guy has balls of steel.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 7, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely hate him.
Respect his talent, yes, but can’t stand him for his jabbering and whining and pointing fingers when things go south.
He’s a shadow of Drew Brees, and always will be. I will give you toughness, but the guy’s a douche.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Bill Romanowski made a good point this week previewing the game.
He said the team is playing soft. He wants to see Phillip Rivers bitching at his teammates. I wish we played with a sense of urgency and registered some sort of a pass rush but when you’re giving up 5.3 yards per carry I highly doubt we are going to frustrate him at all.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
by TAW on Oct 8, 2010 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Raiders
We’ve always had problems playing physical teams. However this year I get the impression the Chargers are much tougher in the trenchnes. I look forward to watching the Chargers run over the Raiders. Tolbert is a beast, remember his name. It’ll be called out a lot.
"Always had problems playing physical teams"????
Clearly your memory or knowledge doesn’t stretch back at all…
You should probably rephrase that to “Reciently had trouble playing physical teams”…
But then, we beat the Stealers in PITSBURGH last year so meaybe it should be:
“Sometimes have trouble playing physical teams”… BU\ut then every team does that now and again…
Hmm maybe if people stop quoting an ex coach who has no relivence….
by KiwiRaiderFan on Oct 7, 2010 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
He's speaking on behalf of StD and was addressing us
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2010 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Recently, and recently before that, and recently before that, going back a lot of years.
Yes, I remember a day when we feared the Raiders, but that’s a distant memory. In the PR era, we’ve dropped two to the Broncos and three to the Chiefs. In the Brees era, they both knocked us out of the playoffs. To remember the Raiders, a Charger fan has to go back to the days of Doug Flutie, and we’ve had two elite QBs since then.
Beating the Steelers in Pittsburgh was a nice accomplishment. Nobody should ever take any NFL team lightly. But I might note that the Steelers were 16th in the NFL in rushing average last year and gave up the second-most sacks. Physical? On offense? Not really. They were kind of a finesse offense last year.
The Steelers had a nice and physical defense, which matters when facing really good offensive teams. But we’re talking about the Raiders here: a bad opposing offense really diminishes the power of that defense or home-field to skew the odds.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 8, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Not that their run game didn't kick our butts
But the Chargers were reeling in the wake of the beat-down they took in Week 1. Beating the Raiders cost three games. But it was worth it.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 8, 2010 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions
It was our solace leaving you wounded with your women and children lamenting
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 8, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions
You gotta love Charger Week!
The rivalry is so awesome that Chiefs fans had to come over to try and catch a piece of it!
Lord loves a workin' man; don't trust whitey; see a doctor and get rid of it.
Ya know that's true
Once again, awesome writeup. My only dispute would be calling Sam Williams a linebacker.
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Oct 8, 2010 6:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Something is SERIOUSLY wrong with the world when us Oakland Raider fans are the classy ones in the situation.
2012 really IS the Armageddon. :-(
KC are so pumped they actually beat the Chargers
that they have to follow them around all season trolling… even on their opponents blogs. I can’t wait until the December game against them. It will be total destruction.
Actually, you guys have all been great on this blog… so far. Noontide has been a good sport about inviting us over on the SD blog. As I fan, I’m not going to take the Raiders lightly. This would make your season to beat us at home and/or take out some key Charger players via injury.
I lived in Berkeley/Oakland during the Ryan Leaf era. Talk about depressing. I’ll take annual playoff choke jobs over Leaf at QB every single season. At least we’re winning some games.
That's pretty much the only way.
That or run back a couple kicks.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Oct 8, 2010 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Sam Williams doesn;t deserve to be quoted
he’s one of the most irrelevant Raiders in all of history. He is only on the team because Al likes how he looks in a jockstrap. There’s no other expkanation. He sucks at everything and even when completely desperate at LB the hapless coaches don’t even consider him.
who gives a flying flapjack what the guy says? Any kid out of college can play special teams. Sam Williams is a charity case with no impact on the game.
new orleans saints Jerseys
http://www.sportsjerseysshop.com
Our website is persisting on best customer service. Please come and enjoy it!
We only provide AAA quality of products. You can make purchases without scrupulosity. All of products can be ordered from our website directly, also, you can contact our professional customer service to get more new orleans saints Jerseys about payment terms, the intention of cooperation etc. The most preferential price: Our competitive price make our customers confident to develop their own business, at the same time, reaping big benefit from this transaction. Our favor tends to the customers who are from United States, Britain, France, Spain, Germany and Australia etc.
aaa quality designer handbags
The way to distinguish Authentic/Clones Fendi Handbags
Achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly FFLOGO textured canvas bag is the aim to counterfeit objects. FFLOGO textured most of the
counterfeit goods all achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly is staring at FF textured series. Anyway, as long as textured strictly to
stitch count, the average person is difficult to distinguish authenticity. But, usually genuine achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly
in bespread FFLOGO textured on the canvas, not fixed-point appear straight to achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly, false words
written achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly is without it.
[Steel] Genuine Fendi Handbags achieve miraculous
Fendi repeatedly hardware buckles and zippers have clear and sensible FendiLOGO steel. False achieve miraculous Fendi
repeatedly general use is ordinary buckles and zipper, above will not have by itself.
[Metal shingle] Inside the Discount Fendi Handbags of
metal listing FLOGO, and go with producing area. General market saw on a false achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly without this
metal listing.
[Numbers] And genuine Gucci, as genuine achieve miraculous <a
href=“http://www.sexyladymarket.com”>Wholesale Fendi Handbags repeatedly lining will printed label straight
to FFLOGO and indicate the Numbers. False achieve miraculous Fendi repeatedly or no label, or tag coarsely, no check Numbers of
the name positively.

by 































