clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Rival Report 5/20: Washington Post survey finds 90% of Native Americans polled not offended by name "Redskins"

New, comments
Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

It's that time of year again, the time where we have a debate about a certain name of a team in the NFL that should or shouldn't still exist in 2016. That's right folks, the debate over the name "Redskins" has hit the main stream again, though this time the defense of the name got some ammunition.

Those bullets come in the form of a Poll put out by the Washington post that asked whether the name was offensive to 504 self-proclaimed Native Americans. In a surprising twist, 9 out of 10 of the people polled said that they do not believe the name is offensive. Well, if 90% of 504 people don't find it offensive then it must not be then right?!

Forget the fact that 504 people is an incredibly small number to then extrapolate their response to millions of people in the country sharing that same opinion. Also, that only 44% of the 504 people surveyed were actually registered as part of a Native American tribe is a non-factor too apparently. After all, 90%!

Here is the thing, people can choose to be offended and not offended by all sorts of things. However, that doesn't change THE FACT that "Redskins" is a dictionary defined slur. This isn't an opinion at all, the writers of our English Language decided this many years ago. It is a slur, whether the majority of people find it offensive or not.

To put out this poll and plaster everywhere "9 out of 10 Native Americans do not find the name offensive" because 90% of 504 people answered a question that way is preposterous to me anyway. If you went to the original Woodstock and put out a survey about drug use in the 60's it would have had a huge percentage saying that it was thought of "highly". However, that doesn't then become proof that everybody thought that way!

That is an extreme example because the Washington Post probably didn't send this survey out to people in environments that obviously would have had no negative feelings about the name, but it still goes to show that polls can easily be manipulated to gain the numbers that you want to project. That only 44% of these individuals in the survey were actually registered Native Americans instead of just self-proclaimed goes to this point as well, because why would they not send it out to only registered tribe members?

The other part of this that get's me is acting like 1 out of 10 people being offended is fine, because 10% of Native Americans in the country would still be a very large number of people offended by the name. That is still more than enough people being offended in my mind to make the change, it is a plenty large enough minority for the majority to respect and adjust for.

Cue the "Next will be the Cowboys name because they killed the Native Americans" arguments and the "PC world is so soft" bullshit. Maybe it is the minority of people that believe it's offensive but that it is still enough that the majority of people should respect it, if it was up to the majority of people on everything MANY things would have never changed.

No surveys in the world will change the history of that word nor the fact that it is a slur. Even if there was a survey that could accomplish that it sure as hell would be conducted on more than just 504 people. Have fun in the comments section below, it is sure to be a doozy,

Most Native Americans not offended by Washington team name: poll - NY Daily News
Many people find the Washington NFL team’s name to be distasteful, ignorant and even racist.

Poll: 9 in 10 Native Americans do not oppose 'Redskins' name | Shutdown Corner - Yahoo Sports
From Yahoo Sports: A new Washington Post poll has shown broad support among Native Americans for the 'Redskins' team name.

Dan Snyder's resolve strengthened by latest poll on Redskins name - Washington Redskins Blog- ESPN
A new Washington Post poll found that 90 percent of Native Americans aren't bothered by the team's name.

Other stories from around the AFC West

Denver Broncos

The NFL's No. 1 defense in 2015 has 'another level' for 2016 - Mile High Report
It's not just hyperbole from this team. They believe it. They mean it. They will it. (MAK: Yeah, Right. They might still be great but they won't be better.)

Kiszla: Face it, Broncos fans. Denver isn't going to win the Super Bowl again. - The Denver Post
Oh, this will tick off everybody in Broncos Country. The proud men on the NFL's No. 1 defense are certain to cry disrespect.

San Diego Chargers

SITE NEWS: End of an era at Bolts from the Blue - Bolts From The Blue
John Gennaro is stepping down as the managing editor, and Richard Wade will be charged with taking his place.

San Diego Chargers' Joey Bosa growing tired of J.J. Watt comparisons - San Diego Chargers Blog- ESPN
It's understandable that Chargers rookie Joey Bosa wants to let people know that he stands on his own, but he should embrace lofty expectations.

Kansas City Chiefs

Jamaal Charles is (still) a serious bargain - Arrowhead Pride
A big one.

Chiefs will have one of the youngest offensive lines once again - Arrowhead Pride
The Chiefs projected starting o-line would put them sixth youngest.

Other stories from around the NFL

Bill Barnwell's offseason report cards for all 32 NFL teams
From coaching changes to free agency to the draft, Bill Barnwell grades how every NFL team fared this offseason now that the signings and trades are all but finished.

NFL to return more than $723G it improperly used for military tributes | Fox News
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said Thursday that the league will return more than $723,000 of taxpayers' money to the government -- money that had been paid to NFL teams for sponsored military tributes over the past four seasons.