Thanks for inviting me back
As I was asked to come back after the game, here I am. Unfortunately, Monday doesn't work for me.
So, what did ya think of the game?
What did ya think of your no. 5 rushing offense? I seem to remember someone saying something... Incase your wondering 85 yards total. Here's my question for you. Down by four scores why do you run the ball? Isn't there a guy by the name of Porter on the field. Play jump ball three downs in a row.
Which leads me to something some else said. Hmmm, Raiders pass defense. I believe I said, "Why pass? With your run defense; run." 180 yards rushing. Although, the pass defense didn't seem to slow Favre down (115 passer rating).
Which was your favorite Packer touchdown? I can't decide between Jennings 80 yard walk into the end zone or Dwight's fumble/Blackmon's recovery in the end Zone.
Ya think the Geezer will draft a GM next year?
Any word on who Kiffin is inviting to prom?
Here's a poll question for you. If you pooled the Raiders and the 49ers talent could you field a team that could win 8 games?
Next time listen. Take the Packers and the points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I think..
What's gonna happen when your team has a tough schedule? What's going to happen when Favre goes down? Honestly, what's the point of even winning 12-13 games if you're just going to get crushed in the playoffs? You don't have a shot at the bowl, so instead you turn your sights to the fucking raiders?
You're a big man. 10 wins in the last 3 years and you come here trying to make a statement. You wouldn't dare step up to a Cowboys blog. You know you'd have some words to eat.
Unlike the homey raiders fans we have at this blog, I didn't expect them us to win this game. 34 degrees is Favre weather. Duh. But seriously, are you trying to kick us when we're down? How can you possibly do that?
We have a future. Whats yours? Your defense? Aaron Rodgers?
Give me a break. There's nowhere for us to go but up. You've got nowhere to go but down. So come back after you get the pants beat off you in the playoffs, making this entire run a joke for Brett. Hopefully his old ass will retire this year, giving your chance a small hope of a future.
by xcoma on
Dec 9, 2007 3:26 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
LOGIC?
Youngest team in the NFL. Best GM in professional sports. Salary cap wizards on staff. Excellent coach. Did you see Rogers play in Dallas? You mean that defense that held the RRRaaaidaas under 85 yards rushing (4th best in the NFL ya know) and under 150 passing? Future looks good to me.
Who's going to beat the GBP in the playoffs?
by packfan on
Dec 9, 2007 8:22 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
GG.
We just went to the bowl 5 years ago.
I really didn't know that RECENT losers meant Perennial losers. Use a dictionary next time.
Half of the stupid bullshit you spouted is subjective, and not worth touching on.
WHOS GOING TO BEAT GBP IN THE PLAYOFFS?
DALLAS. BOOK IT.
If they even get to the bowl, you think they can beat the Patriots? I mean be honest with yourself.
What's the fucking point?
And none of your retarded argument has left us with any reason justifying why you decided to a 4-8 raiders teams sportsblog and talk shit.
The only people that had doubt that your team was the better one was you.
Favre saying this is the best GBP team he's ever played for isnt going to save you idiots from joining us in the offseason a couple weeks later.
by xcoma on
Dec 9, 2007 9:22 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, I'll "book it" , Dano
The Patriots look beatable. I think Indy or Jacksonville (these guys look scary) can beat them. It's the Pats conference to lose, but I think it can happen.
If you read some of the other blogs on this site, there were people who thought they'd beat the GBP. You might want to aim some of your hostility at them. Otherwise I wouldn't have had to point out you're one of the worst organizations in football. Seriously, you don't see the parallel between the increasing effects of dementia for the Geezer and the decline of your team? How many coaches in the last 5 years?
Coma,
On a personal note: I think it's great the California Penal System teaches you guys how to use computers. But, if you don't get some help with those anger management issues, you're just going to end up back inside. Good luck, man.
by packfan on
Dec 10, 2007 8:20 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Question
Number four might be the big green, but the blue star must be his Kryptonite.
It must be so fulfilling to you to be Nostradamus and predict that your playoff-bound team could beat our bumps-in-the-road boys, but if you believe the Pack will run through Dallas at home and beat any of the AFC Power Houses, then the heroin you are buying from that crack igloo over there in GB just turned sour.
I expect you to post on every SB site that you went on if the Pack win the Superbowl or not.
You called your shot and made it this week, though the rest of America could have told you that this was going to happen.
I'll tell you this much though, us Raider fans remember when people come around to our front porch and leave flaming bags of poop on our steps. Will you man up and collect if your team goes belly up?
I can't wait to find out.
by oaklandSMASH on
Dec 10, 2007 2:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pacfan
"For about a quarter century after Lombardi left the Packers, they had comparatively little success compared to the 1960s. In the 24 seasons from 1968 to 1991, the Packers had only five seasons with a winning record (above .500), one being the shortened 1982 strike season. They appeared in the playoffs twice during that period, with a record of 1-2. The period saw five different head coaches - Phil Bengtson, Dan Devine, Bart Starr, Forrest Gregg, and Lindy Infante - two of which were former Packer players in Lombardi's era (Starr and Gregg), and one of which was a former coach (Bengtson). Examples of poor draft choices shaping seasons are often mentioned in the context of this time period. Examples include the 1974 draft, in which coach Dan Devine sent five draft picks (two first-rounders, two second-rounders and a third) to the Los Angeles Rams for aging quarterback John Hadl who would spend only 1 1/2 seasons in Green Bay.[3] Another came in 1989, when players such as Barry Sanders, Deion Sanders, and Derrick Thomas were available, and the Packers chose offensive lineman Tony Mandarich. Though rated highly by nearly every professional scout at the time, Mandarich's performance failed to meet expectations. ESPN has rated Mandarich as the third "biggest sports flop" in the last 25 years.[4]"
This guy has twenty four years worth of impotence stored up and still fucking with his head from the seventies, eighties and most of the nineties. By the way how good were the Raiders during that period? The Raiders will never have that long of a dry spell.
Still drinking the cool aid!
Go Raiderrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs
by sabp on
Dec 12, 2007 5:14 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice Work:
by saint on
Dec 12, 2007 5:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We'll do our best, saint.
I'm one for keeping loudmouth fans accountable on SB and you better believe I already registered oaklandSMASH on the pack board.
by oaklandSMASH on
Dec 13, 2007 1:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs










