My Oakland Raiders High Five
Oakland’s youth movement is at a crossroads this year. It’s time for the young team to step in and establish itself as a major player in the AFC West division. Nobody is asking for championships as of yet, but it is crucial that the young Raiders prove to themselves and their ownership that they are on the right path this upcoming season.
It is a youth movement that started soon after the Super Bowl defeat in 2002. Soon after the loss, veterans like Rich Gannon, Rod Woodson, Tim Brown, Eric Allen, Jerry Rice, Bill Romanowski, and many others slowly dwindled away into the light of their retirement.
Oakland soon took steps towards ushering in a new era of Raider football. Seven consecutive 11 or more loss seasons have helped the Raiders obtain very good draft positioning for some time now.
Perhaps head coach Tom Cable put it best when he said the "weeding out" process is close to finished on his roster. "We kind of go to work for a common theme now, which is to succeed. And I don’t think you can do that if you have a bunch of knuckleheads. I feel good about our team. What I want to do is improve our team."
Now it’s time for a new group of Raider All-Stars to develop. Last year safeties Tyvon Branch and Michael Huff, tight end Zach Miller, cornerback Chris Johnson, and converted linebacker Trevor Scott stepped up in a big way for Oakland.
Let’s take a look at the guys whose 2010 stocks are on the rise in Oakland.
· Desmond Bryant was an undrafted rookie free agent defensive tackle from Harvard last year. As soon as Raiders fans saw him in action, they quickly learned his name. Despite his smallish girth, Bryant showed on several occasions last season that he is highly capable of playing against the double team next to Tommy Kelly.
Bryant impressed the coaching staff enough that they were willing to part ways with the starter last year, Gerard Warren. Despite a significant difference in opportunities with the starting team compared to Warren, Bryant ended up only three tackles shy of Warren’s total tackle tally.
In spite of his impressive rookie numbers, Bryant continues to be overlooked by sources outside the organization. However, head coach Tom Cable knows exactly who he is and the fact that he is already in Alameda working with new defensive line coach Mike Waufle at the Raiders headquarters bodes well for the Raiders and Bryant going into 2010.
· Wide receiver Johnnie Lee Higgins has been impressive when he gets the opportunity to start at wide out for the Raiders. I always thought Higgins would be an outstanding slot receiver, the likes of a Wes Welker type, only much faster in straight line speed.
But after watching Higgins perform, it is clear that he either feels more comfortable on the outside, or he is just plain better suited to play the outside. If you’ve followed Higgins career as a Raider, you may know that he does not like contact. He once said that’s why he scores so many touchdowns on returns; so he can avoid contact.
Higgins started the final five games of 2009 in place of injured Darrius Heyward-Bey, and totaled 13 catches for 214 yards. He also started the final three games of 2008, racking up 12 catches for 172 yards and three touchdowns in those games. Higgins personality could help the struggling Oakland Offense in the huddle as well.
· Oakland Raiders franchise quarterback JaMarcus Russell struggled early and often during his time as Oakland’s starting quarterback in 2009. Bruce Gradkowski, on the other hand, really established himself as a guy who fans could hold out hope for in 2010.
Bruce’s QB rating was well over 30 points higher than the 2007 first round pick. The former Toledo Rocket also threw six touchdowns and one interception in his four starts compared to Russell’s two touchdown tosses and nine interceptions in nine starts.
Gradkowski is also currently working out with his teammates prior to the scheduled off-season workouts which begin on Monday, March 15th. JaMarcus Russell is either receiving treatment for lethargy, or getting in shape while being trained by Olympic trainers in Arizona. It’s unclear at present which story about Russell is actually the truth.
· With the departure of veteran Greg Ellis, who spent a year on the Raiders roster as a defensive end and led the team in sacks with seven, Matt Shaughnessy is expected to step up and is profiled this week on Raiders.com series "Players on the Rise."
Shaughnessy is a second year end who did a really good job filling in for the often injured Ellis. Shaughnessy was very active in the final nine games of 2009 racking up 24 tackles, four sacks, and five tackles for a loss.
Shaughnessy said in his interview with Raiders.com that the transition from college to the pros went smoothly for him, "I was a little nervous going through OTAs and mini-camps, but once everything got going I got acclimated, and it was a really smooth transition. I became more comfortable."
· Perhaps the most puzzling move from the 2009 season, and certainly one of the more controversial decisions by the coaching staff was the choice to not start running back Michael Bush. Bush appears to be the most well rounded halfback on the roster, and even threw a couple of passes if I remember correctly.
The 6’1" 245 pound tailback is sometimes reminiscent of the great Bo Jackson, and has at times drawn such comparisons. Although Bush doesn’t possess the speed of Jackson, the raw power to run through tackles leaves fans longing for the good old days of "Bo Knows." Bush doesn’t have Jackson’s speed, but he can run away from defenders.
Bush owns the last three one hundred yard rushing games for the Oakland Raiders offense and has shined when given his fair share of the workload. He led Oakland in yardage gained (589) and yards per carry average in 2009 (4.8), despite having six less carries than the recently cut Justin Fargas who only played in 12 of the Raiders 16 games.
To put it in perspective, if the Raiders gave Bush 20 carries per game at an average of 4.8 yards per carry for 16 games, Bush would rush for 1,536 yards by season’s end. That’s nearly three times his total this year. Perhaps new offensive coordinator Hue Jackson can put this controversy to rest once and for all.
Alright, that’s my Raiders high five; five young Oakland Raiders players who deserve an opportunity to prove that they can play at an elite level in this league. Time will tell if the Raiders staff agrees with me.
3 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
I'm wondering
if Mitchell showed enough to use Huff as trade bait? He is his final year of his contract and he is more or less a one year wonder and due 1 mil his year (I think)
I know he played great this year but his contract is up!
.
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
The Missile made 1.9 mil last year - are you saying he's due for 2.9 this season?
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 14, 2010 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions
No
I thought he made 500,00 last season and was due 1.5 mil this season am I mistaken?
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
I stand corrected
Raiders coach Tom Cable stressed at the Scouting Combine that he believes FS Michael Huff has finally “arrived.”
In other words, the Raiders will pay Huff’s whopping $5.75M salary for 2010. Huff did finally show playmaking ability with three interceptions and 14 pass breakups last year, but he didn’t have a single pick after Week 2 and has never been a strong tackler. Oakland isn’t ready to admit its mistake of using the No. 7 overall pick on Huff five offseasons ago.
AS PER OAKLAND TRIBUNE
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
He is in the final year of his contract
is what I meant to say.
The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison
What are you talking about Blanda?
Why that’s the picture of a man who knows how to lead his team to defeat!
Wait
Alright, that’s my Raiders high five; five young Oakland Raiders players who deserve an opportunity to prove that they can play at an elite level in this league.
They’re not even great players yet. They’re not even good players yet. They’re above average and average players. Aren’t we jumping the gun on the “elite” label?
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 14, 2010 5:50 PM PDT reply actions
I think Grad will have a good year.
not great, but good. Bush… they need to have him run more, and then we’ll see how he does.
What about Chaz?
The guy is due for a breakout year
We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…
Agreed. I am much more excited about Chaz than Johnnie.
Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.
Great read again B.A.
Your optimism is much like my own, i also think Chaz could be a breakout wide receiver this year he looked great last preseason until the injury and then played pretty well under difficult circumstances coming in half way through the season. He is one (along with Murphy) guy who can make the hard catches consistently.
"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell
"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour
Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'
I saw a lot out of Bush and Shaughnessy they should be able to start. I am not sure if bryant is ready to take over he should be in the line up. I think Higgins is more of 4th wr’s he should be used more on punts and kick returns. I am maybe the only guy on this site that isn’t sure about bruce he played 3 games. I think if Al allows the coaches to run the team and blitz when needed we could maybe go 7-9. I don’t think we will make the playoffs until the qb problem is fixed. We need a top 20 qb or a denfense that can get alot of turnovers and score. we don’t create a lot of turnovers and we don’t have a top 20 qb.
There's nobody in this draft who could come in and serve us better than Gradkowski - certainly not in the 1st year
Even the most underrated and best all-round QB in the Draft – Dan LeFevour – would take at least a year to step in. I can’t even think of 5 QBs who ever had great rookie seasons (three are Matt Ryan, Stafford, P.Manning – that’s about it). It’s very rare in the NFL – even Kenny Stabler watched from the sidelines during the ’68, ’69, and ’70 seasons before making his showing.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 15, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I know but man it’s hard to think that we can win games without a top qb an offensive line. even if our defense doesn’t get any better than last year we still didn’t have a consistent offense. I know everyone going to say the steelers game but were was that offense the first 3 quarters. Russell is to inconsistent and has all the talent in the world. Bruce doesn’t have really that much talent but lays it all on the line. Bruce could lead us to maybe 8 games top if all the stars line up.
he was below average.
he was also injured.
right - and you had to reach all the way back in time to come up with examples
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 15, 2010 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions
How many rookie QBs have been drafted in the 5 drafts since then? How many of those dozens of QBs have done anything in there 1st year?
maybe a couple. Are you starting to get it? Is the light shining for you now?
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 15, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions
While there are exceptions, Rookie QBs, for the most part, rarely come in and make a positive difference ,
during their 1st year. It’s always been that way – thus I gave the Stabler example. So, for every Roethlisberger or Manning there are scores of QBs like Aaron Rogers who don’t positively contribute during their rookie year (in Rogers case.it wasn’t until his 4th year) and dozens more that never break out and cut it in the NFL ever.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 16, 2010 7:02 AM PDT up reply actions
+1
Wasnt Rothlessberger pushed into action too? I believe he was basically the only option left at the time because the 2 other QBs they had went down with injuries.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Mar 20, 2010 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Top rookie qb’s: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=list/rookieqbs
Stafford: 5 touchdowns while injured against the Browns (http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=291122008) – impressive toughness!
by Spirals galore on Mar 15, 2010 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Great Post!
Im expecting Bush to have a huge season next year, He has showed so much talent and its just waiting to be used. As for Bruce, The expectations are gonna be high, and Im almost positive he’ll live up to them
In Bruce We Trust
Fan Base
I would say that the Raiders are at the crossroads of losing their fan base this year too. They have to get better this year or 35,000 fans will be the norm at home games. Eight years is just too long to be a bad team.
My hope for Grad
All I want is competent play from Grad…if we can have that then teams will not stack the box against the run so much and then we will have an easier time to get the running game going and we can afford to take more chances on offense. He doesn’t need to be incredible or take the team on his shoulders but he has to make plays and be consistent. If we have a passing attack that can move the chains consistently then opponents will have to respect that and it will open up more holes for our RBs
"To me, MMA is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography and the dancers hit each other."
My List
I would list Chaz over Johnny Lee. i think that Chaz has the size and speed that the Raiders need. He chould be a great starter in this league, whereas i think that Higgins could be a great slot option.
I think that Bush should be the starter. I think that Bush is a great RB, loved him in college. I think that in a well designed offensive scheme, he and McFadden could be a great 1-2 punch similar to Kaufman and Wheatley a few years back.
I don't like JLH
…never did since I saw him fumble that ball in the endzone in preseason a couple years ago. But he did show up (relative) in the 08-09 season which changed my thinking on him. Until last year when he took the hit in the first game and was never really the same.
Chaz, on the other hand, will be great.
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
If JLH has put his "trauma" behind him he'll do fine - the guys blazing fast and doesn't drop many
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 15, 2010 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I know...
…just every time I start to get excited about the guy he does something stupid, like completely shutting down for weeks after getting hit in a football game.
In all fairness though that was a big hit and it never should have been thrown to him; JR has made his WRs pinatas out there sometimes.
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
Maybe if his standard was higher for one day he'd weed himself out
“Tom Cable…said the “weeding out” process is close to finished…We …work for a common theme now, which is to succeed (what was the theme before “winning” took its place?)… I don’t think you can do that if you have a bunch of knuckleheads."
I think everyone on this site is hoping Grad has the breakout year
Nothing impacts the team performance moreso than solid play from the QB. I personally believe since Fargas is gone (finally) & D-Mac is injury-prone that Bush is the most-realistic pick to have the breakout year IMO. However if Doc B can play in all 16 games & manage the game, not be spectacular like he was in the 4th against Pittsburgh, just manage the game this team will easily improve. I’m talking about Hostetler type numbers like 16 tds to 10 ints & about 3000 yards.
All except for a few Russell believers - but if a miracle happens and Russel "sees the light" I'll embrace the slop with them
by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 15, 2010 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
Totally agreed. I think I have better chance of someone leaving enough money to buy the Raiders than there is a chance of JaEatingChamp showing up in shape, ready to play, mind set on winning and no passing the buck….sorry. If he does I will say awesome.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Mar 20, 2010 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions

by 






















