Crossing That .500 Barrier
Feeling the positive vibrations of a win that elevated this team to .500, we are all ready for the next victims. Bring on the St. Louis Cardinals.
What's that? The Raiders just played St. Louis? No, no they just played Los Angeles. You know, the Rams.
The Rams are in St. Louis? So, you're telling me St. Louis has two teams and Los Angeles has zero? That's crazy. ...Oh they are in Arizona. Damn, this is confusing.
Who cares, location is not that important. What is important is shutting down the ever dangerous Cardinal, Albert Pujols. That guy is a beast.
What's that? Wrong sport. Ah hell, I am all confused. Let's try this again.
The Raiders travel to Arizona to take on the Cardinals in a battle for 2-1. With the Raiders next two games coming against the offensive juggernaut Texans and the stupid Chargers, 2-1 is a world away from 1-2.
Hope for a victory in this game can be found all over the place. Like, Dancing with the Stars. Kurt Warner has traded in his helmet for a ballroom gown. Which is almost as funny looking as Derek Anderson dressed like a clown in Warner's huge shoes.
It's not all good signs I am afraid. The Cardinals started off the season on a two game road trip, which makes this their home opener. After getting throttled 41-7 by the Falcons last week, I am sure the Cardinals are anxious to play in their familiar surroundings and get a fresh start.
This leads to the next sign. The blowout bounce back factor. The Cardinals have grown used to winning. Last year they did not suffer back-to-back losses. Unless the Cardinals are going to be a train wreck this year, that blowout will be a wakeup call. Ask Darnel Docket. Docket:
One thing I know about is fights. We're not where we think we are, so today was probably good for us. Everybody on this team can do a better job.
Head Coach Ken Wisenhut also knows a home opener against the Raiders is his a chance to get things righted. Wisenhut:
I know the perception out there right now is not the greatest, but listen - we're excited about showing you we can be a good football team, and that's what our focus is going to be.
Conversely, the Raiders haven't won back-to-back games since 200forever-ago. These are likely big factors with the betting public as the Raiders are getting 4-4.5 points with an over under between 39-40.
Of course, there are reasons the Cards looked horrible last week. They are kinda horrible. Still, both teams have suffered one blowout and both teams had close victories against the mighty Rams.
The Match-Ups:
These Are For The Birds:
Cardinals WRs vs. Raiders DBs
Larry Fitzgerald missed the end of pre-season with a sprained MCL and was less then a 100 percent in Week One. Reportedly, in Week Two, he was near or at 100 percent. I don't think I need to waste any superlatives on Larry's ability. Derek Anderson certainly knows. Fitz is second in the NFL with 27 passes thrown his direction. He has, however, only caught 10 of them.
Broken Record Alert! Put Nnam on the team's #1 WR please. I think all NFL fans want to see this. The best of the best head-to-head. The guy the QB always throws to vs. the QB no one throws at.
Heaven save the Raiders if they play any zones and expect Tyvon Branch to guard Fitz.
Fitzgerald is not alone. Steve Breaston is a solid #2 WR and he also has 10 catches. If the Raiders decide to move Nnam around or not, this is going to be the first real test for Stanford Routt 2.0.
No other Cardinals WR or TE has more than two receptions.
Cardinals Pass Rush vs. Raiders Pass Protection
I'm not going to lie. I'd put this match-up in favor of every other team in the NFL right now and maybe a couple of UFL teams. The Cardinals certainly have a decent pass rush.
They will be the first 3-4 team that the Raiders face. We will see how Langston Walker handles the speedier outside rushers, how Jared Veldheer handles some of the blitzes and how Mario Henderson can mess up this week. Also, not helping the blitz recognition potential, is the fact that I think it is highly unlikely Gallery plays.
Both of the Cardinals DE's, Cailis Campbell and Dockett, are able to put pressure on the QB as well as OLB's Clark Haggans and Joey Porter. The Cardinals are also not afraid to send in Adrian Wilson on Safety blitzes.
Killing Two Birds With One Stone:
Raiders Run O vs. Cardinals Run D
Don't look now, but the Raiders have a rushing offense. Michael Bush will likely be a game time decision and it would be nice, if for nothing else, than to take some of the burden off Darren McFadden. Let's hope McFadden is recovering well from his 30 carries. Last game McFadden played after getting 30 carries...oh wait, it's never happened before.
The Cardinals are giving up 153 yards a game rushing on 4.4 yards per carry. While the departure of ILB, Carlos Dansby, certainly accounts for some of the woes in the run game, Cardinals fans will be quick to tell you that, ILB Gerald Hayes currently occupying the PUP list, is a bigger loss in the run game.
Combine this with the fact that, the LB's aren't getting any help from the D-line and you have a team struggling to stop the run.
According to Football Outsiders, the Cards D-line is only stuffing 10 percent of the run plays, which ranks them 29th in the league. They are being exploited on outside runs, which could play right into McFadden's swift feet. Even more precisely FO ranks their D-line 31st to runs at or outside the right offensive tackle.
They have also been beat right up the middle, where they have Bryan Robinson sharing time with rookie Dan Williams at NT. Williams has apparently shown flashes of good play and rookie mistakes.
Raiders Pass Rush vs. Cardinals Pass Protection
The Cardinals are not happy with the play of their Tackles or their offensive line in general. Derek Anderson has been sacked four times and hit 13. The 13 hits are the fourth most in the league. This is no doubt attributing to his 66.8 QB rating. Well that and his lack of ability.
The Cardinal On The Raiders Shoulder (match-ups to keep an eye on)
Raiders WRs vs. Cardinals DBs
CB Dominick Rodgers-Cromartie is one of the best cover guys in the league. Much like the Raiders, the Cardinals don't typically have him shadow a particular WR. They are still in need of a solid #2 CB to pair with him. Then again, having SS Adrian Wilson at your back helps any CB.
Still, teams have been able to exploit the Cardinals pass defense with WR's. 60 percent of the Rams completions were to WR's and 57 percent of the Falcons completions were to WR's. The Raiders will need to keep DHB and Murph rolling.
Penalties
The Cardinals are making a run at the Raiders throne of most penalized team. They have amassed 20 penalties for 181 yards. Last week FS, Kerry Rhodes, earned a a quick trip to the showers with two personal foul penalties.
The Raiders have an impressive 22 penalties for a measly 167 yards.
How To Leave Happy
The Cardinals have big play ability. They have it at WR and RB. Tim Hightower broke off an 80-yard run last week and we all now how the Raiders like to watch speedy running backs blast through them. The Cardinals may or may not have the services of Beanie Wells next week. Wells is a big play threat running and catching. The Raiders need to make the Cardinals earn their yards.
With both teams struggles on the offensive line, protection will be key. If the Raiders can generate solid pressure with just the d-lineman this will help limit the exposure of the Raiders safeties to the Cards dangerous WR's.
If the Cardinals don't do a better job of stopping the run this week, none of this will matter. The Raiders need to keep that run game churning.
83 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
baby stepps
we beat the home opener streak.
Let’s focus on back to back.
Then we can focus on .500
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
by mikesd1981 on Sep 22, 2010 4:34 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Ditto!
Pardon the typical sports cliche’ BUT we do have to take it “one game at a time”.
And while I’m at it, we just need to “go out there and give 110% percent.”
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Raider fans copy & paste 130434106062 in Ebay!
Raider fans copy & paste 130434106062 in Ebay!
+1
And Posey is having amother great game.
You're the worst Al Capone
by JohnnyDangerously on Sep 22, 2010 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions
acually, we won back to back games last season...and the season before that.the
The only problem is, is that everytime we win a back to back ut puts us at .500 and we normally get blowed out the next then go on out usual tailspin of losing 4 in a row. That cant happen this year, im not happy with beating Arizona and hoping for a split between the Texans and SD. I want it all and we can have it all if we tighten up and play with pride and poise.
I want to be the modern day version of Super Mario Brothers!!! Dont care for *shrooms*, but would love to *get large* and *spit fire*...unless im constantly told "thanks, but your girl is in another castle". That would rate a 8.9 on the ole *Suck-ometer*!!!
by Kobe Won Kenobi on Sep 22, 2010 5:15 AM PDT reply actions
Last time they won back-to-back
was to close out the 08 season. You are right about the loss after 500 thing though. The last time the Raiders crossed that threshold was 2004. At 1-1 they narrowly lost to the Bills in 08.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Back-To-Back Wins
It has been rare we getting back-to-back wins and I don’t think we will get our first one right now this season. The Cardinals are coming off a lost to the Falcons and it was ugly like I am use to seeing us Raiders loose (remember last year’s game against the Giants?). I saw the game due to me living in the Atlanta area and I don’t think the Cardinals will be playing the same way against us especially at home. I know they are not scare of us because we are not one of those teams who scare the other team before hitting the field like back in the good ole days and are considered one of the bottom half teams in the league which is warranted. We just don’t have an identity or attitude right now.
We just don’t have an identity or attitude right now.
oh I dunno. A defensive player that body slams a WR (yeah yeah penalty I know, but still the drive he has). The potential of a QB that just brings a team alive. A HC that maybe isn’t afraid to go against the grain to win. I think we’re closer than you think.
Win, Lose, or Tie, Raiders til I die!
I can't put much stock in that Ro's bodyslam.
To be honest, I almost think less of him for that. I love Ro and I love the attitude. But Amendola is is about 5’9" 170lbs. I’m shorter than him and I can bodyslam Danny like that. When he does it to a 6’3" 230lbs WR, TE, or RB I’ll get excited. But I’ll hold off until then.
Either way, I have a hard time justifying freely giving up 15 yards and a 1st down so that you can try to prove that you’re a badass. That’s just stupid regardless of who the opponent is. The leader of the defense needs to be smarter than that. Thats worse than letting a guy run up the middle and over you for 15 yards.
by TexasRaider20 on Sep 22, 2010 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Our penalties move the ball for opponents. Last week St.L could move the ball the whole 2nd half with Zero non-penalty
1st downs; if it weren’t for Kelly’s PF, Ro’s Roughing, and Huff’s PI, the rams would have had 29 yards in total offense. Cable has got to be a better leader and impose discipline and the old pride & poise. Our only leaders are Richard and Bruce. The former also gets PF’s the latter draws them. The best tackle last week was San Quentin’s.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 7:00 AM PDT up reply actions
You are probably correct...
..in that I shouldn’t have given him leader credit yet. He hasn’t earned it. But there is no arguing that is the position he is slotted to fill. He should keep that mind and start conducting himself in that manner.
by TexasRaider20 on Sep 22, 2010 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Hey, you were at the game,
could you tell what Kelly’s PF was for?
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Didn't see it. Assumed head slap or heelpalm to groin
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Kill everyone
Ive got a short bald guy I work for that is an asshole to everyone he comes into contact with but noone will kick his ass because he’s so little, and you know what he’s never gonna change until someone does. So I dont care how little the opponent is I want The Raider’s to rip everyones head off they come in contact with and until they do that this team wont change.
by Andy Brummundt on Sep 22, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
This is a golden opportunity....
…for a half dozen sacks and a couple of INTs for the Oakland defense….if they choose to be aggressive.
The Raiders are not an elite team, nor do I believe that they are playing up to their potential for the talent they have. But this game is certainly winnable. Anderson is prone to mistakes…especially if pressured. But even Anderson can complete 50%+ if given time. Fitz can catch the majority of balls he can get at least one hand on and Breaston is faster than a lot of DBs. Man coverage and a lack of blitzing could spell a long day. The opposite could be very productive.
Jackson's play calling is improving, he's using Darren better but still could eliminate those wasted calls up the middle
with the WRs, he’s willing to send them in routes under 30 yards to compensate for the line and allow 3 instead of 5 step drops.
If we need to keep our FB in the backfield for passes, then so be it, 3 or 4 receivers is plenty for Grad and 2 or 3 is all Jason can handle anyway.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Is Bush officially back yet.
He’s big enough to hang back and help protect. If they get some protection and extend the field a bit, they can make use of him on some draws as well.
by TexasRaider20 on Sep 22, 2010 7:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Game time decision...
at least that is what I have been reading.
by BleedssilverandBlack on Sep 22, 2010 7:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Give Michael another week to heal for a few reasons: Darren is hot, keep going to him till he's not. Bush, who doesn't
fumble much (2 or 3 fumbles all last season) is at risk of turning it over with that cast on and we will need him against Houston whereas we can manage without him in Az.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm on board with that.
McFadden should be able help protect as well as run draws or delayed screens.
by TexasRaider20 on Sep 22, 2010 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Geezz dude, Grad is in like you hoped! No need to down talk Campbell any further.
I want to be the modern day version of Super Mario Brothers!!! Dont care for *shrooms*, but would love to *get large* and *spit fire*...unless im constantly told "thanks, but your girl is in another castle". That would rate a 8.9 on the ole *Suck-ometer*!!!
by Kobe Won Kenobi on Sep 22, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Just telling it like it is, dude
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
The Raiders have actually had success going up the middle this year.
It surprised me, but according to Football Outsiders they are ranked 4th in runs between the guards and at NFL.com I saw that their most runs of 10+ came between the Guards. They had 5.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Very interesting stats
It’s a nice change from last year where that was an area we had a lot of difficulty with McFadden especially.
You know what would make a good story? Something about a clown who make people happy, but inside he's real sad. Also, he has severe diarrhea.
by Buster Bluth on Sep 22, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Because both our QBs have gained yards on QB sneaks and on busted plays - not through RBs not between Guards
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions
The football outsider stat only includes RB carries.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Then I was mistaken about that and also about Darren's ability to succeed in the middle.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
If they block it, Darren will run through it.
Still, like you, I don’t recall them being most successful up the middle.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions
He ran the ball 30 times. He has 240 yards in two games this year.
Whatever he is doing, I’m loving it. He is only going to get better now that Gradkowski is the man!
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
the power running scheme is paying dividends vs. cables zone
by rodeosnake12 on Sep 22, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm so glad we're easing out of that miserable godforsaken abominable ZBS.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions
They are mixing it up like most teams do.
Last year all we did was run zone only. Only a few teams run pure power blocking such as San Diego.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
I thought I was seeing zone for the most part
while I watched the game. Your thoughts on which scheme is gaining the most yardage? I’m not sure my eyes are as discerning as other peoples’ based on what I’m seeing on this blog.
Don't shoot, I'm a man.
Well from the runs I saw he was doing well on the edge off-tackle.
A lot of those were seal off plays. The main difference in the running between the tackles with the power blocking is on the 2 or 3 yard gainers which used to be -1 yard losses or no gains when he was waiting for the blocks to develop. I think the combination of using both especially in the red zone is the best option as opposed to primarily one or the other.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
This is so intelligently obvious that I don't think it will happen. Noon, please bold it and enlarge the font - maybe it will register
Broken Record Alert! Put Nnam on the team’s #1 WR please. I think all NFL fans want to see this. The best of the best head-to-head. The guy the QB always throws to vs. the QB no one throws at.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
After the Arizona game
we will truly know who is currently running the Raider defense.
Your team is your child...You love it no matter what.
by TheRaiderWay on Sep 22, 2010 7:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Seems obvious to me too.
So why not do it? I’m not going to claim to be any smart than the DC. If so, I’d be in the league. So, why are they not doing it?
by TexasRaider20 on Sep 22, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously. If Fitz has a good day and I don’t see Nnam on him atleast once, I will shoot John Marshall.( Not literally, but he’s mincemeat in my mind).
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.
It's not Marshall's fault he doesn't move Nnamdi over.
The guy in the jumpsuit with the cane still has a big influence on everything Raider.
Cowards die many times before their deaths
The valiant never taste of death but once.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Julius Caesar
Good idea.
We shall not be ignored
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Great quote from Grad on in to the night
Gradkowski: You never know. I just have to be prepared and keep working like I’ve been. If my number gets called again, I’ll just come in there and try and do what I did the other night. The fans are awesome. The way that stadium was rocking the other day was unbelievable and I love those fans more than they even know.
In Bruce we trust
"We want to win. The Raider fans deserve it. The Raider players deserve it, even my organization deserves it. You have to win and you have to win with a vision for the Super Bowl. That's our passion here." - Al Davis
by Ozraider on Sep 22, 2010 8:59 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
His attitude is like a 7up
so refreshing it could make Brad Garrett chipper and David Spade nice.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions
In Bruce We Trust!!!!
Go raiders can’t wait to watch the next game!!!!
by americaneagle510 on Sep 22, 2010 9:51 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
crazy
Overall, the stadium was on point and the fans were amazing. We want to win and win now. I couldn’t handle another game where a QB, any QB, looks around after the game and acts like it’s not his fault we lost.
The second quarter proved that OL and QB needed to be addressed.
With all due respect to JC and his scripture reading before the game, what are you, a linebacker. You need to be reading the playbook, not praying. When he said that, I knew we were in trouble.
Is this what you are referring to?
http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?182106-Nov.-24-QB-Jason-Campbell
I always find a strong Bible verse that’s going to give me strength to go out and do what I need to do that day. I always ask Pastor Brett or someone that I know that can know how to give me good scripture to read for the upcoming game.
Jason Campbell sounded very uplifted in 2006.
by Spirals galore on Sep 22, 2010 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Grad just seems excited to play ball! i like that
I want to be the modern day version of Super Mario Brothers!!! Dont care for *shrooms*, but would love to *get large* and *spit fire*...unless im constantly told "thanks, but your girl is in another castle". That would rate a 8.9 on the ole *Suck-ometer*!!!
by Kobe Won Kenobi on Sep 22, 2010 9:57 AM PDT reply actions
Ill be at the game Sunday
Just graduated colloege and my wife gave tickets to the game. Ill be representign the 818 at the game.
+1
I’ll be there too! Gotta represent the AZ charter of the RAIDER NATION!!
"Cuz I'm a Raider, Oakland Raider, From the bay, to LA, to Las Vegas!" -Luniz
We're everywhere!! Thank you.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 24, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Thank you!!!!
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 24, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
None of you is going to kill my buzz
I’ll be at this game, and the only real matchup I fear is Breaston on Routt. It doesn’t bother as much as it would have late last season, and I think Routt is a better matchup, now. Routt has decent size and elite speed, so long as he stays with his fundamentals he can have a good game. Fitz on Routt or CJ scares the bejesus out of me, though.
If we keep running the quick hitch to DHB like we did in the second half, he will torch them. Rogers-Cromartie is a lot like his cousin, and I think he will miss a tackle on one of those, try to jump the route, etc making him susecptible to a hitch and go. LouMur will be solid, and I’ve got him pegged for a break out game this week. Wilson and Rhodes will alternate being obsessed with Zach Miller, and Murphy or DHB should draw some single coverage.
DMC should blow up again this week, as the Cards, even with Dansby had issues stopping the run and giving up big plays in the running game. That’s the risk you take with you blitz you safety as much as they do.
I was a big defender of Campbell, but I can’t argue the spark that Bruce provides. He needs to be the guy this week and beyond…
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
Breaston is weak. He has a very slim body. Routt matches up well with him. Both have speed.
Now if you put Routt on Fitz….. he’ll get destroyed.
The RaiderLaker
Routt
matches up well with just about any WR, physically, it’s the mental aspect of the game where he doesn’t measure up. Breaston is a good physical matchup, but if we lose him on play action or bootlegs like we did Washington and Clayton, it’s curtains.
No one here can argue Routt’s physical tools, what we’ve seen over and over again are mental breakdowns.
I’ll bet you they try to run Fitz and Breaston out of the slot about 10 times this game to isolate them on anyone but 21. If we don’t adjust to these formations or get in Banderson’s face, we’re fooked. Marshall will have to sack up and move Nnamdi around and send some blitz looks we haven’t shown. Even if Dick Seymour can’t go, I like our DL on their OL. Wimbley should get at least 2 bags off Levi Brown alone…Scott should have a field day as well. They’re tackles might be on par with ours from what I’ve seen, and I live in Phoneix, so I’ve seen em all.
we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!
by transparent58 on Sep 22, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I answered 0 on the poll question
Because Nnamdi won’t be shadowing their best WR. Davis won’t allow it.
I like the match ups
The strength of the Cardinals is obviously their passing offense, which is in disarray right now with Andersen at the helm, and their running game sputtering due to an unsettled OL. If we can bring pressure on Andersen, then it takes away the WR’s, to a point. It will be interesting to see if Arizona tries to use Patrick and Spach more to spark the offense, or if they are kept in to protect the QB.
I see this as a winnable game, but predict that penalties will strongly figure into it.
Failure builds character; success reveals it
Yep, that's what I meant
There will be penalties on both sides that will have a real factor in this game.
Sorry of that wasn’t clear…
Failure builds character; success reveals it
Just win baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do the damn thang against the Cards . Its a winnable game and from what I am hearing Super 5 will be behind center . Big game from Super 5 and the receivers , big game from our backs , kicker makes ALL his field goals , bend dont break D should be able to take this one down ,. As long as the O-line protects which they do well when G-rad is in the game ! GO RAIDERS!!!!!!
Bongsmoke
Besides
The strategy will be to get to DA, rush him, pressure him, throw him out of whack and force him to be unable to get the ball to the receivers, rather than stressing over tight coverage. Our pass rush is up to the task. Just have to watch out for Hightower breaking another long run.
Derrick Anderson has his 2nd best game of the season last year against us - so it's payback time
btw, he had only 3 good games last season.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions
trivia, Derek's best game was against the Bengals
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Holy cow, you made me join Silver and Black Pride to respond.
Cards fan here. thought I’d let you know I think this write up is really good. The points are balanced and fair. You’re right, our O line is a serious concern. Jagger Jaw’s comment on Breaston being weak I can’t agree with. He’s smaller but solid and one of the fastest guys on our team. He may suprise you.
Here’s to a great game this weekend and both teams getting through with no more injurys!
by Birdman from Mesa on Sep 22, 2010 9:56 PM PDT reply actions
Check out the new fan post. It emphasizes Derek Anderson as AZ weakness
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
by Sons-of-Blanda on Sep 22, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Welcome and now that you've joined, you know what they say
Once you go silver and black, you never go back.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 22, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I was talking from a physical standpont. Breaston is good and speedy. But against physical corners
like Revis or Nnamdi he will be destroyed. Our guy Routt matches up well with Breaston. It can go both ways that matchup. Either Breaston or Routt will have a big night. (Breaston with TD’s and good yardage, or Routt with a pic and makes life hell for Breaston) That is a good matchup, if the Cards want to win they better get Breaston going because we all know Fitzgerald won’t be a factor when Nnamdi is on him all day. (Fitz will get shut down)
:P
The RaiderLaker
Cards fan
Just a couple of things.
Some have mentioned how slight Breaston is, and he surely is and I’ve always thought that. But the guy is tough and never seems to take a huge hit. If the Cards have him running underneath stuff a lot with Fitz pulling coverage downfield, he should do some damage.
Our O-Line is not very good, but it seems to me that your D-Line is built more for pass rushing than run stopping, is that correct? If so, I think we’ll have some success running the ball. To flip that around, the Cards are missing their best LB, Gerald Hayes. He’s a very good run stopping LB’er, so with that said, you guys will probably be able to run as well. I would look for our D-Line to have a good game as they were horrible last week and didn’t play to their talent at all.
While this is his first year starting, Greg Toler has been impressive opposite Rodgers-Cromartie at CB. He’s going to be thrown at a lot because of Cromartie, but he’s a good one.
That’s it for me, lay into me if you’d like.
I agree with everything you wrote except the d-line thing.
I think they will be good at run stopping espescially as our rookie nose tackle progresses. He’s big and very athletic and showed some real flashes of potential in the preseason. He’s rotating in with Brian Robinson who we brought back to mentor him. It’s a work in progress but I think they will be very good. You’re absolutely right about us missing Hayes. He makes a big difference for us.
by Birdman from Mesa on Sep 23, 2010 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions
The Raiders D-line is very versatile
Now, they have been very very bad at stopping the run, but they have looked better this year. Rookie LaMarr Houston is starting and getting as many snaps as anyone at DE. He’s a big DE and more a run stopper than a pass rusher, although he can do both. The other two DE’s getting snaps are T. Scott and M. Shaughnessy, both are more pass rushers.
The Raiders have great depth at DT and they certainly have run stoppers. At this point in their careers John Henderson and T. Kelly are more run stoppers. Big Dick Seymour can dominate in both areas when he is on the field and motivated.
I have to admit, I have little feel for Toler. It’ll be fun to watch him match-up with the Raiders young WR’s now that the Raiders have a QB that can actually get them the ball.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 23, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Of course, there are reasons the Cards looked horrible last week. They are kinda horrible.
Pot.. meet Kettle… he’s black…
That's very potsist of you
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 23, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Raiders were pretty horrible week 1.
Does that same kettle – pot thing apply? One game may not be the best measure to judge a team… just sayin.
by Birdman from Mesa on Sep 23, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
You have to have to parties involved for that saying to work
Not to speak for G_M or anything, but I think you failed to grasp his meaning.
My profile pic is a Todd Marinovich painting.
by Rich Langford on Sep 23, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry, little obtuse there on my part!
Wanted to say thanks for the invite to the site this week. You guys have some great contributors over here. Good luck today, just not too much.
by Birdman from Mesa on Sep 26, 2010 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions

by 
































