Jonathan Daniel
As we all know, the Raiders are $6,612,500 million dollars over the cap coming off a 4-12 campaign. It is up to Reggie McKenzie to determine which positions he needs to upgrade via the draft and free agency. While the exact number of starters that need to be acquired is debatable, the Raiders do need to restock at many positions. The positions that need new starters in order of importance are as follows:
- Defensive End (The teams pass rush was abysmal last year)
- Cornerback (the team has 0 legitment starters)
- Offensive Tackle (RT position needs to be able to handle speed rushers)
- Middle Linebacker (Left empty by McClains departure)
- Defensive Tackle (Possibility of two new starters here)
- Offensive Guard (Brisiel doesn't fit new system and Carlisle is too old)
Now, as previously mentioned, the Raiders are over the cap, so they will need to choose wisely how they address these holes. Below is a figure showing the average salaries by position in the NFL.
While these averages are calculated using the five highest paid at each position, the averages remain relative down through the lower range talent. Using the positions that apply to the Raiders needs, a new order can be generated sorting the positions from most to least expensive:
- Defensive End (Previously 1)
- Offensive Tackle (Previously 3)
- Cornerback (Previously 2)
- Middle Linebacker (Previously 4)
- Defensive Tackle (Previously 5)
- Offensive Guard (Previously 6)
In this list OT and CB have shifted positions while the rest have remained the same. For sake of argument, we will assume that there are is no starting quality talent at these positions currently on the roster. While this assumption is most likely wrong, Reggie would be best advised to err on the side of caution. If the current players do not pan out this strategy will prove to be a wise insurance policy.
Due to the new rookie wage scale the Raiders should select the positions which are most expensive in the draft to save cap room. Inversely, McKenzie should target FA's from the bottom of this list up. Most experts predict that you can mold about 30% of your draft into starters. Assuming that the Raiders stick with the number of picks they have (8) 30% is 2.4 starters. Dennis Allen will most likely be forced to round the number of rookie starters up to 3 due to lack of talent on the roster. Assuming the Raiders get 3 starters from the draft, that leaves 3 starters to be acquired via FA.
Free Agency:
Starting from the bottom of the list, OG would be the cheapest position to fill. Below are a list of the top 5 OG's available in FA:
- Andy Levitre – BUF
- Lance Louis – CHI
- Kevin Boothe – NYG
- Matt Slauson – NYJ
- Louis Vasquez – SD
Second Position on the list is DT, again listed below are the top 5:
- Henry Melton – CHI
- Terrance Knighton – JAC
- Desmond Bryant – OAK
- Alan Branch – SEA
- Jason Jones – SEA
The final position to be addressed in FA would be the LB spot:
- Dannell Ellerbe – BAL
- Rey Maualuga – CIN
- Erin Henderson – MIN
- Michael Boley – NYG
- Chase Blackburn – NYG
The Draft:
There has been a lot of speculation on this site that the Raiders will try to trade down to acquire more picks. While this is a reasonable scenario, for the purpose of this article we will assume that the team will stick with its current picks. Since it is most likely that starters are most easily found in the earlier rounds we will consider the team's 1st, 3rd, and 4th round picks in this article. Again using the cost chart, Reggie should select players in the following order: DE, OT, and CB.
Round 1 (DE):
According to CBS these are the top 5 DE's, all of which should be available with the #3 pick:
| RANK | PLAYER | POS. | POS. RANK | SCHOOL | CLASS | HT. | WT. | PROJ. ROUND |
| 2 | *Bjoern Werner | DE | 1 | Florida State | Jr | 6-4 | 256 | 1 |
| 4 | *Damontre Moore | DE | 2 | Texas A&M | Jr | 6-4 | 250 | 1 |
| 9 | *Barkevious Mingo | DE | 3 | LSU | rJr | 6-4 | 240 | 1 |
| 16 | Ezekiel Ansah | DE | 4 | Brigham Young | Sr | 6-5 | 274 | 1 |
| 21 | Datone Jones | DE | 5 | UCLA | rSr | 6-4 | 280 | 1 |
Round 3 (OT):
the top 5 prospects at OT will definitely be gone by the time the Raiders select again. here are the top 5 picks that will most likely be available:
| RANK | PLAYER | POS. | POS. RANK | SCHOOL | CLASS | HT. | WT. |
| 55 | Kyle Long | OT | 6 | Oregon | Sr | 6-6 | 304 | 2 |
| 57 | Dallas Thomas | OT | 7 | Tennessee | rSr | 6-5 | 308 | 2 |
| 65 | *David Bakhtiari | OT | 8 | Colorado | rJr | 6-4 | 295 | 2-3 |
| 79 | *Chris Faulk |
OT | 9 | LSU | rJr | 6-5 | 323 | 2-3 |
| 98 | Jordan Mills | OT | 10 | Louisiana Tech | Sr | 6-5 | 318 | 3 |
Round 4 (CB):
Top 5 CB's who will be available during round 4:
| RANK | PLAYER | POS. | POS. RANK | SCHOOL | CLASS | HT. | WT. | PROJ. ROUND |
| 105 | Blidi Wreh-Wilson | CB | 12 | Connecticut | rSr | 6-1 | 192 | 3-4 |
| 111 | B.W. Webb | CB | 13 | William & Mary | rSr | 5-10 | 183 | 3-4 |
| 123 | *Tharold Simon | CB | 14 | LSU | Jr | 6-2 | 193 | 4 |
| 139 | Leon McFadden | CB | 15 | San Diego State | Sr | 5-10 | 193 | 4-5 |
| 143 | Dwayne Gratz | CB | 16 | Connecticut | rSr | 5-11 | 200 | 4-5 |
Conclusions:
The Raiders are in another bind this year to fill holes with little money. Using the draft wage scale as an asset, Reggie should be able to fill these 6 positions and remain under the cap. The selections are up for debate, but the strategy should remain sound. If any FA signing or draft pick goes sour, this strategy should allow for it to make minimal impact on the team.



There are 32 Comments. Add yours. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.