Being that we have brought over half the Houston Texan's coaches and Ben Tate and Bush in very similar situations what do you think would work out best. Both backs are looking for more of a lead role, even though bush has stated on his twitter that him and DMC are a 1-2 punch. Houston's 1-2 punch was foster and Tate. with DMC and Foster both having injury issues and both being the elite talent on their team it is almost identical. In our current position trading McFadden is a HELL NO!!, he is only due under $6mil next two seasons that's average for RB in the league right now even the franchise tag is way more than what we are paying. But I would rather take Ben Tate and our coaches knowing his running style over Bush. The franchise and trade is always an option, but not sure if teams are willing to pay franchise money and we could possibly get a 2-3 round for him.
Our backfield would look like this DMC/Tate/Jones/and I would so love picking up Doug Martin. Jones/Martin combo would be nice for the future. Then at FB: Reece and Late Draft Pick,Cartwright or Gordon thought he was decent back there in the limited action for blocking.
Who would fit us better?
Micheal Bush (89 votes)
Ben Tate (55 votes)
Franchise and Trade Bush for RB in Draft (28 votes)
Draft a RB (4 votes)
Another Free Agent (11 votes)
187 total votes