Recapping the Oakland Raiders' 2010 NFL Draft

It's all over now. [via cdn2.sbnation.com]
The draft is an exciting time of the year for all football fans and it's no exception here. All the excitement and fun is over, however, as the picks are in and the trades have been made. From Thursday to Saturday, 32 NFL franchises have done just about everything their power to make their respective franchises better and Al Davis and company were among them. Here, I recap the 2010 NFL Draft for our Oakland Raiders.
Hit the jump for the pick-by-pick grades and then take a vote on the poll.

Rolando McClain is bringing his winning ways to Oakland. [via media.al.com]
Round 1, Pick 8: Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama -- Grade: A-
Inside linebacker or middle linebacker, call him whatever you want. It doesn't matter because the kid is a football player and was a pretty damn good one for the Alabama Crimson Tide. Now, McClain is coming to Oakland and taking over for Kirk Morrison. This was a surprise, but not a bad surprise. Just about everybody had written off McClain coming to Oakland, but Al Davis and company made a sensible decision with the eighth pick. After the aforementioned Morrison was dealt, this pick made a whole lot more sense. A true leader and someone of high character, McClain will be a big step in improving the anemic run defense. Can he alone put an end to our run defense woes? I don't know, but he can help in a big way. I know Rolando will make us proud.

Lamarr Houston recorded 12 sacks from 2007-2009 at Texas playing at end and tackle. [via justblogbaby.com]
Round 2, Pick 44: Lamarr Houston, DE, Texas -- Grade: D+
After trading down from the 39th pick and the 42nd pick, the Raiders pulled the trigger on a defensive lineman in Lamarr Houston from Texas. Playing both defensive end and defensive tackle at Texas, head coach Tom Cable said he'd be playing defensive end here. Picking a defensive end over a defensive tackle is puzzling to me. We needed a defensive tackle a whole lot more than a defensive end. I don't think Houston is a bad player or anything, but I felt that we reached a bit on a guy who doesn't fill that big of a need. If you wanted a defensive end, go out and grab Corey Wootton, Carlos Dunlap or Everson Griffen. At other positions, other guys include Jimmy Clausen and Linval Joseph. All of that considered, that's why the grade is so low.

Jared Veldheer is just the second player from Hillsdale to be drafted this high. [via cdn.cloudfiles.mosso.com]
Round 3, Pick 69: Jared Veldheer, OT, Hillsdale -- Grade: A-
Clearly needing to address the offensive line, offensive tackle seemed like a logical pick. Passing up on Bruce Campbell (which proved to be genius later on) who was considered the best tackle available at this spot by the respected Mike Mayock of NFL Network, Jared Veldheer was selected. A lot of Raiders fans were harping for him before the draft even began. Filled with potential, the fans may have to wait on this guy as he's considered a project by many; however, the value for him at the 69th pick was good and we didn't mess up with this pick. He will help the offensive line and that help is definitely warranted.

Bruce Campbell really impresses in his workouts. [via cdn1.sbnation.com]
Round 4, Pick 106: Bruce Campbell, OT, Maryland -- Grade: A-
By far the best offensive tackle available on the third day of the draft, you couldn't get better value out of this pick. Bruce Campbell was someone the Raiders clearly had their eye on and suspicion turned into confirmation with the selection of Maryland's combine wonder. Taking an offensive tackle, though, when you just took one in the previous round with other needs is the reason why this is an "A-" instead of something higher. Sometimes, you just can't win 'em all. Still, I have no complaints with this selection. Coming from a zone blocking system in Maryland, I think Tom Cable is most definitely pleased with this pick himself.

Jacoby Ford was the fastest player in the draft. [via cdn.cloudfiles.mosso.com]
Round 4, Pick 108: Jacoby Ford, WR, Clemson -- Grade: B-
Kirk Morrison was sent to the Jacksonville Jaguars along with a fifth-round pick and the Raiders moved all the way up to this spot. Listed as a wide receiver, the Raiders grabbed return specialist Jacoby Ford. Dubbed "the fastest football player on the East Coast," Ford now heads to Oakland with all of that 4.28 40 speed. I gave this a lower grade than some. I talked myself out of a "C+" and bumped it up since I'm hoping he can do some things on offense as well. Still, a return specialist could have been addressed in the sixth round while we still had needs at defensive tackle, cornerback and offensive guard at this point.

In the 2009 Outback Bowl, McFadden had two interceptions with one returned for a score. [via a.espncdn.com]
Round 5, Pick 138: Walter McFadden, CB, Auburn -- Grade: A
Once you put the Cal bias aside (for me, anyway), you come to the realization that Walter McFadden was actually a really nice pick even over Syd'Quan Thompson. (Sorry, Squid.) McFadden, who has returned three of his nine interceptions over the last two seasons for touchdowns, has great speed and that shouldn't surprise us with a cornerback pick. With that 4.4 40 speed, McFadden doesn't get beat deep and that's something we saw a few times too many with Chris Johnson. Most importantly, his high football IQ fits the system since he he played man-to-man at Auburn so much. It wouldn't surprise me if he competed for a starting job in camp and the preseason.

Travis Goethel never gives up on a play. [via nfldotcom.files.wordpress.com]
Round 6, Pick 190: Travis Goethel, ILB, Arizona State -- Grade: D+
Perceived as a special teams pick, this selection was a very questionable one considering that a fullback, running back, defensive tackle, offensive guard and center were bigger needs. Goethel, a four-year senior and an honorable mention for his Pac-10 defense, managed to accumulate just under an average of 65 tackles per season for the Sun Devils in his last three years. He does supply us with a little depth at the position. That doesn't explain the pick to me even tough he works hard and is a great competitor. Again, we had bigger needs and should have addressed them with this pick.

Jeremy Ware can deliver the hit despite weighing at just 184 pounds. [via www.statenews.com]
Round 7, Pick 215: Jeremy Ware, CB, Michigan State -- Grade: C
While a lot of people were hoping for Syd'Quan Thompson of Cal, we instead went with another cornerback with dreads that wears a single digit. Jeremy Ware started just one season at Michigan State while being a four-year senior. His strength is tackling and can hit you hard. He impressed at pro day with his vertical and broad jumps, so the athleticism is there. At this pick, I don't think anyone can disagree with taking a cornerback while it appears that the defensive tackle ship has sailed.

Stevie Brown will likely transition back into a defensive back with the Raiders. [via cdn1.sbnation.com]
Round 7, Pick 251: Stevie Brown, S, Michigan -- Grade: D
Instead of taking an offensive guard, center, defensive tackle, running back, fullback or even a project quarterback, the Raiders went with a safety. Playing out of his position in his senior year, he still led the team in tackles at outside linebacker. Still, this pick is puzzling as other needs existed instead of someone to play the same position as Mike Mitchell, Hiram Eugene, Michael Huff, Jerome Boyd and Tyvon Branch. It's hard to see him make the team as a safety, though.

Jason Campbell is looking forward to a new beginning and so are we. [via www.sportsbusinessdaily.com]
Trades: Jason Campbell in, Kirk Morrison out -- Grade: A
In a move that significantly improved the three-day draft, the Washington Redskins shipped Jason Campbell here for a 2012 fourth-round pick. This was absolutely a fantastic move. Campbell is, without a doubt, the best quarterback on the roster with all due respect to Bruce Gradkowski. I expect Campbell to be starting under center in Tennessee on September 12, 2010. Another reason this is a great trade is because Al Davis seems to finally realize that JaMarcus Russell isn't an NFL quarterback. Earlier in the day, while I was asleep, Kirk Morrison was traded to the Jaguars along with the 153rd pick in exchange for the 108th pick. A Morrison trade became pretty likely after the drafting of Rolando McClain on Thursday. Getting the 108th pick wasn't bad value for Morrison and I am fine what we received in return. I wish him all the best in Jacksonville. More importantly, though, acquiring Jason Campbell was the most important thing the Raiders did in the last three days.
153 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Houston D+?
I concur.
"It's like Will Smith, remember the Fresh Prince? Get the ball don't let nobody else shoot? That's kinda what the offense can be sometimes, and they're just standing around waiting for Monta to make a play"
-MT2
by golden_solitude on Apr 24, 2010 2:11 PM PDT reply actions
whoops I used concur incorrectly
I meant I strongly disagree.
"It's like Will Smith, remember the Fresh Prince? Get the ball don't let nobody else shoot? That's kinda what the offense can be sometimes, and they're just standing around waiting for Monta to make a play"
-MT2
by golden_solitude on Apr 24, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I know a lot of people won’t like that grade, but I just don’t see the point in taking a defensive end with the 44th pick with other needs.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
Who knows how long seymour will ACTUALLY be here.
plus the fact that he’ll look awesome on the other side of Dick.
We're paying Seymour so much money,
and our coaching staff and Davis love him so much, it was just a matter of time before they were gonna bring in a guy with similar speed, size and versatility.
Facing a 305lb DE can be a bitch. And it sucks even worse when the guy is lining up all over the place.
All I know is,
Desmond BETTER be 2 things: 1) HUGE. 2) DOMINANT. 3) TOUGH – we CANNOT HAVE INJURIES.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I see Houstan as a Seymour type that will play both.
What’s best for houstan is that he get to learn from the best in Seymour. Plus, who knows how long we’ll have Seymour around. I give it a B-/C+. I like the guy and I think he’ll be good, but a Big run stuffing NT would have been better.
Cable Bumaye! Raiders Bumaye!
Other defensive ends available were Corey Wootton, Everson Griffen and Carlos Dunlap as well. The pick was questionable in more ways than one.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions
It doesn’t matter that he played defensive tackle at college, really, since he can’t play defensive tackle on run downs. Cable said he was playing defensive end anyway.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions
so even if we got those other guys, they would be playing DT as well.
Cable said he was specifically targeting this guy in the second. And DE opposite of Seymour is still a question mark anyways.
I think Houston will start with us, and be a great player. He has great upside, and he’s versatile. Being versatile in DT for a DE, means he’ll be getting double teams on the edge. Seymour is a question mark after this year, and our DTs can survive. Even our run defense can survive with McClain at MLB, as he is great in run defense. According to Cable, our defensive scheme will be different this year, and he I have a feeling he has something in store for Houston and our defense overall.
Seymour should be less bound (and hopefully more motivated) with the added defensive acquisitions
especially Houston. So I expect more pre-Oakland type play from Rich.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions
so even if we got those other guys, they would be playing DT as well.
Um, no. Houston isn’t playing defensive tackle and none of those ends we could have had would have been either.
And DE opposite of Seymour is still a question mark anyways.
Then why not take, I don’t know, a better defensive end?
Even our run defense can survive with McClain at MLB, as he is great in run defense.
I hope he can make that big of a difference by himself as a rookie.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Meant DE with the 1st thing
Houston is a great DE pickup. He has the size and strength to be great in that position.
I should clarify… McClain will HELP with our run defense woes. As was some other additions that the names I can’t remember.
It was an okay defensive end pick considering how, in my opinion, better defensive end options were available in Griffen and Dunlap. Also, again, it wasn’t that big of a need and we spent our 44th pick on him.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I like Houston A LOT more than Griffen and Dunlap
Dunlap is very inconsistent, and Griffen I think has issues(explains the slipping in the draft, and by even picking him instead of houston would result in bad value).
You had Houston ahead of both of them on your big board? You’d be just about the only one.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
maybe
but Cable agrees with me.
also, I think griffen fits more of a speed rushing guy. not much of a run stopper.
houston can play both the pass and the run equally average-above average.
Griffen slipped ALL THE WAY to the 4th round
do you think his value would be great at #2???
Also Dunlao IS consistent, and may “experts” agree that Houston was the better pickup for the raiders(they were talking about it).
so I’m not the only one.
The experts see “DT” next to Houston and that’s why. That’s also why I initially liked the picked more than I like it now. Dunlap is just as good against the run as Houston. He sheds blockers. He’s solid against the run.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions
They were talking about DE, not DT
Dunlap is Inconsistent. Many people have said this. If Houston is as good against the run, than why the doubt? He is solid too. Cable even says that Houston was a very important pick for them.
Sorry, I am not drinking the Kool-Aid. They draft a so-called “run stopper” at defensive end and I’m supposed to be giddy?
[…] than why the doubt?
How many more times can I say? We. Didn’t. Need. A. Defensive. End. With. The. Number. Forty-four. Pick.
This is nothing about doubt.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Seymour is questionable after this year
We don’t know who will start at the other end of seymour(or just one of the Ends)
I say this is a need considering that Seymour might not be back next year, and with that Idea, we don’t have a 1st rounder next year either. This guy IS starting on our team this year, and Cable, and according to a few “experts” and a reporter that he helped solve our run defense needs.
Come to think of it, Run defense was the ONLY thing we needed to address. I remember someone here showed me a stat, that we are top 5 in Sacks from our DL alone. We have an above average pass defense. All we need is to fix the run defense, and by getting BOTH McClain AND Houston, and this is not just me saying this, we have addressed our need of run defense.
Our DTs can survive, they are pretty average, maybe a bit above that.
Also, getting a DE in Houston who looks SOLID, would help our DTs overall because it is A LOT harder for a RB to go through the middle, and if the RB can’t REALLY get past the end where Houston is, then Middle is the best to go.
We got Houston so he can start, it’s up to him if he wants to be a great player or a slouch.
It was a small need because Matt Shaughnessy stepped up and played well, Trevor Scott played and Richard Seymour is still around for at least one year. It’s not something that needed to be addressed with the 44th pick at all.
All we need is to fix the run defense, and by getting BOTH McClain AND Houston, and this is not just me saying this, we have addressed our need of run defense.
No, Houston isn’t a nose tackle. He doesn’t really help the run defense.
Our DTs can survive, they are pretty average, maybe a bit above that.
That’s laughable considering how routinely terrible our run defense has been.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions
They ARE average.
It’s amazing that PIN THE RUN DEFENSE woes ONLY on our DTs.
Morrison couldn’t tackle the guy when they do get through the middle, at least before 5 yards.
And it’s amazing to think that fixing the run defense rests SOLELY on the DTs. You know that this is a team effort right? What I;m saying is, is that you can fix run defense with McClain and Houston.
McClain has great run defense awareness, and if the guy thinks he has a hole in the middle, McClain plugs it up. That’s his job.
Houston seals the edge up, and if I remember, teams ran all over us on the edge too last year. And houston makes the DTs better, because of what I stated above. he forces the RB Inside, where it is more difficult to run, then the outside. This is true because the main focus of a RB, is to immediately bounce to the outside when past the line, which I think it’s a lot harder to do in the middle. And remember what part of McClains job is? Looking at him, he looks like he has above average run awareness, so if the guy is running, McClainm, as a MLB, has to follow that guy, and if he has to go in the middle, McClain should be there as well.
It’s amazing that PIN THE RUN DEFENSE woes ONLY on our DTs.
I’m not. It’s just amazing that defensive tackle is the only position we never address early in a draft.
I agree with everything you’re saying about McClain.
What I;m saying is, is that you can fix run defense with McClain and Houston.
Again, I disagree. Houston isn’t playing defensive tackle. It’s not like we don’t have defensive ends on the roster that can force the running back to the inside.
Houston seals the edge up, and if I remember, teams ran all over us on the edge too last year.
Not as much as they killed us up the middle for nine-yard gains.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
they killed us up the middle for 9 yard gains because....
of the average awareness of Kirk Morrison. I hate talking bad to him, but he can’t cover the middle from the run. Which is why I like McClain at the position better than Morrison. He can play the run A LOT better. and prevent those 9 yard gains, and turn them into at least 4 yard gains.
I think Wootton, Dunlap and Griffen are better defensive end prospects than Houston, but that’s just me.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
It wasn’t entirely Morrison’s fault. We’ve never had good defensive tackles as they have been average at best.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions
McClain should make it better for them, and us.
Maybe sticking seymour in there with Kelly is best, idk.
I can see you saying "no, it's because we have bad DTs"
but really? You really think McClain CAN’T solve our problems with RBs running up the MIDDLE?
McClain alone isn’t going to solve the problems.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
But he helps a lot better than morrison
I am saying this because he DOES have better run awareness.
And he CAN help solve our problems. Not alone, it’s a team game, but it’s been done PLENTY of times with first round MLBs.
But he helps a lot better than morrison
I am saying this because he DOES have better run awareness.
Well, I never disagreed with you on that.
[…] it’s been done PLENTY of times with first round MLBs.
I’m sure they had better than average defensive tackles if it has been done.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Okay... it seems the run game depends on the DTs to you.
you didn’t say that, but it appears so. We’ll see on what happens this year.
I like the pick, you don’t. Only camp and pre-season, and regular season can tell.
The run game depends on both defensive tackles and the middle linebacker. It’s a big reason why I gave McClain the “A-” grade I did.
I hope Houston impacts the run game as much as you say he will.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions
There's never anything that I am certain in.
I think he will. But it’s I think, we are talking about here.
PG2, I'm with you on this one
Houston is a hybrid who will play mostly at DE, and his run-stopping ability and flexibility will be an asset in allowing us to give teams different looks. I too would have liked to see a true DT in our draft picks, but there’s NO WAY you can call the pick a D+.
@worldblee on Twitter.
Thank you, I prefer Houston to
Gerald McCoy. Compare the two and mainly the hunger on film. We brought in an aggressive reliable run stopper who can also pressure the QB – what more do you want aside from 40 lbs of fat? Because that’s what most of these so called run stuffers added – useless lard that makes them weigh more.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Ive got a feeling their gonna plug Desmond Bryant
in at DT he’s earn a shot
When I want Mel Kipers opinion, I'll fucking give it to him !
Me
It would have been to have Linval Joseph in a rotation with Tommy Kelly and Desmond Bryant.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, I know I wanted Linval too
But it didn’t happen
I was prepared to down a whole beer in one swallow if we drafted Linval. Then to see him go right after us too killed me.
Hopefully The Raiders have a master plan I can’t see yet.
When I want Mel Kipers opinion, I'll fucking give it to him !
Me
I was taken back by the move
because I wanted and expected Linval Joseph. But Lamarr is more polished and has a longer lasting battery than Joseph.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions
houston can play both the pass and the run equally average-above average.
Wait, are you saying he’s above average?
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I looked at him yesterday, and I can say that he
looks like he CAN be above average. He has a good chance to be above average. Right now, I think of him as a good pick, and only time will tell if he was a “great” pick or not.
but he looks solid to me.
When you’re drafted 44th, you be better be above average. I have no doubt he’ll be an above average player.
You think of him as a good pick, but I think of him as a below average pick considering things that I’ve stated before.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I strongly disagree, Houston is a hugh improvement over Tommy Kelly and is a lean 300+
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
He’s not playing defensive tackle, though.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Undrafted Free Agent Thread Open:
It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Apr 24, 2010 2:15 PM PDT reply actions
Oops here
It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09
by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Apr 24, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Geothal, assuming we may go 3-4
may be great next to McClain. I read his bio, and it says that he is superb against the run, and above average in the pass.
although it’s likely Howard will be next to McClain if we go 3-4…
Ricky?
He was COMPETING for the position WITH Kirk. That says something.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Which is why
Ricky was in contention.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions
so... Ricky is VERY good in run coverage? and very good in pass coverage?
I don’t know much about him, besides him contending with Kirk!
Dammit..
Let me go look for tape and analysis.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
31 Tackles and 1 FF
Before Injury in week 5.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
that's good.
he seems like he has good character, and the mentality that he wants to be a fierce MLB.
we’ll see what happens in camp though.
Base 4-3
With some hybrid looks (as Rambis points out below)…hopefully a few more than last year. If you expect much more than that, you’re going to be disappointed.
You’ve got a good positive attitude though!
We never got a NT so there will be no 3-4, just some hydrid looks
When I want Mel Kipers opinion, I'll fucking give it to him !
Me
also special teams is VERY underrated.
Think of the benefits it actually has, and you realize special teams is needed.
And we SUCKED on Coverage on Special Teams.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, one thing I'm stoked on
is that it looks like we got a big upgrade on ST. We should be able to tackle guys sooner and more securely, leading to better field position—which our offense will need.
@worldblee on Twitter.
Tom Waddle on NFL Network singing the praises of the Raider draft right now
He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is
2 helpings of Campbell soup
Bruce and Jason
Kudos to Al
He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Good luck to them getting him to do more than fall over.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Apr 24, 2010 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Cable is doing a press conference LIVE
Talking about the Draft. RIGHT NOW.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 3:07 PM PDT reply actions
It Just ended.
However, on http://www.raiders.com/news/draft-2010-live.html , there is Draft day Recap conferences and intrerviews. Today’s, I’m sure will go up either later tonight or tomorrow.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Apr 24, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions
This draft is like Gradkowski
Better than before, not as great as I was hoping for
tatum, davidson, romanowski, wisniewski...LET'S GET NASTIER!!!!
all in all good draft
hopefully the change of scenery will help Jason Campbell
TULO = 2010 MVP!
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
LETS GO WINGS!
He is coming off of a career year. His numbers weren’t bad at all. He’s been starting for three years. The offensive situation in Washington last year was really bad. They had all that whatever you want to call it going on with Jim Zorn. They had a lot of injuries as well.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Come On
Houston deserves a B grade at least. He was a great pick and we traded down for him.
If Winning Isn't Everthing, Why Do They Keep Score? - Vince Lombardi
My reasoning has been explained above.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions
He can’t play defensive tackle on run downs and Tom Cable said he’s playing defensive end.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I think I can understand your dismay
The Raiders had an above average draft. The Houston pick baffles me a bit, not because of who he is, but what he represents. I’m like a lot of people hoping for a switch to a 3-4, but without the fire hydrant NT, it probably ain’t happening, I was disappointed they didin’t pick Cody or Joseph.
I’m not sure they will have enough D-Lineman to make up a decent 4-3.
He can play both and probably will
this Mike Waufle D Line is going to be in flux all the time with guys coming in and out and moving all over the place. It’ll create confusion
I know we all wanted a NT, I sure as hell did, but the Raiders seem to have a plan.
A plan is something we’ve rarely had. So I’m inclined to trust them. This is the best draft most of us can remember so enjoy it.
When I want Mel Kipers opinion, I'll fucking give it to him !
Me
also
Cable stated that he wanted this guy in the second round. this was the guy he was targeting. he has a plan for houston in his scheme he is making for us.
He says he’s making a scheme, idk.
If I understand the grading, it's not so much a reflection on Houston so much as what we "should have taken" when we took him
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Right, I am not saying he’s a bad player at all. The guy was clearly productive at Texas. I just think we took him a bit too high. I think there were better defensive ends available such as Corey Wootton, Everson Griffen and especially Carlos Dunlap. I don’t think defensive end was that big of a need. It also has to do with what was available and need combined. For example, Linval Joseph was available and we really could have used a defensive tackle. Jimmy Clausen was available and he has the ability to become a franchise quarterback.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 24, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
You know what's on the front page of Sports Illustrated.com?
Rebirth of a Nation
Wow. This feels good.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
I kind of like it better when they hate us
Revenge is a good motivation for a team ;-).
@worldblee on Twitter.
Hey everyone, my first post here. I am actually an Eagles fan but over the last two seasons or so I have come to root for the Raiders a bit. No idea why because your owner is insane and your coach is a pretty big jerkoff but there is just something awesome about the allure of Raiders Nation. The Silver and Black. I love a good defense and the Raiders have a very solid one. I think like most of you that your team had an excellent draft and although I am not a big fan of Campbell as he has been nothing but a disappointment in Washington, he is a marked upgrade over Russell and Gradkowski. Good luck this season. I am hoping you can make a solid push for the playoffs.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Thank you Eagles fan, we are grateful to you for running McNabb out of town and making Campbell available
Btw, who do you believe did better in the draft than Oakland?
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Eagle fans did not run McNabb out of town, you can blame the front office and their coach for that. I am not a big McNabb fan, but I would gladly take him over Andy Reid any day. The fan’s definitely voiced their opinions but after 11 years of never being able to win a Super Bowl and having a guy who is supposedly ready to take over, the team had to do something. Moving McNabb made the most sense, he was able to give them the best value in return.
Not sure if any team had a better draft but I would say Seattle, (when you factor in their two trades) and San Fran did pretty well. Seattle might be the only team that I would say could maybe match up with Oakland as having the best draft, but having two picks in the top 15 certainly makes it a lot easier.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Are you saying the Patriots had a better draft?
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
well it's my opinion yeah(I'm a raider fan too. go figure)
the raiders had a good draft but…
the draft got 2 great TEs(need)
An ALL purpose CB in McCourty, and I mean ALL purpose(besides offense)
Spikes, a steal.
A very good WR named Taylor Price(look him up when you can)
and we got a 2nd rounder next year, which makes us have two 1st rounders, and two 2nd rounders next year.
See below. I do understand needing two TE’s, I think Hernandez is a better TE when compared to Gronkowki, but that’s me. Like I said, I love McCourty, he is legit, I wanted the Eagles to draft him so badly but that did not happen. I do like Price a lot and he was very very underrated.
Truthfully I did not factor next year’s picks into it, but the Patriots having two picks in each of the first two rounds is pretty incredible. The Eagles and Patriots are the best at draft deal wheeling and dealing. No doubt about it.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
let me explain your thing wit da two TEs
The pats used to have two TEs as well, that was Graham(blocking) and Watson(receiving).
We only have an old TE with us right now, who will likely not be with us next year.
Gronk is a great blocking TE, and Hernandez is a great All-Around receiving TE.
Hernandez is projected to be a faster Dustin Keller(and quicker, and more versatile too. he can play HB, FB, and WR as well), and Gronk as Witten.
Oakland has two TEs, in Miller, and what’s his name? it escaped me!
So yeah.
I understand the concept of having two TE’s, and the purposes for each I just didn’t think it was worth taking Gronkowski at that spot but clearly the Patriots know more than I do.
I do like Hernandez a lot and think he will be a very good TE.
And I would assume you are talking about Tony Stewart?
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Nope. Brandon Myers. just remembered!
but yeah, the raiders had a great draft. I am very excited for them this year.
By the way, given the personnel we have, how does a 4-2-5 look to you?
My lineup:
Houston, Kelly, Seymour, Matt S. or Scott
McClain and Howard(they should be near the middle)
Asomugha, Branch, Huff/Mitchell, McFadden, Huff/Mitchell
I can’t wait till what Cable has in store for us! Mini Camp is close by.
Does Myers play? I thought he was a Special Teams guy?
It’s funny you mentioned the 4-2-5, I was at the Penn State Blue and White game earlier today and we were watching some of the draft before the game started and someone mentioned the Raiders defense and what type of scheme they ran. I told them what it was and then went into detail about how I would like to see them consider a 4-2-5 based on their personnel.
The guy looked at me like I was nuts and I went into detail about the versatility it allows for and how it worked wonders for TCU this past season.
To be honest with you, I wonder how much pressure they would get on the QB with this set up but it would certainly be worth a shot. They are obviously going to have to use a lot of secondary blitzes if they want to get at the QB.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Cable said he would enveil(spelled wrong) a style of defense we should all like.
I’m totally up for a 4-2-5 now.
by the way
the eagles picked very nicely this draft. got both graham AND sapp. a nice safety. I say you guys had a pretty good draft as well.
I agree, the Eagles did well. I think Nate Allen is going to be a very good safety which they needed badly. Neither of the guys…actually there was about 4 of them that rotated in to play Safety and none of them did all that well. They don’t have a Free and Strong Safety in the strictest terms they just have two safeties who go out and on different plays have different assignments.
Graham I think will do well, I don’t really like their third pick which is the DE from Washington. But hopefully Reid knows something I don’t.(Which I would imagine he does)
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
They drafted Quintin Demps in 08 but he really is not a good safety. Constantly called for back breaking penalties.
Last year they drafted Macho Harris a CB from V-Tech whom they switched positions(Eagles love to do that) to Safety and he stunk as well. But I will give him the benefit of the doubt and credit it to it being a new position.
I think their starting safeties this year will be Quintin Mikell and Nate Allen.
I can not stand Andy Reid, and Asante Samuel is a fantastic corner, I just wish he knew how to tackle. He honestly has to be the worst tackler I have ever seen. I understand why he likes to gamble so much and try and get the pick because he is not bringing anyone down after they catch the ball.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
lol, that's ashante!
I think he is a diva somehow, lol. I never liked his gambles, he makes a good play one time, and screws up the next 3-5 plays.
ah well.
Oh don’t get me wrong, I can’t stand Asante. He drives me friggin insane. But all said and done he is a great corner. But yeah, his gambles get a little maddening. Especially like you said, he will make one good play and then get embarrassed the next 3 series.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Hobbs was decent last year as a 3rd – 4th corner, he also did a lot as a returner. He was hurt at the end of the year, a think a neck stinger or something like that. But yeah, he was pretty good. I think he might compete for the 2nd starting corner job now that Sheldon Brown is gone.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Good point about the key being pressure on the QB
Please consider leaving your former life behind and joining the Raider Nation. We welcome thinking lovers of the game such as yourself.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Apr 24, 2010 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Well thank you very much. I will certainly take as many opportunities as I can to watch the silver and black this year, sadly it probably won’t be that many times as I don’t think they have many national games?
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
We don’t have any games on Thursday, Saturday, Sunday night or Monday night.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Apr 25, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I do like the Patriots draft, love McCourty, Cunningham, Spikes and Price but I do not understand the Gronkowski pick at all. Seemed like a total reach to me. The Patriots seem to be successful every year in their draft so I am sure this year is no different.
Can't think of something catchy to say here...I suck.
Gronk is projected as the next Jason Witten. nough' said really.
he is a good-great blocker, and is a good receiver. only problem was back injuries. and if you think about it, the ravens picked a TE right afterwards. so TE was being picked off early. They picked him at a good spot imo.
SI (Don Banks) lavishing compliments - this feels pleasantly odd
This is a little like using a muscle I didn’t know I had — it’s painful at first — but the Oakland Raiders really looked like they knew what they were doing in this draft. …
Lauding the Raiders for their draft acumen. This is going to take some getting used to. Maybe Al Davis has a future in this business.
You guys got four starters - GREAT Draft!
Chiefs and Donkeys would BOTH have loved McClain. It seems weird, that Oakland had the best draft of the AFC West. I think KC got the best player in Berry (and a ton of speed after that), San Diego filled their need of RB & NT, Denver, it looks like Al Davis of the past was making their picks. It was kind of funny.
Anyway, as a Chiefs fan, it’s hard to say, but good job, especially on the first four picks!
A+
The best past of our draft wasn’t what we picked up drafting. IT is what we seem to be getting rid of with a trade. Bubye JaBloatAssNeverWinsThrowsLotsOfInterceptions JaMadesMeCryEveryGameFor3Years I can’t wait to see the look on his Michelin Man face and body when in 5 years he is lined up for social assistance or on TLC for a documentary on “Morbidly Obese Former Professional Athletes”
Fat fuck good ridance I shall have a few grins on my face this year thinking about him getting fatter by the second has he waddles out onto his porch and talks about “his career”.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Apr 24, 2010 8:00 PM PDT reply actions
Saint saw him yesterday and said JR looked awesome
which means little at this point though – Saint also mentioned something about his confidence being less than an inch tall… I think JR finally woke up, mostly b/c it dawned on him that his mama will get angry at him for fail at delivering goods. Can you imagine the fit?
Jim Otto yesterday sounded extremely skeptical about JR’s football intelligence.
by Spirals galore on Apr 24, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
HA!
Intelligence and JaRaiderNoLonger don’t fit in the same sentence anyhow………greedy fat bitch that he is.
Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Apr 25, 2010 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions
As much as it pains me to say this.
Great draft Raider Nation. Also have to respect the Jason Campbell trade, got a very underrated QB for only a 4th rounder in the 2012 NFL Draft (2 Years From Now!!!).
Think you guys could do a fellow AFCW fan a favor, and keep Jamarcus Russell as your starting QB though? :)
Straw-Berry Pie, Blue-Berry Pie, Poison-Berry Pie, Cherry-Berry Pie, Super-Berry Pie. I love them all!
Awe, I thought you guys wanted him. lol
c’mon, he has OODLES of potennnntiallllll! How can you resist?
Lol
Well Jamarcus Russell is my favorite Raider, but black and silver just seems to fit him a whole lot better. Think he would look ugly in gold and red. Otherwise I might.
Straw-Berry Pie, Blue-Berry Pie, Poison-Berry Pie, Cherry-Berry Pie, Super-Berry Pie. I love them all!
by ChiefsFan90s on Apr 24, 2010 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions
He can't be any worse than Leaf...wait
Oh, trade him to the chokesondickers! They love the deuce, first as their pick (Leaf), now they can have it written on the jersey!
tatum, davidson, romanowski, wisniewski...LET'S GET NASTIER!!!!
by angelesoterica on Apr 25, 2010 4:19 AM PDT up reply actions

by 































