Seething Seers: Raiders-Chiefs Predictions
by Rich Langford on Nov 4, 2010 11:57 PM PDT
Email
PrintGather 'round Friends and Fellow Followers! For I bring kind words from the Wise One. First an update on how I came to get them.
RaiderDamus, aka the seer of all things awesome, made a killing on the World Series and while he said he was just gambling to get enough money back to reclaim his Sibyls from from the evil clutches of DeNiro and Pesci, he rode his hot streak right through the Raiders game.
Unlike past weeks, finding Damus was easy. He called me on my cell phone and then picked me up on his new yacht. Yup, that's right, he's on a boat, as they traded the cave for a yacht. As I boarded the yacht, I saw DeNiro, Pesci and Liotta sitting around in speedos and captain hat admiring a deck of sun bathing sibyls--the sibyls needed it too, a life spent huffing gas in a cave can leave one rather pale.
Then RaiderDamus emerged, with blood shot eyes and a white substance around his nose. "Don't worry about that," he assured me, "I am finding new ways to court the future." And a bright future it is:
This is a big week for the Raiders. Kansas City is a legit team, as much as it pains me to say, and the Raiders will have to fight hard to get the W. RaiderDamus has been deep in visions this week, but that might be from all the alcohol consumed due to the Giants winning the World Series. I am bleeding black this week, and all I have to do now is change Giants orange to Raider silver.
I seem to recall the Chiefs having drafted Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson. Whatever became of them? Apparently, Tamba Hali is KC's pass rush, which baffles me as I watched a lot of LSU games where Dorsey and Jackson were absolute monsters. How is it that they aren't relevant? Are they just miscast in KC's defense, or are they Ryan Sims-like busts? Anyway, the Chiefs' D-line isn't all that great, maybe a little better than the Seahawks', and their linebackers are so-so. The only guy on the Chiefs who scares me is Eric Berry. Eric Berry is a bad ass motherfucker. However, who knows how much he will play as a rookie. I suspect the Raiders will be able to balance the run and pass effectively enough to take advantage of the Chiefs' lack of superior personnel, just like last week. It sure was nice to see the Raiders put together two straight amazing weeks, both in play-calling and execution.
Jason Campbell will have an effective yet understated day. The Raiders will concentrate on the run, but so will the Chiefs, so I suspect play action will be a huge weapon this week for the Raiders. Campbell has 250 yards passing, 3 TDs, 1 pick.McFadden and Bush will combine for 220 yards rushing, including one long run busted by each of them. The Raiders' dominant offensive line will dominate in dominating fashion. Chiefs fans will cry into their cereal.The solid Raider D will have a tougher game this week, especially without Asomugha. McCluster, Jones, and Charles will all be effective. However, Matt Cassel will not. He will be sacked at least 5 times. Dwayne Bowe will catch one touchdown.Raiders win, 36-17.
Lil' Dam, who has to earn his way, was in charge of oiling up Pesci, but he still found time to give me his prediction.
This is going to be a game dominated by the defense and the running game so management of time is very important and Cable hasn't lately been good at this aspect of the game. Nevertheless McFadden is going to break for 50+ yarder at some point in the game. The Raiders D-line will dominate on pass plays but the Quiefs line will dominate in the run game until the second half. After a gritty game I see the score at 24-17 Raiders!!!
As always, tell us what you have seen the future to hold. Put your scores in bold!
235 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
you forgot
to include marcell reece whos become a huge weapon out of the backfield.
jacoby ford has a bigger day than dhb and i think nick miller will give us some decent field position
38-35 Raiders in OT
The unsung Raiders will have odes played throughout Raidershire come Sunday night
Reece, who is only now being recognized will be a major factor, as will Brandon Myers, a sleeper whose showed us some flashes (last season) of solid blocking and an ability to hang on while taking the hit. Jacoby is getting better fast and Nick Miller is a joker in the deck that has a real shot at making this week’s highlights.
Game planning in the absence of Nnamdi is critical; our RCB will be targeted now perceived as a vulnerability. Stanford must have the game of his career but I think he is ready. They all are ready.
Final score: Raider 27 Chiefs 13.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Every time they throw on Stan or Chris is a time they don't run it
I hope they let it change their game plan.
Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.
-The Rapist
by Rich Langford on Nov 6, 2010 2:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Raiders 22
Chiefs 17
- Dike McBush will again prove unstoppable.
- Jason continues unstoppable.
- Chiefs fans cry themselves to sleep after Jamaal leaves injured and Thomas stuffed.
- Zach Miller scores me hella fantasy points. (;
- ESPN all of a sudden loves us.
Hippy/Raider fanatic.
Zach has not praticed yet...
Not saying he is not going to play, But something might be wrong with him.
Something tells me, Jano is going to show up big in this Game !!!
And I think He’s going to be needed, in the First Half. We control ball in between the 20’s with Bush & McFadden, in come’s Jano, 3 To 5 times !!! Just feeling that way. With 7 and 8 man fronts, pressure Cassell & watch the gaps for cut back runs, against Charles & McCluster( those 2 lit’l MF’ers scare the hell out of me), Jones doesn’t !!! With enough of a lead, in the second half, they’ll be depending on Cassell, and that’s when we go in for the kill !!!! This game will be remeniscent of the Seattle game, Maybe 30-10 score, or real close. Another error free game from CAMPBELL will work Perfectly !!!
Ohhhh, one more thing !!! Special Teams has to be playing out of their heads, Especially the Kick-off teams, Back to Jano. Kick that shit out of the endzone, every motherfucking time !!!! This is Mandatory !!!
I agree on STs
Special Teams for sure has to have a stellar fucking game, the Chumps have 2 rookies that are very dangerous returners in Arenas and McCluster, living in SEC country I have watched them for a few years now, fucking dangerous little pricks, luckily McCluster is banged up with an ankle, hopefully that will at least slow/limit him if not a scratch.
NO MERCY!
by RAIDERSNOMERCY on Nov 6, 2010 5:50 AM PDT up reply actions
pulled together some stats...
these are some stats I pulled together from the last 2 weeks.
Total Offence-Raiders
3rd Down Efficiency 11/30-36%
Total Net Yards 1053-526 YPG
Red Zone Offence 6/10-60%
Goal To Good 6/8-75%
Time Of Pocession 74:43/120:00
Total Defence
3rd Down Efficiency 3/27-11%
Total Net Yards 405-202.5 YPG
Net Passing 283-141.5 YPG
Net Rushing 122-61 YPG
Red Zone Defence 1/4-25%
Goal To Good 0/1-0%
Sacks 12
INT 2
These are stats I have compiled from the last 2 games, which the raiders are playing their best ball all year needless to say. The offence we were all aware how well they have been looking(except 3rd downs) but our defence is the biggest X factor most people arent taking into account. Anaylist are looking at the whole Regular Season stats, and this D of the last 2 weeks isnt the same as the D from the majority of the season. The game plan is what we would expect, but to the level we succeed is more likely then some would give credit to. I will admit that the Rushing yards from the last 2 weeks werent from toped ranked rushing offences, so thats to be taken with a grain of salt, but the passing D is more realist with the “great” passing offence denver has, averaging out seattle’s. In other words, we should be instored for a good old fashioned, 60 minute game of hard nose defence, smash mouth football, and the team with more time of pocession and less turn overs is the likely winner. Should be instored for a great game!
Not only do we keep winning, we keep winning big
41-6, Raiders. Why stop crushing people now?
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
Why would I have to be high to assume a continuation of the past 2 weeks?
Especially considering it took OT for the chiefs to beat the flippin BILLS?
"God will understand. And if he does not understand, then he is not God, and we need not worry." -Orlando Bloom, Kingdom of Heaven
by angelesoterica on Nov 7, 2010 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Another post by noon
where he does no research. We are 8th against the rush. Glenn dorsey is a big reason why. 3 year development of linemen is the norm. dorsey in his third year you dont see the sacks etc cause he is a 3 4 d lineman. tyson jackson out after playing like a monster in the opener, last week first game back. watch out faiders.
Those weren't noon's words
They were mine, as RaiderDamus. I juat noticed that in the smacktalk thread all that was said about the Chiefs D-lkine was “Tamba Hali is awesome” but nobody said shit about Dorsey or Jackson. If they are doing as well as you say, bully for them. I wanted the Raiders to draft Dorsey, I’m a big SEC fan myself.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
No worries Dam. We can't expect outsiders to understand your gifts.
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
RD
you are right about dorsey and jackson prior to this year. they were both no shows last year especially for the price tag that comes for a 3 overall and a 5 overall. here in kc people were starting to call them busts, but this year(especially dorsey) they have been dominant in getting double teams and plugging holes.
good to know
I hope they destroy the rest of the league besides the Raiders.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
Thanks
I hope you guys beat up on everyone but us.
Don’t get me wrong, I hate your team. But these games are so much more fun when they mean something, aren’t they?
I for one am sick of people making jokes about this rivalry. Time to get it back to the top!
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I totally agree!
ESPN was going on and on Friday about how Chiefs-Raiders could be the biggest game of the weekend, even with Dolphins-Ravens- Bucs-Falcons, and Eagles-Colts on the docket. I am happy to see the AFC West in the spotlight.
One more thing about Dorsey and Jackson, if they’re just space-eaters and blocker-magnets, I feel it’s a waste of their talents. At LSU they were both big time bull rushing sack artists. Are you confident they are being used to the best of their ability in your scheme, or do you think they are miscast in your defense?
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
Dorsey/Jackson
In Romeo’s Defense they are being used perfectly. He doens’t expect a lot of sacks out of the front 3 and in a 3-4 defense you don’t see too many sacks out of the linemen. They might get better numbers in a 4-3 defense but it would be a wash since they are playing the 3-4 almost perfect.
Offical member of the Eric Berry Fan Club
Richard Seymour had 8 sacks as a 3-4 DE in his last year playing for NE, so saying you don’t see many sacks out of linemen in any system is false.
Hippy/Raider fanatic.
One year
Does not an argument make.
His average was about 4.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
It's tough to say at this point
Dorsey, despite having only a single sack so far this year, has actually been pushing the pocket quite a bit and providing pressure.
He’s also been absolutely awesome against the run. So while part of me wonders what he’d be like in a 4-3, he’s excellent for what we need and a very, very good
3-4 DE. So I’m not really interested in looking a gift horse in the mouth, know what I mean?
Jackson… well, he’s been much improved when healthy this year, so we’ll see. He’s been solid against the run, but hasn’t provided the push that Dorsey has…
Here’s how I see it- If they are making our overall defense a lot better (which Dorsey definitely is, and TJax is starting to), then I’m good with how they’re being used.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Hey look everybody, it's that guy that can't read again!
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions
hey look everybody. it's that guy that cant write an accurate thread.
I can understand bias noon, as we all drink kool-aid at AP, but our guys at AP are pretty accurate and most people in KC think this is going to be a hard fought game.
not like some raiders fans that think its a no contest
I mean come on. #1 rushing attack vs #2. Its going to be a game won in the trenches with penalties and/or turnovers deciding the outcome.
That's the thing, I haven't said anything inaccurate
hence the questioning of your reading skills or lack thereof. There have been no inaccuracies only your lack of comprehension.
And when it comes to RaiderDamus, you can say whatever you want about a missed stat or evaluation, but his title of as The Oracle has been amazingly well earned over the course of this season.
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Just like we'll give to his team on Sunday Night
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
27-24 Raiders
This is a close game. A missed FG by Succop will be the difference.
Also think 27 - 24 to us
But slightly disagree on the why. Close game with game winner from Seabass inside the last 2 to win.
Kick their ass and take their stuff!
by AllyRdr on Nov 5, 2010 5:37 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Because Jano
Would never miss a game winner…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Seems like a decent retort, but Jano has been 11 out of 12 field goals since AZ.
Jano had an epiphany after that choke and started coming in on Mondays (which he hadn’t done in 5 or 6 years) and has been working his tail off (according to reports) and spoke to the press afterward and told them he was deeply upset by what he had (hadn’t) done and would strive to ensure it never happened again, and so on, and so forth.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Rollin' til the wheels fall off
31-10 Raiders The Chiefs 4-15 on third down vs. the Bills without McCluster. Trend continues if he doesn’t play. If he does 31-21 5 sacks on Cassel.
Final Score 37-31
Raiders:
QB Jason Campbell: 15/22 250 yards 2 TD’s and 1 INT
RB Darren McFadden: 95 rushing yards, 80 receiving yards, 1 TD on a 50 yard screen
RB Michael Bush: 65 yards 1 TD on a 40 breakout run in the 3rd.
WR DHB: 70 yards
WR Jacoby Ford: 40 receiving and 20 rushing
WR Nick Miller: 50 yards 1 TD on a 35+ yard TD, 1 TD on a Punt Return
TE Zach Miller: 50 yards
K Jano: 3/4 FG
Defense: 5 Sacks, 2 FF, 2 INT -Mike Mitchell has a breakout game recording a Sack/FF and an INT. Seymour, Wimbley, Houston, Shaughnessy all get to Cassel. Michael Huff also picks off Cassel.
Chiefs
QB Matt Cassel: 11/23 160 yards 1 Fumble, 2 INT, 2 TD
RB Thomas Jones: 70 yards rushing
RB Jamaal Charles: 75 yards rushing, 40 yards receiving 1 TD
WR Dwayne Bow: 60 yards receiving 1 TD on a 35 yard pass
WR Dexter Mcluster DNP
TE Tony Moeaki: 50 yard receiving, 1 TD and 1 Fumble
Chiefs Defense: 2 Sacks, 1 FF, 1 INT Brandon Flowers has a good game stripping the ball out of DHB’s hands and picking Campbell off a tipped pass.
"When you believe in yourself......you will conquer many of your fears before they even manifest."
-Zen Master, Nnamdi "The Awesome One" Asomugha
This is comical
You guys lost to SF and Arizona and beat up 2 little guys and all of sudden you’re at the top of the world?
the better team lost those games obviously
Further, the Broncos weren’t little guys until we completely demoralized them and the Seahawks were one of the “rising” teams until we did the same. Take the arrowhead out of your butt and open your eyes.
"When you believe in yourself......you will conquer many of your fears before they even manifest."
-Zen Master, Nnamdi "The Awesome One" Asomugha
Also,
this is just for fun, the whole projections for the game. I think its either going to be an extremely low scoring or high scoring game. Given our offensive firepowers I sided with high scoring, with the Raiders edging out. I forgot to mention that when I was thinking this the Chiefs would have the ball at the end of the game and fail to punch it in for the victory.
"When you believe in yourself......you will conquer many of your fears before they even manifest."
-Zen Master, Nnamdi "The Awesome One" Asomugha
+1
“take the arrowhead out of ur butt”!!! LMAO!!!
by americaneagle510 on Nov 5, 2010 12:39 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
+ another 1
DarthDavis in rare form.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
What is comical is the fact you seem to continue trolling our site.
Is AP that boring you rather come over here and spew your two cents that equal jack? This is a Raider blog if you hadn’t noticed and while the team is only .500 this is the best they’ve played in years and we’re pumped. Get used to it.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions
I understand but you don't see posts from me on AP.
I am registered just in case. This is a prediction post anyway. I would be surprised to see kc wins predictions outweigh Oakland winning predictions here. You all shouldn’t either.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn't consider myself a troll by any means.
But, yes…sadly, there are trolls on both sides.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
I love it dude
I hate the raiders, i mean HATE the raiders. So do most all chiefs fans. I would have it no other way then the two of us competing for the west. the rivalry with these teams is epic.
wow
"There are two armpits in America. Oakland and New Jersey."- Warren Sapp
by Dustin SLO,CA on Nov 5, 2010 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions
If you really want to play that game
wins vs. teams with winning records:
OAK 1, KC 0
KC’s wins have come against SD, Cle, SF, BUF, Jac – the “best” team you’ve beaten is jacksonville ( a team that i cannot believe is 4-4, the 2 times I’ve watched them they looked like a high school team), and an underachieving sd team, and 3 of the dregs
records of defeated teams:
OAK 13-18
KC 11- 27 (!)
and all the sudden you’re “at the top of the world?”
I also love these two themes that have emerged:
1. “buffalo is not that bad, they aren’t the worst team in the league”
really? well, they certainly have possibly one of the worst defenses EVER:
in the last 5 games before they played KC: Buffalo gave up the following: 34, 38, 38, 36, 37
this team, that is “not that bad,” then held the vaunted chief attack, led by the best two back tandem since the invention of sliced bread, to 13 points in 75 minutes on their hallowed home turf
another:
2. “sure, you’ve won in 2 blowouts, but that was against 2 bad teams”
first, denver was by no means considered a terrible team until WE put them there. they beat tennessee at tennessee, and were coming off a loss to the supposed best team in football on a questionable pi call. sure, they look bad now, but who put them in that tailspin?
i also love the revisionist history that makes seattle a “little guy…” they were and still are leading their division with a winning record. granted, it is not a good division. however, we absolutely destroyed them. the 33-3 score does not do it justice. we had to settle for 4 field goals and could have scored more – but what was really impressive was our defense. i know seattle is not a great offense but against us they looked absolutely inept. they could not run, throw, or block. total yards in that game was 545-162.
and before you comprehension-challenged chief fans get on here with your “OMG YOU BEAT THE BRONCOS AND SEAHAWKS IT DOESNT MEAN YOU ARE GOING TO BEAT US” crap, that is not what I’m saying.
what I’m saying is that we are playing very, very good football right now. We will be playing before a stadium FULL of drunken, battery chucking parolees who have been waiting for this for a VERY long time. The team will be flying around and its a wave that i don’t think the chiefs will stop.
I see the chiefs ending up with good running numbers but not up to their average. charles will probably break one big run, maybe even 2, and he scares the shit out of me. however, i also see a lot of 0 and one yard stuffs. I don’t think cassel will make an impact in the passing game whatsoever. charles will go for 90 yards and a touch and jones will be held to 50-60. i hope haley doesnt pull his head out of his ass and give charles 25 carries like he should.
mcfadden will run wild again and reece will make an impact. i see a defensive score on a pick-6, possibly by huff or branch.
raiders 31-20.
by lchristmas on Nov 5, 2010 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Post the score in bold lchristmas :)
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
The opponents you've faced are a combined 25-28.
SOS is a really terrible argument to make because the Raiders SOS (to this point) isn’t much more impressive.
I still don’t see why you think your running game will explode all over us. I think the Chiefs have pretty much done everything they need to prove why they’re the 5th ranked in run defense. Holding all RBs we’ve faced under 100 yards is quite a feat.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
i bring it up to rebut the 1000 times i've seen the "your last 2 wins don't mean s**t because the teams you beat suck" theory
and because when you look at the chiefs’ schedule, they really haven’t beat a decent team all year. the schedules of both teams have been nondescript.
i think these 2 teams are very evenly matched. i think it will be a close game with a late score putting it away 31-20. I am not cocky, how could i be after the last 7 years. mcfadden is a different guy this year. he has shown an ability to run through and around people that is very rare. your run defense is good. i think he can beat it.
we will get to see if i’m right, been juiced for it all week, productivity be damned.
Why wouldn't you consider remaining competitive with Houston or Indy?
Last year, the Chiefs would have been smoked in those games. The mere fact we hung with Indy and really had a shot at beating Houston is very telling about the drive of the Chiefs. We’ve faced some pretty tough opponents. I guess that’s what I’m trying to say.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
We hung with Houston as well
but we’re not crowing about it or looking for moral victories, either.
Your wins are over SD, Cleveland, Buffalo, SF, Jacksonville (who was starting a guy fresh off the streets at QB.)
The two good teams you’ve played, you lost to. Our resume isn’t very flattering, either, but we’re not pointing to close losses as some sort of validation…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Nov 5, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes, let's take a look at our wins.
SD is statistically one of the best teams in the NFL. Their record doesn’t reflect that because they find ways to lose games. They aren’t a bad team. In fact, they’re a pretty good one.
Cleveland stunned the reigning SB champs in New Orleans. Are they REALLY that bad? Are you saying they got lucky? Or are the Saints overrated?
Buffalo took the Ravens to OT the week before. The Ravens. Let that sink in. One of the best defenses in the NFL was scorched for 500 yards against the team ranked dead last in offense.
The only thing scary about SF was Vernon Davis, Frank Gore, and their (at the time) 5th ranked run defense. We kept Davis in check, held Gore under 100 yards rushing, and picked apart their defense.
MJD was the main threat to the Chiefs. He was also held under 100 yards rushing.
If anything, this shows game to game different teams can show up. The Chiefs who demolished SF can show up Sunday. Or the Chiefs who struggled putting the Bills away can show up. Record ultimately matters, but even the worst teams in the NFL are going to give you their best shot.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Supreme, we beat SD also, and we all know Saints have a target on their backs.
Cleveland is garbage, they just played hard to give the fans something special in beating the SB champs and they are 2-5.
“Buffalo took the Ravens to blah- blah- blah.” Are you guys the Ravens? NO!
*We know San Fran is in a flux and were getting blown out by many teams, hell, even the Seahawks blew them out worse than you guys did and look what happened to them, we killed them.
The RaiderLaker
Read between the lines.
The type of team you face does not matter. The only thing which matters is the W/L column. Beat the teams you should and remain competitive with or defeat the teams who are statistically better than you. That is something the Chiefs have done all season.
I could sit here and nitpick all your wins and losses. In the end, it does not matter. It’s any given Sunday. We’re a competitive team who has faced some tough opponents. And every team in the NFL should be viewed as such.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
On the contrary, we mention our defeat to SF on a regular basis
That was our rock-bottom wake-up call to trash the "bend-don’t-break conservative mentality and start playing ball-out aggressive football, as you will see for yourself.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
"ball" in the singular so far, tomorrow though it will be plural
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Young teams aren't consistent
…..and the Chiefs have shown that. However, we’ve consistently been in EVERY game this year. This is going to be a great game tomorrow like every year we play each other. It’s ALWAYS a close and competitive game. I expect the Raiders to win, it’s being played in YOUR house. I’m hoping for a KC “W” but not holding my breath. It’s great though as fans to be a part of a rare Oak/KC game that’s important for a change. I hope our two teams are battling for the AFC West lead for every year to come!
SupremeChief... we remained competitive with the Texans also.
We have yet to see the Colts, but we will beat them unlike you.
The RaiderLaker
haha wow
raiders beating the colts? yeah, okay. the chiefs almost beat them but ultimately lost, what makes you think the raiders are going to have a shot at all against them? lol
Dexter McCluster for Rookie of the Year
2011 Chiefs Record Prediction: 8-8
Week 7 Adjusted Record Prediction: 11-5
____________________________
CHIEFS WILL
BELIEVE, BELIEVE, BELIEVE!
Please, JJ, allow me the honors? Thank you. Because, KC Nate, after
we treat the men who wear feathered hats as we have the men named after a four legged animal and a specie of bird it will be self-evident that have mastered the feathered men and bird teams and the four legged animal teams, e.g. also the Colts.
Q.E.D.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Just curious...
Can I count on you to be around after the game? It seems like you’re a contributor here, so I’m assuming you’ll be around.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
well you get to play Indy at home
We played them on the road and handled them defensively. Our youth and inexperience showed up though and lost the game for us, mostly Haley’s. 6 total FG’s, 4 for Indy and 3 for KC, and one late Indy TD. Held Manning in check all day. Watched him shaking his head the entire game because Crennel’s schemes and zone packages actually confused him for a rare change. Oakland better hope they can run because they will NOT be passing the ball with Campbell in. Dude sucks worse than Cassell.
We have a problem looking past the next game, far into the future for us is
4pm Sunday 11/7 (lucky number that).
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Seattle had the #2 rush D…..until they played us
by RyanTheRaider on Nov 5, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Well said Ich...
The Raiders completely changed the perception of both of the last teams. Hell, they knocked the Seahawks fans, who Tony Dungy called the best team in the NFC, into full fledged team loathing mode.
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Seattle
was 4-2 and leading their division, and had beat both AZ and SF…Seattle had been pretty stout against the run until they showed up in the Black Hole and got worn down by our OL.
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Nov 5, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
If you dont like OUR predictions in OUR prediction thread you can always make YOUR OWN on in AP.
no one said you had to read them.
Oh, oh. I didn't know there was an unwritten rule about opposing fans visiting different blogs and debating football.
-1 for Debbie Downers.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
didnt say it was a rule, i said if you dont like it you dont have to read it. You can make a post on your own site.
We have 3 threads debating with you guys. Why try to hijack everyone we post?
-1 for comprehension and illiteracy
Boohoo.
Why can’t you guys focus on football? Quit digressing, quit dodging. This is what football blogs are for. No more complaining. My original post was not a reply to you. If you want to produce a response that is ***football*** related feel free. I’m here to talk/debate about football. Sorry this hasn’t dawned on many of you yet.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Uruk Burry - as Mayock calls him
Has been outstanding in run support. He really is having a great year in that regard.
Early on, he was a liability against the pass, he couldn’t cover Antonio Gates, so we had to triple team him, etc.
But he is improving, even got a pic last week
Berry is......I don't know.
Hot and cold? He’s given up a few TDs in the beginning of the season but seems to have a better grasp on the game. There’s always room to improve.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
Raiders run D could be exposed
It’s easy to look good when playing with a lead against teams that can’t rush anyway. The Raiders will be in good shape if an early lead comes around…but if it turns into a tight battle, the Chiefs run offense is scary.
and our run offense isn't?
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Nov 5, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Bend but dont break
Chiefs may have good run numbers but will have trouble scoring. a sweep of AFC west coming Raiders 27 Chiefs 13
Chiefs 22-21
I have been wrong 4 weeks straight. I am hoping I am again this week. We should win this game but since its Chiefs-Raiders it is going to be ugly. While the Raiders’ wins have been works of art the Chiefs’ have not exactly been masterpieces. Again we should win but I’m not as confident about this one as last week.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
Exactly how do the Chiefs score 22? O_O
Seems like an odd score to me. Why not a two or three point win? That seems more likely.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
I think TAW is trying to jinx us. No way the Chiefs get a safety.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
Hm..now that you mention it.......
It seems quite plausible with Tambahawk.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
Actually that score has been posted in the past.
Failed 2-pt conversion attempt.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn't doubt the score has happened before. It's just odd to see.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
Not hard to figure out really
If you could do some grade 3 math. 5 field goals (not totally out of the question) plus a TD with XP.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Nov 5, 2010 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
If I have to explain this three different times in three different threads there's a problem.
“How often do you see teams score 22 points? My guess is not very often. Which was the point……….”
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
Way to take one for the team...
If this streak continues we may have to consider making you Anti-Dam!
Also, isn’t it obvious about his score? The Chiefs win on a last second two point conversion
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
How often do you see teams score 22 points? My guess is not very often.
Which was the point……….
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Sorry everybody.
I meant 3 FGS (9 pts)+ 2 TDS (with one failed 2 pt try by the chefs 13 pts) = 22 – 21. I don’t understand the relevance of the score since I am picking your team to win anyway.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
To say your prediction is half-hearted is an understatement.
We know who you REALLY think is going to win. You just don’t wish to jinx it. ;)
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
by SupremeChief on Nov 5, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Haha! True I guess.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
Actually Sups I said I think we can win.
I don’t know about the outcome since I’m not Raiderdamus or even Damus Jr. Don’t give me that much credit. :P
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
Which is why I said I know who you really think will win.
I don’t believe I’ve picked against the Chiefs yet this season, but all the picks have been very close scores. I guess I’m not 100% homer.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
If the raiders frustrate
the chief’s run game, with quicker and more disruptive adjustment strategies, then they’ll likely win because Oakland possesses a more balanced offense.
Raiders 17-13
Knowing how much our D can give up the big play against teams with good rushing attacks....
I don’t know if we can pull out a close game if we have to rely on Campbell to win the game for us. I think the Chiefs might pull this one out 20-17 if our run game can’t control the TOP and Nnamdi can’t play. I just don’t have a good feelin’ about this one though. Hopefully I’m wrong.
by Raider Zealot on Nov 5, 2010 8:19 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Here to a good game from two improved teams
coming from a chiefs fan I think this is going to be one hell of a game. Like always it will be close and decided by a field goal. Game could go either way.
But has anyone put into thought the following weeks even if you do win. Here’s how I see our two teams finishing the season.
Chiefs -————————————-Raiders————————-
-———————————————————————————————-
@Den (W) (6-3) BYE (5-4) Chiefs should win this Oak gets rest
Ari (W) (7-3) @Pitt (L) (5-5) Chiefs should win this one also — Pitt is too strong
@ Sea (L) (7-4) Mia (w) (6-5) This week confused me either game could switch
Den (W) (8-4) @S.D. (L) (6-6) should be able to sweep Den , dont see you beating sd twice
@S.D. (L) (8-5) @Jac (W) (7-6) we dont win there either, you should roll Jac
@StL (W) (9-5) Den (W) (8-6) wins for both sides
Tenn (L) (9-6) Indy (L) (8-7) tough week after both winning
Oak (W) (10-6) K.C. (L) (8-8) Arrowhead is a tough place to win in – we split
In classic Raiders / Chiefs matchups the AFCW will come down to the last game, and will run through one of our teams.. If you win the last one it will come down to a tie breaker.Which you will win.
That would be an epic season for this rivalry
I would love a good messy rain game for the AFC West crown in the Red Sea. Could it be any better?
"When you believe in yourself......you will conquer many of your fears before they even manifest."
-Zen Master, Nnamdi "The Awesome One" Asomugha
This v v
Lil’ Dam, who has to earn his way, was in charge of oiling up Pesci, but he still found time to give me his prediction.
LMAO!
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
CAN WE REALLY WIN 3 IN A ROW?
I hope so. I just bet the house and car. Raiders look great between the 20’s. Have to settle for 5 FG’s. Dmac busts a long one. D playe great! 3 TO’s.
Raiders 22 quiefs 6
Win 3 for the RIPPER!
a simple insult
Based on the similar sound of the word ‘chief’ and ‘queef’, basically, implying that your team are vaginal farts. Happy to help
Kick their ass and take their stuff!
by AllyRdr on Nov 5, 2010 9:34 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes, I know what it means.
But why Quief? Why not just drop the implication and spell Queef? Or is it a sin to do so?
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
for the record i think "queefs" is equally lame as "faiders"
to each his own, i just don’t find it very amusing or clever
Agree, doesn't fit KC, which if anything else, are never wimpy
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Were 2nd in the NFL in scoring
2nd
30-24 us
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
"If you're ever in a fair fight, then your tactics suck." ಠ_ಠ
i'm glad they're here
they are outing themselves as an ignorant fanbase with the thought process and sense of humor of an 8 year old
Ignorant fanbase?
Haha, 2 wins and suddenly the past 7 years didn’t happen?
Good luck with everything.
I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French Toast.
by craig in calgary on Nov 5, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
? ... What is the connection?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
i have no idea how that is a reply or rebuttal to my post in any way shape or form
thank you for illustrating my point
You accused the Chiefs of having an "ignorant fanbase"
I thought Chief fans were huge homers. Spend 20 minutes on here and I’d swear the Raiders were 10x defending Superbowl Champions. That’s fine, it’s your blog, you can say what you want.
I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French Toast.
by craig in calgary on Nov 5, 2010 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions
What does football knowlege and being an educated student of the game have anything to do with your team winning?
Never mind. I’m starting to feel guilty for some reason; I realize now it’s a form of bullying; you people are so over-matched.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
You people?!?! That is very teamsist of you
Honestly, this little thread here was pretty damn funny. I was just searching for a good “that just flew over your head” pic, but couldn’t find any.
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions
What was it you said in that other thread?
“Shut up bitch, get back in the kitchen?”
You’re right, you sound real educated to me.
I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French Toast.
by craig in calgary on Nov 5, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Raiders 17-16
Defensive, run oriented game, with both defenses playing well. The Raiders add a late touchdown by one of our diminutive receivers, probably on a reverse. The crowd is chanting Bruce half-way through the third quarter. A W is a W !!!
Raiders 31 Chiefs 24
It’s a tight game late, and Shaughnessy gets a strip sack, fumble picked up by Mike Mitchell and taken the distance…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
24-17 KC
KC and Oak trade fg’s first half but leads by 2tds at haftime. Raiders benifit from a PI call and scores rushing TD by the fat fullback and pulls within a TD. KC commits to the run and scorces with the running game with 3:28 left in the 4th. Oak drives 4 and out, to on downs. Kc runs, oak burns some 3 to and is given the ball with 1:52 4th quarter. A garbage td is score by oak with 20 seconds left on the clock. Oak unable to recover onside game over. Good game though
by CHIEFFAN82 on Nov 5, 2010 11:07 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
24-17 KC
KC and Oak trade fg’s first half but leads by 2tds at haftime. Raiders benifit from a PI call and scores rushing TD by the fat fullback and pulls within a TD. KC commits to the run and scorces with the running game with 3:28 left in the 4th. Oak drives 4 and out, to on downs. Kc runs, oak burns some 3 to and is given the ball with 1:52 4th quarter. A garbage td is score by oak with 20 seconds left on the clock. Oak unable to recover onside game over. Good game though
by CHIEFFAN82 on Nov 5, 2010 11:08 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Raiders 26 Chiefs 24
Campbell: 14-27, 203 yards, TD, INT
Bush: 12 carries, 48 yards
McFadden: 16 carries, 74 yards
Defense: 5 Sacks, Fumble, 2 Interceptions, TD
Succop misses a game winning 51 yard field goal
by Raidercrazy1332 on Nov 5, 2010 11:39 AM PDT reply actions
That would be sweeter than any blow out.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
running backs can be sacked?
You won’t see much of Cassel with a. 190 rush avg. But 5 sack would be amazing as seeing we’ve only given up 6 in 8 weeks.
by CHIEFFAN82 on Nov 5, 2010 12:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Stop trying to talk up your OL, ya dick. Like you said, we won’t be seeing much Cassel, so I’m assuming no one has seen a lot of Cassell. Hence the reason for your low sacks allowed numbers.
Hippy/Raider fanatic.
Even if we don't sack him we will overpower your O-Line anyways.
So expect lots of tackles for losses then.
I see the C position on you guys’ team as a major weakspot. Because I noticed some guy named Kyle Williams had 2 sacks against you guys last weak. Who is Kyle Williams? Plus i did more research and noticed he has only 3 sacks right now… which means… your C sucks.
The RaiderLaker
Actually former All Pro Brian Waters had a rough day against Kyle Williams
That happens sometimes
Casey Wiegeman is the Chiefs Center
Hell yeah then, He will line up against Seymour huh?
Woot!!!
I see Kelly doing great against Wiegeman, unless he is doubled with Lija.
The RaiderLaker
You hear correctly
He has been unblockable at times. The whole line is pretty good and deep. That should be the most intriguing matchup on Sunday.
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions
KC's line has gone from horrendous last year
to pretty darn good this year. This should be a fun matchup.
It's fun
This is the way the Raiders Chiefs rivalry is supposed to be. I know it’s just football but it’s so much more fun when these teams are relevant again.
"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra
BTW
I’m going with a 20-14 RAIDERS
Two running teams means odds are a low scoring game. Oakland is at home and seems to be playing out of their minds. The Chiefs are scrambling a bit more then they were earlier. A Chiefs win would not surprise me either but either way it’s going to be a fun Sunday for all fans.
"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra
Raiders 21 Chiefs 17
It’s suppose to be raining on Sunday, so I think this game will be low scoring.
"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?"- Dirty Harry
In a game won and lost between the line of scrimmage, Kansas City gets the Ric Flair
treatment, Raiders 28 Chiefs 17
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER GREAT on Nov 5, 2010 12:06 PM PDT reply actions
hey, bro, I'm for trash talking, but that's racist!!! Keep it civil!!!!
My cousins are Native Americans, I don’t appreciate this crap!!!!
by R.I.P. JACK TATUM RAIDER GREAT on Nov 5, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
RE: Jackson and Dorsey
Jackson has been hampered by injury for much of the season (5 games missed), which is one of the big reasons he hasn’t been making an impact. But the larger point that’s lost here is the DE responsibilities in a 3-4 system. Their first and primary responsibility is two-gap control in the run game, freeing the LBs to make the tackles on the second level without having to brush off FBs or OGs on the second level. As for passing situations, we utilize some different personnel in clear passing situations, bringing in Wallace Gilberry as our pass rushing DE. Dorsey has got some pretty decent pressure at times this season, but something that seems to be a part of Hali’s game is Dorsey commanding a double team by the interior lineman on pass rushes, freeing up Hali for a one on one matchup with the T.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.
If that happens
I’ll declare you guys the best team in the AFC West even though we’ll still have a lead…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
You should be scared of Brandon Flowers
The only guy on the Chiefs who scares me is Eric Berry. Eric Berry is a bad ass motherfucker.
Berry has been great in run support, but at times has been a liability in the passing game. He is just a rookie and all.
Flowers, according to Matt Williamson, Scouts, Inc. has been playing better than Revis, and just as good as Namdi.
Brandon Carr’s looking pretty good too.
Flowers is a top 3 corner in the league.
He’s not Nnamdi’s equal yet though.
by TexasRaider20 on Nov 5, 2010 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Nnamdi is the best CB in the league.Period. It pisses me off to no end when they try to compare guys in their 3rd or 4th year who are ball hawks. Don’t get me wrong, Revis and Flowers are amazing, but Nnamdi is on a whole different level. He knows what the QB is going to do before the WR even makes his cut.
Hippy/Raider fanatic.
Agreed. Nnamdi is a cut above.
A lot of interceptions is a good indication that you’re not as good, or they would have stopped throwing in your direction by now.
by TexasRaider20 on Nov 5, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions
He's been doing it for years, which makes him special
Flowers was OK his rookie year, good last year, and has been fantastic this year.
However, until he’s done it for at least a couple of years at this level he can’t be put in the same league.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Has Flowers been tested though? He has played cheap WRs? Except Andre though.
How did Flowers look against Andre’?
The RaiderLaker
The matchup was considered a draw by football outsiders
I think Andre had 3 catches for decent yards. But the only big catch he had, he pushed off on Flowers for seperation, and yet Flowers got flagged for Pass Interference. That was the turning point in that game.
He may not go up against Randy Moss every week
But he frustrated the hell out of Philip Rivers and Peyton Manning
With Flowers
He plays the left side of the D, and doesn’t shadow the top WR. So it’s whoever he is matched up with.
He’s not giving up many catches though, and as cpa said, Rivers and Manning couldn’t throw to his side.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I'm on a roll.
Last two weeks I predicted huge games for the Raider D and mcfadden. This week with hopefully a full house we win:
Raiders- 27
Chiefs- 9
Mcfadden rushes for 201 yds 2 tds.
by 3XSBCHAMPS.OAK. on Nov 5, 2010 1:35 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Raiders win
Its gonna be a nail bitter,but the Raiders will score a late 4th quarter TD to win 24-21 Raiders
"You don't understand the power of the Dark side"
Darth Raider
30 to 16 Raiders.
Our team is on a roll and fired up and not to mention this another home division game. I believe that the Chiefs will beat us when they’re home though.
Chiefs win
77-2
Chiefs run for 1,072 yards.
I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French Toast.
by craig in calgary on Nov 5, 2010 2:20 PM PDT reply actions
All of those touchdown passes are going to be "horrible throws"
I love how you predicted the Raiders will get a safety – it is a Raiders blog and all
I didn't want to be accused of being a homer
If I would have said 77-0, people wouldn’t have taken me seriously.
A prediction that crazy would have been bolder than this thread. Seriously. What’s with all the BOLD?
I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French Toast.
by craig in calgary on Nov 5, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
fascinating. Have you been sterilized yet?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Not bad. Worse than bad ... and even then you were probably helped. I can't wait till about 4pm Sunday...
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
This is going to be a close one...
but with Nnamdi/Miller Out and the Raiders having a 29th ranked rushing defense; JC will go for about 120 yards with 1 TD and Jones will go for about 77-85 yards with 1 TD. I think chiefs #7 rushing defense will hold McFadden in check for the game and hold him under 100 yds, but he’ll still get at least 1 TD. The Chiefs controlling the clock and play-action off the run will be the difference….Chiefs 21 – Raiders 17
God I love that the Chargers are no longer on top
As much as I hate the raiders, Id much rather see us two vying for the division then those faggots. Honestly though, if the Chiefs win this game, if the division almost locked up considering a 3 game lead and a very easy schedule for the chiefs the rest of the way?
Ill throw a prediction in there as well 24-13 Chiefs
I think with the rain coming all sunday its all about the running game and trench play, which the chiefs have the slight advantage in. We have a true game manager in Cassel which is what we need in the rain and no matter what he always finds a way to keep us in games
I absolutely love this rivalry, my waiter today was a DIE HARD raiders fan(unusual to see in illinois) and i think he spit in my food because I had a chiefs shirt on.
I think it may have
been something other than spit if he was a Raider fan.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Nov 5, 2010 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions
you might check into some medication
by lchristmas on Nov 5, 2010 7:07 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I have some
got it last time I was at your house. She let me keep it as the prescription is unlimited.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Nov 6, 2010 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Calm down
I meant to reply to the tainted food guy so ok, my bad?
by lchristmas on Nov 6, 2010 10:01 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Ok
I was wondering. So squashed I get a little riled with people that start but honest mistake. Me too, Peace!
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Nov 6, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
My Prediction....Pain
No matter who wins, the Chiefs and their fans are still gay.
and the Raiders and they’re fans are still convicts
by Chiefs II TK on Nov 5, 2010 4:29 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Did you come up with this one all on your own?
Sticks and stones may break some bones, but words cause permanent damage.
by Rich Langford on Nov 5, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Not to sound like a douche chief fan but I doubt he did.
When using that term in the possessive text it’s their fans actually. Before you all get froggy with another clever retort I wasn’t referring to all chiefs fans as douches, just those who generalize Raiders fans.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Or, he believes the players themselves are both fans and convicts
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions
i like how he took the trouble to add the apostrophe to "they're" whilst butchering its use
self-parody, chieffan be thy name
Good eye sir.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry didn't notice you got they're first
And normally I wouldnt comment on the ever-challenging there their they’re conundrum but the coupling with the fresh raider-fan-as-convict zinger was too much to resist, I am weak
Its like they have a clown car of imbeciles- I want to walk away from it but I’m fascinated that more and more of them keep getting out one after another
by lchristmas on Nov 5, 2010 7:05 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I like the clown car comparison!
I have been trying to ignore them because frankly, I just don’t care what they think, but they just keep showing up. I look forward to next week when we can get back to bickering amongst ourselves.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
fish in barrel
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 5, 2010 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I can't speak for everyone but I have underestimated you mr lxmas.
This week has brought out the best in the nation and I hope the team’s execution on the field matches it. You have made me laugh as hard as I have on this site in a very long time.
"I didn't fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong"
- Benjamin Franklin
by TAW on Nov 5, 2010 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
This is a stupid prediction, only a Chief fan could make
42-1 Raiders!
Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.
-The Rapist
by Rich Langford on Nov 6, 2010 2:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Actually, I have change my mind
The Raiders destroy the Chiefs in the redzone and Khalif Barnes catches a TD
21-19 Raiders
Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.
-The Rapist
by Rich Langford on Nov 6, 2010 2:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I love the blowout predictions by Raider fans, they're going to make the win that much nicer for KC
Fact is that there’s about zero chance KC gets blown out…lose maybe, but no blowout. KC will stick to the same gameplan they’ve had all season long, which is to run the ball & stick to safe, high percentage passes. As for the Oakland offense, with two of your top 3 pass catchers likely out & Flowers shutting down DHB, you’re going to be stuck trying to rely on McFadden. Romeo knows this, and he’ll have a scheme ready to contain him.
The biggest problem for Oakland is that your guys rely on capitalizing on mistakes and turnovers by the opposition. KC doesn’t make too many mistake or turn the ball over.
My prediction is a low scoring game through three quarters, with KC pulling away in the 4th off of a couple bad picks thrown by Campbell. 24-10 KC.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
zero chance of a blowout, and a source above talked of where is glenn dorsey...oh I dont know, creating those holes for the LB's to shoot through as a freaking 3-4 DE
Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt
oops. Think it will be a blowout either way
But your “zero chance” shit is why you guys are a joke. The chance is not high, but what if your run game is shut down? what if we get up early and cassel has to pass? A blowout is possible. 5 wins against a soft schedule and now youre the 85 bears. I love how since you havent turned the ball over much it is completely impossible that it will ever happen.
by lchristmas on Nov 6, 2010 10:10 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Look who our defense has played
SD, #1 offense. Indy, #2 offense. Houston, #7 offense. So yes we’ve faced some decent opponents, offensively. We don’t think we’re the best, but we are good. As for your Offense. Which defenses have you played? You’ve played SD #1, the next best… STL at #11 then it gets worse. HOU at #32, SEA at #26, ARI at #27 and DEN at #24. I think there’s about 2% chance of a Raider Blowout win
Can we be the AFC West Champions in 2010. You better believe it
Hali and Flowers are Pro Bowlers, even if the NFL fails to realise it
by trentchiefsfan on Nov 6, 2010 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions
A reasonable presentation if assessed by averaging out our first 8 / 7 games this season
but, ultimately failing because the Raiders since the SF disaster are not the same team they were before. How does Charles run in mud? Are his slashing cutbacks possible? No. We predicted the KC improvement early and it came to pass; we also predicted our own greater and surpassing improvement, that to has come to pass and the proof manifests tomorrow.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions
I think Charles had a pretty good game last year @ Oakland...I recall a long rushing TD
But if your DL can stonewall the run game and generate consistant pressure against Cassel, I think Oakland has a good shot at a win. If they don’t do that I’ll be very surprised with an Oakland victory. Maybe you’re right that the team has changed, but I’m not buying it until I see it against a decent team.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
This site is a great place for Raiders fans
but the Quief fans are making it very entertaining on here don’t they have their own home where they can go and play. 24-21 Raiders
I've been bleeding Silver and Black for 40 years its time they get back to playing Raider's football
Yep, arrowheadpride is one of the top sports blogs anywhere.
But KC fans always leave to mix it up a little with the opposition. Isn’t it more fun that way? Beside that, I think we are a lot more cordial than the fans of most other teams trolling around…for the most part.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
StD doesn't come here in force and numbers like KC or Denver. These 4 fan bases are
distinct from each other. But Denver is more like us than you guys or StD, imo.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
That's great. but who are the
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
WTF? Did that really happen or is it shopped.
If true, it goes to show you that the stereo-types are a little correct over their grammar/reading skils.
The RaiderLaker
I'm surprised you don't remember it.
It’s real alright.
by Raider Zealot on Nov 6, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions
With all of the bolded text, you prolly can't see the link so I'll post it again for ya....
by Raider Zealot on Nov 6, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
WTF? that commercial looks old as hell. I wasn't around at that time.
But i thought it happened in a real game… Guess not… You ruined it Zealot!!!!
;)
The RaiderLaker
LOL I am surprised you don't remember that one
One of the funniest commercials ever, plus it makes fun of the Chiefs.
Whenever KC plays my dad and I always ask each other “That’s great, but who are the Chefs?”
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
As this is a prediction post, I predict you will change your signature by week 13.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Nov 6, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I predict you won't be happy this time tomorrow when I come by to post on here
Playoffs????? You wanna talk about Playoffs????
Yes.
So. I left the blog but has watched as other Chiefs fans have flocked over and talked trash..
Hmm. this game will be close. going with 17-14 Chiefs Also fellow Chiefs fans, I am asking you guys to quit the trash talking and save it for after the game is over. Because If the Raiders win, it will make every Chiefs fan look ignorant for coming on here to a Raiders Blog and talking crap about them only to be handed a defeat by them.
2010 Kansas City Chiefs:11-5
by Weatherman Kumke on Nov 6, 2010 4:21 PM PDT reply actions
+1
I very much mind the cockroach invasion.
by Spirals galore on Nov 6, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions
This game will be high-scoring
There is absolutely no question in my mind that when both offenses step on the field today, they will dominate. There is a reason we are both atop the mother-fuggin league in rushing. The emphasis/pressure put on each defense to stop the opposing run will open up what I forsee as-a big day for both Cassel and Campbell.
Great offense trumps good defense in this once again meaningful battle. Although a big play on defense may just be the deciding factor in this one. This will be a Berry good game. ; )
Black Holians – 31 Chiefs – 34
We will have two rookies on our squad sharing Rookie of the Year honors.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Silver And Black Pride
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
- All reports positive after Peyton Manning’s first OTA in Denver
- Ryan Tannehill won’t start right away, according to Dolphins’ owner
- Lions WR Titus Young barred from practice after starting fight with teammate
- Winslow move could be a costly one for Bucs in the short term
- Matthew Stafford spends $15,000 to win auction package, then gives it to a young fan’s family
