Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

Will the Oakland Raiders Vertical Attack Work With Jason Campbell?

It's no secret that Al Davis wants his Oakland Raiders to throw the ball deep. The ability to chuck it deep is the reason commonly mentioned as why Davis preferred Jason Campbell over Bruce Gradkowski. Well, if Jason Campbell is good at throwing the deep ball he is going to have to prove it in 2011, because he was off the mark in 2010.

Pro Football Focus posted a statistical look at deep balls thrown by all QBs in 2010. They counted any pass traveling more than 20 yards downfield in the air as being a deep pass. Every QB with more than 30 deeps passes qualified for the list. Bruce Gradkowski did not qualify.

15.5 percent of all of Jason Campbell's throws were of the deep variety. That was the sixth highest percentage in the league. Campbell complete on 14 of 51 deep passes—that is good for 27.45 completion percentage, and that placed him 27th out of 31 in deep pass completion percentage.

Those are not encouraging numbers. Even more discouraging is the fact that six of his 51 attempts were picked off. That means he completed almost half as many deep passes to the other team as he did his own team. Campbell had the third highest INT percentage on deep throws of all the QBs on this list.

Like any statistic there are all kinds of factors that can skew these numbers. For instance, few QBs were throwing deep with less pass protection than Jason Campbell. Also, Campbell was not exactly blessed with receivers that were going up and making plays for him in the deep game. Jacoby Ford made a few to remind us all that receivers can do it, but that was about it. Then, of course, there is a difference between a 21-yard post and a 50 yard streak, and when the Raiders go deep they really go deep.

So, throw all of these things together and you will come to the unavoidable conclusion is that not only Jason Campbell, but the entire offense, needs to improve at the vertical passing attack that is undoubtedly going to be a staple of the offense.

Poll
Who or what is most at fault for the Raiders poor deep passing stats?
Jason Campbell
43 votes
the pass protection
290 votes
the wide receivers
173 votes
the offensive system
46 votes

552 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Its the line

it doesn’t give the receivers enough time to get open and it doesn’t give Campbell enough time to find them and get a good pass off.

by RyanTheRaider on May 10, 2011 2:45 PM PDT reply actions  

This is a tough poll question!

I picked Campbell, but I think it’s pretty much a tie with him, blocking and the wrs. I went with Campbell, because he can and has thrown nice deep passes, but he is too inconsistent with his accuracy, and until that improves the other two aren’t going to matter much.

I'm a freaky streaker like Winnie the Pooh—T-shirt, no pants and I dance the boog-a-loo

by Rich Langford on May 10, 2011 2:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I think it's definitely a combo of all four

But Campbell hasn’t proved he can thrown a good accurate deep ball with any consistency

by Raaddad on May 10, 2011 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad you found your own question insightful

Hahaha

I know absolutely nothing about this guy but if he is fast I say sign him up.
Long live Al

I think it's about time we all just agreed that NaS is the greatest of all-time.

by Ozraider on May 10, 2011 3:32 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Shouldn't you be busy putting some shrimp on the barbie?

I am merely a messenger to the voices in my head, and I am often surprised at what they have to say. I won’t tell you what they are saying about you right now.

I'm a freaky streaker like Winnie the Pooh—T-shirt, no pants and I dance the boog-a-loo

by Rich Langford on May 10, 2011 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I understand

It would seem that your personalities are somewhat more at peace with the fact they are actually the same person based on the fact that they no longer feel the need to post on separate profiles.

Glad to see you are making progress ;)

I know absolutely nothing about this guy but if he is fast I say sign him up.
Long live Al

I think it's about time we all just agreed that NaS is the greatest of all-time.

by Ozraider on May 10, 2011 5:04 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

"Too Late -n- Off Target" Is His Problem In Gametime...

He can do it if he doesn’t hesitate which was few and far between…Consistently he waits too long and throws at where the “WR” was thus short…

I Think when he 1st see’s the receiver he calculates where he will be and what spot to throw to…But now he hesitates…Than when he throws it’s to the spot he calculated earlier but now that’s short and the "DB"s have had time to recover and make a play on the ball…

The look on his face just kills me too…It’s like "Duh!!…I mean STUPID…Can he shake that loose a little…Show some emotion out there and act like your alive…

by PantyRaider on May 10, 2011 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

The WR corps is an embarrassment

The numbers they posted, as a group and individually, with the exception of Ford, are pathetic. No, it didn’t help that the OL is not that good, and that Campbell is often forced to throw early or on the move, or both, but the numbers from the WR corps have been shoddy at best for years.

Too bad that the position coach seems to be firmly entrenched when his players, compared to other NFL starters, suck wind regularly.

Failure builds character; success reveals it

by signcut on May 10, 2011 3:07 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm giving Jason credit for our excellent short passing stats and credit for our bad deep passing stats

Campbell doesn’t like to throw the deep ball for a good reason, he never has been able to throw the deep ball; he knows it and trembles.

S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I did the (2010) draft. ... I made a trade for Seymour. Gave up the first-rounder this year. I could tell you why. You may not think it was a good trade. I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/1911]

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 10, 2011 3:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Campbell can throw the deep ball.

He has the arm for it. He just gets scared of doing so too quickly, which is the biggest flaw in his game.

Someday you will find me, caught beneath the landslide, in a champagne supernova in the sky.
This day will be when the Raiders win a Super Bowl in my lifetime.

Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/_SLS_

by Screwfish on May 10, 2011 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

He can throw the ball far and wide, yes, he has the arm but he has never shown me deep accuracy - neither here or in Wash.

S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I did the (2010) draft. ... I made a trade for Seymour. Gave up the first-rounder this year. I could tell you why. You may not think it was a good trade. I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/1911]

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 10, 2011 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I blame the offensive system

The straight 7 step drop-backs, the lack of play action, lack of investment (on the whole, not so much lately) in offensive line depth, depending on inexperienced or inconsistant recievers, and a lot of turnover in the coaching staffs. It adds up, and the deep throw requires all of those areas to work well together to make it work.

"I’m back to my first love – the Oakland Raiders and working with the Offensive Line. I’m a Raider for life." -- Steve Wisniewski

by S Jay Bruin on May 10, 2011 3:29 PM PDT reply actions  

I think the shiftiness is a real team effort

But I have to blame the receivers more than anything as u remember many more times where nobody was open downfield more than I remember wide open receivers streaking down the sideline and JC missing them.

I know absolutely nothing about this guy but if he is fast I say sign him up.
Long live Al

I think it's about time we all just agreed that NaS is the greatest of all-time.

by Ozraider on May 10, 2011 3:30 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I Can Still See "WR"s All Alone And NO Attempt To Get Them The Ball...

True…Many times the "WR"s are going to be covered but more often than not the double was on Zack or “D-Mac” and NOT a “WR”…A good arm has the ability to get that ball in there on target on time in a spot where only the receiver has an opportunity to get it…I didn’t see “JC” doing that but many other "QB"s we faced did it to us…

by PantyRaider on May 10, 2011 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree with this either he definitely played it too safe on many occasions

I think some stability, another year in the same system for the first time in his career and coaches he knows will help in this area and I expect big improvement.

I know absolutely nothing about this guy but if he is fast I say sign him up.
Long live Al

I think it's about time we all just agreed that NaS is the greatest of all-time.

by Ozraider on May 11, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

I give Campbell most of the blame.

I can only remember a few deep balls being caught by Ford in one game and those passes were terrible but great catches by Ford. They should have been picked off.

by Captain Chaos on May 10, 2011 3:51 PM PDT reply actions  

It's mostly Campbell's fault, with some going to the O-line

Campbell is not making the reads and releasing the ball quickly enough, when you compare his numbers to Grads especially on the deep ball it’s clear. If Grad can throw it deep with success and Campbell can’t how can the be the receivers, the system or the line. Now I will say that our O-line could use an upgrade in pass protection they allowed both Campbell and Grad to get hurt, but in an Apples to Apples comparison Jason Campbell is not the QB that Grad is and that is the issue. We need a QB that can deliver the ball quickly and not get flustered when first two options are not there…..just me two cents …..GO RAIDERS

member of the Raider Nation since 1968......(Heidi Game!)

by TheAutumWind on May 10, 2011 4:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Don't really see it in the numbers

Campbell has not only a higher completion percentage (59/53), but also a higher average yardage per pass play (7.3/6.7). Now, I can understand a lower completion percentage, but a lower average as well? Those two combined don’t seem to support your contention.

I know everyone has their own preferences, but I don’t see where Gradkowski is so much better than Campbell. He does have one trait that I ‘d like to see more of in Campbell, which is decisiveness, but he also chucks up a lot of balls for grabs, with 7 INT’s in less than half the attempts of Campbell, who had 8.

I still put a lot of this on the WR corps; when your top two WR’s have a grand total of 66 combined receptions, that’s just plain pathetic. When four of the top seven receivers on your team are the TE, RB1, FB, and RB2, that’s even worse.

Sure there’s talent, but precious little production. Kinda like ‘playing well enough to win’, but losing…

Failure builds character; success reveals it

by signcut on May 10, 2011 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

well I stand corrected

although I believe Gradkowski’s stats were skewed a bit the last two games he played hurt, but even if you break out the long-ball stats his were about the same as Campbell’s. So the answer is that probably neither are the answer…

member of the Raider Nation since 1968......(Heidi Game!)

by TheAutumWind on May 10, 2011 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

They Won The "SB" 84 -n- If You Look This Was The Trend Season After Season...

32 Marcus Allen 64/758yds 5 TDs
46 Todd Christensen 80/1007yds 7 TDs
87 Dave Casper 4/29yds 2 TDs
33 Kenny King 14/99yds
27 Frank Hawkins 7/51yds

"WR"s…
80 Malcolm Barnwell 45/851yds 2 TDs
21 Cliff Branch 27/401yds
85 Dokie Williams 22/509yds 4 TDs

169/1944yds 14 TDs receiving for the "TE"s/"RB"s/"FB"s PLUS their Rushing #’s….

94/1761yds 6 TDs for the "WR"s combined….

by PantyRaider on May 10, 2011 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pretty simple, really

When you have a top defense, one of the top 5 in the league, you can get by with an average offense, which is what the ‘84 team had; the offense was consistently ranked in the middle of the pack in almost every category. Even so, Dokie Williams(!) had a better season statistically than any one of our WR’s did last year, with his 22/509/4: with about half of the receptions, almost as many yards and twice the TD’s than last year’s WR leader, Murphy, who had 41/609/2. When Dokie Williams is better than anyone you have on your roster, there are questions to be asked…

Yes, we can run the ball (#2 in the league), but we can’t throw worth a crap (23rd). Running teams don’t generally win the Super Bowl anymore, and if they make deep runs in the playoffs, it has to be with a strong defense (Jets). Right now, we don’t have the WR’s to keep opposing teams from stacking the box, and we also are still trying to build the defense (29th against the run).

Not even getting into the defense, part and parcel of the passing game is the WR’s: injuries, route running issues, dropped passes; there may be a reason that Campbell doesn’t look to them all that often. Ford seemed to be changing that somewhat, but who knows what will happen with him this year? I remember how everyone also thought that Murphy was going to just get better after a solid rookie season, and that turned out to not be the case (although I lay plenty of blame for that at Lal’s feet). Counting on progress at a position where it has not been happening for years is not a expectation that I’m confortable with.

Bottom line, though, is that this team is not the ‘84 team, and can’t expect to more or less run to the Super Bowl, or close to it. Passing teams, or with at least a balanced offense, are where the power in the league is now.

Failure builds character; success reveals it

by signcut on May 11, 2011 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Plunkett Was Throwing That Football In "84"...

If we have a “QB” that can deliver the ball down field the "DB"s will have to respect it and there won’t be anymore 7-8 man fronts…But “JC” was also missing his "RB"s n "TE"s…Off target off time…Late and short…If we get that aspect under control this “O” will explode and there is no reason for us missing the "PO"s last season or this one…

The “QB” s were thee in “84” but the “TE” n “RB” were the leading receivers…Don’t look now but “MrD” is rebuilding this team on that same format…

by PantyRaider on May 11, 2011 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think you're going on perception rather than numbers

All told, Campbell completed passes to the TE’s and RB’s at a 72% clip (Miller, 60/86; McFadden, 47/61; Reece, 25/43; Bush, 18/19; and Bennett 2/2; total 152/211), as opposed to a composite 49% to WR’s (Murphy, 41/74; DHB, 26/62; Ford, 25/51; Higgins, 10/29; Schilens, 5/4; Miller, 3/4; total 110/224).

Part of that is that he was able to get rid of the ball before the OL was beaten yet again, and part of that is that the WR corps simply isn’t that good, production-wise. There may be talent, but who cares? Production is what wins games, and our WR’s have not helped in that regard much, if at all.

Failure builds character; success reveals it

by signcut on May 16, 2011 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd say it's probably a tie between JC and O-line

but I voted for the O-line because it needs the most help, and until it’s shored up we won’t know for sure if Campbell is trembling about being crushed or about his deep ball accuracy. The receivers where open deep more times than not and I saw many balls under and over thrown more than I saw blatant drops by the wide outs. Most of the WR drops were inside 20 yards.

"Now I know what your thinking, did he fire six shots or only five. Ive forgotten myself in all this excitement, but being that this is the 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and could blow your head clean off, you have to ask your question. Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk!"
Dirty Harry Callahan

by rambis64 on May 10, 2011 4:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Not surprised the PASS BLOCKING leads the poll so far...

But I consider the protection equal parts line, WR, and JC, because if the wideouts were even a semblance of a corps, working together with each other, the line, and their qb, to keep their qb upright and making plays. This concerted effort has been completely missing from our deep ball and vertical game because we never fielded a corps that actually got it.

This year should be different: the young kids are getting some time together under their belt, a second year with JC and Hue, and a couple of interesting offensive guys to help us just where we need it. We will see what JC is capable of this year. There will be little to blame it on come this time next year outside of JC, and barring a complete flop and somehow a decline in play by the new O line.

"tough times call for perseverance and a tough mind. I have been told that I can't play football before. We all know what happened with that. #neverquit"--Mark Herzlich

""The massive Raider Nation is beyond doubt the sleaziest and rudest and most sinister mob of thugs and wackos ever assembled."--Hunter S. Thompson

by brhynno on May 10, 2011 4:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Did I see e)all of the above?

I think for the most part JC barely had enough time for a receiver to run a complete route before JC was on the turf grabbing grass from his helmet…..and when he had the opportunity…the timing seemed to be off (even Jacoby’s crazy catches were him making some unreal plays)…but our wideouts need to step up- especially any wideouts that rhyme with Maywood-Jay. The O-line hopefully will be improved but it will take lots of time with the youth infusion. Hopefully, we keep the run first, run second, then short screens out of the backfield and use Zach Miller and Reese to soften the defense. No more just chuck and pray…..If we do chuck and pray I hope it is intercepted at the 4 yard line…so our defense can hold them. All about field position.

Raiders for Life

by blazersrock on May 10, 2011 4:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Need an all of the above option, but I voted for Jason. At the end of the day, he’s being paid for completing passes, deep and short. Gotta get more consistent with the deep ball though, those stats are alarming.

Bring me a shrubbery!

by JaKe. on May 10, 2011 8:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Oficially I Voted "JC" As Could Be Expected From My Past Comments...

Several good arguments raised regarding the “OL” and they failed to get the job done too but I can excuse some of that sense we were in flux between the “ZBS” and the PBS" which should be over this season with the release of Tommy Boy Cable and his undermining our “O”…Which I speculate was happening…

Regarding the "WR"s we fielded rookies and 2nd yr players who have not yet developed…Only one was a high rd pick and that pick was questionable to say the least but I still maintain hope in him to develop…I can excuse this group to a point because they don’t throw the ball to themselves…How can they be expected to make plays when the ball isn’t close…Little Jacoby Ford is the exception but few "WR"s have that playmaker ability…

“JC” was the seasoned vet who was a 1st rd pick and tooted as the next Jim Plunkett…What a freakin disappointment that was…He’s the one with the $$$ that was suppose to lead these young players to “V”….Well he failed and was the reason we lost a few…“SF”/Tenn/Pitts….He disappeared for entire halves and some entire games not completing a pass worth speaking about…

“SF’ 69yds passing…
Tenn 150yds passing
Pitts 121yds passing
“SD” 117yds passing
“KC” 135yds passing

And we won 2 of those games NOT on the strength of his arm…

by PantyRaider on May 10, 2011 11:52 PM PDT reply actions  

It was his first year behind a bad offensive line and poor recievers. 13 TDs to 8 INTs, 2300+ YDs, with a 84.5 QB Rating is pretty good considering the conditions he was playing under.

Bring me a shrubbery!

by JaKe. on May 11, 2011 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

He was not the reason we lost in

SF and Pitt, we were missing McFadden against SF and the whole team played like garbage.In pitt we were playing against the best run D in the NFL, and we still tried to run the ball, thats bad coaching.W

by RyanTheRaider on May 11, 2011 2:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

"JC" Wasn't Prepared To Play That Game And Pitts Knew It...

They stacked the box and let “JC” destroy us…

B. Gradkowski 13/24 98yds Int
J. Campbell 7/19 70yds Int

“JC” was out the following week…

This was our Rush: 16/50yds

M. Bush 4 33yds
D. McFadden 10 14yds
B. Gradkowski 1 12yds
M. Reece 1 2yds

by PantyRaider on May 11, 2011 3:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

ok?

i still dont think we can blame campbell for the loss, i put it more on Cable.

by RyanTheRaider on May 11, 2011 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Pitt game was the one game were

we just plain got the shit kicked out of us. We were clearly out matched, out coached and out desired. It was ugly!
 We had everything going against us (Brady kicking Pitts ass the week before, our beating them the year before, along with their desire to show the world that they were still one of the top teams in the league) and we looked like we had no idea it was coming. Like I said, it was ugly!

"Now I know what your thinking, did he fire six shots or only five. Ive forgotten myself in all this excitement, but being that this is the 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and could blow your head clean off, you have to ask your question. Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk!"
Dirty Harry Callahan

by rambis64 on May 12, 2011 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

All that, plus coming off the bye week ... what are we now after the bye, 0 for 8?

S-O-B: ITS HOW I ROLL, DEAL WITH IT.
"I did the (2010) draft. ... I made a trade for Seymour. Gave up the first-rounder this year. I could tell you why. You may not think it was a good trade. I thought it was a great trade. Still do. [Al Davis 1/1911]

by Sons-of-Blanda on May 12, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's right,

I forgot about that little stat, at least this year we have Denver at home after the bye and not a previously embarrassed monster looking for vengeance awaiting us on the road.

"Now I know what your thinking, did he fire six shots or only five. Ive forgotten myself in all this excitement, but being that this is the 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and could blow your head clean off, you have to ask your question. Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk!"
Dirty Harry Callahan

by rambis64 on May 12, 2011 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

lies, damn lies, and statistics....

First, you need to match playbook with personnel; second, you want to go long, you need time, timing, and WR who can not only get there but catch at full speed. Murphy, Chaz, and Miller struggled with injuries and DHB had balls go right through his hands. You can bring up your stats all you want but I’m not convinced that either Peyton nor Brady would have shined with Mario, the OL, and the sorry state of our WRs. Lastly, the skew in both the SF and Pitt games destroyed any imaginable stat as we got behind, couldn’t run and had to attempt to air it out.

by raiders4liffe on May 11, 2011 1:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Let's Go Back In Time...Your Memory Of "SF" -n- Mine Don't Gel...

True we ran like shit but when were we behind against “SF” who couldn’t move the ball either…

Crabtree made a go-ahead 32-yard TD reception on the last play of the third quarter and Smith hit Davis on a 17-yard score with 7:14 remaining. Frank Gore ran for 149 yards, including a 64-yard scramble that set up Davis’ third touchdown of the season.

The last quarter is when they led…

Raiders were up 6-3…Than down 9-10 until within the 7:14 mark of the 4th…We rushed for 110yds..43yds from Murphy…47yds by Bush…

This is why we lost:: J. Campbell 8/21 83yds 2 Ints

by PantyRaider on May 11, 2011 3:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Panty

JC was horrible that game; it was also a nightmare to watch the Steelers get at him; he was weak for the first 2 games of the year while you’re at it. My point is this, say what you will, but very few QBs can deliver 500 yrds of offence on back to back games, particularly at Denver. That in my eyes was the turning point that highlighted that he can get it done with the usual caveats – running game, WRs catching balls, and a cohesive OL (hate to bring it up but Gallery made an incredible difference to settle the left side). Without looking at the stats, however, you take out the Steelers and niners game, I would like to believe that they’re respectable in most categories. The thing about JC is through the questionable play-calling, the drops, the sacks, the fans getting at him, and the benching, he did not publicly flinch. Yes, he was pissed for getting benched, but it’s also what you want in your starting QB as opposed to the laughter a la Anderson, but he publicly kept his mouth shut and didn’t make any excuses. Bottom line is this, we need to run the ball and then mix it in the air. Just catch the catchables, we’ll be fine and he’ll be a top 15 QB. That’s all we need from him.

by raiders4liffe on May 11, 2011 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

OK...If He Can Deliver On Time On Target 60% I Will Be Happy...

Than it’s up to the others to catch his passes and make the additional ground so I’m not saying he has to be a 60% completion “QB” to win but damn…At least throw more catchable balls than not…At least be close most of the time…But I just don’t see his hesitation going away…His indecision when to run when to throw when to duck and take the sack…And of course when to slide…That’s the funny one…

by PantyRaider on May 11, 2011 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

He actually had

59.8% completion rate in 2010 including both 38% and 36.8% against the 9ers and Steelers, respectively. His career including weak teams in Wash is 60.4%. I expect 60% from him this year no matter what. What I’m hoping is a QB rating of 90% compared to 84.5% in 2010 and career 82%. I expect an increase of yrds passing to average 250 yrds per game with a 2:1 td to int ratio. Yards per game and td:int ratios are the key for a significant improvement in my view. I’m not trying to put all the blame on the WRs but last year was simply unacceptable, particularly if you want to be considered a playoff team. We’re not having this discussion if DHB caught the catchable balls thrown his way last year. I can’t blame JC for stopping to look at DHB when the game is on the line and waiting for anyone else to get open.

by raiders4liffe on May 12, 2011 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

If we can keep him from getting hammered on every play

there is no reason that your expectations for JC can’t be met and possibly exceeded, but a solid O-line will be key in that. JC is not the kind of QB that thrives under pressure, so keeping the pressure off him will be key.

"Now I know what your thinking, did he fire six shots or only five. Ive forgotten myself in all this excitement, but being that this is the 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and could blow your head clean off, you have to ask your question. Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk!"
Dirty Harry Callahan

by rambis64 on May 12, 2011 6:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

I picked the system

because we had such long drop backs that the line couldnt pick up, threw it to inexperienced wideouts, and forced plays that the team wasnt ready for. But i wouldnt pick that as something that shouldnt have been done last year. We are force feeding a deep threat to our team so they can start to synchronize and flow. @waiting for the raiders to have the biggest attacking pass offence on the world + play action

Don't Trade Monta
Bush is on Fire!
Huff likes it raw

by JohnnyDangerously on May 11, 2011 2:50 AM PDT reply actions  

It's the Line, Starts up front

Campbell is very accurate, has never had an issues with his Accuracy.. Needs consistency around him to be consistent the same as any other QB.. In his 1st season Campbell has been awesome… Exactly what Oakland needed… I’ve stop listening to what so many have to say for the simple fact, Capt. Checkdown has been learning a new offense every season AT THE NFL LEVEL… Forget about college but this guy has had to improvise his whole career.. In the NFL that’s going to end up being LOTS OF CHECKDOWNS which is what you are supposed to do.. His level sky rocketed the end of the Season as continuity was established, as Receivers began to step up and make the hard catches that all Great Receivers do. QB’s toss is up when they know receivers go up for it. That takes trust, and trust is earned. I’m through cause no stat should be reflective of a particular individual.. Football is a team sport, everyone must take accountability…

by Michael Eagle on May 15, 2011 10:41 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arqamaca-p218897_small
A Renewed Commitment to Excellence
Small
Ninja Goro's Statistical Look at Shane Lechler's Value

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ninja Goro's Graphical Analysis of Lechler and the Raiders defense
Arqamaca-p218897_small
When The Raiders.....(Poem)
Imag0622_copy_small
Just for fun......The Passion of Tebow
Small
Ninja Goro's Primer on Field Position
Ba-raiders13_ph1_0502695606_small
Warriors
Ace_and_skull_small
McClain Returns To The Raiders Pending Appeal
Angry_me_small
Death Ro options
Small
If we want to make the playoffs we need to sign these guys..
Small
Ninja Goro's Stat look at Marquette King

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50