One Victory Down 22 More To Go
Before I start this post-game recap/thread, I have to admit that I wasn't able to watch the game. It was not on TV in my hood. I will be watching tomorrow at 3:30 when the NFL Network replays the game, but we need a post-game thread up in here. Fill me in nation, what did your eyes see that mine didn't have the chance to?
Now that I think about it, I am not sure my biggest questions will be answered by watching the broadcast. it is time for televised football to take a step forward. For us die-hards, who would like to re-watch a game or check out things from different angles, they should offer different views on-line. NASCAR offers this feature and it seems like one of those no-brainer things you can't believe they didn't think of sooner.
For example, I would like to see a camera that just show the Raiders O-line all game. I am really curious how the rookie O-lineman looked. I read that Veldheer got time at Center. Did he play tackle at all? It sounded like he was solid. I am also curious as to how Bruce Campbell looked.
A couple of things noticeable from the stat sheet:
The Raiders D-line dominated. Welcome to the NFL LaMarr. This game should be easy for him. ROY should be his when he ends up with 32 sacks on the year. Besides the sacks, the Raiders were stout against the run. I'll take it. Of course one of the big question marks coming in for the Cowboys was the play of their O-line.
The Cowboys defense is not a question mark and the Raiders first team O found little success. They were horrid on 3rd downs and the first team didn't even come close to coming close to scoring position.
I'd be a little more worried about this if the Raiders O is not a giant work in progress and Cincinatti didn't find any success against the 'Boys either. They failed to move the ball past the 50 in the first half.
DHB was targeted on the first pass and then not again. I don't know if this was a function of him not getting open or the offense going some place else. Whatever the case is, it worries me a little.
So, what did y'all see from Texas. How were the rooks? How was the play calling? Who stood out, positive or negative?
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1 pre-season game isn't nearly a large enough sample size to make a judgment on the state of the raiders offense for the 2010 season
Of course not. It was only 1 quarter, but we are impatient and quick to judgement.
Life's a garden...dig it!
by Rich Langford on Aug 13, 2010 1:06 AM PDT up reply actions
To answer your question:
Henry Rollins wouldn’t make such an obvious statement, but he would probably beat the living hell out of you for doing so. And then he’d sing about it… only he wouldn’t really sing, it’d be more like talking set to music. Then he would take Dorothy Mantooth out for a nice seafood dinner and never call her again. After that, he would join the Danzig Era Misfits up on stage for a semi-coherent performance of “We Are 138,” resulting in 5 deaths, 2 serious injuries, and one pregnancy. Finally, he’d go home, make himself some chamomile tea, and fall asleep watching “Mary Tyler Moore” reruns. The next day, he would go for a jog. That’s what Henry Rollins would do.
"I came back with an I-Don't-Care attitude. If I had an open shot, I was taking it."
--The Robert Horry
I bleed Purple N' Gold and Silver N' Black... because of this rare condition, I am no longer allowed to donate to the Red Cross.
by The_Power_and_the_Glory_of_Robert_Horry on Aug 13, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
This response is the best thing to come out of the preseason yet.
Life's a garden...dig it!
by Rich Langford on Aug 13, 2010 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
The weak links from tonight were Satele (C) and Cooper Carlisle (RG). Walker kinda sucked (false start)but his back up is Barnes, so he stays.
Bears game will tell me more, if these two keep sucking, it means it’s not the rust, but it’s just that they suck. If possible Veldheer should start at C, I liked how he looked smooth there (but vs. second stringers). Campbell looked good, overall he is stronger than Cooper whom looked shakey.
Starting average/decent O-line should be this:
Henderson, Gallery, Veldheer, Campbell, Walker
The starting O-line of today looked average/below average, with Satele and Coop starting.
just to throw dirt, Satele was thrown to the ground like a girl and he enabled the one and only sack of Campbell, as Cooper on that same play lost his man also which would’ve been a sack.
Defense = Awesome.
DHB no cathes = question mark still.
Hope to see better WR play when Chaz back as well as J Ford for Bears game. D-mac too.
The RaiderLaker
by JaggerJaw on Aug 13, 2010 1:29 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
after watching this game
i went back and watched last years game against dallas and it was the exact. same. thing. w/ satele. every play ratliff was puttin dick to ass against sampson.
im willin to give him one more game. this next game is against a 4-3 defense then after that we have a 3-4 and a 4-3 again. for the final two games let veldheer have a crack w/ the starting group and whomever plays better let em have it at tennessee.
by frank7da2tank on Aug 13, 2010 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Agree with this assessment of our O-Line. Your D assessment needs some refinement. No question about our Front Four
“Awesome” works for me. However, Branch played poorly and Chris Johnson played as he always does – some bad some good. Our back-up LBs were tough against the run but, in general, a good team can throw against our LBs (1st & 2nd team).
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Sons, the fact that the Boys' starting RB never broke off a big run, even a small run was awesome.
But it was only for 1 quarter, the winded effect did not take place for when the offence sucks like in the reg. season, which will change this season hopefully… But yes, during some passing CJ got burned as well as Huff, or Branch. Good D-line, some blown coverage assignments by DB’s.
The RaiderLaker
Hard to tell...
Both QB’s struggled, were off target, and although Boller ended up with decent numbers, there were plenty of ‘drives’ that he looked craptastic. There will be improvement, but how much?
The OL looked okay, did better run blocking than pass blocking. Satele and Carlisle didn’t look any better than last year, and RT wasn’t exactly a high point. Veldheer and Campbell looked okay in their playing time, but neither really showed that much; it is obvious that they are still not even close to being ready to make a move towards starting, probably next year, although Campbell could see some time late.
The WR’s still aren’t showing much. As much as was said about DHB before, I’d say that they didn’t go back to him because they don’t want to show their hand early. At least that’s what I’d like to believe, but I need to see him do something before I feel better about him. The others were okay, but nothing special.
The defense, especially the front seven, looked much improved. Defense is usually ahead of offense at this point, so let’s not try to read too much into it, but there are good signs so far.
Preseason, so the ‘meaning’ of this game is limited. Last year we beat the Cowboys in preseason, too, and got punked when it counted…
Failure builds character; success reveals it
Well, it's a no-brainer that J. Campbell is rusty and it's yet again a new system for him, as well as a new team.
He will improve, he looked nervous, plus DHB and Murphy struggled.
The RaiderLaker
The defense was incredible
Someone no one talks about constantly had pressure up the middle, John Henderson. McClain and Scott looked great and I think our run defense as a whole is good.
Bruce Campbell and Jared V did well, there better than Cooper and Barnes IMO
JC was accurate and solid, he said after the game they barely went into the playbook this game, kept it simple so no worries. I wanna see DHB and Chaz though.
Bennett vs Cartwright will be intense
Nick Miller is still the ish
Our O line needs help at center. If that is Jared wonderful. Iono if he is though, maybe start a massive Oline with Langston, Gallery, Jared, Bruce, and Mario.
Thomas Howard also was solid but quiet, everyone on defense I like. They were spectacular
No Brennan?
Overall I feel great tonight after this
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
The way I look at it. We get our first W in Dallas. And We’ll get our last W in Dallas. Yeah, baby!
Passing: Eh. Not great. I’m glad Jason found Zach as much as he did. That’s a plus. It looks like our WR’s need to work on the routs a bit better. Didn’t really get to see much seeing it was for only 1 quarter and the 1st game, but, it was much better than last year.
Rushing: Bush had a few decents runs. Still looks winded after a few runs though. Probably just rusty though. Michael Bennet his beast mode today. But like RRS said, it was against the backups of the backups of the backups. I’m still pulling for Rock. Who looked huge by the way! My dad compared him to a tank.
Blocking: Very dismal. Satele got destroyed. Too many penalties. But once again, I’m going to place this blame on it being the 1st game. I liked what I saw from Veldheer as well. As for Campbell, still undecided.
Defense: Wow. Man, our D was fucking terrific. And to everyone who said 11 sacks was ridiculous for LaMarr…Suck it!! How does 2 in one quarter against one of the better O-lines sound, huh? Shaughnessy was a beast. And I give my sincerest apology to him when I said he should be traded. My bad. Haha.
Not sure on how McClain did. I saw he got beat by Witten for 13 yds on the 2nd play. Had to see that one coming. It sucks when we have a LB with pass coverage issues and a S who also needs help on that. I hope that gets better. Trevor Scott is an animal and certainly showed why he can get 10+ sacks.
Tommy Kelly and Richard Seymour actually did quite well. I would’ve liked to see a lil’ more pressure, but it was decent. Kelly didn’t suck. So that’s a plus. I didn’t see John much. But, I’m sure his presense was felt. Dez Bryant got noticably bigger! I like it!
Mike Mitchell actually had a good game. I’m glad. Although it looked like he was shooting for the leg wraps ups more than a hard hit. Nothing wrong with that. Just sayin’… Nnamdi is still a complete and utter badass. CJ showed he’ll always be a good # 2. Nothing more. Walter McFadden actually disapointed me today..But, Boyd and Ware sure showed alot. Routt, well, he was average. Got juked by Barber. And the one play to where his guy didn’t catch the ball, was cause of a bad pass. Aka, he’s still shit.
Swayze Walters didn’t live up to his badass name at all. Cut him. Lechler still has the leg of a greek god. Jano saves the saves the day as always. And besides the one big punt return, I liked our special teams tackling..
One more thing, Dallas’ kicker is a douche. Don’t you think you’d like to see if your Special Teams can even tackle? Or is he convinced he can kick it out on literally every play. I bet he does that in pracitice too. Oh, and why the hell was he wearing gloves? Was it cold in a closed stadium in Dallas, Texas during August? I just don’t like him.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
Like this write-up, Jake - your head was really in the game.
yes, DeathRo and Tyvon can be thrown on, along with Routt, CJ and Lil Walter – all good tacklers/hitters but not great vs. pass coverage. Teams will wise up early and game plan to throw against these guys – they won’t be able to run much against our awesome DL. Waters looked like a male ballerina – I don’t believe he’s Raider material at all – free up a roster spot and cut his ass.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 7:20 AM PDT up reply actions
in the words of peter griffin
dont get too penisey…
watching that game (oh btw i was able to stream it live here: http://www.justin.tv/sportscasthq63# ) brought my thoughts about this team back down to earth.
im still looking to j campbell to continue his steady improvement year in and year out, however, i think the ground game even though it didnt do all that swell will be the base of our offense. i really liked houston and bennett, but thats all i really liked
I was happy
JC was able to actually complete some passes——against a VERY stout defense. All in all, the 1st team offense looked pretty sharp IMO, it can only get better when we get our broken players back.
The 1st team defense looks to me like it will dominate the AFC West, Ol’ Rivers is in for a treat.
Refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death
pre season
typically, Ds are way ahead than Offences because of obvious – timing, new schemes, rust more pronounce, etc. JC had composure as a new qb facing the cowboys Ds; aired it out a couple of times; he’ll get there. We do have a WR issue, particularly if JC loses faith in DHB quickly in a game. Watch that space. OL needs to get addressed; tired of repeating myself.
Lamar Houston was a beast with his 2 sacks
I really liked our defense, our OL wasn’t up to par though, we need to have a stronger showing next time.
Chris Johnson
Is terrible. He gave up plays right off the bat! He needs to go .. But I’m not quite comfortable with who we have behind him. Routt is horrible as well. They’re the two biggest issues at defense. Other than that .. I really liked what I saw in the defense ..
Hardcore Raiders Fans are 5150 .. (iBleedSilverNBlack)
by RaiderCreator5150 on Aug 13, 2010 6:17 AM PDT reply actions
He needs to go? What? He had a bad day against a really good WR. I’m pretty sure he’s not #1, so no worries there. I think you should calm down and take some breaths. It’s only preseason.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
We’ll see .. I have a feeling it goes into the regular season as well. He’s my biggest concern on defense .. It may be preseason, but that’s definately not what you want to see ..
Hardcore Raiders Fans are 5150 .. (iBleedSilverNBlack)
by RaiderCreator5150 on Aug 13, 2010 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions
he was facing a pro bowl WR. What do you expect a #2 to do?
Also, watching highlights, that was a difficult catch to make, and Chris was pretty close to him too.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
You’re going to get beat on the quick slant. It’s almost indefensible without jumping the route early which will result in any decent QB not making the throw at all. What’s inexcusable is losing track of both the reciever and the ball and letting a completion take place behind you.
by TexasRaider20 on Aug 13, 2010 6:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Long time listener, first time caller.
There was good and bad…obviously. Genius, right?
I was disappointed in Campbell. I’ve always like him, even prior to his Raider days. I was happy to see him come to Oakland, but I thought he could be held responsible for effectively killing 3 drives. He has a strong arm. He needs to use it on the curls, hitches, and comeback routes. A little more mustard on a couple of passes could have sustained the drives. Then there was the deep ball to Murphy (I believe). The defender was beat. Put the ball downfield and the receiver run under it. You don’t have to finese it within 6 inches of the sideline.
That’s ok. Time, chemisty, and confidence will come.
Receiver need to come get the ball, not wait for it to come to you. Attack the ball. It’s yours. Take it.
First team D was solid. I was pretty happy with the pass rush. I think 4 sacks against the first team O-line. Two coverage sacks, two that just got there. That’s good. Pass rush is going to have to be good if they’re going to play man D almost exclusively in the secondary. Johnson got taken a couple of times early. Going to happen occasionally when matched up against the #1, but not the end of the world if you can keep the play in front of you.
Dallas drove the ball fairly well, but the D was huge in the red zone. I can live with bend but don’t break. If we can predominately limit teams to FGs, we will be in contention to win every game.
My thoughts
Offense:
-Mario Henderson was just what he hope he will be: invisible. When you don’t hear your left tackle’s name called, that’s a good thing because it means he wasn’t allowing sacks or taking penalties.
-Samson Satele and Cooper Carlisle…ugh. They nearly got Campbell killed on that sack they allowed. I’ll be watching them closely in upcoming games. The team has some options regarding center, but if Carlisle continues to struggle, Cable’s gonna have to put aside his man love for Cooper and scan the waiver wire for a good option or hope Bruce Campbell’s ready sooner than anyone thinks. The right guard will be the Achilles Heel of this line the whole season.
-Langston Walker had that false start, but hey, only one false start a game from our right tackle? Still an upgrade from Cornbread.
-Veldheer and Bruce Campbell looked ugly at first, but once the jitters died they pretty much manhandled the Dallas scrubs. Which of course means squat, but it’s nice to confirm they can at least handle the 2nd and 3rd teams.
-Veldheer looked mighty good at center, considering he’d never played it in a real game before. If Satele keeps playing sub-par football, they may want to look at it as a real option and not just a camp experiment.
-If he has another couple performances like he did last night, Michael Bennett is going to really cause Cable and Al to make a tough decision. Right now, Cartwright has the edge to make the team because he’s clearly penciled in at kick returner. But if Bennett proves himself to be a real threat as 3rd RB and possible 2nd RB (after all, DMac is DMac and thus injury prone), then it might behoove them to find a kick returner elsewhere and keep Bennett on the team. That’ll be an interesting battle to watch unfold.
-Anyone panicking over the offense after one pre-season game, please throw yourself off a cliff at the first opportunity. New offensive system, new play caller, new quarterback, first live game in 8 months, some cruicial offensive weapons missing (McFadden, Schilens)…..what were you expecting?
Defense:
-That defensive line looked like it could be something special. I think Dallas’ tackles didn’t really take Shaughnessy and Houston seriously and got caught napping when it turned out they can play. Extremely encouraging for me to see was how active and energetic Tommy Kelly looked with Richard Seymour next to him. This is exactly what I was hoping for and why I was so excited when I heard they were moving him inside.
-RoMac didn’t get a chance to make very many plays, but I tell ya, I was loving watching him barking out orders and getting the defense lined up correctly and on time. There was none of that last second scramble to get into position like you’d see with Morrisson running things the past few years.
-He played one series, but in that one series, Nnamdi Asomugha showed why he is the best. He read Roy Williams like a pulp novel. He idenitifed the route and ran it better than Williams did.
-Desmond Bryant flashed nice speed and strength. He was a hell of a bargain as an undrafted free agent and I think you’ll see him as starting 3-tech when Kelly’s contract runs out or he gets cut.
-Stanford Routt didn’t look horrible, so that’s a net plus!
-The rookie corners did look horrible, but they were 5th round and 7th round draft picks, so…..yeah. Wouldn’t panic about that.
-Chris Johnson showed why he’s one of the most maddening players on the team: inconsistency. Sometimes he plays beautiful man coverage, draped over his receiver like a blanket and swatting passes away. Other times, he’s out to lunch, wandering around the field 15 yards from his man.
-SWARM TACKLING ON RUN DEFENSE. I was giddy to see it. About damn time.
"'Tis a bird I love, with its brooding note, And the trembling throb in its mottled throat; There's a human look in its swelling breast, And the gentle curve of its lowly crest; And I often stop with the fear I feel-- He runs so close to the rapid wheel." Nathaniel Parker Willis, "The Belfrey Pigeon"
by Raybin on Aug 13, 2010 6:58 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Superb synsopsis! You might have mentioned our SS play and LB pass defense which were both alarming.
And yes, by all means, something must be done about the C & RG. We face more 3-4s than 4-3s and Satelle is too small to handle NTs – he got worked bad. Carlisle has slowed considerably and is a liability – especially in passing downs – I didn’t get a good read on Souperman but wouldn’t mind playing him next week early against the Bears. You are spot-on re CJ – he is scary inconsistent and the help I’d hoped for in Walter MacFadden, based on last night, isn’t going to materialize (at least, for quite a while)
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Rec'd
I agree with all of this. Bravo.
One thing you missed, Mike Mitchell played surprisingly well, at leas to me.
"The A's have to be setting some record this year for simultaneously maximizing team quality and player anonymity. I guess that’s sort of their thing though." - Luke in MN
Greened
Also about Cartwright, if Bennet still plays better they can cut him and have Ford or a rookie DB return kicks or Nick Miller
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
Game on
Satele was bad, They just need to go ahead and give center to Veldheer. I garauntee he wont get pushed around like a woman like Satele did. Langston 2 offsides calls but thats always been his problem. Campbell said in an interview during the game that they just ran a few vanilla plays, because they were missing so many people and didnt want anymore injuries. The offense didnt look great but it didnt look terrible either.
The Defense on the other hand looked beastly. The D-line was in their face the entire game wow. Lamarr Houston is going to set the rookie record for sacks. No way Right tackles are going to be able to solo block him. Steal of the draft and rookie of the year.Defense is looking top ten.
Our DEs are wonderful, I get choked up watching them and pondering just how awesome LaMarr and Matt really are.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions
TV
I had the same problem watching the game, as it was not in my area. However, I stumbled across that NFL.com is streaming the preseason games for $39. It might seem like a lot for preseason, but I got it. It was great to see the team VS listening to the team I can only hope the NFL will do this for regular season games as well!
The team looked great. The offense did move forward, and the ball was on target. JC should have been closer to 10 out of 12 as for some obivous drops. And we saw the
rebirth of the vertical passing game. The backs really ran well. Would have 20-9 if we
didn’t miss the field goal.
Dallas has a great O and we stopped them, and their backs. Which says alot for the new improved defense. Hats off to Lamar, he really went after them the whole game.
Our 2nd and the 3rd string teams really outplayed the cowboys. The most important was playing to WIN the game. this is definitely a Raider REBOOT!
by Christopher Cognetta on Aug 13, 2010 7:44 AM PDT reply actions
TV
I live in Phoenix and I found a free site to use. Channelsurfing.net. Just scroll down to the NFL games, and click onto the one you want to watch. Last night I had the choice of 3-4 different broadcasts of the game. At least one form LA, OAK, and DAL. I could not stand listening to the one from DAL. Those guys were horrible and hard to listen too. Not as clear spoken as our OAK Raider broadcasting team.
"Cuz I'm a Raider, Oakland Raider, From the bay, to LA, to Las Vegas!" -Luniz
Bottom line, it was an exhibition game.
It was also the first game of the season for the Raiders, you cannot make absolute decisions on anyone’s play. At the end of the day, Campbell was sacked once, Boller not at all, so that is a positive. To point to one play where Satele and Carlisle were both beaten and to then say they played terribly is a little bit of an exaggeration. There were several plays where Campbell had plenty of time to throw so the same two guys must have been doing a pretty good job of protecting. To proclaim yourself worried about DHB because two passes were thrown to him, and both were deflected by the defensive backs is a little strange.
It seemed clear to me at least that the Raiders were trying to see who the back up receivers are going to be, Higgins, Figurs, Miller, or Holland.
From my observation it appeared the DL and LB’s were protecting the gaps which has been the focus this year. They did an excellent job of that. They put very good pressure on the QB which was a welcome sight.
But when it is all said and done, no one was injured, overall the play was solid, and when the season starts no body will remember one way or the other what happened in Dallas last night. More importantly, some rookies and very young players got a chance to get a taste of playing an opponent, that is invaluable. There is now tape to see what mistakes they made and what good things they did.
To be honest, this preseason game seemed a little more impressive than last year's against Dallas.
The main thing I wanted to see was how our 1st team defense played against them since they have 1 of the best offenses in the league. Our team held their own. There are some things that stood out.
Henderson and Walker aren’t the long-term answers at either tackle position. When the D blitzed they loaded up on Mario’s side and Jason had to hurry his throws. Also Walker had trouble with faster LBs and I don’t think that will change when the regular season starts. The interior line didn’t really blow them of the line and open up alot of big holes to run through however when you’re running against a D-line with Jay Ratliff and Igor Olshansky that is understandable. Also it seemed as if they weren’t sure if they were running zone or power blocking plays in certain points of the 1st half. I will give them the benefit of the doubt since it is the 1st preseason game.
As for the D-line they really held up well. I don’t think the pressure was as great as I had hoped and am hoping they are just saving alot of the zone-blitz and stunts for the regular season to not show too much to the competition. Even though Lamar Houston got a couple of sacks because of his bull-rushing tenacity, both can also be attributed to good coverage and Romo held the ball too long. The most pressure came when Trevor Scott came around the corner and stripped the ball against the 1st team O-line. The run defense which I was really checking was very solid and McClain held his own even though his name wasn’t called often. I was particularly impressed on a reverse to Miles Austin that Huff and the rest of the backers smelled and held to only 3 yards when in the past Morrison and company would easily allow about 10 more yards at least.
The receivers overall for Oakland for the most part did not play very well and alot can be attributed to the O-line not giving Jason ample time to read the coverages. Heyward Bey was a non-factor and Louis Murphy played adequate and thought it was not at all his fault got hung out to dry by Jason on one play. I did like the screen plays as all got some decent yardage and am hoping the running backs are featured much more in this area when the regular season starts.
The defensive backs were ok. I think the coaching philosophy is what needs to be fixed however. Romo looked Austin’s way about 3 times and 2 were completions for 33 yards against Johnson. Johnson made a good play later on the ball against the 2nd team receivers later though. Routt was well Routt getting juked out of a play by Marion Barber on a run so time will tell if he is the same old dime back playing nickle. Nnamdi made a good play on the ball and Roy Williams saved a possible pick-6. The starting safeties didn’t do much as Witten got open in front of Tyvon rather seemlessly. They did play well in run support though as no big gains on run or screens were made.
The QBs looked ok and was particularly more impressed with Jason than Kyle who seemed to play alot longer than anyone wanted. Jason made a couple of bad throws to Murphy but you may say pressure had alot to do with that. He at least looks like a starting NFL stepping up in the pocket and feeling the rush.
The coaching staff once again frustrated me with the way they continue to use Nnamdi by keeping on one side of the field no matter who is in front of him. Johnson can be a good #2 corner but if they repeatedly play man to man and allow him to match up against the other team’s #1 receiver this D will continue to give up big plays. I think Nnamdi needs to be used much like Deion in the past where he would follow the other team’s best receiver and check him no matter where he is. This would include if they are lined up in the slot as it can open up alot of possibilities for him to come of the edge and blitz as well. Overall last night I gave it a C- even though many may disagree however I am much more impressed with this year’s 1st team D against Dallas than last year’s which was pretty much soft against the Dallas 1st team and allowed an easy TD from Romo to Witten after the O-line allowed him all the time in the world to find his man. If you have read this the whole way through I am impressed whether or not you agree with my assessment.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
Nothing you wrote do I disagree with
except to point out it was the first exhibition game, and everything was essentially vanilla, offense and defense. I am not a fan of Walker as a starting tackle either, but what can be done about that.
I felt Campbell had enough time with one exception. Please, let’s not forget that Dallas is noted for its defense, and is a Super Bowl caliber team. The game was in Dallas, the team was fired up. The Raiders traveled there on Wed. So overall, not a bad effort.
decent assessment TAW
shit offensive line will be our anchor all year.
although i like mclain, i think we should have drafted the next best o-lineman and kept morrison.
2 sacks is 2 sacks, Lamarr! Front four was very solid in general.
Miles Austin kills us…
why doesnt nnamdi follow the other teams #1? i assume there is a reason for that????
by rat, el rat, mr. rat, the rat on Aug 13, 2010 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Cowboys #1 was Roy WIlliams.
Either that, or Roy was the better match up, because putting roy williams on Chris Johnson, is setting Johnson up to get burned a lot ore often.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 13, 2010 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions
You can stream NFL preseasons games on your computer for free.
If you want to watch the raiders play and it’s not on in your hood. Simple go to atdhe.net.
Once you go to the site, go to sports, there will be listing of all preseason game played that day. when it’s time for the game press the link, but not before game time. Streams pretty good with no downloads or other bullshit.
No more excuses for not watching the game.
P.S. you all can thank me later. been watching preseason game on this site for the last 3 years.
I thank you!
I usually use channelsurfing or justin.tv Streaming’s okay.
I’ll try it out though. :)
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 13, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
More than one site
To choose from I guess! That is good to know if one site goes down, or is not working right.
The one I use again is www.channelsurfing.net.
"Cuz I'm a Raider, Oakland Raider, From the bay, to LA, to Las Vegas!" -Luniz
the stream for the raiders game was not well for channelsurfing over in my area.
sometimes just googling “raiders cowboys 2010 pre-season live stream” just works too.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
you can also watch the games on www.sports2stream.com or vipstand.net i use vipstand.net but both work really well
Great defensive play, first preseason game and the Raiders as most teams still have work to get their Offense in sync....
TO would have been a great addition as I mentioned before, however, WR is a position we should look at improving…The Raiders are a better team, the Defensive play shows that, look for the Raiders to improve on Offense as every game continues. I am in California on a contract and I will be at every Raider game until I leave. I am really excited about that…lol Go Raiders!!!!
by Rodney Sacramento on Aug 13, 2010 4:55 PM PDT reply actions
Rodney Sac, who would have thought so many of us would be walking around dumbfounded that we weren't deep enough
at WR. Nick Miller and Ford are going to have to show up b/c Chaz is going to be sporadically playing and DHB (our #1 receiver) has not secured even half the Nation’s confidence. What are the chances of our getting Vince Jackson and what would he cost us?
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Chaz' the glass man.
Seriously i dont think he can be counted on to be number 1 WR.
That post phoo of Janikowski is a masterpiece. Should get a pulitzer or whatever they give photographers
Sebastian is worth every nickel we’re paying him – he is just brilliant, a player whose SO essentially Raider – excellent, poised, confident, unique, natural. With our defense and Janikowski we’ll win games this season just like Al like – by narrow margins.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
... and if our Offense gets it together, we'll win by double digits.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 13, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions
It is a great photo
I stare at and I feel sorry for that ball. That is power encapsulated right there. The pic also represents the greates kicking combo the league has ever seen. What a uniquely great draft class they represent.
Life's a garden...dig it!
by Rich Langford on Aug 13, 2010 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions
it was the 1st game together and only 1 quarter. kyle looked great too. but our D, is a beast
by sports with steve on Aug 14, 2010 1:44 PM PDT reply actions
"D, is a beast" ... yes, they played as one
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 14, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Not to be a downer, BUT...
Before I start creaming my jeans about Houston like some others here, something to think about:
He had two sacks in the first series, great! But, he played most of the game, what happened after that? Either they adjusted, and pretty much shut him out/down, or he coasted, not even getting anything against the second team. Neither choice makes me all that happy.
Am I saying that he isn’t going to be any good? Nope.
Am I saying that he sucks, or something equally stupid? Nope.
What I AM saying is that one game doesn’t mean much, especially in the preseason. Before we get too carried away, let’s see what else happens. It was good to get a win, but it isn’t exactly like the team shone, we didn’t even score until the last five minutes of the game…
Don’t get too high, don’t get too low.
Failure builds character; success reveals it

by 




























