Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Is The 1,000 Yard Rusher Still Important?




Some of the most legendary teams in NFL history usually have a running back or two that still serves as a prominent face of a franchise that transcended into a dynasty.



The Bears had men like Bronko Nagurski, Red Grange, George "One Play" McAfee, and Walter Payton lead them to championships. The Green Bay Packers had Johnny "Blood" McNally, Jim Taylor, and Paul Hornung help them to several championships. The Miami Dolphins had Larry Csonka and the Pittsburgh Steelers had Franco Harris. The Washington Redskins had Cliff Battles and John Riggins, and the Dallas Cowboys had Tony Dorsett and Emmitt Smith while the Cleveland Browns had Marion Motley and Jim Brown.



These teams have fielded some of the most dominant teams in league history, and each one of the running backs that helped them attain that level are members of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Legendary players who would put their teams on their backs and run through opponents to garner the trophy that symbolized champion. A lore left by these men have made the NFL billions of dollars and helped them infiltrate the fabric of so many homes and countries.



In 1989, Paul Tagliabue was named the commissioner of the league. He took over a league that was leaving its roots behind on their way to a new way the game would be played. Tagliabue was a basketball playing lawyer with no football experience, and he quickened the games changes to resemble a fast break in pads. His successor, Roger Goodell, took over in 2006 and has kept the ball rolling.



Gone is the game played in sporadic conditions in favor of a hospital clean environment to draw in corporate sponsorship to buy luxury seating. Gone are the blockers with folded arms akin to a chicken wing to where they can extend their arms and hold every play. Gone is a defense now castrated by several rules that make it virtually impossible to play the game.



It is the quarterbacks game now. The golden child of the NFL and the darling of the media. Fans have been easily programmed to accept these changes as progress, while historians of the game lament the loss of testosterone in favor of a casual fan friendly sell out job. As the quarterback rears back to throw unimpeded, defenders are told not to hit him too high, low, or hard. Putting all of ones weight on the quarterback is also not allowed anymore.



A defender, running full speed with a 320-pound blocker holding on and mauling him, must take these rules into consideration and try to pull up without ripping muscles as they reach the quarterback. With rules like this, teams are more apt to pass against teams that never play man to man or try bump and run pass coverage anymore. They choose to get picked apart in zone coverage while waiting for a mistake.



The running back has had no rules affect his position because it is too pure and the only way to tamper with it is to change the rules of the other players surrounding the position. This is what has happened, as only 14 teams had running backs gain over 1,000 yards in 2009. The two teams that represented the NFL in Super Bowl XLIV were pass happy squads led by Pro Bowl quarterbacks.



The New Orleans Saints won the game while getting just 1,447 rushing yards from Pierre Thomas and Mike Bell, while the losing Indianapolis Colts were led in rushing by Joseph Addai's 828 yards. This has been a recurring theme since 2002, where four teams won titles with running backs that failed to gain over 791 yards in a season. Two other Super Bowl winners since then had running backs that gained 1,081 and 1,009 respectively.



Gaining 1,000 yards in a season is not quite the achievement it used to be. In the current 16 game format, a running back only needs to average just 62.5 yards to reach the barrier. Hardly worthy of entry into the hallowed walls of Canton. If Goodell foolishly gets his greedy way of cutting training camps and extending the season to 18 games, a running back will only need to rumble for 55.6 yards a game to get over 1,000 yards.



Chris Johnson, of the Tennessee Titans, ran for 2006 yards in 2009. He is only the sixth man in professional football history to run for over 2,000 yards, but four other men achieved this in a 16 game season like Johnson did. Hall of Famer Eric Dickerson heads the list, gaining 131.6 yards per game in 1984 that is only the fourth best in league history.



O.J. Simpson ran for an astonishing 2,003 yards in 1973 on a Buffalo Bills team where opponents knew he was the only one getting the ball. He still gathered a record 143.1 yards per game. It is ten yards better than the next man on the list, fellow Hall of Famer Jim Brown of the 1963 Browns. A debate over comparisons of Simpson's and Dickerson's seasons is akin to the Babe Ruth and Roger Maris situation in 1961.



That year saw Maris break Ruth's 34-year old record of 60 home runs by one. He did it with a batting average 87 points less than Ruth's 1927 season in a year two expansion teams joined the league and the season was increased by eight games. Many baseball fans asked for an asterisk to be placed by Maris' record, to show the discrepancy in games played.



Many NFL fans clamored for the same thing when Dickerson passed Simpson with two more games played that was needed to achieve the record. No running back has yet surpassed or come close to 2003 yards in 14 games.



Other football purists noted blockers for Dickerson were allowed to extend their arms and hold each play, while Simpson played in an era where defenses could head slap, clothesline, and horse collar while blockers could only have their arms tucked in like chicken wings to try to block.



Other than the 1,635 yards that Corey Dillon gained for the 2004 champion New England Patriots, there has not been a Super Bowl winner since 1998 to have a running back average over a hundred yards per game. Terrell Davis led the Denver Broncos to victory that year, becoming one of the six men to get over 2,000 yards by eight yards.



The 2000 Baltimore Ravens had both Jamal Lewis and Priest Holmes carry the ball to a title. Lewis, who gained 1,364 yards that year, would run for 2,066 in his his only Pro Bowl year in 2003. Holmes, who chipped in 588 yards, moved to the Kansas City Chiefs in2001 and became a three time Pro Bowl star. After leading the league in rushing that year, he scored 48 touchdowns off of 3,035 yards the next two seasons before an injury halted his career in the eight game in 2004 after getting 892 yards.



Terrell Davis is the only 2,000 yard running back that got a ring in his magical season. In the top-20 rushing seasons in NFL history, only Davis won a championship. Two others on the list, Shaun Alexander and Jamal Anderson, led their teams to the title game but lost. These numbers were all achieved since 1998, showing the old formula of a solid ground game with ball control consuming the clock is no longer the way to win in the NFL.





Most teams now are going with the idea at least two running backs are needed to be effective to have a winning season. While six running backs had over 300 carries in 2009, Johnson's league best 358 carries places as only the 44th most in league history. While he averaged just over 22 carries a game, many experts theorize the day of the cow bell running back is coming to an end in an era of specialists.



While gaining 1,000 yards might not be the achievement it used to be, nor needed to win Super Bowls in the modern NFL, they still hold an important historic place. Men like Simpson, Barry Sanders, Earl Campbell, Curtis Martin, Dickerson, Thurman Thomas, and LaDanian Tomlinson are just a few of the most respected running backs in football history, none have won championships and only Thomas and Martin played in a championship game.



Get used to the Goodell game, which is pass oriented with frightened defenders walking on eggshells spooked at the thought of fines and suspensions from a tyrannical commissioner whose regime borderlines on a fascism. Less cold and mud with more points scored, just as the Tagliabue blueprint was drawn up and followed through diligently by his lackey. Get used to a game where the thousand yard warhorse has been put out to pasture.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

...........you didn't even mention a Raider player AT ALL in this one

You are a douchebag.

"We want to win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it, even my organization deserves it. You have to win and you have to win with a vision for the Super Bowl. That's our passion here." - Al Davis

by Ozraider on Jul 16, 2010 6:01 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

No, but I think he is asking a question to spark our opinons.

No it is not necessary. You just need a guy who can run, even if he only gets 600,800,999 yards a season. Two very service-able backs can equal what a super star RB gets. In truth, I want to see the passing game used more than the run. I actually think Henderson is better at pass blocking, so will Bruce Campbell excell in the pass blocking. This Raider team should be pass first. With the pass game, the complexity of the game can change in a blink of an eye, for a CB even in a flinch he can be beaten for a TD.
In the run game it takes steps, you may make the MLB lose a step but the safety is right there and Baam!! concussion and game over, 4th and out! I know ppl call this a run first team, well fuk that, the pass is better and more dangerous than the run will ever be. The run is neccessary to use but should only be used in 35% or 40% of the game. I hope Campbell can be ready to be a slinger. (plus our line isn’t that good for run blocking thats why McFadden struggles and so does Bush)

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on Jul 16, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh and btw, props if you really write this stuff, knowing about the old times of football is good to know;

On the otherhand if you copy paste this from another website or author, you suck!

The RaiderLaker

by JaggerJaw on Jul 16, 2010 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

my suspicion is cut and paste

other wise i would have thought that at least some attempt would be made to make the posts relevant to the blog being posted on.

Crazy Canton Cuts(and pastes)

"We want to win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it, even my organization deserves it. You have to win and you have to win with a vision for the Super Bowl. That's our passion here." - Al Davis

by Ozraider on Jul 17, 2010 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's quite obvious

he’s a Skins fan and just trolls on the other sites.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 18, 2010 4:03 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

He wrote it on Bleacher Report too.

A simple fanshot w/ a link would have been sufficient.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 18, 2010 4:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rest The D

I still think that Bush can be a 1,000 runner. If the D is not as solid as we want against the run then keep the other team off the field by running the ball when needed. Remember that Air Coryall could score a ton of points yet could not stop the other team. If they could have salted away a few games with the run would they have won more? Just asking.

by Mallard Davis on Jul 16, 2010 8:01 PM PDT reply actions  

A 1,000-yard rusher doesn’t mean anything anymore. Your feature back needs to be getting more than 1,000 yards unless you have a pair of pretty damn good backs.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 16, 2010 9:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I think the RBBC(running back by committee)

is the way to go now. Just having one back that can do it all is very risky, and multiple backs who can do a bit of everything is more ideal now. Not to mention they would cost less. And it’s still effective(the pats for example don’t have a feature back, yet the past 2 years they have been top 10, even top 5 I think, in rushing).

How many teams only have one feature back nowadays?

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

Down with Big Brother!

by patriotguy2 on Jul 16, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

it's not really as if its a decision for style, but out of necessity

you can’t count on one guy to take that many car crashes to the body week in and week out and expect them to be able to still perform every Sunday. There are very few Eddie George style robobacks, and even they have chinks in their armor.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 16, 2010 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

-1,000,000

Couldn’t disagree more. We need both of those 2 fuckers to jump on the horse and run. One of them has to show they want it. An established run game will rest our weary defense and keep the opposing defense honest. For a runner to get into a groove they need the ball 2o times a game on average. A committee will not get that job done and it has only worked one in Oakland with Bo and Marcus.

Win at all costs! Winning ugly is still winning! Remember the past and what got us to the top before. Jim Plunkett and winning ugly......enough said!

by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Jul 17, 2010 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

...

we run a RBBC. its a mcfadden and bush tandem. we CAN have a 1,000 yard rusher, but we don’t need one to be successful in running.

Almost all the top 10 teams in rushing last year run a committee. What I’m saying is is that teams don’t need a 1,000 yard rusher nowadays.

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

Down with Big Brother!

by patriotguy2 on Jul 18, 2010 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because it has become a pass dominant league with big play qbs and receiver corps

It’s also cyclical, and there will always be a need for hardcore rushers, and APs and Chris Johnsons, and hopefully MCF and Bush this year.

There will be lots of guys who get 1000 this year.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 16, 2010 11:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Drew Brees puts on a clinic. Tooootally reminds me of how Gannon used to distribute it and Charlie Garner was a monster

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 17, 2010 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

My Point Exactly

The run game can ice a game, so don’t throw it away. When you mention Garner, I think of a close KC game where Garner took it wide and scored and broke the back of the Chiefs.

by Mallard Davis on Jul 17, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Both sides are right in this argument.

Bush needs to be the starter but they need both McFadden to play a significant role in the offense including quick passes out of the backfield and in pass-protection. I still think Bush needs to get over 1000 yards as the semi-work horse but still have McFadden line up all over the field and spell him whenever he needs a blow. This team needs max productivity out of both players in order for this offense to be improved. It will help this defense as well.

If my mother put on a helmet and shoulder pads and a uniform that wasn't the same as the one I was wearing, I'd run over her if she was in my way. And I love my mother.

Bo Jackson

by TAW on Jul 18, 2010 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think at this point it

seems McFadden would be better at Receiver.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 18, 2010 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

and you'd be dead on right if he never learned to be more elusive and to get into the secondary

where he should be able to hit the home runs we expected from him. Hue will get him in space against someone who won’t be able to catch him from behind.

You can also use him in the dink a dunk west coast pass as a run game with threats like him. If he was half as good as Garner was, we’d be golden, and getting our money’s worth from DMC.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 22, 2010 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember that sweep right call from Gruden who knew Garner would run to paydirt

that’s amazing shit to watch in action. Can’t tell you how many stories Gruden had like that. He’s that good, and when he has guys like Gannon, Garner, and that version of the West Coast we ran, it was spectacular to watch. I’m expecting a little of that use of every weapon we have from Hue’s version of our offense this year.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 22, 2010 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

As the league gets smarter

Less teams are going to want to put too much wear and tear on one RB. Once a RB hits about 300 carries, he is usually absolute shit the next year. It’s just too much for a human body to take!

The Saints and Colts succeeded with 2-back rotations. There is no need to turn Pierre Thomas or Joseph Addai into Larry Johnson, if you have a Reggie Bush or Donald Brown to take the load off. Also, it is a good idea to use your secondary backs as a change of pace, to get the defense out of their rhythm.

Also consider this: Larry Csonka, Jim Brown, Bronko Nagurski, these guys were all 6’2" or taller. Big strong dudes. The typical RB these days looks like Emmitt Smith- a shade below 6 feet, more fast than strong. AP is a notable exception, but 5’10" is a common height for a RB these days. That frame simply cannot take the sort of punishment that defenses can dole out, especially since the old-school RB did not have to face many 300 pounders on the D-line. In today’s game, every player is an athletic freak, and 280 pounds is considered undersized. Today’s RB is built to run around and away from today’s defender rather than run through him.

All these factors- success of two-back systems, the development of the modern game and the size and strength of modern players combine to make a single-back system obsolete and thus fewer 1000-yard rushers emerge.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Jul 18, 2010 10:40 AM PDT reply actions  

With those new tackles and fullback

our run game should improve.

We’ll truly have a more balanced attack with our new QB’s consistency.

by xville on Jul 18, 2010 8:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Oooohhh Yeaaaahhh. :)

I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!

Down with Big Brother!

by patriotguy2 on Jul 20, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I love Tonga, but he's no natural I-form lead blocking FB

I hope he works out. I was looking at him since we were discussing the draft long ago. I think the run game will only get better too, but still think we must upgrade the tackle spot.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 22, 2010 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have not checked yet...

I know we may not win the Super bowl this year (you never know) but can anyone tell my the last time a team won the super bowl without a 1000 yard rusher that was not a pass first team or a super dominant defensive team. the reason is i dont believe were a pass first team or a super dominant defense. also not including mid season injuries. probably never. we might get there defensively and might not need one but it couldnt hurt. If either running back can get 800 yards rushing and a butt load of passing yards that would be cool with me.

2009 Steelers Rashard Mendenhall 1108 yards
2008 Giants Jacobs and Ward 1089 1025 yards (what we need in bush and mc)
2006 Steeler Willie Parker 1494

by 22goose on Jul 18, 2010 10:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Today's 1,000 Yards

A 1,000 yard rusher was more of a factor in a 14 game season. A RB could average 65 yards a game and get 1040 yards in a 16 game season. 65 yards a game would put a team at the bottom of the rushing yards per game average, right? Rushing twenty times per game would give a RB 320 carries in a 16 game season. So, is the two back offense the answer?

by Mallard Davis on Jul 21, 2010 7:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes it is.

Especially on this team since Bush looks like the work horse who should get in the game late with a tired defense and McFadden should be getting involved in more snaps including the passing game as well.

If my mother put on a helmet and shoulder pads and a uniform that wasn't the same as the one I was wearing, I'd run over her if she was in my way. And I love my mother.

Bo Jackson

by TAW on Jul 21, 2010 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

McFadden should not be handed the ball at all. He MUST be tossed the ball in some sort. Either in a pass, toss, swing pass or screen. No handing off to him.

The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.

by JaKe. on Jul 22, 2010 5:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

we should just toss him

and call it a day.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 22, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I see what you did there. Very clever. I agree. Haha

The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.

by JaKe. on Jul 22, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't want to draft him

and I like him even less now. I think he’s an underachiever, and it’s not because he’s in Oakland or our O-line or bla bla bla. It’s because he’s not trying to correct his dropping issues, injury issues, and staying upright issues.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 22, 2010 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I say trade him now while we can still salvage something for him. Maybe a 3rd Rd. pick if we’re lucky.

The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.

by JaKe. on Jul 22, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree with you both about Darren. This year will be the proof

but go back and watch Darren run and I challenge you to not be enamored by the good things you see. Granted, the bad is horrible, but Fargas looked pretty horrible in his freshman and sophomore years, too, and he ran pretty well for us ultimately, on shitty offensive ball teams to boot.

I think Darren proves doubter wrong this year with a sold performance, coming out of the year with respect from the league.

I agree with you Jake that he should be mostly tossed or passed to, but the old school Lombardi style sweeps are a thing of beauty with any back, but the magic happens in the blocking.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 27, 2010 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

By now, he should be waiting for and finding holes. He should be able to stay upright. He should be able to hold on to the ball. McFadden has not fixed any of these issues yet. And despite that, he can’t stay healthy. Again, it falls back on what the guy is willing to work on. He was a dropper in college too, and I think hurt his junior and senior years of college, or at least senior. So I think it’s time to cut our losses while we can still get something for him.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 28, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

and I don’t think he’s gonna prove me wrong, just like Russell didn’t. If he’s not going to try to work on these problems, and all signs point that he’s not or there would be some improvement, then he’ll never get better.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 28, 2010 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do agree for what we spent on him he should have already been able to do all those things at this level

but can’t forget what I did see. My point is he needed not only coaching, but a coordinator who will harness the talent and explosiveness he has and attack the defense with it, and I’m just saying I want to see what we’ll see with Hue Jackson in place, a legit qb in place, and all wr options healthy and ready to go: I believe we will both see it.

I believe its been expressed that they plan on keeping DMC (though it doesn’t mean squat really). I remember in Cable’s media addresses they said he and DHB were turning heads, and he was working on the balance thing. I’m all about our guys being about hard work, and haven’t really observed a lack of willingness in Darren yet, so I’m reserving judgment until at least game 2.

I think it’s pretty safe to say Darren isn’t sippin on the sizzurp, too.

"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew

by brhynno on Jul 29, 2010 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't say he's not trying for the team

or not showing up for meetings and such. I’m saying it looks as if he’s not trying to fix his flaws. And I’m not sold on Jackson just yet and refuse to get onboard his wagon until I see results. His OC history is very lacking and as other Offensive coaching positions he hasn’t had a winning season. I know I may be sounding like I’m trying to rain on a parade, but I’m trying to keep real here. But I’ve stated frequently my concerns w/ McFadden, and I still have these concerns with him. I haven’t seen anything show me that he’s trying to get better at holding on to the ball or stay upright. And we had a rough runner with Fargas to help him for a while. So I dunno. I’m for trading him while he still has value. 3rd rounder maybe.

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 29, 2010 4:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Running

You can win a game throwing it, but you control it through running.

by My beloved raiders on Jul 27, 2010 1:24 PM PDT reply actions  

indeed

eat up that clock

Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!

by mikesd1981 on Jul 28, 2010 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Raiders_wallpaper_by_sircle_small
Raiders Release Routt
Small
CONFIRMED: Oakland Raider Cornerback Stanford Routt Gets Released
Small
Formula for Ranking Franchises All-Time?
Dscf1428_small
Breaking News! Raiders Retain Al Saunders! A great decision!
Oakland-raiders-logo_small
My take on the defense this offseason
Small
Saunders staying with Raiders
Small
As the Raiders move back to zone blocking, McFadden must be traded
1963raiderpatriots-ticket_small
Obscurity Dominates Raiders Coaching Hires
A-clockwork-orange-alex_small
CB Asa Jackson, Cal Poly
Raidersafllogo_small
S Markelle Martin

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50