Silver And Black Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation interviews Jerome Bettis

What the Raiders are Unwilling to Admit

The Raiders are still weak in the interior Defensive Line.  When we traded Gerrard Warren to NE, we filled his gap with Kellen Heard a 6-6, 355 lbs DT out of Memphis - un-drafted but signed as a RFA. Heard's claim to fame is a cheap shot on Colt McCoy. Oakland also re-signed former Raider DT, Chris Cooper a 6-5 emaciated 285 lbs brought in from the UFL wilderness. William Joseph (6-5 310) is still on the roster along with Tommy Kelly (whose greatest highlights show his nether regions). We are optimistic about Desmond Bryant who now has a year of experience and by accounts is buffing up - now at 310 lbs.

Then there's Richard Seymour, who played DE and DT last season, but is listed as DE on the current roster. However, our roster lists 6 DEs (including Lamarr Houston our 2nd draft pick), so it's likely Seymour will see more action in the interior middle. So with Kelly, Bryant, Joseph, Cooper, Heard and (probably) Seymour playing DT, you decide whether they are strong enough to take us as far as the other elements (DBs, LBs, DEs) of our Defense.

Here's a breakdown of Rich Seymour's 2009 season. Rich shows the old potential - but no consistency.

Playerbar_php_medium

Tommy Kelly, had 5 decent games, most coming early on weeks 4 vs. Houston, 6 vs. Philadelphia, 8 vs. S.D., but throughout the season he was sporadic. If there's an upgrade need on this team it remains run D middle.

Playerbar_php_medium

via profootballfocus.com

Bottom line: Our Defensive is still vulnerable between the DEs. I had hoped we'd put Lamarr Houston smack in the middle but that doesn't seem to be the plan. Thus, even the positive acquisitions of Mike Waufle as DL Coach and MLB Rolando McClain may not be sufficient to quash top 12 rushing offenses like: Tennessee, Miami, Jacksonville or Kansas City (x2), all of which we face in regular season. I expect 5 games where our middle is pummeled if things remain at status quo. 

What, if anything, needs to be done?

I believe the addition of a proven veteran DT of the caliber of Albert Haynesworth 320, whose 2009 season game report is below, is what's needed to avoid a looming disaster.

Playerbar_php_medium

via profootballfocus.com

Any of the following DTs would cure our IL-ness and we should get one them (by hook or crook): Jonathan Babineaux (Atlanta), Kelly Gregg or Haloti Ngata (Baltimore), Kevin or Pat Williams (Minnesota), Sione Pouha or Mike Devito (NYJ), Brodrick Bunkley (Philadelphia), Lorenzo Alexander (Washington), Shaun Rogers or Ahtyba Rubin (Cleveland), Kyle Williams (Buffalo), Israel Idonije (Chicago), Jay Ratliff (Dallas), Aubrayo Franklin (SF), Brandon Mebane (Seattle). The first 3 listed have even better charts than Haynesworth whose chart was better than Wilfork's.

NB. FA John Henderson is not of the caliber of these 17 aforementioned DTs. 

News Flash 1:45 pm Thursday 5/6/10 ... JaMarcus Russell has been released!!!!!!!

Poll
Is our interior DL weak?
Yes, we need to bring in one more professional
1100 votes
No, the players we now have are good enough
344 votes

1444 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 169 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great Work SOB:

I have always liked Aytyba Rubin. he has a nasty streak and I really liked him coming out of College.

It is all about coming together as a team. At the end of the day, the team is all we have. - T. Branch 10-14-09

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on May 4, 2010 1:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

Attacking others only attacks yourself

by dubzfan on May 4, 2010 2:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Really?

He’s not better than Jay Ratliff?Bunkely? (keep in mind Philly wants Henderson).

Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

Attacking others only attacks yourself

by dubzfan on May 4, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

All of the guys mentioned are under contract with their respective teams.

Also there’s no chance Franklin or Ratliff are being traded this year. If Franklin was going to it would be done during the draft. Is there anyone on this list that we have a realistic chance of signing assuming Oakland recognizes this is still an area of weakness?

by TAW on May 4, 2010 2:21 PM PDT reply actions  

But, by your reasoning, we would've released JaMarcus after year 1 because he didn't

live up to his 1st Rd. pick. I’d give Richard another full and healthy year before deciding whether or not he’s trade bait.

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you, I would have release Russell earlier. The fact is we're far better off at the DEs and LBs than we

are at DTs. We need to do something – unless unHeard or Bryant are going to become something special this year.
Moreover, we’re banking on two rookies – Veldheer and Campbell – to suddenly develop and take our OL out of the toilet. We need to bring in an OT and a DT before we go to camp. Campbell is not going to play OT and even if Veldheer meets Cable’s dreams we still have the likes of Henderson and Barnes (Pears I won’t even mention).

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 4, 2010 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Veldeer plays superb right off the bat, then I think our O-Line is solid.

Henderson is nothing to worry about, as long as Galery is healthy, he’ll play fine. So I think our O-line is really ok for another 2-3 years. Unless Satele trashcans it this year, then we should look at a Center next year.

Our D-line is going to be very interesting. So many options at DE and UT, but not true NT to make it complete.

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Shoulda never signed him when he held out. It wasnt like he came in to change our team for the better anyhow. After the holdout he was so far behind being NFL ready and full of himself for making Al capitulate on the contract. I woulda left him for sure half way through last year.

Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!

by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on May 5, 2010 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

we would have to get some player for seymour thats worth a 1st round or 2nd round pick!

i would send j russell in a flash if i could with seymour but i would want a very good dt !

by sports with steve on May 4, 2010 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a scenario where Al's last spending spree is having a negative effect on not signing solid veterans.

Remember Girbil Wilson, Al’s propably not gonna budge in Free Agency…. OR Trades remember DeAngela Hall, Al remebers, its all draft from here on out.

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 4, 2010 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

To be honest I think that's a better way to go than going after a bunch of free agents.

The better teams are built through the draft. Unless we are assured of getting someone who would be a sure-fire impact guy now then I’m for it but otherwise a guy like Henderson is just hoping he helps.

by TAW on May 4, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

i agree but we cant be giving up draft picks because we need them for next year.

if we trade seymour for haynesworth then maybe thats a good trade and we get another dt. also henderson is a free agent with no strings attached. why not give henderson a tryout

by sports with steve on May 4, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Unless the plan is to have a steady rotation

the current group is definitely lacking run stuffing ability. No matter how much we shout about this glaring need it seems to be overlooked every single year. The addition of Houston and Seymour (from last year) will help going into this year as these guys are good solid players, but we just don’t have a running down space eater.

From the team’s perspective though (and maybe you pointed at it a bit SOB), there aren’t a lot of guys available to pick up, especially with the RFA’s this year. Kind of a lean market.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on May 4, 2010 2:43 PM PDT reply actions  

+1 on rotating our line a lot

We tend to wear down late in games (this was compounded by our lousy offense last year). If we keep guys fresh along with controlling the time of possession better, we might be able to get through this season OK.

@WorldBLee

by worldblee on May 4, 2010 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

We have a space eater in Kellen Heard if thats what you want, but the question is, will he move the Center?

Ratliff was a 7th round guy, almost undrafted, Rubin 6th round. Kelly Gregg 6th round. Lorenzo Alexander, undrafted. Kellen Heard was an undrafted guy, perhaps a gem, lets wait and see…
lets not panic. Sometimes NT’s are drafted so low because of their size and are automatically pegged as “guy with work ethic issues”…

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 4, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are probably right

NT’s did seem to slide some during the draft, but it also seems like the team has it down on the list to wait until the later rounds or UDFA. If they find a gem, great, but is a bit of a reach.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on May 4, 2010 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

IMHO McClain and Wimbley are strong enough to shed blocks and make tackles. Hopefully, Houston will stop runners before they get to Scott.

by Raider25 on May 4, 2010 2:47 PM PDT reply actions  

i don't like the report cards. they judge stats alone.

While all who don’t know that I don’t believe in stats, here’s why:

1) They only determine numbers(no kidding right?) that have no meaning to “why” the player had the numbers. if that doesn’t make sense, then read my other reasons.

2) It doesn’t put into consideration of the team they are on, or the players surrounding him.

3) What if they pick up double teams, and the other players around them get slightly better?

4) Overall they can be misleading.

But this is just me.

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

by patriotguy2 on May 4, 2010 2:57 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

LOL!!! I believe the McClain selection is a bit of a reach since the Raiders already have Kirk Morrison who led the team in tackles the past 3 years.

Also I think my days as a draft guru are numbered after Todd McShay and the larger prime time audience watching exposed my incompetence.

by TAW on May 4, 2010 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I watched the wwl coverage of the pick again this past weekend

what a jackass that alleged expert is as he bitched about McClain, and how his boy Clausen fell. Not only did every team pass on Clausen, but half the teams (including KC w/ Charlie Weis) passed twice on him.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on May 4, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was mocking Mel Kiper.

You of all people know I was high on McClain. He was rated 6th on my board of players I would have liked us to draft. The Raiders had him 1 better at 5th. I especially love how the pick effected Denver’s free fall since they wanted him. I really hope he is a Willis/ Lewis type.

by TAW on May 4, 2010 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

What?!?! You can't mock the mockster.

That’s like saying: “God was wrong when he made water wet.”

I now only hope that Ro can come within a fraction of the provided middle linebacking excellence that Morrison gave this team. Well, that and we didn’t anger Mel too much.

Get your virgins ready Al, we may need a sacrifice.

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 4, 2010 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

carry on

that red-tailed hawk looking turkey buzzard deserves all you can give

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 4, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not a stat guy

but what I saw last year was the line holding up well, but no LB or safeties filling the gaps.
Time and time again, a runner would be clogged up at the line, then veer out to a wide open hole which a linebacker or safety was supposed to fill but didn’t. Morrison is a classic case of a guy who had a lot of nice stats but never seemed to make a tackle at the line of scrimmage, and Howard never did.
I have a lot of free time so watch a lot more football than I probably should. What I saw on really good defensive teams were linebackers flying all over the field creating havoc, when I watched the Raiders I never saw that. Tyvon Branch was generally very good at closing the hole, but where were the backers? On this site they always talk as if the line is totally at fault for a shoddy run defense, I see it differently, the line disrupts the runners and the linebackers are supposed to clean up.
Since the Raider defense was always on the field about a third more than the other team, it makes sense that they would eventually break down. Fix the offense, the Raiders have enough good players on the line to have a good defense.

by Laoren on May 4, 2010 3:27 PM PDT reply actions  

+2

especially regarding the time of posession.

by markdog333 on May 5, 2010 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't forget about the runs that started wide

then the opposing RB cuts back through the hole Morrison left while over pursuing and not trusting his teammates.
The Raider DTs did not help with the run much either especially Warren, but it was linebacker play that was mostly at fault.

by rambis64 on May 5, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

I really wish Kellen Heard the best of luck. Al has always had a nack for finding players

in the later rounds or even undrafted guys. So maybe this guy is alot better than we think, or maybe he’s just a big guy who’s going to be used for rotation. Who knows.

As for vetrans, there’s no way we can bring in Ngata or Ratliff. Mostly because those guy’s are awesome and their teams absolutely love them. Pat Williams is like 40 years old, and Kevin Williams would be a tough guy to grab as well. Shaun Rogers would be perfect though..Big and powerful. He’d look awesome in Silver & Black

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 3:28 PM PDT reply actions  

im not

seein the oakland raiders makin a move on any one of those DTs not one! why? because i feel like we wouldve attempted a move on someone other than Henderson, god gregg would great and haynesworth would be even better! ugh i dont see baltimore or washington cuttin ties tho…

Will the real John Gruden please stand up!?!?!

JaKe is douchebag!!!

by daleomadness on May 4, 2010 3:36 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I wouldn't be against adding another DT

however I think Houston and Seymour allow a lot of flexibility when on the field together interchangeable between the DE and DT position so i think we could possibly add more depth but i dont think we are in need of spending major FA dollars.
Speaking of which it sounds like LaMarr really made an impact at mini camp but this pick seems to be being overshadowed by big Ro and the tackles and after watching more and more tape of him i am really excited to see what he can do.

"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour

Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'

by Ozraider on May 4, 2010 3:45 PM PDT reply actions  

nice article Sons i enjoy the more analytical angle you are able to bring to the table.

I also think a major part of Seymour’s inconsistency comes from the fact he had basically no camp or preseason with the Raiders so this year with a full camp and preseason under his belt under the scheme he should be more consistent week to week.

"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour

Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'

by Ozraider on May 4, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was shocked at the NT types the Raiders passed on in this draft.

There complete lack of concern has eased my worries, but I still think they need something in the middle.

I like the DT position for passing downs, but I worry that the defense will ever get teams to these passing downs.

Forgive me of my bar graphery ignorance, but do you have a link to the explanation of the process that raised those fabulous green and red towers?

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 4, 2010 3:55 PM PDT reply actions  

he has pretty obvious weight and motivation issues

a common thread between drafts over the few years is character.

"I'll be the guy on top of the Quarterback" - Richard Seymour

Here they come baby, Just win baby, Feel the storm of the cold autum wind baby
Its the Oakland Raiders, Get your mouthpiece
You in the black hole, With the black beast! - Ice Cube 'Raider Nation'

by Ozraider on May 4, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Those weight & motivation concerns

will be dealt with by a Ray Lewis cleat up his ass if he doesn’t get with it.

"We have to win eight. I'll be crushed if we don't win eight." CRN...Eat it BN, lol

by S Jay Bruin on May 4, 2010 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

great thread sons of blanda! another question about seymour:

how many teams can take on seymours salary for the 1 year and i believe he is being paid 12.5 million?

by sports with steve on May 4, 2010 4:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I like Heard.

I like his size, I like his experience on both sides of the line, and I like his demeanor.

I think we need one more DT at 320lbs.

by xville on May 4, 2010 4:25 PM PDT reply actions  

nice sets of charts sob! according to the roster we have ::::::::::::::::::::::::

8 linebackers
4 d tackles
6 d ends
note seymour is counted as a d end but can play dt. maybe a trade with one of those teams sons listed would take a lb and d end for a good d t!

by sports with steve on May 4, 2010 4:57 PM PDT reply actions  

So who would you be willing to trade right now?

If Cleveland was interested in trading Shaun Rogers, who would you give up to acquire him?

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

A basket full of players - all of the following for a good DT:

Chris Morris, Kyle Boller, Erik Pears, Tony Stewart, Stanford Routt and Johnny Lee Higgins (good riddance to them).

Then I would trade Chris Johnson and Cooper Carlisle for a good OT.

Then I would sleep soundly.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 4, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cleveland would gladly take Johnnie Lee and Stanford off our hands. They're hungry for

a WR and CB. And I wouldn’t trade Chris Johnson yet, were not sure Walter McFadden can hold down the right side.

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes, I'm saving Chris Johnson to trade for the OT we need. I'm not buying the Gallery supports Henderson rap

The fact is we had two of the worst OTs in the league – Green got traded and Henderson remains. I’m counting on Veldheer. Hell, even Carlisle makes Henderson’s play look better. DT and OT should be our mantra until the front office gets the message.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 4, 2010 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't wanna give off the wrong vibes though.

Oakland had a great draft, and I don’t wanna look like a ungrateful fan by asking for more even though they brought in more.

I’m pleading for DT more than anything. Im afraid our men our too small to hold up against the larger men of the league. But, maybe Dez Bryant can be the next John Randle. A small and undrafted DT who played with a chip on his shoulder

by JaKe. on May 4, 2010 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Correction re: Gerard Warren

The Raiders released Gerard Warren on March 11th. He signed with the New England Patriots as a free agent on April 24th. He was not traded.

Anthony Montgomery just got released by the Redskins. He’s 6-6 330 and has more experience than Heard. A possibility?

by LiveAdam on May 4, 2010 6:30 PM PDT reply actions  

He would be nice.

he has ideal size, but i don’t know much about him. Doesn’t hurt to bring him in though. :)

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

by patriotguy2 on May 4, 2010 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Montgomery Waived

Anthony Montgomery got waived yesterday. Apparently the Redskins didn’t feel he fit into a 3-4 scheme. He lost his starting job to Haynesworth last year. He’s got to be better than Chris Cooper or William Joseph – I say we bring him in for some OTA competition.

by LiveAdam on May 4, 2010 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long as he isn't a guy with a lot of injury

issues, I say get him for the big guy rotation with Heard.

by xville on May 4, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here ya go

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/7902/index.html

I like that he is young: 25 years old, with 4 years in the NFL under his belt.

He’s big: 6’6" tall (2" taller than Warren), 330lbs.

It is understandable for Haynesworth to eat up all that playing time for that kind of money.

by xville on May 4, 2010 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's 5 years younger

and 20lbs heavier than William Joseph.

by xville on May 4, 2010 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wasn't our Dline in top 5 in sacks?

plus we made improvements it would make little sense to change it.

by raiderfan21 on May 4, 2010 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

We’ve been so good at stopping the run and therefore we should not change it!

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on May 4, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

and the scheme, with a much better varying scheme, we should be better against the run.

Plus we got McClain and Houston, and Wimbley and Scott as starters…It will be different, trust the staff and players. We will improve against the Run AND STOMP TENNESSE in the opener.

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 5, 2010 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

It’s nice of you to put the blame on one guy.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on May 5, 2010 5:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

That would be wonderful if it were true, but Kirk was only a contributing factor

I agree with brhynno’s domino theory, the chain reaction starts with the DTs. It’s like a house – if the foundation is weak even your best attempt to frame over it using the the highest grade materials and exceeding code standards won’t overcome the poor base.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 5, 2010 6:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. Adding Rolando McClain will help with the run defense, but how much can he help it without competence at the defensive tackle position? We’ll see.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on May 5, 2010 7:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

U guys have not faith in Kelly,Bryant, and Seymour

I think we got the biggest DEs in the league. So won’t that help? They aren’t gonna run around the tackles they are gonna run through them. I also blame Howard and the other OLB before Scott stepped up.

by raiderfan21 on May 5, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

None of those guys ran through anyone last year - at best they held the line

I’m still pining over Linval Joseph but like Houston a lot – just believe pure DT was the best way to go for us.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 5, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well U and Cable are going seperate ways.

Weren’t u the one saying Bryant got bigger? Seymour gout doubled teamed alot and Kelly must of had it hard when Warren is next to him.

by raiderfan21 on May 5, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

While I feel the new alignment will be vastly improved, and will help out the linebackers in gap control

The truly solid interior offensive line teams will collapse our defensive middle, and we’ll see some of the same thing we saw last year.

It’s tough to find tapes that demonstrate it perfectly, but while some above mentioned it was linebackers failure to plug holes, I argue that their vision into backfields was almost immediately compromised when they failed, and the line of scrimmage was dominated by opponents’ offensive lines more often than not. This is not the job of linebackers; if the D middle could simply win the line of scrimmage more often, the qb’s would have no pocket to step up into and out of trouble, and the defensive ends would’ve gotten to the qbs more often.

I’m afraid there are few impact guys available on any teams, at least those with whom the respective teams would be willing to part. I hope we can do something to acquire a true NT to play zero technique, and free up the UT, the DEs, and rushing LBs and safeties to do their thing. Where we’ll get him, I don’t know, but I remain hopeful.

As it stands, we’ll still demonstrate inconsistency against the run. We will see improvement, but the inconsistency will haunt the current interior D line. I expect big things from Houston (I think he’ll line up at UT and DE, but more often UT), Desmond Bryant, and even Tommy Kelly, with improved play from the ends and linebackers, but a hole remains at our DT spot.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on May 4, 2010 6:36 PM PDT reply actions  

We need a DT

I liked the Lamarr Houston pick – he was a DT in college, but I am puzzled by Cable’s cryptic comment that “he (Houston) will play defensive end for us.”

If Houston will not play DT, then, that hole remains unfilled and we need a DT.

by shadowfreder on May 4, 2010 6:42 PM PDT reply actions  

We have 3 hybrids

Seymour,kelly, and Houston. Nobody will get comfortable playing 1 guy. Shaughnessy can both rush the passer and get the ball carrier. Groves and Richardson are our pass rushers. I guess Bryant must have really impressed Cable and might be the only pure DT we have. I think this line will be great.

by raiderfan21 on May 4, 2010 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

The D they want they don't want DTs

They want 4 guys that can move around anywhere on the Line that can stop the run and i think we got it

by raiderfan21 on May 4, 2010 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

They are Hybrids.

Even though Seymour is listed as a DE he will line up in the middle. Same goes for Houston. Kelly even though listed at DT can still line up at DE. Bryant and Shughnessy are the only guys who can’t move but they can line up on different sides. Do u know how confused the line is gonna get when every 2 downs they are going against someone different. The only Problem is when they run up the gut but thats when our new MLB comes into play. Cabe belives enough in Kelly,Bryant,Seymour and sometimes Houston to take care of the middle.

by raiderfan21 on May 4, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't like to drag up the negative past, but Cable was praising the offensive line before the season opened

and expressing his believe in those players. I believe Houston’s an upgrade over Warren and that Bryant will be better, of course, than last season. But Kelly is the same and so is Joseph. Still haven’t seen any game film on Heard just still pictures of him that haven’t produced much confidence.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 4, 2010 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

What happened week 1? I'm pretty sure both Oline and Dline were great in week 1

Then Gallery went down and so did our season. Not blameing Gallery theres alotta blame to go around but didn’t u see us smashing guys? Dmac was getting like 6 yards a carry until he fumbled. Russell was getting like 8 seconds to throw. And the Dline wasn’t there like 2 or 3 injuries on SDs Oline Hardwick was out for awhile. So minus Cornell and add Campbell and Veldheer thats a big improvement. Subtract Warren and add Houston and Bryant even bigger improvement. Thats the last thing we need is to add another high paid player who doesn’t workout.

by raiderfan21 on May 4, 2010 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

It could happen again with Gallery - just look at weeks 3,4,5 - total meltdown. We've added to rookies

and removed Green. Yes, I believe we’ll be better given experience and personnel. But, comparing our line to our competitions’ causes me to project an 8-8 record … and that assumes improvement against the rush.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 5, 2010 6:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

The O-line worries me.

I think Satele will be a huge key. He needs to become the player Cable thought he’d be when he traded for him.

Also the RT spot. My god. This could be an absolute disaster! Green was frustrating, but at least you knew what you were getting!

I fail to see how Walker can be a Zone Blocking Tackle and Barnes has done nothing, but dissapoint me. I don’t expect much contribution from either rook, this year.

My point in talking about the o-line in this d-line post is: Yes the Raiders need DT help, but I want the right guys. This is a young team, I think their potential is a couple of years away. I don’t want them to bring in people to fill holes for this year.

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 5, 2010 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, I want Cooper at the LT position...and Campbell on the RT

This is what I want: Henderson,Gallery,Satele,Campbell,Veldheer/Walker
That Lineup would be great, I want Campbell to start regardless, on Guard, and if Walker is good at RT then him over Veldheer, and Veldheer on the bench, Campbell is strong, sexy, and was a potential 1st rounder. Veldheer is good no doubt but its all on Walker.

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 5, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it was a hilarious joke...As for the lineup I put, that is what I wish.

I think if Cable would’ve been interested this would’ve happened long ago. Unless we give them our 2nd, then Al will be pissed cuz he will miss out on 2 great rounds, So he will not budge and leave it as is…

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 5, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

But...but

Campbell has never played guard and was described as not being pro ready at Tackle.

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 5, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

True, key word: At Tackle. Any big, buff, strong, guy can play guard.

All you have to do is keep the slow ass DT infront of you, on check. No technique required, just push him back hard and do the thrust facepalm, like jabs to his face.

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on May 5, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope you are right about Campbell being ready.

I doubt it, but I hope so. I think he will undergo a learning curve. He doesn’t even really have the much college playing experience.

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 5, 2010 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a ZBS that requires quicker thinking than for PBS. Plus there's

pulling and switching off on some pass blocking. I’ve heard Campbell speak and he sounds slow witted. If he does have a learning disability it will be exposed in the ZBS.

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 5, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Houston Was "DE" 2 Seasons -n- Moved To "DT"

Now he is back at his original position and it has been said he will line up over the “TE” to use that miss-match to his advantage to be disruptive while providing run-support on that side of the line…So he will be going against the "RT"s n "TE"s which means their “O” can’t release their “TE” into a pattern because he’s needed as a blocker…Meanwhile their “LOT” will be matched up against Richard Seymour and have his hands full there…The “LG”-“C”-“RG” will have to contend with our "DT"s in rotation and "LB"s blitzing…If our "DE"s can squeeze in while the "DT"s n "LB"s hold the middle the “QB” n "RB"s are in troubled waters…Meanwhile our "DB"s are in coverage and don’t have to worry about the “TE” or "RB"s as often because their needed as blockers…

Well…On paper anyway…

The real thing that will make all this work is an improved “O” that can score points and force the "O"s into playing into the teeth of our “D” which is our pass defense…We have stocked up on "DB"s with speed toughness n size who could be part of a “Hi-Bread” like a 4-2-5 and get after the "QB"s n "RB"s w blitzes from all possible directions…Can’t wait to see it in application…

by PantyRaider on May 4, 2010 9:45 PM PDT reply actions  

But we shouldn't go in expecting a dominant performance against Johnson.

It’s Chris Johnson we’re talking about. he runs over basically EVERYbody. Hopefully we’ll keep him contained, and if we do that, then I am happy as well.

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

by patriotguy2 on May 5, 2010 4:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

"DT" Rotation Keeps'em Fresh

The way I figure it is our "DE"s stay on the field….Their both high motor players and strong against the run and can get after the "QB"s….Rotation comes at the “DT” position too keep fresh bodies in the run “D” w help inside from our new “LB” core…If Houston can occupy the “TE” n “RT” while Seymour occupies the “LT” n “LG” than that only leaves the “C” n “RG” to contain 2 "DT"s n “MLB”….Somewhere a player should be uncovered and able to get after the “RB”/“QB”….Maybe run-blitzes that close down the inside lanes and force the back to go outside into the "DE"s n "OLB"s….If we can get Johnson going horizontal half the job is already done…

The “NT” position may be maned by Kellen Heard if he works out so we can play a 3-4 scheme against the top running teams…He is also a very high motor guy who played both sides of the ball in college…Having all that “OL” experience should also help him develop quickly because he already understands what the blocking techniques are and how to counter them…If I’m our coaches I have him spend some time with the “OL” coaches so he learns more of those techniques so he can continue to develop his own techniques to counter them…

With someone like him in the middle and Seymour n Houston at the ends we should be fairly stout…McClain n Goethel could make a very stout middle with rotation at the “OLB” positions between "DE"s n “LB” dependant upon scheme needs…We also have tough "S"s who could play up for the “8 in da box” scenario like what we have constantly faced…

Again the real factor here is going to be our “O”….If it can score and take Johnson out of the game we have already won that battle…

by PantyRaider on May 5, 2010 4:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

We are set for the year

It’s not the greatest but there is a massive improvment. We needto stay where were we are and build through the draft.

"We can't stop here... This is bat country."

by Kwester421 on May 5, 2010 12:02 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Stats

out of curiosity, did Seymor’s have more positive stats playing inside or outside? Main problem is Kelly, we’re burden with his contract and adding quality players unbalances our resources. Last point, it doesn’t matter that we traded seymor for a 1st last year, it’s what is he worth now and can we improve by moving him? For example, if he’s worth a 3rd and we can get 2nd with freed up money to go after another a better player at a better price, you do the trade.

by raiders4liffe on May 5, 2010 12:27 AM PDT reply actions  

Seymour will play exclusively at DT

Before the draft, I was saying the Raiders needed to draft at least 2 DT’s ,or draft one and pick one up in free agency or trade for one. When they didn’t do that, and Cable said Houston will play DE, it’s only obvious that Seymour will exclusively play DT. By the way, the Raiders didn’t trade Warren, they flat out released him and the Patriots picked him up. There is still plenty of time for the Raiders to get a DT off waivers or trade for one. If I was running the Raiders, I would cut Russell and trade for Haynesworth and give Russell’s money to Albert. I was really surprised when the Raiders didn’t draft Cam Thomas, when he slipped so far down in the draft. Maybe the Raiders really like DT Bryant and figured he will rotate in and out of the rotation just fine.

by Captain Chaos on May 5, 2010 5:08 AM PDT reply actions  

Is That A Guess Or Established Fact

He is still listed as “DE” but as i remember so was #75 but he played all over the line…

by PantyRaider on May 5, 2010 5:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I see Green Bay's draft last year as a model Oakland is using for this year's draft.

They drafted BJ Raji and Clay Matthews. Those guys contributed in making the defense rank 1st against the run and improved their win total by 5 games. I don’t think we’re going 10-6 by any means but with improved QB play and at least addressing the run D (McClain, Houston, Heard) it will be somewhat improved. All I ask is for allowing an average of 110 yards per game and we can have a winning season. Middle of the road run defense is much better than dead last.

by TAW on May 5, 2010 1:15 PM PDT reply actions  

It worked and they made the playoffs immediately following a 6-10 season.

I can understand why Oakland is wanting to emulate that. Especially since this looks like a make or break year for Cable.

by TAW on May 5, 2010 2:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Good point, SOB

And thanks for the link to that site. Had never heard of it before.

by rightnasty on May 5, 2010 5:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Here's my question though

We talk about the necessity of size to play in the middle. Ideally, that would be muscle mass, would it not? Now Vince Wilfork is listed at 6-2, 325 lbs, and Lamarr Houston at 6-3 305. But, here’s Vince:

and here’s Lamarr:

The only difference I see is a big gut on the former. So why couldn’t Lamarr play DT?

by rightnasty on May 5, 2010 5:49 PM PDT reply actions  

Awww

I was really hoping you could explain it, since I seriously doubt Cable could.

by rightnasty on May 5, 2010 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm actually glad that Houston is moving to DE.

He’s very explosive and is able to give that bull rush from the outside.

by JaKe. on May 5, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cable Said He Will Line Up Over "TE" To Take Advantage Of That Mismatch

LamHou was a “DE” in college but moved later to “DT” where he also excelled…He has the versatility to play anywhere on the line…We have had that type here before in the body of #75 who was also listed as “DE”…Also now we have Seymour who is listed as “DE” but plays the whole right side…If now we have 2 such players and the return of our “DLC” from the last time we were winning than all I can say is “Yippie”….

What could we look like with 2 “Howie” types….Seymour on the right and LamHou on the left…Will they stunt…Will they line up as "DT"s with our other "DE"s manning the outside…How about in a 3-4 with “Twin Howies” n a “NT” like Kellen Heard who has a high motor and played both the “OL” n “DL” at the lower level….How many players ever did that and were good on both sides of the line…I have high hopes for that guy and he is needed if he can fill that position…

Last time we played the 3-4 Bill Pickel was the “NT”….He was listed at 6’5" 260#s….Drafted 2nd rd “83” 2 seasons after Howie…We switched back to the 4-3 under Shell and have been in that type of scheme virtually ever sense…Now there is talk of a “Hi-Bread” and the use of the 3-4 and we seem to be drafting and signing players who fit that possibility…The word is we will be diverse with something new and exciting so all we can do now is speculate what that could look like…

by PantyRaider on May 5, 2010 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

What I see is that there is no chance in hell

Wilfork is only 20 lbs heavier than Houston.

I think when people are being funny, they are actually being serious and when people are being serious, it's actually really funny.

by noontide on May 5, 2010 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great post as usual SOB

Let me go ahead and put my “Fuck the Donkies” icing on that cake.

by golfswithglock on May 7, 2010 9:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.
Start posting about the Raiders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Indianapolis Colts: Still The Team To Beat In The AFC

Photo +15 updates

NFL Week 1: Previewing And Predicting Every Game Of Opening Weekend

Photo link

Buffalo Rumblings Interviews Jim Kelly About The Bills' Progress

More from SBNation.com >


Captain

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

Chiefs

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Raiders_small LiveAdam

Crew

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Edge_small Rated-R Superstar

Butch-cassidy-paul_1202903c_small noontide

Silver_and_black_is_back_small B.A.Armstrong

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda