NFL Schedule Week 16, Colts-Raiders: A Huge Or Meaningless Contest
In the spirit of Julian Assange, I am going to tell you that I am mailing this one in a bit. 'Tis the season to be busy as hell. I can't very well have a compelling game of this magnitude be only the second game I haven't previewed though. Or is it? The magnitude that is.
The most interesting thing about this contest is that the Raiders will know before, or very soon after, if they will be traveling to Kansas City to play the Chiefs for division supremacy. There is the tiny factor of the Chargers, but their fate will be decided as the same time as the Raiders. So, the team that kicked off the Raiders season, may be the team that helps end it. Go Titans--you owe us.
If the completely lucky, talentless, undeserving, steroid-enhanced and ugly Chiefs do win on Sunday, I think it is going to be fascinating to see how the Raiders respond. How could they not suffer from an intensity letdown? I'll be mightily impressed if they don't. Let's hope we don't have to find out.
This game is fascinating beyond the external circumstances. There are some really compelling matchups in this one and any time one of the top-5 QBs ever comes into to town, it's interesting. As I was thinking about Peyton Manning and his strengths, it led me to hunch that has been somewhat verified (small sample size) with research.
Over the course of his career, Manning has thrived while being blitzed. He may be the best ever at pre and post snap reads and he gets rid of the ball quickly. This allows him to not only pick apart blitzes, but zone defenses. It is what pushes him from a great QB to in the GOAT conversation.
Well, these are the very things that the Raiders do not do. Everyone knows it. The Raiders do not blitz often and they use almost exclusively man-to-man defense. By nature, the Raiders eliminate Manning's greatest strengths. I went back and reviewed Manning's career starts against the Raiders.
12/15/07 Week 15: Colts 21 @ Raiders 14
Manning: 22/39 276 yards 1 TD, 1 INT, QB Rating: 76.4
10/4/04 Week 4: Raiders 14 @ Colts 35
Manning: 16/26, 198 yards 3TDs, 1 INT, QB Rating: 107.5
10/14/01 Week 5 Raiders 23 @ Colts 18
Manning: 26/41, 241, 2 TDs, 2 INTs, QB Rating: 75.4
9/10/00 Week 2: Raiders 38 @ Colts 31
Manning 33/48, 341, 3 TDs, 2 INTs, QB Rating: 94.7
Those numbers add up to a QB Rating of 86.3. Manning's career QB Rating is 94.9. That's a pretty significant drop. Now, I realize that there are some holes in this comparison and I am not a big fan of QB Rating anyway. It places too much importance on TD/INT ratio with no bearing on situation or run/pass ratio in the redzone etc.
Let's put these performances in context of the season.
The 2000 meeting was really Manning's break out performance and that was about the best game of his season.
In 2001, Manning's 241 yards was his 6th lowest total of the season. More impressive is the fact that only two of the lower numbers came in losses. In the others, his passing numbers were limited because the Colts were relying on the run game. That year, the Raiders held the Colts to under 100 rushing yards and still kept Manning's number down, despite the fact he threw 41 passes.
In 2004, Manning and the Colts had their way. He didn't have to pass much and he was efficient when he did.
In 2007, The Raiders held Manning to his 4th lowest passing yards on the season. Like 2001, they did it while limiting the Colts ground game, too. The Raiders only allowed 58 rushing yards to the Colts. In 2 of the 3 lower passing totals, the Colts had big leads and ended with well over 100 yards rushing.
I think it is safe to make some conclusions from this. The Raiders defensive philosophy takes Manning from the best of the best to just really good. If you don't play solid defense, despite the system Manning is going to kill you. It's not like Manning can't tell who is open in man-to-man coverage, it just means he is not super human he is just a really impressive mortal.
Let's quickly get into some of the other interesting matchups.
Freeney and Mathis vs. Raiders' Tackles
Uh oh! The Colts are a pedestrian 17th in the league with a 6.2 sack percentage, but 17.5 of their 25 sacks are from their DE combo. The majority of the Raiders pass protection woes are a result of their Tackle play. Jared Veldheer has struggled, understandably, against all-world pass rushing OLBs Hali, Harrison and Wake in 3-4 systems. This will be his first full-game test against an elite DE in a 4-3.
On the other side, Langston Walker has yet been cleared to play following his concussion. So, Mario Henderson may be making his first start at RT and we know he gets burned by DE pass rushers at his natural position.
The Raiders are going to have to give both of their tackles help in passing situations. Situations, they may be able to avoid because:
Raiders' Run Game vs. Colts' Run D
The Colts are 32nd in yards allowed per rush. The Raiders are 2nd in yards gained per rush. The Colts are poor in almost every run D category. They are 30th in DVOA for example.
Raiders' Pass Rush vs. Colts' Pass Protection
The Colts lead the league with a 3.2 adjusted sacks allowed rate. The Raiders continue to lead the league with a 9.0 adjusted sack rate.
Zach and The Backs vs. Colts' Passing D
The Colts have done a decent job stopping WRs this year, but they have the 29th ranked DVOA against TEs and the 27th against backs.
The Path to Victory
Last week the Colts were able to shut down the Jaguars run game by stacking the box and forcing the Jags to try and beat them over the top. As we discussed leading up to the Jags game, their offense is very similar to the Raiders. The big difference is that the Raiders are much more likely to go up top.
If the Colts are going to sell-out to stuff the run, the Raiders are going to have to beat them over the top. To do this, they are going to have to give Jason Campbell time. They can assist him with play actions, screens and draws. All of which are an offense's best friend to slow down teams bringing heavy pressure on the edge. In the end though, Veldheer and Langrio Halker are gong to have bring their A games and they could use some help from Barnes, Miller, Stewart and the RBs.
When Freeney and Mathis do bring the heat Campbell needs to get the quick dump offs to the backs. The Colts have struggled to stop 'em and the Raiders backs are amazingly gifted in the passing game.
We discussed the Raiders defensive scheme, and players to fit it, in limiting Manning's greatness. In the end, it doesn't mean anything if their D sucks. They made Chad Henne look like a pro bowler for Al's sake. They will need their defensive line to get pressure and their DBs to play an aggressive and effective bump and run coverage. Pressure is going to be more key than sacks against the quick to release Manning.
The Raiders cannot employ a bend but don't break philosophy. The Colts lead the league in converting 67.5 percent of their redzone opportunities into TDs. This is also where the Raiders like to go into a zone non-coverage defense. The kind that Manning will kill.
The Colts run game has struggled all year. They are 15th in percentage of runs that have been stuffed and that is their best ranking. They are 29th in the second level and 31st in the open field. Both things that would play into the Raiders hands.
They will need to force the Colts into 3rd down passing situations and create some 3 and outs and then wear out the Colts D with their run game. Go Raiders. Go Titans. Go Bengals...ugh, that got more disheartening as it went.
53 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This game means a lot
just because it’s the Colts. The rest of the playoff picture may or may not hang in the balance for us. Even through all the bad years of late, it’s the big games that you want to win to prove yourself. Kind of like how we beat the Steelers last year while they were in a playoff hunt. Or the year before where we knocked off Tampa from going to the playoffs. This is a big game like that, because it would definitely make up for a few losses that we thought we should’ve won. Maybe not in the win column but in the respect column.
"Let’s keep doing what we know helps us be successful,"
"That’s the approach, stay focused on what we know we are and what works for us, and don’t let distractions in. If we can continue to do that we have a chance, but it is very exciting." - Tom Cable
Langrio Halker
That’s a classic. Nice. I’ll make a comparison and you guys decide if it works.
The Chargers beat the Colts, The Chiefs lost to the Colts, The Chiefs lost to the Colts and the Chargers. So…. The Raiders won against the Cheifs, and the Chargers, so they must be better than Colts, so they should win.
I’ma just keep telling myself this and keep myself happy.
If Winning Isn't Everthing, Why Do They Keep Score? - Vince Lombardi
Veldheer will plug the dike and if waters rushing in from the other side we should plug it with Mario who seems best at ROT
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"We had to get back to who we are, and that's physical and smash-mouth." - Robert Gallery 12/5/2010
I believe we had premonitions of this alignment up front
did we not?
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."--John Madden
""The massive Raider Nation is beyond doubt the sleaziest and rudest and most sinister mob of thugs and wackos ever assembled."--Hunter S. Thompson
Why I feel Reece comes away:
The Colts have done a decent job stopping WRs this year, but they have the 29th ranked DVOA against TEs and the 27th against backs.
and stacking the box will leave them susceptible to that nasty end around from Jacoby, Murphy, or Darrius too. Zach comes a close second in catches, but gets the TDs as he becomes a premier target in red zone situations against this team.
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."--John Madden
""The massive Raider Nation is beyond doubt the sleaziest and rudest and most sinister mob of thugs and wackos ever assembled."--Hunter S. Thompson
heres whats mind boggling!
Ive seen JC run the 4 minute drill and literally hit recievers in the numbers on consecutive plays. If they can get open in the last 4mins why the hell wont we employ that same strategy bit during the game instead of sending Hey Bey on a frealking go-route 80% of the game No wonder why hes always tired lolol
I want to be the modern day version of Super Mario Brothers!!! Dont care for *shrooms*, but would love to *get large* and *spit fire*...unless im constantly told "thanks, but your girl is in another castle". That would rate a 8.9 on the ole *Suck-ometer*!!!
by Kobe Won Kenobi on Dec 23, 2010 3:05 AM PST reply actions
Strategy maybe???
Send him deep every play. Stretch the D. Draw a corner and safety, open up the middle for Zach, or the backs if they get past the front 7 of the D. I don’t think anyone believes he’s going to catch anything, but you can’t just let him run free.
by TexasRaider20 on Dec 23, 2010 7:42 AM PST up reply actions
You're right, it makes the safety choose
it’s perfect strategy against a cover two, because the basis for that coverage is to limit big plays. Having DHB on a fly opens the seam for Zach or the Slot WR. We get their safety cheating up for that seam and we can and should pop the cork on a deep shot to DHB. He’s getting better, and maybe we’ll see the leap in year three from him that we’re seeing from DMC…I have to hold out hope…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Dec 23, 2010 8:17 AM PST up reply actions
Chiefs will win
so this whole conversation is a moot point :) isn’t it :)
by DMc,JC,TJ-Threeheadedmonster on Dec 23, 2010 6:26 AM PST reply actions
I wouldn't consider this a lock just yet.
Collins is very capable, and Johnson is arguably the best back in the league.
Their run D is near the top in YPA. Their pass D isn’t great, but not horrible. I think TEN has a legitmate shot at winning this.
by TexasRaider20 on Dec 23, 2010 7:48 AM PST up reply actions
Even if you beat the Titans
we’ll still hand the division to SD next week…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Dec 23, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions
I have no idea whether the Chiefs will win
But my God, I have never wished a choke job on a more obnoxious group of cornfed dickhead fans.
If lightning strikes and we are playing for it all next week, I may have to make the 24 hour drive to witness the cherry being placed on top of their fail sundae in person
I have no qualms about sporting my silver and black wherever and whenever it is necessary
Do they have hotels in Kansas City yet or do you have to pony up to the hitchin post and find a friendly whorehouse?
Any conversation
with a raider fan is moot. Half of em barely comprehend english. But yes the Chiefs will win thereby sending the raider faithful into their black holes for the winter. I’ll be sure to keep you chumps updated on how the Chiefs do in their first round home playoff game. After that you biotchs are on your own.
CHIEFS 2010 AFC WEST CHAMPS!!!
-1
"Let’s keep doing what we know helps us be successful,"
"That’s the approach, stay focused on what we know we are and what works for us, and don’t let distractions in. If we can continue to do that we have a chance, but it is very exciting." - Tom Cable
Half of em barely comprehend english.
That’s a moronic statement. How many languages do you speak, besides your English?
by Spirals galore on Dec 25, 2010 12:09 AM PST up reply actions
I was at this game, it was a great second have come back for the Raiders, 9/10/00 Week 2: Raiders 38 @ Colts 31
At the end of the day, Chiefs winning or losing, there is no better way to end a season than winning out. So the Raiders winning out playoffs or not is a great way to give next season something to look forward too. The Raiders are vastly improved over last year, and hopefully we will build from here. Go Raiders!!!!
by Rodney Sacramento on Dec 23, 2010 7:38 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
It also serves to showcase and separate the character guys from the 'Moss' types
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"We had to get back to who we are, and that's physical and smash-mouth." - Robert Gallery 12/5/2010
by Sons-of-Blanda on Dec 23, 2010 8:06 AM PST up reply actions
You know
if we don’t win the divsions, we can take pride in having knocked both the Queefs and the Geldings out of the playoffs…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Dec 23, 2010 8:20 AM PST up reply actions
If you're gonna go down,
You might as well drag some asshole you can’t stand with you.
Perspective
Before the season most of said we’d be happy to go 9-7 or 8-8…if we can get to that level while knocking two teams out of the playoffs, I’m cool with it. It gives us a lot to build on going into next year, if there is a next year. All our key players are locked up…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Dec 23, 2010 8:39 AM PST up reply actions
That's true, however, at the end of the day, Moss would have been fine had them used him properly..
It’s hard to come from winning and start losing, who QB’s for Moss, “Brooks” ? If the Raiders can get themselves with Coaching that opens up the Offence and provides a shutdown Defense, even the bad character types will strive. My concern SOB is talent and execution right now. You and I are on the same page, when I say character, I don’t mean a player that disrupts the locker room, I just mean someone with an attitude. TO type so to speak, I am for players like that with the Raiders…We’re the Raiders…lol It’s what always gave us an edge. I would like to see us as Raiders do our part and win out, and then see where the cards fall. Stay motivate and kick ass and keep going…Go Raiders!!!!
’
by Rodney Sacramento on Dec 24, 2010 7:43 AM PST up reply actions
It's just that quiting - no matter the circumstances - seems unRaider-like. The Raiders, even playing as a team, have
been comprised of “individuals” with their own unique internal angst that they’d successfully sublimated into the game. So no matter what the game outcome they were a force and a presence. That’s why I can’t forgive Moss b/c he hid his treasure, buried it in the ground, and chose to play the spoiled talented diva rather than Sisyphus.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"We had to get back to who we are, and that's physical and smash-mouth." - Robert Gallery 12/5/2010
by Sons-of-Blanda on Dec 24, 2010 3:51 PM PST up reply actions
That's true SOB, at the end Moss could have come in and been a beast, a positive vocal leader
and force domination. I understand you completely on that note, however, is that in him. It seems he thrived on teams that already had good leadership and systems. It’s easy to lead and be vocal when you organization is winning. I think that shows now, because Moss left the Patriots and is now sitting at home because no one wanted to put up with his non-sense. Go figure…..
by Rodney Sacramento on Dec 24, 2010 6:35 PM PST up reply actions
Tennesse beat KC a couple of years ago by 30 points I believe in KC and they still have Chris Johnson.
If he plays this game like the AFC South is on the line, gets something like 200+ all-purpose yards, and Kerry Collins doesn’t revert back to his Oakland form and lose it they have a legit chance. Can’t Moss also act like he’s got a contract to play for and showcase himself for once as well? The same goes for Cinci. Carson, Ced Benson, and Ocho Cinco are all gone as well as Marvin Lewis but they still should be playing to show they still have some trade value. James Joseph may also go on the open market so he should play like a cover corner who wants to get his. This is their best chance to do so against a playoff-caliber (eyes rolling) team in front of 40,000 Ohioans freezing their teets off.
Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.
If Joseph bounces from Cincy
he’d look pretty good in silver and black.
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Dec 23, 2010 8:37 AM PST up reply actions
This WILL be a huge game for Raider Nation.
K.C. and S.D will get beaten this weekend. The game in K.C. WILL be for the Western Division Championship. We will play and beat the Ravens in Oakland , in the first round of the playoffs. Saw it all in a campfire session last sunday as we were winning our must game against the Broncos. Anybody watch the Colt’s game last Sun? The team that “Can’t run” , broke off a long TD run? Like WE are prone to giving up every once and a while? YES , concentrate on shutting down Manning and his depleted WR corps. Treat Tamme like he was Antonio Gates, tell our LB’s to pay attention to the run and we will be in the afformentioned situation above. K.C & S.D. go DOWN this weekend. R.F.F.R.
HELL YEAH!!!
Honestly though we really only NEED KC to lose to Tennessee in the AM, that way our Colts game in the afternoon, and (assuming we win) the KC game next Sunday, will ‘matter’. It’d be awesome if SD loses to Cincy as well, but it’s not as critical. Honestly I’m kinda resolved that it’s unlikely we’re gonna catch SD cause Cincy and Donks both suck so bad. I’ll settle for having our last two count for something, going 9-7/6-0, keeping the Queefs out, and rooting for Denver next Sunday afternoon … let the chips fall where they may.
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed 100%
But anything can happen. If we can’t go I hope we can make these red-clad simpleton trollfucks cry all over their derrick thomas jerkoff rags. Never thought I’d want anything positive to happen for rivers and his gang but ill take them 100 times over the gaggle of midwestern tards that have emerged from their trailer parks to purvey their fourth grade bullshit.
by lchristmas on Dec 23, 2010 3:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Word ...
Truth told, I’ve always hated the Queefs a lot more than the Chargers. I’ll take knocking their punkasses out of the playoffs at Analhead … no matter who gets to go instead.
At least SD is a pretty sweet city … plus it’s Cali … and I suppose we do need SOMEone representin’ Westside.
Another side benefit is that it’s become an entertaining tradition at this point watching Norm and Phyllis eat a fat choad come January.
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 4:10 PM PST up reply actions
+ 1
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"We had to get back to who we are, and that's physical and smash-mouth." - Robert Gallery 12/5/2010
by Sons-of-Blanda on Dec 24, 2010 2:35 AM PST up reply actions
Yet another reason to hate the Broncos
Raiders beat the Colts, fairly easily. The Titans pull it out for us!! We are all super excited going into Arrowhead. We pull out the victory next week, completing the division sweep!! And then, right on cue, the stupid fucking Donkeys get killed by the Chargers. GOD I HATE THE BRONCOS!!
We gotta win this game and the KC game ......
The Titans and Cincy need to get the Queefs and Chokers we have one more chance with the Chokers if Denver pulls one out their ass seasons end I hope it becomes a showdown at Arrowhead that shit will be amazing ! As it stands now I want the 6-0 against the division that would be sweet. Also no North Tijuana Super Chokers in the playoffs ( I live in SD fuck their gay worthless loser fuck fans )! GO RAIDERS!!!!
Bongsmoke
My thoughts
Even if there is no chance of going to the promised land this year, this is a must win situation. We can show the NFL that we can beat more then the AFC West and some scrubs. If anything we can put a lingering thought within the next two games that we are fucking BACK
However I think we are going to the playoffs. I’m not going to use any stats but just look at what is happening in the NFL.
The Vikings were super bowl bound at the beginning of the season, and now they are licking the bottom of the barrell.
The 49ers were projected to win their division…..And still might….But they do have 5 wins.
The Bengals are 3 and forever and they were supposed to be big shit.
Detroit still sucks…..at least some things never change.
My point is this is a crazy, crazy year. Who’d have guessed that the Chiefs would have been a division leader at this point of the season? I have this thing in my guts telling me next week is going to be for the Division Title. We’re gonna get there.
by TheDudeAbides138 on Dec 23, 2010 3:44 PM PST reply actions
I like yer style, Dude ...
But do ya have ta yooz s’many cuss words? ;)
Honestly, there’s one thing that’s making me hold onto a shred of hope … that’s the fact that the Titans will still be mathematically alive when they play KC on Sunday morning. And they are not a ‘bad team’ by any stretch… you really can’t totally suck AND start out 5-2.
I think they could well do this thing. Then we can do ’em a solid in return and take out the Colts to keep them alive (j-ville has to lose as well though). I just want us to get to play two more meaningful games this season … win both, and see what happens with SD.
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 4:25 PM PST up reply actions
I counted two
You shoulda read the draft I was gonna use first. That one had too many cuss words in it. The post was edited haha.
by TheDudeAbides138 on Dec 23, 2010 4:57 PM PST reply actions
Dude ... you were s'posed to say ...
“What the fuck are you talking about, man?”
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
I know I know
Beleive me it was my first instinct to use that one. But I do love and respect my fellow brethren and would hate to really make a brother in arms upset over bad language of all things.
by TheDudeAbides138 on Dec 24, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
Unfortunately, the basic probability equation doesn't work well for us
If we ignore the quality of teams, and the order of events, and just do a basic probability analysis, we looking at the following equation:
.5 (chance of Tenn over KC)
x .5 (chance of Oak over Indy)
x .5 (chance of Oak over KC)
x .5 (chance of SD losing 1 of 2)
= .0625, or 6.25% likelihood of occurring, or roughly 1 in 16 times we would see a scenario like this occur.
And although the first three are reasonably .5 chance in ‘real life’ looking at the teams, I’d say the last one is much lower than .5 given the utter shit teams the Dolts have the luxury of playing to end the season.
We are actually sitting just one ‘notch’ prettier than the Titans, who have an additional .5 multiplier in their probability analysis, and thus are looking at a 3.125% chance of making it in.
I advise against anyone getting their hopes up TOO much AFA making the playoffs goes. However, the chances of at least getting to play in a HUGE game in KC next week for a SHOT at the title … are much better at 1/4.
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 4:58 PM PST reply actions
I'ma revise my calcs ... these are more correct I think ...
.5 (chance of Tenn over KC)
x .5 (chance of Oak over Indy)
x .5 (chance of Oak over KC)
x .75 (chance of SD losing at least 1 of 2)
= 9.375%, or nearly as good as 1 in 10.
My mistake before was failing to properly account for the fact that Dolts have two chances to lose. Their chances of winning both must be .5 × .5 = .25, therefore the chance of their NOT winning both (the number we’d use in the Raider calcs) must be .75, not .5.
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 6:37 PM PST up reply actions
all stats, numbers and equations aside
I think we have a good chance of doing this! and honestly forget the playoffs because even if we make it in it would take a miracle for us to go all the way. (I don’t like it but its the truth) more importantly in the long term picture is going 9-7 and 6-0 in the div! these are things that bode well for the future of our beloved Raiders! and in all honesty are really more important.
"Just Win Baby" is not a philosophy, it is a way of life!
Hey, if we actually got in ... with these kinda odds against us right now?
At that point I say we got some weird destiny thing going, where anything could happen …
Remember 2008? The NFC Championship Game ended up being the 9-7 Cardinals vs. 9-6-1 Eagles (4th and 6th seeded teams), with the Cardinals hosting the game!?!
by Brett J Valjalo on Dec 23, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions
Hard choice on the vote, DMC, or Ford power tough !!!
I can see Ford getting big yards on the short slant patterns, But I also see McFeezy going yard on swing passes and screen plays, especially if they load the box !!! Tough choice. On Defense, TOMMY KELLY, PLEASE COME DOWN, and I mean come down hard on Peyton. He’s should be considered, if not for the ProBowl, Most Improved Player this year, and I’m talking for the league, not just on the team !!! And as you guys know, I was not a big fan of his, But this year, that MAN has earned his paycheck !!!! Enough said !!! Bac to the O. If Schilens is back, and I mean ALL the way back, going over the top is going to be NO problem, with Sanders out. The Mid Middle of the field will be wide open, which will open the deep threat for Murphy, Ford, and yes, DHB !!! Oh and let’s not forget about Zac and Reece !!! Do all of the above, all we’re doing is hoping the Titans has beat the crap out of KC !!!
Speaking of being back, Is Big Rich Seymour playing ????
If the completely lucky, talentless, undeserving, steroid-enhanced and ugly Chiefs do win on Sunday
Please quantify these accustations for me. What make the Chiefs lucky? Talentless or undeserving?
…and steroid enhanced? My God.
That’s fine, Oakland fans, you guys can hate the Chiefs all you want, call them all the ugly names your pathetic juvenile minds can muster up, but the truth is, Chiefs are going to the playoffs, and for the 9385th time in a row, Oakland will not.
by craig in calgary on Dec 24, 2010 1:12 PM PST reply actions
Hey Craig....
I like how you are all high and mighty about us Raider fans trashing a RIVAL team on OUR board, and then responding with insults to the fans.
And with that being said why don’t you go flip a hockey puck around and eat some jelly’s eh? See that? I can stereotype too.
And as for a Chiefs fan in Canada…..Hell I don’t even know what to say about that except this must be what it’s like to crossbreed a retarded buffalo and a monkey on acid. Maybe you should stick to the CFL and their mutant rulebook, because you sure don’t know anything about the NFL, considering the Chiefs sterling playoff record in the last 10 years. We’ve actually been to a Superbowl this century.
So take it on back to the Chiefs board, or whatever hockey board you belong too. You obviously have no business on this one.
by TheDudeAbides138 on Dec 24, 2010 2:00 PM PST up reply actions
Who knew that midwestern CANADA
was filled with clueless douchetwits as well
“please provide documentary evidence for your over the top insult on a sports blog”
What a humorless tool you must be.
Also, since you wanted to come over and play logic professor, let me point out that you don’t know what “quantify” means
Now go back to arrowhead pride and cry about how we were mean to you, you inbred prairiebilly
by lchristmas on Dec 24, 2010 3:40 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
LETS GO RAIDERS !!!
pull out the victory and help us out, the colts are not that good..Let me tell you as soon as Austin Collie got hurt and left the game, their offense was virtually a non-threat. They got one lucky Donald Brown run, the passing game was completely shut-down, Reggie Wayne + Pierre Garcon were non-factors..You guys have 2 great corners and should do a good job.Hope you guys win at home, GOOD-LUCK BLACK AND WHITE !
You know, I actually like the Jaguars and hope they move to LA. The Raiders have a loyal and large base there but your
team could stimulate that huge indifferent population and make more revenue than in northern Florida. Right now, what is it, three states with 3 teams? NY, CA and FL. Still mind boggling that Misery has 2 NFL teams.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"We had to get back to who we are, and that's physical and smash-mouth." - Robert Gallery 12/5/2010
by Sons-of-Blanda on Dec 25, 2010 12:36 AM PST up reply actions
jaguars are here to stay, 0 blackouts this year my friend..
and other teams failed to do that.. Cincinnati, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, and San Diego all had trouble over us. WE STAY IN FLORIDA !

by 


































