Raiders O-Line: Nation, I Declare We Relax
One of the big concerns facing the Raiders after our victory over the Cowboys in the Raiders preseason debut was the O-Line. The big question mark of the whole offseason (aside from the over/under on how many days it would be before Russell got canned).
So in the debut we saw one play in particular that was especially discouraging. The play where the entire right side of the O-Line from C to RT was bowled over, leading to a nasty sack on Campbell. Luckily Campbell was fine and we all could take our collective sighs of relief and frustration.
Immediately message boards and blogs ignited in fury over the atrocity that just occurred. And they were further emblazoned when Veldheer and Campbell came in and looked amazing. Many Raiders fans after the game were calling for Campbell and Veldheer to take over.
I'll admit that at first I was in agreement. But after some thinking, maybe it's time we all sat down and looked at this in positive manner. Tough to do when it's in regards to the Raiders O-Line, but I'm here to say it is not all bad.
* Let me first off say that this was one preseason games and that any and all observations from preseason should be taken with doubt. Preseason is far different from the real regular season.
Okay so let's look back at the overall matchup. The Raiders O-Line came into Dallas Stadium with the Cowboys already having a game under their belt (not a big advantage but it's at least notable). The O-Line that for the most part was the same as last year sans Cornell Green. So we can assume that the line was at the least slightly better without Green and with Henderson and Satele being in the system longer.
The line was regarded as being weak and undersized and one that would struggle versus 3-4. The line, that at times, could do great things in the running game, and at other times look lost. And one that never looked better than above average in pass protection.
Now let's look at the Dallas defense, mainly the front 7. Consisting of players like Igor Olshansky, Jay Ratliff, Anthony Spencer, DeMarcus Ware, etc. This front seven is considered top-5 in the NFL and the defense as a whole is one of the NFL's elite thanks to great individual personnel, amazing blitz schemes, and a magnificent system. A tough unit to run against and to protect the QB against.
However the first team O-Line only allowed one sack in over a quarter's worth of play and allowed Michael Bush to average over 4 yards a carry. Not only is that a far cry from you would see in games last year, but a far cry from what you would expect against top-tier defense who's scheme and personnel are a nightmarish matchup for this O-Line unit and scheme.
Now while they gave up pressure and were struggling, they were holding their own. Gallery and Henderson in particular played, at the risk of my own credibility, at a Pro Bowl level. Did Satele struggle, yes. Did Carlisle get shoved around, yes. Did Walker look amateur, yes. But this is the Dallas defense. They make the Giants O-Line, in my opinion one of the best O-Lines in the NFL, look second rate.
The fact that we didn't give up more sacks than just one speaks volumes for how far this O-Line has come along. Could they have been better, yes they could have. But i gotta say that I am proud of how well they handled themselves. They looked better than the Bengals O-Line in the preseason opener when Dallas was running rampant on them, barely giving Palmer room to breathe.
So before we go about begging for trading for the still injured Jared Gaither, look once more at this unit. They're a solid enough group who are inconsistent. Going from looking great, to average, to Pittsburgh Steeler bad. However, I can say they are working on their consistency as they only had that one moment of tragic meltdown. Where as last year we would see that at least 4 times a game.
Look at the Ravens O-Line in their preseason opener, they couldn't contain a Panthers pass rush that is missing Julius Peppers. They gave up two sacks to Tyler Brayton. Tyler Brayton people. And we gave up one sack to that loaded front seven of Dallas. Look at Dallas's own O-Line. Houston, a rookie, had a field day out there against an O-Line that's very highly touted.
Am I still worried about the O-Line, you better believe it. We're lucky Campbell took beatings like that daily in Washington or we might have lost him for the year. And though it's preseason and hard to tell if they're as good as they played, IT'S PRESEASON. Even if they aren't that good they have plenty of time to become that good.
If you think that practice can't matter/help that much, it sure as hell can. Especially when they practice against the same front four that had Romo on the turf all game long.
This O-Line isn't great, but I can soundly say it is solid. And for a team that's still growing and is expected to win games because of defense, that is good enough fo me.
Quick Hit:
Darrius Heyward-bey struggled in the preseason opener for the Raiders, but I'm not surprised. His first time facing real competition since the middle of last season is reason enough for me to have doubts of how well he would have played. Add in the man covering him was Terrance Newman.
Newman is a very good corner in the NFL and is one of the few guys who can keep up with DHB stride for stride. That was a nightmare matchup for DHB who's only in his second year. Before calling him a bust, the learning curve for a receiver is about 4 years. For DHB it'll probably be longer as his own coach said he shouldn't have went into the draft in his junior year.
If I say this is DHB's "rookie" year that's why. Because it pretty much is. I don't expect DHB to be great in the beginning, and i think he'll only be average this year. Anything more is great, anything less is nothing to fret about.
Shout-Out:
I wanna give a quick shout-out to Rolando McClain and his family and hope things will be alright.
221 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec'd. agree, and great write up KA1Z3R.
I look forward to our next matchup to get a better evaluation. :)
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
agreed, i’m going to follow the O-Line all through the year and hopefully give out a weekly evaluation plus I will offer quick hits like the DHB one.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I hope they give Campbell and Veldheer a chance to start next week.
I’d like to see how they do against first team defenses. they looked good against 3rd stringers, which I am happy with.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions
hearing some rumors that they could play with the 1st team in camp this week
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
That is something
That might be the best for this team.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions
if they do well with the first team they might start in Chicago or at least come in if Carlisle and Satele collapse again
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I may
fly out to Oakland and give it a try in place of Satele and Carlisle if they don’t get the lead out and start earning their cheques.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions
That's really good news KAIZ3R, I am all for starting Veldheer at C and Campbell RG.
The RaiderLaker
it seems like Cable is willing to get Campbell on the field as soon as possible. If Carlisle gives up a nasty hit like that again, Campbell will get the job in a handwrapped package with a birthday cupcake on top.
As for Veldheer, he’ll be a late season starter, barring injury. He still needs to learn all the callas at the line.
By next year though both should be starting, that’s when the O-Line gets real good.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Solid Commitment To The Run would Have helped...
So now lets take a look at just the 1st team…1st 4 series…And break it down from there to try to understand just what really happened in that game…
Run…Bush 7 for 31yds…
Run….Cartwright 1 for 2yds…
Pass…“JC” 7/13 for 49yds…
21 plays in 4 series…
1st Series…
Pass incomplete…
Pass 2yds…“RB” Reece…
Pass 4yds…“TE”…
Punt…
No Rushing…
2nd Series…
Run Bush 1yd…
Run Bush 5yds…
Flag False Start…Shotgun Pass Formation..
Pass Incomplete….
Punt…
They should have committed to the run on 3rd-n-4 but they didn’t and went in the whole and couldn’t recover…I put that on Hue n the “OL”…Langston Walker’s flag…
3rd Series…
Pass incomplete…
Run Bush 7yds…
Pass 7yds “TE”…
Pass incomplete…
Sack loss of 9 yds…Pass formation…
Pass Bush 8yds…
Punt….
Bush accounted for 15 all purpose yds on that drive…The “TE” 7 and the “QB” loss of 9…I’d say the play calling sucked for not sticking with the run which gave them the opertunity for the sack…
4th Series…
Run Bush 10yds…
Run Bush 0yds…
Pass 14yds “WR”….
Run Bush 5yds…
Pass 10yds “WR”…
Run Bush 3yds…
Run Cartwright 2yds…
Pass incomplete on 4-1 so “TO”…
Why did they pass on 4-1 is anybodies guess…The run was working well enough to go for a single yd…Again Bush accounted for 18yds on the drive…Cartwright 2yds and 2 "WR"s 24yds…I put that on Hue…
I can see issues with the “OL” drawing flags and not getting a push to open better holes on some plays and the play calling on 4-1…
Bush was 7 for 31 n 4.4yd ave overall…Take out the 2 low productive plays and stipulate that was the failure of the “OL” to open a sufficient hole and Bush was 5 for 28yds…Now that’s a 5.6yd ave and damn good by any standards…
When the “OL” performed well the run was there…Had Hue stuck to the run the production may have been better…That flag would not have happened during the 2nd series and the 3rd series would not have ended with an incomplete followed by a 9yd sack and pass too short for 8yds to Bush leading to a punt…Those were the 3 wasted dns after making a 1st dn…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 10:55 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
excellent stuff there but i can understand why Hue wanted to pass as much as he did. He wants to build chemistry with the receivers and Campbell and to shake of their rust. Also he probably wanted to see how the passing offense would look against a defense like Dallas’s, where you’ll be under pressure and your receivers will be having a tough time getting open.
Hue knows we can run the ball well, but I am with him in that we need to see what our passing game can do this year.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
adding onto that, Hue and Cable barely cracked the playbook because you never want to show too much in preseason. If they had let everything loose and done a full gameplan (which you should see in game 3 as most teams do) i have no doubt that the first team offense could have put up points.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I think the media hoopla around Hue works against him.
Level-headedness is the key. I don’t really know what he knows or doesn’t; reports indicate he’s very vocal, but that’s all.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
if Bush was averaging close 4+ yards a carry, he’s doing something right.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Understood -n- Agree...
Your right it’s good to practice everything now before it counts but I was posting sorta angry because of all the crap going around that our “OL” has not improved…We ran the damn ball very effectively and had we stuck to it I believe the outcome would have been better…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions
+1
I do favor Bush over McBroken. I think he is any every down back that can get yards between the tackles and around the ends. The one thing he may be not great at but I am not sure would be receiving McBroken has him there I think. Bush is more durable and overall ahead of McBroken.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
actually Bush has better hands than McFadden and if you can get him on a swing outside versus corners, watch him bowl them over for extra yards.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Yeah
but I don’t think he has the same speed and quickness to get separation. He can do well on swing passes with a quick drop or we called it when I played a “Texas Micky”
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions
very true but I’ll take that over McFadden’s droppy hands.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
+1
here here McBroken is a bust I think. We can trade him if we are lucky. I have had more faith in Bush from day one.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I never wanted Mcfadden and have wanted to trade him since his rookie year. But then again i wanted Glenn Dorsey in that draft.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Well
we can always go back and look at who we should have taken. We have made some great picks when people said “What the fuck is Davis doing?” Ray Guy anyone?
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Dorsey would
be a beast at the 3 tech. KC is trying to play him as 3-4 DE, which was something Rob Ryan tried with Sapp…it just doesn’t work. Dorsey would be a better fit in our Defense.
I wanted Clady, myself…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Aug 16, 2010 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Well
my opinion of Ryan and Sapp would be together they don’t add up to a whole anything on D while they were with the Raiders together.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 16, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Glad you're back, KA1Z3R!
However I disagree with you about the relaxation part – patting ourselves in the back for occasional good never works. Maybe what you wanted to say was that panic is counterproductive. If so, I haven’t seen anyone panicking yet – people are just discussing possible remedies.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:04 AM PDT reply actions
most of the panicking and stuff is from Inside Oakland Raiders. if anything I’m just saying that the line is at least looking improved this year.
No Russell+improved O-Line+better defense= easily enough to get us out of double digit loss streak.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I see your point
But patting ourselves on the back for getting from D to C- is overdoing it. Kepp the pressure on.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
keep, kepp - typing is as hard as plucking the strings of a guitar:)
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions
And I’m sure Cable and Hue will. They wanted better things in that game. But for our first game in a long time versus this Dallas defense. i give us a C+. I think we’re at least above average. And thus meeting my expectations fro this year. i can’t be disappointed, but yes I do want more.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
+1
Like I said before, the optimism for this team, especially inside of this blog is DYING..after ONE preseason Game.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I think it's more of fist impressions...
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
If by optimism, you mean giddy unrealistic expectations, then let such optimism die. I still believe we take the AFC West
and advance to meet one of Balt., NYJ, Indi, and have 8-8. The sooner we all look at reality the better – unless we exploit our running game advantage (including a line that can pass block) – we won’t advance. And if we stubbornly insist that we’re a passing club, then despite our tremendous progress on D, we will not win our division.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions
at least 8-8 I meant to say
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I don’t think we’ll be division winners but 7-9 or 8-8 is very much possible
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Who do you think
takes the division them?
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I still have to say SD with a 9-7 record. They have amazing receiver depth and I said long ago that I think Ryan Matthews could be this year’s rookie running phenom.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
If SD can win the division with a 9-7,
Then we can win this division.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions
The AFC west
division will be a battle of attrition and growth. All the teams are in great flux. Anything can happen.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions
SD is self-destructing. It will be the highlight of the 2010 season!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Denver isn’t far behind. it won’t be long until we run this division.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Exactly why
I am watching this Denver preseason game.
SD looked strong, even without Jackson.
I want to see how Denver will do without the changes.
Hopefully, it was just the Bears sucking, and not SD looking good…5.5 ypc? I hope Matthews turns into something that benefits US.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Bears secondary is easily bottom 5 in the NFL.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
True, but the Bears fromt 7?
Did Peppers Play, with Urlacher and Briggs?
If they did…..
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Those guys are getting old
but I didn’t see them blitz very much, either. I will say Chicago’s Safeties are garbage right now. We’ll know how good they are when we play them this week, but I can see streaks and posts being effective, especially on Zach’s side of the field because it will freeze that safety long enough for Murph or DHB or Schillens to uncover…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Aug 16, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
Urlacher is getting up there and the injuries are starting to pile up and taking their toll. I think the fear of him by offenses is based more on history and reputation than his now ability.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 16, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I'll still feel better this result coming from our own improvement where necessary
but will take it however it comes. Not sure what to expect from Denver, but I don’t like anything they’re currently doing, and question McDaniels every move.
without Dumerville they’re proper screwed.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
The Groom speak the truth - there is no falsehood in his words
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
see the season tix? Gonna have to look hard at which I'll be able to do
I’ll try for all, of course, but not sure if I can swing it!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
8 more honeymoon days - take them all!
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I look at how Baltimore
and San DiegNO played offense under Cam Cameron and I’m hopeful that we hit teams with a steady dose of Bush and DMC to set up the deep ball off play action when we Max Protect. Murphy got loose on one of those-type plays but the pass was a just a little off. Play action will also set up Zach on some seams, especially against a Cover 2, or teams with aggressive Safeties (see Chargers, Donkeys, Cardinals, and maybe even the Queefs.) It’s all going to depend on how the vertical shots are set up, but they’ll be there, and we should be able to help the line protect with a RB.
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Aug 16, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes, imgine if this O-line had played the full game...... that would be 4 sacks given by both Satele and Cooper, simple math...
I bet Henderson and Walker would give one each too. Therefore small finesse guys are not going to cut it against strong teams, I’m all for adding bulk,strength, quickness (Veldheer,Campbell). Coop is old and relies on finesse, it’s diminishing now. Satele can’t take big strong DT’s, I bet he will claim an injury though and Veldheer will start… it’s only a matter of time, we will see either Veldheer or Campbell on the starting line-up this season.
I’m not panicky, I’m just greedy and i know both of those rooks I mentioned have great talent to start since the bar is set pretty low, all we need is Solid play, not getting pushed around play.
The RaiderLaker
I concur 1000000%
The bar must be set high from the start.
That said, I think KA1Z3R’s point was that we shouldn’t panic permanently. I say, keep the pressure on in a supremely level-headed way.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
I don’t think that would have been a 6 sack game. At the most I say 3 because we would have been running a LOT more and we would have opened a full playbook.
As for Veldheer and Campbell, I agree in that we will probably see both starting before years end, I’ll estimate around week 12. For now though we have to remember that what they did was versus 2nd and 3rd string. Veldheer looks like he could be a great center once he learns how to do all the line calls, and Campbell will get time because Carlisle is old and injury prone.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Simple math would then say
our defense would have sacked Romo 16 times, and the team 20. One doesn’t correlate to the other.
Why not? That was the premise set up in the post.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Laoren, yes, That would've happened. Our D is awesome as I have said before. But then again Romo gave up 2 sacks to us.
I actually believe we would’ve sacked him 7-8 times in a game. We would’ve gotten sacked 6-7 times since Satele and Coop suck.
Their D is strong and have technique, our D has a blend of strenght and speed that they (Cowboy D) do not. Our D will eventually be better than the big/choker Cowboy D this year.
The RaiderLaker
That's not smoke you're blowing, PantyRaider. We'll play like we practice and since preseason is the highest form
of practice (dress rehearsal) we should be doing everything in optimum fashion – including, especially, play calling. I wasn’t impressed with Hugh’s debut at all. But I do like his fire and discipline approach which makes us look much teamlike than before. As for the O-Line, it did warm-up, as did Bush, who got stronger with each carry. I believe Carlisle and Satele are liabilities and Langston has to wipe the shit-eating grin off his face and focus. I saw what StD’s DL did to Chicago’s line and I will go mad if we’re not better than Thursday when we face the faggers October 10th.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 11:06 AM PDT reply actions
we can take solace in this though, our D-Line and pass rush are much better than the run oriented Bears defense. It’s also much better than last year in the opener when Rivers was getting pressured and knocked down.
Added bonus, McNeil still not signed.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
We're talking about the O-Line so shifting to D only makes us feel good
… except, LCB, MLB’s inability (still) to cover tight ends, and Kelly’s inconsistency.
See, I can even make myself uncomfortable dwelling on our D – which is still not good enough to get us to the SB.
I love Mike Waffle and what he’s done – a brilliant job with our DL – he deserves our thanks. As for Hugh’s playcalling …. the jury is out.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
In terms of defense, if we can rush the passer and stop the run (like we did excellently in Dallas) and move Nnamdi around like we have in camp, I think that at least is enough for playoffs. That is if the offense can become a consistent unit.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
The coverage to the TE
was by Tyvon..hence the reason why people were disappointed by his coverage against Witten.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions
a young safety will give up passes to Witten. I’d be worried about my fantasy football team if Witten didn’t. If he can handle the tight ends in KC and Denver and fare decently versus Gates than I am happy.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I Want To See That Commitment To The Run Immediately Not Later...
If we are going to be a “SmashMouth” run the ball “O” than lets do it in practice and the games…Than see how the pass can open up after that…It takes time to establish anything so it’s not done in a few plays scattered in…Take the time to establish it and see how that works now…latter in the game after we established the run the pass was there…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
you’ll see us committing to the run in about week 3, till then it’s Hue and Cable just wanting to get a look at Campbell handling pressure and building chemistry.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
they did it last year in preseason with Russell, then we saw them run the ball more during the season.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
The past may not be a good basis for prediction
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
true and I’m not saying i don’t want us running the ball. I’m an old school guy who thinks running the ball and playing good defense is still a championship formula (if u can call a 15 year old and old school guy)
But it seems like a similar scenario as last year’s preseason and Cable seems to be treating it the same way. QB with a lot of new receivers getting his chemistry worked on in preseason. Didn’t work with Russell, but it might with Campbell.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Don't blame me for watching some Saint and Patriont games.... I'm all for passing more than running..
The RaiderLaker
with the 1st team offense
the pats ran more than pass the ball.
So what KA1Z3R is saying makes perfect sense. They want to see(evaluate), and help build chemistry, with Campbell and the passing game. Just like probably BB wants to help and see(evaluate) how our running game will be.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
exactly. With the O-Line looking thin, New England is hoping to become a balanced attack to protect Brady. Also if Welker goes down they better hope they have a running game to fall back on.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
even if welker goes down, we'll have a passing game.
Do you know how of one of my man love’s named Julian Edelman?
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
I am really worried about DHB,
because 1. I don’t think he’s that talented, and 2. while not-so-talented players may excel by practice, I think past emotional traumas/disappointments may be getting the better of him. It’s hard to wipe the slate clean, and I am talking from his perspective.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Well I Think The Best Way To Help His Game Is To Run Strong...
Force the "DB"s to play run 1st and “DHB” n Jacoby/Miller will be able to burn them deep in single coverage…Than there is also the pass to the backs all of which forces the "DB"s to commit closer to the “LOS” instead of playing deep…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Right. Keep the DBs closer and exploit Raider Speed to get by them. DHB has a lot to learn.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Worry after the season starts not
in some exhibition game where he only played two series. I cannot understand this fixation with DHB. As if he is the difference maker as to whether this team is successful or not. He will start the season, he will catch passes, he will get open and he will score some TD’s.
Hopefully, then the incessant worry over DHB will cease.
If he does as you say.
And if he doesn’t?
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
If he doesn't then that only confirms a trend in poor draft picks during Al's, how does one say,
slump. Meanwhile, we have several good targets in Zach, Louis, Yamon and likely JLH and Chaz – the latter two only if they overcome their various psychological and./or physical demons.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately, I have to agree.
If he doesn’t then it’s another bad draft pick…something that we do not need right now.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions
I can’t buy into that because while there are immediate star rookie receivers, the majority take a lot of time to develop. I don’t expect much from DHB, but we will see improvement from him for sure.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Still "ShellShocked" From Last Season...
We went into every game throwing the ball and running was an afterthought because we knew we could run the ball after the past 2 season…When it really counted we couldn’t run for squat…Afraid of that happening again…Running is a mind-set that needs to be established now…least that’s my perception…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
yes but in last camp we didn’t even address the run at all. This year Hue is installing power blocking specifically for that run game, Bush is getting much more work in camp, and Cable is working on ways to work Mcfadden based on what he does well.
The team knows we need to focus on the run, but i have to agree that getting chemistry and rhythm down with Campbell and the receivers is a bigger need right now.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
But Not When It Comes To That "OL"...
That’s where the attitude needs to be developed…They need to know they can go out and lean on a “DL” play after play and beat them down…It builds confidence and than the pass blocking becomes easy because the defenders are biting on the play-action….Let these guys get used to pushing people around and than they get that “MeanStreak” going…Now that’s what “SmashMouth” is all about….
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Campbell needs to get used to passing behind that OL, and throwing to his receivers. The only way to do this, is him experiencing it in the first place. We need to have him pass quite a bit in pre-season, so we do not have to be a one-dimensional offense.
A better passing game, also lets the defense back off a bit, for successful run play.
We need to be diverse, and not rely on just a running game.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I'll give you an example: The patriots last year.
In the first half, we were very successful. Reason why is because we not only pass the ball, but we ran quite a bit as well. The pats led all teams in scoring(and I think yards. if not top 5.) in the 1st half, but in the second half, we were bottom 10.
Reason why was because we became one-dimensional with just passing, and ran VERY few times.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
why was that anyway, didn’t Maroney get injured?
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
No. Our OC thought our offense can be dominant with just Brady, Moss, Welker.
And because of that… we were exposed in a way. Not being diverse will do that.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
"needs to" is the operative word
Until what he needs to do happens, keep the pressure on. Btw, this ADTHD.NET is awesome for getting some perspective.
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions
I know. I used it AFTER the raiders game(I didn't know about it till after... go figure).
And the only way he can get used to passing behind our OL, is t have him PASS the ball more. What better way to do that, than in pre-season? I say have him pass the ball as much as possible. let him BUILD chemistry with everyone. We are not saying to abandon the running game, but just to have some sort of passing game.
We need to try to be as diverse as possible, to keep the opponent guessing. I’m sorry, but not even play action will help if Campbell doesn’t have good chemistry with OL or receivers.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Of course we must be diverse. But establishing the OLs confidence (a confidence based on positive experience)
should be a main objective with the remaining 3 preseason games and accomplished by setting them up for success by power blocking (which is what they are best suited for) on Bears, 49r & Seattle DLs. Blast, Blast, Smash & Maul – Grind and Crush until they realize that they are capable of having their way and asserting their will. This O-Line needs confidence and rushing, as PP said, will help the O-L gain possitive experience and make easier their pass blocking transition. Bush, Bennett and Cartwright are all capable of Raider style between T bang-outs of 3.5-4.5 yard gains. Campbell is a quick study and, like Grad, has a steep learning curve, so passing away our preseason is unnecessary and counter-productive.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
We can establish confidence A LOT MORE
if the OL knew they can not only run block, but pass block.
Having Campbell get sacked on a pass play for -5 yards, is A LOT MORE demoralizing then Bush loosing 1 yard on a run play. Not to mention, that our OL commits penalties still, so we would be facing 2nd and longs, and 3rd and longs PLENTY of times this season. the OL needs to learn to pass block better, so Campbell can get comfortable Early.
Also, how about if we are down by 3 points, with 1 minute left? How the hell is running the ball, with run blocking, going to help our situation? Imo, It won’t! The majority of game comebacks are from passing the ball, and we need to establish that.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
In The Prevent One Good Weapon Is The Run If Fast Or Passing To The backs...
It’s what they don’t expect that is usually open…Now we get our "WR"s to deliver down field blocks to spring the "RB"s loose…Next game that “D” is worried about that run in the prevent and has to play it different so every successful venture carries over to the following week…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Bottom Line: The Run sets up the Pass - we must establish the run and over the course of the
first few weeks the pass will develop. We’ll control the ball, amass 1st downs, our D will be fresh and victory Vil bee Ouss.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions
the pass also sets up the run.
It will have the DBs play deeper.
We must establish some sort of passing game, but we can’t if our OL hasn’t improved on run blocking. the majority of points scored is through the air. Running the ball establishes control, but passing the ball helps with that control, AND puts points on the board much more better, simply because we don’t have to rely on our offense to be inside 5 yard line(because that’s usually where team run the ball to score).
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
To hell with the DBs if we're racking up 5+ yards a whack. You speak as one impatient for spectacular plays
the pass also sets up the run.
It will have the DBs play deeper.
the majority of points scored is through the air.
This may or may not be the norm, at any rate, many points don’t translate necessarily to victories – which is the only record in the stat books that counts.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Points certainly contribute to them.
How did you think we won in Dallas on thursday? Scoring points, and playing great D. Point is, we had to score points.
All Im saying is, is that in PRE-SEASON, we should have our OL build some kind of pass blocking improvement. It does nothing but help. There WILL be times when we NEED to pass the ball, and we can’t run play-action every time to establish that, other wise, the other teams D, will be a lot more careful late in the game, and will not bite.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure we won in Dallas, Thursday. We were behind by 3 pts when they pulled
their starters. If our O is on the field more we’ll have more opportunities to throw the ball and gain pass-blocking experience. But, if we do as we’ve done over the past few years (come out like a NE or NO club – pass happy) we are not establishing ourselves as we are or are going to be this season. With more reps via the Rush – which I’m certain is effective given our personnel – we will (to repeat myself) attain ball control and the fruits that blossom from that bud are sweet.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I never said we should abandon our running game, or be pass happy.
I am simply stating that we should have our OL learn to pass block more in pre-season, to help Campbell gain chemistry with them(chemistry can also mean where he can look at the OL and DL matchups, and predict where he’ll might get pressured first), and in turn, get more chemistry with his WRs. That’s all.
We are a running team first, but when the situation arises where we need to pass the ball, then our OL will be better equipped to.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Okay, they gameplan for it. you know what also they will gameplan for?
The play action. because the previous week, according to you, our play actions were destroying teams…
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Last year our game plan was principle was: "One size fits all." Of course, it failed as off as not
We expect this season unique gameplans that address each opponent’s weaknesses and need the whole array of possibilities. But basically, as we establish the rushing game the passing game becomes much easier.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
And... if we establish some sort of passing game, our running game will be A LOT easier.
don’t you see? We need to try and be good for both pass, and run blocking! They help each other tremendously, and it will help our offense be overall more better, and diverse!
You talk about expecting new gameplans, addressing each opponents weakness’s with an array of new possibilities, so how does not helping to establish a passing game, with Campbell getting chemistry, IN PRE-SEASON, not do anything but help, and improve that?
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Two Way To View It Are Shadows Of Each Other...
If you establish the run 1st the “DB” need to focus on that play up in support…Once that’s established the pass is drawing single coverage and the deeper routs are open…Once you hit that with the big play the "DB"s play deep in prevent and you can run the ball down their throats…
That works well between the 20’s…In the RedZone things change with the short field…But our “O” will be run 1st w a strong dose of passing to the “RB”/“FB” n “TE”….This will make things easy on the "WR"s…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
How will the play-action exactly "work" all the time
if Campbell doesn’t have passing chemistry with ou OL and receivers?
Especially after he pulls fakes the handoff, the chances of him getting pressured immediately are high because our OL is not used to pass blocking much.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Like Chaz's left foot, if the O-linemen aren't ready yet - then, etc.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Then don't even let it bother you? Forget about it?
I don’t agree with you.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Every one of our Olinemen have years of experience (Jr. High, High School, College, Pros
so, what I’m saying is, 3 weeks is mostly for timing, coordination and confidence, in a word, playing as a unit. Individually, if they don’t know how to block a pass rusher yet – fuck em.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Right. And when the regular season comes along, and they STILL can't block a pass rusher. Fuck em.
Campbell will get sacked, facing 3rd and longs will be fun, if we are down by 7-10 points late in the 4th quarter i can’t wait to see what will happen with our pass blocking.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions
D will hold most teams on our schedule under 17 points. With Janikowskie we're good
for 6/game. So, the O needs only 1 TD/half. This will be achieved with Power Blocking and our RBs. Moreover, it will set up the pass for Jason or Bruce to either Murphy or Zach … or perhaps Chaz (when he can make it) or Figurs.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions
That's not always going to be the situation though.
The pats D, before they faced the saints, had NEVER allowed over 17 points(or I think it was the average… I’m not sure), but they got destroyed, giving up 34 points that game.
You will get games where the raiders will give up more, I am 90% sure.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
that's why we should not relax one bit about anything
by Spirals galore on Aug 15, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
exactly.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
#1 Passing To The Backs -n- "TE" Off The Play-Action....
This is easy to establish and get a rhythm for and it’s also very quick so the “OL” need not hold those blocks as long…Once this is established than the deeper routs open up when the "DB"s are forced to play up in run/short passing support…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions
The majority of blitzing plays have man coverage in them.
So there will be people covering our TE, and you DBs. Also take safeties into account.
My point is, is that it won’t always be just a “quick dumpoff.” He’s going to be in the pocket making the decision. Especially if there are deep routes.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Campbell has a lot of experience with this situation
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, but with a different team, and playbook.
It will not be the same. And since it’s his first year here, I can’t ay for sure that he’ll have a successful passing season unless our OL learns to run block better.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions
*pass block!
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
If The Concentration Is On The Run And Trowing To The Backs-n-"TE" It Will be Quick...
The deep routs take time to develop…The only was our “QB” gets that time is…
#1…We have a very good if not great “OL” that can hold their blocks long enough for the receivers to complete their patterns…3-4 ticks…
#2…The front 7 are forced to check down on the run 1st and thus have their pursuit to our “QB” delayed for a tick or 2….
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Okay, dump it off to the RB after the play-action, and chances are that the CB or safety will meet him soon.
Dump it off to the TE… we won’t know if he is covered or not. And then Campbell will have to rely on the receivers completing their routes.
I say that needs to have at least 3-4 seconds in the pocket. I hope our OL can pass block for him. Even the play-action itself takes about 2 seconds, so that has their DL an extra 2 seconds to penetrate our pass blocking OL.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Checking Down On The Run Slows Their Pursuit...
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Right. You think they will do that every time though?
Even if they gameplan for those play actions because that and running the ball were basically the only things you were doing the week before?
Sure, they may bite a couple, maybe even 5 times. But they will catch on to it. You can’t rely on it. We need to establish the passing game to keep the opponent guessing more, and in order to do that, we need campbell to establish chemistry, and have our OL improve on our pass blocking.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Establish The Passing Game To The backs-n-"TE"s 1st...
Than w 3 on 3 we can establish the deep pass…Now when they play back to protect the deep ball we run down their throats…
Consistency is always a problem and adjustments need to be made…But if we can establish the run 1st than we can dictate to the “D” what they do…If we try to pass behind a weak “OL” those “D” will be dictating to us what we can do like in years past…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Let them with ears, hear; them with understanding, heed
If we try to pass behind a weak "OL" those "D" will be dictating to us what we can do like in years past…
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
IN PRE-SEASON GUYS.
I’m not saying that in the regular season, we should stray from our running game. I know we are a run first team.
WHAT I AM SAYING IS, is that IN PRE_SEASON we should have our OL pass block more, to help campbell gain chemistry with them when we NEED to pass the ball.
If we try to pass behind a weak "OL" those "D" will be dictating to us what we can do like in years past…
Well I have news for you! There will be times in the regular season where we HAVE to pass the ball! We will not establish control ALL THE TIME with our running game!
I agree. Establish the run first. But if that doesn’t work, what will you do? Exactly. Your thinking of our ideal situation, but the truth is, our ideal situation of controlling their D with what we’ll do, will not always happen!
If we have our OL pass block in the pre-season with the aim of improving our pass blocking(which it can do nothing BUT help to improve), then we can be more diverse.
If our running game isn’t working, that means one thing: They are PLAYING GREAT RUN DEFENSE. So what should we do? The defense is dictating what we do PantRaider, but what I would do is: Play some passing plays. If they are playing the run, some play-action, not play-action every play, but some, and REGULAR passing plays, will work. Just playing play-action is not making us diverse. We need to do screens, quick slants, deep passes to stretch the D out. That’s how we will win more game. Not being one dimensional.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Let them hear with ears:
If our running game isn’t working, that means one thing: They are PLAYING GREAT RUN DEFENSE. So what should we do? The defense is dictating what we do PantRaider, but what I would do is: Play some passing plays. If they are playing the run, some play-action, not play-action every play, but some, and REGULAR passing plays, will work. Just playing play-action is not making us diverse. We need to do screens, quick slants, deep passes to stretch the D out. That’s how we will win more game. Not being one dimensional.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Depends on the D we are facing at the moment. SD can be thrown
against but is tough against the rush. Yes, we should always exploit a team’s weakness. Ideally, we would have an O-Line that meets the challenge of any situation…we are not yet there, but do have an O-L that is capable of rush blocking against most teams out their … along with a stable of stout RBs that (not counting DMC) can work with our Line to get the yards necessary to move the chains and control the ball. I’m not calling for one dimensional offense or a vanilla playbook but rather looking at the realities of what we are working with and against.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions
right.
we would have an O-Line that meets the challenge of any situation…we are not yet there, but do have an O-L that is capable of rush blocking against most teams out
We are not yet there, so why don’t we WORK our way there? In Pre-season? Why don’t we have our OL try and IMPROVE their pass blocking? In Pre-Season? instead of waiting for the next great OL to magically make our OL become a pass and run blocking OL?
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
We will get more reps at pass blocking by contoling the ball
If Hugh continues with his Cable-like pass-happy approach, we will continue to be “3 and out” whereas, if we run emphasize our stremph – rushing – we will maintain ball control and set-up the pass by bringing bodies to the LOS. The, as we march up and down the field, the OL will get more reps than Goodell can shake his finger at.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions
So you are against the OL building up on pass blocking in Pre-Season?
It’s not the regular season, so I don’t really understand why you would not try this. Pass blocking also helps with footwork, which is a great thing.
Running is our strength. It will set up the pass(and vice-versa). I agree with what you are saying.
If we practice pass blocking more this PRE-SEASON, it will help Campbell get more chemistry with his OL when passing, and just by passing the ball he gets chemistry with his receivers.
Now, I expect us to be running team this season, but there will be situations, whether we like it or not, where we must pass the ball. I think our OL will be better equipped to pass block, if we give them the experience this pre-season, which I am very much fine with. It can only help. Our running game is pretty much sound, and doesn’t need as much help.
I do hope that Hue’s doesn’t go pass happy in the regular season.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Here's something else to consider, namely, that which
separates the good linemen from the chaff. The good lineman attacks – whether the play is a run or a pass. The lineman’s mindset should be ATTACK (after all, the DL is on the defensive). Our linemen need to learn this key principle – and haven’t yet under Cable (and his lackey line coaches). Look at the rookies who are succeeding – Buluga’s, Iupati’s, Petrus’, Okung, they don’t back up when they block in any situation – they attack because they have the warrior instinct or have been well coached. If our line coaches emphasized the attacking technique/mindset instead retreating – we wouldn’t even be having this debate.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
The good lineman attacks – whether the play is a run or a pass.
Not when your facing a speedy pass rusher…
Look at the rookies who are succeeding – Buluga’s, Iupati’s, Petrus’, Okung, they don’t back up when they block in any situation – they attack because they have the warrior instinct or have been well coached
They also have very good footwork, which I can say at least 3 of our starting OL do not.
If our line coaches emphasized the attacking technique/mindset instead retreating – we wouldn’t even be having this debate.
I think this isn’t the problem for run blocking. They attack pretty well. But in pass blocking… attacking won’t always work, which is why they need to work on it a bit more, in case them passing situations arises, and they face them speedy pass rushers.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
I'm basing my opinion on certain realities we are dealing with while
you seem to be basing your opinion on general principles of offensive strategy in general.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
The reality is, is that it's pre-season, and we can use this opportunity to have our Ol work on the one thing it is having problems with:
Pass blocking.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
The Pump-Fake Short Is Another Tool Used With The Play-Action
If we establish the run and throwing quick to the backs-n-"TE"s than the play-action followed by a pump-fake short will hold the “DL” n draw the attention of the “DB” which gives the “WR” time to make separation so the deep ball can be thrown…
That's a lot of factors to be put into for something you seem so sure will work.
That’s like a perfect scenario, and the game of football displays FAR from perfect scenarios.
I can tell you, not every play will the bite the play-action, not every play will “hold” the DL, not every play, will draw the attention of the DB(especially an experienced one).
Which is why not every play-action will work at all, especially when you are facing a team with a lot of experience.
Again, there will be plenty of times where we’ll have to throw the ball downfield. Just ask Grad who had to do it facing the Steelers last year. When the clock is ticking away, and we are down in points, throwing the ball is a must. Just doing play-actions WILL NOT WORK! Our OL, in the pre-season, needs to develop that pass blocking a little more.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 16, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions
I Love The Deep Ball BUT Not Behind A Weak "OL"...
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
A beautiful dress on a homely woman - doesn't work
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
4 "DB"s On 3 "WR"s -n- "TE" -w- "RB" Out Of The Backfield Means A "LB" Will Be In Coverage..
Now how are they going to double anyone…That’s exactly the situation that opens up the passing game to the "WR"s deeper…
Not really. If that was the case, the jets should have thought of that last year.
Other than that, 3 WRS, and 1 TE. these are the usual matchups:
3 CBs will be playing man coverage on the 3 Wrs. the safety will cover the TE, with the LB keeping the TE in check, if the TE goes over the middle.
that leaves the OTHER safety, to look out for the deep ball, RB(the idea situation if you are running the play-action).
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
3-3-5 Is That What Your Posting Here Or A 4-2-5 Which Would be The Raiders' "D"...
#1…If the run is already established a “S” is playing up on the “LOS” in run support…
#2..In a 4-3 or 3-4 set a “LB” or “S” is now on the “TE” if he run a pattern…
#3..Who/How are they going to double any “WR”…One on one is what opens up the passing game to the "WR"s….
They don't have to double anyone. Hell, even zone blitzes might be better.
the point is, the play-action will take maybe 2 seconds. 3 at the longest. Which means that their 3 or 4 DL, will have 2-3 seconds on our awesome pass blocking OL. That’s not including any pass rushing OLBs on the outside.
It should take maybe 1-3 seconds for a QB to make a quick read and throw.
Now the other team can 5-7(6-8 if it’s 3-4) guys in coverage. Yes, they can have ALL 3 or 4 of their LBs in coverage, with 1 LB playing zone in the middle, or watching the QB.
Now, zone or man coverage, our OL has to hold their DL with a minimum of maybe 3-4 seconds, which can be done, but it also depends if our OL either:
a) misses a block
b) one side of our OL may get overwhelmed by 3 rushers(say 2 attacked the edge very quickly, and the other one when more towards the middle)
c) The OL never will know exactly WHERE the blitzes will come from
d) The defense doesn’t bite on the play-action, and everyone but the DL drops into coverage.
The play-action never offers a perfect scenario, which is why I have stressed that our OL NEEDS to do more pass blocking this pre-season not only for your play actions but for a regular passing game when the situation calls for it(ie. 3rd and longs. late in the game when we need a game winning drive, etc.) to help campbell, which will in turn help campbell build chemistry with his new OL and WRs.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 15, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
There hasn't been any investment in the OL in years
you get what you pay for and Al has not paid a quality lineman in many years. I think Carlisle was handed a few million and he is marginal. Satele is marginal, the backups are marginal. He paid Cornell Green pretty well to get penalties and only this year decided to cut his losses with him. Langton Walker is serviceable but he’s not really going to help.
good point
Al over spends at every position but the o-line. Exhibit A r. seymores paycheck.
Calling cornell, satele and carlisle “marginal” is rather half full. They suck.
Not sure why we pretend as if the o-line isnt important. IMO the o-line is the MOST important aspect of a offense.
by rat, el rat, mr. rat, the rat on Aug 15, 2010 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions
In other news….
Kyle Boller sucks and I’d rather keep Colt Brennan as our 3rd stringer.
"It's like Will Smith, remember the Fresh Prince? Get the ball don't let nobody else shoot? That's kinda what the offense can be sometimes, and they're just standing around waiting for Monta to make a play"
-MT2
by golden_solitude on Aug 15, 2010 2:41 PM PDT reply actions
After reading through the comments..I have decided that people are taking WAY to much from a preseason game.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
by JaKe. on Aug 15, 2010 3:00 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I think we need some football. Now.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
It's football Jake, finally some football... bear with us...
Plus even if its the pre-season the O-line shouldn’t lagg because Campbell can get injured if they don’t do good. Imo, it’s because the C and RG suck, even if it were the Reg. season i’m done with both those guys, even last season i saw the same BS, it’s time for change in those 2 positions that is all i’m saying. In the bears game all i ask of all is to look at the o line, look at the flaws regarding a weak C and RG.
The RaiderLaker
kinda hoping for Carlisle to suck again as long as it doesn’t affect Jason Campbell’s health. Cause then we get Bruce Campbell (most likely)
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I like that
At least Campbell shows passion and interest to learn. He is “very coachable” as my basketball coach patient/friend says.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions
heard someone say he is the Rolando McClain of the offense
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Hmmm
Nice compliment BUT it sounds just a little strong as a whole. Maybe in passion, enthusiasm and coachability but not in natural talent me thinks.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 15, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Is Rolando already making that big of an impression? I mean, someone’s comparing a 6 year vet to him? Wow.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
BHB struggled?
How did DHB struggle if Campbell only threw one pass his way? wasn’t even that catch-able.
It was said that DHB was weak against the man coverage,
And that he couldn’t get off of his corner.
Watching the game again, I would say that the routes were ehh, but as far as weak, he got some separation.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions
It's like Murph said; they thrive off the synergy they get from alll three of he, Schilens and DHB for it to happen
We’ll see it. If they can just stay healthy. I hope the Chaz bs improves.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
I think if we cracked open more of the playbook and gave him some nice deep slants off play action you would see him make some nice plays. Terrance Newman struggles defending on play action. Great speed but not a very good guy when it comes to play and route recognition
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
dhb didnt struggle
he never had the opportunity to make a reception. I wouldnt throw a ball to receiver that cant catch either.
On the other hand jlh had a decent night. he plays special teams as well….
by rat, el rat, mr. rat, the rat on Aug 15, 2010 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I still have huge problems with the personnel up front. They got better by subtraction, but the additions will take too long for immediate gratification
My problem was the play calling evidenced Hue calling plays to minimize the weakness our line is by getting the ball out quickly: a great strategy, but we’ve clearly got some time to get it right with our receiving corps. I’m not ready to panic, but my fears that our personnel hasn’t improved enough to give our offense that fair chance it deserves to truly improve and gain some dominance, then we’ll need some trench dominance on the offensive side similar to what we’re seeing from the revamped defense. Great sack percentage and lots of pressure.
O line just doesn’t cut the mustard right now, and I’m not satisfied as is. We need a true left tackle. Mario can be good, but I want someone to dominate the line, and it starts there.
Great to have you back KA1Z3R! And go Raiders. Oh, and by the way, I’m a season tix holder: best wedding present ever maybe? Best wife, for sure, despite the New England fanhood thing!
hope this pic works! I suck at these!
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
I don’t get the criticizing of Hue’s playcalling. He didn’t even open up a fourth of the playbook. You don’t go with the full playbook in preseason.
If this was a real game, Bush would have gotten way more carries in the same time frame, play action would have been seen 3-4 times, and Miller would have had deeper routes. Until regular season comes and we take the handcuffs off the playcalling, you can’t really judge it right now.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
If practice is what the preseason is about, then we should be opening the playbook and practicing. Having said that,
the best way is to open it gradually more over the course of the 4 prep games. But, as for those who believe it is better to not open the playbook at all – reasoning that other teams will therefore know our plays (a la Gruden), my polite answer is this: if our playbook consists of gimmicks then we’re in deep shit and if we don’t practice during preseason, we’ll be practicing (like an attorney practices law) while we’re in the greatest courtroom in the land – the field of battle.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
nobody opens the full playbook in preseason.
Also it will be opened more and more gradually, like every team in the NFL does.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
Of course not; but it needs to be opened gradually to practice the plays there. Keeping it tightly closed during preseason
is utter folly.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
just saying (so there are no regrets later)
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Exactly. Plus, am I the only one who saw the screens? I saw quite a bit of succesful screens.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
not exactly a criticizing of the playbook, but rather gathering that the playbook will work to use techniques as a crutch for the weakness on the line
and not so much of Hue. He’s doing what he can with what he has. That’s my problem. I feel we lack personnel on the line; at least the sufficient personnel to really make a push at the division.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Mario has Pro Bowl talent. Same for Gallery. Satele is a HUGE risk. Veldheer is real solid. Campbell can be really good with time. Walker is solid.
Come seasons start, I’d like to see this:
LT- Henderson
LG- Gallery
C- Satele
RG- Walker
RT- Veldheer.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
And where do you surmise this "pro bowl talent" from?
No nominations? Inconsistent performance? I don’t think so, man…
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Posting pics isn’t that hard. When you copy&paste the URL, don’t highlight the http:// thing, cause the tree already has that typed in for you. Example.

True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
lol it’s like Nnamdi telling everyone “Think about it and you will see how to post pictures”
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
for some reason I can't post some pics I send from my phone
the same things I do to post the pics I do successfully don’t work all the time for others. I’m just an idiot when it comes to upload/download, smartphone shit…
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Ah. You’re using a smartphone. That may be the problem, ‘cause I’m on my laptop. Haha.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
Anyways, the pic is of season tix i just got
here’s a link to my facebook post:
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Link tool fail?
I’m striking out: here it is
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/profile.php?id=1124041134
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
and click on profile, lemme see if I can get the whole thing in there this time in this final attempt
I’m a R-tard on comps sometimes. No patience…
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
Denver Scored already...
They’re lighting up the Bengals defense.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 4:11 PM PDT reply actions
Chad
made Bailey fall…LOL
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
relieved I didn’t draft them in fantasy draft.
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
I grabbed Dallas. Glad I did after seeing that D Thursday.
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
i got Niners and Saints
Evey- "Are you a crazy person?"
V- "I'm quite sure they'll say so."
V for Vendetta, blowing your mind away since 2005.
They're throwing 20-30 yards downfield....
And Kyle threw a deep bomb.
Might be a problem for us, especially with coverage woes.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Damn,
ANOTHER deep pass.
In Bruce We Trust
by NFLanalyzerfromhome on Aug 15, 2010 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions
No worries. Pre-Season. McDouche will find a way to choke this season..He’s so natural at it, it’s almost as if he was a Charger in a past life..
True knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing
"MuleHead"s Appear One Dimensional At Best...
They can’t run and they can’t stop the run either…Cincy ran it down their throats…No stats for Fargas…
“O” gained…
Rush…15 for 36yds…2.4ave…
“D” gave up…
40 for 191yds n 4.8 ave….
But of course these stats are worthless so no sense in debating whether the Raiders “D” should go to the “BigNickel” against a team like Denver w “MM” as the extra “S” in a “4-2-5” alignment to take away the threat of the pass and force them into their weakness running the ball against our now stout run “D” so I just wont bother posting that…..
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Waist The Preseason Trying To Get This Team To Do What It Can't Do Consistently
Looks like the problems with the passing game are deep and the passes are not…This from “J-Mac” and I follow the Twitter stuff…
-———————————————-
Another day, another practice session that doesn’t remind anyone of the glory days of Sid Gillman. At this point, the Kerry Collins of 2004-05 is starting to look good.
If you’ve been reading my Twitter page, it’s clear the Raiders’ passing game has left a lot to be desired more days than not.
Too may incompletions that stray too far from the target. Too many dropped passes. Too many routes cut short with receivers looking back with a surprised look on their face.
….during shorts and shells and seven-on-seven drills….good teams light it up in those situations….The Raiders are not lighting it up. The last few days, in fact, they seem to have regressed a bit. They’re certainly not any better to my untrained eye than they were a week and a half ago.
After saying all the "QB"s are hit-n-miss this is reported…
Louis Murphy makes the most impressive physical plays, but also misses a few chances at sensational chances _ missing them by a fraction _ and dropping some easy ones.
Chaz Schlilens is getting back into the mix, made a few catches Sunday, and continues to be the one receiver who makes it look smooth and easy when he is healthy and feeling good.
Either the Raiders start making some serious progress in a short period of time, or expect this year’s M.O. to be a team that relies on running the ball, playing defense and throwing sparingly until they join a where most teams live by the pass.
I think that says it all..And that’s exactly why I’m pimping the Rushing and throwing to the backs n “TE” until the vertical games opens up…Otherwise we will be what we were last season with the “D” dictating to us what we can do…Nothing at all…And our "QB"s will be down for the count…
Can we afford to pay that price…
Time To Come To Grips With Who We Are -n- Who We Are Not...
We may not be a legitimate vertical passing team until sometime around mid season…Realistically it may take that long or longer to get this squad up to speed in that area…Chaz is the man if healthy…Murphy is decent support…Miller/Ford w “DHB” can stretch the "D"s and open things up underneath while maybe drawing away the double team to set Chaz-n-Murphy free….But to imagine we will open this season as any resemblance of a polished passing attack is a bit foolish in my book…Not with that project in front of them…That “OL”…
No excuses necessary - things are as they are. We have an O-Line that CAN rush block -they are big strong players that
complement our RBs for a Balt. jets type O. We have good QBs and a top notch pair of TEs. We can move the chains with a rushing offense that will enable the pass. We must not “try to be like other teams”, we are the RAIDERS – made in the image of Al Davis (version ?) which has taken shape in the form of a Solid Run Defense and a powerful rushing Offense. Get another hurkey lineman when they starting trimming in a couple of weeks and use the Power Blocking scheme. Nice try, Cable – you’ve done well with acquisitions, for the most part, but Langston Carlise and Satele will be eaten alive – Mario, if you continue as you did in Dallas then you have earned my respect. Gallery, please stay healthy and Valdheer and Campbell – get ready for incoming action – you’re going to have to smash open holes for Bush, Bennet, Cartwrite & Reece.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Build Confidence-n-Rhythm...
That’s why I’m calling for run-run-run and dump it off quickly to the backs n "TE"s to build a legitimate rhythm n confidence in this “O”…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions
What if that rhythm was broken? What if it's not working?
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 16, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Fear Of Yesterday Is Haunting!!!....
Than only after establishing that as an identity should we go vertical and than with the play-action n pump-fake short to slow the “DL” pursuit and draw the attention of the "DB"s so a “WR” can get separation for a completed pass…
And this is something that needs to be practiced now instead of wasting the entire preseason throwing deep balls like we did last season…We knew we could run until it was time to do it and found out we could not and were stuck with airing passes off target in an inept “O” that could not heal…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
The passing attack will develop over time and as O is on the field more grinding out 3 yards here and five there.
Why would we try to be NO or Indi when we clearly are unique, or look much more like Balt or NYJ? The running game is as impressive as the passing game and has the demoralizing effect, eats up time (resting the D), we’ll have intimidation on both sides of the ball and (set up the pass – e.g. Sanchez, a marginal QB (ours are much better)). So, I hope we’ve learned from the past two preseasons and stop forcing the pass.
Please Hugh, don’t be Cable II; no more throws on 3rd and a foot or 4th and one.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 15, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
Work on it yes but don’t waist another preseason with that as the focus and don’t scrap a strong run for a weak pass on down-n-short…
by PantyRaider on Aug 15, 2010 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Who said scrap the run though? I never did( I have a feeling this has to do with what we were discussing).
Here’s what we want: We want a running attack, and an excellent defense. Our OL is built for run blocking, which is ideal for that situation. If we run the ball very successfully, with a few passing plays(like maybe 13-20 attempts. maybe less), and play great defense, that is US, and how our team should work.
But I have news for you. That situation is only our IDEAL situation. There will be times where our defense will not play as good as we want, and will give up more points/yards than we want. There WILL BE TIMES, where our running game WILL NOT BE EFFECTIVE.
We need to have our OL be more versatile. In the pre-season, let’s just have our OL pass block more than usual. let them develop that skill, IT’S ONLY PRE-SEASON! It will also develop their footwork, and against speedy and quick LBs who blitz us, and get to our QB in 3 seconds, will have a tougher time. IT MAKES SENSE!!!
Again, I AM NOT SAYING WE ABANDON OUR RUNNING GAME, OR GO FOR A PASSING ATTACK LIKE INDY AND NO!!!!!!!!!!!! Just that we need to have our OL try to develop some pass blocking, just so they will be more prepared when situations, like Grad against Pittsburgh last year(You know, WHERE WE NEEDED TO PASS THE BALL!), where passing the ball will be the difference between a W or a L.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 16, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I understand your position - very articulately stated and I like the ratio of run : pass that you've just given
All we had to go by was Thursday – projections were made from that data. In all probability, Hugh is insecure about our passing game and getting all the reps he can squeeze in now. Just saying that when regulation begins, we’d better know our limitations and strengths.
Knowing oneself is more important than knowing one’s enemy – Pseudo Lao damukong Tzu.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 16, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions
We know what our strength is. I hope Hue does too.
Knowing one’s weakness, and developing that weakness, is also important.
But yes, I agree that we should know our weaknesses and strengths, before the season begins, but I think we should use pre-season to improve, since it’s the only time where we play other teams.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 16, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
The Jets OL has I think 2 or 3 pro bowlers in it.
They are 10 times better run blockers, and guess what?
They can pass block good too!!!
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
by patriotguy2 on Aug 16, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions
I think you are spot on
We don’t have much time to get things right, but what they can do over the next four weeks is find out what we can do right, be productive and consistant with, and build from there. We don’t have 2 years for the team to find out where guys on the O-line would be best lined up, we have a month. We don’t have 4 years to develop DHB as a productive receiver, we have 4 weeks. Find something reliable and go with it until another area can be developed and lean behind.
Last year was much of the same, we spent too much time working on the passing game, that low and behold our running game struggled when the season started.
I'm ready for the Autumn Wind to blow strong once again.
by S Jay Bruin on Aug 16, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I want to see the rookies .................
steal Jobs away from the vets I like Campbell and Veldheer I think they will end up being something special !! Also I am not convinced that Bey is gonna pan out. I like (in order) Schillings <—needs to stay healthy, Murphy, Miller ,Watkins/Higgins and I havent seen Ford yet . Clearly our best reciever is our tight end but little Miller has some big – time concentration and great hands he may be the west coast Welker!
GO RAIDERS!!!!!!
Bongsmoke

by 























