Why You Can Forget About Rolando McClain
The Oakland Raiders seemingly have many different directions available in the 2010 NFL draft this April. That is the case when you pick eighth overall and you have a lot of needs to fill. One player that we've discussed a lot within this community here is Rolando McClain, a middle linebacker from the Alabama Crimson Tide. Today, McClain showed off some of his skills at his pro day. His 40 time was just a 4.74 the first time and then a 4.71 a second time, two times the reports suggest as "acceptable." Unfortunately, those times are why you can forget about Rolando McClain.
Hit the jump and then vote on the poll.
As I mentioned above, this team has a lot of needs and there a lot of possible directions in which Al Davis could go. McClain is one of the many players we've discussing taking with the eighth overall pick. Other positions of great need include offensive tackle and defensive tackle, two positions that feature players that are within our reach with the eighth overall pick. Greg Ellis' release and Richard Seymour's age could have Al Davis thinking defensive end as well and we know cornerback isn't our most solid position outside of Nnamdi Asomugha. With all of that and McClain's not-so-fast 40 time, I don't expect Al Davis to really consider McClain with the eighth overall pick as much as I would love to have him donning the silver and black colors.
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
Probably wouldnt happen no matter
When was the last time we took a LB in the 1st round that high in the draft? Ok dont answer that I know the answer. For the most part we draft spped guys (WRs and CBs) I would say. I am sure when I write the following statement someone will do the research because I am too lazy. If we break it down by general position not too specific ie OL not G, OT, C. The greater % would suggest more player drafted at skill positions with speed as a major/moderately high component. Not to say MLB is not that but if McClain isnt fast….forget it Al’s wet dream is over about the possibilities. However look at Urlacher and whats his name from Miami that played there and was solid for a few years. They are not super fast but good reading skills and freak beasts.
Now having openly pondered that I now have decided to go home have a few drinks, play the lottery and then I will know when I win the lottery what Al Davis has cooked up in the brain of his, because no one knows for sure and the vocal cords have been severed in Alameda so no one but he, himself and him know for sure who will be #8 overall.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Mar 10, 2010 1:24 PM PST reply actions
Oakland has taken a Linebacker in the 1st Round twice:
Napoleon Harris and Rob Fredrickson
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 10, 2010 3:01 PM PST up reply actions
I seriously doubt we will take Rolando with the 1st pick - in fact, I doubt we'll be taking any linebacker on day one
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 10, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions
+1
Well I am sure you are right and I am fairly positive that its going to be a CB/DB taken first. God help me I just hope its a sound rational decision that most people would project close to our draft position OR is a good fit for our needs and far off the mark draft position wise.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Mar 11, 2010 6:00 AM PST up reply actions
I really think we are going with an OT with the first pick.
We let go of Green and All we have now is Barnes, Henderson, and Walker (I think that’s all). Plus Cable is a line coach and there are some pretty good OT’s in this draft.
As far as MLB goes I’m not really sold on McClain, but I am really hoping that we can some how pick up ANGERER.
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
Picked very unlikely, because he'll be gone.
OT will be our first pick; simply because of the most talented guy who will be there when we pick, and we will this time.
I’m a little horrified at what a top LT prospect’s contract will look like, which makes trading down to mid or late 1st or even into the 2nd perhaps the ideal thing to do, but find that highly unlikely as well.
Pretty sure it will be Davis, in round 1.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
I dunno
Al likes those skill guys especially if they have despite what the pundants say. I really think he’s thinking CB unfortunately because we have bigger needs in my humble opinion in my teenie tiny little brain.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Mar 10, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions
What about Jahvid Best (RB)...lol
Speaking with reporters, Best said he talked with Raiders assistants Kelly Skipper (running backs) and Jim Michalczik (offensive line) at the combine and believes his 40 time met with their approval.
"They did interview me," Best said. "I think I showed them Raiders speed."
per- JMac
The RaiderLaker
Best
He does have “Raiders speed” and will be a great fit for a team looking for a speed back with receiving skills.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 10, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
Oops
In my defense, I was supposed to be in the computer lab for government class. While I was, I had already finished the assignment and felt like posting this.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions
We'll let it slide this time RRS
always pay attention to your goverment teacher by the way as I hear they tend to be geniuses.
Best
I kinda was thinking he could be brought on as a kick returner if he’s that fast.
Best can return punts, and he can team with Yamon Figurs on kickoff returns.
That will free up Higgins to focus strictly on receiving…
But I won’t be terribly upset if we don’t draft Best.
by shadowfreder on Mar 11, 2010 6:20 PM PST up reply actions
Really?
But I won’t be terribly upset if we don’t draft Best.
The guy is a legitimate running back; however, if we draft Best, we’re spending a high second-round pick on a kick and punt returner. That’s stupid. We have two running backs and McFadden, one of our two running backs, can return kicks and punts.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 11, 2010 9:51 PM PST up reply actions
Not sure this will actually happen
But if I had it my way, my top 3 rounds would be:
1 = OT
2 = DT
3 = LB
So yeah if Jahvid is gone by then, no skin off my back.
by shadowfreder on Mar 12, 2010 8:14 PM PST up reply actions
I think it's still likely.
You can’t(and I hope AL agrees) dispute what he did as a college player, and his skills overall.
At the end of the day, if it is are NOT one of the top offensive tackles Oakland should
ignore them..Hopefully, Andrew Davis or Treat Williams will still be available at number 8, I don’t expect Okung to be there, however, if the Raiders pick any player other than a O lineman, just forget about winning..The three above rookies have the foot work strength and speed to start and excell as rookies. We need blocking!!! if Campbell is available, with our second round pick we should select him also. Look, the Raiders have wasted and blown off picks and free agents so long now, its time to just keep it simple. If Campbell is not there in the second round them go defense, third round Tebow if he is on the board and there is no other player that really should have gone much sooner, who cares about his throwing motion, the kid has the heart of a lion and works his but off, and he is a player. If the Raiders do not take a O Tackle with the first pick, we will go no more than 6-10 and forget about the future with NO BLOCKING>>>Sorry but no points means NO WINS!!! Sure we can use defensive help, however, our D is not bad, a little help from the Offense with help their stats…
by Rodney Sacramento on Mar 10, 2010 2:47 PM PST reply actions
Noontide is right!!! Al I don't think has ever drafted a linebacker with the first pick.
by Rodney Sacramento on Mar 10, 2010 2:48 PM PST reply actions
I believe
N. Harris was our 2nd 1st rd pick after our trade of Gruden
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
Breaking News
After cutting his pro day short, Rolando McClain revealed that he has Crohn’s Disease.
Jaguars QB David Garrard also has it. The inflammatory disease is treatable, but can cause abdominal pain and complications ranging from dehydration to arthritis. McClain has dealt with Crohn’s since his freshman year in high school. It probably won’t knock McClain out of the first round, but can’t help.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 10, 2010 3:09 PM PST reply actions
I don't think tht will hurt him too much...
It’s not good, but you bet he can get better treatment that will help him manage it better in the NFL. I think teams would be more concerned if he had shoulder or knee problems.
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
Umm, no, this CAN be a big problem, have u ever seen Garrard's bipolar-like play.
At times Garrard looks like a very good QB then at times he just flat out sux. It depends on the severity, i guess, but this can be a problem. Damn this is bad!
The RaiderLaker
Could that just be garrards shakey play?
Doesn’t really matter to me though cause I want an OT with the first pick then either a DT or MLB. I would really like to have Angerer and they say he can be had in the fourth. So that gives us time to get an OT, DT, and CB (or possibly another OL man).
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
I'd hate to see us overlook another productive player
because of a damn stopwatch
The Airman of Westwood
I dont mind
I want Joe Haden or a LT in the 1st. Then Sean Weatherspoon in the 2nd. Or Brandon Spikes.
If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?
- Vince Lombardi
It could be Haden if Cleveland doesn't take him
Otherwise it’s the best tackle there. Offensive, that is. McClain will be gone.
If I had my way, I’d trade out of the round or into the late first if Okung is (of course he will be) gone.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
I just love the idea of Joe on 1 side and Nnamdi on the other
You dont need a scary pass rush if the QB cant find a open reciever
If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?
- Vince Lombardi
I freaking love when the Raiders get coverage sacks!
Playing man 2 man! Are you kidding me? In the NFL? It would be happening sometimes too, but I only wanna see this guy at CB if we address the other weaknesses on the team. I’m tired of evaluating guys who are cleaning up after the dead weight. Fill the holes, and watch the talent we already know is here, show the rest of the world, and don’t put a young kid at an immediate disadvantage, because a dude ran fast and jumped high.
We do that, just this once, and I’m putting at least 500 to at least go to the big game>
I know this will get some responses! lol
People will think I’m on crack! But the chances of us actually addressing all the holes we mostly agree we have here, are slim to none, and most of us agree on that, too.
If we do, against my prediction, I’m dropping a G on my team to win the AFC! Sons, you can hold me to it if it happens!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
So if we address our problems?
Your putting money on us taking the division, then win till the Bowl? Wow haha Crazy prediction right there. Id say we could win our division, but I dont know about getting to the big game. But your right about us probably not filling our holes. 1st Rd. Taylor Mays
In Bruce We Trust
Considering we gave away 6 games through idiocy that we should have won - S.D 1, K.C. 1&2, Washington,
Cleveland and Baltimore – we could have been 11-5. So, playoffs – at least – are easily within reach if Cable and Russell would only disappear. Once in the playoffs, however, we won’t go far without significant improvement in the D interior line and O line. K.C. will be tougher, S.D. weaker, and Denver about the same. We meet and should beat the Lambs, Seagulls, Jags-in-Boots, 69ers, Fins, and the declining Stealers and yard-birds. Houston always plays us tough – like the Crows, they own us … and we can’t stop CJ, Jed, Granny and the other Klampetts with our present rush defense. Without Cable and Russell and with strong DT and OT upgrades – we could attain double figure wins.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 12, 2010 9:08 AM PST up reply actions
KC, SD, and Houston ... Squaws, StD and Rednecks
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 12, 2010 10:04 AM PST up reply actions
I doubt Mc Clain
was really on Al’s radar anyway. I figure Bruce Campbell will probably be the 8 pick. He has the height, weight , speed thing that Al loves, plus he has a huge upside and fits the ZBS and is in a "need " position.
I’m sure Rolando will go on to be the next Ray Lewis if we don’t sign him. I have already resigned myself to Angerer in the 3rd or 4th round. This is a deep draft so what we do with the rest of our picks is the key
Voted Unlikely
Just for fun I researched what Ray Lewis’ and Brian Urlacher’s 40 yard times were and both were in the low 4.5’s.
With McClain’s 4.71, the many other pressing needs of the team, and trying to read Al’s mind, I am sure McClain is remote if even on the radar screen for the 1st pick.
Ray Lewis is the best LB to play in the NFL though
And Brian has had himself a great career as well. I just dont think Rolando will have that great of a career. I can see him being like Andra Davis or something, Who was released today btw
In Bruce We Trust

by 























