Ask Battle Red Blog
Hello there, faithful Raiders fans. My name is Jordan and I hail from Battle Red Blog.
Consider this fan post as a Q&A about the Houston Texans. Feel free to leave any questions or commentaries below.
As Screwfish mentioned over at our blog, our teams seem to face each other every year now. As a result, we're becoming pretty familiar with each others strengths and weaknesses. But every year is different.
I caught a little bit of the Raiders-Patriots game last week and I was rooting for your beloved team to win. Even though it resulted in a loss, it was still a valiant effort. Run DMC is definitely one of the best running backs in the league so this match up scares the heck out of me. Denarius Moore is looking like a steal for y'all as well.
Good luck to y'all and let's hope for an injury-free game between our beloved teams. I truly believe that the Raiders are going to bounce back and win the AFC west. But not this week!
146 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Schaub was on and off last year. He seems to be playing more consistently this year.
Likewise, your defense seems much improved. What are your thoughts on these changes?
See below for Schuab
The defense improvement is for real, but by the end of the year will likely settle somewhere as mediocre instead of great. But going from historically bad to mediocre, especially when you have a top 5 offense, is a relief. All hail Wade Phillips!
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
oh and yes
you can run the ball on us. Mostly up the middle
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
I think they both run between the tackles quite well.
Run DMC will slash through them, Bush will smash through them, and hopefully Typhoon will dash through them.
by RaiderPsycho on Oct 4, 2011 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Woooohooooo! Can't wait to see him get some touches to see how he does!
I hope the Raiders don’t wait until either Run DMC or Bush get hurt. They should be giving him some real playing experience, especially with those gadget plays.
I feel like talking about Schuab
we think he is a top 10 QB, probably falls somewhere between 7-9. His strenth, USUALLY, is his accuracy and decesion making(except his one WTF pick a game). He is one of the most accurate passers in the league. His weakness, USUALLY, is the deep ball, he just doesn’t have a great arm. Our play action usually gets AJ open deep, but he has to come back on some balls usually.
This year? Flipped, its like Bizzaro Schuab. Overthrowing easy completions, or throwing at recievers feet, while simultaneously throwing some of the nicest deep balls I’ve seen from him.
Oh and he sucks at throwing a fade.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
I view him as higher than that...
The way I was breaking down QB play he maybe as high as top 6 right now. He could dip the next few weeks without Johnson. If he is who you think he is he won’t have a drop off he will still make it happen.
1)Manning
2)Brady
3)Brees
4)Rogers
5)Rivers
6)Hamburger
is about how I would rank it.
Cutler might be better. Going forward Stafford Freeman or Bradford could be better, but I would take schaub over those 3 at least for this year.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
Top nine have winning records right now after that there is a huge drop off
The 2 anomalies are Flaco and Rivers both at 3-1
I only look at who’s playing right now and what they are doing
Aaron Rodgers GNB 4 124.6 103 141 73.0 1325 331.3 9.4 12 2 7 46 1 0___4-0
Tom Brady NWE 4 111.3 109 163 66.9 1553 388.3 9.5 13 5 4 14 0 0 ______3-1
Eli Manning NYG 4 105.6 80 125 64.0 1066 266.5 8.5 8 2 11 84 2 1_______3-1
Matt Hasselbeck TEN 4 104.7 88 132 66.7 1152 288.0 8.7 8 3 4 30 2 1____3-1
Drew Brees NOR 4 102.9 120 174 69.0 1410 352.5 8.1 10 4 9 70 0 0_____3-1
Matt Schaub HOU 4 101.7 74 113 65.5 961 240.3 8.5 7 3 6 35 0 0________3-1
Matthew Stafford DET 4 100.3 100 161 62.1 1217 304.3 7.6 11 3 5 40 2 0__4-0
Alex Smith SFO 4 97.7 72 107 67.3 795 198.8 7.4 4 1 14 85 3 1__________3-1
Ryan Fitzpatrick BUF 4 96.9 92 145 63.4 1040 260.0 7.2 9 3 2 16 1 0 _____3-1
right?
He has been lucky so far the forty niners aren’t gonna continue this winning all year.
"Taco Joe - the beacon of optimism" TexansDC
THEREALALLENOU: "@Joeeatstacos... You're like the second testicle to my Tom green. I dont NEED you, but life is better when your around lol"
AllenOU is the Montgomery to my Patton
God blessed Texas, but he has forsaken the Texans
Samiam
loves passer rating as a metric for quarterbacks. He hates Jason Campbell because his Passer Rating is a mere 89 as opposed to great quarterbacks like Alex Smith and Ryan Fitzpatrick who are both consistent winners at the NFL level.
Fitz beat the pats with great QB play!
He also beat us with great QB play 5 TD’s in the last 5 possessions against us. He caught some breaks but he was pretty damn impressive. Good size quick release can make all the throws and good reads.
This season
2nd Half 123.6 43 62 69.4 468 7.5 6 0
Good when it’s tough I omitted the rating I’d trade Fist for JC all day long…
QB rating is a joke
Just watching that Colts-Bucs game was a slap in the face to all good quarterbacks. Painter having an unimpressive game, but throws a couple of passes throughout to Garcon who takes it all the way down the field. He gets credited with 2 TD passes and finishes with a 99.4, despite a 43.3 completion percentage (which should be the most important stat). Freeman finishes with a 94.7 because he only has 1 TD, and despite a 64.1 percentage. What a joke. They need to either do away with it already or recalculate it.
I think that's what ESPN is trying to do with that Total QBR
However that ain’t perfect either
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions
QBR is ridiculous
Since “clutch weight” is never defined along with a couple other “voodoo” statistics that they don’t give the formula for.
True but
None of those teams with the top 9 QBs (by rating) have league’s leading rusher either, or even one of the top 3. With McFadden and Bush running it in, Moore scoring on a reverse..is it really any wonder why Jason’s rating suffers? In any event, his completion percentage is 65.3
Ok ....but close
Bills have Fred Jackson #4
Texans Ben Tate #8
Eli has a nice tandem in Jacobs and Amhad Bradshaw
Good example. Nothing beats watching the game and making your own evaluation
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions
It's about winning and Harbaugh is doing a great job over there..
If they keep winning ist says something abot Smith. He is one of the bets Qb’s in the Red Zone in the NFL. I’m not a big fan of Alex Smith but he is winning..
So a few questions
1) How does your offense fair without Andre Johnson and Tate?
2) Schaub likes to hit Owen Daniels (5 times against Pit), how will your offense fair if the Raiders shut him down like they did to New England’s Rob Gronkowski (1 catch 15yrds)
3) How do you think you Oline fairs against our defenses front 4 rotation?
1)We still have one of the best running teams in football, so that still helps. WE don’t really have a great #2 reciever, but a lot of that comes from us putting a bigger focus on our TEs then most teams. Tates biggest role this year will be to spell arguably the best RB in football, Foster. Without him we don’t have anyone else really, and Foster could end up getting fatigued like he did agaisnt the steelers.
2)Run run run probably, its what we did against pit, but we also use our RBs a TON as reciever, and we have been using our HB a bunch too(converted TE Casey). Walter and JJ are no slouches at reciever either.
3)Our O-Line is really good, it should be a real battle down in the trenches.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
1. Losing Andre hurts, a lot. The rest of our WRs are trash, honestly. As for Tate, he’s a key player as well. While Arian carried the ball 30 times last game, and came out fine, Tate needs to take some carries from him. Tate is a much more explosive RB than Arian is, and gets good, tough yardage. He also has good speed. He’ll be a gametime decision.
2. Now that Andre is out, you guys don’t always have to commit a safety over the top of him, so OD can definitely be shut down in this game. Thankfully, we have the best TE group (maybe outside of NE) in the NFL. Joel Dreesen would start for quite a few teams in the league, and Garrett Graham is on his way to becoming an OD clone.
3. I’m just going to say it: We have the best OLine in the NFL. We are fantastic at protecting Schaub, and our run blocking is absolutely the best in the NFL. Our LT, Duane Brown, is playing like an All-Pro this year. Has faced Dwight Freeney, Jason Taylor, James Harrison, and Will Smith, and has yet to give up a sack. Funny thing about him is, his strength is run blocking, not protection. He could be a pro-bowler this year. Other than him, the rest of our OL is above average. They aren’t pro bowlers like Brown can be, but as a unit, they are fantastic.
We just destroyed the 2nd best defense in the league, so it’ll be hard to stop our running game.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 4, 2011 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I believe you. I saw Brown concuss Harrison and put him out for 3 weeks
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 4, 2011 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions
He didn't give Harrison a concussion. He broke his orbital bone

Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
I'm just kinda hoping that Goodell fines Harrison for the helmet to helmet shot that broke his eye
You’d think after all the fines he’s gotten, he’d learn how to avoid head to head contact by now.
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Calling the rest of our receivers trash is ridiculous.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
they're Solid
not game changers, but solid.
and the clouds opened up and God said "I Hate you Texans Fans."
Our Andre, who art from Heaven, hallowed by thy name.
Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Canton.
What would you call them then?
They’re not decent.
If Jacoby could be consistent, he’d be a tough guy to cover, but he’s not.
Walter is a great route runner and a good possession receiver, but we don’t know how he plays without AJ on the field. This isn’t the K-Dub from 3 years ago who was one of the better #2 WRs in the game. Besides, he has yet to impress this season.
I don’t have confidence in them, therefore I think they’re trash.
Prove me wrong.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 5, 2011 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Walter is a great route runner and a good possession receiver
How the hell does that equal trash? What the hell?
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
Having Andre Johnson kinda skews our perception of other WRs
Everything looks like trash compared to Andre, except for Calvin Johnson & Larry Fitzgerald
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions
must be it
we don’t have a real number 2 I guess, but its not like JJ and Walter would have trouble finding a job on another team if we cut them. Using the term trash just doesn’t make sense
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
Great spin - makes sense that way.
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 6, 2011 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Way to not finish my sentence...
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 6, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Also doesn't mean they're solid.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 6, 2011 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Why are the Texans 14th in sacks allowed percentage?
Slithering along the edge of a straight razor.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2011 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Because they've gone up against better pash rushers
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 8, 2011 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Few Answers
Great We Have Foster as well as a Good Scheme.
Daniels and Casey will not be denied, sorry.
This will decide the game, Trench Warfare.
Now a Few Questions?
How does your Oline fair against our front seven?
Reliant has been a diffecult place to play this year, you think it might effect Campbell?
Who is to watch out for when the Raiders need to make their comeback?
2 Defensive Scores are in the Karma Bag
"Wade aid has lean in it, just saying"
Wade Aid pass it around, Another Round?
More Answers
Our Oline is solid only giving up 2 sacks. All be it against a few weaker lines. We should fare well even if we keep Boss back to bolster our pass blocking. I’m not worried about that in a sense as we have shown against the Jets 3-4.
Campbell is a very reliable game manager and has showed he can play well in hostile environments. I don’t think it will effect Campbell all too much. What effects him the most is our run game stagnates and he has to throw for 300+ yds not a good omen for the Raiders.
We won’t need a comeback. Heh but in all seriousness if we do come into that situation. Look for our speedy WRs Ford and Moore (See Buffalo). As well as Run DMC on the edge. If he gets the edge, you guys will have a long day. Oh and the occasional reverse.
Your offense is explosive
but I think the only time you were really challenged was in New Orleans and you lost that one late. The colts are dead till manning returns, Miami is laughable, and the Steelers are fence sitting between full on suck, and mediocrity.
I feel the raiders have had a much tougher schedule than Houston (with denver being an exception), and could easily be a 3-1 team right now. I feel like this sundays game is gonna be a rumble for sure, epic, between two teams with similar weapons and scenarios.
Both of our division are up for grabs
Both of our teams are trying to prove themselves as playoff caliber
Both of our teams have Explosive Running backs & receivers
Both of our quarterbacks have, thus far, thrown for similar yardage and 3 picks
This game will be intense for sure
by Toolshed1485 on Oct 4, 2011 8:15 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Truthfully, that New Orleans game should never have been that close
Too many times the Texans settled for FGs instead of punching it in for TDs. The Texans kept that game too close & Drew Brees shredded our secondary (or more precisely just abused Kareem Jackson) in the fourth quarter. I hope we don’t see Kareem on the field at all until Vance Joseph & Wade Phillips fixes everything he does wrong. If the Raiders do try the spread the Texans out like the Saints did, I expect to see a lot of Brice McCain & Brandon Harris covering the slots in those situations. I don’t know how Wade plans on matching up the DBs on the Raiders WRs, but I probably expect to see Joseph & McCain covering Jacoby Ford & Denarius Moore
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Not very many.
I’d say twice, maybe three.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 4, 2011 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Then the similarities continue to stack up. I think JC has been sacked 3 times ...
And one of them was him and DMac tripping over one another, not a legit sack due to the line.
This is a good observation, really … these teams really do have a LOT in common right now. Esp. in this game, w/AJ not being ready to go … that really evens up the only distinct advantage you guys would’ve had coming in. We have a solid receiving corp, but no totally physical stud/go-to guy like AJ is for you.
Someone like an AJ is one of the four things this team is really lacking … the others being:
1) a decent veteran #2 corner,
2) at least one true 4-3 OLB with great lateral movement and tackling skills (neither Groves nor Wimbley are true OLB’s, they’re converted ‘tweener’ types who played DE and were regarded as sack specialists in college), and
3) A bad-ass run-stuffing strong safety who knows how to take proper angles and actually tackle. This role is currently very inadequately filled by one Tyvon Branch … who shows occasional flashes of great play but as a whole is overall lacking in many of these key areas.
TBH (and I’ll probably get roasted for saying this) even w/o AJ I don’t like the Raiders in this game. Our run defense has been nothing short of pathetic this season, and Foster by far the most talented back we’ll have faced thus far.
Combine Foster with a solid Texans o-line (who I’ve watched twice this year … Saints and Steelers games), and the fact that our d-line seems to be really performing well about 1 of every 4 quarters in each game so far this year (although the whole 2nd half of the Jets game they looked real good) … and to me it spells Foster probably gashing us for a buck seventy five and 2-3 td’s.
The fact that the Texans are basically playing lights-out in the 1st half also bodes somewhat poorly for us. If you guys come out firing on all cylinders and rack up a bunch of ground yardage and points early on, I could see our defense losing confidence quickly, esp. after how bad they got roasted last week against the Pats … and it turning into a very long day for them, since we’d then be forced to get away from the ground & pound that is this team’s only reliable road to victory.
Not saying we ’won’t win’ or anything of the sort … just, if I was laying my money down straight up, I’d have to bet on the Texans, in Texas, in this match-up.
I think basically one of two things happen in this game:
1) Texans take a large lead early, on the strength of Foster’s running & Raiders piss-poor rush defense. The Raiders then abandon the run, which leads to a lot of 3 & outs, the defense gets tired and discouraged, and Texans put up 200+ on the ground, resulting in TD after TD, and basically run away with the game, OR
2) Texans make a bunch of mistakes in the first half, fail to put up nearly as many points as they should, and they go in at the half only up by one score. Basically despite a large yardage advantage, they ‘let the Raiders hang around’. And unlike last week, their luck runs out because they’re not playing against a patchwork O-line, and the Raiders come out fired up for the 2nd half, and end up eeking out a W in a close game, due to some late-game passing heroics from Campbell (to either Ford, DMac, or Denarius Moore).
by Brett J Valjalo on Oct 5, 2011 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Nice post, rec'd.
I think both of your scenarios are equally realistic. It’s really frustrating at times watching this team make a bunch of small mistakes that have added up to a loss.
Of course it’s even more frustrating when they make a bunch of big mistakes that add up to a soul-destroying snatching of defeat from the jaws of victory.
Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
Never use a long word where a short one will do.
If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
Never use the passive where you can use the active.
Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
-Orwell, Politics and the English Language
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Oct 6, 2011 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions
second scenario spot on
replace ford with DHB though. lol
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
six times. And the Texans are 14th in sacks allowed percentage
Slithering along the edge of a straight razor.
by Rich Langford on Oct 7, 2011 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I think
if the Raiders commit to shutting down the run and stack the box, Schaub will have a field day and end up with a ton of passing yards. I’m not sure the Raiders defense is good enough to shut down the Texans offense even without Andre Johnson in the game, I think their best chance to win is if they try to make it a high scoring game and win in a shootout. This will be a big test for both of our teams, it will prove either that the Raiders can bounce back from getting walked all over by a superior offense or it will prove that the Texans can win games without their best offensive weapon. Hopefully it will be a fun to watch game with no injuries for either side.
I'm sorry.
I didn’t know that I wasn’t allowed to attach a picture of a Texans player in a fan post dedicated to answering your questions about the Houston Texans. Pardon my arrogance.
Capt. Nately: You're a shameful opportunist! What you don't understand is that it's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
Old man in whorehouse: You have it backwards. It's better to live on your feet than to die on your knees. I know.
-Catch 22-
No, no, no sir. What you did is fine. I'm just saying it could happen sir. Jinxing happens a lot... look at the Kansas City Chiefs.
But they actually overkilled it on our blog, you did not, but who knows, Foster may struggle but not the whole Texan team.
The RaiderLaker
Last year
the Chiefs fans were pretty bad before and during the game with the Texans.
by Bobbythegreat on Oct 5, 2011 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions
They talk serious bullshit and smack in here
But try and cover it couched in ‘discussion’….it’s farcical.
The cowards never started, the weak died along the way....
by BlackHeartSilverEyes on Oct 5, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd hate to see how they are now
They must be in a downward spiral of depression with how their season is going
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions
It would look a lot like our season last year.
Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
Never use a long word where a short one will do.
If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
Never use the passive where you can use the active.
Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
-Orwell, Politics and the English Language
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Oct 6, 2011 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Close to suicidal and outright schizophrenia....But hey, its the Queefs...
Its why i usually avoid the ‘ask the other team question stuff’….someone always makes a trolly sort of statement and as its our blog, you just have to retaliate.
Hope the Texans have a good season, but not at our expense!
The cowards never started, the weak died along the way....
by BlackHeartSilverEyes on Oct 6, 2011 4:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't worry, the Raiders can still run the table in the division without this win
Just take care of your business after this game, we need it more win the BE-SFs nipping at our heels & playing a Steelers team we just soften up for them
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Fosters numbers speak for themselves.
No boasting required.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
The thing that gets me is....
Yes we will be without Andre, but it will make this team so unprectiable. yes when andre was there teams cover him with a saftey over top, what does that safety have to do now? Let me just say this it should turn out to be a good game. Who is the back qb cause last time i think we took out campell and gradoksi guy came in and almost won.
No Laughing
Kyle Boller and Shane Lechler (Cause Pryor can’t practice yet). Heaven help us if JC goes down :P
by lakers007raiders on Oct 5, 2011 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Wait, Shane Lechler is the emergency QB???
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions
yep, I think it should be Dmac though or Michael Bush, (our other RB) Bush played QB in High School or something.
The RaiderLaker
I think I saw someone mention that Bush was questionable for this game
What injury did he have?
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions
It should be a shoot out
If Foster is actually healthy, they I don’t see the Raiders stopping him. The Raiders, at this point in the season, are pretty bad against the run. Our safeties, even when they realize to help, have been erractic at best. Beyond the D Line and Stanford Routt, the Raiders are very weak at this point. I think they can get better, hell, this might be the game but I won’t hold my breath. Our corners aren’t too bad, but do get beat on the occassion. I do however believe the Raiders offense can score. Campbell shouldn’t make the same mistakes he made in the Pats game. He can be very efficient with protection, and Moore and Hagen can catch the ball. Bey is very fast, and people seem to forget that Jacoby Ford can be very explosive when healthy. And McFadden is more than capable of taking over as well. Looking forward to the game, hope Johnson comes back soon for you guys, he really is pretty damn awesome.
by lakers007raiders on Oct 5, 2011 12:04 PM PDT reply actions
More like somebody is living within statistics and reality. I don’t give a shit what he would think about us? I care more about what Rolando and Big Sey think about him.
Please give a stat...
go on…anything that says McFadden is a better RB than Foster. He may be faster and more “explosive” but that doesn’t make someone better.
Just give it up
I doubt there is any convincing argument you can make that will sway Raider fans about McFadden. Same will be said about Foster to Texan fans. I think we both agree they are great backs and in the top 5 (however order we all choose to put them in) in the NFL. In 10 years, if both are still playing, we can measure them up. Foster popped up out of nowhere for those who don’t pay attention to the Texans. McFadden had injuries in his rookie season that slowed his growth. He came out last year and gave a glimpse on who he is. He is still fast, a great receiver, and has worked on running between the tackles. His power is no longer in question. Foster is no one hit wonder. He is a very talented back and anyone that doesn’t believe so will get ran over by that beast of a man. Championships and playoff yards matter the most, and neither guy has em yet. We shall see. For now, good luck Sunday cause it should be a good game, but not too much luck :)
by lakers007raiders on Oct 7, 2011 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Im sorry but Foster is not a better back than DMC
DMC is the total package… Strong, Fast as hell, and he is a great blocker.. Foster is probably in my top 5 though
Clippers own staples center!!!
by ClipperBEAST on Oct 5, 2011 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Foster is a great back, deserving of being considered one of the top two RBs in the NFL
He may not be as fast or strong as DMC, but he’s extremely elusive, has unbelievable field vision, great as a receiver out of the backfield, & is a great blocker as well. DMC may be finally coming into his own & may be up there in that discussion by mid season or season’s end, but Foster wasn’t the rushing champ for no reason last year
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not going to get into this debate because it will inevitably devolve into a pissing match.
I will say that Arian Foster is routinely underrated, even by other Texans fans. There were some seriously asking “Foster who?” when Ben Tate was putting up yards early in the season.
The game against the Steelers silenced all that. Foster doesn’t have 4.3 speed and he doesn’t run through people like Adrian Peterson, but there are very few backs in the league, if any, that are better at exploiting the smallest holes the defense gives him and making guys miss.
Foster led all RBs in broken tackles last season, and he led all RBs in receiving yards and was second in receptions. He’s also a strong blocker, as evidenced a few times in the Steelers game when he stonewalled (I believe it was) Troy Polamalu. When you think of the definition of a complete back, Arian Foster has to be one of the first examples that comes to mind.
Again, I’m not arguing one way or the other who is better, as that’s really an exercise in futility. I think Darren McFadden is a phenomenal talent and was really happy to see him finally break out last year, and I hope he continues his success. This post is mainly stating how criminally underrated Foster is by a lot of people outside (and a few people inside) Houston.
Carry on.
GET A SILK BAG FROM THE GRAVEYARD DUCK TO LIVE LONGER.
by Synchysi on Oct 6, 2011 5:20 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Now that I think of it, it was a lineman or linebacker Foster picked up on the play I'm thinking of.
Duane Brown (LT) let the inside rusher through to pick up Polamalu on the outside, and Foster stood up the inside rusher. I can’t think of who it was though.
I’ll also throw this out there, which actually works against my claim that Foster is a strong blocker (that was based mainly on the eye test):
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/06/17/2010-pass-blocking-efficiency-running-backs/
Last year was essentially Foster’s rookie year, so take that how you will. Knowing Gary Kubiak, he wouldn’t leave a back on the field to pass block that often if he thought that back was a poor blocker, though, especially with Derrick Ward on the roster (by the above metric, a much stronger blocker than Foster by default). This is the same coach that employs a #2 receiver more for his blocking skills than his receiving skills.
GET A SILK BAG FROM THE GRAVEYARD DUCK TO LIVE LONGER.
by Synchysi on Oct 6, 2011 5:51 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hence why Jacoby Jones is moving up to Andre's spot over Kevin Walter
Walter is a WR in name only. In essence, he’s an undersized TE
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions
By undersized though, I mean weight wise only
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Considering the fans of the raiders.
I think you could tell us Texans fan what you think of our comparing Foster to marcus allen.
Not just us, other media outlets have made that comparison as well
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions
If you review highlight reels of Marcus Allen and Foster
they flow (run) very much in the same style, although Arian is smart enough not to leave the ground.
I still remember watching Allen at USC when he became the first RB to ever rush for 2,000 yards. Then his time with the Raiders was incredible to watch.
Foster sure looks a lot like him in motion.
On the other hand, while we are making comparisons, I’d have to say DMC reminds me a lot like Earl Campbell…..fast, and hard hitting.
Irony.
Texans 2011 Defense is evolving into an epic force to be reckoned with. I dub thee "Bayou Blitz" !!
DMC reminds me of BO jackson.
I never really got to see marcus allen play that much. Good thing we got you tube so i can go look huh?
Allen just never looked as if he was trying...
He was totally fluid and had great hands, as he was a beautiul receiver.
Dont know what went down with him and Al, but remembering Allen as a Chief still makes me nauseated.
And to go into the HOF as one is blasphemy!
The cowards never started, the weak died along the way....
by BlackHeartSilverEyes on Oct 7, 2011 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions
the tyler rose?
not so sure…Campbell was a strange hybrid we’ve never seen before and Bo was the closest since…a monster power runner that once he took off had incredible speed…and though I haven’t seen Foster all that much, I would be inclined to compare him to Allen with an asterisk…need more data….
Crush your enemies...see them driven before you..and enjoy the lamentation of their women
Christian Okoye would like to have a word with you
As for more data on Foster, here’s a flashback
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92clos5OGg0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJNW-ValKvQ
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 7, 2011 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I think they're even.
But I see where you’re coming from. Oakland’s offensive line isn’t quite as good as ours, so I’ll give DMC credit there.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Oct 5, 2011 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
"Oakland’s offensive line"
I think it is, our line has only allowed 2-3 sacks(one of them was when Campbell and McFadden tripped each other up) and have paved the way for the leagues leading rusher.
by RyanTheRaider on Oct 5, 2011 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions
According to FO
Oakland’s o-line has the edge in pass protection but Houston’s is better at run blocking. Take it for what it’s worth.
Also, our d-line is the worst in the league at stopping the run but fourth best in the league at getting to the quarterback. Not coincidentally, 83% of running plays against our d are up the middle, into the soft, nougaty center of our d (also known as Shaun Cody). And we are the best in the league at stopping runs towards RDE. You know, where our useless-first-overall-draft-pick-that-should-have-been-Reggie-Bush plays.
Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
Never use a long word where a short one will do.
If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
Never use the passive where you can use the active.
Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
-Orwell, Politics and the English Language
www.battleredblog.com
by tehGrindCrusher on Oct 6, 2011 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions
based on the 4 games played this year maybe
we’ll see at the end of the year. Going offf last year Foster is the best back in football.
Watch me all in flames, on a butterfly I ride
So we're anointing him as a better rusher after 2 bad seasons, one decent season, and 4 great games?
Foster is a slippery, extremely solid runner and probably one of the two or three best in the league. Just because McFadden has looked good in 4 games doesn’t outweigh that. By the way, in the one game Foster’s been healthy, all he did was be the AFC Offensive Player of the Week with over 150 yards rushing and a TD against the Steelers. Sorry buddy, DMC is not better than Foster.
by Patrick Harrel on Oct 6, 2011 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Sigh...
2 bad seasons with injuries? Forgot to put that in there.
And a decent season is: 13 games with 1157 yds 5.2 avg 7 tds and 503 yds receiving… I think that’s pretty damn good. But yeah decent…
When Arian played all 16 and rushed for 1600…. hmmmm
4 stellar games is more like it.
By the way in the 4 games DMC has been perfect he’s just the league leading rusher. Nothing too big right?
I don't think many Texans fans say Arian is better,
but we are not going to allow someone to say Run DMC is better.
A little bit of homerism, and a little bit of “wait and see”.
It’s mostly homerism, because of course we are going to believe that Arian is the shiznit.
Now their is one thing Arian has on RUN DMC, and that is his poetry. :)
.................
we could all get to be homer re comparing DMac and Foster
the fact is McFaddens first 2 seasons were injury plagued but last year was more than “decent”…again, I know Foster via rep and stats, but not from watching him. What I have seen when I have is a top 5 RB in the league. All of that being said, DMac Is leading the NFL in rushing AT THIS POINT.
Crush your enemies...see them driven before you..and enjoy the lamentation of their women
I don't think Foster will be a threat to elad the league in rushing this year
because he missed 2.5 games.
I don’t think this game will come down to whose running game is better. There are several other advantages the Texans have that should decide the game in our favor (better passing game, even without Andre, and a pass D that although it has weaknesses will be a tough match up for JC, plus a rowdy crowd with the kind of excitement I’ve never seen in this city).
As far as Foster, he’s likely to take on a Matt Forte type role in this offense while ’Dre is out. The funny thing is that out of our entire passing offense, the WRs are probably the least threatening to you. Owen Daniels, Arian Foster and James Casey are probably going to equate to more passing yards than Jacoby Jones and Kevin Walter.
Arian has led the NFL in rushing.
Until McFadden accomplishes that, and I believe he has the talent to do so, Foster remains ahead of him in the who is better game IMHO.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
by TexansForever on Oct 9, 2011 5:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Pretty good
he is tied for 5th in the league with 4 sacks and he has a forced fumble, every game it seems like he is getting more and more comfortable standing up.
by Bobbythegreat on Oct 5, 2011 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Among those he's tied with is Texans DE Antonio Smith
Who’s been beastly in Wade’s 3-4 defense
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 5, 2011 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions
This is another team we seem to match up badly against.
Houston & Foster owned us last year & he only played a half. Be honest & admit it wasn’t as close as the score indicated. It was a dominant performance in Oakland AND WE HAD NMAMDI & ANDRE JOHNSON DIDN’T PLAY IN THAT 1 EITHER! Also Gronkowski wasn’t shut down last week. He was only asked to block for the running game more than usual & we got gashed by a no-name from LSU for 9.7 ypc. This team is almost going to have to ask JC to play near perfect as well as ask for a perfect or nearly perfectly called as well as executed game by Hue & the offense to keep Houston’s offense off the field. Also we cannot let Jacoby Jones get loose in the return game because then if he breaks a couple then you can chalk up 2-3 for Oakland heading into Week 6.
Trust No One
Studies show stress can kill you, but don't worry about it.
Houston
Has been solid at home, the pass rush in particular. Not to mention the running game
2 Defensive Scores are in the Karma Bag
"Wade aid has lean in it, just saying"
A comparison between this year and last from our perspective.
Texans:
Andre Johnson – was out then and now (no change)
Duane Brown – was out last year, having an All Pro (James Harrison killing) season
Conner Barwin – was out last year, revving up big now
Demeco Ryans- was out last year, slow start this year but making key tackles
Brian Cushing – was out last year, leading the team in tackles
JJ Watt – rookie having a DROY contending season, commanding double teams
Jonathan Joseph – Huge FA pickup trending to a career high performance
Daniel Manning – returns kicks and great in safety coverage and run defense
Jason Allen – replaced the parking cone Kareem Jackson who was in his fourth career game vs Raiders last season, positive FA upgrade so far
Wade Phillips – installed far better defensive schemes compared to the embarrassment of Frank Bush’s mess last year
Raiders:
Nnamdi Asomugha – was there last year, gone this year
Home advantage – was Oakland last year, in Houston this year
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
by TexansForever on Oct 9, 2011 5:31 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Losing AJ hurts but people outside of Houston probably don't realize how his role has become less critical in the last two years.
The addition of James Casey and Arian foster has led to our offense being less reliant on AJ.
Now we are still a MUCH better team with him on the field, but without him we are also very capable of putting up 30 points. We are fortunate to have a lot of explosive skilll players and our tendency to go with two te formations reduces reliance on the wideouts.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
Probably not
You’d likely be better off with Jacoby Jones, but I’d go with neither unless it is a 12 team league with an extra flex spot. Our WRs are just not that likely to have very big games, though Jacoby may be good for a touchdown.
I’d expect Owen Daniels to really shine in this game, he’s the go to behind Andre Johnson.
Without AJ, I'd say the Texans receivers become similar to the Saints
Plenty of pretty good people with no way in hell to predict who’s going to get the ball on any given day.
I mean this in terms of fantasy value
I’d give the Saints’ #2 and below receivers the edge on the Texans.
No way. Texans #2 and #3's don't have the hands or speed that the Saints guys have.
Jacoby may be fast, but he has no hands, and Walters may be pretty steady in the catching department, but he has no speed to get separation.
Read above.
You can’t predict which of the Saints’ receivers is going to get the yards/catches/etc. from game to game. With AJ out of the picture, I view the Texans’ receivers the same way.
Only if blocks are part or your fantasy stats
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Oct 6, 2011 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow, it does.
It makes a rec rare though. It’s kind of like inflation. It takes three at BRB but you see a hell of a lot more rec’s there than you probably see here.
.................
by Schlauton on Oct 7, 2011 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
We're discriminating with our rec's here. It's really the opposite of inflation - a dollar for a day's work mentality (it's congruent with Oakland's economy)
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 7, 2011 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Good game, Texans
The tough struggle throughout. That’s quite a pass rush you’ve got there, in particular. Who’d have thought this game would turn into a defensive slug fest. GL vs. Baltimore.
Fun game
Great play from your teams D. Didn’t think you could shut down DMC and ya did. And that pass rush, the NFL better watch out. What it came down to is who made the least bone headed mistakes. The Raider penalties nearly cost this team the game, then again your penalties definitely hurt you guys. Schaub made a bad play, but in the end you guys really missed Andre Johnson. Your receivers were average at best but those TE’s can catch. Good luck going forward. You guys are a good team now, made much better with Johnson and Mario Williams later.
by lakers007raiders on Oct 9, 2011 5:30 PM PDT reply actions
Good game, congrats to the Raiders
Our defense did enough to win for the Texans,
but our offense and special teams were out coached and out played on the field. Good win and well earned by you guys. Good luck on the rest of the season. The team looks pretty solid for a fun year.
Texans 2011 Defense is evolving into an epic force to be reckoned with. I dub thee "Bayou Blitz" !!
Whose dropped Schaub's pass in the 4th? He threw against our (so called) OLB and just dropped it with nobody around him
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 9, 2011 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Lawerence Vickers I believe is the one you are talking about.
The one that would have gone for the TD?
Anyways, good game. This game literally came down two things. The tipped interception and the blocked punt. If neither of those things had happened there would be 6 points off the board. Oh well, you guys won fair and square, and now Mario may be gone for the year……just to ice the cake I guess.
.................
Probably more plays than those determined the game ... it was so close ... appropriately Classic "Just Win, Baby" game
S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I made a trade for Seymour. ..I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/2011]
"I love to win, even against my daughters, I want to win" Hue "Action" Jackson 8/19/11
by Sons-of-Blanda on Oct 10, 2011 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions

by 

































