Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Oakland Raiders' Chimdi Chekwa Amazes by Playing Decent Game

Inexplicably there are no pictures of Chekwa in a Raider uni on our database. So, we'll give Joe Porter some photo love too. He was much better than I thought he'd be.

Chimdi Chekwa wasn't the star. He didn't make any game changing plays, but he wasn't the goat. And for that reason, I feel compelled to give him props before anyone else in this game. 

Chekwa, and Joe Porter, were forced into action early after Chris Johnson pulled up with a bum hamstring, and he was rock solid. He gave up a few receptions, including a touchdown, but he also made some plays on the ball.

He was solid enough that the Jets couldn't come out and go to his man on every play. He never looked lost. He never got toasted, and he was never out of position. That is solid for any rookie—especially so in Chekwa's case.

Chekwa missed almost all of training camp with a dislocated shoulder. Then when he returned, he spent more time at safety. This guy has had just a handful of snaps against NFL players as a corner, and he held his own. You just can't say enough about that.

This game reflects what we already knew about Chekwa. He is serious about succeeding in the NFL. He does everything he can to prepare himself, and it paid huge dividends today.

Now keep preparing Chim Chek, cause chances are Chris Johnson will be out next week, and you are going to get tested next week against the Patriots aerial assault.

Comment 105 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Chimdi also had good coverage on the Plax TD

But that was just a great catch by a good player.

Well done Chim Chek!!

"We’re going to be a tough, rugged football team that walks with a swagger and plays the way the Raiders used to play." Hue Jackson

by Ozraider on Sep 25, 2011 11:11 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Or as we said to the jets

CHEK MATE!!

"We’re going to be a tough, rugged football team that walks with a swagger and plays the way the Raiders used to play." Hue Jackson

by Ozraider on Sep 25, 2011 11:12 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Time for Rod to coach him up!!!

I was impressed he didn’t look lost or scared. Played well for his experience level and was on a RedZone machine!
Porter gets lost although he will put his hat in there!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Chimdi was decent,

but Brady can be a machine.

I’d like to take a corner with our 1st round pick next year.

by xville on Sep 25, 2011 11:38 PM PDT reply actions  

YUP YUP

WE DONT NEED ANYMORE CBs ONCE CHIMDI & DVD MOLD WELL INTO THEIR POSITION IF NOT THIS YEAR THEY SURE R TO BREAK OUT NEXT I CAN ALREADY C AT LEAST CHEKWA THIS YEAR

by SA_OC on Sep 26, 2011 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

You take the best available player, and we'll have the chance to take a solid OLB

or Safety or CB, which I think are our primary needs.

we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!

by transparent58 on Sep 26, 2011 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

We need depth

at the CB position, and a 1st round prospect would be a good investment.

I’d like to keep Chimdi in the Safety rotation.

by xville on Oct 2, 2011 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Raiders will try to develope the CB's they have.

If not? What a waste of picks over the last two years.

by Captain Chaos on Sep 26, 2011 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

We’ve seen CJ burn us in games before last week Buffalo. Given Checkwa’s game today, I’m certainly willing to look past deficiencies against Brady and the Pats next week. I’d prefer to give him at least a 2-3 week test period.

by TC Blue on Sep 26, 2011 12:39 AM PDT reply actions  

I think DVD learned a lot by starting against NO.

If we want to hurry up and bring our players to a good standard level of play and since CJ is hurt, I believe it is worth our while to let Chekwa play against Brady. Moreover, he has already had a bit of a trial by fire because covering Plaxico must be a trial by fire test for any new rookie CB.

by RaiderPsycho on Sep 26, 2011 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really pleased about this congrtulations Chimdi...

…for him as a personal achivement given his difficult start to his career. Also very pleased for the Raiders. The previous draft is going to be proved an enormous success.

by animal_mutha on Sep 26, 2011 12:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes, I am completely for the draft.

I think next year’s draft, if the coaches continue as in the past two drafts, is going to really solidify the bully they already are.

by RaiderPsycho on Sep 26, 2011 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

key to beating Brady

will be our defensive line. If they can collapse the pocket consistently, as the Lions did in the preseason meeting, they can keep him from getting into a rhythm. The Pats defensive isn’t looking all that impressive, I’m expecting an exciting shootout next week similar to the Bills game…but with a different result of course!

"In football, I root for the Oakland Raiders because they hire castoffs, outlaws, malcontents, and f*ck -ups, they have lots of penalties, fights, and paybacks, and because Al Davis told the rest of the pig NFL owners to go get f*cked... Someday, the Raiders will be strong again, and they will dip the ball in **** and shove it down the throats of the wholesome, white, heartland teams that pray together and don't deliver late hits"
– George Carlin

"I'll do anything to score a touchdown. And I'm not afraid like some people, their afraid to call those plays. I'm not. That's the way I like to live my life, I like to live on the edge. And that's the way it is, and that's the way it's gon be."
-Hue Jackson

by AlDavis4Prez on Sep 26, 2011 12:44 AM PDT reply actions  

yup

the giants d-line is what won that superbowl game. If our d-line can cause havoc, i see another 3 int this game

RAIDERS NATION
"There only can be one nation, The Raider Nation"

by AlwaysWinBaby on Sep 26, 2011 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Would still like to see more blitzes vs. Pats

Our D-line is awesome, but throw that 5th rusher in there more often and sacks/opportune bad passes would rise in numbers. I was really suprised when we weren’t blitzing at the end of the jets game more with a 2 score lead.

by ElMattAdor on Sep 26, 2011 6:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

They're down their Center

and I think Solder can be beat consistently by Moss and Wimbley. We need to make them keep a TE in to block our pass rush, and I know Seymour wants to beat up Brady…

we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!

by transparent58 on Sep 26, 2011 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chekwa was "on it"

I was just as suprised that Sanchez was throwing some of those balls to his side as I was with his ability to man-up. He kept on his man like a blanket, which in most cases, would scratch that receiver as option on the play. Once he begins to get that head around and find the ball as he is covering I don’t think it would be wise to test him so much from a QBs view.
Way to go Chimdi, you made us proud yesterday.

by ElMattAdor on Sep 26, 2011 6:13 AM PDT reply actions  

A rookie issue

Good positioning for the most part, and he will learn to read the WR better, to know when to look. Turning his head a half-second earlier, and that TD could easily have been an INT, because it was just over his shoulder.

He played much better than I would have expected; he may move into a starting spot before the season is over, if he keeps this up…

The berserker is without honor; a true warrior knows and practices restraint

by signcut on Sep 26, 2011 7:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's why we brought in Rod Woodson

In case you missed it Nam got abused by Victor Cruz Sunday…. Who? exactly!

CC looked better than anytime in the pre looked like a different player altogether. Time for Smores to get in here now!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

too early for smoores

let him sit on the PS for a while, we already have 2 rookie CBs on roster

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Two Words

Joe Porter

It makes me shudder!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

he played good yesterday

and having half of our CBs being rookies would make me shudder

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

I answered Porter on another of your posts as well

I would rather see Routt CC and Smores as the nickel rather than CJ in any spot right now. Porter in run sets but against the Pats that’s not gonna be many.

Namndi was horrible yesterday I almost feel sorry for him. Then again you get what you asked for he wanted to go there ouch!

I just think CJ’s been playing hurt he is better than what he has shown so far this year. Also is DVD hurt? We need bodies badly. Can Murphy play corner?

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

DVD had a knee laceration

I think CJ was playing hurt as well,I think his knee injury has him slowed down so he has to hold onto the receiver so he doesnt get beat.

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indeed, hats off to Chim Chek .... gg dude!

But as I mentioned last week WTF is up with the scoring plays NOT being reviewed? I though that shit was supposed to be automatic, that’s why you can’t challenge?

Once again, just like with last week’s Jackson goal-line stop ERR Touchdown, the kicking team came out IMMEDIATELY after Plax’s last touchdown and kicked the PAT, CLEARLY too fast for any sort of review to have happened.

If you watch that play, CC ended up with the ball. I’m not saying it wasn’t a TD, maybe it was, but the point is … WHAT THE FUCK is up with them not reviewing AND you get a 15 yard penalty if coach throws the flag out so you can’t force a review either?!?

I swear to Dog I’m starting to think this rule was put in place so teh NFL can control the outcome of games, and there’s nothing anyone can do to stop it!

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 26, 2011 6:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Exactly.

So WTF is the actual RULE about what happens w/these plays?

They either need to LEGITIMATELY take the time to review EVERY scoring play, or they need to restore to the coaches the power to throw the red flag out there on scoring plays, one or the other.

From what I’ve seen all year so far, it seems like the league has taken away the ability to challenge on scoring plays from coaches, but WITHOUT actually reviewing the scoring plays upstairs like (I thought) they said they were going to be doing every time. They CLEARLY did not review Plax’s TD this week, nor Jackson’s TD last week, because the kicking teams came out and kicked WAY too fast for it to have happened.

It’s like they’re randomly deciding whether or not to actually do the scoring reviews, and the whole thing STINKS of the league taking over control over deciding who wins football games.

I find the whole situation VERY untoward, and sketchy as fuck.

And Panty … the problem is, you STILL DON’T GET the review when you throw the red flag, you just get a 15 yard penalty … that’s what happened to us in Buffalo, remember?!?

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 26, 2011 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also, I'm not 100% convinced Plax had a TD ...

You remember two years ago when Murphy caught a TD right before the end of the half against SD (pretty sure it was in Oakland) and he came down with total control of the ball, put both feet on the ground, but then the ball ‘moved’ when he hit the ground, and they fuckin’ waved off the TD because he didn’t maintain control all the way to the ground?

Well, considering CC ended up with the ball at the end of Plax’s TD catch, I’m not entirely sure he maintained control all the way to the ground either. Maybe the rule wouldn’t have applied because it wasn’t the ground that jarred the ball loose, it was a DB. But that was no ‘simple call’ in my eyes and it SHOULD have been reviewed … but it clearly wasn’t because the kicking team was out there kicking like 20 seconds later …

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 26, 2011 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

The game will be on the NFL Network again tomorrow night

Definitely a play to at least look at especially when the defender ends up with the ball.

You would think that would at least trigger a fleeting thought as to why the defender has the ball now right?

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately the TV coverage wasn't there ...

They didn’t do any sort of detailed review of the play where they show different angles to try to figure out if it was legit TD. So I doubt we’re going to learn anything new by watching the broadcast again.

This whole new ‘system’ just stinks to high heaven of the NFL trying to take over who wins and who loses. They’ve basically taken away coaches ability to challenge the games most important plays, and replaced it with NOTHING.

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 27, 2011 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah in the Sunday NIght game they told Tomlin he couldn't throw the flag... Nice right?

The Steeler’s usually get the benefit of the doubt in calls. Santonio Holmes in the Super Bowl? His second foot never touches the ground nay a word or a review just Steelers Win….

The replay booth above has to buzz the official to let them know they are reviewing the play. Then the official will halt play until the review is complete.

I still think you will have a new raider rule next year.
Raider rule 98763547.9874 after there is a scoring play it will become an official timeout and the play will be reviewed before the extra point attempt will be allowed.

I agree the Plax play should have been reviewed thankfully it didn’t matter.

I just hope the NFL doesn’t become the NBA!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's worse than you think. That non-review cost us the game.

Even if we assume that they get in on the very next play, they would have run at least thirty seconds off the clock lining up for and executing. That’s thirty fewer seconds that they have at the end of the game.

The game winning TD came with eighteen seconds left.

by Jason Scarbrough on Sep 26, 2011 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indeed that was one of my points last week

Just was a poor hole in an uncertain system behind the curtain!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Arguably true ...

And who knows, maybe we even stop ’em from getting in …

It’s just really frustrating that this half-baked ‘system’ was ever put in place. Coaches should still be allowed to challenge even if the booth officials arbitrarily decide not to review such plays.

The ‘system’, as it now stands, is just horrible and total bullshit. Sooner or later enough lame stuff is going to come from it that a LOT people, players, and coaches are going to be up in arms, and the league is going to have to change this rule.

It’s bad enough you can’t challenge in the last two minutes of halves, but at least I can say that the large majority of times I’ve watched games since that rule, the booth guys have done a pretty damn good job of deciding which plays to review, and coming up w/the right calls.

But the scoring play review situation … their decision-making in that regard has been atrocious thus far.

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 27, 2011 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would like to see the coaches request review when THEY choose.

On scoring plays, the coaches should have a flag just for those reviews. No matter the outcome, they wouldn’t lose a challenge or time out. Alot of the plays the booth wants to review are obviously a score. But then there are plays like these where it should be reviewed and isn’t. Coach pushes the issue, and gets flagged for it.

"You can't Appoint, Hire, or Declare Leadership" ~ Sonny Barger

by the red guy on Sep 27, 2011 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chekwa won our vote on nickel corner.

Looks like the fans might know something. I hope he gets a pick against Brady because his coverage skills are sharp.
Big up to Rod Woodson on his coaching skills on some of these younger players we have. The secondary has potential like the o-line did a season ago. If they all get on the same page and drop the stupid penalties they could be something. Can’t wait for Mike Mitchell to come back and start knocking heads around, welker over the middleeee………..THUD!!!!!

Chaz Schilens IS healthy.

by DarthDavis on Sep 26, 2011 7:22 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree Darth Chekwa looks like he is a decent corner....

He looked big next to the Jets receivers but is only 6 ft 192 , with Rod Woodson and Willie Brown coaching the secondary should continue to get better.
If the Raiders run and keep pressure on Brady they may be 3-1 next week they should be 3-0 right now

Yo homie you gotta puff puff give !

by BonGSmoKe on Sep 26, 2011 8:26 AM PDT reply actions  

All things being equal Chimdi played solid

Considering the circumsatnces— thrust into the basically starting role 3 games into the season he played exceptional. No flags. He had nice coverage on Plax for that td. Was just a perfect throw and catch.

Unfortunately we have real injury problems in our lb and secondary. Groves who was playing really well looks out. Huff is less than 100% w/ his groin. Now cj has a hammy. Mitchell and DVD are more than likely still out. Giordano doesnt impress me. Especially his “tackling”. He reminds me of S Schweigert.

by rat, el rat, mr. rat, the rat on Sep 26, 2011 8:51 AM PDT reply actions  

He honestly played better than CJ!

What did CJ do just last week? The week before that? I didnt see Chimdi getting costly penalties as the worst times. I didnt see him 5 yds off the reciever when they make the catch. Give it up to the rookie for a good half. Now lets become more consistant in the secondary. We should trade CJ for Asaunte Samuels and grab Darren Sharper for dept.

by LaRaider on Sep 26, 2011 8:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Thats my feeling too

I don’t think he was 100% game one and it’s been downhill. The wet barnyard week one did some hammy and groin damage.

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

The only way I start Chek is if CJ is hurt...Look playing that position injured is tough..

especially with a groin injury. You guys act like CJ is a bum or something, he can play, however, with the lack of depth he went out hurt anyway with a groin injury. Certain injuries are not going to hurt CB play too much, however, a groin injury is murder. First you have to go opposite the way you’re facing, then you have to turn and burst, and you are always breaking wide and that kills the groin, its ugly. And on top of that you are going full speed most of the time. Look Chek played well, but start? Yes, only if CJ is hurt, he needs to really heal that groin before he returns. And unless Chek really shows it, CJ starts when he is ready to go. And Chek hasn’t come close to that yet…Go Raiders!!!

by Rodney Sacramento on Sep 26, 2011 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

CJs not a bum

but CJ has been injured.Hes aggravated his injury in every game so far, so i think he should have limited playing time, or sit out against the Pats and Chekwa should start in his place.When CJ is healthy enough to not aggravate his injury then he should come back and regain his starting spot.

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just waiting on my man

Mike Mitchell to get back to game shape. Mikes like that LB in the secondary, like our Troy Palamaulu. Hes our TE mismatch in the secondary.

by LaRaider on Sep 26, 2011 9:02 AM PDT reply actions  

WORD!

Mike Missile has been missed if he came back this week that would be awesome!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Groves is out

would be great to get Mitchell back for the next 2 weeks to match up against the Pats & Texans in more nickle sets. We’ll see this week how it goes, because our secondary is very thin right now.

"Today I step into the shoes of a great man, a man by the name of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho."

by S Jay Bruin on Sep 26, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Groves looked like he was cramping

Say what you want about his play but not his heart! Dude is a warrior!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't question his heart or desire

just his ability to play in space, especially in coverage situations like he will be in the next couple of games.

"Today I step into the shoes of a great man, a man by the name of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho."

by S Jay Bruin on Sep 26, 2011 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I know it sucks

Hes a good dude and he’s funny he’s hard not to root for. This is a performance based industry he’s just behind on the learning curve. Hes a Edge lineman being asked to do a lot. The Raiders have been trying this formula for years he’s just another in the path. If you don’t cut it it doesn’t matter!

Still wish would would have kept Thomas Howard for coverage packages thanks to Sausage Neck!

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mike on Welker.

Nice. I hate that little Smurf.

"In football, I root for the Oakland Raiders because they hire castoffs, outlaws, malcontents, and f*** -ups, they have lots of penalties, fights, and paybacks, and because Al Davis told the rest of the pig NFL owners to go get f***ed. Someday, the Raiders will be strong again, and they will dip the ball in s*** and shove it down the throats of the wholesome, white, heartland teams that pray together and don't deliver late hits." - George Carlin.

by Screwfish on Sep 26, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Frustration with the defense

to me has had a lot to do with the young corners over the past 2 drafts not stepping up when needed. MacFadden & Ware didn’t make it to the second season & DVD had been torched all preseason. Hopefully Chekwa will continue to be the guy we’ve been looking for for the past couple of seasons to be able to plug into our secondary. Dude looked good against some tough receivers to cover. Hopefully DVD can come around too, as he has some skills, but if some of the corners can step up like the new receivers, we will be better as the season progresses.

Great win Raiders! Let’s get after NE!

"Today I step into the shoes of a great man, a man by the name of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho."

by S Jay Bruin on Sep 26, 2011 10:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Question for the Nation

I was planning on doing a look ahead to the 2012 NFL Draft and profiling a number of cornerbacks the Raiders may be interested in drafting in the first round. This was mostly because of the poor play of Chris Johnson. However, in light of Chekwa’s success in yesterday’s game and his high football acumen, I wonder if this is still something I should do. I don’t know if Chimdi is the answer, but I’m not sure what rookie could come in and do a better job than he did yesterday.

So, I could instead profile a number of other positions such as outside linebacker, wide receiver, offensive line, etc. Outside linebacker I think is our most glaring need. Groves has been playing well of late but he’s probably not the long-term answer for us.

So, what position should I make a post for? CB, OLB, something else?

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 1:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I would say olb and cb are our biggest needs

Having said that I would do olb because we have promising young talent at cb wich the same cannot be said at lb and I’m really disappointed I really wanted to gothel this year

by 209raider on Sep 26, 2011 1:32 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

CB still will be a need/priority

I’m not sure Chris Johnson has much productive starting time left as he is a limited player. Chekwa played a good game yesterday, but will need to see how he does over a season. The other corners are still very raw and may need a year or two before they become legit starters, and maybe only DVD has the talent to start. We will see by the end of the season where these guys will be, and hopefully they will continue to develop to make CB a less pressing need. OLB will continue to be a badly needed upgrade for our team.

"Today I step into the shoes of a great man, a man by the name of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho."

by S Jay Bruin on Sep 26, 2011 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can always do both

I am not sold on either Chekwa or DVD as long-term solutions. What I see on the various mock draft sites is a lot of “Raiders will take Cornerback X here because they lost Nnamdi Asomugha and will need to replace him.”

We did replace Nnamdi, with Stanford Routt, who is playing like a Pro Bowler. Our problem has been replacing Stanford Routt himself as our CB2.

The thing about the OLB position is that there are two of them in our 4-3 defense, and even if we get a healthy Goethel back next year we are still starting Groves and Jarvis Moss at those positions. A blue-chip OLB prospect would seriously upgrade our front seven and make up for any deficiencies Rolando McClain may continue to have.

There are four CBs in particular that I think the Raiders may target. I haven’t looked so much at the OLBs but that shouldn’t be too hard.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we can get Janoris Jenkins

with a compensatory pick, and it would be worth the gamble in the 3rd since he’s gotten the “discipline case” tag and is playing his senior year at D2 North Alabama…just a hunch.

we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!

by transparent58 on Sep 26, 2011 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

He was the balls at Florida and would be super, but he will probably fall because of character concerns. I wouldn’t consider him in the first when there are so many other CB prospects, but in the third with a comp pick he would be a steal.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are three OLBs worthy of a first round pick

They are Zach Brown, Courtney Upshaw, and Travis Lewis. However, Upshaw lines up primarily as a lineman in Alabama’s complex defense even though he is listed at OLB, so it’s likely he is a better fit for a 3-4 than the 4-3 the Raiders run so he won’t be targeted by Oakland.

The best linebacker in the draft is clearly Vontaze Burfict, but he is an ILB and we don’t need one of those.

However, there are four CBs worthy of a first round pick, five if Morris Claiborne declares.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vontaze Burfict, ILB Arizona State
Luke Kuechly ILB Boston College
i think both can play OLB, if we have a shot at one, we should take it

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

They might be able to

But to be honest I think they will both be gone before the Raiders pick, which I think will be in the 20-25 range. Zach Brown might as well, if he runs a sub-4.4 40 time. I really don’t like this draft for OLB talent, it’s pretty stocked with WR, CB and DE.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

that's pretty fast for a linebacker

And during the combine on a fast turf he can probably do better than that, which would put him at a top-15 draft position without much doubt.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Sep 26, 2011 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dont like the OLB depth in this draft either

but the MLB talent is deep this year.MLBs arent usually taken early i believe, Burfict will be, but i think Kuechly could fall to us, and if he does, we should pounce.

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I doubt Jenkins falls to the bottom of the 3rd.

He would have gone in the top 10 had he come out last year. He’ll go in the 2nd.

I still think that we should trade down from the 1st next year to get extra picks.

"In football, I root for the Oakland Raiders because they hire castoffs, outlaws, malcontents, and f*** -ups, they have lots of penalties, fights, and paybacks, and because Al Davis told the rest of the pig NFL owners to go get f***ed. Someday, the Raiders will be strong again, and they will dip the ball in s*** and shove it down the throats of the wholesome, white, heartland teams that pray together and don't deliver late hits." - George Carlin.

by Screwfish on Sep 26, 2011 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Safety

I know it looks like we’re set there, but we traditionally take safeties and mold them into physical corners…we need big, athletic guys to play in our secondary.

OLB is another area of concern.

we never retreat we always ATTACK!!!

by transparent58 on Sep 26, 2011 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Regarding OLB

Aaron Curry is on the outer at Seattle, what do people think about trading for him? He probably won’t cost us much.

"In football, I root for the Oakland Raiders because they hire castoffs, outlaws, malcontents, and f*** -ups, they have lots of penalties, fights, and paybacks, and because Al Davis told the rest of the pig NFL owners to go get f***ed. Someday, the Raiders will be strong again, and they will dip the ball in s*** and shove it down the throats of the wholesome, white, heartland teams that pray together and don't deliver late hits." - George Carlin.

by Screwfish on Sep 26, 2011 7:23 PM PDT reply actions  

I saw that last week I almost posted it...

Make you curious as to why? They say it because he wasn’t drafted by Carroll… Maybe he doesn’t like Carroll or Cable! Would definitely increase depth for sure and add flexibility.

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

All those people that thought we should have drafted Casy Mathews!

I was not one of those and I’m a huge Oregon fan! Go Ducks!

The Philadelphia Eagles shifted their linebackers around for Sunday’s game against the New York Giants, pushing rookie Casey Matthews from the middle linebacker spot over to the weak side. After a rough afternoon, might he be pushed out of the starting lineup entirely?

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Curry will now hit unrestricted free agency after the 2012 season, and the regime that did not draft him gets out (mostly) of a contract they didn’t negotiate. Moreover, Curry becomes easier to trade.

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Update
Following Aaron Curry’s demotion from the Seattle Seahawks’ starting lineup, there were musings upon his future with the organization, as it appears that he may be the next player turned over by the Pete Carroll regime.

Curry had a captivating series of exchanges on Twitter following his first game as a reserve — as chronicled by Danny O’Neil of the Seattle Times — and in particular, he seems generally open to getting a fresh start elsewhere. In particular, he noted that he’d be ecstatic to play for the Carolina Panthers (a team that could use a linebacker, given the season-ending injuries to Thomas Davis and Jon Beason).

It remains to be seen whether the Seahawks will make a move this season with Curry, after restructuring his deal and canceling the final two seasons. As for the expected compensation in return for the LB, Dave “Softy” Mahler of 950 KJR has word from an NFL source that a seventh-round pick is the best the Seahawks could get. There have been no reports of teams calling to check on Curry’s availability, though that could change prior to the Oct. 19 deadline.

- Tim Kavanagh

by samiam2112 on Sep 27, 2011 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

WLB,C, S

We need an upgrade at those three positions next year. WLB to help DeathRo and help push him. C because Satale is good, but we can still get better there. S only because if they dont workout there they can be put at CB or DB. Thats just three quality picks that I feel would help us in the long term. I would ONLY trade up if either WLB or S was a “cant miss” talent. That would mean either the next Ed Reed or Ray Lewis (funny their both Ravens), but highly doubtful.

by LaRaider on Sep 26, 2011 8:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Center?

we have Wiz, and Satale is playing damn good.Our O-Line has only allowed 2 sacks so far this season(one was when JC and DMC got their feet tangled) and they have been dominant in the run game.We need to draft defense next year, OLB,CB,S,NT,MLB, i would not be upset if we did not draft a single offensive player.

by RyanTheRaider on Sep 26, 2011 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

The O-line is playing at an elite level

Name me a O-line really playing better in the AFC. Have you not seen whats been going on how many sacks? We have the leading rusher in the league. Satele is young and good! You are also aware there is usually 3 to 4 centers in a daft and 32 good ones in the league? You know the Jets are pretty good right?

by samiam2112 on Sep 26, 2011 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just before the half

Am I the only one that found it to be just a lil out of place (or a bunch of BS) that the ref just happened to fall seconds before the Raiders were gonna try to kick that field goal before the half was over? I don’t know about you but i’ve never seen a ref fall with the ball in hand just seconds before a team is on the verge of scoring to tie a game. I’d bet my car if it was any other team the ref would not have fallen on the ground.

by Edward Treadway on Sep 26, 2011 11:20 PM PDT reply actions  

100%

They would have had to stop the clock then put time back on or at least let them have the attempt.

by samiam2112 on Sep 27, 2011 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Naw ...

Cause if he was really trying to screw us, he would’ve tripped AND fumbled the ball away, to waste even more time.

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 27, 2011 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not only that ...

But the Raiders FOR ONCE were actually the beneficiary of some bad calls that went in our favor. And we all know that basically NEVER happens.

I think the Jewish ref was showing our Jewish owner a bit of love in this game, actually ;)

by Brett J Valjalo on Sep 27, 2011 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation Blog about the Oakland Raiders.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arqamaca-p218897_small
A Renewed Commitment to Excellence
Small
Ninja Goro's Statistical Look at Shane Lechler's Value

Recent FanPosts

Index_small
Quentin Groves
Small
Snake by Ken Stabler, 1986 PART ONE
Small
Ninja Goro's Graphical Analysis of Lechler and the Raiders defense
Arqamaca-p218897_small
When The Raiders.....(Poem)
Imag0622_copy_small
Just for fun......The Passion of Tebow
Small
Ninja Goro's Primer on Field Position
Ba-raiders13_ph1_0502695606_small
Warriors
Ace_and_skull_small
McClain Returns To The Raiders Pending Appeal
Angry_me_small
Death Ro options

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editors

Sunshine_small Raymond St. Martin (Saint)

5771756_f8ba_625x1000_1__small Levi Damien

Moderators

Raiders_logo_small TheRaiderWay

Westyule_small Sons-of-Blanda

Editorial Staff

Ka1z3r_small KA1Z3R

Raiders_small LiveAdam

_the_beast__reece_small brhynno

Richraven-irish_small RDreamer

Contributors

Small Travis Goethel 50