Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

The Best Mock Draft.! I think...


Now dont just skim thru the picks i have made for each round. I have picked these players for a certain reason. And thank you a couple people on this site who inspired some of these choices and made me look deeper into these players. Enjoy.

 

Round 1: Rolando McClain ILB, 6'4" 249lbs. (Alabama)

 

This of course is one of the toughest picks to make because we dont have a clear cut pick. There is so many needs and we need to think of who we can acquire now and who will be there later to help this team. Some of the other posibilites include OT Trent Williams or another OT, DT Williams, or even CB Joe Haden or S Eric Berry. I feel there is a good class of OT in the draft this year so we should pick one up later, as for a DT i think Williams is too big of a reach at 8. I feel he is overrated just because of his size and potential to become a NT. And even though we would all love to have another shutdown corner opposite to Nnamdi, CB is not our biggest concern. I feel McClain is the best pick at 8 because he is the only complete ILB in this draft; he has good speed, strength, smart, hardworking, and can play both the pass and the run. Plus his body size is great for an ILB. There was other names being thrown around like Pat Angerer and Micah Johnson and although i like them I feel McClain is less of a risk. Pat Angerer is under-sized at 6 feet and around 230lbs. Yes he could bulk up but what if he doesnt? Micah Johnson has great size, and is fantastic against the run but lacks the speed and agility to keep up in the passing game and everyone knows this is a pass heavy league. We need an instant sure play maker, not more potential players.

 

Round 2: Jared Veldheer OT, 6'8" 312lbs. (Hillside)

 

What is not to love. He might be a bit of a reach but he has fantastic size and athleticism actually surpassing Bruce Campbell in everything except for the 40 time and bench pressed two less than Campbell. Veldheer is like the better underrated version of Bruce Campbell. Campbell is way over rated. Now this is potential.

Veldheer :    40 time: 5.06   Bench Press: 32   Vertical: 33.5   Broad jump: 109.0 in.   Shuttle: 4.51   Cone: 7.40

Campbell:    40 time: 4.75    Bench Press: 34   Vertical: 32      Broad jump: 101.0 in.   Shuttle: 4.69   Cone: 7.58

 

Round 3: Akwasi Owusu-Ansah CB, 6'0" 207lbs. (Indiana)

 

His potential in being a big time corner not only stands with his smarts and athleticism but also with his name. He was born in Ghana and his first name, Akwasi, means "Born on Sunday". I think that is pretty cool and its ironic how he ended up playing football. Akwasi has great athleticism even though it didn't show in the columbine which people think is due to off-season shoulder surgery. But the greatest thing about him is he is very Nnamdi like. In his Junior season he came up with 10 pass break-ups and 8 interceptions, one being returned for a touchdown. Of course the following year teams stayed away from Akwasi's side and finished with 27 tackles, 4 pass break-ups, and 2 interceptions. He also has great potential in the return game finishing his career with 7 touchdowns, 4 on punts and 3 on kick-off returns. Akwasi has great instincts, great hands, and great open field tackling, plays aggresive and smart, and can help out in the run game. Draft Akwasi.! Get rid of Routt.!

 

Round 3 (Morrison pick):     Torrell Troup DT, 6'3" 314lbs. (UCF)

 

This is the answer to our DL problems. Troup will fill our need at DT. I love this guy for several reason. He is a strong and can pick up double teams. He can collapse the pocket and stop the run or sack the QB. What I love about him though is that he has great character. Very very coachable and extremely hard working and will work to being the best he can be. He never gives up during a play constantly pushing to make the play. To shop his dedication in trying to build more stamina in his game and become an every down player he lost 30 pounds at the start of his senior season. See Russel, now thats how you're supposed to lose some real weight. Its called hard work, maybe you should try it.

 

Round 4: Dan LeFevour QB, 6'3" 230lbs. (Central Michigan)

 

Oakland has had a series of starters at QB that just haven't worked out since Gannon. There have been rumors of trading for McNabb and Rosenfals making the QB situation more unclear for the Raiders. I say screw both of them and draft this guy. He is a highly underrated QB probably due to playing for a school at the non BCS level. I think drafting QB's in the later rounds are great ideas due to the fact that they need to prove themselves. First and second round QB's are somewhat given the job. Though LeFevour is raw he is also a smart decision maker, not big arm but pretty accurate but even more importantly he is a fierce competitor and will work his ass off. So 1) smart decision maker 2) accurate 3) competative and 4) hardworking! Now thats a recipe for starting QB.

 

Round 5A: Eric Olsen C, 6'4" 306lbs. (Notre Dame)

 

C is a bit underrated. We forget that pretty much the entire OL is in question except for Gallery when he is healthy. Eric Olsen is a beast. He is tied for the strongest C in the draft and is probably the meanest. Olsen will not stop till he here's a whistle. Takes good angles on his blocks and is a leader and can take control of the line. He is very tough, been known to play through injury and has played OG on both the left and right positions and could be a great back-up or potential starter at C which he is more suited due to his physical attributes.

 

Round 5B: Alterraun Verner CB, 5'10" 190lbs. (UCLA)

 

I believe he will be available this round even though i don't understand why. Yes he doesn't seem to be the Raider size but he has that Raider speed. I think he would be a perfect fit for the slot postion due to his lightning quickness. He makes break on the ball with his incredible instincts and has that play maker ability the defense needs since being ranked close to the bottom if not the bottom in defensive turnovers. Though he is kind of small he is not afraid to help out in run support and make a tackle. But his career stats are impressive alone. 279 career tackles, 56 passes broken up, 13 interceptions and five touchdowns, four from interceptions and one from a blocked field goal. He is also very durable appearing in all 51 games for UCLA the past 4 seasons.

 

Round 6: John Conner FB, 5'11" 246lbs. (Kentucky)

 

We need a FB. It seems just cant stay healthy for more than a game and we dont have any good FB. John Conner is a punisher and will take you out if you get in his way. He can also run the ball for those short yards because he is very powerful up the middle. Though he is a traditional blocking FB he does have reliable hands and is quick to secure the ball off the pass. 

 

Round 7: Not really sure.. i would pick the best OG or/and possesion WR...

 

So that the draft. I think its beautiful but let me know what you think. Enjoy.

Poll
What do you think of this mock draft?
Perfect
19 votes
Pretty Good
61 votes
Alright
34 votes
some good picks
29 votes
WTF
17 votes

160 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 49 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Silver And Black Pride

Comments

Display:

Huh?

 Talk about some obscurity in the top of the draft.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Mar 30, 2010 6:18 PM PDT reply actions  

problem is there isnt any other complete ILB without some kind of problem…

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem with Rolando is he lacks that killers mentality and the warrior attitude

Why waste a 1st on a guy who wouldnt give it his all. I would rather take Angerer, Johnson, Weatherspoon or even Daryl Washinton

In Bruce We Trust

by Remix. on Mar 30, 2010 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

But he's one of those video studying junkies

he’s a hard worker… and i understand what you mean about the killer instinct but Angerer is undersized, Johnson is too one dimensional and has had multiple injury problems, Weatherspood an Washinghton play outside i believe… I actually really like Weahtherspoon but he’s an OLB and it would kinda be like drafting Morrison again being that Morrison also would have been a better OLB than ILB.

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

hmmm.

i just feel we need a sure pick. like someone you know can play that position and be the man like McClain. Personally i doubt he will be a superstar but i do believe he will be a solid player.

but if Weatherspoon can play ILB than shit lets draft down and get another round pick and draft him.

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

HOW much of McClain College play has to do with

Cody. I am not sure he would be so good with a space eat NT. Unless he is going to be Willis, Beason, or Mayo. I don’t think he is on those guys level of play and if we draft him who is going to coach him up. I don’t think picking a DB in the 3rd round is the answer. I love the DT but Unless we can get a sure steal I would draft a ot with #8 pick. I wouldn’t be mad if we take a Dan Williams in the 2nd round.

by Micheal Y on Mar 31, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Williams could be called "a closer" when he's near the ball he accelerates into it and squashes whoever

Watch Dan Williams

But scouts warn that he wears down in second half and has a “mediocre work ethic in past.” (how far back are they thinking?)

by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 31, 2010 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like it. I voted pretty good. I think McClain will prove some doubters wrong, and is the highest floor MLB there

with a decent ceiling too. I think Veldheer’s a bit of a reach in the second, but might not be there in the third, so a nice pick. I’ve loved Akwasi from the get go, who saw his stock fall due to injury questions, and some very old off the field stuff. High school in fact.

I also see a couple of these guys more likely Raiders picks than anything I’ve read on this site thus far, but many will disagree with me. You’ve addressed all the positions I’ve been harping on with guys that will at the very least be good NFL players at their respective positions. I don’t really understand the second corner, but if it’s for a return specialist and to replace Routt at CB, well, I’m with the whole replacing Routt part!

Not sure if Conner will still be there with the sixth pick, either, so maybe move him up to the fifth and rethink the UCLA corner.

I don’t see Olsen being there that late, either, but if he is, I’d take him in a heartbeat.

I agree. Best draft yet. A blend of what I’d want in addressing needs with realistic picks, and a couple likely guys; some are questionable to be where you’ve put them, but we can hope, can’t we? Some of the teams going qb and skills positions despite the depth this time around could have some guys reaching, leaving the players in the positions we need so badly to drop and gain value for teams like us.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Mar 30, 2010 6:59 PM PDT reply actions  

oh.! I agree about Veldheer too

he is a bit of a reach… if maybe we could draft down and receive an extra late round pick then that would be great.

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

i know right...

alot of these players were supposed to be around the rounds i put them in but it seems alot of these players stocks are rising up and alot. but yes one can dream.

its actually Ansah who is good on returns… but Verner (the UCLA CB) is quick and would play Routt position perfectly. He has that Asante Samuel potential where he can just step in front to snatch the ball. he has that playmaker potential which is why i picked him.

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 7:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Jared Veldheer (Hillsdale?) is a tail end 3rd or 4th round pick.

Veldheer is said to play down to his opponents… Doesn’t play with a consistent level of aggression… Needs to improve strength at POA… Gets too upright… Will give up on blocks too soon. Plus his level of competition hasn’t proved him.
McClain is lazy like most every other athlete from the DS and will slouch in the NFL – he’s easy going and lacks a killer instinct despite his athletic talent and football IQ.

Akwasi Owusu-Ansah is good once he has the ball in his hands but played mostly in zone coverage and comes from a Division 2 school. Plus he played a lot of safety and is considered “rather raw at the cornerback position.”
Like Stanford Routt, its said that Owusu doesn’t attack the ball and would rather sit in coverage but still manages to get beat deep; I also came across this: “Needs to be more physical (Wussi?) and could be a great press corner, but he seems to prefer to play off the ball.”

I like your choices of Troup, LeFevour, Olsen and Conner. Verner may be a good value but isn’t too fast or strong but is considered smart, tries hard, good attitude and played 4 years at UCLA.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 30, 2010 7:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Veldheer doesn't make into the late third round

and Akwasi is more NFL ready for man to man than many guys I’ve looked at. (other than Haden, of course). As much as I love your man from Cal, I don’t see him going ahead of Owusu-Ansah, strictly due to size.

You could be right about these guys, but I’ve heard there is some interest from some pretty good squads on Sirius radio, at least for Veldheer and Akwasi. Nothing much official, so I’ll leave it alone, but I agree with the speculation about at least those two guys.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Mar 30, 2010 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beadles is a beast

 He will be a great NFL lineman. I like Eric Olson, too——I don’t think he will make it to the 5th, though.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Mar 30, 2010 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah Me Too

But he is probably going to go in the 3rd round.. and i prefer Ansah in the 3rd.

by ButtMunch on Mar 30, 2010 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

our needs are..............................

a dt, ot, mlb, cb and a rb. i would like 2 of dt, 2 of ot and 1 of each of the others

by sports with steve on Mar 30, 2010 9:18 PM PDT reply actions  

We all know the needs, but RB isn't one of them.

Why clog the position more? We have 2 great backs there who each complement eachother. Another would just eventually get cut or worse, take carries away from our boy Bush

In Bruce We Trust

by Remix. on Mar 30, 2010 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rodger Saffold > Jared Veldheer

Not a fan of the McClain pick. He is a product LB. Granted very talented but the scheme centered around him. Would he improve the Run D? Yes. But he would hurt us more in coverage. I like the way Morrison improved against the run this year. With that said I would rather just keep Morrison. Can you name the last 4-3 MLB to be taken in the top 10?

Not a big fan of this mock.

"I need a couple A's for Q's, I'm not an Asshole I'm just a little confused"
-Aesop Rock

by DarthDavis on Mar 30, 2010 10:24 PM PDT reply actions  

McClain

if there’s that much uncertainty at #8 over a player than history tells us he’s the wrong player. DHB is just too fresh on my mind. It has to be a slam dunk, impact player who can dominate at whatever position. Raiders trade up not down but in this case, we need to consider trading down and picking up more picks including another for 2011 as we dealt that pick last year.

by raiders4liffe on Mar 31, 2010 2:28 AM PDT reply actions  

number 6

i would take a wide reciever in the 6th not a hb remember al davis is good at drafting in the later rounds and cable was saying we are using two runningbacks this season so mcfadden and bush get more carrys

by gradkowski ftw on Mar 31, 2010 7:53 AM PDT reply actions  

I voted pretty good. If Lefevoure is there in the 4th rd take him.

I just don’t think he is going past round 3 though. There are some good tackles to be had in the 2nd I would prefer over the gentleman you mentioned. All the other picks look solid. I am a huge fan of Olsen at Center. I can see him being our starting center on opening day.

by TAW on Mar 31, 2010 9:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Pretty good

you especially sold me with the two 5th round picks.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on Mar 31, 2010 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm so glad more people are in support of Conner

…It would actually make my draft day if we pick him up (mostly because I know I will be disappointed early on). I don’t agree with McClain, I say we get the best OT at that point. We really need to build the lines in this draft especially with who our QBs are and with our lack of production in the run (which is also why I want Conner). If we can keep our QBs upright longer we give players like DHB more time to break away from coverage.

I also don’t agree with taking a QB in this draft. We have JR, Grad, and Frye. JR is not going to be cut despite the millions of cries for his head. Grad will provide a solid year or two of play for us as a starter and Frye is the quintessential 3rd-string-QB (assistant TO THE QB coach). We need these draft picks to build elsewhere (read:both sides of the line). Also, I’m pretty sure that Oakland has one of the worst records for drafting QBs in the league.

Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!

by SBcitizen on Mar 31, 2010 12:27 PM PDT reply actions  

exactly

Davis picks arm, thats all that matters to him and usually big arm is linked with poor acuracy which doesnt cut it in the NFL. plus we pick QB’s with bad character but LeFevour has accuracy and the determination to work at being the best he can be.

by ButtMunch on Mar 31, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

True, but realistically...

We won’t draft a QB as long a JR is on the roster. To draft a QB, even in the middle rounds, is admitting that JR is not the future. There is no reason to bring in a QB (from the draft) with our current lineup. Grad and Frye a great backups and are paid correctly; plus they played a year in our system already and presumably have some chemistry with the receivers already. JR, for some reason, is still seen as the future and gets the pay for it. There is no room for a rookie QB on the team.

Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!

by SBcitizen on Mar 31, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Some good picks

I don’t think we need 2 CBs from this draft. Dan Lefevour is gonna be a great NFL quarterback, but I doubt that he falls to the fourth round. If he does I would say grab him. Depending on who is still there when we get to the eighth pick, I would be happy with Rolando.

by iBleedSnB on Mar 31, 2010 12:37 PM PDT reply actions  

I definately want us to draft Lefevour and Olsen

the other guys not so much

If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.

by Parental Advisory on Mar 31, 2010 12:45 PM PDT reply actions  

If we can treat this draft just focusing on the trenches much like the 49ers 1980 draft when they focused on secondary, I would gain so much respect back for Al.

We need to focus on DT and any offensive line postions this year. If we just use the top rounds on those needs only from 1st until 3rd or 4th this draft would be successful. The fact Al is recognizing those as points of weakness that need to be addressed immediately means he has changed for the better.

by TAW on Mar 31, 2010 1:53 PM PDT reply actions  

i disagree with that last part

Al Davis seems to play to our needs just doesnt pick the right person for that job. We needed a QB, we drafted a QB in ’07… but he was a stupid pick because you cant have a lazy QB… and an even closer example would be last year, we needed a WR. we got one. just not the right one. though i am a supprter of DHB we either should have traded down or drafted a better more secure WR than a project.

by ButtMunch on Mar 31, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Al's picks would work great in Madden (funny how that works out).

A QB with a 99 in throwing power throwing to a WR that’s tall with a 99at in speed. Accuracy and Catching doesn’t matter, too bad it only works in video games and not the NFL.

Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!

by SBcitizen on Mar 31, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I never thought DHB was the pick at that point even if we traded down for him.

We had a chance to get Eugene Monroe or BJ Raji & passed on both of them. Again if we focus the early rounds on the trenches & go after skill positions in the later rounds it means he has woken up. Same goes for the year prior. I thought D-Mac was an ok pick but I was mad considering KC picked up Glenn Dorsey at the time. Again the trenches need to be the primary focus & then the other picks ala QB, WR or RB.

by TAW on Mar 31, 2010 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Funny you should say this because we've come all the way around the circle since January 5th when almost everyone

was saying the same thing, “Get Linemen” , “Fix the trenches” “no more specialty players” etc. Then we got diverted with QBs, WRs, and LBs. Still, it comes down to who will help the team most and just because we need an OT doesn’t mean there’s one in this draft for us. Whereas, a true Guard, true Center, true CB are available and we still pick up a DT in the 2nd.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Mar 31, 2010 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a long offseason of nitpicking

but I still believe our biggest needs are Offensive & Defensive Tackles

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on Mar 31, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

completely agree.

our offensive and defensive lines are crap…
we cant seem to consistently protect our QB and the run game was horrible this year…
as for our DL we need a NT. i dont like putting all the blame on Morrison because i think he’s fine, not amazing, but fine… our DT’s are not solid at all… how can we stop any run when they can just walk through our DT’s?

by ButtMunch on Mar 31, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

who is the 1st choice? dt or ot?

stop the bleeding at the run and drat a nt ordt. or do we draft an o tackle or guard with our 8th pick? what is our 1st priority?

by sports with steve on Apr 1, 2010 8:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Offensive lineman

Any quality OL will be a tremendous upgrade.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 1, 2010 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Iupati is the best lineman at #8 and even though OT is bigger need the quality of an OT compared to this G makes Iupati

the better choice – he’ll immediately contribute and be a Raider pro-bowler for years to come. Also, he might be able to learn the OT arts.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 1, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Iupati would be my selection here. He can already play guard and he has the mobility to play tackle, maybe even this season.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 1, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

I like Trent Williams

he’s played both tackle spots and center.. he was part of the best offensive line in college football.. thats something…
he’s smart and athletic.. I think he’d be a fantastic fit.. i like Iupati but that isnt our biggest concern and i think if we resign Langston Walker he’d be fine..

by ButtMunch on Apr 1, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

somebody really oughta send this blog to the Raiders personel people.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 1, 2010 4:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50