Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

NFL Schedule Week 15, Broncos-Raiders: Role Reversal

Richard Seymour doesn't charge for his chiropractic services.

Here they come to save the day. What's that? It's a bird. It's a plane. No, it's an AFC West team. When we last left our faithful heroes, they were walking off the swamp land of the South with their heads hanging and their bodies trembling from the sting of a harsh defeat.

The loss has pushed the season to the brink. Another loss this week and we can send the postseason hopes of this season to the overflowing junk-yard of recent Raiders' history. Don't fear, the AFC West is here. It's the theme of the Raiders' 2010 season. The Raiders sit on the eve of destruction and they get well on the AFC West. It's time to venture to that well once more.

This is not just any AFC West team either. This is the lowly, dysfunctional, interim coach led Denver Broncos. The team the Raiders humiliated 59-14 earlier this very season. The same Denver Broncos, that until this year, seemed to be the only AFC West team the Raiders could beat. The same Denver Broncos that lost to the Arizona Cardinals last week, 43-13.

Now, I could venture deep into the stats of this matchup, but to do so would be an exercise in overconfidence. I am going to say, that the Raiders have not been on the right side of a paper matchup this lopsided since 2002. The Broncos aren't really good at anything. The passing game got off to an impressive start, but has since tapered off. They also are kind enough to be the weakest in areas in which it is not good to be against the Raiders.

They are horrible at stopping the run, they can't rush the passer, they have struggled to run and they haven't been protecting the passer. All of these little details were on highlighted display in their first meeting of the season. That blowout was no fluke.

It is because of these factors not in spite of them that I say this the biggest game of Tom Cable's career. It is a game that he is supposed to win, a game they need to win and a game he will have to keep his players from suffering a letdown. Time and again, this group of Raiders have proven to be resilient. While they have the playoffs dangling in front of them as motivation, the after-effects of the heartbreak that was the Jaguars game cannot be overestimated. Everything you need to know about that is in this quote by the Cable guy. Cable:

We have been so focused about this opportunity that we have, and we feel like it slipped away from us on Sunday. It’s over, we have to move beyond it and so it hasn’t been about those kinds of things. It’s been about staying true to the opportunity. We need some help now, but we really can control whether we’re ready for it to happen by winning football games. So our approach has been to go after this Denver game like nothing before and let it rip. That can be our only thought process right now. 

"We feel like we let it slip away." This is the kind of thing that can linger. A demoralizing factor deep in the mind and body that can persist no matter what they tell themselves. All the while, they are headed into a game against a team they beat by 45 points. Playoffs or not, these circumstances could make it hard to dial in on the now.

In the NFL, you can't just show up with intensity on Sunday. You have to have it all through the week. They can talk about being ready all they want, but are they going to be 100 percent focused on this game all week?

They better be. For a coach who has been at the helm during a few too many lackadaisical performances, it is the moment of truth for Cable. He needs to make sure this team comes out with a vengeance and puts it to the Broncos, like we all know they can. They need to get off the ball and win their individual assignments with physical dominance and they need to do it from the opening gun.

If they don't, we start to venture into, "On any given Sunday" territory. One need look no further than the recent history of this storied rivalry to see how that can play out in situations eerily similar to this one. Come with me, Ebenezer as we waltz into seasons of spoiler past.

Star-divide

 

2004 Week 12: The 3-7 Raiders went into Denver against the 7-3 Broncos and edged out a 25-24 thriller. It was a game that featured one of the greatest TD catches you'll ever see by Ronald Curry. Curry, Jerry Porter and Doug Gabriel combined in that game for 16 catches 4 TDs and 296 yards (Raiders' WRs have 5 TDs this year). The Raiders lost the first game against the Broncos that year 25-3.

2007 Week 13: The 5-6 Broncos traveled to Oakland and lost to the 3-8 Raiders, 34-20. Josh McCown threw for 3 TDs and Justin Fargas ran for 146 yards. Jay Cutler sucked. The Raiders lost the first matchup 23-20 in OT

2008 Week 12: The 2-8 Raiders routed the 6-4 Broncos in Denver, 31-10. JaMarcus Russell was 10-11 with 152 yards in that game. On any given Sunday indeed! Ashley Lelie caught a 51 yard TD. Jay Cutler sucked. The Raiders lost in that season's opener to the Broncos 41-14.

2009 Week 15: The 4-9 Raiders went into Denver and beat the 8-5 Broncos 20-19. The Raiders rode the three headed QB attack of Charlie Frye, JP Lossman and JaMarcus Russell to victory. In a glimpse of what we are now used to, Darren McFadden had 74 yards on just 12 carries. Jay Cutler sucked--in Chicago this time. The Raiders lost to Denver in Week 3, 23-3.

*The links are to the box scores.

That's three years in a row and four out of the previous six seasons in which the Broncos came into the second matchup against the Raiders with playoff aspirations, while the Raiders were a team playing out the string. The Broncos had beaten the Raiders in the first matchup in each of those seasons and, in every year but one, thoroughly convincing fashion. The Raiders had no business winning those games. Yet, they did, because each time the Broncos let them hang around early. This gave the Raiders the belief and motivation that they could win, while stuffing it down the throat of their rival.

The Raiders can't let the Broncos hang around. They can't let this game progress and have the Broncos thinking they have a chance to win it. They need to take it to 'em early and let them know that they'd be best served to just continue to go through their familiar routine of losing.

If the Raiders do leave that crack of daylight for the Broncos, their is one matchup they might be able to exploit. One thing has changed with the Broncos recently. They have begun to run the football. In the first 8 games, they rushed for over 90 yards only one time. In four of the last five, they have rushed for at least 119 yards. In the last five games, Knowshon Moreno is averaging 92.4 yards per game at 5.2 yards per carry.

Those are some solid numbers. The Raiders can't risk letting the Broncos begin to wear down the Raiders defense with their newfound ground game.

I am obligated by the laws of information released to the public, to mention Tim Tebow. The Broncos have named Orton the starter for Sunday, but Orton has some banged up ribs and he didn't practice on Wednesday. Tim Tebow received the majority of the first team snaps. The substitute Bronco coach has mentioned getting Tebow involved and the Broncos certainly have nothing to lose.

On the surface, playing Tebow against the Raiders defensive line and with the Broncos banged up receiving corp looks like a disaster to me. Then again, last year the Raiders beat the Broncos with Charlie Frye, JP Losman and JaMarcus Russell and a running game people had written off.

Poll
Who will have the most yards in their stat line for the Raiders?
Jason Campbell
149 votes
Darren McFadden
731 votes
Michael Bush
42 votes
Jacoby Ford
47 votes
Khalif Barnes
18 votes

987 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 46 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jay Cutler sucks.

that is all.

If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.

by Parental Advisory on Dec 16, 2010 5:15 AM PST reply actions  

That is a damn good post Noontide.

If the Raiders players and staff ever needed to get motivated for a rivalry game it would be this one. That is eery how we continuously fail against the Broncos early in the season only to come through at the end of the season when they would have something to play for. I disagree with the assessment that Tebow playing against our secondary being a bad thing. A mobile QB with a running game that seems to be improved against our man to man defense is actually a negative in my book. We need to blitz and blitz some more against the donks and also play with 8 in the box the majority of the game against the Broncos offense. We cannot let them get any type of long-sustaining drives to keep them in this one or else we will be crying into our Fruit Loops Monday morning.

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 16, 2010 7:45 AM PST reply actions  

Ah the Tebow factor...

While you are absolutely right about the mobility being a plus for him. I am thinking more in terms of the bad release leading to turnovers and then mostly him trying to run and then getting hammered by our d-lineman. As far the mobility, I don’t see it creating too many easy pass plays due to their depleted WRs and the Raiders man to man. While it may mean he picks up more yards with his feet, I think the fact that they will knock the hell out of him will even that out.

I think the Raiders pass D is more prone to giving up yards from QBs in the pocket on crossing routes and long balls. Neither of which are Tebow’s strengths. It’ll be fun to watch. How much do you think we’ll get to see it?

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

depleted WRs?

broncos still have Lloyd, gaffney, royal, decker, moreno healthy

by Sergio AppleSeed on Dec 16, 2010 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Lloyd and Decker are battling injuries, correct?

And Thomas is probably out, right? Is there a different Moreno that plays WR?

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 11:07 PM PST up reply actions  

He's getting the bulk of the reps in practice Rich.

I think he’s going to see a lot of time. If not starting the game but let’s say they’re down 21-3 or something close to a 3 score deficit I can see him relieving Orton at the half. I think if they’re smart they would start Tebow and simplify the play calls for him with lots of hand-offs to start and then play-action. They can get him out of the pocket on roll-outs and QB draws out of the shot gun. They should also spread us out so it’s not so congested at the line. I hope they don’t because I like our chances against Orton who is just playing this season out until free agency hits.

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 17, 2010 7:44 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't think Tebow is much to worry about.

At the end of the day, he was drafted as a severely expensive fixer-upper. Like an old Caddy, you fix it up right, you got one sweet machine. You fix it up wrong, and it’s demolition derby fodder, because your “fixing” has to be unfixed before it get’s fixed properly. I’m surpised though that Brady Quinn has spent this whole year scraping barnacles off the bottom of the depth chart.

by the red guy on Dec 16, 2010 8:05 AM PST reply actions  

+1,000,000

That would be nice.

Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Raider fans copy & paste 130466024997 in Ebay!
Raider fans copy & paste 130466024997 in Ebay!

by JonDoe on Dec 16, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Why??

The guy can’t start over Orton, Delhomme, Anderson, Wallace, Tebow, or McCoy. They can keep him.

by Not Jamarcus! on Dec 16, 2010 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't understand the love for Brady Quinn either.

I would take Orton over him. At least he’s proven he can put up numbers in this league.

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 16, 2010 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Dude,

He did start over Anderson before being injured, never was on a team with Delhomme, Wallace, or McCoy, And Tebow has yet to take a snap as a starter. Also, until recently, Ortons stint in Denver has been a personal success for him, just not for the team, which leaves no legitimate reason to bench him. I was surprised Tebow made 2nd string. Also, given time, and a decent team, Quinn should be pretty good.

by the red guy on Dec 16, 2010 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Jamarcus started over Gradkowski as well. That doesn't mean a thing.

He was also traded by the Browns after starting him because he was a 1st round pick. I don’t think he will ever be pretty good and I’m a Notre Dame fan.

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 16, 2010 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I can see your point about the 1st round pick thing,

But last year Cleveland was setting any QB up for failure. I think part of the reason they traded him was the change of management, plus, Hillis has been a beast this year. Also, Holmgren likes Wallace, and has a better feel for what he can do.

by the red guy on Dec 17, 2010 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

No, no, no to Quinn

That was a horrible year for QBs! Besides, I can’t see Al oking a move to get the noodle armed qb

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Great article Noon

Nice and thorough. I refuse to predict bad things for the Raiders. They’ve done great this year. So even though the odds of the 49ers beating SD @ Qualcomm are horribly against them to the point of should I watch? and a loss could virtually end both of our seasons, I will watch the game and “Down with the Chargers!!!”.

"Let’s keep doing what we know helps us be successful,"
"That’s the approach, stay focused on what we know we are and what works for us, and don’t let distractions in. If we can continue to do that we have a chance, but it is very exciting." - Tom Cable

by Porcupine on Dec 16, 2010 11:03 AM PST reply actions  

On the other hand

The best hope I have is the 49ers beat up SD the way they beat up Denver. They had a Denver omelette right after we did. So the Chargers might just be ripe for the pickin’.

"Let’s keep doing what we know helps us be successful,"
"That’s the approach, stay focused on what we know we are and what works for us, and don’t let distractions in. If we can continue to do that we have a chance, but it is very exciting." - Tom Cable

by Porcupine on Dec 16, 2010 11:52 AM PST reply actions  

One thing the Chargers have proven is they can lose to anyone, anytime.

Still, the Niners have been a crap sandwich on the road.

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Plus everytime I've seen them on prime-time in the Singletary era

They’ve lost in a heart-breaking fashion (if you’re a Niner fan) in the last seconds of the game.

This time it might be us that’s crying along with their fans.

On the upside, as long as we win the next two games, the game at Arrowhead is likely going to be huge. Even if KC hasn’t lost by then, there’s a really good chance that we’ll be in a position to play spoilers. Hopefully they will have, in which case we’ll be playing for the a shot at the division no matter what. It may only count for 3 hours though, as the SD/Den game will be after our game at KC.

Even if we don’t end up going to the playoffs this year cause we don’t get the help we need, but we still win our last three, I’m going to be very happy about this season. Esp. if that last victory matters for something. Us getting in would be best, but crushing the queefs chances at their own house and going 6-0 in the West would be pretty sweet.

by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 16, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

No doubt. I'd be happy about 3 in a row to end they year.

They can’t control what happens outside of that. To end the year with victories over the Colts and Chiefs would be huge!

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 11:09 PM PST up reply actions  

+1000

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 17, 2010 7:46 AM PST up reply actions  

A+++ post Noontide, bravo

I expected the poll for Darren McFadden’s stat column to explode like I expect his actual stat column to on his fantasy stat page and the real stat books too around 1:15 p.m. Sunday. If he finishes his season with the gaudy numbers it seems he should rack up this game and even if you judge only by his performances of late, he’ll break some all-purpose yard records, and make his way into the all-time Raider rusher stat column sooner than we all expected (I expected this! lol).

 Also, the on paper irresistibly deliciousness of this matchup has me starting DMac, L. Murphy, and the Raiders D in my fantasy leagues for playoff games with do or die implications—a move completely uncharacteristic of my head not heart philosophy that got me there—and I feel good, because I know this team has their backs against the wall, and they will respond like the beast they are when cornered.

I’m confident in the win, for the implications for both coach and team make it understood that the Broncos will show up to play Sunday, and that a loss to the storied rival means all you’ve built up to this point will be lost with the game.

"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."--John Madden

""The massive Raider Nation is beyond doubt the sleaziest and rudest and most sinister mob of thugs and wackos ever assembled."--Hunter S. Thompson

by brhynno on Dec 16, 2010 6:31 PM PST reply actions  

I feel good being cocky. I don’t really believe in jinx’s or anything like that, so I can proudly say I expect us to win by 30+.

We’re known as a team to lose one week, and come out and destroy the next. But, but, but, the loss last week was one that was not in blowout proportion. We had the game in our hands, but let it go. We’re going to come out and EXPLODE all over Denver. It’s almost going to be sad how bad Darren McFadden is going to make them look. I say 20+ carries for DMC.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 16, 2010 10:44 PM PST up reply actions  

You know, when I was getting set to put explode in all caps, I thought the same exact thing.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 16, 2010 11:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd like a show of hands...

of how many know what bukake is. I’m not sure if that is the correct spelling either.
Howard Stern listener noon?

JUST DOMINATE BABY !!!

by rambis64 on Dec 17, 2010 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I believe bukake and bukakke are both acceptable spellings

Of course, most times that it is spelled out letters aren’t used :) I actually don’t listen to Stern, but I do have some learned friends. Off-topic, but years ago and in my past life—when this term was more obscure—I was on vacation with two friends and we went around introducing ourselves as the Bukake brothers, Rocky, Chachi and Bobby.

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 17, 2010 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

i have friends who are sick in the head and have too much free time and internet access

I guess that’s a “yes, I know”.

Kick their ass and take their stuff!

by AllyRdr on Dec 17, 2010 2:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I wouldn't get too confident.

This is a rivalry game and the Broncos found a new reason to hate us again after the near 60 we put on them. We almost beat the Cardinals and got shellacked by the Texans at home the following week. Oakland cannot take any rivalry game lightly or else our season may be lost.

Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.

by TAW on Dec 17, 2010 7:49 AM PST up reply actions  

We have seen this before

Once again another big game for us to win and history has shown that we loose these types of game no matter if we are playing at home. We just don’t have the ability to rise up and our coaching staff sucks in motivating the players. The Chargers destroyed the 49ers because they know how important the win was and has the determination and heart in not letting a team they suppose to beat stick around the whole game to have the chance to upset them. We will see how bad we win these next 3 games against 2 teams that has a better chance in going to the playoffs than us.

by Archangel25 on Dec 16, 2010 8:22 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

No love for Zach Miller?

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 16, 2010 11:09 PM PST reply actions  

I didn't see anyway Miller could get more yards than Campbell

well, if Boller plays, but if that happens…I’m not going to care about a damn poll!

Does this look as bad as it looks?

by Rich Langford on Dec 16, 2010 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Ahhh. I gotch’ ya. Makes more sense now.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 17, 2010 5:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Richard seymour

Maybe we’ll see Tebow get knocked down by Seymour just ask Ben Roethlisbeger how it feels
RAIDER NATION

by Carmenbruno on Dec 17, 2010 5:11 AM PST reply actions  

I don’t think Tebow is the type of player to talk smack on the field. He’ll take a beating, but he’ll be humble about it and learn from it. That’s what good players do.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 17, 2010 5:22 AM PST up reply actions  

MONDAY REPORT

“Tim Tebow, Denver Bronco’s QB, was found in his Denver apartment bathroom eating his own excrement and screaming over and over ‘No more Seymour! No more Seymour!’. Apparently after Sundays loss to the Oakland Raiders, and Richard Seymour’s NFL record 11 sacks in one game, Tebow fell off the edge”.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 17, 2010 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

If Tebow plays I think everyone will get a surprise

Since he’s an unknown quantity even Denver doesn’t know what he can do. But we do feel he can and will be our qb for the future. If he does play I think you won’t be getting many sacks on him. This dude can scramble.

We conquered this territory with our bodies and souls, then we watered it with our tears.
Go Denver!

by SSinSD on Dec 17, 2010 11:11 AM PST reply actions  

Murphys comments about Tebow and the Mississippi game

And last weeks game against Jacksonville got me believing this team is gonna win out.

by $73.27 on Dec 17, 2010 9:37 PM PST reply actions  

That’d be sweet! I’m focusing more on 8-8, but 9-7 would be crazy awesome!

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." Vince Lombardi

by JaKe. on Dec 17, 2010 11:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50