Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: FSU To Big 12 'Inevitable,' According To Report

By method or madness: discerning the intentions of Al

Let's try a different approach, basing Al's draft choices on candidates that the Raiders have actually gone to the trouble of calling in for a workout. If the intentions of Al et al. can be discovered from the following then, at least, we will be better prepared for what lies ahead. These players were all invited and came to workout in the presence of Al himself.

Center:

Maurkice Pouncey - Florida (HT: 6-4⅛  WT: 304  40: 5.23)   projected 1st - high 2nd round

Matthew Tennant  - BC (HT: 6-4½  WT: 300  40: 5.16) projected: 3rd round

Note: Here's a clear indication that Center is high priority that most of us were not emphasizing enough. I for one was looking ahead to Wisniewski next year but would be ecstatic with a solid Center. No Raider team has gone far without a great Center such as Barrett Robbins, Don Mosebar, Dave Dalby, Jim Otto (5 Super Bowls with these Centers and none without.  

 WR:

Golden Tate - Notre Dame (HT: 5-10¼  WT: 199  40: 4.42)  projected 2nd round

Trent Guy - Lousiville (HT: 5-8  WT: 171   40: 4.52) projected: 7th round or untaken

Note: Be prepared for a WR in the 2nd round; perhaps the next Tim Brown.

 MLB:

Jamar Chaney - Mississippi St. (HT: 6-0¾  WT: 242  40: 4.54)  projected 3rd round

Note: Not a horrible choice in the 3rd even though Jamar is not a hard hitter and although he played college ball in the Deep South, he grew up safely away from ts corrosive influences.

 Defensive Tackle:

Tyson Alualu - California (HT: 6-2⅜  WT: 295 -40: 4.87) projected: 3rd - 4th round

Note: We've only brought in a single DT and he lives 10 miles away. This does not bode well unless we are set on him.

OLB:
Dekoda Watson - Florida State (HT: 6-1⅜  WT: 240  40: 4.56)
 projected: 4th round

DE/OLB

Jerry Hughes - TCU (HT: 6-2   WT: 255  40: 4.69) projected: 3rd round

Daniel Te'o-Nesheim - Washington (HT: 6-3½ - WT: 263 - 40: 4.75) projected: 6th round

Offensive Tackle:

Marshall Newhouse - TCU (HT: 6-3¾  WT: 319  40: 5.00) projected 6th round [note: reports that he will be converted to Guard in the NFL)
Kevin Haslam - Rutgers (HT: 6-4¾  WT: 304)  projected: 7th round

Nic Richmond - TCU (HT: 6-7  WT: 310)  projected 7th round

Note: Could one of these hidden gems make us forget Trent Williams and, in Newhouse's case, Iupati and become the answer to our prayers?

CB:

Leroy Vann - Florida A&M (HT: 5-9  WT: 188)  projected 7thround  

Note: Would Stanford Routt, if nobody else, be delighted with this acquisition?

Safety:

Chad Jones - LSU (HT: 6-2⅛   WT: 221  40: 4.57)  projected: 2nd - 3rd round

Stevie Brown - Michigan (HT: 5-11  WT: 212  - 40: 4.52) projected: 7th round

Andrew Sandejo - Rice (HT: 6-1  WT: 221) projected: 7th or untaken

Note: Men have far worse fetishes than Safeties.    

Quarterback:

Sean Canfield - Oregon State (HT: 6-3¾ - WT: 223  40: 4.99)  projected: 6th round

Mike Kafka - Northwestern (HT: 6-2⅞  WT: 225  40: 4.93)  projected: 6th round

Jonathan Crompton - Tennessee (HT: 6-3  WT: 225  40:  4.89) projected: 6th round   

Note: We do not have a 6th round pick so be looking for one of these in the 7th.

RB:

Curtis Steele -  Memphis (HT: 5-11-0  WT: 190  40: 4.60)  projected 7th round

Note: the antithesis of a FB and not what many of us were hoping for in the 7th.

Love it or hate it, things may go like this:

Star-divide

Round 1 (draft pick #8)  Center: Maurkice Pouncey

Maurkice-pouncey-300x200_medium

Round 2 (draft pick #39)   Wide Receiver: Golden Tate

Golden-tate-heisman_medium

 

Round 3 (draft pick #69)  Middle Linebacker: Jamar Chaney

Ncf_a_chaney11_600_medium

 

Round 4 (draft pick #116) Defensive Tackle: Tyson Alualu

Tysonalualu_medium

 

Round 5 (draft pick #148)  Offensive Tackle: Marshall Newhouse

Guard_display_image_medium

 

Round 7 (draft pick #225) Quarterback: Mike Kafka

Mikekafka_medium

Poll
Will you be content if the draft goes into the books like this?
YES, I will be content
97 votes
NO, I will be discontent
327 votes
NEUTRAL, I accept it with indifference
147 votes

571 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Pouncey would be great, but not at 8.

Also, they need to get a T that can start this year. I have never seen him play, but I am guessing Newhouse isn’t ready for this.

Whatever they do, I want to see them maximize their value. If Pouncey is the guy, great get him, but trade down and pick up an extra pick.

I am really torn on the Tate pick. On the one hand, I think he would be a good addition, but on the other hand I want lineman.

Good research SoB.

Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.

by Rich Langford on Apr 13, 2010 4:27 PM PDT reply actions  

I doubt they’ll take Pouncey. I think Satele will get 1 more year. Besides that, there are far worse problems on our O Line than Center. Far Worse. Pop Warner D Ends will kill us on one side. Nuff Said. Pray for Iupati, or sell yer soul for Suh.

by the red guy on Apr 14, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well Said

Phillip Rivers Is A Fag.

by JaKe. on Apr 14, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess this draft fills most of our needs except fullback

This is not how I would go about filling needs, but Al has never done things the way I would anyhow. Pouncey is an interesting pick and Golden Tate is a real talent, I just didn’t think WR was that much of a need. We all know how Al loves his receivers.
All in all It could go a lot worse than this. So I’ll take it. If this is how it goes.

Thanks Sons for the different perspective

by rambis64 on Apr 13, 2010 4:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Yup.

With the current offense, a fullback would be invaluable. Of course, we have a new guy in the offensive wheelhouse.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 13, 2010 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

a fullback is a must at some point whether it be draft or a decent FA.

"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell

"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour

Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'

by Ozraider on Apr 13, 2010 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we are going to reach for an O-Line position other than Tackle at 8 is has to be for Iupati and no one else

We don’t need a receiver in the second………..i ve said that this would be a very hard draft to screw up, this would be one way of screwing it up.

If we had this draft but got Iupati in the first and Pouncey in the second i could live with that.

"Mel Kiper has his opinion and I respect it. But what does it mean? My 9-year-old nephew can watch film and make an opinion. I think I value the opinion of scouts who get paid to make their opinions. It will carry me through my career. It will serve as motivation for me." - Mike Mitchell

"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour

Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'

by Ozraider on Apr 13, 2010 5:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Pouncey in the second would be perfect...

I am really hoping for at least 3 OL out of this draft.

Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.

by Rich Langford on Apr 13, 2010 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

They better fix what’s wrong with with DHB before they draft ANOTHER receiver. Or even convert DMF to wide out.

by rightnasty on Apr 14, 2010 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

If we draft another WR in the 1st round I will scream at the top of my lungs to try and blow out AD’s ears. That is the last pick we need to make.

Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!

by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Apr 14, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

If some of those guys you got there go undrafted, we should invite them to try and make our squad. It’s worth a try.

by Walker Wallace on Apr 13, 2010 5:39 PM PDT reply actions  

sorry, I'm not with it

No Guards picked at all, and O-Tackle is not picked until the 5th round. I like the idea of bringing in a Center, but not sure is a good value with the #8 pick. If this included a trade back to later in the 1st with an additional pick than I would be happier about it.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on Apr 13, 2010 6:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I have been saying many times that we should trade down to get as many picks we b/c there so many holes to fill. At least we’re pretty much set on WR, HB, TE, and QB(Bruce will do. I believe in him.) We also don’t need a K or P, so that leaves us OL, LB(MLB), a hard hitting D lineman, a decent CB to complement Nnamdi, and possibly FB. Did I miss anything?

by Walker Wallace on Apr 13, 2010 6:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Haden

I read somewhere today that he said one of the teams he has talked to the MOST was the Raiders.

Haden on the 1st round!

by KiwiRaiderFan on Apr 13, 2010 7:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I think this is the first pick, too

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Apr 13, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope you're right.

He’d be worth a pick at #8.

Snag Cody in the 2nd if he makes it, and our RT or MLB in the 3rd or 4th.

by xville on Apr 13, 2010 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

If the Raiders draft Haden at 8

they are going to have approximately a billion dollars wrapped up in cbs.

Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.

by Rich Langford on Apr 13, 2010 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

haha But imagine a CB duo of Haden and Nnamdi!

Joe would greatly learn and benifeit from playing next to one of the greatest CB’s to play the game. Nnamdi isn’t even 30 and is already a great. If he had another CB to complement him, he will soon be the greatest CB to enter the league.

In Bruce We Trust

by Remix. on Apr 13, 2010 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would love it!

And they could cut Routt’s sorry ass! I just don’t think it is happening. I am taking Routt’s tender as a sign they are not considering cb a big need, which sucks.

To me, great Raider teams start with awesome cb and line play.

Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.

by Rich Langford on Apr 13, 2010 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

They're definitely taking one, earlier than later

I’ve heard lots of interviews of corners, when asked who they’ve talked to and their best guess at who was most interested, the Raiders were in the group most often.

While they’ve done a great job of throwing smoke screens and feigning interest wherever possible, there have been signs of this being a priority in Oakland.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Apr 14, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haden would be a good pick!

Still like trading down for more picks 2 many holes.

The future is uncertain... and the end is always near. JMorrison

by S-n-B4life on Apr 14, 2010 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

If your thesis is correct,

all recent drafts must have had a private workout first. Is that the case?

by Spirals galore on Apr 13, 2010 8:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Not necessarily, but its clear that the Raiders seek to fill positions played by players they bring in

The rounds projected for those brought-in is an indication of how high (or low) they consider that position’s need.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 13, 2010 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

By virtue of that thinking, maybe the multitude of guys at certain positions suggests a trading down, and acquiring of additional later picks?

to take several options at those positions?

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Apr 13, 2010 9:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Sorry, but Maurkice is the only pick I would enjoy here.

And he’d be a HUGE reach at 8. If Oakland wants him that bad, then trade down and get another 3rd or something.

Otherwise, If the draft turns out like this, Id consider it a major fail! It fills the needed positions but the wrong guys at those positions.

Golden Tate is gonna be great at the next level, but another WR would clog the spot in Oakland. Jamar Cheney looks like he has back up quality, So Im not really high on him. Tyson Alulua looks awesome, But just not what Oakland needs again. He’s undersized and wouldnt do the needed job. That Tackle looks like shit, So I think that be the bigger failure of this proposed draft.

I sure hope the draft doesnt end up like this.

In Bruce We Trust

by Remix. on Apr 13, 2010 10:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Lower picks

As you all know, AD rarely trades down (don’t even have an example); however, he does a decent job finding players in lower rounds. Perhaps it’s his scouting dept who make those picks. With first 2 picks, rarely tips his hands by inviting players to camp. He’ll send a scout for a private workout. Howie Long always mentions how shocked he was by the Raiders picking him as the workout only lasted 5 minutes. AD clearly likes to reach in the 1st round. I can’t recall a guard or center getting picked in the top 10; Gallery may not make through the season. We’re soft on the line but expecting a lower 1st/2nd round to start and impact is unrealistic.
Food for thought – Trade our #8 and DMac for Big Ben and Pitts 2nd or next year’s 1st round. Pitt picks Clausen. We either put him in AA or give him Tiger’s discarded black book.

by raiders4liffe on Apr 14, 2010 12:57 AM PDT reply actions  

You know, I'm not for picking up a WR

but Tate’s probably the only one I would consider taking. He won’t be there in the 2nd though.

tatum, davidson, romanowski, wisniewski...LET'S GET NASTIER!!!!

by angelesoterica on Apr 14, 2010 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

only

if it’s a late pick to replace a Nick Miller who might not fully recovered; that new WR would absolutely need to be able to return kicks.

by raiders4liffe on Apr 14, 2010 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Tate's Going #8!!!!

Bet on THAT!!! ;)

It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Apr 14, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Owned?

Looked like a perfect throw from Clausen in between two defenders that really did it. The same Clausen that a lot of people in here don’t think has it.

by rightnasty on Apr 14, 2010 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tate would make any QB look better, I love the guy, gets open, a ball hawk, dangerous after reception, humble

great athlete all around. If we took him I’d be thrilled b/c we’d get to watch him live at home 8 or more times/yr.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 15, 2010 7:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Go see Remix….I mean JaKes Mock to see how it should go.

by rambis64 on Apr 14, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

How it should go

And how its gonna go are two different things. Look for Bryant or Tate at #8. Yup, we need linemen, but Al is still stuck in an era where one bluechip skill player can win games for you.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 14, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Affter watching a couple of Bo Jackson highlight films, I was thinking that DMC is making our line look bad and

JaMarcus was making our line look bad as well. Maybe the line is not so bad and we just needed more B&B – Bush & Bruce. … but then, there’s that Dallas game.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 14, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Could be mostly center, but I believe the entire interior is in need of upgrade

and though the tackles might not be that bad, better tackles do not rely on their fellow lineman to consistently perform, so it’s a red flag, nonetheless.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Apr 14, 2010 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad

I’m not the only one who notices a severe deficit in the middle of the O-line. The center and guard play is deplorable right now. Satele was beginning to pick it up, but I would be willing to shop Gallery.

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 14, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

on that note, DMac might finally break free off tackle

if the tackle were able to gain a head of steam about five yards down field, where he’s supposed to be, after the center and guard both collapse the defense from the middle first. You really only need about six inches or a foot from your center, but definitely can’t give up an inch to make it happen.

It’s supposed to be like a chain reaction occurring from the center, a few inches to a foot from the center, giving your guard 2-3 feet, your tackle 4-8 and so on, with a fb clearing a lane. Could be part of the reason we saw DMac colliding with tackles asses all the time. I’d love to see what a Pouncey and Iupati combo would do to remedy that. There are actually a few pretty nice guard center combos that would be a definitive upgrade over one side and the middle, as we speak. I hope those two positions are priority, with DT and MLB of course.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Apr 14, 2010 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's exciting to image just what our running game could be (not to mention improved pass protection)

with those two additions – or Olsen, Tennant, Waldon at Center. But get ready for Tate or Haden – and I honestly wouldn’t mind either of them either or OT Trent Williams. Our ears and eyes will be strained like starving leopards when the facist, Goodhell, announces #8.

by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 15, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

trade down

we can trade down an get san fran 1st 2 picks an get C pouncey and T campbell wit them 1st 2 picks and hopefully brian price fall 2 us in the 2nd round…and i dont mind drafting another corner to compete for the 2nd string spot Al vernur or perrish cox will b there late n the rounds 5-6th…i hope we keep kirk morrison for another yr…because its only 2 mlb i am set on an that is Mcclain an spikes….w.e. the raiders do i hope there improvements 2 the team in real life not jus madden

by Rell Rell Lynch on Apr 14, 2010 2:53 PM PDT reply actions  

I only like Pouncey if we trade down to get him.

Probably 17 with SF since they have a few picks they can spare to move up & probably get a QB. I also like Tate but we have far more serious needs than receiver. At this point I wouldn’t be too upset seeing Haden picked even though I’ve been begging for line help for the past 3 years.

by TAW on Apr 14, 2010 4:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Full Back

As a Kentucky Native an a Raiders Fan for 39 years..A great fit at Full Back would be Bonner from Kentucky …He would be a Steal for this team in the last round !!!!!!!!!!!!

by tw1st3d_111 on Apr 15, 2010 5:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Why not take another defensive player

and get Ritchie Brockel as an unsigned free agent?

Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death

by spec on Apr 15, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone else looking at WR besides Denver?

Tate’s a legit WR and a signal to DHB that he’s on thin ice. Who leaves the WR corps to make room for him though? Murphy’s a good WR, maybe Schilens goes? I’m seeing a trade going down with someone the more I think about it.

tatum, davidson, romanowski, wisniewski...LET'S GET NASTIER!!!!

by angelesoterica on Apr 15, 2010 10:28 PM PDT reply actions  

we're too impatient

Let me attempt to take a stab at defending him. please bear with me. DHB was a rookie with limited catches in college, we all knew that. He didn’t ask to be taken at #7; he just accidently caught AD’s eye on a track meet. We all knew his routes weren’t clean and saw numerous drops on film. Why would that change 4 months later? Now developing WR takes 2 -3 yrs (Jerry Rice had 3 TDs rookie yr with loads of drops) and eddie royal with the dunkies had a significant step backwards last season (37 versus 91 catches; 5 TDs versus 0). DHB will be a 3 yrs project, he didn’t deserve to start but AD wanted to groom him in deep water. Not his fault. JR didn’t put in the work with his WRs in the offseason. Not his fault. Multiple messages from different coaches. Not his fault. Cable calling plays. Not his fault. Now where are we? DHB needs to show big time progress in catching the ball with his hands and not body and to run the damn routes correctly, before training camp. During camp, his timing with whichever QB needs to get done. By the middle of the season, he’ll need to improve concealing his routes and not tipping off the play. We all know he has the God given speed. What he needs to show is a deep desire to to improve and I believe that he can get there with the assumption that catching skills can be acquired.

by raiders4liffe on Apr 16, 2010 3:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm only saying DHB needs to be challenged

and Tate will do that. Who drops off the WR depth chart is my question. We aren’t suddenly going to run 4wide sets on a regular basis. At most, 3wide sets, and that’s debateable. So we have DHB, Tate, Murphy, Schilens, Higgins, Holland and Watkins. Who among the first 4 is gone?

tatum, davidson, romanowski, wisniewski...LET'S GET NASTIER!!!!

by angelesoterica on Apr 17, 2010 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

A Look At The Obvious -or- Ridiculous

Scenario #1…

Al will for the 1st time trade down in the 2010 NFL draft out of the 1st n 2nd rds amassing a tremendous collection of 3rd to 7th rd pick to fill up his shopping list with the “LunchBox” types that Cable says he loves…

Scenario #2…

We will trade our 1st n 2nd rd selections for "QB"s so consequently only have our later rd picks remaining…

by PantyRaider on Apr 18, 2010 12:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50