Training Camp Battle: Third Running Back Position
We know that the Oakland Raiders are moving into the 2010 season with Michael Bush and Darren McFadden as their top running backs, but who will be the man behind them both? In training camp right now, there's a very good battle taking place between Michael Bennett and Rock Cartwright. Both have been performing well in training camp (then again, it is just training camp) despite harboring a different skill set each. So, assuming the team can only carry one, who should be kept and who should be told to look elsewhere? Let's take a closer look at Bennett and Cartwright with their past endeavors and divulge into their skill sets.

Michael Bennett has shown a great burst in training camp. [via cdn3.sbnation.com]
Starting alphabetically with Michael Bennett, this running back is a speed back who broke into the league in 2001 as a first-round pick out of the University of Wisconsin. In his second year, Bennett posted a career-high in yards (1,296), yards per carry (5.1) and touchdowns (5) with the Minnesota Vikings. Since then, though, Bennett's career has gone downhill. Injuries have played a role for sure. Since his breakout season in 2002, the former Badger has played just more than 11 games once and that was in 2005. In the last four years, Bennett has played for three different teams. Speed is Bennett's thing and he could be useful for a team that's looking for some of it out of the backfield. With McFadden also here, Bennett isn't a "need" since his skill set is in our backfield already.

Rock Cartwright was a captain in 2009. [via cdn3.sbnation.com]
Moving on, the well-rounded Rock Cartwright brings other things to the table. While we're on the topic of running backs, that's not the only backfield position the Raiders are having a battle for. Fullback, a position Cartwright is familiar with from his Washington Redskins days, could be somewhere we can utilize Cartwright for different looks or a change of pace. As a running back, Cartwright has carried the ball 60 times in a season just twice and that was in 2003 and 2009. In 2003, Cartwright averaged 3.9 yards per carry in games in which he carried the ball at least 10 times. That's the biggest sample size we have from Rock. Last season was Cartwright's best receiving the ball, though. In the 11 games he did catch a pass, he caught 27 of them and caught at least three in five. All in all, he hasn't performed that badly and could surprise some people with a chance.
When it comes to making a decision like this, any little thing helps to get a leg up on the competition. Special teams is what I think should get Cartwright over the top, particularly his ability to return kicks. Noticeably in training camp, Cartwright has shown impressive bursts on drills when it comes to kick returns. In 2006 and 2007, Cartwright was a fabulous returner which included him breaking a Redskin team record in return yardage. Although that was years ago and we do have Jacoby Ford now, depth can't hurt. I don't want to see guys like Gary Russell with the football in his hands ever again on returns or otherwise.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
4 times more carries last year with better results, more physical, love the name, younger ... Going with the Rock!
Ben? Hoss? Little Joe?, “Nope, just call me Rock, Rock Cartwright’s my handle.”
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
Ha I hadn't even made that connection.
I was too busy smelling what the Rock was cooking.
Life's a garden...dig it!
by Rich Langford on Aug 9, 2010 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions
lol
And Posey is having amother great game.
by JohnnyDangerously on Aug 10, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Great overview...
It seems like every year the Raiders come up with great camp depth at RB. I voted Cartwright because of his versatility. Like you said, his ability to provide some snaps at FB will be useful. Bennett definitely sounds like he has something left in the tank, though.
Life's a garden...dig it!
When did we drop Gary Russell? He's not on the roster or the transaction history - well,here's to better returns this season
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
Owner of the Jets says Revis resigning or even playing through his current contract unlikely.
Al Do It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How much can we dish out on a player right now? plus we must trade with them if we would want to get him.
The RaiderLaker
For the money Revis wants we could spend on Vincent Jackson and help ourselves more. Things have and haven't changed:
Our positions of need are still at OT but now, clearly, WR as well. No to Revis, I have changed my mind under altered conditions.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Are you serious?!?! This is legit now, when you did that one post it was super, super unlikely/unecessary.
Now the opportunity is really there… and you say no? With 2 shut down corners we would shut down the leagues’ passing game… think about it Sons.
The RaiderLaker
I have thought about it - long and hard - and the answer must be "no"... unless Al comes up with an infusion of cash
deals off Kelly and Routt, or sells another chunk of the team. The CB deficiency has dropped to ‘yellow’ status while WR has been elevated to ‘orange’ … OT remains at ‘red’. We must address our weakest links and maintain balance or we will be exploited despite all our positive strides.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
Agree totally. He may tear the locker room apart with that attitude he has. VJ first before Revis easily. Nnamdi is quiet and lets his play speak for him. Revis is another TO playing the opposite position.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 10, 2010 5:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Think about how much money you are going to spend on that kind of guy, and the fact that he's already acting like a "me first" guy.
and now think about our OL and WR situations. As far as I am concerned, those positions are my PRIMARY concerns.
Not to mention we were #7 in passing defense last year, so adding Revis is really unnecessary. Plus he ain’t much of a tackler.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
unless your being serious?
We can just run the ball, throw bubble screens to welker or edelman or tate or maroney or faulk.
Also, Not even Revis can defend welker. He tried, and failed. He can only defend WRs who are more speed and height like that are used as downfield threats Also, revis DID have hep from Kerry Rhodes on top…
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Are you forgetting about Death Ro? He'll totally eat macaroony alive.
Branch will also roam against the run and Huff will shut down Welker.
The RaiderLaker
Moss will get shut down, the other WR too, it gives full focus to go against run.
Hence, 9 guys defending the run, 2 CB’s defending 2 WR on islands easily.
The RaiderLaker
Back to Oakland. Our pass rush will be improved and with Revis - yes, we would add more pressure
on QBs. Perhaps, Al is awakened to this breach of the peace in NY and will ‘make his move’ (as doth the hungry leopard). The next few days will be thrilling to behold. Plus, the odds of acquiring an all-pro T are on level with Denver winning the SB, i.e. < 2%. So, if the purse is opened wide – I say go balls-out for Vincent Jackson first and, if that fails, and no other stellar receivers are available, only then make a play for Revis … who might decide to express his spite for the way he feels the Jets are treating him by coming to us for less money than he is now demanding.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Do you know if any OT are free agents next year?
Yes, back on the raiders.
The problem with getting jackson now, is that we are required to give up a 1st and 3rd.
I’d rather use those future picks to tell the truth.
I’d also rather save the money so we can lock up seymour for next year, and other players on our team that are worthy of getting a new deal, so we can keep them.
Decisions…
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
VJ
is proven and unfortunately the way we have developed our 1st rounders in the last while I would take him in exchange of a 1st and 3rd.
When you least expect it there I am waiting below to take you out......if your lucky.
by TheLyleAlzadoPunch on Aug 10, 2010 5:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Okay yeah. We were #6 in rushing last year. So that won't be effective I guess.
Also, You really think ONE guy can stop welker completely? And we usually one 3 WR sets with one TE either receiving or blocking, and 1 RB in the backfield.
So if you think that just 2 GUYS only defending, then your out of luck. Welker will easily burn whoever is covering him, and even if he somehow doesn’t, our 3rd WR, whther that by Edelman(aka mini welker) or Tate or our TE in Hernandez who looks to be the next Dallas Clark, can probably get open.
Nnamdi didn’t give moss any trouble last time we faced the raiders, but revis MIGHT, and asomgha against welker? I’m sorry, but I don’t think Asomugha is even quick enough to contain him, and welker is strong as hell, and many tried to press welker at the line of scrimmage. Not many knew what happened, because welker just got by them in a second.
Covering welker effectively will mean to have the MLB focus on him a bit more than usual, and maybe a safety to keep a small eye on him as well, because he is so deceptive.
That’s all I’ll say for now.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Truly, Welker is the only Patriot I would greet if we met on the street
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions
There's talks that he might play in the 1st season opener against the bengals.
He tore his acl in january. 7 months. The guy is a true warrior, and I would be happy if he was a raider.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Welker won't be the same after that injury so no...
There is a thing called Zone, as soon as he burns the primary guy guarding him, the second guy will rotate, then maybe even a third if he burns the second, and with two HoF CB’s it just becomes sad and Welker or whomever coming out of the backfield will get crippled and injured, Slot receivers, no name TE’s will get stomped (other than Welker TE).
Our Front four will stop the run by themselves and McClain will get bored, and yes Seymour and Houston will be great Patguy. Don’t sleep on Henderson or Kelly. The Pats blow.
The RaiderLaker
How is this then effective? You reason like one whose thoughts are imbalanced. - too much thinking about Revis?
as soon as he burns the primary guy guarding him, the second guy will rotate, then maybe even a third if he burns the second,
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Sometimes I don't make much sense. My primary objective was to piss off-
patguy, but damn I couldn’t bait him to get mad. He’s good, he’s really good…
The RaiderLaker
So would I and most everyone. I'm glad to hear you say that.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 9, 2010 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Raiders can't solve their defensive woes just by giving an excellent corner a TON of cash.
Our problems are not the secondary, so I say spend elsewhere.
I'm also a Raider Fan dammit!!! RAIDER NATION!!!!
Down with Big Brother!
Bennett is having a solid camp, but Cartwright for veteran leadership and versatility
We might need someone to play short yardage and pass catching FB like Russell used to. No room for Revis now. The OT or some wideout depth would be in effect.
"If your only ambition in life, is to be a better person; well, that's just the best ambition you can have..." Wayne "Rabbit" Bartholomew
i say bennet
simply because even though he is getting up in years, ive seen his play and like what i seen. he doesnt fumble for one, a hard runner like bush but is pretty quick like mcfadden so its like both rolled into one except not as good as either.
rock seems like he would be more of a good fullback to back up daniels IMO
Both are capable !!
We’re talking about the backup fullback position, right !!! Cartwright has all the tools, and reminds me of Frank Hawkins from back in the day!!! Bennett is the quickest of the two, who happens to remind of Chester Willis, again from back in the Day !!! Both decent hands, both decent blockers, with the edge going to Rock !!!! Truefully a toss up far as skill sets. Either, or !!! But here’s a twist for you. Where in the hell is LOUIS RANKIN ???? 2yrs ago, he ran better than D-Mac, Bush, & Fargas in the preseason. Now for the segwig, If you got any questions about Campbell not being The ONE !!! Take a look at the NFL Channel critique on the 09 Redskins tonite. They’re talking about their young wideouts, But guess who’s making the all the THROWS……….YUP, JASON CAMPBELL !!!!! And just take a look at his pocket awareness while you’re at it !!!
Louis Rankin was cut for some odd reason last year.
He was signed by Seattle and put up decent numbers when he was forced to start. I thought the team never should have resigned Fargas in the first place and he would have been a solid 3rd RB behind both McFadden and Bush. Also I voted for Rock just because of his versatility and its cool having a guy on the Raiders named Rock. Wow! We have a Rock Cartwright and a Swayze Waters on the roster currently. Pretty dope.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
Who is the 3rd string? Who cares? Who is going to be the starting blocking FB?
It will be interesting if the O-line plays different for their new QB but looking back that line of thought doesn’t hold up for Grad’s knees.
We have two good Tailbacks but a weak OL and no real blocking back to lead the way. How are these two backs going to get out of the backfield??? The opposing defense lines up 8 men in the box because we very little passing threat. Maybe DHB and Murphy start catching on which will force the defense to spread. We already have Miller double covered so that is a start.
Bennett
is my pick. largely to speed as he’s bringing explosion. Rock should be a passing down blocking/release FB. We should make room for Rock as a FB.
Sons,
Let’s talk about Revis. He’s getting too rich for the Jets. What would it take to deal for him and how do you pay him?
Villified for seeking this trade earlier, now that circumstances have changed - or, properly speaking - been exposed in the
ruthless light, I place our CB need at 3rd priority – with our dire OT need crying out in pitiful need like some neglected wet infant. After that, we need a stud, massive, fast, proven WR with the hands of a gentle dentist, namely, Vincent Jackson – my passion now burns for these two vital pieces to our incomplete roster.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Aug 10, 2010 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Gentle dentist
is still an oxymoron. No one has cried louder than me for an OT. I would easily give up 2011 3rd round now for a stud. TO was available the whole off season, for peanuts; Chaz is injury prone. Nick Miller better show up this year after taking a roster spot and not playing a down last year (I know, not his fault but still). We’re just too young at that position.
by raiders4liffe on Aug 10, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Rock
for 2 reasons, find Rock a bit more versitile, can play FB, returns, not quite as fast as Bennett but is a bruiser in that he is difficult to bring down. Honestly does not matter much to me here, more concerned w/ FB. Really hoping Alex Daniels’ learning curve is short and quick, this guy has heart and is a LOAD @ 6-4 275. Can’t seem to find his 40 time for quickness, but guessing he moves really well. Thursday cant get here fast enough.
NO MERCY!

by 































