Competition Creates Character
One thing that has been missing for some time in Oakland is a strong sense of competition. That's not to say that competition has not been present in Oakland over the past few years, but it was nowhere near the level it is at this season. In the past, you may have seen a competition like the battle for the starting QB position in 2007 between Daunte Culpepper and Josh McCown, or the competition for middle linebacker in 2009 between Ricky Brown and Kirk Morrison. But never recently have there been so many positions up for grabs in the Oakland Raiders camp as there is this season. Let's take a look at some position that will be up for grabs.
Quarterback:
Jason Campbell might not feel much pressure right now, only being pushed in mini-camp and OTA's by Charlie Frye and Kyle Boller, but once Bruce Gradkowski puts himself into the mix, he will be under tremendous pressure. Gradkowski is not going to lay down and let this job that he believes to be his go unchallenged to the newcomer, regardless of their past draft stocks or stat lines.
While Jason Campbell attempts to form a bond with his new teammates, Gradkowski has already been to battle with many of these guys and they believe that he has the tools to get the job done despite whoever outside of the team thinks that Gradkowski is not the long-term solution. Some have already declared this job as belonging to Jason Campbell, but Bruce Gradkowski would certainly disagree with that assessment. It's not like Gradkowski already has a fork in him, as I'm sure JaMarcus Russell does as we speak.
Running Back:
Although they are teammates and will certainly need to work together to accomplish a sound ground game for Oakland this year, Michael Bush and Darren McFadden will be at each other's throats this preseason vying for the starting position. It is certain that with the dismissal of Justin Fargas, Oakland is looking for a new good man to take the bulk of the carries and lead this team to glory.
McFadden has never lived up to the hype of being the best running back from the class of 2008, with his ongoing injury issues and fumble issues. So far, his best contributions have come via the receiving game, in contrast to Michael Bush who currently owns the Raiders previous three 100 yard rushing games. Bush has also shown a knack for making those break-away runs that McFadden was supposed to show his skills on. By all accounts, the leader of this race should be Bush as he has more between-the-tackles potential. In the NFL you need to have a back who can punch it up the gut, and McFadden is more a change-up, outside type runner who wants to beat you around the corner. Plus in the five games where Bush has been given the ball 15 or more times, Bush has averaged 134.8 yards from scrimmage.
Wide Receiver:
I've heard this question asked so much over the past few weeks: Who are the starting WR's this year? The good news is it's a wide open competition between players who all have tremendous upside. The bad news is that they are all, for the most part, inexperienced in the NFL.
However, they are not all inexperienced as football players. Louis Murphy won two NCAA National Championships during his time as a Florida Gator. He also showed glimpses into a bright future outperforming many rookie wide receivers of other teams in 2009. Johnnie Lee Higgins was expected to make an impact in last year's receiving corp., the trouble was, Higgins got blown up in the first game of the year by Chargers safety Eric Weddle and then when he finally did get over that shoulder injury, he got smashed in the face in Pittsburgh on an illegal hit by Steelers safety Ryan Mundy. It was a setback for Higgins, who now enters his fourth NFL season as the Raiders most experienced NFL receiver.
The Raiders WR's of 2010 will feature two more Higgins type talents with 2009's UDFA Nick Miller expected to return to action, and the addition of fourth round pick Jacoby Ford. Miller was nicknamed "Mr. Darkhorse" for his outstanding performance in the 2009 offseason activities and the early part of the preseason; however he never fully recovered from a broken shin. His potential showcased last season was enough to keep him around for another stint. Ford is expected to be used exclusively in the return game, but his potential is also bursting at the seams as a wide receiver. With a little bit of developmental work on route running, he could be a featured deep threat for Oakland.
Todd Watkins made some big time plays for Oakland last year. Both plays that come to my immediate memory converted huge third downs, one against the Kansas City Chiefs in week two, and one against the Pittsburgh Steelers in week 13. During his first season at BYU, Watkins totaled 52 receptions for 1042 yards and six touchdowns. He averaged a Mountain West Conference record 94.7 yards per game, and averaged 20 yards per catch. Following that season, he was named a first team all MWC and honorable mention All-American. Sports Illustrated named him the best deep threat in the nation. In Oakland, Watkins abilities are highly underrated, but could come in handy in those much needed third down situations.
All these guys aside, my projected starters this year are Darrius Heyward-Bey and Chaz Schilens. Heyward-Bey is said to have made significant improvements to his game and showcased his newfound hands on the Raiders media day OTA practice last Wednesday. Schilens has yet to put on his running shoes this year, but had a tremendous offseason in 2009 in which it's been said that he did not drop a single pass. One thing for sure, as Jason Campbell recently put it, "It's a young football team, but at the same time, we have a lot of speed." Speed and QB timing will be the key to success for the Raiders 2010 receivers.
Offensive Line:
Several position are going to be wide open along the offensive line this year, however, I'd expect the starting line-up to be similar to the one that ended the season last year, except with Robert Gallery returning to left guard, and his replacement, Langston Walker finding his natural position back at right tackle.
The thing about the offensive line that makes it different this year will be the competition that the back-ups provide as they attempt to make themselves well known commodities. LT Mario Henderson and RT Langston Walker will have a big time challenge from offensive tackle back-ups, Khalif Barnes and rookie Jared Veldheer. Right guard Cooper Carlisle, I suspect, will have significant competition from rookie Bruce Campbell as well as veteran G/C Chris Morris. While the line may not be exactly what the doctor ordered, the competition will create better play than many outsiders project.
Defensive End:
2009 rookie Matt Shaughnessy made a name for himself in the second half of the 2009 season filling in for recently released DE Greg Ellis. Odds are in his favor to start at the position at the beginning of the 2010 season, but odds don't always come through in Vegas, so why would they always come through in Alameda?
Shaughnessy and returning starter Richard Seymour will have heavy competition from the very competitive rookie Lamarr Houston, who comes from the #1 ranked NCAA run defense, as well as fourth year pro Jay Richardson, who is quietly becoming a steady competitor with the Raiders organization. Quentin Groves, who I believe will end up playing DE, and UDFA out of Cincinnati Alex Daniels will be giving Houston and Richardson a run for their money as back-ups on the squad.
Outside Linebackers:
The Raiders brought in a plethora of linebackers this year and brought the total on the squad this year to 11. With only three available positions in the 4-3 defense, somebody is going to be the odd man out. There are some new faces in the mix like Kamerion Wimbley and Travis Goethel. Then there are some veterans like last year's starters Ricky Brown and Thomas Howard. Also in the mix will be 2009 rookies Slade Norris and David Nixon. Trevor Scott finished the 2009 season as a weak-side starting linebacker, but he has his work cut out for him facing a high level of competition that will be looking to take his place at every bump in the road.
Right now, the projected starters would be Scott, 2010 rookie Rolando McClain in the middle, and the strong-side LB would be Kamerion Wimbley. I expect Wimbley's position to be the one in highest doubt, being that he is new to the team and will be challenged strongly by both Howard and Brown, two guys who started at his position in 2009.
Free Safety:
Last year, this position was split between Michael Huff and Hiram Eugene. Both guys are good players, but the trouble is, each one has what the other one lacks. Michael Huff is supposed to be the guy who is good in coverage, and Eugene is supposed to be the sure tackler that the defense can depend on to stop the run. The wildcard of this group is Mike Mitchell, the 2009 second round pick from Ohio University. Mitchell has great range on the field, good vision, and he is sure to be a solid tackler at this level.
Throw in one of head coach Tom Cable's favorites from the 2009 offseason, Jerome Boyd as well as newcomer from Michigan Stevie Brown and you got yourself a good old fashioned wide open competition. My personal favorite at this point is Mike Mitchell. I'd love to see a Branch/Mitchell combination in the deep secondary for Oakland. With Nnamdi Asomugha and Chris Johnson, who are both good in coverage, tackling, and run support playing the cornerback positions it could mark the return of the "Soul Patrol" in the Raiders secondary come 2010.
This competition where no one is safe will result in positive results for the Oakland Raiders moving forward. The competition will create character amongst the brothers on this team who will battle together as soldiers in 2010. Each player will push the other to their limit in offseason activities and training camp. These guys are all competitors and they are all NFL caliber talents. They will all want to be on the field just as much as their counterparts do. It's going to be fun to watch how this whole thing shakes out during the four preseason games. The Raiders 2010 offseason has given Raider Nation a legitimate reason to be excited for the upcoming season.
Follow me on Twitter: Raidersblogger
Email me your Raiders questions @ bret@tfdssports.com
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
nice.
i love these, very information oriented, with ur own conclusions tossed, makes for a great debate platform…. everything i hear about GOETHEL says he is a stud… hopefully he is a steal.
I'll Get Inside Your FACE!
I can Agree with most of this
I don’t think we have a QB battle at all. We all know our offensive line is bad as of right now we only have a lot of WHAT IF players on the Oline. I really don’t know about the LB’s too, I think the Rookie can be good but he is going to be playing with 2 guys that should be playing 3-4 rushers. The defense should work more on turnovers we had a good number of sacks but no turnovers. We are going to play more zone this year because our LB can’t run with Tight ends or stay in front of the RB’s in pass coverage.
I can't stand the fact that our Defense is completely fit for the 3-4, yet we stilll stic to the out-dated 4-3..
The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.
Still...I mean, if we made the move, we'd have one of the best 3-4's in the league.
The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.
The Packers
thought they had that last year too when they moved to a 3-4. Not so much. I like the hybrid idea…if the players can handle it.
The Packers ranked first in overall defense last year after switching to a 3-4 and improved to 11-5 from 10-6 the previous year.
Obviously it worked.
If my mother put on a helmet and shoulder pads and a uniform that wasn't the same as the one I was wearing, I'd run over her if she was in my way. And I love my mother.
Bo Jackson
No
They were ranked #2 behind the Jets. That being said, how many Packer games did you watch? I saw all of them. At times they looked good in the 3-4 and many other times awful. Ask Packer fans how much they love the 3-4. Their 3-4 looked great against Arizona in the playoffs didn’t it?
I don't think we have the linebackers to play a 3-4
I was lookin up a 3-3-5 stack defense. I know it sounds stupid but look at it. We could have both Mitchell and Branch on the Field. Huff NNamdi CJ all can tackle so we don’t have to worry about the edge. The only problem can we control the offensive line. I think it can work but it puts a lot of pressure on the Dline. We can blitz out of a lot different looks. The reason i don’t think we can run a 3-4 we don’t have another inside LB Howard or Brown can’t take on gaurds all game. I know it sounds crazy but we have the speed on defense run it.
We don't have the linebackers? Our LB's would make the easiest transition to the 34.
Wimbley. Scott, Groves and McClain are all 3-4 LB’s.
The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.
Yeah isn't your problem, not having a NT?
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 25, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
isn't it your problem too?
I am here to inspire and light fires~~~Where there is smoke in the ears, there is me on the mind~~~
by B.A.Armstrong on Jun 25, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Eh,
not sure I would call it a problem. We went 12-3 without Williams last season. I was actually commenting on you guys switching to the 3-4 base defense, and how from what I can tell you don not have the personnel to make the transition. I wasn’t taking a shot at you guys just stating that from my perspective LB is not the problem as somebody suggested previously, it’s NT. If I’m wrong about that you guys can correct me all you want, but I really don’t see how the Chargers NT issues have anything to do with the conversation at hand.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 26, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I guess. We have some options. More than you atleast.
The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.
OK then.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 26, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Scott, Groves haven't done anything out of a 3-4
Wimbley and McClain are the only ones. And of all the LB’s you named I don’t think either of them will have a 10 sack season or 4 QB FF. We have 3-4 linebackers if we were playing Madden. Plus to run the 3-4 or 3-3 stack we would have to blitz a lot I don’t think Al is going to like that. I think we should stick to a 4-3 and run stunts up front. I am for blitzing but rushing 5 isn’t going to get it.
its not outdated
its actually a good defense we just execute bad defesinve schemes, but whose to say we’re sticking to it this year
Lamarr is fucking huge! Haha. I'm stoked to see him play..
The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.
Lamarr is fucking huge!
Thats what she said? LOL
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 25, 2010 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't know which of these guys would play NT.
I can see some looks of 3-4 but not regularly. Hence why this team didn’t draft Cam Thomas or Linval Joseph when they had an oppurtunity. The DEs and OLBS as well as McClain do seem perfectly fit for the transisition though.
A lot better sense of humor at MHR. :P
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 26, 2010 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions
If that qualified as humorous at MHR it doesn't surprise me. Maybe it was funny 20 years ago when it was fresh
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jun 26, 2010 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions
LOVE YOUR STYLE !!!!
In total agreement with just about everything !! Huff will be your starter at the Free, unless we get a BIG suprise from one of the Rooks. Branch is a straight line hitter, great for Run Defense, but from side line to side line, Huff has him beat, hands down!!! Mitchell might have a chance at starting this year, that would be great, FEAR Across the middle has been sorely missing, since Lott left !!!! The corner situation is totally set. No worries there !!!! The 3-4 will be used by us, with varied formations and players, along with the 46, goalline 52, and varied manzone, 2-5-4. We got all kind of options when it comes to this years Defense!!! Far as I’m comcerned, one long time RaiderFan4lyfe here, we’re having luxury problems we having had in years !!!!! In other words……IT"S ALL GOOD in the COLISEUM HOOD !!!!!!
I don't really see competition on the line, though. All these guys can make the team
The real question is at the tackle spot, and it’s not truly a position battle, and rather a player by default kinda thing. It’s really high time we addressed that question mark.
I agree with the rest, and am beginning to wonder about the safety position, and the amount of guys we’re carrying. Something’s actually gotta give. Who will it be, and will it be in a trade? You know Branch, Mitchell, and Brown, because of his special team prowess (yes, you will see prowess) are safe. Will Huff, or Eugene be dealt? Switch positions, like Nnamdi? Can they make the transition?
suddenly, there are more questions here, and we still don’t know who’ll be the FS and who the strong. I’d say Tyvon at strong is a lock, but know that many will disagree.
Anyways. Nice post, as usual B.A. I love the positional battles, and it’s really the only reason I watch preseason games. They’ll be unfreakingbelievably awesome this time!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Info
Great article. Lots of facts and little opinion. Thanks for treating us like adults.
Nice job breaking it down B.A.
I agree on the QB situation. Grad’s not going to lay down, ever. No, I’m not high (heh,heh) but, it would not surprise me to see him as the starter at the season opener. The only point of contention I have is in the WR dept. If DHB really has improved as everyone says he has ,then yes ,he will start. Murphy will start on the other side,in my opinion. Facts Chaz 24 games total yds 591 TDs 4 Murphy 16 games total yds 521 TDs 4 . Yes Chaz was injured,and is still rehabbing, but I think Murphy and Bey start. We shall see. Keep up the good work. Monte Poole wrote yet another insulting Raider article the other day on the move back to Oakland. I suggested if he were lacking for POSITIVE material on the Raiders that he come to this blog as we are Raider Nation.
An hour later he erased my comments. Kiss our collective asses Monte! R.F.F.L.
Did Monte Poole really censor your comment!?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jun 24, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't know if he censored it Sons but......
After I wrote it Sons I saw it on the page. Went back 1/2 hr later and it was still there. an hour later mine and all the comments (which were ALL negative towards him were gonzo. Here’s what i said . Monte, if you are looking for writing material I offer for your perusal the blog “Silver and Black Pride” and told him where it could be found. I told him this was no candy a$$ “The raiders can do no wrong” blog ,but rather a place where Raider Nation can come to discuss team needs and problems. I also told him we get input from people like Rich Gannon and Tyvon Branch. I wasn’t snottty and spelled ass like you see it above . I told him that the move back to Oakland was the best thing that ever happened in the mind of Raider Nation, contrary to his "we all lost when they did " article. I also questioned why, after an awesome draft and offseason he would write an article like that (that’s what led to pointing him in our direction for POSITIVE material). I guess he didn’t dig it. So did he censor me, who knows? He erased me and 2 other guys comments for sure. Guys I’m sick of these nose in the air type J.O.s that write trash about the Raiders . A lot of positive things have transpired in the last 90 days for our team and all guys like Poole can do is dig up dirt. Silver and Black Pride IS the mouthpiece for Raider Nation and i’m proud to be associated with it. We Bleed Black. R.F.F.R.
Monte Poole ryhmes with _________?
A. Fool
B. Stool
C. Tool
D. Asshole
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Jun 25, 2010 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Asshole?
Would that be pronounced “ass-hool”?
by Raider Zealot on Jun 26, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
+100
I am here to inspire and light fires~~~Where there is smoke in the ears, there is me on the mind~~~
by B.A.Armstrong on Jun 25, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I hated his article
It was not even worth engaging, but that’s my way of dealing with annoying stuff.
by Spirals galore on Jun 25, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Monte Poole
I’m glad that I am not the only one who took offense with his article. I’ll admit that once I saw where he was heading that I skimmed his rantings. Saying that it was a bad day when the Raiders came back to Oakland makes no sense at all. The only place that was a bad day was among the candy-assed, wine sipping, perves down in La-La Land. I’ve been a Raider since they started and my heart was broken when they left and I felt nothing but joy on their return. So to answer Sons-of-Blanda’s survey…..All of the above. Go Raiders and shut Poole the Fool up.
Monte Poole rhymes with.........
ANSWER: All of the above.
Thanks to you Sons,B.A. and John Will for the support. This blog is the core of Raider Nation in my opinion, and the diverse opinions on the Team and what we should or shouldn’t do makes both young and old think. The topics presented here ,along with blogger’s comments are far superior to those presented by Poole, Kawakami Corcoran and the like. keep up the good work, I’m f’in psyched for this season! R.F.F.R.
Absolutely! This is the best football blog I've seen,
and the best blog overall too. Many other blogs have no engagement what soever – it’s like a series of monologues competing for first prize in lame wit. This one is raw, real, rambunctious, rough and right!
by Spirals galore on Jun 25, 2010 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow thats a lot of R words.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 26, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
hey
go to MHR and comment there… u keep hanging around, even though u just said the sense of humor is better @ MHR…
and by the way, u sound like u got ur mouth impregnated by a donkey @ MHR….
I’M JUST SAYIN….
I'll Get Inside Your FACE!
by VaderBDCRaider on Jun 28, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Ah, internet tough guy huh?
I don’t ever come over to talk trash and if you don’t want to read my comments you don’t have to. Don’t be a jackass though man. I’M JUST SAYIN…. :P
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 28, 2010 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions
no.
not an internet tough guy, not an online gangster. just a raider fan that doesna like hearin badgering from a rivals fan…
and we’ll see after 10-10-10….
u dont get so lucky this year.
I'll Get Inside Your FACE!
by VaderBDCRaider on Jul 1, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
By the way Vader I'll be here all season.
We’ll see how much you’ll be talking after Oct, 10th.

Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 28, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions
choke choke choke choke CHARGERS
Always an asshole in every blog ,huh? Remember one "R’ word J.O. ……..Raiders
There's an R word you might want to learn as well
“Reply”. It’s a useful tool. Really it is.
Please don't read my signature.
by SoCalBoltFan on Jun 28, 2010 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions
SoCalChokeFan
I'll Get Inside Your FACE!
by VaderBDCRaider on Jul 1, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions

by 

























