Thought of this the other day and have been debating it in my own head so now I want your opinion. Would you rather have the 5 best O-lineman regardless of what position they play or would you rather have the 5 best at their best position? What I mean is say for example recently signed Austin Howard. Hes supposed to be a up and coming RT and yet we're moving him to RG just for the sake of getting menelik watson on the field. Seeing how hes already kind of established at RT wouldn't it make more sense to play watson at RG? I guess another way of looking at it is, would you would want the best RT playing RT and try to figure out the RG position with someone else or move him to RG and hope RT works out with watson? Seems like leaving him at RT (if thats his best position) and finding a RG would only cause 1 problem, finding a RG but moving him causes 2 problems. Hoping hes good at RG AND having to find a RT. With the coaches out to put the 5 best on the field im sure this wont be the only question that comes up.